INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

Similar documents
SLUGGISH HOUSEHOLD GROWTH

The state of the nation s Housing 2013

(Table A-2). Again, this is the first time in recorded history. Plumbing the Depths. Promising Signs. The State of the Nation s Housing 2010

2019 Outlook. January

Housing Recovery is Underway, But Not for Everyone

SINGLE-FAMILY SLOWDOWN

DEMOGRAPHIC DRIVERS. Household growth is picking up pace. With more. than a million young foreign-born adults arriving

THE HOUSING MARKET REVIVAL

From Crisis to Transition Demographic trends and American housing futures, with lessons from Texas

Demographic Drivers. Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University 11

PRESS RELEASE. Home Prices Continue Climbing in June 2013 According to the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices

Addendum to: The Community Reinvestment Act: A Welcome Anomaly in the Foreclosure Crisis

Emerging Trends in Real Estate 2016

Emerging Trends in Real Estate 2014

State of the U.S. Multifamily Market. Q Review and Forecast

GRIM CONSTRUCTION AND SALES REPORTS

AEI Center on Housing Markets and Finance Announces Ten Best and Worst Metro Areas to Be a First Time Homebuyer

Econometric Advisors APARTMENT OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK Q4 2017

AND LABOR TRENDS EMERGING TRENDS IN THE REMODELING MARKET JOINT CENTER FOR HOUSING STUDIES OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY 11

A Divided Real Estate Nation

CBRE CAP RATE SURVEY. A CBRE Publication. First Half Click to Enter

The State of the Nation s Housing Report 2017

U.S. HOME FLIPPING IN Q AT LOWEST LEVEL SINCE Q WHILE AVERAGE GROSS PROFITS CLIMB TO NEW RECORD HIGH

Addendum to: The Community Reinvestment Act: A Welcome Anomaly in the Foreclosure Crisis

Managing Your Money: "Housing and Public Policy the Bubble, Present, and Future

COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE PRICES INCREASE A MODEST 1.1% IN FOURTH QUARTER AS PROPERTY PRICING LEVELS OFF IN DECEMBER

Executive Summary. Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University 1

JOINT CENTER FOR HOUSING STUDIES OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY

U.S. ECONOMIC & PROPERTY MARKET PERSPECTIVE

Homeownership. Cycling Demand

COMMERCIAL. first look

Key Findings from Recent Joint Center Research Chris Herbert Real Estate Trends in Central Ohio January 26, 2017

The U.S. and California Is The Recovery Here at Last? UCLA Anderson School of

DALLAS-FORT WORTH METRO

Struggling to Escape the Fallout of the Great Recession MARISA Di NATALE, MANAGING DIRECTOR

The Future of Transit in a Fiscally Constrained Political Environment (Draft) By Wendell Cox Principal, Demographia St.

Data Brief. Trends in Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Premiums and Employee Contributions in Major Metropolitan Areas,

Metropolitan Area Statistics (4Q 2012)

INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL INTELLIGENCE REPORT. School of Business. Fourth Quarter 2018 CENTER FOR ECONOMIC FORECASTING & DE VELOPMENT

50-State Property Tax Comparison Study: For Taxes Paid in Executive Summary

UC Berkeley Fisher Center Working Papers

U.S. Market Overview

THE LOOMING CHALLENGE OF U.S. COMPETITIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR PHILADELPHIA

2015 REAL ESTATE ECONOMIC FORECAST The National Economy and What It Means For Real Estate

CYCLE FORECAST Real Estate Market Cycles First Quarter 2018 Estimates May 2017

RETAIL CONTINUES TO STRUGGLE AS IMPROVEMENTS ARE NOT YET SUSTAINED

ERRATA. To: Recipients of MG-388-RC, Estimating Terrorism Risk, RAND Corporation Publications Department. Date: December 2005

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Ann Marie Gorden/Robert Nihen

HOMEOWNERSHIP. Low interest rates, stronger job growth, and. rapid house price appreciation all helped to. sustain the homeownership boom through its

Cycle Monitor Real Estate Market Cycles First Quarter 2018 Analysis

We believe in in the power of a vision. Investor Presentation

Office. Office. IRR Viewpoint 2015

SEPTEMBER S&P CORELOGIC CASE-SHILLER NATIONAL HOME PRICE NSA INDEX UP 6.2% IN LAST 12 MONTHS

RETAIL SECTOR CONTINUES TO IMPROVE, DESPITE DROP IN CONSUMER CONFIDENCE

Cycle Monitor Real Estate Market Cycles Fourth Quarter 2017 Analysis

Metro Washington, DC State of the Market

Office of the Chief Economist National Credit Union Administration. Economic Overview. California State Examiner School.

