the Home of International Arbitration

Similar documents
International Commercial Arbitration - An Introduction. Steven Lim Managing Partner, Singapore, Nabarro LLP 12 October 2016

Legal Business. Arbitration As A Method Of Dispute Resolution

1. Ad hoc and institutional arbitration in Italy

4. Drafting arbitration clauses

WELCOME TO OUR WEBINAR International Arbitration Clauses for Franchise Agreements

Bun & Associates ATTORNEYS AT LAW INTRODUCTORY GUIDE. Commercial Arbitration in Cambodia. Arbitration

Your Arbitration Agreement Matters: Tips for Drafting Effective Arbitration Clauses in the U.S. Andrew Behrman February 2017

Could London be the easiest place to settle your clients disputes?

Finnish Arbitration Act (23 October 1992/967)

International sale of goods and arbitration in Europe

Arbitration Provisions in M&A Transaction Documents

ST/SG/AC.8/2001/CRP.15

INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION

10th Anniversary Edition The Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook. Myanmar

RESOLVING COMPLEX INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES USE OF THE ENGLISH JURISDICTION FOR EFFECTIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Andrew Manning Cox

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID)

WIPO LIST OF NEUTRALS BIOGRAPHICAL DATA

In the matter of an arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. between

INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION - THE ESSENTIALS.

Introducing ICSID. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. The global leader in international investment dispute settlement

Swiss Arbitration Association Association Suisse de l`arbitrage. Arbitration in (and around) Switzerland

BEST PRACTICES IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION. Summary of Contents

NEWS. Mixed messages: developments in recognition of foreign arbitral awards in Russia

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION COURT REGULATION "ON THE PROCEDURE OF ORGANIZATION AND CONDUCT OF "AD HOC" ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS"

Appointment of the arbitrators in multiparty arbitrations. Michelangelo Cicogna De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani

60 YEARS OF THE NEW YORK CONVENTION: LESSONS LEARNT. Khawar Qureshi QC 20 March 2018 Qatar

Role of the State on Protecting the System of Arbitration

Why Finland Should Adopt the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration Christopher R. Seppälä

UNIFORM ACT ON ARBITRATION

International Arbitration: What it is and how it works. Outline of lecture

2 IN-HOUSE COUNSEL PRACTICAL GUIDE 3

FRANCHISING DISPUTES IN INDIA CHOICES DICTATE THE CONSEQUENCES

DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN SCANDINAVIA

CURRENT COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PRACTICE AND DEVELOPMENTS IN KENYA AND EAST AFRICA

THE EVOLUTION OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION

FINANCIER 10QUESTIONS NEW YORK AS A LEADING ARBITRATION CENTRE EDNA SUSSMAN, ESQ. JULY 2013 R E P R I N T F I N A N C I E R W O R L D W I D E.

International Arbitration

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID)

ARBITRATION OF INTERNATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES

Article 7 - Definition and form of arbitration agreement. Article 8 - Arbitration agreement and substantive claim before court

RULES OF ARBITRATION OF AMCHAM PERU (In force from September 1, 2008)

Arbitration procedures and practice in Japan: overview

Institutional vs. ad hoc arbitration: when and why?

The New French Arbitration Law: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back?

Preparing for ASEAN Economic Integration

ANATOMY OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION. E. Y. Park Co-Head, International Arbitration & Litigation Group Kim & Chang 12 February 2018

International Commercial Arbitration

Vision: To be the preferred ADR choice in the region by Mission:

Finnish Arbitration Act in light of the Model Law

Session 5: Why Arbitrate in Hong Kong?

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY AND THE REPUBLIC OF THE SUDAN CONCERNING THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION (AMENDMENT) ACT, KEY CHANGES AND CIRCUMSTANCES LEADING TO THE AMENDMENTS

Introduction to Arbitration and Dispute Resolution under FIDIC. Dr. Asanga Gunawansa Attorney-at-Law

Proposed Palestinian Law on International Commercial Arbitration

Party Autonomy and Choice of Law

Unauthorized Amiable Compositeur?

