Similar documents
Docket



Docket

Docket

CA NOS , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No , , Consolidated with Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

Docket

Orders/Judgments Lists

General Docket US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

General Docket US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit


IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

General Docket United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit

UCB, Inc. Defined Benefit Pension Plan Litigation NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:08-cv JSW. Parties and Attorneys

JJ Richard Cottone v. Kenneth C. Jenne, II

General Docket US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ERIN SANBORN-ADLER, * v. * * No LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF * NORTH AMERICA, et al.

FINAL ORDER AFFIRMING TRIAL COURT. the trial court s Final Judgment entered July 16, 2014, in favor of Appellee, Emergency

Received by Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division Two

Case: /15/2012 ID: DktEntry: 269 Page: 1 of 8. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit BILL OF COSTS

mg Doc 3836 Filed 05/28/13 Entered 05/28/13 10:24:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 11

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

Docket

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. TIMOTHY WHITE, ROBERT L. BETTINGER, and MARGARET SCHOENINGER,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ELLIS TURNAGE APPELLANT V. NO CA COA ELLIS CHRISTOPHER BROOKS, ET. AL.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOCKING COUNTY

Docket No In The United States Court of Appeals For The First Circuit. Appellee, DZHOKHAR A. TSARNAEV, Defendant Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, CAUSE NO.: A

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, CAUSE NO.: A

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 936 Filed: 08/11/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:14311 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

U.S. District Court. Northern District of Illinois (Chicago) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 96-CV-852. Ashenden, et al v. Lloyd's of London, et al

No. 47,333-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * *

Case 1:08-cv GWM Document 116 Filed 07/28/11 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY Abigail Aragon, District Judge

Green Machine Corp v. Zurich Amer Ins Grp

Circuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017

Case No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff Appellant,

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT KAWA ORTHODONTICS, LLP, Plaintiff-Appellant,

COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

Wayne W. Williams, in his official capacity as the Colorado Secretary of State; Colorado Department of State; and the State of Colorado,

Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAL UNREPORTED

SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA

No: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. JOHN C. GORMAN, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 868 Filed: 07/06/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:12186 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

DOCKET NO. AP ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) This case arises out of a Forcible Entry and Detainer Action that Appellee Rowell, LLC

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS. Appeal of -- ) ) The Swanson Group, Inc. ) ASBCA No ) Under Contract No. N C-9509 )

Case: Document: 27 Page: 1 Filed: 06/05/

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT in WAWA ESOP LITIGATION Pfeifer v. Wawa, Inc. et al, Case No (E.D. Pa.)

**ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 8, 2017** IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No Eugene Evan Baker, Plaintiff-Appellant, Defendants-Appellees.

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

D-1-GN NO.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VIFX LLC By Richard G. Vento I v. Director Virgin Islands Bureau

MAGISTRATE JUDGE MONA K. MAJZOUB SCHEDULING DOCUMENTS 3/28/2011

In this PIP case, State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. (State Farm), the Defendant below,

LEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Supreme Court of the United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF CLASS CERTIFICATION AND PARTIAL PROPOSED BIOVAIL SETTLEMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOCKING COUNTY

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2017

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS IN RE AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE CO. Lead Case No. 05-cv LITIGATION

If you are or were employed by Farmers Insurance Exchange as a claims representative, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

DELL SERVICE CONTRACT TAX REFUND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT ( SBE Settlement )

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD APRIL 12, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2011-CA-01274

Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAEF UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017

United States Court of Appeals

THE HANDBOOK OF THE LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO

General Docket Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. DAVID MILLS, Appellant V. ADVOCARE INTERNATIONAL, LP, Appellee

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIFTH DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY. Trial Court No CV-0525

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE. Martin L. Ehlen, Chicago, Illinois, for the appellant.

smb Doc 72 Filed 08/11/14 Entered 08/11/14 20:44:35 Main Document Pg 1 of 5

NO IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

No U IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

NO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ANDREW AUERNHEIMER,

Case 2:16-bk BB Doc 853 Filed 09/18/17 Entered 09/18/17 13:04:31 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

Court of Appeals of Ohio

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Myriam Fejzulai, et al. v. Sam s West Inc., et al.

