Global Trends in Risk-based Supervision: MAPFRE s view

Similar documents
Actuaries and the Regulatory Environment. Role of the Actuary in the Solvency II framework

WHITE PAPER. Solvency II Compliance and beyond: Title The essential steps for insurance firms

CONSULTATION DOCUMENT

The Solvency II project and the work of CEIOPS

Insurance Europe Position Paper on the Solvency II Reporting Package. ECO-SLV Date: 15 May 2012

February 13, RE: Consultation Regarding Risk-based Global Insurance Capital Standards

UPDATE ON PROGRESS WITH THE SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (SAM) PROJECT

Solvency II Update. Latest developments and industry challenges (Session 10) Réjean Besner

EIOPA-CP-13/ March Cover note for the Consultation on Guidelines on preparing for Solvency II

Preserving regulatory certainty: The review of insurers capital requirements

The Review of Solvency II. 01/02/2018 Hans De Cuyper, President of Assuralia

2013 Conference Risk, Recovery & Real Growth" 23rd Annual CAA Conference Secrets Wild Orchid Montego Bay, Jamaica. 4 th to 6 th December 2013

Essential adjustments for the success of Solvency II for groups

Solvency Assessment and Management (SAM)

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX

EIOPA s first set of advice to the European Commission on specific items in the Solvency II Delegated Regulation

CEIOPS-DOC-61/10 January Former Consultation Paper 65

S Solvency Capital Requirement for groups using the standard formula and partial internal model

Solvency II: finally final

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

Introduction. Regulatory environment in Legal Context

EIOPACP 13/010. Guidelines on Submission of Information to National Competent Authorities

Report on the use of capital add-ons 2017

SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (SAM) FRAMEWORK

Feedback. of the German Insurance Association (GDV) ID-Nummer on the Roadmap for a Fitness check of supervisory reporting requirements

EIOPA consultation on 2 nd set of ITS and GL

Solvency II. Yannis Pitaras IACPM Brussels, 15 May 2009

EIOPA Final Report on Public Consultations No. 13/011 on the Proposal for Guidelines on the Pre!application for Internal Models

Framework for a New Standard Approach to Setting Capital Requirements. Joint Committee of OSFI, AMF, and Assuris

Ben S Bernanke: Modern risk management and banking supervision

14 July Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities. Submitted online at

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

Cover note for the draft consultation papers on the Guidelines and ITS for Solvency II (set 2)

Final Report. Public Consultation No. 14/036 on. Guidelines on undertaking-specific. parameters

11 th July 2011

Regulatory Watch. European Commission s proposal on structural reforms

Understanding the prudential balance sheet. Lars Dieckhoff Principal expert Solvency II

Solvency II and the Work of CEIOPS

Solvency II Where do we stand? Consumer Protection Where do we go?

Delegations will find below a Presidency compromise text on the above Commission proposal, to be discussed at the 28 February 2011 meeting.

Response to European Commission consultation on the evaluation of the financial conglomerate directive (FICOD) ECO-SLV-16 Date: 20 September 2016

Solvency II Implementation

Consultation Paper on the draft proposal for Guidelines on reporting and public disclosure

TEMPLATE C FOR THE DISCLOSURE OF QUANTITATIVE AGGREGATE STATISTICAL DATA ON THE SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY

Draft amendment to Commission. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2452 of 2 December 2015 laying. down implementing technical standards

Insurance sector update. CMS Cameron McKenna LLP 15 October 2013

Shadow Banking. June Avocats à la Cour

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Understanding the prudential balance sheet. Lars Dieckhoff Principal expert Solvency II

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /.. of XXX

Deadline: cob

Solvency II reporting: The three pillars

Final Report on Public Consultation No. 14/017 on Guidelines on system of governance

Initial comments on the Proposal for a Solvency II framework Directive (COM (2007) 361 of 10 July

January CNB opinion on Commission consultation document on Solvency II implementing measures

EIOPA's Supervisory Statement. Solvency II: Solvency and Financial Condition Report

