Income Differences and Health Care Expenditures over the Life Cycle

Similar documents
Medicaid Insurance and Redistribution in Old Age

Saving During Retirement

Sang-Wook (Stanley) Cho

Preventive vs. Curative Medicine: A Macroeconomic Analysis of Health Care. over the Life Cycle

Andreas Fagereng. Charles Gottlieb. Luigi Guiso

Sang-Wook (Stanley) Cho

Health Insurance Reform: The impact of a Medicare Buy-In

HOUSEHOLD DEBT AND CREDIT CONSTRAINTS: COMPARATIVE MICRO EVIDENCE FROM FOUR OECD COUNTRIES

Life Cycle Responses to Health Insurance Status

AGGREGATE IMPLICATIONS OF WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION: THE CASE OF INFLATION

The Macroeconomics of Universal Health Insurance Vouchers

Taxation of Earnings and the Impact on Labor Supply and Human Capital. Discussion by Henrik Kleven (LSE)

Does the Social Safety Net Improve Welfare? A Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis

Reformulating the Support Ratio to Reflect Asset Income and Transfers (Extended Abstract)

Wealth Inequality Reading Summary by Danqing Yin, Oct 8, 2018

Consumption and House Prices in the Great Recession: Model Meets Evidence

Household Heterogeneity in Macroeconomics

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES GENDER, MARRIAGE, AND LIFE EXPECTANCY. Margherita Borella Mariacristina De Nardi Fang Yang

Evaluating Lump Sum Incentives for Delayed Social Security Claiming*

Discussion on Credit Cards and Consumption By Scott Fulford and Scott Schuh

EC 324: Macroeconomics (Advanced)

Home Production and Social Security Reform

Online Appendix. Revisiting the Effect of Household Size on Consumption Over the Life-Cycle. Not intended for publication.

Topic 11: Measuring Inequality and Poverty

Financing Medicare: A General Equilibrium Analysis

PUBLIC HEALTH CARE CONSUMPTION: TRAGEDY OF THE COMMONS OR

Econ 100B: Macroeconomic Analysis Fall 2008

Health Care: Obama Officials Look Back at the ACA and the Path Forward

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD

Aggregate Implications of Wealth Redistribution: The Case of Inflation

Inheritances and Inequality across and within Generations

Is the Aging of Society a Threat to Japan?

Financing National Health Insurance and Challenge of Fast Population Aging: The Case of Taiwan

Housing Prices and Growth

The 2008 Statistics on Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage by Gary Burtless THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION

The Intertemporal Keynesian Cross. Auclert-Rognlie-Straub

Fertility, Human Capital, and Economic Growth over the Demographic Transition

Health Care Reform or Labor Market Reform? A Quantitative Analysis of the Affordable Care Act

How Much Insurance in Bewley Models?

. Social Security Actuarial Balance in General Equilibrium. S. İmrohoroğlu (USC) and S. Nishiyama (CBO)

Achieving Actuarial Balance in Social Security: Measuring the Welfare Effects on Individuals

ECNS 303 Ch. 16: Consumption

Economic Life Cycle Deficit and Intergenerational Transfers in Italy: An Analysis Using National Transfer Accounts Methodology

Population Age Structure Changes and Demographic Dividend in Viet Nam: Findings from NTA Approach

DIFFERENTIAL MORTALITY, UNCERTAIN MEDICAL EXPENSES, AND THE SAVING OF ELDERLY SINGLES

Income inequality an insufficient consumption in China. Li Gan Southwestern University of Finance and Economics Texas A&M University

Understanding Longevity Risk Annuitization Decisionmaking: An Interdisciplinary Investigation of Financial and Nonfinancial Triggers of Annuity Demand

Toshiko Kaneda, PhD Population Reference Bureau (PRB) James Kirby, PhD Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

EXAM 3: Version A. Econ 2203 Fall Instructions:

Notes - Gruber, Public Finance Chapter 13 Basic things you need to know about SS. SS is essentially a public annuity, it gives insurance against low

The Effect of Uncertain Labor Income and Social Security on Life-cycle Portfolios