APPLE INC. S SUBMISSION IN SUPPORT OF FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND PLAN OF ALLOCATION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Debtors. Polaroid Consumer Electronics, LLC; Polaroid Latin America I Corporation;

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT. ALLERGAN, INC. and SAINT REGIS MOHAWK TRIBE, Plaintiffs/Appellants,

Transcription:

Page 1 of 11 General Docket United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-16188 Docketed: 05/11/2011 Nature of Suit: 3410 Antitrust Termed: 02/14/2013 AT&T Mobility LLC, et al v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, et al Appeal From: U.S. District Court for Northern California, San Francisco Fee Status: Paid Case Type Information: 1) civil 2) private 3) null Originating Court Information: District: 0971-3 : 3:09-cv-04997-SI Court Reporter: Belle Ball Court Reporter: Joan Marie Columbini Trial Judge: Susan Illston, Senior District Judge Date Filed: 10/20/2009 Date Order/Judgment: Date Order/Judgment EOD: Date NOA Filed: Date Rec'd COA: 03/04/2011 03/04/2011 05/10/2011 05/10/2011 Prior Cases: None Current Cases: None AT&T MOBILITY, LLC CROWELL & MORING LLP Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery Street 23rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Crowell & Moring LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20004 Crowell & Moring LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20004 Crowell & Moring, LLP 40th Floor 515 South Flower Street Los Angeles, CA 90071 AT&T CORP.

Page 2 of 11 AT&T SERVICES, INC. BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY AT&T OPERATIONS, INC.

Page 3 of 11 AT&T DATACOMM, INC. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC. CHI MEI CORPORATION CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION

Page 4 of 11 CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC. CMO JAPAN CO., LTD. NEXGEN MEDIATECH, INC., "Nexgen" NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC. CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES LTD. TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC. Patrick J. Ahern, Attorney Direct: 312-861-3735 BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP One Prudential Plaza 3500 130 East Randolph Drive Chicago, IL 60601 Patrick J. Ahern, Attorney Direct: 312-861-3735 EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION Terminated: 11/29/2012 EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. Terminated: 11/29/2012 HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION Robert E. Freitas Direct: 650-593-6300 Freitas Tseng & Kaufman LLP 100 Marine Parkway Suite 200 Redwood City, CA 94065 Jason S. Angell, Attorney Direct: 650-593-6300 Freitas Tseng & Kaufman LLP 100 Marine Parkway Suite 200 Redwood City, CA 94065 LG DISPLAY CO., LTD. LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.

Page 5 of 11 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. SHARP CORPORATION Terminated: 02/14/2013 TOSHIBA CORPORATION TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, INC. TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION Terminated: 02/14/2013 ------------------------------ STATE OF CALIFORNIA Amicus Curiae, Emilio E. Varanini, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General Direct: 415-703-5908 [COR LD NTC Dep State Aty Gen] AGCA - OFFICE OF THE CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL 11th Floor 455 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102-7004

Page 6 of 11 AT&T MOBILITY LLC; AT&T CORP.; AT&T SERVICES, INC.; BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.; PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY; AT&T OPERATIONS, INC.; AT&T DATACOMM, INC.; SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, v. Plaintiffs - Appellants, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION; AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC; CHI MEI CORPORATION; CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION; CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC.; CMO JAPAN CO., LTD.; NEXGEN MEDIATECH, INC., "Nexgen"; NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC.; CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES LTD.; TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC.; EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION; EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION; LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.; LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; SHARP CORPORATION; SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; TOSHIBA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, INC.; TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.; TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants - Appellees.

