Brad Sears Christy Mallory. May 2014

Similar documents
The 100 Largest U.S Corporations, 2010

Macro through Micro Fourth Quarter 2014

CORPORATE INCLUSION INDEX HACR CII HACR CII 1

CROSSMARK STEWARD COVERED CALL INCOME FUND HOLDINGS August 31, 2018

CROSSMARK STEWARD COVERED CALL INCOME FUND HOLDINGS October 31, 2018

Fund commentary ETF. John Hancock Multifactor ETFs Q3 2017

Back-test showing the power of Price to Free Cash Flow in the Investment Process

SURVEY: FORTUNE 100 CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES DISCLOSURE

Stock Repurchases Effects on Earnings Per Share [The National Accounting Journal, Vol. 8, No. 2, Fall/Winter 2006, pp ]

January 3, Company ABC, Inc Main Street. Re: 25, In 2011, Company based to the. based 200% 150% 100% 50% 0% TSR $85.54 $44.

Canada. This briefing paper includes:

β = 1 DOES A BETTER JOB THAN CALCULATED BETAS

QUARTERLY REPORT November 30, 2017 MFS VALUE FUND

Fresno County Employees' Retirement Association Performance Review Summary Period Ending: September 30, 2005

SHAREHOLDER VALUE CREATORS AND DESTROYERS IN THE DOW JONES: YEAR 2008

Invesco PowerShares Attribution Report PowerShares QQQ (QQQ) vs. S&P 500 Index

METHODOLOGY. Donald H. Schepers, PhD Naomi A. Gardberg, PhD

Quarterly Report May 31, 2018 MFS. Low Volatility Equity Fund

John Hancock Retirement Income 2040 Fund

SMART BETA REBALANCE SUMMARY USA SINGLE FACTORS

INSTITUTIONAL QUARTERLY OWNERSHIP REPORT

($-million) Corporation

San Mateo County. Investment Portfolio Compliance Report. January 31, 2014

How Relevant is the Disclosure of a CEO Pay Ratio?

Jobs Australia National Conference The Cause Report. John McLeod, JBWere Philanthropic Services October 2016

Fresno County Employees' Retirement Association Performance Review Summary Period Ending: December 31, 2005

UMF CA/NEVADA EQUITY ACCOUNT (TOTAL ACCOUNT) December 31, 2018 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

Fresno County Employees' Retirement Association Performance Review Summary Period Ending: March 31, 2006

The 2010 Corporate Social Responsibility Index

Short-Term Income Fund

Shares Description Value

Offshore Shell Games

Presentation to the City of Los Angeles Investment Advisory Committee. December 31, 2014

Short-Term Income Fund

HIGH MODERATE LOW SECURITY. Speculative Stock Junk Bonds Collectibles. Blue Chip or Growth Stocks Real Estate Mutual Funds

Worker Capitalism Triumphs

Name of Issuer Quantity Fair Value ($) Name of Issuer Quantity Fair Value ($) Celgene Corp. Incyte Corp. Amazon.com, Inc. Ulta Beauty, Inc.

San Mateo County. Investment Portfolio Compliance Report. February 29, 2016

Presentation to the City of Los Angeles Investment Advisory Committee. August 31, 2014

Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF

San Mateo County. Investment Portfolio Compliance Report. January 31, 2016

LA18-14 STATE OF NEVADA. Report on Count of Money In State Treasury June 30, Legislative Auditor Carson City, Nevada

Presentation to the City of Los Angeles Treasurer on the City's General Pool Investments. April 30, 2015

MAI Managed Volatility Fund

MFS LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY FUND

Fresno County Employees' Retirement Association Cumulative Performance Comparisons Period Ending: June 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA TAMPA FIREFIGHTERS & POLICE OFFICERS PENSION FUND SEPTEMBER 30, 2009

Fresno County Employees' Retirement Association Performance Review Summary Period Ending: June 30, 2006

PHILLIPS, HAGER & NORTH

MANAGEMENT S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING

Name of Issuer Quantity Fair Value ($) Name of Issuer Quantity Fair Value ($) Celgene Corp. Incyte Corp. Amazon.com, Inc. Ulta Beauty, Inc.