The Affordable Care Act: Seven Years Later

Macroeconomics II Consumption

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (P.L )

Household Income Distribution and Working Time Patterns. An International Comparison

Net Government Expenditures and the Economic Well-Being of the Elderly in the United States,

Wealth and Welfare: Breaking the Generational Contract

cepr Analysis of the Upcoming Release of 2003 Data on Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Data Brief Paper Heather Boushey 1 August 2004

Topic 2: Consumption

Explaining Consumption Excess Sensitivity with Near-Rationality:

Social Security and the rise in Health Spending

Lorant Kaszab (MNB) Roman Horvath (IES)

Retirement Saving, Annuity Markets, and Lifecycle Modeling. James Poterba 10 July 2008

Economic effects of population ageing on India s public finance: Evidence and implications based on National Transfer Accounts

Estimating a Life Cycle Model with Unemployment and Human Capital Depreciation

Labor Economics Field Exam Spring 2014

Macroeconomic Effects of Medicare

Intergenerational Transfers and Old-Age Security in Korea

Fact Sheet March, 2012

Keynesian Views On The Fiscal Multiplier

Business Cycles and Household Formation: The Micro versus the Macro Labor Elasticity

Wealth inequality, family background, and estate taxation

Are you prepared for retirement?

Private Reallocations. Andrew Mason

Understanding the Distributional Impact of Long-Run Inflation. August 2011

The Implications of a Greying Japan for Public Policy.

Family and Government Insurance: Wage, Earnings, and Income Risks in the Netherlands and the U.S.

Notes on Obstfeld-Rogoff Ch.1

Reflections on capital taxation

Balancing Adequacy and Sustainability Insights from the Global Aging Preparedness Index

Social Insurance, Private Health Insurance and Individual Welfare

consumption = 2/3 GDP in US uctuations the aect booms and recessions 4.2 John Maynard Keynes - Consumption function

Inclusive growth in Russia: Achievements and Challenges

PART 4 - ARMENIA: SUBJECTIVE POVERTY IN 2006

Exchange Rates and Fundamentals: A General Equilibrium Exploration

Low Fertility, Rapid Aging and Fiscal Challenges with the Presence of Informal Employment

14.02 Principles of Macroeconomics Problem Set # 2, Answers

Fiscal Policy. Fiscal Policy. Mark Huggett. Georgetown University. March 2, 2018

Balance Sheet Recessions

Subsidies in the fiscal system would be considerably understated if one

Household Finance in China

Asset Rich, but Income Poor: Australian Housing Wealth and Retirement in International Context

Are Americans Saving Optimally for Retirement?

Tax Benefit Linkages in Pension Systems (a note) Monika Bütler DEEP Université de Lausanne, CentER Tilburg University & CEPR Λ July 27, 2000 Abstract

Aviation Economics & Finance

The Distribution of Federal Taxes, Jeffrey Rohaly

Discussion by J.C.Rochet (SFI,UZH and TSE) Prepared for the Swissquote Conference 2012 on Liquidity and Systemic Risk

Reforming Medicaid Long Term Care Insurance

Medicaid: A Lower-Cost Approach to Serving a High-Cost Population

The Distributions of Income and Consumption. Risk: Evidence from Norwegian Registry Data

Transcription:

Income Differences and Health Care Expenditures over the Life Cycle Serdar Ozkan Federal Reserve Board August 5, 2011

Motivation How do the low- and high-income households differ in the lifetime profile of medical expenditures (consumption)?

Motivation Figure: Average Medical Spending of Bottom Income Quntile Relative to Top Income Quintile

Motivation How do the low- and high-income households differ in the lifetime profile of medical expenditures (consumption)? Why do they differ?

Motivation How do the low- and high-income households differ in the lifetime profile of medical expenditures (consumption)? Why do they differ? Why is it important? The ObamaCare aims to reduce the disparities in health outcomes. Expanding health insurance coverage to the poor. Private insurance firms will provide basic preventive services free of charge.

