Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Initiative

Similar documents
SIM Update. State Innovation Model

A Practical Discussion of Value and Quality Based Payments What Do I Do Now?

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. Senate Bill 934 CHAPTER... AN ACT

Gateway to Practitioner Excellence (GPE)

Adopting Multi-Payer and All- Payer Payment Models in States OCTOBER 25, 2016 WASHINGTON MARRIOTT WARDMAN PARK HOTEL WASHINGTON, DC

Stakeholder Innovation Group (SIG):

MACRA, MIPS, APMs & CPC+: What to Expect from All These Acronyms?! Monthly National Briefing April 26, 2016

Thank you, and enjoy the webinar.

Session 75 OF, Advantages & Challenges for Provider Led Health Plans. Moderator: LuCretia Leola Hydell, ASA, MAAA

ARRA Medicare and Medicaid Incentive Payments: How will Tribal Health Programs fit in?

Enhanced PCMH Payment Models and Mechanisms


MACRA Update: The Top 8 For Amy Mullins, MD, CPE, FAAFP Medical Director, Quality Improvement AAFP

Trekking Towards Value Based Payments

11/1/2016. Molina Healthcare of Michigan. Prior Authorizations. Third Party Payer Day Julie Hurst. Director, Provider Contracting and Services

9/23/2016. Our Services. Transitioning from Fee-for-Service to Value-based Reimbursement. Key Trends and Strategies for Rural Health Providers

North Carolina Medical Society 2015 Medicaid Reform Analysis Updated 07/15/15

Medicare s Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations Proposed Rule

C - Suite Transformation Management Training: Finance and Operations Overview. May 17, 2017

Value Based Contracting

PRACTICE TRANSFORMATION. Moving Towards A Future of Team Based Care. Michael A. Kolber, PhD, MD

Is Office Ally s EHR Certified for Meaningful Use?

Population-Based Healthcare: Structural Models and Options

General Guidance on Federally-facilitated Exchanges

CY 2018 Quality Payment Program Final Rule Summary

MACRA Final Rule Summary

No change from proposed rule. healthcare providers and suppliers of services (e.g.,

2018 Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Scoring Overview

The Future Of Medicare Physician Reimbursement

CIN FAQ. FREQUENTLY ASKED Questions about Clinically Integrated Networks from The Care Centered Collaborative

Oklahoma Health Care Authority

Comprehensive Primary Care Payment Calculator User s Guide

P r e p a r i n g f o r G l o b a l P a y m e n t : W h a t Yo u S h o u l d B e D o i n g N o w

MACRAnomics. Patient-Level Economics and Strategic Implications for Providers. Presented to: NW Ohio HFMA October 20, 2016

Approved Models to Align Incentives between Hospitals and their Physicians

2018 Quality Payment Program Final Rule. Summary

Cigna. Confirmed complaints: 5. Quality Overview. How Often Do Members Complain About This Company? Accreditation Exchange Product

Scripps Health ACO Update

AAOS MACRA Proposed Rule Summary (Short)

PRIMER: MACRA and the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Tara O Neill Hayes January 31, 2016

Alternative Payment Models and Clearinghouses Education and Impacts. White Paper by the Emerging Trends and Strategic Innovation Committee

Session 115IF, Provider Risk-Sharing Arrangements in Medicaid. Presenters: Puneet Budhiraja, ASA, MAAA Michael Minor Sudha Shenoy, FSA, MAAA, CERA

Total Cost of Care (TCOC) Workgroup. January 30, 2019

The Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier under the 2014 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. December 3, 2013

Implementing Statewide Measurement on Access, Cost and Quality in MN

GMCB Update Health Reform Oversight Committee. Chair Kevin Mullin and Michael Barber October 25, 2018

Medicaid FQHC APMs What are they and what do they mean for health centers? Alex Harris, MSPH Deputy Director, Transformation Policy

State of Georgia Department of Community Health

ACCESS PLAN COVER SHEET

The UNC Health Care System & BlueCross BlueShield of North Carolina Model Medical Practice: A Blueprint for Successful Collaboration

