Basel - III, Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended

Head Office: Manipal 576104, Corporate Office: Gandhinagar, Bangalore 56009, Karnataka Basel - III, Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended 30.06.2017 Table DF-2: Capital Adequacy i. Qualitative Disclosures Assessment of capital: The Bank has a process for assessing its overall capital adequacy in relation to the Bank's risk profile and a strategy for maintaining its capital levels. The process provides an assurance that the Bank has adequate capital to support all risks inherent to its present business and to support the planned business growth and an appropriate capital buffer based on its business profile. The Bank identifies, assesses and manages comprehensively all risks that it is exposed to, through sound governance and control practices, robust risk management framework and an elaborate process for capital calculation and planning. Bank has, Board approved comprehensive Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and Stress test policy which was adopted since 2008. Bank has been modifying/revising the ICAAP policy on an annual basis based on the experience gained, sophistication achieved and also as per the suggestions/observations made by RBI during its AFI/Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process. The last such revision was done on 05.08.2017. The Bank has a structured management framework in the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process for the identification and evaluation of the significance of all risks that the Bank faces, which may have an adverse material impact on its financial position. The Bank considers the following as material risks; it is exposed to, in the normal course of its business and therefore, factors these in ICAAP (a) Credit Risk (b) Credit Concentration Risk Name concentration Group Concentration Sector concentration Zone concentration Asset Type concentration External & Internal rating grade concentration (c) Market Risk (not covered under Pillar I) (d) Operational Risk (not covered under Pillar I) (e) Liquidity Risk (f) Interest Rate Risk in Banking Book Other Risks covered as part of Pillar 2, in ICAAP: - In addition to the above mentioned risks, Bank also assesses the following risks as part of Pillar 2 in qualitative manner. (a) Reputational Risk (b) Strategic Risk (c) Group Risk (d) Settlement Risk

(e) Pension Obligation Risk (f) Loss of Key Personnel (g) Model Risk The Bank has implemented a Board approved Stress Testing Framework taking into consideration RBI guidelines which forms an integral part of the Bank's ICAAP and provides an assessment of the capital requirement and impact on Profits of the Bank under stressed conditions envisaged by the Bank. The purpose of stress testing is to assess the impact of various shocks on the quality of the bank s portfolio and an assessment of the bank s ability to withstand such shocks if such an event/s materializes. When such events actually take place, the quality of assets held by a bank will deteriorate and may lead to reduced profits or constrain the bank to keep more capital. In order to assess the impact on CRAR and income of the bank, the Stress Test will be conducted on quarterly basis. The Bank assesses the impact on the following risks, as part of Stress Test: (a) Credit Risk Non-performing assets Restructured assets Collateral Concentration Risk (b) Market Risk Foreign Exchange Risk Interest rate Risk - Trading Book - Banking Book Equity Price Risk (c) Liquidity Risk The two broad categories of stress tests used are sensitivity tests and scenario analysis. ii. Quantitative Disclosures: a) Capital requirement for Credit Risk: Particulars Amount (` in Millions) Portfolios subject to Standardised Approach 148,271.24 Securitisation exposures* - Total 148,271.24 * Bank does not have any exposure to securitisation transactions Page 2 of 15

b) Capital requirements for Market risk: Standardized Duration Approach Amount (` in Millions) Interest rate risk 11,063.85 Foreign exchange risk(including gold) 138.38 Equity risk 3,414.92 Total 14,617.14 c) Capital requirements for Operational risk: Amount ` in Particulars Millions Basic indicator approach 16,389.42 d) Common Equity Tier1, Tier1 and Total Capital ratios: iii. Risk Exposure and Assessment Credit Risk Particulars % Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio 7.45% Tier 1 Ratio 9.24% Total Capital Ratio 12.03% a) Definition: Credit Risk is defined as the possibility of losses associated with diminution in the credit quality of counterparties. In a Bank s portfolio, losses stem from outright default due to inability or unwillingness of a customer or counterparty to meet commitments in relation to lending, trading, settlement and other financial transactions. Alternatively, losses result from reduction in portfolio value arising from actual or perceived deterioration in credit quality of the assets. b) Credit Risk Strategy: One of the key components of credit risk management framework is credit risk strategy. Bank has sound credit risk strategy to meet the objectives of credit risk management. Bank's Credit Risk Strategy is in consonance with credit philosophy of the Bank, which emphasizes quality assets, profitable relationships and prudent growth. Accordingly, Bank's Credit Risk Strategy is guided by the following principles: Credit granting process of the Bank would be marked by careful assessment in selecting borrowers and prudence in approving loans. Credit quality shall not be compromised for the sake of earnings or volumes. The business development would aim to diffuse credit risks through broadening of the client base, sectoral diversification and geographical distribution. Credit Risk strategy of the Bank would also seek to mitigate the cyclical economic trends and ensure that, the shifts in the composition of credit do not have an adverse effect on overall quality of the credit portfolio. Bank employs the following processes to accomplish its credit risk strategies. Establishment of pro-active risk management practices Separation of credit risk management functions from credit sanction Page 3 of 15