Outline Empirical Facts on Differences in Health Care Usage A Life-Cycle Model of Health Capital Calibration/Estimation Counter-Factual Policy Experiments

Empirical Facts on Differences in Health Care Usage 1. Medical spending of the poor relative to the rich exhibits humped-shaped pattern over the lifecycle.

Empirical Facts on Differences in Health Care Usage 1. Medical spending of the poor relative to the rich exhibits humped-shaped pattern over the lifecycle. 2. The distribution of medical expenditures of the poor is more widely spread to the tails.

Empirical Facts on Differences in Health Care Usage

Empirical Facts on Differences in Health Care Usage 1. Medical spending of the poor relative to the rich exhibits humped-shaped pattern over the lifecycle. 2. The distribution of medical expenditures of the poor is more widely spread to the tails. A higher fraction of the poor does not incur any medical expenditures in a year (24% vs 10%). Health care spending of the poor is more extreme. 3. The poor use less preventive care.

Empirical Facts on Differences in Health Care Usage 1. Medical spending of the poor relative to the rich exhibits humped-shaped pattern over the lifecycle. 2. The distribution of medical expenditures of the poor is more widely spread to the tails. A higher fraction of the poor does not incur any medical expenditures in a year (24% vs 10%). Health care spending of the poor is more extreme. 3. The poor use less preventive care. 4. The life expectancy of the poor is dramatically shorter.

A Life-Cycle Model of Health Capital 1. Two distinct types of health capital Physical health capital determines the survival probability Preventive health capital governs the distribution of health shocks Endogenous distribution of health shocks, thereby endogenous life expectancy.

A Life-Cycle Model of Health Capital 1. Two distinct types of health capital 2. Important features of the US health care system Non-elderly are offered private health insurance with copayment and deductible. Endogenous insurance premia. Children of the poor are covered by Medicaid All elderly are covered by Medicare. In case of severe health shocks, default is allowed.

A Life-Cycle Model of Health Capital 1. Two distinct types of health capital 2. Important features of the US health care system 3. Government budget balances Progressive US tax scheme on income Finances social security, Medicaid, Medicare Budget surplus or deficit is distributed in a lump sum fashion

Estimate Model Using Micro and Macro Data 1. Set some of the parameter values outside of the model income process deductible - co-payment coverage schemes, etc.

Estimate Model Using Micro and Macro Data 1. Set some of the parameter values outside of the model 2. Match model moments to data moments From the MEPS Distribution of medical expenditures Differences in the lifetime profile of health care spending From aggregate data Age profile of conditional survival probability Differences in life expectancy between the rich and the poor Wealth to income ratio, etc.

Counter-Factual Policy Analysis Universal Health Insurance Coverage Government provides all non-elderly private health insurance. To finance this policy an additional flat income tax is imposed on household income. All elderly are still covered by Medicare.

Counter-Factual Policy Analysis Universal Health Insurance Coverage Table: Life Expectancy Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Benchmark 71.95 75.2 76.3 76.5 76.8 Policy I 73.2 75.3 76.3 76.5 76.8 Aggregate medical spending increases by only 0.8% Per capita medical expenditures increase from $4750 to $4755

Counter-Factual Policy Analysis Universal Health Insurance Coverage Health insurance premia decrease 2.5% for 30-year old and younger. Increase 1.5% for older than 30.

Counter-Factual Policy Analysis Universal Health Insurance Coverage Welfare Analysis T T E β t 1 s(ht B ω t)u(ct B, ht B ω t) = E β t 1 s(ht P ω t)u(φct P, ht P ω t) t=1 t=1

Counter-Factual Policy Analysis Universal Health Insurance Coverage Welfare Analysis T T E β t 1 s(ht B ω t)u(ct B, ht B ω t) = E β t 1 s(ht P ω t)u(φct P, ht P ω t) t=1 1 φ = 1.5% t=1

Counter-Factual Policy Analysis Universal Health Insurance Coverage Welfare Analysis T T E β t 1 s(ht B ω t)u(ct B, ht B ω t) = E β t 1 s(ht P ω t)u(φct P, ht P ω t) t=1 1 φ = 1.5% 1/3 of welfare gains are due to the increase in life expectancy t=1

