Static Revenue fromads Lives & 10-year T- bond Rate Adjustment. Static Revenue from ADS Lives & 2.2% Inflation & 1.5% Real Return

Similar documents
SLOWING DEPRECIATION TO PAY FOR CORPORATE TAX RATE REDUCTION

ECONOMICS OF TRUMP S TAX PLAN: CASE STUDY OF REPEALING SALT DEDUCTION

ESTATE TAXES, DEFICITS, AND BUDGET IMPLICATIONS

Dynamic Scoring and Tax Reform

Federal Employees Retirement System: Budget and Trust Fund Issues

CGT AND COMPLIANCE COSTS ARE A DOUBLE TAX ON NZ BUSINESSES

ESTATE TAXES, DEFICITS and BUDGET IMPLICATIONS

Federal Employees Retirement System: Budget and Trust Fund Issues

Federal Employees Retirement System: Budget and Trust Fund Issues

Economic Analysis of Corporate Tax Reform Policy Options Tradeoffs Affecting Revenue and Growth Assumptions

Solow instead assumed a standard neo-classical production function with diminishing marginal product for both labor and capital.

Special Report. Using Dynamic Analysis Makes Tax Reform 30 Percent Less Challenging. Key Findings. August 2013 No. 210

Real Options and Risk Analysis in Capital Budgeting

WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE BUDGET OUTLOOK. William Gale Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center February 8, 2013 ABSTRACT

MCCI BUSINESS CONFIDENCE INDICATOR

Meeting with Analysts

The Impact of the Global Financial Crisis on Emerging Markets - The Case of China

Tools of Budget Analysis (Chapter 4 in Gruber s textbook) 131 Undergraduate Public Economics Emmanuel Saez UC Berkeley

PART ONE INTRODUCTION

Written Testimony of Scott A. Hodge, President, Tax Foundation

Federal Employees Retirement System: Budget and Trust Fund Issues

The Ryan Medicare Plan: Winners and Losers

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania MID-YEAR. Revenue Update. January 29, Mid-Year Update

Implications of a Rising Rate Environment

(Refer Slide Time: 01:02)

Federal Employees Retirement System: Budget and Trust Fund Issues

GLOBAL EDITION. Using and Understanding Mathematics. A Quantitative Reasoning Approach SIXTH EDITION. Jeffrey Bennett William Briggs

How Big Should the Public Capital Stock Be?

Details and Analysis of Donald Trump s Tax Plan

Alpha Bank ECB Comprehensive Assessment Overview. October 26, 2014

CRS Report for Congress

CAPITAL BUDGETING Shenandoah Furniture, Inc.

Forwards and Futures

The Impact of Federal Tax Reform on the States

Trump s Economic Policy Proposals Back to the Future? Bob Murphy Department of Economics Boston College

WikiLeaks Document Release

Example 19.1 The Value Added Tax

PIAGGIO GROUP ANALYST AND INVESTOR MEETING

unusually small at the end of 2017 and the beginning of 2018 as a result of debt-ceiling constraints.

Feldstein Proposal Increases Federal Revenues but the Devil s in the Details

Ensuring Escape from the Deflationary Spiral and to Again Increase Consumption Tax

Covered Bonds: Design, Use and Prerequisites for Emerging Markets Dr. Michael Lea For Housing Finance Conference Central Bank of Peru May 11, 2009

Creating and Assigning Targets

Projections for outstanding government debt in Japan

Fiscal Fact. The Effects of Terminating Tax Expenditures and Cutting Individual Income Tax Rates. By Michael Schuyler, PhD

Deficits and Debt: Economic Effects and Other Issues

Lecture Notes 1: Solow Growth Model

Managing the Risk of Variable Annuities: a Decomposition Methodology Presentation to the Q Group. Thomas S. Y. Ho Blessing Mudavanhu.

BUSINESS TAX REFORM: THE ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF A BORDER ADJUSTMENT TAX FEBRUARY 2, what does REMI say? sm

The Theory of Economic Growth

The Theory of Economic Growth

Measuring the Value of Rate Segmentation

An Overview of Recent Tax Reform Proposals

PAPER No. 8: Financial Management MODULE No. 27: Capital Structure in practice

Bank & Financial Institution Modeling: Certification Quiz Questions Module 3 Bank Valuation

Methods of Financial Appraisal

Some Preliminary Macroeconomics of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

4Appendix to chapter. In our discussion of interest-rate risk, we saw that when interest rates change, a. Measuring Interest-Rate Risk: Duration

The Economics of the Federal Budget Deficit

R E S U LT S 1 ST Q U A R T E R M A Y

Agencia Tributaria TAX REVENUE ANNUAL REPORT

Bond Ratings, Cost of Debt and Debt Ratios. Aswath Damodaran

Fiscal Aspects of Normalizing Central Banks Balance Sheets

LECTURE 3 NEO-CLASSICAL AND NEW GROWTH THEORY

Preliminary Details and Analysis of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

PPI Briefing Note Number 97 Page 1 5.9% 5.8% 5.9% 5.7% Source: PPI Aggregate Model

Preliminary Details and Analysis of the Senate s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Analysis and Action Why is Inflation so Low?