Page 7 of 11 05/10/2011 1 Filed order (PAMELA ANN RYMER and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN) The motion for leave to file a reply to the answer to this petition is granted. The petition for permission to appeal pursuant to 28 USC 1292(b) is granted. Within 14 days of the date of this order, petitioner shall perfect the appeal in accordance with FRAP 5(d). [11-80070] [7747974] (GR) 05/11/2011 2 15 pg, 594 KB 05/18/2011 3 13 pg, 388.57 KB DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Fee due from Appellant AT&T Corp., Appellant AT&T Datacomm, Inc., Appellant AT&T Mobility LLC, Appellant AT&T Operations, Inc., Appellant AT&T Services, Inc., Appellant Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc., Appellant Pacific Bell Telephone Company and Appellant Southwestern Bell Telephone Company on 05/10/2011. Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/18/2011. Transcript ordered by 06/09/2011. Transcript due 07/11/2011. Appellant AT&T Corp., Appellant AT&T Datacomm, Inc., Appellant AT&T Mobility LLC, Appellant AT&T Operations, Inc., Appellant AT&T Services, Inc., Appellant Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc., Appellant Pacific Bell Telephone Company and Appellant Southwestern Bell Telephone Company opening brief due 08/18/2011. Appellee AU Optronics Corporation, Appellee Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc, Appellee CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Appellee Chi Mei Corporation, Appellee Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Appellee Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Appellee Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd., Appellee Epson Electronics America, Inc., Appellee Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Appellee Hannstar Display Corporation, Appellee LG Display America, Inc., Appellee LG Display Co., Ltd., Appellee Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., Appellee Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., Appellee Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Appellee Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Appellee Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Appellee Sharp Corporation, Appellee Sharp Electronics Corporation, Appellee Tatung Company of America, Inc., Appellee Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Appellee Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Appellee Toshiba Corporation and Appellee Toshiba Mobile Display Technology Co., Ltd. answering brief due 09/19/2011. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [7747979] (GR) Filed (ECF) Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/18/2011. [7756827] (JAM) 05/20/2011 4 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 11-16188: pd] ). [7760014] (RS) 05/25/2011 5 2 pg, 25.29 KB Filed order MEDIATION (VLS): Case not selected for mediation program. Counsel interested in obtaining settlement assistance or program information should contact the Mediation Office. [7764827] (KKW) 08/10/2011 6 14 day oral extension by phone of time to file the opening brief for Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company is granted. Appellants' opening brief due 09/01/2011. The answering briefs are due due 10/03/2011. The optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the last-served answering brief. [7851353] [11-16188] (AT) 08/10/2011 7 2 pg, 270.65 KB Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Ethan P. Schulman for Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. Date of service: 08/10/2011. [7852623] (EPS) 08/10/2011 8 Added attorney Ethan P. Schulman for Pacific Bell Telephone Company AT&T Services, Inc. AT&T Mobility LLC Southwestern Bell Telephone Company AT&T Operations, Inc. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. AT&T Datacomm, Inc. AT&T Corp., in case 11-16188. [7852910] (MT) 08/11/2011 9 2 pg, 61.44 KB 09/01/2011 10 33 pg, 1.47 MB Filed (ECF) Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Correspondence: Re: Court Granting Request to File Opening Brief on September 1, 2011. Date of service: 08/11/2011 [7853228] (EPS) Received Appellants' notification of filing under seal opening brief and Vol. 4 of excerpts of record, with DC protective orders attached. [7885172] (LA) 09/01/2011 11 Filed UNDER SEAL original and 7 copies of Appellants' (Informal: No) opening brief of 37 pages. Four copies Excerpts of record in 4 volumes (Vol. 4 FILED UNDER SEAL). Served on 09/01/2011. [7885175] --[Edited: Sealed brief and sent NDA. 09/07/2011 by RY] (LA) 09/08/2011 12 45 pg, 385.24 KB Submitted (ECF) Amicus Brief for review (by government or with consent per FRAP 29(a). Submitted by The State of California. Date of service: 09/08/2011. [7885268] --[COURT UPDATE: Replaced PDF of brief (to correct certificate of compliance). Edited docket text to reflect the content of the filing. Resent NDA. 09/09/2011 by DB] (EEV) 09/09/2011 13 Entered appearance of Amicus Curiae State of California. [7888283] (LA) 09/09/2011 14 2 pg, 81.61 KB Filed clerk order: The amicus brief [12] submitted by State of California is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, with a green cover, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. [7888296] (LA)