Arbitration for disputes with companies from Taiwan

Comparison between SCC arbitration and CIETAC arbitration

Arbitration Newsletter

ASEAN Law Association

GUIDE TO MEMBERSHIP IN THE ICSID CONVENTION

Current Issues in International Commercial and Investment Arbitration

Arbitration Article An alternative, cheaper and quicker way of dispute resolution

Managing political and commercial risks by means of arbitration & White & Case. 4 th Managing Risk in Africa Dr. Markus Burianski, Mark Goodrich

Yugraneft v. Rexx Management: Limitation periods under the New York Convention A Case Comment by Paul M. Lalonde & Mark Hines*

ARBITRATION ACT 2005 REVISED 2011 REGIONAL RESOLUTION GLOBAL SOLUTION

60 TH UIA CONGRESS BUDAPEST/HUNGARY - OCTOBER 28 - NOVEMBER 1, 2016

The Effect of Sanctions on Arbitration: Alternative Venues

10th Anniversary Edition The Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook. Kazakhstan

LAUNCHING YOUR ARBITRATION

NEWS. The settlement deficit in arbitration

ARBITRATION ACT. May 29, 2016>

ARBITRATION IN ARGENTINA. By Marcelo Cippitelli and Sergio Villamayor Alemán, CMS

CASE STUDY: INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION FRAMEWORK AND PRACTICE IN TURKEY by BENNAR AYDOĞDU 1

The Emergency and its Arbitrator Efficient or Illusion? Kiev Arbitration Days 3 November 2017 James Castello

Netherlands Arbitration Institute

Pranav Mago Head (South Asia)

A Guide to Arbitration in the Cayman Islands

Enforcement of international arbitral awards in Islamic Republic of Iran

CHOOSE COPENHAGEN AS VENUE AND PLACE OF ARBITRATION

Arthur X. DONG. Partner, AnJie Law Firm. CONTACT INFORMATION Direct: Fax:

Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Legal Acts. THE LAW OF UKRAINE ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION

Review of The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration by Margaret L. Moses

Georgian International Arbitration Centre

INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - PALESTINE

International arbitration: Corporate attitudes and practices 2006

Regional competition for the international shipping center: the development of maritime arbitration center in Asia

MIAC 2014 THE THIRD BIENNIAL MAURITIUS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE. The Litmus Test: Challenges to Awards and. Enforcement of Awards in Africa

Arbitration Law no. 31 of 2001

Henry Burnett (Harry)

GALVEZ PASCUAL UNDISPUTEDLY, YOUR LITIGATION FIRM L I T I G A T I O N A R B I T R A T I O N

Session 3: Challenges and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in Asia

10th Anniversary Edition The Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook. Vietnam

Challenges and Considerations

Keys to Achieving Efficiency in International Arbitration

Prevention & Management of ISDS

PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION ARBITRATION RULES 2012

AN ACT STATEMENT OF MOTIVES

ARBITRATOR S GUIDELINES

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF CHILE AND THE REPUBLIC OF TUNISIA ON THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

Transcription:

PARI

N Le Méridien de Paris PARI Arbitration is now established as the preferred international dispute settlement mechanism, ranging from private commercial arbitrations to investment arbitrations involving states and private entities. Among all international arbitration centres, Paris uniquely satisfies the criteria that define a legally secure and user friendly seat for international arbitration.

Le Méridien de Paris PARI N 2 21 6.58 E 2.351828 Choosing a seat of arbitration is important for many reasons: The arbitral process should be as rapid and efficient as possible. There should be minimum intervention by the courts at the seat, except in a supporting role. The law of the seat determines the extent to which the courts there can intervene in the arbitral process: some laws provide that courts may intervene only in support of arbitration; in contrast, other laws may permit courts to interfere or even to hinder the arbitral process. A place of arbitration must respond to the needs of the business community and the users of international arbitration: Therefore one should always choose a seat of arbitration in a country : > whose laws favour arbitration and whose courts actively support, rather than interfere with, the arbitral process; > that respects the parties' intentions regarding their choice of procedure and applicable law; Awards should be binding on the parties and internationally enforceable; they should not be subject to any challenges that entail reopening the merits of the dispute. The seat of the arbitration will be the place where the award is deemed to have been made. The law of the seat will therefore determine the grounds on which an award can be challenged before the local courts; such grounds may be limited or, on the contrary, they may allow broad challenges that may even amount to a reopening of the merits of the dispute. > that has the required professional and structural resources for a rapid, legally secure and efficient process; > that is a signatory of the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. The law of the seat will also determine whether any challenge to an award will be resolved quickly and cost-effectively, or can become a drawn-out and expensive process.

