MEMORANDUM. Mr. George Roberts, Red Table Ventures, LLC Mr. Tambi Katieb, Land Planning Collaborative, Inc.

Similar documents
Thompson & Trautz LLC. Ever Vail Fiscal Impact Report

FINAL PROJECT PLAN TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT FOR RED ROCK WATER RESERVOIR CITY OF RAPID CITY. Prepared by the

UERWA 2018 Rates. Outdoor Usage

Tri-City Raceway Site Assessment

Fiscal Impact Analysis

City of Denton, Texas

bae urban economics Memorandum Fee Analysis for General Plan Update Cost Recovery and for General Plan Implementation

Project Information Form. Date of Submission: Zoning District: Tax Map # (s): Project Size (Acres): City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip:

Fiscal Analysis November 14, Fiscal Analysis Fiscal Conditions Project Background

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT:

Infrastructure Financing Plan. Infrastructure Financing District No. 1 (Rincon Hill Area) DRAFT

Greenland LA Metropolis Hotel Development LLC., a Delaware corporation (Developer).

WHEREAS, the proposed budget has been submitted to the Board of Directors of the District for its consideration; and

WHEREAS, the proposed budget has been submitted to the Board of Directors of the District for its consideration; and

1.0 FISCAL BENEFITS OF PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN

Eagle River Water and Sanitation District Vail, Colorado. Financial Statements December 31, 2013

City of Farmersville, Texas

ECONOMIC ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES PAPER

Town of Boothbay Harbor Planning Board SUGGESTED AGENDA Wednesday, September 26, :00 PM Boothbay Harbor Town Hall 11 Howard St.

Westwood Country Club Redevelopment

LAKE DON PEDRO COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Policy and Procedures Manual

The Economic Capture of the Downtown Phoenix Redevelopment Area. Prepared for:

TOWN OF WOODWAY FEE SCHEDULE PAGE 1 EFFECTIVE APRIL 18, 2017

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY

River Edge Fiscal Impact Analysis

Eagle River Water and Sanitation District Vail, Colorado. Financial Statements December 31, 2014

D R A F T M E M O R A N D U M

MEMORANDUM. Date: July 28, 2011; amended August 31, 2011

2017 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY. HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d

Proposed Symphony Park TID. January 20, 2015

3 COMMERCIAL PARCELS AVAILABLE ACRES (DIVISIBLE) HASTINGS CROSSROADS Hastings, MN 55033

Section 94 Development Contributions Plan

TAUSSIG. & Associates, Inc. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS DELTA COVE (ATLAS TRACT) DAVID. Public Finance Facilities Planning Urban Economics

Town of Prescott Valley 2014 Development Impact Fee Report. Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc.

2013 Mill Rates and Property Taxes

HACKBERRY HIDDEN COVE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN (UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS)

sources for FY , only a portion of the statedistributed revenue would be available for new capital projects.

Re: Lanterns Fiscal Impact Analysis. Background. Analysis Process. June 7, Mr. Scott Carlson Carlson Land PO Box 247 East Lake CO 80614

TOWN OF BERTHOUD SCHEDULE OF RATES, CHARGES AND FEES 2018

Peer Community Comparison of Revenues, Budgets and Services and Assessment of Real Estate Transfer Tax Impacts

CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC MEMPHREMAGOG RCM MUNICIPALITY OF STANSTEAD TOWNSHIP

Big Chino Water Ranch Project Impact Analysis Prescott & Prescott Valley, Arizona

APPLICATION FOR DEMOLITION PERMIT

HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d.

