MARKET POWER AND MISREPRESENTATION

Similar documents
3/1/2016. Intermediate Microeconomics W3211. Lecture 7: The Endowment Economy. Today s Aims. The Story So Far. An Endowment Economy.

ECON 105 Homework 2 KEY Open Economy Macroeconomics Due November 29

Ricardian Model. Mercantilism: 17 th and 18 th Century. Adam Smith s Absolute Income Hypothesis, End of 18 th Century: Major Shift in Paradigm

A ppendix to. I soquants. Producing at Least Cost. Chapter

THE FINAL PROOF SUPPORTING THE TURNOVER FORMULA.

Edgeworth box. apples. F-f. A-a. trade. f f F. fig leaves

UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM. Discussion Papers in Economics BERTRAND VS. COURNOT COMPETITION IN ASYMMETRIC DUOPOLY: THE ROLE OF LICENSING

Trigonometry - Activity 21 General Triangle Solution: Given three sides.

Addition and Subtraction

Effects of Entry Restriction on Free Entry General Competitive Equilibrium. Mitsuo Takase

PSAS: Government transfers what you need to know

Conditions for GrowthLink

"Multilateralism, Regionalism, and the Sustainability of 'Natural' Trading Blocs"

Conditions for FlexiLink

Problem Set 4 - Solutions. Suppose when Russia opens to trade, it imports automobiles, a capital-intensive good.

Cache CPI and DFAs and NFAs. CS230 Tutorial 10

Problem Set 2 Suggested Solutions

Technical Appendix. The Behavior of Growth Mixture Models Under Nonnormality: A Monte Carlo Analysis

Optimal Revenue-Sharing Double Auctions with Applications to Ad Exchanges

A Closer Look at Bond Risk: Duration

The Market Approach to Valuing Businesses (Second Edition)

Chapter 3: The Reinforcement Learning Problem. The Agent'Environment Interface. Getting the Degree of Abstraction Right. The Agent Learns a Policy

Autarky more likely than complete specialization

What is Monte Carlo Simulation? Monte Carlo Simulation

Pricing Resources on Demand

INF 4130 Exercise set 4

ASYMMETRIC SWITCHING COSTS CAN IMPROVE THE PREDICTIVE POWER OF SHY S MODEL

2x2x2 Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson (H-O-S) Model with no factor substitution

Gridworld Values V* Gridworld: Q*

The Combinatorial Seller s Bid Double Auction: An Asymptotically Efficient Market Mechanism*

Buckling of Stiffened Panels 1 overall buckling vs plate buckling PCCB Panel Collapse Combined Buckling

OPEN BUDGET QUESTIONNAIRE SOUTH AFRICA

The MA health reform and other issues

International Monopoly under Uncertainty

International Budget Partnership OPEN BUDGET QUESTIONNAIRE POLAND

Sanna-Randaccio: Lectures n The Ricardian Model

Arithmetic and Geometric Sequences

UNIT 7 SINGLE SAMPLING PLANS

CITY OF CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE APPLICATION FOR OFFER IN COMPROMISE OF A TAX DEBT BASED ON FINANCIAL HARDSHIP CITY OF CHICAGO

Earning Money. Earning Money. Curriculum Ready ACMNA: 189.

JOURNAL THE ERGODIC TM CANDLESTICK OSCILLATOR ROBERT KRAUSZ'S. Volume 1, Issue 7

Bequest motives and fertility decisions B

CH 71 COMPLETING THE SQUARE INTRODUCTION FACTORING PERFECT SQUARE TRINOMIALS

AS and A Level Economics A

First Assignment, Federal Income Tax, Spring 2019 O Reilly. For Monday, January 14th, please complete problem set one (attached).

