Working (Poor) Families

Similar documents
POVERTY IN AUSTRALIA: NEW ESTIMATES AND RECENT TRENDS RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR THE 2016 REPORT

Income Inequality and Tax-Transfer Policy: Trends and Questions

Distributional analysis to accompany Budget 2015

NATSEM

Income Poverty, Subjective Poverty and Financial Stress

Poverty in Australia 2018: Methods, Findings and Implications

MAKING A DIFFERENCE: THE IMPACT OF GOVERNMENT POLICY ON CHILD POVERTY IN AUSTRALIA, 1982 TO

Poverty Lines: Australia

Poverty Lines: Australia

Modelling of the Federal Budget Personal Income Tax Measures

Poverty Lines: Australia

THE DYNAMICS OF CHILD POVERTY IN AUSTRALIA

Poverty in Australia 2016

The Poverty Line Revisited

Worlds Apart: Postcodes with the Highest and Lowest Poverty Rates in Today's Australia

Poverty and Income Inequality in Scotland: 2013/14 A National Statistics publication for Scotland

PENSIONS POLICY INSTITUTE. Automatic enrolment changes

Support through the welfare system

Superannuation: the Right Balance?

Australian Council of Social Service Submission on minimum wages 2013

Going Without: Financial Hardship in Australia

Findings of the 2018 HILDA Statistical Report

Estimating lifetime socio-economic disadvantage in the Australian Indigenous population and returns to education

Disadvantage in the ACT

Strengthening Australia s retirement income system. Submission to the review of Australia s retirement incomes system

Financial Disadvantage. in Australia

THE OECD TAX-BENEFIT MODEL. Contacts:

Estimating Internet Access for Welfare Recipients in Australia

TAX-BENEFIT POLICIES AND PARENTS INCENTIVES TO WORK THE CASE OF AUSTRALIA

The principles of GIA and their application to an analysis of Australia s retirement incomes and savings policies

Fair Work Commission Fair Work Act Annual Wage Review Submission in Reply by the Australian Catholic Council for Employment Relations

Worlds Apart: Postcodes with the Highest and Lowest Poverty Rates in Today's Australia

Income Poverty. Chris Belfield 16 th July Institute for Fiscal Studies

Framing public policy from an intrahousehold gendered perspective. The cases of the UK, Australia and Germany since the mid-nineties.

Are retirement savings on track?

A Briefing from The Children s Society The Distributional Impact of the Benefit Cap

HOUSING BENEFITS IN THE CHILD BENEFIT PACKAGE IN 22 COUNTRIES

Industrial Relations Legislation Policy Background Paper

Income Mobility and Financial Disadvantage: Australian Children

Why is understanding our population forecasts important?

Personal Income Tax Cuts and the new Child Care Subsidy: Do They Address High Effective Marginal Tax Rates on Women s Work?

AIST-Mercer Super Tracker. Presenter: Dr David Knox, Mercer Chair: Karen Volpato, AIST

Distributive Impact of Low-Income Support Measures in Japan

What is the Employer s responsibility? Basically, eligible employers must offer affordable coverage to all eligible employees Or pay a penalty.

IRELAND. to be fully unemployed for at least 3 days in any period of 6 consecutive days;

Basic Income as a policy option: Can it add up?

Household Stimulus Package

The Fleurieu & Kangaroo Island (State Govt) Region. Workforce Wizard Region Report

Poverty, Inequality and the Welfare State

The Limestone Coast (State Govt) Region. Workforce Wizard Region Report

Saving Tomorrow. The saving and spending patterns of Australians

UNPACKING INEQUALITY: WAGE INCOMES, DISPOSABLE INCOMES AND LIVING STANDARDS

RESTRICTED: STATISTICS

Australian Council of Social Service. Poverty in Australia

APPSIM Modelling the Labour Force

Income inequality and mobility in Australia over the last decade

Child maintenance and poverty reduction in lone parent families: analysis of typical cases in UK, US, NZ and Australia

Optimal policy modelling: a microsimulation methodology for setting the Australian tax and transfer system

// Inequality & poverty in Australia: The case against the removal of the clean energy supplement. David Richardson Matt Grudnoff

SUBMISSION TO THE AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION REGARDING THE ACTU LIVING WAGE APPLICATIONS. by Leigh Harkness

SELF-EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL SECURITY

Exiting Poverty: Does Sex Matter?

Analysing Australia s Ageing Population: A Demographic Picture

Australia Indigenous Portrait

Evanston South - Suburb Profile

Housing affordability Keeping a home on a low-income

Evidence in public policy Paul Johnson SRA annual conference 14 December Institute for Fiscal Studies

Staying the Course? Inter-generational Implications of Budget Repair

Raising minimum income floors: old and new ways

Government can choose to reduce poverty and hardship by taking three steps:

Assessing Developments and Prospects in the Australian Welfare State

ACTU MINIMUM WAGES SUBMISSION ACTU Written Submission. January 2004

The Dynamics of Multidimensional Poverty in Australia

EVIDENCE ON INEQUALITY AND THE NEED FOR A MORE PROGRESSIVE TAX SYSTEM

The impact of tax and benefit reforms by sex: some simple analysis

P o v e r t y T r e n d s b y Family Type, Highlights. What do we mean by families and unattached individuals?

Comparing welfare regimes by their effects on intra-household inequalities

IMPROVING WORK INCENTIVES IN A MEANS- TESTED WELFARE SYSTEM: THE 1994 AUSTRALIAN SOCIAL SECURITY REFORMS

Distributional Implications of the Welfare State

Analogue Entitlements in a Digital Age

Documentation of Indicators

The Kangaroo Island (DC) Region. Workforce Wizard Region Report

Trends in Income and Expenditure Inequality in the 1980s and 1990s

Families, Incomes and Jobs, Volume 6

Background briefing on franking credits

Poverty in Australia

What is the Minimum Income Standard (MIS) in the UK and how has it been used to inform policy?