Summary. Deloitte may provide, or may seek to provide, services to one or more of the companies identified in this Financial Performance Analysis.

Fresno County Employees' Retirement Association Performance Review Summary Period Ending: December 31, 2005

INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY REPORT

Hand Composite Employee Benefit Trust Western Asset Core Bond CIF

Six (6) Financial Institutions currently invest or make available an estimated USD$ 2, million in nuclear weapons companies.

Q3 Individual Equity Holdings in the Advisor Perspectives Universe

Presentation to the City of Los Angeles Treasurer on the City's General Pool Investments. October 31, 2018

JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund Schedule of Portfolio Investments as of March 31, 2018 (Unaudited)

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM N-Q. Filing Date: Period of Report: SEC Accession No

SEMIANNUAL REPORT JUNE 30, VP Income & Growth Fund

Dodge & Cox Balanced Fund (146) Portfolio Holdings as of December 31, 2017

Statement of Investments July 31, 2015 (Unaudited)

Presentation to the City of Los Angeles Investment Advisory Committee. August 31, 2013

JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund Schedule of Portfolio Investments as of September 30, 2016 (Unaudited)

MISSION RESPONSIBILITY THROUGH INVESTMENT 2013 SHAREHOLDER RESOLUTIONS DIRECTORY WITH PROXY VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS.

Presentation to the City of Los Angeles Treasurer on the City's General Pool Investments. September 30, 2018

Presentation to the City of Los Angeles Treasurer on the City's General Pool Investments. August 31, 2016

Horizons Enhanced Income US Equity (USD) ETF (HEA.U, HEA.V, HEA, HEA.A:TSX)

Presentation to the City of Los Angeles Investment Advisory Committee. September 30, 2013

Presentation to the City of Los Angeles Treasurer on the City's General Pool Investments. July 31, 2015

Presentation to the City of Los Angeles Treasurer on the City's General Pool Investments. April 30, 2018

Portfolio Benchmark Currency Sequoia S&P 500 TR US Dollar Highlights 12/1/2005 to 11/30/2010

Sample Equity Attribution Summary PDF

S&P 500 Buybacks Fall 17.5% Year-over-Year to $133.1 Billion for Q1 2017

EDGAR Submission Header Summary. Series / Classes. Documents

S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index

Statement of Investments October 31, 2013 (Unaudited)

Fresno County Employees' Retirement Association Performance Review Summary Period Ending: March 31, 2005

Investment Portfolio Compliance Report January 31, County of Monterey. Investment Portfolio Compliance Report.

Investment Portfolio Compliance Report December 31, County of Monterey. Investment Portfolio Compliance Report.

THE ADVISORS INNER CIRCLE FUND

Global Top 100 Companies by market capitalisation

INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY REPORT ESCAMBIA

Presentation to the City of Los Angeles Treasurer on the City's General Pool Investments. April 30, 2017

Presentation to the City of Los Angeles Treasurer on the City's General Pool Investments. August 31, 2018

Ethel Hart Mutual Endowment Fund Quarterly Investment Report September 30, 2016 Q1 FY2017. Office of the City Treasurer - City of Sacramento

Cboe Options Exchange Taiwanese Trading Permit Holder Supplemental Application Form

Presentation to the City of Los Angeles Treasurer on the City's General Pool Investments. March 31, 2017

The Winners and Losers from a Stronger US Dollar

Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Funds

INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY REPORT ESCAMBIA

INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY REPORT ESCAMBIA

BMO S&P 500 Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZUE) (the ETF )

INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY REPORT

Horizons Enhanced Income US Equity (USD) ETF (HEA.U, HEA.V, HEA, HEA.A:TSX)

Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF

Revisiting Core Principles

Statement of Investments September 30, 2017 (Unaudited)