Le Méridien de Paris PARI Choosing Paris as a place of arbitration Paris is a unique transnational forum. w w w. p a r N i s a r b i provides the benefit of French arbitration law and access to French courts that have, for over 50 years, given their unfailing support to international arbitration. t r a t i o n. c o m ince the 1960s, French law has been at the forefront of the development of international arbitration. It allows the parties complete freedom to organize their arbitration, subject only to internationally recognized minimum standards of due process. Parties are totally free to conduct their arbitration in the language they wish, applying rules and laws of their choice, with arbitrators of their choice. The arbitration case law is clear and well established. It has been supportive for decades and provides the parties with legal certainty that their agreement to arbitrate will be enforced. The Paris civil court (Tribunal de Grande Instance) includes a specialized judge who, in the rare event judicial intervention in support of arbitration is required, hears all applications relating to the appointment of arbitrators and the implementation of the arbitral proceedings, and who actively supports the arbitral process. French courts are prohibited from intervening in any dispute where an arbitration clause may apply. Arbitrators have priority to decide on their own jurisdiction. Accordingly, French courts do not interfere before or during the proceedings. In the event an award is challenged, French courts will not review the merits of the case. They will limit themselves to verifying the existence of a valid arbitration agreement and ensuring that the arbitral proceedings complied with principles of due process. A specialized and experienced section in the Paris Court of Appeal deals expeditiously with all proceedings relating to international arbitration, avoiding lengthy hearings that can increase the cost of arbitration. ince the enactment of the current French arbitration law in 1981, hundreds of decisions rendered by the Paris Court of Appeal and the French upreme Court (Cour de cassation) on international arbitration have been published and commented. Courts and arbitration laws in many other countries have followed the French courts and have adopted similar principles (such as the arbitrators' priority to determine their own jurisdiction; the rule that an arbitration clause is valid, even if the contract in which it is included is deemed null (separability); the arbitrability of matters relating to public policy; the recognition of the principle of estoppel; and the prohibition for a foreign tate to renege on its commitment to arbitrate). For over a century, Paris has hosted many thousands of international arbitrations, many of which have no links with France. These arbitrations take place in many different languages, under any number of laws and involve almost all industries and subject matters: construction and engineering, major infrastructure projects, investment protection, energy and natural resources, transnational M & A, international sales, aeronautics and space, IP and IT, insurance and reinsurance, transport, etc. Arbitrations in Paris take place under a wide variety of rules including: > Ad hoc, with or without UNCITRAL Rules; > Institutional arbitrations under ICC, ICDR, LCIA, wiss Rules, AFA, CMAP, CAMP rules and many others; > Investment arbitrations, including ICID arbitrations, which frequently take place at the World Bank's European headquarters in Paris. Uniquely among major international arbitration centres, Paris is home to a multinational community of several hundred legal professionals, dedicated to the practice of international arbitration. This includes practicing lawyers of numerous nationalities within the specialised arbitration practices of the world's leading arbitration law firms and leading academics, who are international opinion-leaders in the field. Paris is the seat of the ICC s International Court of Arbitration, composed of representatives of 90 countries who gather every month. As a result, Paris offers parties wishing to use international arbitration access to a pool of resources including arbitrators, counsel, legal experts, and translators of all nationalities who are able to translate proceedings in virtually any language. Last but by no means least, Paris is one of the world's best-equipped capital cities to host international arbitrations, with many of the world's leading hotels and first class conference facilities at which to hold hearings, including a dedicated arbitration hearing centre. It is a major hub providing excellent air travel connections with all continents. Last but by no means least, Paris is one of the world's best-equipped capital cities to host international arbitrations. 2 21 6.58 E 2.351828

PARI 73 boulevard Haussmann 75008 Paris contact@parisarbitration.com www.parisarbitration.com Photographer: A. Frich