Risk based appraisal and sanction Multi-tiered credit approval system Discriminatory sanction levels based on amount, transaction risks and rating Independent loan review mechanism Focused attention on problem/ weak credit exposures Review / exit in case of low quality assets. Risk driven management of credit ceilings or limits Capture, Analysis and Measurement of Credit Risk Risk based pricing Focused approach to specialized lending. This is being done through establishment of Large / Mid-corporate branches, Centralized Processing Centre for Housing Loan. Identify Low Priority Industries based on the current exposure and NPA levels Thus the strategy would determine the Bank s willingness to grant loans based on the type of economic activity, geographical location, currency, market, maturity and anticipated profitability. This would necessarily translate into the identification of target markets and business sectors, preferred levels of diversification and concentration, cost of capital in granting credit and cost of bad debts. Credit Risk Management System The credit risk management system encompasses the following: i. Identification of Risk: Bank has methods and procedures to identify or locate the credit risk. Timely identification of risk will enable the Bank to initiate timely corrective action. ii. iii. iv. Assessment of Risk: Assessment is done by rating the borrower and classifying the borrower under a particular risk grade. Each risk grade indicates the relative riskiness of the borrower vis-à-vis others in the portfolio. Risk assessment is quantified for the purpose of grading and comparison. Monitoring of Risk: Once the risk is identified and assessed, Bank continuously monitors and ensure that the risk remains within manageable limits. Risk monitoring is an important tool of the Bank to protect the quality of the asset and avoid slippage to NPA. Control and Mitigation of Risk: Controlling of risk is ensured by the Continuous monitoring undertaken in respect of Special Mention Accounts by the bank under a separate vertical called Credit Monitoring and Review department showing signs of slippage in asset quality and monitoring of exposure to sensitive sectors are undertaken on a monthly basis. Efforts are made to mitigate the risk. Risk is mitigated by way of obtaining collaterals or guarantees. c) Credit Risk Governance: The Bank has an independent Risk Management Department, which is headed by General Manager and is responsible for managing credit risk, market risk, operational risk and integration of all risks. The department functions independent of Credit Department and other operations and decision making processes. The Risk Management Department focuses on identification, assessment, monitoring and controlling and mitigating of risks across various segments. i) Organisation Structure: Page 4 of 15

The Bank has implemented a robust and comprehensive Credit Risk Management framework. The Board of Directors assumes the overall responsibility for credit risk management and decides the credit risk management policy, strategies and sets prudential & other limits. The set-up of Risk Management Department is hereunder: Board of Directors Risk Management Committee CRMC (Credit Risk Management Committee) ORMC (Operational Risk Management Committee) ALCO (Asset Liability Management Committee) ISMC (Information Security Management Committee) Risk Management Department RMC at ROs ISWG (Information Security Working Group) CISO (Chief Information Security Officer) Credit Risk Credit Policy Formula tion Operation al Risk Market Risk & Liquidity Risk BASEL II/III Impleme ntation SOC (Security Operations Centre) CIS (Centre for Information Security) 1. Risk Management Committee (RMC) of the Board: The Risk Management Committee, a sub-committee of the Board headed by Managing Director & CEO, devises the policy and strategies for integrated risk management containing various risk exposures of the Bank, including the credit risk. The responsibilities of RMC include: a) Setting risk strategies, risk policies, risk appetite and risk tolerance of the Bank. Page 5 of 15

