KNG Health IPPS Modeling of BWC Claims for FYs /16/2016 Overview Data Approach

Similar documents
FY 2016 Inpatient PPS Final Rule

John Hellow Robert Roth Martin Corry

Presented by Tom Johansen, CPA th Street Plano, Texas Office: Direct:

Prospective Payment System for Long Term Care Hospitals: RY 2008 Proposed Rule

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. 42 CFR Parts 405, 412, 413, 415, 422, 424, 485, and 488

OPPS Webinar Information

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013

What Medicare Providers Need To Know About the IPPS/OPPS Final Rules and the Bipartisan Budget Act

FORM CMS This page is reserved for future use Rev. 8

HFMA s Regulatory Sound Bites. An Overview of the Final 2019 Inpatient Prospective Payment System Rule & Quick look at the Proposed 2019 OPPS

FY 2018 DRG Updates. Under both the Medicare PPS and the TRICARE DRG-based payment system, cases are

Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System

Rural Factors Affecting Reimbursement Getting Paid 101

Medicare Long Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System

Wage Index Training NWO HFMA. February 15, 2018

Medicare Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System

Current State of Medicare. Robert Roth & John Hellow Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC

Current State of Medicare

Medicare Long-term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2016

(Cont.) FORM CMS Line For cost reporting periods that overlap October 1, 2013 and subsequent years, enter the amount of the

2018 Medicare Fee-For-Service Prospective Payment Systems (As of 2/2/2018)

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System Federal Fiscal Year 2015

Medicare Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System Program Year: 2019

Basics of Medicare Coverage and Payment. Tom Ault Health Policy Alternatives April 20, 2007

FY 2015 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule: What You Need to Know. June 18, 2014

AHLA March Hospital IPPS Legislative and Regulatory Policy Update. John R. Hellow

114.6 CMR: DIVISION OF HEALTH CARE FINANCE AND POLICY MEDICAL SECURITY BUREAU

Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System

Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System

(C) Classification procedures are as described in rule 5160: of the Administrative Code.

Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System

Draft Recommendations on the Update Factors for FY 2017

Preliminary Cost Impact Analysis Florida Senate Bill 1580/House Bill 1531 As Requested on 3/03/2014

DEADLINE WHERE TO SEND APPLICATIONS. Mail eight (8) copies of each completed application to the following address:

Medicare Long- Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System Final Rule Federal Fiscal Year 2013 August 2012

Reimbursement & Cost Report Strategies. Reducing cost is NOT always the solution.

Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2017

Payment for Covered Services

Medicare Long-term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2017

Form CMS Update Transmittals 20 and 21

Inpatient hospital reimbursement.

Connecticut Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program

Payment Adjustments & Hardship Exceptions for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: March 2014

2016 ICR Changes and Filing Procedures. Form CMS Transmittals #7 and #8. Demonstration of Software Enhancements

The Leader in Medicare Cost Report Software. HFS Update. Luke DiSabato Health Financial Systems

4012 FORM CMS

Medicare Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System

Medicare DSH & Worksheet S-10. Kentucky HFMA March 29, 2018

Medicare DSH Dissecting Uncompensated Care Cost

Uncompensated Care Payments and Worksheet S-10. HFMA Maine Chapter

Medicare Payment Cut Analysis November 2013 Update -Version 1, November 2013-

Appendix B. LDO Financial Methodology (LDO CEC Model)

Economic Report of The President 2014

Small Rural Hospital Transition (SRHT) Project Guide

Chapter 6 Section 8. Hospital Reimbursement - TRICARE DRG-Based Payment System (Adjustments To Payment Amounts)

Estimate of Federal Payment Reductions to Hospitals Following the ACA

Medicare Program; FY 2017 Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Prospective Payment. AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System: Proposed Rule Federal Fiscal Year 2015 June 2014

Medicare Program; Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Prospective Payment System - Update

Introduction. Incentive Payments for. Health Care Regulatory and Compliance Insights. Daniel F. Gottlieb, Esq.

Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission (HSCRC) Global Budget Revenue (GBR) under the Maryland All-Payer Model

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) Measure

Chapter 6 Section 2. Hospital Reimbursement - TRICARE DRG-Based Payment System (General Description Of System)

Acute Inpatient Perspective Payment System (IPPS) Table 1: IPPS Labor Percentage

Mount Sinai Medical Center of Florida, Inc. and Subsidiaries

New IPPS Regulations & Cost Report Forms ( ) Hospital Finance & Reimbursement Workshop Columbia, SC November 15, 2011

On 5 A u g u s t President Bill

What are the adjustments to the TRICARE/CHAMPUS DRG-based payment amounts?

ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE FLORIDA REIMBURSEMENT MANUAL FOR HOSPITALS As Published on February 4, 2014

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CHAPTER IN-PATIENT HOSPITAL FEE SCHEDULE

Chapter 6 Section 2. Hospital Reimbursement - TRICARE DRG-Based Payment System (General Description Of System)

Chapter 6 Section 2. Hospital Reimbursement - TRICARE Diagnosis Related Group (DRG)-Based Payment System (General Description Of System)

February 19, Dear Ms. Verma,

Medicare Program; FY 2018 Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Prospective Payment System. AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE FLORIDA WORKERS COMPENSATION REIMBURSEMENT MANUAL FOR HOSPITAL INPATIENT EFFECTIVE UPON ADOPTION

Health Net 2009 PEARL PLAN NATIONAL PRIVATE FEE-FOR-SERVICE REINBURSEMENT GRID

Ch. 127 MEDICAL COST CONTAINMENT CHAPTER 127. WORKERS COMPENSATION MEDICAL COST CONTAINMENT

WYOMING MEDICAID IMPLEMENTATION OF APR DRGS

Annette Guilford, Senior Manager Carl Williams, Senior Accountant

Florida Agency for Health Care Administration

SUMMARY: This proposed rule requests public comment on proposed implementation for

Medicaid Advisory Hospital Group

Medi-Cal DRG Project

Coverage Expansion [Sections 310, 323, 324, 341, 342, 343, 344, and 1701]

Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, Inc. John R. Hellow

IHCP bulletin INDIANA HEALTH COVERAGE PROGRAMS BT MAY 22, 2012

January 1, State Notification Regarding Exchanges

Medicare payment policy and its impact on program spending

What Hospitals Need to Know About Cost Report Changes

Medicare/Medicaid Hospital Reimbursement Update. September 13, 2012

Medicare Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Measure

DRAFT: Update Factors Recommendations for FY 2015

State of New Mexico Human Services Department Human Services Register

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System Program Year: FY2018

DRAFT Recommendation for the Aggregate Revenue Amount At-Risk under Maryland Hospital Quality Programs for Rate Year 2018

Milliman RBRVS for Hospitals

HFMA FALL MEETING Embassy Suites, Lexington October 23, Stephen P. Miller Vice President of Finance Kentucky Hospital Association

Select Provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , H.R Overview: Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) Payments:

Transcription:

KNG Health IPPS Modeling of BWC Claims for FYs 2016-2017 6/16/2016 Overview KNG Health Consulting, LLC (KNG Health) projected Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation (Ohio BWC) inpatient hospital payments using Medicare final payment rules under the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) for fiscal years (FYs) 2016 and 2017. Data Ohio BWC provided data for 2,800 hospital discharges occurring between February 5, 2015 and January 31, 2016. One discharge was excluded from our analysis, because the claim listed Multi-EOB as the payment type. After this exclusion, our final data file included 2,799 claims. Payments were modeled in accordance with the appropriate IPPS Final Rule and the FY 2016 Ohio BWC Hospital Inpatient Reimbursement Rule. Hospital information was taken from the tables and supplemental data files released by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the Ohio BWC Inpatient Cost-to-Charge Ratio file, the Medicare Provider Specific File, and Medicare Hospital Cost Reports (2014). Figure 1 provides the source for each of the original data elements that were incorporated into this analysis. Approach Claims were sorted into three payment categories. The payment methodology was different for each category. 1. Exempt. Claims that were listed as exempt from Medicare severity diagnosis-relatedgroup (MS-DRG) payments (8.3% of claims in 2015). 2. Outliers. Claims that both did not fall into the prior category and qualified for outlier payments under the Medicare payment methodology (4.4% of claims in 2015). Claims qualified if operating and capital costs together exceeded operating and capital outlier thresholds together (see below for explanation of these costs and thresholds). 3. DRG. All other claims (87.3% of claims in 2015). A written explanation of the payment methodology is provided below. An alternative explanation using symbolic notation is provided at the end of this section. Payment for Exempt Claims For exempt claims, payment was based on estimated operating cost. Operating costs were estimated by multiplying the total provider billed amount by a hospital-specific operating costto-charge ratio (CCR). For hospitals without a specific hospital operating CCR, the proposed 2017 average CCR within the hospital s state and location type (Urban/Rural) was used (from CMS tables). For hospitals that were non-domestic or whose state was not identified, the proposed 2017 average urban CCR for Ohio was used. The estimated operating costs were

