Ninth ARTNeT Capacity Building Workshop for Trade Research "Trade Flows and Trade Policy Analysis"

Similar documents
Theoretical Tools of Public Finance. 131 Undergraduate Public Economics Emmanuel Saez UC Berkeley

Intermediate Microeconomics

Partial Equilibrium Model: An Example. ARTNet Capacity Building Workshop for Trade Research Phnom Penh, Cambodia 2-6 June 2008

Chapter 9. The Instruments of Trade Policy

Economics 11: Solutions to Practice Final

Tariffs in a large economy

Simon Fraser University Department of Economics. Econ342: International Trade. Final Examination. Instructor: N. Schmitt

Application: The Costs of Taxation

PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM Welfare Analysis

Competitive Markets. Market supply Competitive equilibrium Total surplus and efficiency Taxes and subsidies Price maintenance Application: Imports

Economics 101 Fall 2018 Answers to Homework #3 Due Thursday, November 8, 2018

Consumers cannot afford all the goods and services they desire. Consumers are limited by their income and the prices of goods.

Consumer s Surplus. Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 Spring 2009

Market demand is therefore given by the following equation:

Tariffs in a small economy

2007 Thomson South-Western

14 (Tariffs, partial equilibrium analysis of tariff, effect on producer and consumer surplus, cost and benefits of tariff)

Application: The Costs of Taxation

Chapter 21. The Monetary Policy and Aggregate Demand Curves

International Trade Lecture 23: Trade Policy Theory (I)

ECO 352 International Trade Spring Term 2010 Week 3 Precepts February 15 Introduction, and The Exchange Model Questions

International Trade

Lecture 8. Application: the cost of taxation

Overview Basic analysis Strategic trade policy Further topics. Overview

Trading Company and Indirect Exports

14.54 International Trade Lecture 20: Trade Policy (I)

3. Trade and Development

EconS Micro Theory I 1 Recitation #7 - Competitive Markets

TAXES, TRANSFERS, AND LABOR SUPPLY. Henrik Jacobsen Kleven London School of Economics. Lecture Notes for PhD Public Finance (EC426): Lent Term 2012

International Trade in Resource Goods and Returns to Labor in the Non-Resource Sectors

The Neoclassical Growth Model

How Costly is Protection? Based primarily on Feenstra s (1992) article, but also Feenstra (2004) and Gary Hufbauer s online paper

AGEC 429: AGRICULTURAL POLICY LECTURE 10: GENERAL POLICY INSTRUMENTS I

Problem Set 7 - Answers. Topics in Trade Policy

where Qs is the quantity supplied, Qd is the quantity demanded, and P is the price.

ECONS 301 Homework #1. Answer Key

Unit 6: Government policy in competitive markets II Distribution & incidence

Answers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average)

14.03 Fall 2004 Problem Set 3 Solutions

ANSWERS FINAL 342 VERSION 1

Taxes: Equity vs. Efficiency Part I The only difference between death and taxes is that death doesn't get worse every time Congress meets.

Application of Welfare Analysis: The Costs of Taxation

On the Political Substitutability between Tariffs and Subsidies a

1. Consider a small country (Thailand) with the following demand and supply curves for steel:

Final Exam - Solutions

Economics 111 Exam 1 Spring 2008 Prof Montgomery. Answer all questions. Explanations can be brief. 100 points possible.

9. Real business cycles in a two period economy

1. Suppose the demand and supply curves for goose-down winter jackets in 2014 were as given below:

Public Economics Taxation I: Incidence and E ciency Costs

Macro II. John Hassler. Spring John Hassler () New Keynesian Model:1 04/17 1 / 10

Suppose that the government in this economy decides to impose an excise tax of $80 per clock on producers of clocks.

Macroeconomics and finance

Microeconomic Analysis PROBLEM SET 6

Answers to Questions: Chapter 7

Perloff (2014, 3e, GE), Section

Problem Set 1: Trade Barriers under Perfect Competition - Answer Key

Chapter 16: Equilibrium

International Economics International Trade (Industrial and Commercial policies lecture 7)

Monetary Macroeconomics Lecture 5. Mark Hayes

Module 10. Lecture 37

Economics II - Exercise Session # 3, October 8, Suggested Solution

Any book of Microeconomics can be useful: Microeconomics and Behavior, R. H. Frank Microeconomic Analysis (H. Varian) 2/22/2016 1

Problem Set 1: Trade Barriers under Perfect Competition - Answer Key

Aggregation with a double non-convex labor supply decision: indivisible private- and public-sector hours

PBAF 516 YA Prof. Mark Long Practice Midterm Questions

p 1 _ x 1 (p 1 _, p 2, I ) x 1 X 1 X 2

The Heckscher-Ohlin model

Intermediate microeconomics. Lecture 3: Production theory. Varian, chapters 19-24