Deutsche Börse Group Position Paper on the revised large exposure regime Page 1 of 7. A. Introduction

Introductory Speech. The Solvency II Review: What happens next? Conference on "The review of Solvency II organised by the National Bank of Belgium

Solvency II Position on the calculation of the Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR)

The future of life insurance, Solvency II and investment strategies

Response to EIOPA consultation on corrections and amendments to implementing technical standards on reporting and disclosure

Solvency Assessment and Management: Pillar 2 - Sub Committee ORSA and Use Test Task Group Discussion Document 35 (v 3) Use Test

Solvency II, linking risk with capital

Feedback statement. Responses to the public consultation on a draft Guideline and Recommendation of the European Central Bank

Supervisory Statement SS15/15 Solvency II: approvals. March Appendix 2.15

Number Date Reference

Society of Actuaries in Ireland Solvency II for Beginners. Mike Frazer. 19 May 2011

Council of the European Union Brussels, 6 March 2018 (OR. en)

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of

Deloitte Audit Reform Briefing: Unprecedented reform proposed for the EU audit market

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

(Text with EEA relevance)

Advisory Guidelines of the Financial Supervision Authority. Requirements to the internal capital adequacy assessment process

International Insurance Regulation 101: International Association of Insurance Supervisors

Gregg Clifton. CFO Aurigen Reinsurance

Strengthening the Oversight and Regulation of Shadow Banking

Karel VAN HULLE. Head of Unit, Insurance and Pensions, DG Markt, European Commission

Solvency II. Insurance and Pensions Unit, European Commission

Frequently Asked Questions for The global risk-based Insurance Capital Standard (ICS) Updated 21 July 2017

Prudential Standard GOI 3 Risk Management and Internal Controls for Insurers

We referred to ICP 20 which deals with public disclosures and is therefore directly comparable to the SFCR.

Subject: Request to EIOPA for an opinion on sustainability within Solvency II

Public consultation. on a draft Addendum to the ECB Guide on options and discretions available in Union law. Explanatory memorandum

Opinion of the European Banking Authority on transitional arrangements and credit risk adjustments due to the introduction of IFRS 9

Insurance Supervision in Europe

Critical Reflection of Two State-of-the-Art Risk Management Frameworks (SRM004)

1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

FS Regulatory Centre of Excellence, 2 December Hot Topic. Solvency II requirements published. 3. Provisional equivalence of third countries.

Association of British Insurers

FINAL DRAFT RTS UNDER ARTICLE 45(6) OF DIRECTIVE (EU) 2015/849 JC /12/2017. Final Report

An Introduction to Solvency II

Opinion on the solvency position of insurance and reinsurance undertakings in light of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union

Free and open International Insurance Markets

Position Paper. The Role of the Actuary in Solvency II: Managing Financial Risks

Undertaking-specific parameters (USPs)

Final report on public consultation No. 14/060 on the implementing. technical standards with regard to. standard deviations in relation to health risk

Single Resolution Mechanism

What do you know about Solvency II? High-level introduction for interested parties from Non-EU regions February 2013

Collateralized Banking

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of

Transcription:

Global Trends in Risk-based Supervision: MAPFRE s view Esteban Tejera First Vice-Chairman and General Manager, MAPFRE S.A. 9 th September 2014