Friday, November 30 Handout: Aggregate Demand/Aggregate Supply Model The Dynamics Review

GETTING TO AN EFFICIENT CARBON TAX How the Revenue Is Used Matters

Effects of the PPACA Health Insurance Premium Tax on Small Businesses and Their Employees

COVER TITLE. Piaggio Group Full Year 2017 Financial Results. Conference Call February 28 th 2018

Consumption-Savings Decisions and Credit Markets

R E S U LT S 3 R D Q U A R T E R AN D 9 M O N T H S N O V E M B E R

Distributed PV and Third-Party Financing 101 for Utilities August 8, 2013

Entrepreneurship and new ventures finance. Venture evaluation (3): Real options (first part) Prof. Antonio Renzi

Funding Stabilization and PBGC Premium Increases

Real Options. Katharina Lewellen Finance Theory II April 28, 2003

Tangible Property Regulations. Crystal Germanese, CPA, MSAT December 18, 2013

Economic Growth. (c) Copyright 1999 by Douglas H. Joines 1. Module Objectives

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PRIVATE PENSIONS OUTLOOK 2008 ISBN

PENSIONS POLICY INSTITUTE. Comparison of pension outcomes under EET and TEE tax treatment

Chapter 9. Depreciation. Principles of Engineering Economic Analysis, 5th edition

Economic growth prospects in the Czech Republic

Chapter 16 Depreciation Methods

Fed Cattle Basis: An Updated Overview of Concepts and Applications

Putting Capital Back to Work for America

Federal Tax Reform. Agenda. Federal Tax Rate Decreases from 35% Impact of Federal tax reform. What is our deferred tax balance?

See Barro, Macroeconomics, Chapter 14, Public debt, page 256, column 1, Figure 14-1

Disclosure 11/1/2011. From Jeff Bush

Cash Value Cost of Ignoring Life Insurance (Roth IRA vs. IUL)

Indexed Universal Life vs. A Tax Deductible Retirement Plan (TDRP) For Joe Tanner. Presented By: [Licensed user's name appears here]

Earnings at Risk: Real-world Risk Management

Testimony for the Senate Finance Committee on February 2, 2005 Stephen C. Goss, Chief Actuary Social Security Administration

Tax Reform and Charitable Giving

A Dynamic Analysis of President Obama s Tax Initiatives

Analysis of CBO s April 2018 Budget and Economic Outlook April 9, 2018

AICPA/FMS: Securities Industry Conference Tax Panel. October 17, 2018

Redefining retirement income for the DC generation. Matthew Blakstad NEST Insight

The impact of different financing structures on investor risk. Marco Cometto OECD/NEA, Nuclear Development Division

Transcription:

Table 1. Annual Write-Offs under Expensing, MACRS, ADS, and Various Adjustments to ADS, Sum over Life, and Present Value 5-Year Asset Costing $100 Inflation = 2.2% Real Discount Rate = 3.25% Year: 1 2 3 4 5 6 SUM P.V. Expensing 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 MACRS 20.00 32.00 19.20 11.52 11.52 5.76 100.00 91.17 ADS 10.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 10.00 100.00 87.85 ADS & Inflation (=2.2%) 10.00 20.44 20.89 21.35 21.82 11.15 105.65 92.57 ADS & T-bond Rate (=2.86%) 10.00 20.57 21.16 21.77 22.39 11.51 107.40 94.04 ADS, Inflation + 1.5% (=3.7%) 10.00 20.74 21.51 22.30 23.13 11.99 109.67 95.93 ADS, Inflation + 3.25% (=5.45%) 10.00 21.09 22.24 23.45 24.73 13.04 114.55 100.00 Notes: Expensing is immediate write-off of the full cost of the asset. MACRS is the current modified accelerated cost recovery system. ADS is the Alternative Depreciation System, also in current law use. Inflation is the average inflation rate forecast by the Congressional Budget Office over the ten year budget window. The T-bond rate is the current ten-year Treasury bond rate. The 1.5 percent adjustment is equal to a more normal level of interest rates. The 3.25 percent adjustment is the long term real return on capital. This is full neutral cost recovery.

