Continuing Education Course #287 Engineering Methods in Microsoft Excel Part 2: Applied Optimization

Similar documents
Optimization Methods in Management Science

DUALITY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

Optimization Methods in Management Science

The Optimization Process: An example of portfolio optimization

Linear Programming: Sensitivity Analysis and Interpretation of Solution

Sensitivity Analysis with Data Tables. 10% annual interest now =$110 one year later. 10% annual interest now =$121 one year later


36106 Managerial Decision Modeling Sensitivity Analysis

OPTIMIZAÇÃO E DECISÃO 10/11

Graphical Sensitivity Analysis

The homework is due on Wednesday, September 7. Each questions is worth 0.8 points. No partial credits.

Sensitivity Analysis LINDO INPUT & RESULTS. Maximize 7X1 + 10X2. Subject to X1 < 500 X2 < 500 X1 + 2X2 < 960 5X1 + 6X2 < 3600 END

CSCI 1951-G Optimization Methods in Finance Part 00: Course Logistics Introduction to Finance Optimization Problems

Introduction to Operations Research

Mathematics for Management Science Notes 07 prepared by Professor Jenny Baglivo

Homework #2 Graphical LP s.

SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT. BF360 Operations Research

BINARY LINEAR PROGRAMMING AND SIMULATION FOR CAPITAL BUDGEETING

February 24, 2005

Session 3: Computational Game Theory

A Linear Programming Approach for Optimum Project Scheduling Taking Into Account Overhead Expenses and Tardiness Penalty Function

Developing Optimized Maintenance Work Programs for an Urban Roadway Network using Pavement Management System

DM559/DM545 Linear and integer programming

4. Introduction to Prescriptive Analytics. BIA 674 Supply Chain Analytics

CS360 Homework 14 Solution

Stochastic Programming: introduction and examples

INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF JAPAN Public Management and Policy Analysis Program Graduate School of International Relations

Optimization for Chemical Engineers, 4G3. Written midterm, 23 February 2015

Time and Cost Optimization Techniques in Construction Project Management

ENGG OPT TECHNIQUES Fall 2008 SOLVED EXAMPLES

TUTORIAL KIT OMEGA SEMESTER PROGRAMME: BANKING AND FINANCE

Lecture 10: The knapsack problem

The application of linear programming to management accounting

Tutorial 4 - Pigouvian Taxes and Pollution Permits II. Corrections

OPTIMIZATION METHODS IN FINANCE

FINANCIAL OPTIMIZATION

Integer Programming. Review Paper (Fall 2001) Muthiah Prabhakar Ponnambalam (University of Texas Austin)

COMM 290 MIDTERM REVIEW SESSION ANSWER KEY BY TONY CHEN

Getting Started with CGE Modeling

Online Shopping Intermediaries: The Strategic Design of Search Environments

36106 Managerial Decision Modeling Monte Carlo Simulation in Excel: Part IV

A Study of the Efficiency of Polish Foundries Using Data Envelopment Analysis

y > 2x! 4 0 > 2(0)! 4

MBA 7020 Sample Final Exam

An Introduction to Linear Programming (LP)

GAME THEORY. Game theory. The odds and evens game. Two person, zero sum game. Prototype example

PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION AND EXPECTED SHORTFALL MINIMIZATION FROM HISTORICAL DATA

DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A NETWORK-LEVEL PAVEMENT OPTIMIZATION MODEL FOR OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Stochastic Programming and Financial Analysis IE447. Midterm Review. Dr. Ted Ralphs

Lesson Topics. B.3 Integer Programming Review Questions

Comparative Study between Linear and Graphical Methods in Solving Optimization Problems

Linear Programming: Simplex Method

Efficient Portfolio and Introduction to Capital Market Line Benninga Chapter 9

Contents. Preface... Part I Single-Objective Optimization

Cost Estimation as a Linear Programming Problem ISPA/SCEA Annual Conference St. Louis, Missouri

Solving real-life portfolio problem using stochastic programming and Monte-Carlo techniques