inflation-adjusted. Inflation adjustments were based on the approach used by CMS as specified in the proposed FY 2017 Rule. 1 Charges were first inflated by the two-year charge inflation factor (multiplied by 1.08985). For modeling FY 2016 payments, the square root of each of these two-year inflation factors was used. While only operating costs were used for Exempt claims, capital costs were used in other parts of the methodology (and inflated similarly throughout the methodology). After applying the inflation adjustments, operating costs were multiplied by a payment adjustment factor of 1.14. The payment was capped at 70% of the inflation-adjusted charges associated with the claim. Payment for DRG and Outlier Claims For DRG and Outliers, payments were estimated using the CMS IPPS methodology. Operating and capital standardized amounts were selected based on each hospital s wage index, compliance with hospital quality-reporting requirements, and meaningful use of electronic health records (EHR). Reductions related to federal budget sequestration were not applied. The following geographic adjustments were applied to the hospital-specific standardized amounts: The operating cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) was applied to the non-labor portion of the operating standardized amount. The wage index adjustment was applied to the labor portion of the operating standardized amount. The capital COLA adjustment and geographic adjustment factor were applied to the capital standardized amount. The following policy adjustments were applied to the hospital-specific standardized amounts: The operating Disproportionate Share (DSH), operating Indirect Medical Education (IME), Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) adjustment, and Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) adjustment were applied to the operating standardized amount. The capital DSH and capital IME adjustments were applied to the capital standardized amount. The Hospital-Acquired Condition adjustment was applied to both the operating and capital standardized amount. 1 Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 81

To compute the CMS operating and capital base payments, the operating and capital standardized amounts were multiplied by the MS-DRG weight corresponding to the DRG assigned to the claim. A hospital-specific fixed add-on payment for uncompensated care was added to the operating standardized amounts. We then determined the operating and capital fixed-loss outlier thresholds for each claim. The national operating fixed-loss threshold was adjusted for each hospital by the operating COLA adjustment and wage index. The capital fixed-loss thresholds were adjusted for each hospital by the capital COLA adjustment and the geographic adjustment factor. The operating base payment for each claim was added to hospital-specific operating fixed-loss threshold to compute a claim-specific operating fixed-loss amount. A claim-specific capital fixed-loss amount was computed similarly. Some DRG claims were treated at hospitals that do not participate in the Medicare program. As such hospitals are not included in the Impact File, geographic and policy adjustments cannot be applied. Payment for these claims was based on the (MS-DRG-adjusted) national standardized amount corresponding to the appropriate fiscal year. Final Payment for DRG Claims The final payment for DRG cases (non-outliers) was computed by adding a per-diem payment for direct medical education costs to the sum of the operating and capital base payments, then multiplying by a PAF. The FY 2017 PAF was calculated so as to make the aggregate payment to cost ratio for Ohio hospitals equal to 1.14, not including the effect on payments of quality initiative adjustments (HAC, VBP, HRRP), quality reporting compliance, or meaningful use of EHR. In calculating the PAF, charges were inflated as described above for Exempt cases, and costs were also deflated to account for changes in costs relative to charges. 2 In the Excel results, the costs presented reflect these charge inflation and cost-to-charge ratio deflation adjustments. This resulted in a FY 2017 PAF for DRG claims of 1.156. The FY 2016 PAF was given by Ohio BWC as 1.137. Final Payment for Outlier Claims For outlier claims, operating and capital outlier payments were determined separately. Outlier payments were equal to 80% of the difference between the cost and the outlier threshold. Outlier payments could not be negative. The operating and capital base payments were added to the operating and capital outlier payments. The final payment for outlier claims was computed by multiplying this sum by a PAF. The FY 2017 PAF was calculated as described above for DRG cases (non-outliers). This resulted in a FY 2017 PAF for Outlier claims of 1.774. The FY 2 The operating costs were multiplied by 0.94010 and capital costs were multiplied by 0.95128. These adjustments were taken from the FY 2017 IPPS Proposed Rule, and are based on the CMS methodology for determining the IPPS fixed-loss threshold.

2016 PAF was given by Ohio BWC as 1.805. The per diem payment for direct medical education was not applied for outlier cases. Final Steps Projected payments for FY 2015 and FY 2016 are summarized by payment category, MS-DRG, hospital, hospital ownership, hospital teaching status, hospital location type, hospital state, and bed size category. The calculated PAFs are listed. All of the described calculations were performed within Stata, a statistical software package.