Technical Report Global Leader Dry Bulk Derivatives. FIS Technical - Grains And Ferts. Highlights:

MATH 236 ELAC MATH DEPARTMENT FALL 2017 SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

myifxbrokers Quick Start Guide

Pillar 3 Quantitative Disclosure

Section 2.2 Trigonometry: The Triangle Identities

Chapter 02: International Flow of Funds

International Budget Partnership OPEN BUDGET QUESTIONNAIRE Slovenia, September 2009

OPEN BUDGET QUESTIONNAIRE MACEDONIA

checks are tax current income.

OPEN BUDGET QUESTIONNAIRE

The Morgan Stanley FTSE 100 Income Plan. Investor Pack

(a) by substituting u = x + 10 and applying the result on page 869 on the text, (b) integrating by parts with u = ln(x + 10), dv = dx, v = x, and

OPEN BUDGET QUESTIONNAIRE UKRAINE

Technical Report Global Leader Dry Bulk Derivatives

Outline. CSE 326: Data Structures. Priority Queues Leftist Heaps & Skew Heaps. Announcements. New Heap Operation: Merge

Get Solution of These Packages & Learn by Video Tutorials on KEY CONCEPTS

COMPLETE COVER - `ADD ON' TO TRAVEL INSURANCE POLICIES CONFERENCE & EVENT ORGANISERS SCHEDULE

OPEN BUDGET QUESTIONNAIRE

Technical Report Global Leader Dry Bulk Derivatives. FIS Technical - Grains And Ferts. Highlights:

Choice of strategic variables under relative profit maximization in asymmetric oligopoly

End-of-year tax planning tips for business

Pillar 3 Quantitative Disclosure

The Irrelevance of Control Rights in Agency Models under Risk Neutrality 1

International Budget Partnership OPEN BUDGET QUESTIONNAIRE United Kingdom, September 2009

PRICING CONVERTIBLE BONDS WITH KNOWN INTEREST RATE. Jong Heon Kim

EFFECTS OF THE SINGLE EUROPEAN MARKET ON WELFARE OF THE PARTICIPATING COUNTRIES (theoretical approach)

OPEN BUDGET QUESTIONNAIRE CZECH REPUBLIC

Access your online resources today at

OPEN BUDGET QUESTIONNAIRE

Template kiwi startups agreement for future equity

Economics Department Fall 2013 Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Assessment Economics 4 (Principles of Microeconomics)

Roma December 2008 Cadastre and agriculture subsidies : the Spanish experience

The Okun curve is non-linear

News Release Half-year Results 20 February Review of results and operations. Excluding significant items a

Optimal firm's policy under lead time- and price-dependent demand: interest of customers rejection policy

Smart Investment Strategies

Technical Report Global Leader Dry Bulk Derivatives. FIS Technical - Grains And Ferts. Highlights:

International Budget Partnership OPEN BUDGET QUESTIONNAIRE Sri Lanka, September 2009

Asset finance (US) Opportunity. Flexibility. Planning. Develop your capabilities using the latest equipment

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY

A portfolio approach to the optimal funding of pensions

Is the Armington Elasticity Really Constant across Importers?

Long-term Memory Review PROFICIENCY PRACTICE: MONDAY REVIEW

Non-homothetic preferences, parallel imports and the extensive margin of international trade

A Fuzzy Inventory Model With Lot Size Dependent Carrying / Holding Cost

Return of Private Foundation

ECO 2016/05 Department of Economics. The Political Economy of Services Trade Agreements. Matteo Fiorini and Mathilde Lebrand

Note there is training available on LMS about the Congestion Hedging / TCR markets.

POLICY BRIEF 11 POTENTIAL FINANCING OPTIONS FOR LARGE CITIES

Name Date. Find the LCM of the numbers using the two methods shown above.