Examinations for Semester II. / 2011 Semester I

Integer Programming Models

Lecture 3. Understanding the optimizer sensitivity report 4 Shadow (or dual) prices 4 Right hand side ranges 4 Objective coefficient ranges

MgtOp 470 Business Modeling with Spreadsheets Washington State University Sample Final Exam

The Impact of Basel Accords on the Lender's Profitability under Different Pricing Decisions

OPTIMIZATION OF BANKS LOAN PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT USING GOAL PROGRAMMING TECHNIQUE

GAME THEORY. (Hillier & Lieberman Introduction to Operations Research, 8 th edition)

$B$8 B&D

Master of Business Administration - General. Cohort: MBAG/14/PT Mar. Examinations for Semester II / 2014 Semester I

AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Advanced Operations Research Prof. G. Srinivasan Department of Management Studies Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Problem B.1, HR7E Solve the following LP graphically R. Saltzman

Optimal Security Liquidation Algorithms

The objectives of the producer

BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO GAME THEORY

Journal of College Teaching & Learning February 2007 Volume 4, Number 2 ABSTRACT

X 410 Business Applications of Calculus

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TIME-COST OPTIMIZATION

Risk-Return Optimization of the Bank Portfolio

Portfolio Optimization using Conditional Sharpe Ratio

How Much Competition is a Secondary Market? Online Appendixes (Not for Publication)

LP OPTIMUM FOUND AT STEP 2 OBJECTIVE FUNCTION VALUE

Sunset Company: Risk Analysis For Capital Budgeting Using Simulation And Binary Linear Programming Dennis F. Togo, University of New Mexico

Operation Research II

FORECASTING & BUDGETING

1. Introduction 2. Model Formulation 3. Solution Approach 4. Case Study and Findings 5. On-going Research

A MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING APPROACH TO ANALYZE THE ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING PRODUCT-MIX DECISION WITH CAPACITY EXPANSIONS

Lecture 2: Fundamentals of meanvariance

Appendix D: Constrained Optimization Modeling

Stochastic Programming for Financial Applications

Final Study Guide MATH 111

56:171 Operations Research Midterm Examination October 25, 1991 PART ONE

Advanced Operations Research Prof. G. Srinivasan Dept of Management Studies Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Principles of Managerial Finance Solution Lawrence J. Gitman CHAPTER 10. Risk and Refinements In Capital Budgeting

Chapter 2 Linear programming... 2 Chapter 3 Simplex... 4 Chapter 4 Sensitivity Analysis and duality... 5 Chapter 5 Network... 8 Chapter 6 Integer

AIRCURRENTS: PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION FOR REINSURERS

Business Mathematics (BK/IBA) Quantitative Research Methods I (EBE) Computer tutorial 4

True_ The Lagrangian method is one way to solve constrained maximization problems.

The Lagrangian method is one way to solve constrained maximization problems.

MS-E2114 Investment Science Exercise 4/2016, Solutions

Problem Set 2: Answers

FINANCE THEORY: Intertemporal. and Optimal Firm Investment Decisions. Eric Zivot Econ 422 Summer R.W.Parks/E. Zivot ECON 422:Fisher 1.

Golden-Section Search for Optimization in One Dimension

ASSET ALLOCATION WITH POWER-LOG UTILITY FUNCTIONS VS. MEAN-VARIANCE OPTIMIZATION

Transcription:

1 of 6 Continuing Education Course #287 Engineering Methods in Microsoft Excel Part 2: Applied Optimization 1. Which of the following is NOT an element of an optimization formulation? a. Objective function b. Constraints c. Mathematical programming d. Decision variables 2. In an optimization model, the main constraints are used to a. define the domains of the decision variables b. govern the interactions between the decision variables c. specify the relationships between the decision variables in the objective function 3. The purpose of classifying mathematical programs is to a. determine the tractability of the problem b. select a method that can be used to analyze and solve the problem c. improve the tractability of probabilistic models 4. An optimal solution is a. a feasible solution where the objective function reaches the optimal value. b. any real solution where the objective function reaches the optimal value c. the feasible solution computed as a closed-form solution only 5. The concept of improving search in solving optimization models involves a. using graphical methods to test points within the feasible region to identify the optimal solution b. starting the numerical search process at a feasible solution, testing neighboring solutions, and moving the search process in the direction that will lead to rapid convergence c. starting the numerical search process at some non-optimal solution, testing neighboring solutions, and moving the search process in the direction of the superior neighbors Use the following information and the supplied Excel file to work Question 6 through Question 25. Engineers Trust Bank of Florida has $40 million in capital, $300 million in checking account deposits, and $120 million in savings account deposits, that it wants to invest. Like any other bank, Engineers Trust Bank of Florida is seeking an investment plan that results in maximizing return on investment. The bank also wants to track the risk associated with any investment plan it adopts. The following products are available for the bank to invest in: Investment Product Return Rate (%) Liquid (Cash) Component (%) Risk (%) 1. Cash 0.0 100.0 5 2. Short Term Bonds 4.0 99.5 10 3. Government Bond 1 5 years 4.5 96.0 0 4. Government Bond 5 10 years 5.5 90.0 0 5. Government Bond over 10 years 7.0 85.0 0

2 of 6 6. Installment Loans 10.5 0.0 75 7. Mortgage Loans 8.5 0.0 60 8. Commercial Loans to small businesses 9.5 0.0 50 The following requirements must be followed: 1. The total investments in all products cannot exceed the total of the capital and deposits amounts. 2. At least 5% of the funds should be invested in each of the eight products, for diversification of the portfolio. 3. At least 30% of funds should be invested in commercial loans to small businesses, to maintain the banks small business friendly status. 4. For the risk, the bank stands to lose the specified percentage of the money it invests in that product. 5. Federal regulations require that a reserve of at least 14% of the checking account deposits plus 4% of the savings account deposits be maintained at all times. 6. Federal regulations require that the total of the liquid components of the investments be at least 47% of the checking account deposits plus 36% of the savings account deposits Let x1 denote the amount ($) invested in product #1. Let x2 denote the amount ($) invested in product #2. : : Let x8 denote the amount ($) invested in product #8. The standard form of this optimization model is as follows. Objective function: maximize 0.0 x1 +0.04 x2 +0.045 x3 +0.055 x4 +0.07 x5 +0.105 x6 +0.085 x7 +0.095 x8 [return on investment] Subject to: x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 460,000,000 [total investment] 0.95x1-0.05x2-0.05x3-0.05x4-0.05x5-0.05x6-0.05x7-0.05x8 0 [diversification for product #1] -0.05x1 + 0.95x2-0.05x3-0.05x4-0.05x5-0.05x6-0.05x7-0.05x8 0 [diversification for product #2] -0.05x1-0.05x2 + 0.95x3-0.05x4-0.05x5-0.05x6-0.05x7-0.05x8 0 [diversification for product #3] - 0.05x1-0.05x2-0.05x3 + 0.95x4-0.05x5-0.05x6-0.05x7-0.05x8 0 [diversification for product #4] -0.05x1-0.05x2-0.05x3-0.05x4 + 0.95x5-0.05x6-0.05x7-0.05x8 0 [diversification for product #5]

3 of 6-0.05x1-0.05x2-0.05x3-0.05x4-0.05x5 + 0.95x6-0.05x7-0.05x8 0 [diversification for product #6] -0.05x1-0.05x2-0.05x3-0.05x4-0.05x5-0.05x6 + 0.95x7-0.05x8 0 [diversification for product #7] -0.05x1-0.05x2-0.05x3-0.05x4-0.05x5-0.05x6-0.05x7 + 0.95x8 0 [diversification for product #8] -0.3x1-0.3x2-0.3x3-0.3x4-0.3x5-0.3x6-0.3x7 + 0.7x8 0 [small business loans] x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 413,200,000 [required reserve per Fed regulation] 1.0x1 + 0.995x2 + 0.96x3 + 0.9x4 + 0.85x5 184,200,000 [liquid components per Fed regulation] x1 0 [variable-type 1] x2 0 [variable-type 2] x3 0 [variable-type 3] x4 0 [variable-type 4] x5 0 [variable-type 5] x6 0 [variable-type 6] x7 0 [variable-type 7] x8 0 [variable-type 8] The risk associated with the investment plan is 0.05x1 + 0.1x2 + 0.75x6 + 0.6x7 + 0.5x8 [risk] Open the Excel file supplied with the test and review the implementation of the investment plan on the spreadsheet and in Excel Solver. Please do not change any of the data entries unless specifically instructed to do so. Set the decision variables and the objective function. Set the solving method to Simplex LP. Run the model. 6. The optimal total investment for maximization of returns is a. $102,346,705 b. $124,674,970 c. $413,200,000 7. The optimal return on investment is a. $31,643,165