1. MAPFRE: IAIG 2. LOOKING IN THE MIRROR 3. SUPERVISORY GOALS: OUR PERSPECTIVE 4. CONCLUSIONS 2

1. MAPFRE: IAIG 2. LOOKING IN THE MIRROR 3. SUPERVISORY GOALS: OUR PERSPECTIVE 4. CONCLUSIONS 3

1 MAPFRE: IAIG 4

1 MAPFRE: IAIG Brazil USA Spain Turkey Philippines Birth rate: 15.13 Birth rate: 12.6 Birth rate: 9.7 Birth rate: 17.135 Birth rate: 24.59 Mortality rate <5y:14.4 Mortality rate <5y: 7.1 Mortality rate <5y: 4.5 Mortality rate <5y:14.2 Mortality rate <5y:29.8 Inflation: 6.2% Inflation: 1.46% Inflation: 1.41% Inflation: 7.49% Inflation: 2.3% Unemployment: 6.9% Unemployment: 8.1% Unemployment: 25.2% Unemployment: 9.2% Unemployment: 7% Urban population: 84.87% Urban population: 82.625% Urban population: 77.57% Urban population: 72.33% Urban population: 49.12% Telephone lines: 22.3% Telephone lines: 44.41% Telephone lines: 41.87% Telephone lines: 18.73% Telephone lines: 4.07% Internet users: 49.85% Internet users: 81.03% Internet users: 72% Internet users: 45.13% Internet users: 36.24% Source: The World Bank Different markets, different clients and different needs SOLVENCY IS ONE OF OUR VALUES 5

1. MAPFRE: IAIG 2. LOOKING IN AT THE MIRROR 3. SUPERVISORY GOALS: OUR PERSPECTIVE 4. CONCLUSIONS 6

1. MAPFRE: IAIG 2. LOOKING IN THE MIRROR 2.1 What we see 2.2 What we should not see 3. SUPERVISORY GOALS: OUR PERSPECTIVE 4. CONCLUSIONS 7

2 LOOKING IN THE MIRROR What we see: Risk Managers Causal relationship between insurance and growth We manage a wide range of risks: Insurance risks: life/non-life; long-tail/short-tail; retail/industrial risks; insurance/reinsurance Financial risks: credit, equity, property, Other external risks: counterparty, operational risks We are able to adapt our products and management to the different economic frameworks and clients needs: E.g.: Inflationary markets in some South American countries and low yield environment in the EU Flexibility is key to adapt our business: build close customer relationships Promoting financial stability, inter alia, mobilizing savings: largest institutional long-term investors, easing Government, corporate and infrastructure funding Facilitating trade and commerce: credit and suretyship (origin of insurance) Managing risks more efficiently through accumulation. We take risks from retail and industrial business and facilitate entrepreneurship (covering risks from SMEs) In line with EC 2020 priority, we create and support smart, sustainable and inclusive growth 8

1. MAPFRE: IAIG 2. LOOKING IN THE MIRROR 2.1 What we see 2.2 What we should do not not see see 3. SUPERVISORY GOALS: OUR PERSPECTIVE 4. CONCLUSIONS 9

2 LOOKING IN THE MIRROR What we should not see: A bank Not all financial intermediaries businesses are equal. The variety of risks that insurers assume are broader and more diversified. We have more flexibility for adapting insurance products to our clients needs. Maturity transformation does not create instability. Liquidity risk is not material as we invest in liquid assets. Traditional insurance business is not systemic. Regulators Producers of burdensome information But still regulatory risk is the main risk. But we hire more people for our regulatory departments than for underwriting/claims. We should concentrate our efforts on our business in order to create sustainable growth. Long-term investments require a predictable framework. Changes in insurance regulatory frameworks do not help investing over the long term. But we have to prepare duplicated information that no one will read. 10

1. MAPFRE: IAIG 2. LOOKING IN THE MIRROR 3. SUPERVISORY GOALS: OUR PERSPECTIVE 4. CONCLUSIONS 11

1. MAPFRE: IAIG 2. LOOKING IN THE MIRROR 3. SUPERVISORY GOALS: OUR PERSPECTIVE 3.1 Pillar I 3.2 Pillar II 3.3 Pillar III 4. CONCLUSIONS 12

3 SUPERVISORY GOALS: OUR PERSPECTIVE Pillar I: Capital requirements Promote policyholder protection An adequate level of capital requirement is a trade-off between: The need to have appropriate hedges to face unexpected risks. Under Solvency I, the undertakings that went bust were well below 1 each 200. These failures were caused by running non-traditional insurance activities and lack of good management. Facilitate access to household and industrial protection. Excessive level of protection could jeopardize insurers role in creating sustainable growth and financial stability. Capital requirements should: Reflect risks held by the undertaking. Reflect how the undertaking is managed: risk mitigation techniques and management actions should be taken into account. Consider the business model in order to avoid unintended consequences on products: e.g. Long-Term Guarantees. Consider different environments in different countries. E.g. approaches to tackle low yield environments cannot be implemented in inflationary economies. Be carefully calibrated and tested in order to avoid market distortions. 13