AIA / COMPENSATION REPORT Compensation Report 2015 SAMPLE CHAPTER

STATE OF THE REAL ESTATE MARKET FALL Robert J. Strachota MAI, MCBA, CRE, FIBA 35 th Annual Real Estate Institute November 2, 2017 CLE

The Single-Family Outlook and its Impact on Multifamily

The Housing Market and the Macroeconomy. Karl E. Case. University of North Carolina February 18, 2010

2007 Outlook for Southern California Housing

STRONG MARKET FUNDAMENTALS SUPPORT BROAD PRICE GAINS IN MAY

Capital Market Update. February 10, 2011 Marc Louargand, Ph.D., CRE, FRICS Principal SALTASH PARTNERS LLC investing in American ingenuity

S&P CORELOGIC CASE-SHILLER NATIONAL HOME PRICE NSA INDEX CONTINUES STEADY GAINS IN OCTOBER

Regional Snapshot: The Cost of Living in Metro Atlanta

2014 U.S. Census (2015) Median African-American Household Income Rank, Memphis Included. Household Median Income Ranking, African American Population

CAPITALIZATION RATES BY PROPERTY TYPE

MetroMonitor Tracking Economic Recession and Recovery in America s 100 Largest Metropolitan Areas

Planning for the. Thinking Big & Taking The Long View. Jane Hayse Director, Center for Livable Communities Atlanta Regional Commission

US Housing Market Outlook

2015 Year End Market Watch January December Sales Comparison

Q1 16 ECONOMIC OUTLOOK Washington Metro Area

U.S. and New England Economic Conditions and Outlook

COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE PRICES MIXED: GENERAL COMMERCIAL SECTOR GAINS MOMENTUM WHILE INVESTMENT GRADE SEES SEASONAL DIP

THE STATE OF THE NATION S HOUSING. Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University

file:///c:/users/cathy/appdata/local/microsoft/windows/temporary Int...

ehealth Inventory Report of Major Medical Health Plans Available Off of Government Exchanges

Local Consumer Commerce

GDP projections for major economies

RENTAL MARKETS LOCALLY AND ACROSS THE COUNTRY: A YEAR OF CHANGE. Dr. Skylar Olsen, Senior Economist Zillow.com/research

GlobeSt.com Commercial Real Estate News and Property Resource

Emerging Trends in Real Estate Sustaining Momentum but Taking Nothing for Granted

COMPOSITE PRICE INDICES FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SOARED IN 2015

Was it all for N 0 u g h t? The 00 Decade and the Year Ahead. Tony Pierson Cornerstone Real Estate Advisers LLC. Real Estate Conference

Metropolitan Washington Area Key Economic & Demographic Indicators

Comments on Forecasts

New Developments in Housing Policy

Milwaukee's Housing Crisis: Housing Affordability and Mortgage Lending Practices

U.S. Property Markets Shake Off Slowdown and Power On

Florida: An Economic Overview

CYCLE FORECAST Real Estate Market Cycles Third Quarter 2017 Estimates November 2016

Joseph L. Carter Executive Vice President November 2014

JOINT CENTER FOR HOUSING STUDIES OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY

Adults in Their Late 30s Most Concerned More Americans Worry about Financing Retirement

Macroeconomic Overview: The Sunbelt Continues To Shine. Michael Cohen Director of Advisory Services Property & Portfolio Research ULI SOUTH CAROLINA

Captain CREDIT Crunch

S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices

Reverse Mortgage Originations and Performance in Philadelphia

The Economic Outlook for 2007

Transcription:

1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Rising house prices and incomes, an aging housing stock, and a pickup in household growth are all contributing to today s strong home improvement market. Demand is robust in coastal metros with especially high house values and household incomes. Demographic trends should continue to buoy the market over the next decade, with the rising tide of older homeowners accounting for more than threequarters of projected growth. Although the huge millennial generation is set to shape future spending trends, younger households have been slow to break into homeownership and the remodeling market. ACROSS-THE-BOARD SPENDING GAINS Spending on improvements, maintenance, and repairs including outlays by both homeowners and rental property owners reached a record high in nominal terms of $34 billion in 215, according to the latest estimates from the Joint Center for Housing Studies (Figure 1). This is an increase of 12 percent from the 213 level and 7 percent from the recent market peak before adjusting for inflation. Market spending continued to climb in 216, up an estimated 6 percent to $361 billion. With national house prices back to pre-recession levels and both household incomes and existing home sales on the rise, further growth is anticipated for 217. Figure 1 With All Segments Growing, the Home Remodeling Market Has Surpassed Its Previous Peak Billions of Dollars 4 34 35 318 2 33 289 3 18 31 232 25 217 23 25 34 2 15 25 32 46 43 24 22 32 38 277 284 21 34 21 31 47 5 175 182 198 29 211 213 57 52 37 1 22 197 5 34 135 138 21 23 221 25 Owner Improvements Owner Maintenance 27 215 Rental Improvements Rental Maintenance Sources: JCHS analysis of US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), American Housing Surveys; US Department of Commerce, Retail Sales of Building Materials and Survey of Expenditures for Residential Improvement and Repairs (C-5); and JCHS Research Notes, October 21 and April 216. D E M O G R A P H I C C H A N G E A N D T H E R E M O D E L I N G O U T LO O K J O I N T C E N T E R FO R H O U S I N G S T U D I E S O F H A R VA R D U N I V E R S I T Y 1

The recent cycles in spending on the owner-occupied and rental stocks differ in timing and magnitude. Homeowner improvement spending fell sharply between 27 and 29 as house prices across the country went into a steep dive. The national recovery has been slow, reflecting the uneven rebound in house prices across metro areas and the overall decline in the homeownership rate. Rental improvement spending, in contrast, has surged since 211 in response to soaring demand for rental housing. Within the homeowner improvement market, the shares of spending in the two major project categories (discretionary and replacement) have also shifted since the downturn. Discretionary projects (including kitchen and bath remodels, room additions, and outside attachments) accounted for more than 4 percent of outlays in 27 but a third of spending in 215. Over this same period, the share of spending on replacement projects (including exterior and interior replacements and systems and equipment upgrades) increased from just over 4 percent to more than half. As the home improvement recovery continues, investment in discretionary projects is expected to drive overall market growth, with high-spending households contributing a disproportionate share of outlays. Indeed, over the past 2 years, the top 5 percent of spenders on average accounted for at least a third and up to half of annual spending. Thus, while the share of owners that report spending on home improvements is fairly stable over time, average per owner outlays vary considerably (Figure 2). The recent strength of discretionary projects has pushed up the home improvement and repair share of total residential construction spending at a time when the homebuilding recovery is still in progress. During the latter half of the 199s and extending into the first half of the 2s, the home improvement and repair share hovered around 4 percent of total residential investment, before rising to a peak of 7 percent during the housing downturn. The improvement share is now edging back toward half, where it is likely to stabilize. GEOGRAPHIC CONCENTRATION OF HIGH-SPENDING HOMEOWNERS Even with widespread growth in the overall market, homeowner improvement expenditures are concentrated in metro areas with high house values and household incomes (Figure 3). The 25 major metros tracked by the 215 American Housing Survey accounted for almost $1 billion in owner home improvement spending, or about 45 percent of the national total. Per owner spending of $3,4 in these metros was also about 15 percent above the 215 national average. The 25 major metros generally have elevated home values, driven in part by high homeowner incomes. The median home value of almost $27, in these areas is more than a third higher than the national median, while the median owner income of $83, is more than 15 percent higher. Owners in these markets not only have an incentive to make improvements to their homes to protect their larger investments, but they also benefit from higher home equity (generated by stronger house price appreciation) to fund those investments. Figure 2 Owner Spending Levels Not the Share Doing Projects Drive Market Growth 215 Dollars 4, Percent 8 3,5 3, 2,5 2,13 2, 2,23 2,29 2,49 2,45 3,19 2,53 3,33 2,53 2,52 2,66 7 2,97 6 5 4 1,5 3 1, 2 5 1 1995 1997 1999 21 23 25 27 29 211 213 215 Average Per Owner Improvement Spending (Left axis) Share of Owners Reporting Projects (Right axis) Source: JCHS tabulations of HUD, American Housing Surveys. 2 JOINT CENTER FOR HOUSING STUDIES OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE AND THE REMODELING OUTLOOK