MFS BLENDED RESEARCH CORE EQUITY PORTFOLIO

Transcription:

Brad Sears Christy Mallory May 2014 Report Update: Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Non-Discrimination Policies of the Top 50 Federal Contractors and the Top 50 Fortune 500 companies, 2013 This Appendix updates the report Economic Motives for Adopting LGBT-Related Workplace Policies released by the Williams Institute in October 2011 and updated in March 2013. It provides an updated list of the top 50 federal contractors and the top 50 Fortune 500 companies that have non-discrimination policies that include sexual orientation and gender identity. The list of top contractors is based on federal procurement data reported for fiscal year 2013. 1 The top 50 Fortune companies are taken from the 2013 Fortune 500 list. As of April 2014, 86% of the top 50 federal contractors prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation, and 61% prohibited discrimination based on gender identity (Table 1). 2 Combined, the top 50 contractors represent 48% of all contracting dollars awarded by the federal government over $218 billion in spending. All but one of the top 50 Fortune 500 companies prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation (98%) as of April 2014, and 84% prohibited discrimination based on gender identity (Table 2). Overall, the percentages of top 50 federal contractors and top 50 Fortune 500 companies with sexual orientation and gender identity non-discrimination policies have increased since the Williams Institute began tracking the policies in October 2011. As of October 2011, 81% of the top 50 federal contractors prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation, and 44% prohibited discrimination based on gender identity. Among the top 50 Fortune 500 companies, 96% prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation, and 70% prohibited discrimination based on gender identity. The study was based on 2010 lists of the top federal contractors and Fortune 500 companies. The increases over time are due in part to more companies adopting these policies, and in part to a change in companies that ranked on in the top 50 on each list from 2010 to 2013. The March 2013 update, based on the top contractors and top Fortune companies in 2011, found that 90% of the top 50 federal contractors prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation, and 67% prohibited discrimination based on gender identity. Among the top 50 Fortune 500 companies in 2011, 98% prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation and 88% prohibited discrimination based on gender identity as of March 2013. The decreases in percentages between the March 2013 report and the current report are due to the change in companies that ranked in the top 50 on each list from 2011 to 2013, and not to companies rescinding policies. Among the top companies in 2011 data, one additional federal contractor (Textron) has since added gender identity to its non-discrimination policy, increasing the percentage of contractors with policies on the 2011 list to 68%. There have been no other changes to the policies of those companies since March 2013. 1

Top 50 Federal Contractors, FY 2013 % of Total Contracting Dollars Awarded Dollars Awarded (millions) Sexual Orientation Gender Identity Rank Company 1 Lockheed Martin 9.6% 44,114 X X 2 Boeing 4.6% 21,173 X X 3 Raytheon 3.0% 14,060 X X 4 General Dynamics 2.9% 13,109 X X 5 Northrop Grumman 2.2% 9,996 X X 6 SAIC 1.4% 6,302 X 7 Huntington Ingalls Industry 1.4% 6,238 X 8 L-3 Communications Holdings 1.3% 5,778 X X 9 United Technologies 1.2% 5,714 X X 10 BAE Systems 1.0% 4,838 X X 11 McKesson 1.0% 4,738 X X 12 Bechtel Group 0.9% 3,981 X 13 Veritas Capital Fund 0.8% 3,668 14 Humana 0.8% 3,495 X X 15 Computer Sciences Corporation 0.8% 3,468 X X 16 Booz Allen Hamilton 0.7% 3,194 X X 17 URS 0.7% 3,161 X 18 Health Net 0.7% 3,083 X X 19 Hewlett-Packard 0.6% 2,805 X X 20 Textron 0.6% 2,718 X X 21 General Electric 0.6% 2,539 X X 22 Babcock & Wilcox 0.5% 2,501 X 23 Exelis 0.5% 2,494 24 Harris 0.5% 2,261 X X 25 Fluor 0.5% 2,225 X 26 General Atomic Technologies 0.5% 2,156 27 Battelle Memorial Institute 0.5% 2,120 X 28 CACI International 0.5% 2,106 X 29 Bell Boeing Joint Project a 0.5% 2,096 - - Bell Helicopter (Textron Inc.) - - The Boeing Co. - - 30 Los Alamos National Security LLC a 0.4% 2,030 X X 31 Supreme Group 0.4% 2,028 X 32 Honeywell International 0.4% 1,927 X X 2