Lecture 12: Taxes. Session ID: DDEE. EC101 DD & EE / Manove Taxes & International Trade p 1. EC101 DD & EE / Manove Clicker Question p 2

Economics 230a, Fall 2017 Lecture Note 6: Basic Tax Incidence

Public Affairs 856 Trade, Competition, and Governance in a Global Economy Lecture 12 3/5/2018. Instructor: Prof. Menzie Chinn UW Madison Spring 2018

Topic 6: Optimal Monetary Policy and International Policy Coordination

ECON 311 Winter Quarter, 2010 NAME: KEY Prof. Hamilton

Economics 111 Exam 1 Fall 2005 Prof Montgomery

Economics 230a, Fall 2014 Lecture Note 7: Externalities, the Marginal Cost of Public Funds, and Imperfect Competition

1 Supply and Demand. 1.1 Demand. Price. Quantity. These notes essentially correspond to chapter 2 of the text.

Arindam Das Gupta Independent. Abstract

Economics 101 Fall 2010 Homework #3 Due 10/26/10

LABOR SUPPLY RESPONSES TO TAXES AND TRANSFERS: PART I (BASIC APPROACHES) Henrik Jacobsen Kleven London School of Economics

MACROECONOMICS - CLUTCH CH. 6 - INTRODUCTION TO TAXES.

Soojae Moon Fall 2009 <Oct. 6>

Final Exam December 18, 2012 Answers

Economics 111 Exam 1 Prof Montgomery Spring 2009

Week 5. Remainder of chapter 9: the complete real model Chapter 10: money Copyright 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE. Xie, Yiqing

Solutions to Assignment #2

EconS 301 Intermediate Microeconomics Review Session #4

3. The Deadweight Loss of Taxation

Chapter 3 Introduction to the General Equilibrium and to Welfare Economics

Multiproduct-Firm Oligopoly: An Aggregative Games Approach

Partial privatization as a source of trade gains

PREFERENTIAL TRADE AREAS

ECON-140 Midterm 2 Spring, 2011

ECON/MGMT 115. Industrial Organization

In Jormungand, Koko Hekmatyar is an arms dealer. Suppose she faces the market for Javelin ATGM missiles, and the demand is given by Px = 10,000-2Qx.

Lecture 2: The Neoclassical Growth Model

PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM Welfare Analysis. Welfare Analysis. Pareto Efficiency. [See Chap 12]

GSID, Nagoya University, January The Gains from Trade, Protection, National Welfare and Trading Arrangements

Midterm Exam #2 - Answers. March 27, 1997

MIT PhD International Trade Lecture 5: The Ricardo-Viner and Heckscher-Ohlin Models (Theory I)

Transcription:

Ninth ARTNeT Capacity Building Workshop for Trade Research "Trade Flows and Trade Policy Analysis" June 2013 Bangkok, Thailand Cosimo Beverelli and Rainer Lanz (World Trade Organization) 1

Partial-equilibrium (PE) trade policy analysis and simulation 2

Content a. Market access analysis with PE modelling b. Basic PE model for analyzing welfare changes c. Empirical tool for trade policy simulations: SMART 3

a. Market access analysis with PE modelling Rationale for market access analysis Rationale for PE modelling Advantages Disadvantages 4

b. Basic PE model for analyzing welfare changes Derivation of social welfare function Perfect competition Small open economy (SOE) Large country 5

Social welfare Each consumer h has quasi-linear utility function c 0 h + U h c h Budget constraint: c 0 h + p c h I h FOC: 1 = λ and U = λp = p (demand for non-numeraire goods is independent of income) Demand functions are c h = d h p and c 0 h = I h p d h p Welfare is defined as the sum of individual indirect utilities V h : Notice that: H W p, I V h h=1 H h=1 I h = I (total income) W I H H = I h p d h p + U h d h p h=1 W = 1 and (by envelope theorem) H = p h=1 dh p d p h=1 p d h p + U h d h p = CS (consumer surplus) 6

Social welfare (ct d) To simplify, let there be only one good subject to specific tariff t World price is p and p = p + t Numeraire good is freely traded at fixed world price of unity Labor is the only factor of production. Each unit of numeraire requires one unit of labor Therefore, w = 1 and WL = L Output of the good subject to the tariff is y. Produced by firms with cost function C y and marginal costs C y Imports m = d p y, with d p < 0 Tariff revenue tm is redistributed to consumers Consumers are also entitled to profits from import-competing industry Under perfect competition, py C y = PS (producer surplus) Under imperfect competition, py C y = π (industry profits) Social welfare is then: W p, I = W p, L + tm + py C y W t 7