Trends in Public Opinion towards Welfare in Australia

The 2015 Intergenerational Report A snapshot

Increasing the EITC Will Boost New Jersey s Workers and Their Families

GENDER EQUITY IN THE TAX SYSTEM FOR FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY

The gender wage gap in Australia: causes, costs, and the future?

Poverty in Australia

Investing for our Future Welfare. Peter Whiteford, ANU

Dynamics of Financial Disadvantage

Distributional Modelling of Effective Marginal Tax Rates: Work-in-progress only

AUSTRALIA Overview of the tax-benefit system

Inequality and Poverty in Japan. Toshiaki TACHIBANAKI Japanese Economic Review 57(1), March 2006

We can afford fair GST reform

Emerging Issues for Community Sector Leaders. #EmergingIssues2018

Transcription:

Working (Poor) Families Trends in working poverty in Australia 1997-2006 Alicia Payne Australian Institute of Family Studies Conference 2008 10 July 2008

Working poverty in Australia In Australia working is generally a guarantee against poverty ( the( wage-earners earners welfare state Castles) Tradition of wage regulation, the social wage Australia does not have working poverty in the sense that some other countries do, e.g. US Work-life balance, low fertility rate, expansion of family payments - income support for families a government priority However a proportion of Australian families fall beneath the poverty line in spite of having working members Previous study by Eardley (SPRC) 1998 2

3 Methodology Poverty measurement is contentious 2005-06 06 ABS Survey of Income and Housing Costs, previous surveys to 1997-98 98 Poverty line set at half median modified OECD equivalent disposable household income - $591 per week for couple with 2 children Households with 0 or negative incomes removed from sample (Saunders and Bradbury, 2006) Working households: at least one person employed part or full-time, no one self-employed employed in household Results for persons in households, not households

Overall and Working Poverty rates 1997-2006 Proportion of population (%) 12 10.1 10.4 10.8 10.9 9.9 8.9 8 Working poverty Overall poverty 3.8 4.3 3.7 3.7 4 2.9 2.9 0 1997-98 1999-00 2000-01 2002-03 2003-04 2005-06 4

How many people are in poverty? 1, 171, 900 households below the poverty line 2, 151, 300 people 394, 000 of them children 149, 900 working poor households 429, 500 people 89, 700 of them children 5

Proportion of all people in poverty in working households 2005-06 06 Working 20% Not working or self employed 80% 6

Poverty rates for people in working households by composition of workers, 2005-06 06 12 Poverty Rate (%) 10 8 6 4 2 0 10.5 2.4 2.1 One Part-time worker One Full-time worker Two workers, at least one Part-time 7

People in working poor households by worker composition, 2005-06 06 Two workers, at least one Part-time 31% One Parttime worker 46% One Fulltime worker 23% 8

Family type Working poverty Overall poverty Sole parent* 8% Lone person 8% Other* 3% Couple without dep. Children 23% Lone person 31% Other 3% Couple without dep. Children 24% Couple with dep. Children 58% Sole parent 14% Couple with dep. Children 28% 9

Overall poverty by family type 1997-2006 40 Poverty rate (%) 30 20 10 0 1997-98 1999-00 2000-01 2002-03 2003-04 2005-06 Couple without dep. Children Couple with dep. Children Sole Parent Lone Person 10

40 Rates of poverty and working poverty for couples with children and lone people 1997-2006 Poverty rate (%) 30 20 10 0 1997-98 1999-00 2000-01 2002-03 2003-04 2005-06 Couple with dep. Children Working poverty Couple with dep. Children Lone Person Working poverty Lone Person 11

Couples with children and lone people as % of those in poverty, 1997-2006 80 Proportion (%) 60 40 20 0 1997-98 1999-00 2000-01 2002-03 2003-04 2005-06 Couple with dep. Children as % working poverty Lone person as % working poverty Couple with dep. Children as % overall poverty Lone person as % overall poverty 12

Principal source of income Working poverty Overall Poverty Govt. benefit 32% Other* 8% Wages and salary 60% Govt. benefit 77% Other* 11% Wages and salary 12% 13

Number of benefit recipients in household Working poverty Overall poverty Two or more* 25% None 28% Two or more 34% None 11% One 47% One 55% 14

Poverty Gap Working poverty Overall poverty $100 or more 52% $0 to $49 33% $100 or more 33% $0 to $49 48% $50 to $99 15% $50 to $99 19% 15

Highest qualification of household reference person Working poverty Overall poverty Uni.* 17% Less than year 12 38% Cert. or diploma 24% Uni. 10% Less than year 12 54% 16 Cert. or diploma 28% Year 12 17% Year 12 12%

Area of residence Working poverty Overall poverty Rest of state 25% Rest of state 39% Capital city 75% Capital city 61% 17

Summary While employment generally keeps Australian households out of poverty, just under 3% of people (429, 500) remain in poverty when someone in the household works Having 2 FT workers does generally keep household incomes above the poverty line, but combinations of less working hours / workers does not necessarily 20% of Australians in poverty live in a household where someone works Profile of working poverty is different to that of overall poverty 18

Summary (cont.) People in working poor households are more likely than those in all poor households to: Be couples with children Have wages and salary as principal source of income To have no recipients of government benefits in the household Be in deeper poverty To have higher levels of education To live in capital cities 19

Stay in touch with new research NATSEM research freely available from www.natsem.canberra.edu.au To stay in touch via email notification of new research: Hotline@natsem.canberra.edu.au 20