Loudoun 2040 Fiscal Impact Analysis Report Loudoun County, Virginia

M A N I T O B A ) Order No. 13/13 ) THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT ) February 4, 2013

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL POLICY

A-2 Assembly, nightclubs

Exhibit "B" TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE, NUMBER ONE CITY OF BAYTOWN. July 8, 2015

HOLLAND CREEK METROPOLITAN DISTRICT

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO No

CITY OF ATHENS, TENNESSEE APPLICATION FOR BEER PERMIT

Residential Permits R-2, R-3, R-4, and U Occupancies 2018 Building Permit Valuation/Fee Schedule

Town of Southwest Ranches, FL

Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority Vail, Colorado. Financial Statements December 31, 2011 and 2010

SECOND AMENDED MASTER DEED OF SANDSTONE RIDGE CONDOMINIUMS HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION

Residential Permit Fee Schedule

CRESTVIEW WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2014

Lakeside Village Town of Flower Mound, Texas

City of New Smyrna Beach Permit Fee Schedule

Businesses Located in LFP $40.00 Businesses Located Outside LFP $80.00 Secondhand Dealers located in LFP $70.00

2. Address of the head office: (Please give Street Address not P.O. Box) (City) (County) (State) (Zip Code)

Q & A: HOW PROPERTY TAXES ARE DETERMINED

Q & A: HOW PROPERTY TAXES ARE DETERMINED

Bonds & TIFs. SDML Finance Officer s School Bonds. Presented by: Tom Grimmond Ray Woody Woodsend Senior Vice President Senior Vice President

City of Keizer Fees and Charges for Services As of July 2017

CITY OF JENKS COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT P.O. Box N. Elm Jenks, OK 74037(918)

San Francisco Multi-Purpose Venue Project. Fiscal Impact Analysis: Revenues. Draft Report. Prepared for: The City and County of San Francisco

Title 6 WATER AND SEWER FEES AND CHARGES

SAWS Guide to Development 2008 revision B

Schedule of Fees & Escrow Charges

Balanced Financial Plan Projected Changes and Assumptions

Item # Item # 11-D AGENDA MEMORANDUM

PWC SCHEDULE OF DEPOSITS, FEES AND CHARGES. Table of Contents

Eagle River Water & Sanitation District, Colorado; General Obligation

BELLYACHE RIDGE METROPOLITAN DISTRICT

Schedule A Page 1 of 8

Attachment 18. KMA Comparative General Fund

Agenda Title: Amendments to Article IX of the 2003 Land Use Code Oil and Gas Drilling and Production

Second Quarter Financial Statements

The Economic and Fiscal Impact of Lowe s Located in Silverthorne, Colorado. Prepared for:

Fiscal Impact Analysis

Fiscal Annexation Analysis. FINAL REPORT: January 14, 2009

227 West Trade Street Phone Suite 1400 Fax Charlotte, NC 28202

New Construction and additions require verification of setbacks by a Massachusetts Registered Land Surveyor (RPLS).

Report to: General Committee Meeting Date: December 5, 2017

CITY OF BEACON, NEW YORK FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015

BUILDING PERMIT-GENERAL INFORMATION

Memorandum. Background memorandum for Independence/Constitution Project fiscal impact analysis

Arrowhead Metropolitan District

Chapter CONCURRENCY

Q & A: HOW PROPERTY TAXES ARE DETERMINED

TAUSSIG. Public Finance Public Private Partnerships Urban Economics. Newport Beach Riverside San Francisco Dallas ASSOCIATES, $

Town of Braselton Occupational Tax Certificate Application NEW: Return original copy before commencing operations

FORT COLLINS- LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT

Municipal Study City of Greater Sudbury Comparison to Northern Municipalities

ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS OF TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT AT GOLD LINE FOOTHILL EXTENSION PASADENA STATIONS

Brunswick Crossing Special Taxing District City of Brunswick, Maryland

Municipal Study City of Greater Sudbury Comparison to Northern Municipalities

Economic Impact of the Proposed General Plan Update

Transcription:

Stan Bernstein and Associates, Inc. Financial Planners and Consultants For Local Governments, Municipal Bond Underwriters, and Real Estate Developers PO Box 5342 Vail, Colorado 81658 970-390-9162 amy.bernstein.greer@gmail.com MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Mr. George Roberts, Red Table Ventures, LLC Mr. Tambi Katieb, Land Planning Collaborative, Inc. Amy Greer DATE: SUBJECT: Analysis of Potential Incremental Town of Gypsum Revenues Generated as a result of the Siena Lake PUD - Draft #3 In accordance with your request Stan Bernstein and Associates, Inc. has developed this ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL INCREMENTAL TOWN OF GYPSUM REVENUES GENERATED AS A RESULT OF THE SIENA LAKE PUD (the Fiscal Impact Analysis ). SIENA LAKE PUD The Fiscal Impact Analysis is based upon the following proposed Siena Lake buildout: Planned # of Units/Commercial Sq. Ft. Residential Mountain Cottage 227 Lake Home 176 Condo 156 Live Work Condo 32 Commercial Retail Cottage 7,425 Live Work Retail 37,800 Live Work Office 37,800 Storage 20,850 Warehouse 26,000 Hotel (100 rooms) 32,200 Community Center (fitness, pool, meeting) 9,000 Clubhouse Restaurant 2,000 Clubhouse (fitness, common space) 12,000

Page 2 of 5 The fiscal impact analysis is based on a total of 591 residential units and 185,075 square feet of commercial space. It is expected that buildout will occur over a six year period beginning in 2019 and be complete by the end of 2024. Based on this schedule of buildout, the entire development will generate an aggregate non-inflated value of approximately $259.6 million as set forth on Schedule 1. Based upon an average occupancy of 1.8 persons per home it is projected that Siena Lake will generate approximately 1,064 full-time equivalent incremental residents at full-buildout. INCREMENTAL TOWN OF GYPSUM REVENUES BY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTING FUNDS The following table summarize the forecasted non-inflated incremental Town of Gypsum revenues by individual accounting funds. Annual @ One Time Stabilization General Fund Revenues $656,821 Use Tax $3,129,345 RETT Revenues; Initial Sales $2,299,700 Comm Dev Revs; bldg, elec, mech, plumb permits $797,631 Conservation Trust Fund $7,742 Water Fund Tap Fees $3,731,075 User Fees $303,486 Sewer Fund Tap Fees $4,352,921 User Fees $205,955 Sanitation Fund User Fees $190,137 APPROACH, METHODOLOGY AND UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS Stan Bernstein and Associates, Inc. believes that the most understandable way to assess the Siena Lake revenue impacts to the Town of Gypsum is to identify the incremental revenue impacts to the General Fund, Conservation Trust Fund, Water Fund, Sewer Fund, and Sanitation Fund. Incremental Fire Impact Fee revenues have also been identified as well as projected tax revenues for overlapping taxing entities. The incremental revenue and expenditure impacts have been identified for the years ending December 31, 2017 through 2031.

Page 3 of 5 Incremental Town of Gypsum Assessed Valuation Incremental assessed valuation as a result of the Siena Lake PUD is projected to increase from approximately $313,350 in 2017 to approximately $25.15 million for tax collection year 2026 as set forth on Schedule 1. Assessed valuation is expected to increase as a result of the sale and platting of lots and from the completion of residential and commercial product. Assessed valuation forecasts do not include the impacts of inflation and assume that vacant platted lots will be assessed at 29% of 75% of market value and completed living units will be assessed at 7.2% of market value. Incremental Town of Gypsum Property Tax Revenues Incremental Town of Gypsum property tax revenues from the Siena Lake PUD are forecasted to increase from $1,596 for tax collection year 2017 to $128,132 by tax collection year 2026 as presented on Exhibit I. This assumes that the Town of Gypsum General Fund mill levy remains 5.094. Incremental Town of Gypsum Sales and Use Tax Revenues Non-inflated incremental Town of Gypsum 3% sales tax revenues from the Siena Lake PUD are forecasted to increase from $42,676 for tax collection year 2020 to $296,722 by tax collection year 2025 as presented on Schedule 2. The sales tax revenue forecasts assume that an average of 1.8 persons will occupy each completed living unit (per The Developer). It is assumed that 80% of residential living units will be occupied for a full-year, 17% of residential living units will be occupied for a half-year, and 3% will be occupied for an average of 30-days each year. It is assumed that each full-year equivalent household will generate incremental sales-taxable expenditures averaging $18,857 annually. This level of expenditure was calculated by dividing the year 2017 budgeted taxable sales ($158.33 million) by the number of Town of Gypsum households (2,519 per Town officials) which results in an average taxable expenditure per capita of $62,856. This number is then factored by 30% to compensate for expenditures incurred by non-gypsum related I-70 travelers. Non-inflated 3% Town of Gypsum construction materials use tax revenues from the Siena Lake PUD are projected to generate approximately $3.13 million during 2017 through 2024. The construction materials use tax revenue forecasts assume that the average non-inflated construction value of an average home is $353,000 and that 50% of such costs will be for construction materials. Incremental Town of Gypsum General Fund Other Revenues Non-inflated incremental Town of Gypsum General Fund revenues (i.e., other than sales or property tax revenues) have been forecasted for each General Fund revenue source based upon a revenue generation per household approach. This approach assumes that each incremental household will generate the same amount of incremental revenues to the Town of Gypsum's General Fund that are currently being generated for each household within the boundaries of the Town of Gypsum. For financial planning