Figure 3 Homeowners in Western and Northeastern Metros Generally Spend Most on Improvements Average Per Owner Spending in 215 (Dollars) Less than 2,8 (Down to 2,11) 2,8 3,499 Seattle Portland 3,5 or More (Up to 5,34) Boston Milwaukee Chicago Detroit Cleveland Pittsburgh New York Philadelphia San Francisco Denver Kansas City Cincinnati Washington, DC Los Angeles Riverside Memphis Raleigh Phoenix Atlanta Dallas Houston New Orleans Miami Note: Per owner spending for the 25 metros averaged $3,4 in 215. Source: Table A-8. However, continued growth in home improvement spending in top markets may be challenged by the lack of affordable options for potential homebuyers. Nationally, the median house price is three times higher than the median household income. But in the top ten metros for per owner spending, house prices run five times incomes on average. And in San Francisco and Los Angeles, the price-to-income ratio is about nine. These price trends may delay or prevent many younger households from buying homes, thus excluding them from the improvement market. Homeownership rates for households under age 35 are already depressed in a growing number of expensive markets. And younger households that are able to buy in these metros invest proportionately less in their homes than younger owners in more affordable markets. HOMEBUYING CHALLENGES FOR MILLENNIALS Younger households face a variety of challenges when it comes to homeownership. As of 215, adults under age 35 made up 19 percent of households nationally but less than 1 percent of homeowners. Indeed, the homeownership rate for the under- 35 age group fell from 43 percent in 25 to a historic low of 31 percent in 215 double the national percentage-point decline reported in the American Housing Survey. The sharp downturn in the economy during the Great Recession and the ensuing weak recovery are in part to blame, with many younger households affected by slow job growth and weak income gains. Many of these households are also burdened with high levels of student debt. Moreover, tight credit markets and a general retreat from lending to the residential sector have also made it more difficult for even qualified households to buy homes. The challenging economy and changing social trends have led to delays in marriage and childbearing, the stages in life when households often buy homes. Concerns have arisen that, independent of economic and demographic factors, many younger households may not necessarily prefer to own. The claim is that many millennials want to live in urban locations closer to employment, commercial, and social centers; prefer the flexibility of renting; and are unwilling to take on the financial risks of ownership in the wake of the housing market collapse. The evidence suggests, however, that homeownership decisions by younger households have much more to do with affordability than location and lifestyle preferences. Homeownership rates for the under-35 age group are in fact generally higher in metro areas where house prices are relatively low, such as DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE AND THE REMODELING OUTLOOK JOINT CENTER FOR HOUSING STUDIES OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY 3