Appendix 1: Alternative Explanation of IPPS Payment Modeling for Ohio BWC Payment for Exempt Cases (PAF = 1.14 for Exempt Cases) Exempt = Payment for exempt group PAF = Payment Adjustment Factor drg = DRG Case, out = Outlier Case ICh = Two-Year Charge Inflation Adjustment op = Operating, cap = Capital Ch = Charge CCR = Cost/Charge Ratio Exempt = minimum[(paf * ICh * CCR op * Ch), (0.7 * ICh * Ch)] Payment for DRG and Outlier Cases (PAF = 1.7740477 for DRG Cases; PAF = 1.1564537 for Outlier Cases) H = Hospital-Specific Payment Amount O = Operating Standardized Amount (dependent on quality reporting compliance, EHR meaningful use, and wage index) L% = Labor Percentage of Operating Standardized Amount W = Wage Index N% = Non-Labor Percentage of Operating Standardized Amount COLA = Cost-of-Living Adjustment DSH = DSH Adjustment (Centered around 0) IME = IME Adjustment (Centered around 0) VBP = Value-Based Purchasing Adjustment (Centered around 1) C = Capital Standardized Amount GAF = Geographic Adjustment Factor HAC = Hospital-Acquired Conditions Adjustment HRRP = Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program Adjustment H op = O * (L% * W + N% * COLA op) * (1+DSH op+ime op) H cap = C * COLA cap * GAF * (1+DSH cap+ime cap) DRG = Payment for DRG group D = MS-DRG weight UCC = Uncompensated Care Add-On Payment LOS = Length of Stay DME = Direct Medical Education per diem payment DRG = [ [((H op * VBP * HRRP + H cap) * D + UCC] * HAC + (LOS * DME)) ] * PAF DRG F = National Fixed-Loss Threshold F op = Hosptial-Specific Operating Fixed-Loss Threshold F cap = Hospital-specific Capital Fixed-Loss Threshold F op = H op * D + UCC + F * [CCR op/(ccro p+ccr cap)] * (L% * W + N% * COLA op) F cap = H cap * D + F * [CCR cap/(ccro p+ccr cap)] * COLA cap * GAF OP = Outlier Payment OP = 0.8 * {maximum[(ich * CCR op * Ch - F op), 0] + maximum[(ich * CCR cp * Ch F cap), 0]} Outlier = Payment for Outlier group Outlier = [ [((H op * VBP * HRRP + H cap) * D + UCC] * HAC + OP ] * PAF out

Figure 1. Source for Data Elements Incorporated into Analysis Data Element Source Note Patient information Ohio BWC Claims file Medicare Provider Number Ohio BWC Inpatient Cost-to-Charge File, previous KNG Health work for Ohio BWC, and manual search based on hospital name a Medicare Standardized Amounts Tables 1A through 1E from Proposed FY 2017 CMS Rule b HAC Adjustment Provider Specific File (2016) c Geographic adjustments Impact File from Proposed FY 2017 CMS Rule b Policy adjustments (except HAC) Impact File from Proposed FY 2017 CMS Rule b MS-DRG Weights Table 5 from Proposed FY 2017 CMS Rules b Uncompensated Care Payment Impact File from Proposed FY 2017 CMS Rule b Hospital-Specific Cost-to-Charge Ratios (CCRs) Impact File from Proposed FY 2017 CMS Rule b Statewide Cost-to-Charge Ratios Tables 8A and 8B from Proposed FY 2017 CMS Rule b Hospital Location Type (Urban/Rural) Hospital Cost Report (2014) d Fixed-Loss Outlier Threshold IPPS Proposed FY 2017 Rule b Direct Medical Education Payment Ohio BWC Inpatient Cost-to-Charge File a Hospital ownership and beds Hospital Cost Report (2014) d Hospital teaching status Impact File from Proposed FY 2017 CMS Rule b Hospital state Based on first two digits of Medicare provider number Inflation Adjustment IPPS Proposed FY 2017 Rule b Links a) https://www.bwc.ohio.gov/downloads/blankpdf/hospinpatientcostcharge0216.xlsx b) https://www.cms.gov/medicare/medicare-fee-for-service-payment/acuteinpatientpps/fy2017-ipps-proposed-rule-home-page.html c) https://www.cms.gov/medicare/medicare-fee-for-service-payment/prospmedicarefeesvcpmtgen/psf_text.html d) https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/downloadable-public-use-files/cost-reports/cost-reports-by-fiscal-year.html 15245 Shady Grove Road Suite 365 Rockville MD 20850 www.knghealth.com