Page 8 of 11 09/12/2011 15 Received 7 paper copies of Amicus brief [12] filed by State of California. [7889641] (DB) 09/15/2011 16 5 pg, 27.23 KB Filed (ECF) Appellees Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation notice of joint brief (Answering). Date of service: 09/15/2011. [7895287] (RST) 09/15/2011 17 Filed notice of joint brief by Appellees AU Optronics Corporation, Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc, CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd., Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, LG Display America, Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Tatung Company of America, Inc., Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba Mobile Display Technology Co., Ltd. due 10/24/2011. Five additional pages are authorized or 1400 words. Optional reply brief due 14 days after date of service of answering brief.. --[COURT UPDATE: Edited docket text to reflect correct listing of parties. Resent NDA. 09/15/2011 by DB] [7895416] (MT) 10/24/2011 18 57 pg, 138.94 KB Submitted (ECF) Answering brief for review. Submitted by Appellees by Appellees AU Optronics Corporation, Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc, CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd., Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, LG Display America, Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Tatung Company of America, Inc., Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba Mobile Display Technology Co., Ltd.. Date of service: 10/24/2011. [7939971]--[COURT UPDATE: Edited docket text to reflect correct party filers. Resent NDA. 10/24/2011 by RY] (RST) 10/24/2011 20 Filed Appellees' Supplemental Excerpts of Record in 1 volume. Served on 10/24/11 [7942142] (GV) 10/25/2011 19 1 pg, 82.55 KB Filed clerk order: The Joint Answering brief [18] submitted by Appellees is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, with a red cover, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. [7941156] (GV) 10/26/2011 21 Received 7 paper copies of Joint Answering brief [18] filed by Appellees. [7944623] (SD) 11/02/2011 22 Oral extension by phone of time to file optional reply brief. Appellants reply brief due November 25, 2011. [7951192] (TH) 11/02/2011 23 1 pg, 23.38 KB 11/22/2011 24 38 pg, 175.43 KB 11/22/2011 25 1 pg, 81.54 KB Filed (ECF) Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Correspondence: Appellants' 14-Day Extention to File Reply Brief Granted. Date of service: 11/02/2011 [7951327] (EPS) Submitted (ECF) Reply brief for review. Submitted by Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. Date of service: 11/22/2011. [7976559] (EPS) Filed clerk order: The reply brief [24] submitted by appellants is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, with a gray cover, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. [7976691] (RH) 11/29/2011 26 Received 7 paper copies of Reply brief [24] filed by Appellants. [7982157] (SD) 02/14/2012 27 1 pg, 332.73 KB Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Christopher M. Lynch for Appellees LG Display America, Inc. and LG Display Co., Ltd.. Date of service: 02/14/2012. [8067948] (CML) 02/14/2012 28 Added attorney Christopher Marisak Lynch for LG Display Co., Ltd. LG Display America, Inc., in case 11-16188. [8068213] (MT) 02/14/2012 29 1 pg, 330.91 KB 02/14/2012 30 6 pg, 59.54 KB 03/12/2012 31 5 pg, 30.7 KB Filed (ECF) Appellees LG Display America, Inc. and LG Display Co., Ltd. Correspondence: Certificate of Service re Notice of Appearance of Counsel. Date of service: 02/14/2012 [8068437] (CML) Filed (ECF) Appellees LG Display America, Inc. and LG Display Co., Ltd. Motion for 46-5 exemption. Date of service: 02/14/2012. [8068909] (CML) Filed order (Appellate Commissioner) Appellees LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc., have filed a motion for exemption from Ninth Circuit Rule 46-5 for counsel Christopher M. Lynch, Esq. The motion is granted as to pending appeal No. 11-16188 and denied as moot as to the following petitions and closed appeals: Nos. 10-16182; 10-16215; 10-71745; and 11-80128. The court declines to entertain this motion in case Nos. 11-16862, 11-80051, and 11-80129 because LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. are not parties in those cases. Briefing is complete in appeal No. 11-16188.(MOATT) [8098800] [10-16182, 10-16215, 10-71745, 11-16188, 11-80128] (KKW)