Get Straight on MACRA in 2018

Medicare Releases Final Rule for the Second Year of the Quality Payment Program

FUNDS FLOW METHODOLOGY FOR RISK-BASED CONTRACTS

A PRIMER FOR PRIMARY CARE

10/17/2014 Risk-Based Payment Methodologies A National Perspective Art Jones, MD. AccountableCareInstitute.com

Aetna s value based payment models aim to pay for value delivered, not services rendered

Health Care Policy Landscape: Market Trends & Frontline Perspectives

Bright Health Plan. Confirmed Complaints: N/A. Quality Overview. How Often Do Members Complain About This Company? Accreditation Exchange Product

New York State s Health Care Transformation: The Path to Medicaid Payment Reform through Value-Based Payment Programs

Expanding Maryland s APCD: the Role of the Health Insurance Exchange Establishment Funding

Figure 1: Original APM Framework

The Pharmacists Society of the State of New York

FINANCING AND PAYMENT ISSUES IN RURAL LONG TERM CARE INTEGRATION

Elevate by Denver Health Medical Plan

MACRA: Redefining How CMS Pays Doctors. White Paper ELLIS MAC KNIGHT, MD DAN KIEHL, JD CONTACT. Senior Vice President/CMO. Associate Consultant

THE $10,000 QUESTION: TACKLING THE COMPLEXITIES OF VALUE-BASED PHYSICIAN COMPENSATION

Growth and Success of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) in the US from Dennis Horrigan June 2016

Presentation to the IOM Committee on Core Metrics Tom Williams, Dr PH, President & CEO, IHA January 7, 2014, Irvine, California

All About APMs: What Will It Take for Physicians to Earn the APM Bonus Under MACRA?

MassHealth Section 1115 Waiver Summary. Key provisions:

Implications of Health Care Reform for Physician Compensation

Medicare Program; Advancing Care Coordination Through Episode Payment. Models (EPMs); Cardiac Rehabilitation Incentive Payment Model; and Changes to

Chapter 18 Section 14

Evaluating the Fair Market Value of Pay for Performance

Title I - Health Care Coverage

The Road to Value. Aric R. Sharp, MHA, CMPE, FACHE Vice President Accountable Care UnityPoint Health February 3, 2017

Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program Extension Planning and Protocols

Final Policy, Payment, and Quality Provisions in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for Calendar Year 2018

McKinney s Public Health Law 2999-n n. Accountable care organizations; findings; purpose. Effective: October 3, 2012

Q SPECIAL TOPIC REPORT: PROVIDER-OWNED HEALTH PLANS

Eight Indispensable Financial Considerations of Shifting from Volume to Value Reimbursement

Value-Based Payment Study

Providers Contracting Directly With Employers

MANAGED CARE READINESS TOOLKIT

Clinical Integration:

Rocky Mountain Health Plans PPO

In accordance with Act 124 of 2018 (H.914)

CMS PROPOSES KEY PROVISIONS OF MACRA PHYSICIAN PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR 2019

Sutter Medical Network

Predictive Qualifying Alternative Payment Model (APM) Participants (QPs) Methodology Fact Sheet What is the Predictive QP Status Analysis?

Elevate by Denver Health Medical Plan

The National Payment Reform Summit Preparing for New Payment Models A Community Perspective

June 18, RE: Comments on General Guidance on Federally Facilitated Exchanges. Dear Mr. Larsen:

evaluating the fair market value of pay for performance

MACRA: New Medicare Reimbursement Models Sharp HealthCare

CMS Quality Payment Program

Rocky Mountain Health Plans

REPORT OF THE COUNCIL ON MEDICAL SERVICE

CNYCC Joint Board and Finance Committee Forum

Strategic Plan Scorecard Measuring Success

Transcription:

Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Initiative A Michigan Primary Care Transformation (MiPCT) Partnership with the State Innovation Model h e a l t h i e r a n d m o r e p r o d u c t i v e l i v e s, n o m a t t e r t h e i r s t a g e i n l i f e.