A Employer identification number

The Political Economy of Services Trade Agreements

Exhibit A Covered Employee Notification of Rights Materials Regarding Allied Managed Care Incorporated Allied Managed Care MPN MPN ID # 2360

OPEN BUDGET QUESTIONNAIRE FRANCE

The Unsolicited Proposal What the Public Sector Needs to Know What the Private Sector Should Expect

Transcription:

MARKET POWER AND MISREPRESENTATION MICROECONOMICS Principles nd Anlysis Frnk Cowell Note: the detil in slides mrked * cn only e seen if you run the slideshow July 2017 1

Introduction Presenttion concerns trding ehviour Context is n exchnge economy usul focus is on simple price-tking ut we will exmine non-competitive ehviour Use stndrd modelling frmework Endow trders with different degrees of power cptured in the trding rules Extend this to simple model of mnipultion nd design Begin with simple nlysis of nonliner prices July 2017 2

Overview Mrket Power nd Misrepresenttion Mrket power Nonliner price systems Exchnge nd monopoly Misinformtion July 2017 3

The setting Consider n exchnge economy Suppose one gent hs extended monopoly power Cn chrge fee for the right to ccess good 1 this cn only work for goods where resle is difficult otherwise consumers cn undermine the fee y ulk-uying nd selling on the commodity to others sometimes pulic utilities fit this prdigm Assume tht ny other trder cts s price tker Anlyse this within the context of the Edgeworth ox July 2017 4

The model Two goods (1,2) nd two trders (Alf, Bill) Given resource distriution endowments of two goods re such tht Bill owns ll good 1 Alf: [R 1, R 2 ] = [0, R 2 ] Bill: [R 1, R 2 ] = [R 1, R 2 ] R 2 := R 2 + R 2 Trding outcomes descried y lloction vector of consumptions Alf: [, ] Bill: [, ] Use good 2 s numérire price of good 1 is p := p 1 /p 2 Assume mterils lnce condition stisfied with equlity + = R 1 + = R 2 permits use of the Edgeworth ox digrm July 2017 5

Mrket power Suppose Bill hs the power to set the price p nd the entry fee F Then Bill cn fix udget constrint for Alf nywhere in the digrm suject to one importnt condition this hs to do with the trding rules see elow Bill s control over the udget constrint: p fixes the slope; F fixes the position In effect Bill hs the power to set non-liner price system the pir (p, F) exmine how this works: July 2017 6

F The two-prt triff [R] 0 The endowment point Fixed chrge Price per unit p 0 July 2017 7

*Chnging the udget constrint [R] 0 Vrying F Vrying p 0 July 2017 8

Key condition Bill nerly hs totl control over Alf However, one thing remins in Alf s power: Alf does not hve to consume good 1 cn just consume his endowment [R 1, R 2 ] This condition effectively constrins Bill s ction Drw Alf s indifference curve through the endowment point Alf s reservtion indifference curve cnnot e forced to trde t n lloction with lower level of utility This is the oundry of Bill s ttinle set Begin with cse where Bill considers goods perfect sustitutes July 2017 9

F Exploittion solution [R] 0 s indifference curves Endowment point s reservtion indiff curve s constrint set s indifference curves The solution Entry fee nd price [x ] p 0 July 2017 10

Solution works in generl cse F [R] 0 Bsic model s efore s indifference curves Solution s efore [x ] p 0 July 2017 11

Full mrket power: the result Bill hs mximl power in mrket for good 1 cn use nonliner pricing scheme sets price rtio nd entry fee to mrket for good 1 Outcome is full exploittion trding prtner is forced to reserve indifference curve solution lloction [x ] is on indifference curve through [R] But it is efficient t [x ] MRS is is the sme for oth trders so it is on the contrct curve Solution pplies for generl form of Bill s preferences July 2017 12

Overview Mrket Power nd Misrepresenttion Mrket power Power ply in the Edgeworth ox Exchnge nd monopoly Misinformtion July 2017 13

Using the ide of mrket power We ve chrcterised mrket power in simplified cse Bill hd uilt-in monopolistic dvntge lso endowed with complete mrket power Now use this model pply this to numer of trding stories gin in simplified world Address some key questions How relted to competitive outcomes? Under wht circumstnces will we get n efficient outcome? July 2017 14

