United States Attorney Northern District of Illinois. THURSDAY DECEMBER 16, 2004 AUSA/PIO Randall Samborn (312)

Similar documents
TWO DUFF FAMILY MEMBERS AMONG SEVEN INDICTED IN ALLEGED CITY CONTRACT AND WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE FRAUD SCHEMES

THURSDAY APRIL 8, 2004 Randall Samborn, AUSA/PIO (312) Kerry Hannigan, IRS-CID (312)

THURSDAY JUNE 28, 2012 AUSA Brandon Fox U.S. Attorney s Press Office

OKALOOSA SHERIFF PRAISES WORK OF NEW MORTGAGE FRAUD TASK FORCE

THURSDAY MAY 22, 2008 AUSA Juliet Sorensen (312) AUSA Christina Egan (312) Randall Samborn (312)

Attorney General Corbett announces arrest of four Scranton area residents in connection with $7.5 million insurance pyramid scheme

- 1 - IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF

Conflict-of-Interest Issues -- Meeting the Challenges

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. No. INDICTMENT UNDER SEAL COUNT ONE

OPERATION CASH-OUT CHARGES 45 DEFENDANTS IN INTERNATIONAL MONEY LAUNDERING AND BRIBERY SCHEMES

An appeal from an order of the Department of Management Services.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Office of the Inspector General Metropolitan Transportation Authority Two Penn Plaza, 5 th Floor New York, New York

United States Attorney Sally Quillian Yates Northern District of Georgia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : Hon. INDICTMENT

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY S OFFICE Southern District of New York

2018 NSAA Annual Conference

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF ARREST WARRANT. BEFORE ME,, Judge of the Circuit Court, in and

Thailand. Douglas Mancill and Wayu Suthisarnsuntorn. Deacons (Price Sanond Prabhas & Wynne Ltd)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. WM Appellee Trial Court No.

Case Studies. COURSE X: MASTERING THE LOAN APPLICATION II Lesson 1: Mortgage Fraud. Case Study 1

STATEMENT OF DANIEL BOGDEN UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, DISTRICT OF NEVADA BEFORE THE FINANCIAL CRISIS INQUIRY COMMISSION ENTITLED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2006

Case 1:14-cr SOM Document 119 Filed 06/05/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1032

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Does a Taxpayer Have the Burden of Showing Intent to Divert Corporate Funds as Return of Capital?

Bribery and Corruption

. 1 'UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D.C

FCPA. Due Diligence. The REPORT. The Importance of Pre-Merger Due Diligence

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS

Case 1:05-cr RWR Document 1 Filed 08/04/2005 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:18-cr JS Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

Liechtenstein. I. Brief Introduction to the Legal System of Liechtenstein

Operator Of Unlawful Bitcoin Exchange Sentenced To More Than 5 Years In Prison For Leading Multimillion-Dollar Money Laundering And Fraud Scheme

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION

CASE NO CR CASE NO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS

STATE OF FLORIDA FLORIDA ELECTIONS COMMISSION

Gerald Cassioppi, Ethics Commission Chairman Dan Hanlon, Ethics Adviser Rick Veenstra, Deputy Chief Assistant State s Attorney October 7, 2015

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INDICTMENT COUNT ONE BACKGROUND

Employee Benefit Plans DOL Criminal Enforcement Cases April 2009 November 2011

Follow this and additional works at:

Case 1:10-cr BEL Document 1 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 16

Case 1:12-cr WYD Document 1 Filed 10/24/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:14-cr PLM Doc #1 Filed 07/24/14 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT. Introduction

DAVID MAKOL, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and charges as follows: COUNT ONE

STATE OF OHIO MACK THOMAS, JR.

United States Attorney Southern District of New York

Case 2:13-cr ES Document 11 Filed 11/18/13 Page 1 of 35 PageID: 62

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

DEKALB COUNTY GOVERNMENT ETHICS POLICY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L Trial Court No.

LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION CITY OF CHICAGO

JUDGMENT. [1] In the Court a quo the appellant was refused bail by the Port Elizabeth

Forfeiture: Stripping Criminals of Ill-Gotten Gains. Jason Wojdylo, CFE Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.

Deputies Entanglement in Financial Crimes During Economic Downturn

Members of the Independent Review Board. Members of the Local 705 Executive Board. An investigation has been conducted concerning financial

GUIDANCE NOTE TO SCOTLAND S COLLEGES AND COLLEGE BOARDS OF MANAGEMENT ON THE BRIBERY ACT 2010

Full Text of Sample Construction Defect Law and Litigation Articles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

POLICY REGULATING POLITICAL ACTIVITIES AND THE SOLICITATION AND ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

White Collar. Criminal Defense & Internal Investigations Practice. Practical Wisdom, Trusted Advice.

Case 1:17-cr ABJ Document 471 Filed 01/08/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THE UNITED STATES GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT: INTRODUCTION

LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION CITY OF CHICAGO

COURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 22, 2005

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

I nsurance brokers and investment banks have at

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 19, 2012

COLLECTION AGENCIES ACT

Felony Insurance Fraud Offenses 2015 Annual Report

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. v. : CRIMINAL NO GOVERNMENT'S GUILTY PLEA MEMORANDUM

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA : O P I N I O N -vs- 6/14/2004 :

PTC Commitment to Ethical Standards and Practices

Attorney's Office District of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. The United States Department of Justice alleges that:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE

ARNOLD PORTER (UK) LLP

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Case 2:12-cr SD Document 1 Filed 04/10/12 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:12-cr CM Document 1 Filed 04/18/12 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (KANSAS CITY DOCKET)

CONTINENTAL REINSURANCE ANTI-BRIBERY & CORRUPTION POLICY COMPLIANCE AND SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES

Anti-Bribery Policy. Copyright Oceanscan All rights reserved 2012 Page 1 of 5

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY. : O P I N I O N - vs - 2/10/2014 :

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : No. 691, Disciplinary Docket No.

MEASUREMENT OF SSSC ANTI CORRUPTION

U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Branch Alexandria, VA 22302

ALI-ABA Topical Courses Offshore Tax Evasion & Bank Secrecy Update September 13, 2010 Telephone Seminar/Audio Webcast. Indictment

FINAL NOTICE. 3. For the reasons listed below, the Authority has decided to refuse the Application.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Case 3:12-cr HZ Document 25 Filed 04/24/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Court of Criminal Appeals April 22, 2015

Transcription:

U. S. Department of Justice Patrick J. Fitzgerald United States Attorney United States Attorney Northern District of Illinois Federal Building 219 South Dearborn Street, Fifth Floor Chicago, Illinois 60604 (312) 353-5300 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE PRESS CONTACT: THURSDAY DECEMBER 16, 2004 AUSA/PIO Randall Samborn (312)353-5318 FOUR FORMER CITY WATER DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS, THREE TRUCKING FIRM OPERATORS INDICTED IN HIRED TRUCK CORRUPTION PROBE CHICAGO A former City of Chicago Water Department official and three subordinates accused of acting as his bagmen were indicted today, together with three trucking company operators, for allegedly engaging in racketeering, fraud and bribery that netted the city officials at least $500,000 in cash, campaign contributions and gifts in return for providing preferential treatment to 10 trucking companies that participated in the city s Hired Truck Program over more than a decade. A federal grand jury returned a 12-count indictment against a total of seven defendants two former city officials and a trucking firm operator who were arrested in October, and two additional former city officials and two other trucking firm operators who were charged for the first time in the indictment. The case marks the first grand jury indictment returned in the investigation that became public 11 months ago and now has charged a total of 14 defendants, announced Patrick J. Fitzgerald, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois. The indictment alleges Hired Truck Program (HTP) corruption in the city s Water Department, now the Department of Water Management, from 1993 to September 2004. The defendants are Donald Tomczak, who retired in January 2004 as First Deputy Commissioner, and Gerald Wesolowski, who was Director of Finance and Administration and reported to Tomczak,