3 SUPERVISORY GOALS: OUR PERSPECTIVE Pillar I: Capital requirements Avoid Applying the same solution for all financial service providers. Basel III does not fit for insurers: While banking risks are similar worldwide, this is not the case for insurance risks. Same capital requirements for different business models create wrong incentives and inefficiencies. The same capital requirements should be required to all participants in the market: Capital requirements should not penalize risks out of the European Economic Area: Catastrophe risk is over-calibrated. Different treatment depending on the legal form. Avoid shadow insurance. Distort business model. An example: Matching adjustment portfolios are not managed as if they were different undertakings, but draft delegated acts impose more requirements than ring-fenced funds: Own funds are not calculated separately. They only include assets and liabilities that are matched. There is no lack of transferability to absorb losses. Artificial creation of risk-fenced funds thwart good risk management. 14

1. MAPFRE: IAIG 2. LOOKING IN THE MIRROR 3. SUPERVISORY GOALS: OUR PERSPECTIVE 3.1 Pillar I 3.2 Pillar II 3.3 Pillar III 4. CONCLUSIONS 15

3 SUPERVISORY GOALS: OUR PERSPECTIVE Pillar II: System of Governance and Risk management Promote good risk management We promote good risk management as the best way to protect policyholders. Insurance failures are usually caused by bad governance practices. Not because insurers fail to fulfill capital requirements. We appreciate efforts and good work on Governance and enterprise risk management: Written policies including tasks, responsibilities and communication procedures Fit & Proper requirements Relevance of the three lines of defense ORSA Avoid Transforming risk management on a set of bureaucratic layers with excessive documentation requirements. Legal uncertainty and unlevelled playing field: Solvency II is a Maximum Harmonization Directive and Requirements are included in the Directive and delegated acts. Guidelines should not include new requirements (not even in the explanatory text). Supervisors should not ask for more requirements. Running ORSAs may be a very good risk management tool, but ORSAs should still be an OWN Assessment. Avoid that ORSAs become ERSAs (EIOPA Regulatory Solvency Assessment). Guidelines should not impose assessments. Otherwise they will not be used as a Risk Management tool. 16

1. MAPFRE: IAIG 2. LOOKING IN THE MIRROR 3. SUPERVISORY GOALS: OUR PERSPECTIVE 3.1 Pillar I 3.2 Pillar II 3.3 Pillar III 4. CONCLUSIONS 17

3 SUPERVISORY GOALS: OUR PERSPECTIVE Pillar II: System of Governance and Risk management Transparency We fully support transparency. We support clear and relevant information that facilitates decision-making to our stakeholders, including supervisors. Avoid Too much information is ineffective. Avoid duplication of information through different sources: Solvency II and IMD requirements should be aligned. Information for supervisors should also be relevant for supervisory needs. Avoid burdensome documentation and reports that no one will read. Some information should be available to the supervisors on demand instead of preparing it on a quarterly basis. National QRTs: Current guidelines are silent on how supervisors should collect QRTs. Development of different templates and formats in different countries hinders the correct functioning of the internal market by imposing barriers for entering into a market. All supervisors should ask for the same templates in the same format. 18

1. MAPFRE: IAIG 2. LOOKING IN THE MIRROR 3. SUPERVISORY GOALS: OUR PERSPECTIVE 4. CONCLUSIONS 19

4 CONCLUSIONS Insurers contribute to growth when they focus on their business Good regulation is not over-regulation: Draft Implementing Technical Standards: 146 pages. Draft Guidelines: 722 pages And this is only the first Set!!! 20

Thank you for your attention