Highlights PCMH Initiative Intent to Participate (ITP) process opened last week Responses are due by June 30 th All current MiPCT practices are strongly encouraged to complete the ITP The ITP is very streamlined for current MiPCT practices, it should only take a couple minutes to submit Implementation efforts for the January 1, 2017 launch of the PCMH Initiative are well underway Conversations regarding continued commercial payer participation with BCBSM and Priority have been positive Interim payment model for 2017 has taken shape MDHHS will not be applying (for Medicaid as a participating payer) in the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus program Your feedback strongly supported the custom option approach Numerous disadvantages for MDHHS CPC+ participation solidified your feedback MDHHS is diligently working toward a custom participation option to engagement Medicare in Michigan s PCMH efforts going forward Significant stakeholder engagement opportunities will be coming up in July h e a l t h i e r a n d m o r e p r o d u c t i v e l i v e s, n o m a t t e r t h e i r s t a g e i n l i f e. 2

Performance-Driven Payment Initiative Year 1 Initiative Year 2 Initiative Year 3 Medicaid Initial payment model implementation Payment model alignment (to the greatest extent possible) with custom Medicare approach Payment model refinement and growth Medicare Interim chronic and transitional care management payments Custom approach payment model implementation Commercial Sustaining current commercial payer participation Commercial payer participation growth Please note that timelines are approximate. h e a l t h i e r a n d m o r e p r o d u c t i v e l i v e s, n o m a t t e r t h e i r s t a g e i n l i f e. 3

Performance-Driven Payment Initiative Year One Medicaid: Practice Transformation and Care Management PMPM Payments Medicare: Chronic Care Management and Transitional Care Management Payments Commercial: Payment aligned with the goals of the Initiative, with some anticipated payment structure variation across payers Initiative Year Two and Beyond Aligned (to the extent possible) payment model for both Medicaid and Medicare, commercial payment structure may still vary across payers Alignment payment model structural focus: Based on quality measures that are evidence-based, reliable, and valid Reasonable financial accountability for total cost of care More advanced EHR/HIT requirements Demonstration of tangible practice improvement The aligned payment model will be developed and finalized with significant stakeholder involvement h e a l t h i e r a n d m o r e p r o d u c t i v e l i v e s, n o m a t t e r t h e i r s t a g e i n l i f e. 4

Strategy Component Key Implementation Steps Achieving Statewide Scale SIM year one regions selected and defined, including clarity for the Northern Region Partnership, practice capability and budgetary analysis process to begin midway through the first implementation year to define expansion approach Inclusive Accreditation Approach PCMH Operations Contractor capacity to track and verify PCMH accreditation status across all participating practices in place Approach recognizing all prominent and/or requested PCMH programs finalized, including NCQA, AAAHC, TJC, URAC, BCBSM/PGIP Broad Attributed Population Significant investment in HIE underway to advance attribution methodology Participation Requirements Intent to Participate process launched through June 30 th to determine potential year one scale and current practice capabilities Full application, selection process and participation agreement to follow in September Advanced Care Management Preliminary agreement regarding changes to care management requirements in place Formalization of collaboration approach between Medicaid plans and current MiPCT care managers anticipated Performance-Driven Payment Preliminary Medicaid payment model design in place for Medicaid health plan feedback and implementation Additions through the health plan rate development process planned for this summer Decision-making regarding Medicare engagement complete, custom Medicare option design and proposal development starting now Consistent Metrics Adoption of metrics for care quality, coordination and satisfaction well underway Sustainable Financing Blending support from the SIM cooperative agreement and PMPM admin fees is budgeted and built into Initiative revenue/expense expectations on an ongoing basis PCMH Support and Learning Specialized support for participating providers through PCMH Operations Contractor and sub-contracts made part of their capacity New agreement with IHI reached for collaborative learning facilitation h e a l t h i e r a n d m o r e p r o d u c t i v e l i v e s, n o m a t t e r t h e i r s t a g e i n l i f e. 5