both of whom were charged previously, and new defendants and former Tomczak subordinates Roger McMahon, who retired in 1998 as the Director of Finance and Administration and later was a part-time consultant for the city and continued to take periodic direction from Tomczak, and Flenory Barnes, Sr., who held various positions in the Water and Sewer departments before he retired as Deputy Sewer Commissioner in 2003. Also indicted were previous defendant Joseph S. Ignoffo, who operated Ignoffo Trucking Co., and new defendants Leroy Peters and his daughter, Commelie Peters, both of whom at different times operated LR&C Truck Line. Tomczak, 69, of Crest Hill, and Wesolowski, 46, of Chicago, were charged together with one count each of racketeering conspiracy and bribery and two counts of obstruction of justice. In addition, Tomczak was charged with six counts of mail fraud and Wesolowski with two counts of mail fraud. McMahon, 77, of Chicago, and Barnes, 66, of Las Vegas and formerly of Chicago, and Ignoffo, 42, of Niles, were each charged with one count of mail fraud. Leroy Peters, 63, of Crete, and Commelie Peters, 37, of Chicago, were each charged with one count of mail fraud and one count of bribery, while Commelie Peters was also charged with one count of perjury. Tomczak, Wesolowski and Ignoffo were each released on bond after they were arrested and charged separately in October. All seven defendants will be arraigned at a later date in U.S. District Court. This indictment combines every key element of bribe-paying corrupt public officials who sold city benefits to fuel personal and political greed; corrupt city vendors who paid bribes to earn greater profit; and defendants who lied and obstructed the investigation to avoid being caught, Mr. Fitzgerald said. In operating the Water Department as a racketeering enterprise, Tomczak required 2

truck contractors to pay him cash bribes, to make campaign contributions to candidates he favored, and to amass a political army to work on behalf of those candidates. Mr. Fitzgerald announced the charges with Kenneth T. Laag, Acting Inspector-in-Charge of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service in Chicago; J.D. Nichols, Special Agent-in-Charge of the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General in Chicago; Richard K. Ruminski, Acting Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and Sybil Smith, Acting Special Agent-in-Charge of the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation Division in Chicago. The investigation is continuing, they said. The HTP allowed the city s Water, Sewer, Transportation, and Streets and Sanitation departments to hire trucking services on an as-needed basis to supplement construction projects and daily operations. Hired trucks removed about 600,000 tons of excavated material and delivered about 400,000 tons of construction materials for the Water Department annually, while also delivering and removing about 300,000 tons of material for the CDOT s street resurfacing program. According to the city, it spent close to $38 million in 2003 on hired trucks involving approximately 172 different vendors citywide. From 1997 through 2003, the Water Department spent approximately $8 million to $11.7 million annually for hired truck services. From 1989 to late 2003, Tomczak, as first deputy commissioner, exercised ultimate authority as to selecting, assigning, hiring and laying off participating HTP trucking companies. The racketeering conspiracy count against Tomczak and Wesolowski alleges that they conducted the affairs of the Water Department as a racketeering enterprise by engaging in a pattern of fraud, extortion, bribery and obstruction of justice between 1993 and 2004. Their purpose allegedly was to make official decisions relating to the HTP, provide cash payments and campaign 3