Trding: lterntive stories A cse with simplified property distriution Bill hs ll of commodity 1 Alf hs ll of commodity 2 Review the stndrd equilirium concepts the core competitive equilirium Exmine two polr cses 1. Bill hs complete mrket power (cn choose point in A s cceptnce set) 2. Alf hs complete mrket power Then consider limited mrket power Alf cn ct s simple monopolist July 2017 15

Trding nd competition [R] s indifference 0 curves s indifference curves The contrct curve Endowment point Trdes cceptle to & The core CE nd prices [x*] p* 0 July 2017 16

Bill hs totl mrket power [R] Competitive equilirium 0 s opportunity set given mrket power s optiml lloction A nonliner schedule to implement it [x*] [x ] 0 July 2017 17

Alf hs totl mrket power [R] [x ] s opportunity 0 set given mrket power s optiml lloction A nonliner schedule to implement it [x*] 0 July 2017 18

Simple monopoly The three stories hve common element chrcterise three points in the core ll stories hve efficient outcomes Now story with less thn complete mrket power Alf cn simply set the price Bill cts s price tker Rework the digrm first mp out Alf s ttinle lloctions then chrcterise optimum conditionl on this restricted-power model July 2017 19

Alf cn set prices [R] 0 s preferences Endowment tries out lterntive prices s rection function s ttinle set 0 July 2017 20

Monopoly trding [R] 0 s preferences [x] ^ [x ] Efficient lloctions (contrct curve) s monopolistic optimum MRS nd prices t optimum Competitive equilirium s totl mrket power solution ^p [x*] 0 July 2017 21

Summry of mrket power model Suppose Alf hs mrket power Gets higher utility thn in CE Gets higher utility if hs totl mrket power thn s simple monopolist CE nd totl mrket power re efficient Simple monopoly is inefficient price = Alf s MRS price Bill s MRS July 2017 22

Overview Mrket Power nd Misrepresenttion Mrket power Applying the simple monopoly model Exchnge nd monopoly Misinformtion July 2017 23

Misrepresenttion The stndrd exchnge model tells simple story But relies on strong informtionl ssumption ech trder hs full informtion out the other s preferences Wht hppens if we drop this? Use the sme model s the mrket power exmple tke the cse where Alf owns good 2 Bill owns good 1 Strt from cse of perfect informtion Then suppose tht Alf misrepresents preferences Bill continues to revels full informtion July 2017 24

Misrepresenttion nd distortion [R] ^ [x] s true 0 ICs s true ICs The contrct curve Endowment point & core CE lloction nd prices s flse IC Induced equilirium with s misrepresenttion p^ [x*] p* 0 July 2017 25

Misrepresenttion: outcome The equilirium hs een seen efore version with Alf s misrepresented preferences sme tht for simple monopolist Opportunity to msquerde induces distortion trder with informtionl dvntge forces price in his fvour in this cse: price rtio = MRS MRS Bilterl trding is mnipulle y reveling flse preferences Alf secures higher utility for himself Wht if oth cn misrepresent? outcome is still likely to e inefficient July 2017 26

Misrepresenttion nd distortion (2) [R] [x] ~ ^ [x] 0 True indifference curves The contrct curve & core CE lloction nd prices s flse ICs Outcome if misrepresents s flse IC Outcome if oth misrepresent p^ [x*] p* 0 July 2017 27

Appliction Consider model of interntionl trde Alflnd exports good 2 Billestn exports good 1 Price rtio is terms of trde suppose one country cn impose triff get inefficient (monopoly) outcome suppose other country retlites with its own triff outcome my still e inefficient Sme outcomes could rise if ech country cn misrepresent preferences of its citizens Could design n efficient outcome if use nonliner prices Alflnd demnds pyment F for ccess to mrket for good 2 or vice vers for Billestn nd good 1 July 2017 28