33 Triwest Healthcare Alliance 0.4% 1,850 34 Oshkosh 0.4% 1,733 X X 35 California Institute of Technology 0.4% 1,716 X X 36 Sierra Nevada Corporation 0.3% 1,573 37 United Launch Alliance 0.3% 1,558 X 38 Alliant Techsystems 0.3% 1,519 X X 39 Jacobs Engineering 0.3% 1,514 X X 40 Amerisourcebergen 0.3% 1,465 X X 41 Lawrence Livermore National Security 0.3% 1,449 X X 42 Merck & Co. 0.3% 1,440 X X 43 Mantech International 0.3% 1,419 X X 44 Coins n Things 0.3% 1,417 45 Refinery Associates of Texas 0.3% 1,340 46 United Healthgroup 0.3% 1,307 X X 47 IBM 0.3% 1,235 X X 48 UT-Battelle a 0.3% 1,204 - - University of Tennessee X Battelle Memorial Inst. - - 49 Mitre 0.3% 1,889 X 50 Cardinal Health 0.3% 1,176 X X TOTAL 47.7% b 218,220 b 42 30 a Contractor is a partnership that consists of two or more companies and does not have its own distinct non-discrimination policy. The companies in the partnership are listed directly under the partnership name. A policy is only listed for an individual company within the partnership if the company does not appear elsewhere on this list. b Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding. 3

Table 2: Top 50 Fortune 500 Companies, 2013 Rank Company Sexual Orientation Gender Identity 1 Wal-Mart Stores X X 2 Exxon Mobil 3 Chevron X X 4 Phillips 66 X 5 Berkshire Hathaway X 6 Apple X X 7 General Motors X X 8 General Electric X X 9 Valero Energy X 10 Ford Motor X X 11 AT&T X X 12 Fannie Mae X X 13 CVS Caremark X X 14 McKesson X X 15 Hewlett-Packard X X 16 Verizon Communications X X 17 United Health Group X X 18 J.P. Morgan Chase X X 19 Cardinal Health X X 20 IBM X X 21 Bank of America X X 22 Costco X X 23 Kroger X X 24 Express Scripts Holding X X 25 Wells Fargo X X 26 Citigroup X X 27 Archer Daniels Midland X 28 Procter & Gamble X X 29 Prudential Financial X X 30 Boeing X X 31 Freddie Mac X X 32 Amerisourcebergen X X 33 Marathon Petroleum X 34 Home Depot X X 35 Microsoft X X 36 Target X X 37 Walgreen X X 38 AIG X X 39 INTL FCStone X 40 MetLife X X 41 Johnson & Johnson X X 42 Caterpillar X X 4

43 PepsiCo X X 44 State Farm Insurance X X 45 ConocoPhillips X 46 Comcast X X 47 WellPoint X X 48 Pfizer X X 49 Amazon.com X X 50 United Technologies X X TOTAL 49 42 Endnotes 1 Federal Procurement Data System Next Generation, Top 100 Contractors Report, https://www.fpds.gov/fpdsng_cms/index.php/en/reports/62-top-100-contractors-report. 2 Percentages are based on number of federal contractors with the policies out of a total of 49 contractors. The total number of contractors is 49 rather than 50 because only unique entities were counted. This means that if a contractor is made up of a partnership, those partners who were otherwise represented in the list were not counted again (for example, Boeing is a partner in the Bell-Boeing Joint Project, but also appears separately on the federal contractor list). Each partner not otherwise represented in the list was counted as an individual contractor. 5