contributions, and to divert and use city resources all for the personal and financial benefit of themselves and others, including certain city employees, certain trucking company operators, and other parties affiliated with Tomczak, including political campaigns. The indictment seeks forfeiture of $500,000 from Tomczak and Wesolowski as proceeds of the alleged racketeering conspiracy. All seven defendants are allegedly subject to forfeiture of at least $500,000 if convicted of mail fraud, and the indictment also seeks forfeiture from Ignoffo and each of the Peters relating to their respective financial interests in their trucking companies. According to the fraud scheme allegations, Tomczak, together with Wesolowski and McMahon working at Tomczak s direction, took official Water Department actions to benefit the financial interests of Ignoffo, each of the Peters, and the representatives of eight other trucking companies, including awarding HTP projects and providing ongoing business opportunities in selecting, hiring, assigning and laying off firms for HTP projects. At the same time, the trucking firm defendants and other participating HTP representatives provided cash, campaign contributions, and other benefits to Tomczak and other parties associated with him, Wesolowski and McMahon both directly through Tomczak and indirectly through Wesolowski, McMahon and Barnes, acting essentially as his bagmen to influence and reward Tomczak in performing official acts relating to HTP services. During the 11-year span covered in the indictment, Tomczak and others allegedly obtained cash, campaign contributions and other things of value totaling more than $500,000, including: cash and gifts for the benefit of Tomczak, Wesolowski and McMahon substantially and regularly exceeding $50; and political contributions and other financial benefits provided by trucking company representatives at Tomczak s direction for the benefit of political campaigns with which he and other high-ranking government officials were associated, including Candidate A, Official B, Judicial Candidate C, Ward Organization D and Aldermanic Candidate E, among others. 4

The fraud scheme also alleges that Tomczak, through certain department employees including Wesolowski, Barnes and others, diverted and used city and department resources for the benefit of himself and certain political campaigns, including: awarding and promising the awarding of jobs and promotions in return for political work performed by department employees; conducting and coordinating political fund-raising solicitations of certain city and department vendors, including trucking companies, on behalf of certain political campaigns and organizations, including campaigns associated with Candidate A, Official B, Judicial Candidate C, Ward Organization D and Aldermanic Candidate E, among others; authorizing overtime to certain department employees as a reward for performing political work; and permitting city employees to conduct maintenance, repair and rent collection for apartment buildings owned by Tomczak, some of which was conducted on city time. Tomczak allegedly designated certain department employees, including Wesolowski and Barnes, as coordinators for political activity that he orchestrated on behalf of certain campaigns and candidates. Through his coordinators, Tomczak assembled more than 100 department employees for certain political events on behalf of candidates for various city, county, state and federal offices. Their activities included such voter outreach efforts as passing petitions, operating phone banks, dropping literature door-to-door and providing election day assistance. Tomczak and Wesolowski also allegedly obstructed justice in late September by tampering and attempting to tamper with a trucking company representative who was cooperating with the government. Between Sept. 27 and 29, aware that a federal grand jury was investigating the financial relationship between department trucking companies and city officials, Tomczak and Wesolowski allegedly directed and advised the cooperating witness to keep quiet, and federal investigators were not aware that the cooperating witness had provided envelopes to them. 5

The indictment also charges Commelie Peters with perjury for allegedly testifying falsely before a grand jury on Sept. 23, that she personally never gave cash or gifts of any kind to any city employees relating to the HTP, and no city employee ever asked for money for the employee s personal use (as opposed to solicitations for cash campaign contributions). In fact, Peters allegedly knew that on at least five occasions, she had provided periodic cash payments to Barnes with the understanding that the payments were for personal use of a city employee. She also understood that the payments permitted LR&C to keep and maintain HTP business opportunities in the department. She also allegedly knew that from the late 1990s through June 2003, Barnes came to the LR&C facility and picked up an envelope of cash, which she typically obtained from withdrawing funds from an LR&C business account. The government is being represented by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Patrick Collins, Patrick McGovern, Manish Shah, Barry Miller and Julie Ruder. If convicted, the charges in the indictment carry the following maximum penalties on each count: racketeering conspiracy 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine; mail fraud 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine; bribery 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine; obstruction of justice and perjury 5 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The Court, however, would determine the appropriate sentence to be imposed. The public is reminded that an indictment contains only charges and is not evidence of guilt. The defendants are presumed innocent and are entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. # # # # 6