Counter-Factual Policy Analysis Universal Health Insurance Coverage Welfare Analysis T T E β t 1 s(ht B ω t)u(ct B, ht B ω t) = E β t 1 s(ht P ω t)u(φct P, ht P ω t) t=1 1 φ = 1.5% 1/3 of welfare gains are due to the increase in life expectancy t=1 Table: Welfare Gains, 1 φ Bottom 2% Median Top 2% Policy I w.r.t Benchmark 0.6% 2.1% -0.88%

Counter-Factual Policy Analysis Free Basic Preventive Care Mammograms, colonoscopies, cervical screenings, and treatment for high blood pressure etc. Patients will still have to pay for doctor visits. Not all preventive care is covered

Counter-Factual Policy Analysis Free Basic Preventive Care Mammograms, colonoscopies, cervical screenings, and treatment for high blood pressure etc. Patients will still have to pay for doctor visits. Not all preventive care is covered Policy Experiment: Private insurance pays 75% of preventive care expenditures.

Counter-Factual Policy Analysis Free Basic Preventive Care Mammograms, colonoscopies, cervical screenings, and treatment for high blood pressure etc. Patients will still have to pay for doctor visits. Not all preventive care is covered Policy Experiment: Private insurance pays 75% of preventive care expenditures. Policy change takes place in universal health insurance economy

Counter-Factual Policy Analysis Free Basic Preventive Care Fraction of preventive spending in total health care expenditures increase from 22% to 39%.

Counter-Factual Policy Analysis Free Basic Preventive Care Fraction of preventive spending in total health care expenditures increase from 22% to 39%. Table: Life Expectancy Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Benchmark 71.95 75.2 76.3 76.5 76.8 Policy I 73.2 75.3 76.3 76.5 76.8 Policy II 74.65 75.9 76.5 76.6 76.8

Counter-Factual Policy Analysis Free Basic Preventive Care Fraction of preventive spending in total health care expenditures increase from 22% to 39%. Table: Life Expectancy Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Benchmark 71.95 75.2 76.3 76.5 76.8 Policy I 73.2 75.3 76.3 76.5 76.8 Policy II 74.65 75.9 76.5 76.6 76.8 Aggregate medical spending DOES NOT increase! Per capita medical expenditures decrease from $4755 to $4738.

Counter-Factual Policy Analysis Free Basic Preventive Care Welfare Analysis T T E β t 1 s(ht B ω t)u(ct B, ht B ω t) = E β t 1 s(ht P ω t)u(φct P, ht P ω t) t=1 t=1

Counter-Factual Policy Analysis Free Basic Preventive Care Welfare Analysis T T E β t 1 s(ht B ω t)u(ct B, ht B ω t) = E β t 1 s(ht P ω t)u(φct P, ht P ω t) t=1 1 φ = 2.5% t=1 Table: Welfare Gains, 1 φ Bottom 2% Median Top 2% Policy I w.r.t Benchmark 0.6% 2.1% -0.88% Policy II w.r.t Benchmark 0.35% 3.13% -1.2% Policy II w.r.t Policy I -0.24% 1.105% -0.29%

Conclusion Subtle differences in the lifetime profile of medical expenditures between low and high income groups. The young rich spend more on health care whereas medical spending of the old poor is larger in absolute terms.

Conclusion Subtle differences in the lifetime profile of medical expenditures between low and high income groups. The young rich spend more on health care whereas medical spending of the old poor is larger in absolute terms. Public insurance (Medicaid, Medicare, default option) can explain these differences: enables the poor to incur medical spending higher than their income. hampers incentives of the poor to use preventive care.

Conclusion Subtle differences in the lifetime profile of medical expenditures between low and high income groups. The young rich spend more on health care whereas medical spending of the old poor is larger in absolute terms. Public insurance (Medicaid, Medicare, default option) can explain these differences: enables the poor to incur medical spending higher than their income. hampers incentives of the poor to use preventive care. Policies encouraging the use of health care by the poor early in life have significant welfare gains.