I-77 Express Lanes Project Project Update. Rodger Rochelle October 2014

Similar documents
I-77 Managed Lanes Project Project Update. Ned Curran & Louis Mitchell September 2014

PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS What? Why? Who? How? Where? and Here. I-77 HOT Lanes P3 Project. Lake Norman Transportation Summit March 13, 2013

Preliminary Findings and Recommendations

Public Hearing Tarrant County. April 14, 2009

Managed Lanes: Transaction Strategies from the PPP Forefront

Fiscal Year 2014 Annual Report

Public Private Partnerships 101

Description of the Submission / Conditions Precedent

Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation. North Carolina Turnpike Authority Beau Memory March 14, 2017

Texas' LBJ Freeway Managed Lanes P3

NCDOT Public Private Partnerships P3 s Financing

National Conference of State Legislatures

47th Annual Workshop on Transportation Law

Finance Tools for Project Advancement

Ferrovial 1Q 2015 Investing for Growth

Overview of Highway Public-Private Partnerships (P3s)

AMENDED AND RESTATED COMPREHENSIVE AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE I-95/395 HOV/HOT LANES PROJECT DATED AS OF JUNE 8, 2017 BY AND BETWEEN

Introduction to Alternative Procurement Delivery

Ferrovial 1H 2015 Investing for Growth

Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation

I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan. October 2018 Public Meetings

P3 CONTRACTS. Morteza Farajian, Ph.D. November 2016

TOLLED MANAGED LANE POLICIES

Global Infrastructure

AVAILABILITY PAYMENTS What Can We Learn from Surface Transportation Projects? Pamela Bailey Campbell President, LeighFisher

The Federal Perspective: Project Finance, TIFIA and Public Private Partnerships

NOVEMBER 2013 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS

TEXAS METROPOLITAN MOBILITY PLAN: FUNDING NEW OPPORTUNITIES

-39 Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions Of electricity consumed by ferrovial came from renewable sources 100 in the case of Amey

THE OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS ( OTP3 )

SEPTEMBER 2018 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS

AMENDED AND RESTATED COMPREHENSIVE AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE ROUTE 495 HOT LANES IN VIRGINIA PROJECT DATED AS OF DECEMBER 19, 2007 BY AND AMONG

NORTH CAROLINA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY

REMARKETING CIRCULAR DATED JUNE 5, 2014

Ferrovial 9M 2015 Investing for Growth

Irvine Corona Expressway Project Financing Review

NCDOT Funding Overview

North Carolina Turnpike Authority Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee

Fredric W. Kessler, Esq.

Jan-Jun Tel:

I-66 RFI Response Vinci Concessions USA 25 November 2013

Transportation Primer

Florida Transportation Commission PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (P3)

MAJOR BUSINESS TERMS FOR THE TRANSFORM 66 P3 PROJECT IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DBFOM DELIVERY METHOD

Solutions: Accelerating Infrastructure Projects Goldman, Sachs & Co. April 22, 2008

Northern Virginia District State of the District. Helen L. Cuervo, P.E. District Engineer March 15, 2016

WidenI77.org. * P.O. Box 792 Cornelius, N.C

October 7, Introduction to the TIFIA Credit Program

SR 520 BRIDGE. Investment Grade Traffic and Revenue Study Update. SR 520 Bridge and the Eastside plus West Approach Bridge Project

COMPREHENSIVE AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE TRANSFORM 66 P3 PROJECT DATED AS OF [ ] BY AND BETWEEN

Jan-Mar Tel:

South Fraser Perimeter Road

Innovative But Familiar: Delivering Chisholm Trail Parkway

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Figure 1-1: SR 156 Study Area & Monterey Expressway Alignment

Aon Infrastructure Solutions

COMPREHENSIVE AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE TRANSFORM 66 P3 PROJECT DATED AS OF DECEMBER 8, 2016, BY AND BETWEEN

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE

Planning a Regional Express Lane Network Lessons from the Bay Area

Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA)

Public-Private Partnerships and Innovative Finance

Proposal for SH 121 Toll Project. Monday, May 7, 2007

INFRASTRUCTURE AND BUILDINGS

FUNDING CHANGES TO IH 635 EAST AND PROPOSITION 1 PROJECTS

Tampa Bay Express Planning Level Traffic and Revenue (T&R) Study

Summary of Changes for Tab 3

Fiscal Year nd Quarter Report Quarterly Report of Actual Traffic and Toll Revenue For period ending February 28, 2018

I-66 Express Mobility Partners LLC

95 Express Monthly Operations Report January 2018

Fiscal Year th Quarter Report Quarterly Report of Actual Traffic and Revenue For period ending August 31, 2017

ExpressLanes/HOT Lanes (I-110) DEIR/EA Project Overview March

DATA COLLECTION. March 15, 2013

2018 Budget Analysis. (Preliminary and Unaudited) Quarterly Financial Review

TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF TASK FORCE COMMITTEE ACTIVITY

A RESOLUTION. November 2009, for a total cost of $35.6 Million plus associated costs; and

PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS Rationale and Motivation. November 2015 Nicolas Rubio US President, Cintra

April 25, Martin Klepper Executive Director

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1049

SOUTHERN BELTWAY US-22 TO I-79 PROJECT 2013 FINANCIAL PLAN. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Allegheny and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania

Regional Toll Revenue Annual Financial Report

Appendix L Camino Real Regional Mobility Authority Tolling Policies and Road Use

95 Express Dynamic Pricing

North Carolina Department of Transportation Report to Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee

FY 2011 Continuing Appropriations Act. TIGER Discretionary Grant Program

NC Turnpike Authority Presentation to the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee. David Joyner November 4, 2011

DRAFT UTP November Update - Funding Adjustments Summary EXHIBIT A REVISION DATE 11/7/14. (Amounts in millions) Sum $0

JANUARY 2018 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS

UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

Honolulu High-Capacity Transit Corridor Project Alternatives Analysis

Experiences from a Finnish PPP project using project life-cycle management from the order perspective to maximise efficiency

91 Express Lanes Toll Policy Adopted July 14, 2003

Financial Submission

G r o u p o p e r a t i o n s. C u r r e n t m a r k e t s c e n a r i o

ATTACHMENT 2. Purpose. To provide guidance on proposed policy for High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes. Action

EXECUTION VERSION JULY 31, 2012 COMPREHENSIVE AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE I-95 HOV/HOT LANES PROJECT DATED AS OF JULY 31, 2012 BY AND BETWEEN

Audit Report. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, State Road and Tollway Authority. Fiscal Year A Component Unit of the State of Georgia

MARCH 2014 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS

NEWBERG-DUNDEE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. Milestone 1 Final Report Feasibility Assessment

Public Private Partnerships What they are, how they work, and what s being done

Fiscal Year th Quarter Report Quarterly Report of Actual Traffic and Toll Revenue For period ending August 31, 2018

Transcription:

I-77 Express Lanes Project Project Update Rodger Rochelle October 2014

Project Description In 2009, NCDOT conducted a Fast Lanes Study that analyzed 12 corridors in a 10 county region. The Charlotte City council identified the I-77 corridor in Charlotte-Mecklenburg as a candidate for High Occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes. The I-77 corridor is critical to the region as the only major North-South connection in the vicinity. The Project is critical for improving mobility and long term economic growth in the region; currently I-77 is one of the most congested corridors in the state. The Project scope addresses a comprehensive long-term congestion management solution for the corridor through the use of HOV3+ policy, HOT lanes and supports future expansion of transit. The Project implements Express lanes through a Public-Private Partnership (P3). Section HOT Lanes Section Limits South 2 2.5 miles on I-77 and 1.25 miles on I-277 with direct HOT lane connector to I-277 Central 2 15 miles from I-77/I-85 interchange to Exit 28 (Catawba Avenue) North 1 8 miles generally from Exit 28 to Exit 36 (NC 150) 2

Where are Managed Lanes being implemented? In Operation In Planning/ Design North Tarrant Express Dallas I-635 LBJ Dallas Loop 375 El Paso I-595 Express Fort Lauderdale

Key benefits of this P3 model Risk transfer Developer responsible for design, construction, financing, operation and maintenance (O&M) risks Developer is responsible for cost overruns during construction and operating phases Private sector accepts revenue risk Accelerate schedule and improve schedule certainty Performance-based technical requirements High level of customer service Whole-life cost optimization Private capital at risk and known/capped public investment Private sector expertise and innovation

Project Structure Users $ Financial Responsible Party Ferrovial Agromán, S.A. Tolling Authority ( NCTA) Tolling Contract $ Construction Contract NCDOT Contribution ($) $ NCDOT Project Agreement Developer I-77 Mobility Partners, LLC $ O&M Contract $ Debt Proceeds Debt Service Equity Dividends Cintra Infraestructuras, S.A. (100% Equity) Toll (Integration) Services Contract Debt PABS TIFIA DB Joint Venture (Lead Contractor) FA Southeast (70%) W.C. English (30%) O&M Contractor Cintra Infraestructuras, S.A. Toll System Integrator Cintra Toll Services, LLC 9

Summary of Commercial Terms Term Toll Concession Revenue Risk Exempt vehicles Dynamic Pricing All Electronic Tolling Standards Comment Construction + 50 years (operations) Assumed by Concessionaire HOV3+ CATS Buses Emergency Vehicles Trucks are excluded from the lanes To be used for Congestion Management To be Interoperable with NC Quick Pass & Eastern Transponders (E-ZPass, etc.) To be met or exceeded: OSPS - Average Speed of no less than 10 miles-per-hour under the posted speed limit on the HOT Lanes 90% of the time Federal standards per Title 23, United States Code (USC) Section 166: Average Speed of no less than 45 mph on the HOT Lanes 90% of the time 10

NCDOT Public Funds Contribution I-77 Mobility Partners Public Funds Amount (bid) was $88.2 million Notably below the amount ($170 million) anticipated by NCDOT Proposed infusion of public funds in latter stages of construction I-77 Mobility Partners assumes contingent $75 million Developer Revenue Adjustment Mechanism DRAM used to satisfy the rating agencies in the revenue downside case No DRAM draw in base case projections Fixed annual payment ($1 Million) for maintenance of corridor fence-to-fence Commensurate with current maintenance contract 11

I-77 Express Lanes Key Dates March 30, 2012: April 26, 2013: March 31, 2014: April 11, 2014: June 26, 2014: December, 2014: Late 2018: Four proposers shortlisted Initial indicative investment grade rating from Fitch Ratings Technical and financial proposal due date Cintra Infraestructuras, S.A. (I-77 Mobility Partners) selected as Apparent Best value Proposer Commercial Close (execution of contract) Financial Close (sale of bonds, secure equity) Express Lanes open 12

QUESTIONS???