Accreditation Approach The PCMH initiative will take an inclusive approach to PCMH accreditation (also called recognition and/or certification) by recognizing existing PCMH accreditation programs rather than developing a unique accreditation requirement or program Accrediting body programs considered acceptable for participation include, but are not limited to, BCBSM/PGIP, NCQA, AAAHC, TJC, URAC Some accrediting programs may have non-mandatory components that the Initiative determines are required for participation Practices wishing to participate in the Initiative will be required to possess PCMH accreditation from one of the approved programs h e a l t h i e r a n d m o r e p r o d u c t i v e l i v e s, n o m a t t e r t h e i r s t a g e i n l i f e. 6

Eligible Providers Provider types eligible to participate in the PCMH Initiative will include: Family Physicians General Practitioners Pediatricians Geriatricians Internal Medicine Physicians Obstetricians Gynecologists Advanced Practice Registered Nurses Physician Assistants Safety Net Providers (e.g. federally qualified health centers, rural health clinics, child and adolescent health centers, local public health departments, and Indian health services) h e a l t h i e r a n d m o r e p r o d u c t i v e l i v e s, n o m a t t e r t h e i r s t a g e i n l i f e. 7

Participation Requirements The following practice characteristics and capabilities will be required for PCMH participation in the Initiative on January 1, 2017. (These characteristics and capabilities do not need to be in place to complete the Intent to Participate process, but will be required in the participation agreement prior to participation.) PCMH accreditation from an Initiative approved recognizing body Implementation of an ONC certified Electronic Health Record (EHR) Advanced patient access 24/7 access to clinician decision maker Same-day scheduling availability for at least 30% of appointments Access to a provider other than the Emergency Department for at least 8 non-standard business hours per week A relationship with specialty and behavioral health providers in addition to one or more hospitals which accept patient referrals and cooperate with PCMH activities Enrollment as a Michigan Medicaid provider in compliance with all provider policies Embedded care management / coordination staff meeting standards set by the Initiative A patient registry or EHR registry functionality h e a l t h i e r a n d m o r e p r o d u c t i v e l i v e s, n o m a t t e r t h e i r s t a g e i n l i f e. 8

Participation Requirements The following practice characteristics and capabilities will be required for PCMH participation in the Initiative, but the requirements will be phased in during the first year of participation (i.e. not required on January 1, 2017): Connection to a Health Information Exchange (HIE) Qualified Organization (QO), also known as sub-state HIEs Participation in MiHIN use cases applicable to the Initiative (e.g. HPD, ACRS, ADT, SCD) Stage 1 / modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use achievement h e a l t h i e r a n d m o r e p r o d u c t i v e l i v e s, n o m a t t e r t h e i r s t a g e i n l i f e. 9

Consistent Metrics PCMH practice transformation performance will be measured on whether or not a PCMH is making progress toward and ultimately meets its identified practice transformation objective(s) Performance will be based upon streamlined self-reporting by participating PCMHs A small number of metrics reflecting the process and/or outcome of care coordination will be used to assess PCMH care coordination performance Number/percentage of attributed patient population receiving care coordination services Timely follow-up after discharge The Initiative will monitor performance on 19 quality metrics and 4 utilization metrics on a consistent basis during the first year Quality metrics were adopted from the Physician Payer Quality Collaborative core measure set, which was developed using practice and physician organization feedback h e a l t h i e r a n d m o r e p r o d u c t i v e l i v e s, n o m a t t e r t h e i r s t a g e i n l i f e. 10

PCMH Support, Learning and Engagement All PCMHs participating in the Initiative will complete a standardized self-assessment process on an annual basis to measure PCMH implementation maturity over time and guide support activities PCMHs participating in the Initiative will be invited to join peer practices in a set of Initiative-sponsored collaborative learning activities The PCMH Initiative will also work to generate multi-stakeholder (payers, provider associations, continuing education providers etc.) collaboration surrounding the types of practice support provided to stimulate alignment The PCMH Initiative will be directed by the SIM governance structure in addition to a SIM advisory commission The PCMH Initiative will maintain a strong working group and advisory process as a compliment to SIM s overall governance structure to ensure stakeholders are consistently engaged and guidance is acted upon h e a l t h i e r a n d m o r e p r o d u c t i v e l i v e s, n o m a t t e r t h e i r s t a g e i n l i f e. 11