Page 4 of 5 purposes it is assumed that there are approximately 2,519 households currently within the Town of Gypsum. These incremental forecasted General Fund revenues are presented on Exhibit I. Community Development Revenues including building permit, electrical permit, mechanical permit, and plumbing permit fees have been calculated based on the Town s current fee schedule and 2017 Budget. Community Development Revenues are projected to generate approximately $798,000 during the development period. Incremental Town of Gypsum Water, Sewer, Sanitation Revenues Incremental Water Tap Fee revenues of $3.73 million have been forecasted based upon the current tap fee rate of $6,000 per SFE (single family equivalent) and are uninflated. Water User Fee revenues are based upon the current average monthly water rate of $40.67 per SFE and are forecast to generate approximately $303,000 annually at full-buildout on a non-inflated basis. Incremental Sewer Tap Fee revenues are based upon the current sewer tap fee rate of $7,000 per SFE and are forecasted to generate a total of $4.35 million (uninflated). Sewer User Fee revenues are based upon the current average monthly rate per SFE of $27.60 and are forecasted to generate approximately $206,000 annually at full-buildout on a non-inflated basis. Incremental Sanitation User Fee revenues are based upon the current average monthly rate of $18.83 and a reduced senior rate of $7.98 and are forecasted to generate approximately $190,000 annually at full-buildout on a non-inflated basis. Incremental Fire Impact Fee Revenues Incremental Fire Impact Fee revenues are based upon current one-time impact fee rates of $1,094.90 per dwelling unit and $547.45 per 1,000 square feet of commercial. Fire Impact Fee revenues are forecasted to total $748,405 during the analysis period. Incremental RETT Revenues. Based on a 1% RETT, approximately $2.3 million in RETT revenue from initial sales is estimated during years 2019-2024. RETT revenue from secondary sales are estimated at $160,979 on an annual basis at stabilization (year 2028) with an assumed 7% average turnover per year. LIMITING FACTORS The assumptions disclosed in the Fiscal Impact Analysis are those of the Developer and have not been independently reviewed by Stan Bernstein and Associates, Inc. Those assumptions identified are believed to be the significant factors in determining financial feasibility; however, they are likely not to be all-inclusive. There will usually be differences between forecasted and actual results, because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as expected, and those differences may be

Page 5 of 5 material. Key assumptions like those relating to market values of real property improvements and the buildout schedule of such property are particularly sensitive in terms of the timing necessary to create the tax base for the Financing Districts. A small variation in these variables, and to their timing, can have a large effect on the forecasted results. There is a high probability that the forecasted results will differ from realized future tax base factors. Because Stan Bernstein and Associates, Inc. has not independently evaluated or reviewed the assumptions that the Fiscal Impact Analysis is based upon, we do not vouch for the achievability of the information presented on Exhibits I - V and on Schedules 1-4. Furthermore, because of the inherent nature of future events, which are subject to change and variation as events and circumstances change, the actual results may vary materially from the results presented on Exhibits I - V and on Schedules 1-7. Stan Bernstein and Associates, Inc. has no responsibility or obligation to update this information or this Fiscal Impact Analysis for events occurring after the date of this memorandum. If you have any questions or comments regarding this analysis, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, STAN BERNSTEIN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. (signed) Stan Bernstein and Associates, Inc.