b) Setting policies and guidelines for measurement/ management/ monitoring/reporting of Credit Risk, Market Risk and Operational Risk. Approving all related policies i.e., Credit policy, Credit Risk Policy, Forex Treasury Policy and Operational guidelines, Domestic Treasury Policy and Operational Guidelines, ALM policy, Operational risk policy, etc. c) Approving procedures for analysing, measuring and monitoring various risks, which should be sufficiently comprehensive to capture all material risk inherent in the Bank s business. d) Setting up efficient internal control system to promote effective operations, reliable reporting, safeguarding assets and ensuring compliance with risk limits, laws, regulations and approved policies. e) Approving and Reviewing risk limits under credit risks, market risks and operational risks f) Undertaking on an ongoing basis an assessment of credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, interest rate risk, equity price risk, foreign exchange risk, operational risk, legal risk, etc. g) Ensuring robustness of financial models and effectiveness of all systems used to calculate Credit/Market/Operational risks. h) Monitoring compliance with risk parameters by various operating departments and ensure the appropriateness of risk control process, keeping in view the level of risks posed by the bank s activities. i) Paying prompt attention to identify material weaknesses and take remedial action. j) Ensuring that risk management processes (related to people, systems, operations, limits and controls) satisfy Bank s policy. k) Co-ordinate and supervise Credit Risk Management Committee (CRMC), Asset- Liability Management Committee (ALCO) and Operational Risk Management Committee (ORMC) through review of minutes of these committees. l) Report to the Board of Directors by placing the minutes of RMC meetings. m) Place any note to the Board for approval / discussion depending upon the importance of the matter. Separate sub-committees, are set up to manage and control various risks: Credit Risk Management Committee (CRMC) Operational Risk Management Committee (ORMC) Asset Liability Management Committee (ALCO) 2. Credit Risk Management Committee (CRMC): The Credit Risk Management Committee (CRMC) chaired by Managing Director & CEO, is responsible for the implementation of the Credit Risk Policy and strategies approved by the Board. The committee monitors credit risk, clears policies and ensures compliance of policies. 3. Risk Management Cells at ROs: The Risk Management Cell at RO is responsible for overall credit and operational risk management functions including Basel II related work. The functions of Risk Management cell include review of reporting register, review of sanctions, confirmation of ratings, Basel II implementation, operational risk management, review of concurrent audit reports, monitoring of SM accounts, Mitra committee reports, monitoring issuance of Legal Compliance and Due Diligence certificate. Page 6 of 15

The scope and Nature of Credit Risk reporting and/ or measurement system 1) The credit risk of a borrower or that of a credit facility sanctioned to a borrower is assessed through a credit rating system. The rating of the borrower is done prior to sanction of the loan and review of the rating is to be done on regular basis. The confirmation of the rating is independent of sanction. Hurdle rates are prescribed by the Board for considering or rejecting a proposal for various portfolios. Credit Rating is also linked to decide Sanctioning Authority, Margin, Pricing and monitoring purposes. 2) Portfolio credit risk is assessed by studying the exposures under the following categories and appraised to Top Management, Risk Management Committee of the Board, Audit Committee of the Board and Board of Directors on a regular basis. Prudential limits for individual and group borrowers Ceiling on maximum credit that can be considered for an individual borrower / group of borrowers Exposure ceiling for Top 20 Group and Top 20 Individual Borrowers Industry-wise/sector-wise exposure ceilings Exposure to Sensitive Sector Exposure to Capital Market Rating-wise distribution of all the advances Migration of ratings Movement of credit ratings in the credit portfolio as a whole over different time periods 3) Bank is having Loan Review Mechanism (LRM), which involves independent assessment of the quality of an advance, effectiveness of loan administration, compliance with internal policies of bank and regulatory framework and portfolio quality. It also helps in tracking weaknesses developing in the account for initiating corrective measures in time. Policies for hedging and/or mitigating risk and strategies and processes for monitoring the continuing effectiveness of hedges/mitigants: Bank has evolved several strategies/systems/procedures to mitigate and monitor credit risk. The operational guidelines pertaining to the Risk Monitoring and control systems put in place by the bank are as under. The Bank has an independent Credit Monitoring & Review Department for identifying all problem accounts which places the same before Top Management and coordinates with functional departments at CO/HO, for effective monitoring of Special Mention accounts/restructured accounts and takes feedback for any changes in the system/policy. Timely remedial action is taken to improve the quality of the assets and arrest slippage to NPA category. Similar structure exists in each RO. Bank is having the system of Monthly Monitoring Report for borrowal accounts with balance outstanding of ` 1 crore and above for monitoring and follow up of advances and preventing from slipping to NPA. Bank has also system of conducting periodic credit audits and stock audit for exposure beyond a threshold limit. Security management is instrumental in mitigating credit risk. It involves creation of enforceable charge over the borrower/third party assets in favour of the Bank, proper valuation/storage/maintenance and insurance of the securities so charged at regular intervals, in order that the Bank s advances/loans remain fully covered by the realizable Page 7 of 15