4 of 6 b. $124,674,970 c. $413,200,000 8. The total risk associated with the optimal investment plan is a. $123,006,705 b. $123,960,000 c. 124,674,970 9. The optimal investment amounts for product 1 and product 5 are a. $20,660,000 and $31,643,165 respectively b. $20,660,000 and $123,006,705 respectively c. $20,660,000 and $20,660,000 respectively Increase the capital to $100,000,000. 10. There is an increase in the optimum return on investment. 11. The optimal total investment for maximization of returns is now a. $413,200,000 b. $473,200,000 c. $460,000,000 12. The total risk associated with the optimal investment plan is now a. $166,379,382 b. $413,200,000 c. $520,000,000 13. The optimal investment amounts for product 4 and product 8 are now a. $23,660,000 and $37,339,371 respectively b. $23,660,000 and $141,960,000 respectively c. $23,660,000 and $23,660,000 respectively Reduce the capital to $40,000,000. Increase the checking account deposits to $400,000,000. 14. The optimal total investment for maximization of returns is now a. $499,200,000 b. $560,000,000 c. $682,000,000 15. The optimal return on investment is now a. $31,643,165 b. $33,011,579 c. $37,872,432 16. The total risk associated with the optimal investment plan is now a. $222,569,558 b. $142,980,705 c. $124,674,890 17. The optimal investment amounts for product 3 and product 5 are now a. $24,960,000 and $158,799,058 respectively b. $24,960,000 and $149,760,000 respectively

5 of 6 c. $158,799,058 and $149,760,000 respectively Reduce the checking account deposits to $300,000,000. Increase the savings account deposits to $200,000,000. 18. The optimal total investment for maximization of returns is now a. 540,000,000 b. 490,000,000 c. 152,644,852 19. The optimal return on investment is now a. 24,500,000 b. 37,748,426 c. 81,026,470 20. The total risk associated with the optimal investment plan is now a. 152,644,852 b. 142,980,705 c. 124,674,890 21. The optimal investment amounts for product 6 and product 7 are now a. 81,026,470 and 147,000,000 respectively b. 24,500,000 and 147,000,000 respectively c. 81,026,470 and 24,500,000 respectively Reduce the savings account deposits to $120,000,000. Rerun the model, and note the maximum return on investment. Change the objective function to maximize risk. 22. Maximizing the risk resulted in an increase in the return on investment Change the objective function to maximize return on investment. Rerun the model, and note the optimal return on investment. Change the objective function to minimize risk. 23. The optimal total investment for risk minimization is now a. 322,450,765 b. 460,000,000 c. 520,000,000 24. The return on investment under risk minimization is now a. 37,872,432 b. 31,643,165 c. 20,717,461 25. The total risk associated with risk minimization plan is now a. 72,551,422 b. 124,674,890 c. 142,980,705 26. The optimal investment amounts for product 6 and product 8 are now a. 128,980,306 and 96,735,229 respectively

6 of 6 b. 16,122,538 and 128,980,306 respectively c. 16,122,538 and 96,735,229 respectively 27. Sensitivity analysis is a. required in all optimization studies b. strongly recommended for most optimization studies c. only relevant based on the solving method used. 28. The solving method selected in Excel Solver a. should be selected based on the classification of the optimization model b. should be selected based on the number of reports the user would like to produce c. is not important, as all solution methods use improving search algorithms 29. Excel Solver cannot solve nonlinear optimization models 30. There are no limits on the size of the optimization model that can be implemented in Excel Solver.