Page 9 of 11 08/10/2012 32 Added attorney Derek Foran, Melvin R. Goldman, Stephen P. Freccero for Epson Imaging Devices Corporation Epson Electronics America, Inc., in case 11-16188. [8283469] (HH) 08/10/2012 33 Added attorney Christopher Hockett for Nexgen Mediatech, Inc. Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc. Chi Mei Corporation CMO Japan Co., Ltd. Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., in case 11-16188. [8283475] (HH) 08/10/2012 34 Added attorney Carl L. Blumenstein, Christopher A. Nedeau for Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc AU Optronics Corporation, in case 11-16188. [8283483] (HH) 09/10/2012 35 9 pg, 447.43 KB 09/13/2012 36 1 pg, 29.08 KB 09/14/2012 37 1 pg, 54.07 KB 09/28/2012 38 2 pg, 657.94 KB Notice of Oral Argument on Friday, November 9, 2012-9:30 AM - Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor - James R. Browning US Courthouse - San Francisco, California. Please return ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE form to: SAN FRANCISCO Office. Please open attached documents to view details about your case. [8317221] (RB) Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice. Location: San Francisco. Filed by Attorney Richard S. Taffet for Appellees Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation. [8323036] (RST) Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice. Location: San Francisco. Filed by Attorney Mr. Ethan P. Schulman, Esquire for Appellants Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and AT&T Operations, Inc.. [8324402] (EPS) Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Harrison J. Frahn IV for Appellees CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc. and Nexgen Mediatech, Inc.. Date of service: 09/28/2012. [8341782] (HF) 09/28/2012 39 Attorneys Christopher Hocket substituted by Attorney Harrison Frahn,in 11-16188 [8341914] (MT) 10/02/2012 40 16 pg, 252.9 KB 10/03/2012 41 1 pg, 28.61 KB 10/12/2012 42 2 pg, 30.98 KB 10/12/2012 43 21 pg, 125.67 KB 10/23/2012 44 32 pg, 1.66 MB 10/26/2012 45 7 pg, 21.52 KB 10/31/2012 46 1 pg, 345.84 KB 10/31/2012 47 1 pg, 68.91 KB Filed (ECF) Amicus Curiae State of California Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion for Leave of Amicus Curiae The State of California to Participate in Oral Argument]. Date of service: 10/02/2012. [8344812] (EEV) Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KKW): Amicus curiae the State of California s motion to participate in oral argument is hereby GRANTED. Fed. R. App. P. 39(g). The State is allocated five of the fifteen minutes of oral argument time allotted to the Plaintiff-Appellants, unless Plaintiff-Appellants and the State agree between themselves on a different allocation of their oral argument time, and so inform the court at the commencement of oral argument. [8347245] (KKW) Filed (ECF) Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 10/12/2012. [8357966] (EPS) Filed (ECF) Appellees Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation Motion to take judicial notice of, Motion to supplement record on appeal. Date of service: 10/12/2012. [8358213] (RST) Filed (ECF) Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Motion to take judicial notice of, Motion to file supplemental excerpts of record. Date of service: 10/23/2012. [8373530] (EPS) Filed (ECF) Appellees Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation response to motion (,motion to take judicial notice,motion to file supplemental excerpts of record). Date of service: 10/26/2012. [8377753] (RST) Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice. Location: San Francisco. Filed by Attorney Mr. Emilio E. Varanini, Esquire for Amicus Curiae State of California. [8382442] (EEV) Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice. Location: San Francisco. Filed by Attorney Mr. Emilio E. Varanini, Esquire for Amicus Curiae State of California. [8382461] (EEV) 11/09/2012 48 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO RONALD M. GOULD, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY. [8396184] (ER) 11/28/2012 49 2 pg, 648.22 KB Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Robert E. Freitas Jason S. Angell for Appellee Hannstar Display Corporation. Date of service: 11/28/2012. [8417504] (REF) 11/28/2012 50 Added attorney Robert E. Freitas for Hannstar Display Corporation, in case 11-16188. [8417566] (MT) 11/28/2012 51 Added attorney Jason S. Angell for Hannstar Display Corporation, in case 11-16188. [8417724] (MT) 11/29/2012 52 4 pg, 13.05 KB 11/29/2012 Filed (ECF) Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Motion to dismiss party from case. Date of service: 11/29/2012. [8418987] (EPS)