value of the securities charged to it. Further, the charged securities are valued at periodic intervals and stipulated margins are maintained at all times. Table DF-3: Credit Risk: General Disclosures i. Qualitative Disclosures A sound and efficient banking system is a sine qua non for maintaining financial stability. Loans and advances constitute major portion of the assets of the Bank and also a vital source of income. Asset quality is one of the major soundness indicators of a bank. Therefore considerable emphasis has been placed on improving asset quality. Prompt recovery of loans and advances not only increases the liquidity and profitability position of the Bank, but also enables the Bank to recycle the funds for alternate productive activities and to improve the bottom line. The Bank classifies its advances (loans and credit substitutes in the nature of an advance) into performing and non-performing loans in accordance with the extant RBI guidelines on Asset classification, Income Recognition and Provisioning to Advances portfolio. An NPA is defined as a loan or an advance where: An asset, including a leased asset, becomes non-performing when it ceases to generate Income for the bank. A non performing asset (NPA) is a loan or an advance where; Interest and / or installment of principal remains overdue for a period of more than 90 days in respect of a term loan, The account remains 'out of order', in respect of an Overdraft / Cash Credit (OD/ CC), The bill remains overdue for a period of more than 90 days in the case of bills purchased and discounted, The installment of principal or interest thereon remains overdue for two crop seasons for short duration crops, The installment of principal or interest thereon remains overdue for one crop season for long duration crops, The amount of liquidity facility remains outstanding for more than 90 days, in respect of a securitization transaction undertaken in terms of RBI guidelines on Securitization dated February 1, 2006. in respect of derivative transactions, the overdue receivables representing positive mark-to-market value of a derivative contract, if remain unpaid for a period of 90 days from the specified due date for payment. A Credit card account will be treated as non-performing asset if the minimum amount due, as mentioned in the statement is not paid fully within 90 days from the payment due date mentioned in the statement. In case of interest payments, the account shall be classified as NPA only if the interest due and charged during any quarter is not serviced fully within 90 days from the end of the quarter. Out of Order status: An account should be treated as 'out of order' if the outstanding balance remains continuously in excess of the sanctioned limit / drawing power for 90 days. In case where the outstanding balance in the principal operating account is less than the Page 8 of 15