Social welfare (ct d) How does social welfare vary with the tariff? dw = W p d p + W I =1 di dw = d p + d L + tm + py C y dw = d p + m + tdm + pdy + y C y dy dw = d p + m + t dm + y + p C y dy dw = t dm m + p C y dy (1) 8

Perfect competition, SOE Perfect competition implies that p = C y SOE assumption implies that = 0, therefore = (there is full pass-through of the tariff to domestic price) Equation 1 simplifies to: dw = t dm Since dw t=0 = 0, the optimal tariff for a SOE is zero 9

Welfare loss from a tariff (SOE) Taking a second-order Taylor series approximation of welfare: W t W 0 + t dw t=0 + 1 2 t2 d2 W 2 t=0 W t W 0 0 + 1 2 t2 dm < 0 This is the deadweight loss (DWL). It can also be expressed as fraction of import expenditure pm: W t W 0 pm 1 2 t p 2 dm p m IDE E.g. with a 10% tariff and import demand elasticity (IDE) of 2, DWL (relative to import expenditure) is 1% 10

Perfect competition, SOE: graphical representation No-trade equilibrium Price S Price Home price rises by the amount of the tariff. Home supply increases and Home demand decreases Imports fall from M 1 to M 2 p * +t X+t p * a b c d c b+d Export supply, X D M S 1 S 1 S 2 D 2 D 1 (a) Home market M 2 Quantity M 1 Imports (b) Foreign market CS loss = -(a+b+c+d) PS gain = +a Tariff revenues = c DWL = b+d (also shown as triangle under import demand curve) 11

Perfect competition, large country Large country assumption implies that 0, therefore 1 < 0 (intuitively, if a large country imposes a tariff it reduces its imports sufficiently to drive down the world price < 1 (intuitively, the pass-through of the tariff is not full, and foreign exporters absorb part of the tariff in the form of lower world price ( < 0) Equation 1 becomes: dw = t dm = m (2) Therefore: dw t=0 = m > 0 A small enough tariff will necessarily raise welfare for a large country What does large mean? 12

Optimal tariff for large country Large "means that the export supply is upward sloping (i.e. elasticity of export supply is finite vs. SOE case in which export supply is horizontal, i.e. infinitely elastic) Optimal tariff t opt for such large country is computed where 2 equals 0: dw = 0 topt p = m dm 1 (3) Since domestic imports m = foreign exports x, dm = dx. Therefore: t opt p = dx p x XSE 1 Optimal % tariff is equal to the inverse of the export supply elasticity (XSE) 4 13

Optimal tariff for large country (ct d) Alternatively, equation 4 can be re-arranged to yield: t opt p = dm IDE p m 1 Optimal % tariff is larger: the smaller the pass-through the larger the terms-of-trade (TOT) gain 14

Optimal tariff for large country: graphical representation (a) Home market (b) Foreign market Price No-trade equilibrium Price X+t S P*+t p 0 p* a b A e c d D e c C C* b+d B* t X M S 1 S 2 D 2 D 1 Quantity M 2 M 1 Imports The increase in the domestic price is less than the tariff ( < 1) Foreign exporters absorb part of the tariff ( < 0): area e = TOT gain If the gain of e is greater than the DWL loss (b+d), Home gains 15

Empirical evidence Broda et al. (2008) find that prior to WTO membership, countries set import tariffs 9 percentage points higher on inelastically supplied imports relative to those supplied elastically See bonus exercise for a replication of their results See also the R. Feenstra, Advanced International Trade (Princeton, 2004), Chapter 7, Section Tariffs on Japanese Trucks and Motorcycles (pp. 233-240). 16

c. Empirical tool for trade policy simulations: SMART Chapter 4 of the Practical Guide to TPA discusses various empirical tools Here we use SMART (built-in in WITS) SMART Overview Theoretical underpinnings Export supply side Demand side Effects of policy changes Trade effects Effects on Tariff Revenue, Consumer Surplus and Welfare More details and formulas in Jammes and Olarreaga (2005) 17

SMART example: Albania s unilateral trade liberalization with the EU In 2007, Albania sourced buses (HS 870210) from 19 trading partners, of which 11 were European Union countries Albania levied tariffs from all sources, including the EU Using SMART, the user can simulate the effect of a full trade liberalization towards the EU, but not to the rest of the world SMART yields the results that all 11 EU countries would be able to increase their exports to Albania, for example Germany, the biggest exporter, by almost 1 million USD Non-EU countries, by contrast, would see their shares shrink, in particular the US, by about 0.3 million USD SMART results indicate that the tariff liberalization would: Increase imports Lower tariff revenues Raise consumer surplus (Albania is a SOE) Results in this folder 18