Table 2. Static Revenue over the Ten Year Budget Window Switching from MACRS to ADS or to Variations Building toward Full Neutral Cost Recovery *Dollar figures in billions Static Revenue from ADS Lives Static Revenue from 2.2% Inflation Adjustment Static Revenue fromads Lives & 10-year T- bond Rate Adjustment Static Revenue from 2.2% Inflation & 1.5% Real Return Corporate switch to ADS $388 $349 $337 $320 $285 Individual switch to ADS $253 $224 $215 $203 $178 Both switch to ADS $641 $573 $552 $524 $462 Static Revenue from 2.2% Inflation & 3.25% Real Return Static 10-year loss vs. ADS $0 -$68 -$89 -$118 -$179 Potential static revenue savings from phasing in the corporate tax rate reduction: 3-year phase-in $88 5-year phase-in $210 Notes: Augmenting ADS to avoid an investment drop can be paid for in a static sense by reducing the rate reduction by the decrease in static revenues or by reducing the cost of the rate reductions by phasing in the rate cuts. A 3-year phase-in of the corporate tax rate reduction would cover the cost of adjusting the ADS write-offs for 2.2 percent forecasted inflation or enlarging them each year by the ten-year Treasury bond rate for both the corporate and individual ADS. A 5-year phase-in of the corporate tax rate cut would more-than-cover individual and corporate ADS adjustments for inflation plus a 1.5 percent real return or a more generous 3.25 percent real return equal to the long run return on capital a neutral cost recovery. A 5-year phase-in would cut the static cost of moving to a 25 percent corporate rate from $1.3 trillion to $1.09 trillion. The static corporate gain ($285 billion) from the neutral cost (3.25 percent real return) version of ADS would cover 26 percent of the cost of the $1.09 trillion phased-in corporate rate cut. That is nearly the same share of the cost of an immediate rate cut (30 percent of $1.3 trillion) that could be covered by an unadjusted ADS ($388 billion). But the neutral cost option would yield a 4 percent gain in GDP instead of a nearly 1 percent loss (see Table 3).

Table 3. Alternative Cost Recovery and Rate Cut Scenarios Long Run GDP and Budget Outcomes *Dollar figures in billions of 2012 dollars; figures are annual amounts Long Run Economic and Budget Changes vs. 2013 Law, Annual Steady State Outcome Rate Cuts Only, No "Pay-For" Rate Cuts Offset by ADS Rate Cuts with ADS Lives & 2.2% Inflation Adjustment Rate Cuts with 10-year T-bond Rate Adjustment Rate Cuts with 2.2% Inflation & 1.5% Real Return Rate Cuts with 2.2% Inflation & 3.25% Real Return GDP 0.83% -0.95% 0.41% 0.97% 1.81% 4.07% Private business 2.21% -2.87% 1.02% 2.66% 5.11% 11.94% stocks Wage rate 0.62% -0.90% 0.27% 0.75% 1.46% 3.39% Private business 0.25% -0.08% 0.16% 0.26% 0.41% 0.81% hours of work Static revenue -$32.80 -$4.30 -$25.50 -$33.40 -$44.60 -$73.60 Dynamic revenue -$5.20 -$36.50 -$11.70 -$0.80 $15.20 $57.70 $GDP $129.20 -$149.00 $63.70 $152.10 $282.00 $634.80 Corporate rate (now 35%) 32.19% = 32.19% 32.48% 32.57% 32.69% 32.94% Individual Tax Rates Current 10.00% 10.00% = 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 15.00% 14.63% = 14.63% 14.67% 14.68% 14.70% 14.74% 25.00% 25.00% = 25.00% 25.00% 25.00% 25.00% 25.00% 28.00% 27.78% = 27.78% 27.80% 27.81% 27.82% 27.84% 33.00% 32.40% = 32.40% 32.47% 32.49% 32.52% 32.58% 35.00% 34.25% = 34.25% 34.34% 34.36% 34.40% 34.47% 39.60% 38.51% = 38.51% 38.63% 38.67% 38.72% 38.83% Note: Phasing in the rate cuts over three or five years would permit the rate reductions in the first two columns to be kept throughout, increasing GDP gains in the other cases.

Percentage Change in GDP 5% 4% GDP Benefits of Neutral Cost Recovery Compared To ADS 4.07% 3% 2% 1.81% 1% 0.83% 0.41% 0% -1% -2% Rate Cuts Only -0.95% ADS ADS Indexed at 2.2% Inflation Revenue Neutral Options ADS Indexed for Inflation Plus 1.5% Return ADS Indexed for Inflation Plus 3.25% Return