sanctioned limit / drawing power, but there are no credits continuously for 90 days as on the date of Balance Sheet or credits are not enough to cover the interest debited during the same period, these accounts also should be treated as 'out of order'. Overdue: Any amount due to the bank under any credit facility is 'overdue' if it is not paid on the due date fixed by the bank. Quantitative Disclosures: Total Gross Credit Risk Exposures Gross Outstanding Advances (Fund Based and Non - Fund Based) Geographical Distribution-Wise: Category As on June 30, 2017 Fund Based Non fund Based Total Domestic 16,34,332.14 2,37,058.29 18,71,390.43 Overseas 3,93,022.53 0.67 3,93,023.20 Total 20,27,354.67 2,37,058.96 22,64,413.63 Industry-Wise Distribution of Exposures (Gross Fund Based and Non-Fund Based Advances) Industries Fund Based Non Fund Based Total Agriculture 355,671.60 0 355,671.60 Mining & Quarrying (incl. Coal) 7,279.20 1,912.71 9,191.91 Food Processing 32,770.03 2,539.39 35,309.42 Sugar 6,558.96 34.64 6,593.60 Edible Oils & Vanaspati 5,084.42 1,001.10 6,085.52 Tea 413.33 2.1 415.43 Others 20,713.32 1,501.55 22,214.87 Beverage & Tobacco 1,492.96 171.78 1,664.74 Textiles 27,630.40 1,462.82 29,093.22 Cotton Textiles 10,225.53 697.06 10,922.59 Jute Textiles 110.11 19.01 129.12 Man-Made Textiles 1,346.84 0.17 1,347.01 Other Textiles 15,947.92 746.58 16,694.50 Leather & Leather Products 1,270.67 41.88 1,312.55 Wood & Wood Products 1,907.20 617.55 2,524.75 Paper & Paper Products 8,652.47 933.7 9,586.17 Petroleum, Coal Products & Nuclear Fuels 24,248.07 33,051.05 57,299.12 Of which: Petroleum 18,667.05 33,042.82 51,709.87 Chemicals & Chemical Products 28,526.13 6,915.28 35,441.41 Fertilizer 3,588.84 5,081.87 8,670.71 Drugs & Pharmaceuticals 9,208.74 306.26 9,515.00 Page 9 of 15

Industries Fund Based Non Fund Based Total Petro Chemicals 12,158.45 532.4 12,690.85 Others 3,570.10 994.75 4,564.85 Rubber, Plastic & their Products 8,473.28 1,014.81 9,488.09 Glass & Glassware 2,127.71 160.46 2,288.17 Cement & Cement Products 8,281.91 1,499.81 9,781.72 Basic Metal & Metal Product 94,218.70 3,847.95 98,066.65 Iron & Steel 85,088.14 3,506.42 88,594.56 Other Metal & Metal Product 9,130.56 341.53 9,472.09 All Engineering 20,643.23 46,759.85 67,403.08 Electronics 2,363.19 4,417.23 6,780.42 Others 18,280.04 42,342.62 60,622.66 Vehicles, Vehicle Parts & Transport Equipment 10,050.77 729.82 10,780.59 Gems & Jewellery 17,688.86 1,404.04 19,092.90 Construction (other than Infrastructure) 28,681.42 32,996.48 61,677.90 Infrastructure 245,392.94 40,926.07 286,319.01 Power 132,420.95 8,571.58 140,992.53 Of which: State-owned Power Utilities 71,151.25 682.76 71,834.01 Telecommunication 23,158.41 25,175.06 48,333.47 Roads 24,782.47 4,435.77 29,218.24 Airports 0 0 0 Ports 3,132.47 0 3,132.47 Railways (other than Indian Railways) 11,641.25 30.6 11,671.85 Other Infrastructure 50,257.39 2,713.06 52,970.45 Other Industries (Excluding NBFC) 40,975.59 7,187.82 48,163.41 NBFC 186,561.90 275.00 186,836.90 Total of Industries (Including NBFC) 1,152,545.04 1,84,448.27 1,336,993.31 Residual Advances 874,809.63 52,610.69 927,420.32 Total Advances 2,027,354.67 2,37,058.96 2,264,413.63 Exposure to Industries in excess of 5% of total exposure: % of Industries Fund Based Non Fund Based Total Total Exposur e Agriculture 355,671.60 0 355,671.60 15.71% Infrastructure 245,392.94 40,926.07 286,319.01 12.64% of which Power 71,151.25 682.76 71,834.01 6.23% NBFC 186,561.90 275.00 186,836.90 8.25% Page 10 of 15