Figure 4 Outlays for Home Renovations Increase Sharply After Owners Reach Their Mid-3s Average Annual Per Owner Improvement Spending, 211 215 (215 dollars) 3,5 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 2,34 Under 35 3,6 3,3 3, 35 44 45 54 55 64 65 and Over All Source: JCHS tabulations of HUD, American Housing Surveys. Age of Homeowner 2,2 2,72 Birmingham, Detroit, Minneapolis, St. Louis, and Salt Lake City. Indeed, a Joint Center analysis found a more than 5 percentage point difference in the homeownership rates of younger households in metros where house prices were 2 percent below the national median and those where prices were 2 percent above the national median. This perhaps explains the higher homeownership rates for younger households in small towns and rural areas than in metro areas. If the relatively low homeownership rate of the under-35 age group in fact reflects fundamental economic and demographic factors, their improvement spending may increase as they move into middle age and if job and wage growth pick up. In general, remodeling expenditures rise sharply among owners age 35 and over, thanks to higher incomes and growing families. Spending remains at this elevated level until homeowners approach their retirement years (Figure 4). Given their late start toward homeownership, however, the ability of the millennial generation to catch up with the pace of home improvement spending among previous generations is uncertain. If households now under age 35 do not experience similar economic progress and demographic changes as the gen-xers and baby boomers at the same stage of life, the typical jump in home improvement spending may well occur later and not continue long enough to make up for earlier deficits. DEMOGRAPHIC DRIVERS IN THE DECADE AHEAD Homeowner improvement spending should post healthy 2. percent average annual growth over the coming decade, with inflation-adjusted expenditures increasing from just over $22 billion in 215 to almost $27 billion in 225, according to Joint Center projections (Figure 5). Almost half of these gains are expected to result from an increase in average per owner spending as incomes and home values rise. Growth in the number of homeowners will account for the other half of spending gains. Although members of the millennial generation have so far been slow to live on their own, the number of younger households should rise as the economy continues to improve. At the same time, older adults are increasingly able to remain in their homes as they age. As a result, the Joint Center projects a solid 13.6 million net increase in the number of households over the coming decade. As younger households move into homeownership, they will supplement the already thriving improvement market. Gen- Xers are now in their prime remodeling years, and while some are still recovering from home equity losses after the housing crash, many in this generation will undertake discretionary projects deferred during the downturn. Meanwhile, the babyboom generation has led home improvement spending for the past 2 years, and their influence shows no signs of waning. Their increased longevity and desire to live independently into old age will boost demand for remodeling projects that improve the accessibility of their homes. At the same time, however, a large number of older households will be unable to live on their own for health or financial reasons. As they move in with family, into nursing facilities or otherwise cease being a household, they will provide an important source of housing for tomorrow s owners. Joint Center projections suggest that such dissolutions of older households will free up more than 12 million housing units on net in 215 225. Many of these homes are well-suited for younger families in that they are typically older and more affordable. And given that older households generally live in their homes for some time and spend little on improvements in their later years, younger buyers of these homes will likely want to invest in significant upgrades. THE REMODELING INDUSTRY OUTLOOK While currently on solid footing, the home improvement industry faces a mix of challenges and opportunities. At the top of the challenge list is housing affordability. House prices nationally, at least on a nominal basis, have recovered nearly all of the ground 4 JOINT CENTER FOR HOUSING STUDIES OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE AND THE REMODELING OUTLOOK

Figure 5 Homeowner Improvement Spending Is Poised for Solid Growth Over the Coming Decade 215 Dollars Billions of 215 Dollars 4, 4 3,19 3,33 3,9 3,25 2,97 3, 2,66 3 2,49 2,45 2,52 2,13 2,23 2,29 2,53 269 252 2, 239 243 2 221 18 177 193 192 21 1, 135 146 157 1 1995 1997 1999 21 23 25 27 29 211 213 215 22 (Projected) Average Per Owner Spending (Left axis) Aggregate Spending (Right axis) 225 (Projected) Sources: JCHS tabulations of HUD, American Housing Surveys; JCHS 217 Remodeling Projections. lost during the downturn, and long-term interest rates have started to tick up. Rising prices not only make homeownership more difficult for younger adults, but also leave those who are able to buy with fewer resources to make improvements. And while high rents may provide an incentive to buy homes, they also make it difficult to save for a downpayment. At the same time, however, affordability considerations are likely to make older and outdated homes attractive to younger buyers, thus generating opportunities for improvement projects. And as a new generation of owners enters the remodeling market, several niches are likely to see significant growth. Energy-efficient products and systems, as well as alternative energy sources such as solar and geothermal, are likely to continue to gain popularity. Demand is also growing for sustainable home improvements, including projects that make use of renewable and recycled building products, improve water conservation, and address indoor health concerns. Home automation encompassing everything from entertainment systems to home energy management, lighting, appliance control, and security is emerging as an especially strong growth market, particularly among younger households. DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE AND THE REMODELING OUTLOOK JOINT CENTER FOR HOUSING STUDIES OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY 5