Page 10 of 11 53 1 pg, 25.36 KB Filed order (RONALD M. GOULD, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY) The parties Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal of Appeal as to Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc. (D.E. 52) is GRANTED. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice with respect to those two Appellees only. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney s fees on appeal, pursuant to their stipulation. This order serves as the mandate as to the named parties. [8420441] (KKW) 11/29/2012 54 Terminated Appellees Epson Electronics America, Inc. and Epson Imaging Devices Corporation in 11-16188 [8420442] (KKW) 01/09/2013 55 5 pg, 15.82 KB 01/22/2013 56 8 pg, 124.55 KB 01/24/2013 57 2 pg, 26.99 KB Filed (ECF) Appellees Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation Stipulated Motion to dismiss party from case. Date of service: 01/09/2013. [8467356] (RST) Filed (ECF) Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Stipulated Motion to dismiss party from case. Date of service: 01/22/2013. [8482298] (EPS) Filed order (RONALD M. GOULD, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY) The parties Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal of Appeal as to LG Display Co. Ltd.; LG Display America, Inc.; AU Optronics Corporation; AU Optronics Corporation America; Toshiba Corporation; Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.; Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.; Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd.; Chi Mei Corporation; Chi Mei Innolux Corporation (f/k/a Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation); Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co., Ltd.; Nexgen Mediatech, Inc.; Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc.; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (D.E. 56) is GRANTED. [8485700] (KKW) 01/24/2013 58 Terminated Appellees AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., LG Display America, Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba Mobile Display Technology Co., Ltd. in 11-16188 [8485746] (KKW) 02/14/2013 59 1 pg, 25.12 KB 02/14/2013 60 1 pg, 24.57 KB 02/14/2013 61 22 pg, 490.77 KB 02/26/2013 62 2 pg, 222.05 KB 03/11/2013 63 1 pg, 83.16 KB Filed order (RONALD M. GOULD, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY) The parties Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal of Appeal as to Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation only (D.E. 55) is GRANTED. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees on appeal, pursuant to their stipulation. This order shall serve as the mandate of the court as to Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation. [8513832] (RP) Filed order (RONALD M. GOULD, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY)Appellees Motion to Take Judicial Notice and Supplement Record on Appeal (D.E. 43) is DENIED. Appellants Motion to Take Judicial Notice and Supplement Record on Appeal (D.E. 44) is DENIED. [8513866] (RP) FILED OPINION (RONALD M. GOULD, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY) REVERSED AND REMANDED. Judge: MDS Authoring, FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [8513877] (RP) Filed (ECF) Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company bill of costs (Form 10) in the amount of 404.20 USD. Date of service: 02/26/2013 [8526281] (EPS) MANDATE ISSUED.(RMG, MDS and KTD) Costs taxed against Appellee in the amount of $404.20. [8544435] (EL)

Page 11 of 11 Clear All Documents and Docket Summary Documents Only Include Page Numbers Selected Pages: 0 Selected Size: 0 KB View Selected

2024 © financedocbox.com Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Feedback