Maturity Buckets Syndicate Bank Basel III Disclosures for the Quarter ended 30.06.2017 Residual contractual maturity breakdown of assets as on 30.06.2017: Cash Bal. with RBI Bal. with other banks Investments Net Advances Fixed Assets Other Assets Next Day 13,533 1,938 1,987 127,022 60,379-667 205,525 2-7 days - 1,928 31,083 967 49,258-172,720 255,955 8-14 days - 888-1,200 20,085-57,165 79,338 15 to 30 days - 1,378-1,725 31,096-821 35,020 31 days & upto 2 m - 3,315-5,925 67,300-2,187 78,726 > 2 m & upto 3 m - 5,880-8,658 68,045-3,662 86,246 > 3 m and upto 6 m - 13,912-2,911 165,835-6,619 189,276 > 6 m and upto 1 y - 29,928 9,404 18,477 190,077-8,679 256,565 > 1 y and upto 3 y - 36,463 1,593 148,953 607,116-34,387 828,513 > 3 y and upto 5 y - 3,566 26,701 95,301 278,587-2,592 406,747 > 5 y and upto 7 y - 224-127,178 119,278-4,824 251,504 > 7 y and upto 10 y - 216-54,080 107,072-3,175 164,543 > 10 y and upto 15 y - 153-36,136 73,071-1,850 111,209 > 15 years - 80 1,205 36,838 108,163 24,318 1,714 172,318 Total 13,533 99,868 71,973 665,370 1,945,361 24,318 301,062 3,121,486 Amount of NPAs (Gross) Category of Assets Amount (` in Millions) Substandard 63,242.70 Doubtful 1 63,559.90 Doubtful 2 61,562.80 Doubtful 3 11,986.80 Loss 1,486.30 Total NPA 201,838.50 Net NPAs 121,883.00 NPA Ratios (i) Gross NPAs to Gross Advances 9.96 (ii) Net NPAs to Net advances 6.27 Total Page 11 of 15

Movement in NPA Particulars Amount (` in Millions) NPA (Opening balance 31.03.2017) 176,093.10 Increase in NPA Fresh NPA 35,051.40 Increase due operations 2,577.50 Increase due to Diff in FX exchange 687.90 Any other (Pl specify) 0.00 Total (A) 38,316.80 Reduction in NPAs Recovery towards Principal 3,776.90 Write off 191.00 PWO 5,910.60 Up gradation 2,022.40 Decrease due to operations 0.00 Decrease due FX Exchange 670.50 Any other (Pl specify) 0.00 Total (B) 12,571.40 NPA (Closing balance 30.06.2017) 201,838.50 Movement of Provisions for NPAs Particulars Opening balance (31.03.2017) 70,497.40 Add : Provisions made during the period 13,869.00 Less : Write Off 5,910.60 Write back of excess provisions 0.10 Closing Balance (30.06.2017) 78,455.70 Non-Performing Investments Particulars Amount of Non-Performing Investments 4,402.24 - Amount of provisions held for non-performing investments 3,531.60 - Amount of provisions for Depreciation on investments 2,739.01 Total: Provision for non-performing investments & Depreciation on investments 6,270.61 Page 12 of 15

Provision movement of Non-Performing Investments & Depreciation on Investments (Valuation) Particulars Opening balance (31.03.2017) 6,147.82 Provisions made during the period 318.51 Write Off / Reduction in Provisions 195.72 Write back of excess Provisions 0.00 Closing Balance (30.06.2017) 6,270.61 Table DF - 4 - Credit Risk: Disclosures for Portfolios Subject to the Standardised Approach i. Qualitative Disclosures: 1. Names of the credit Rating Agencies used, plus reasons for any changes :- In line with the provisions of the Revised Framework under Basel II, where the facility provided by the Bank possesses rating assigned by an eligible credit rating agency, the risk weight of the claim will be based on this rating. Bank uses the ratings of the following domestic credit rating agencies for the purposes of risk weighting their claims for capital adequacy purposes: Credit Rating Information Services of India Limited (CRISIL) Credit Analysis and Research Limited (CARE) India Ratings and Research Private Limited (India Ratings) Investment Information and Credit Rating Agency of India (ICRA) Brickwork Ratings India Pvt. Limited (Brickwork) SMERA Ratings Ltd. Infomerics Valuation and Rating Pvt. Ltd. Bank use, the ratings of the following international credit rating agencies for the purposes of risk weighting their claims for capital adequacy purposes: Fitch Moody's Standard & Poor s 2. Types of exposures for which ratings are used:- The Bank has used the solicited ratings assigned by the above approved credit rating agencies for all eligible exposures, both on balance sheet and off balance sheet, whether short term or long term. The Bank has not made any discrimination among ratings assigned by these agencies nor has restricted their usage to any particular type of exposure. If there are two ratings accorded by credit rating agencies that map into different risk weights, the higher risk weight corresponding to lowest rating applied. If multiple ratings accorded by credit rating agencies with different ratings, then the ratings corresponding to the two lowest risk weights referred to and the higher of those two risk weights applied. i.e., the second lowest risk weight. 3. Description of the process used to transfer public issue ratings on to comparable assets in the banking book. Page 13 of 15

Bank invests in a particular issue that has an issue specific rating by a chosen credit rating agency; the risk weight of the claim will be based on this assessment. Issue Specific Ratings (Bank s own exposures or other issuance of debt by the same borrower constituent/counterparty) or Issuer Ratings (borrower constituent/ counterparty) are applied to unrated exposures of the same borrower constituent/ counterparty subject to the following: Issue specific ratings are used where the unrated claim of the Bank ranks pari-passu or senior to the rated issue / debt. Wherever issuer rating or issue specific ratings are used to risk weight unrated claims, such ratings are extended to entire amount of claim on the same counterparty. Ratings used for risk weighting purposes are confirmed from the websites of the rating agencies concerned. ii. Quantitative Disclosures: Amount of the Bank s Exposures Outstanding Gross Advances (including Rated & Unrated) in Major Risk Buckets after factoring Risk Mitigants under Standardized Approach. (` in Millions ) Risk Weight Category Amount Advances Fund Based Risk weight Below 100 % 1,157,502.74 Risk weight of 100 % 531,162.59 Risk weight more than 100 % 203,172.12 Deducted-CRM 135,517.22 Total 2,027,354.67 Non-Fund Based Risk weight Below 100 % 116,302.72 Risk weight of 100 % 61,154.84 Risk weight more than 100 % 38,365.29 Deducted-CRM 21,236.11 Total 2,37,058.96 Investments (Banking Book) Risk weight Below 100 % 417,568.14 Risk weight of 100 % 0.00 Risk weight more than 100 % 723.09 Deducted from capital 3.00 Total 418,294.23 Page 14 of 15

Table DF-18: Leverage ratio common disclosure template Item Leverage Ratio Framework (` in Millions) On-balance sheet exposures 1 On-balance sheet items (excluding derivatives and SFTs, but including collateral) 3,121,485.75 2 (Asset amounts deducted in determining Basel III Tier 1 capital) (605) 3 Total on-balance sheet exposures (excluding derivatives and SFTs) (sum of lines 1 and 2) 3,120,880.75 Derivative exposures 4 Replacement cost associated with all derivatives transactions (i.e. net of eligible cash variation margin) 8,431.43 5 Add-on amounts for PFE associated with all derivatives transactions 11,693.49 6 Gross-up for derivatives collateral provided where deducted from the balance sheet assets pursuant to the operative accounting framework - 7 (Deductions of receivables assets for cash variation margin provided in derivatives transactions) - 8 (Exempted CCP leg of client-cleared trade exposures) - 9 Adjusted effective notional amount of written credit derivatives - 10 (Adjusted effective notional offsets and add-on deductions for written credit derivatives) - 11 Total derivative exposures (sum of lines 4 to 10) 20,124.92 Securities financing transaction exposures 12 Gross SFT assets (with no recognition of netting), after adjusting for sale accounting transactions 961.30 13 (Netted amounts of cash payables and cash receivables of gross SFT assets) - 14 CCR exposure for SFT assets - 15 Agent transaction exposures - 16 Total securities financing transaction exposures (sum of lines 12 to 15) 961.30 Other off-balance sheet exposures 17 Off-balance sheet exposure at gross notional amount 401,077.33 18 (Adjustments for conversion to credit equivalent amounts) (236,207.12) 19 Off-balance sheet items (sum of lines 17 and 18) 164,870.21 Capital and Other Exposures 20 Tier 1 capital 161,674.70 21 Total exposures (sum of lines 3, 11, 16 and 19) 3,306,837.19 Leverage ratio 22 Basel III leverage ratio 4.89 Page 15 of 15