overview FACT SHEET trans-pacific partnership TPP

Similar documents
JAPAN BRUNEI DARUSSALAM AUSTRALIA

Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade

Pre-Hearing Statement of Linda M. Dempsey, Vice President, International Economic Affairs, National Association of Manufacturers

Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. National Interest Analysis

BRIEFING ON The TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (TPPA)

ENHANCING TRADE AND INVESTMENT, SUPPORTING JOBS, ECONOMIC GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT: OUTLINES OF THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

Emeritus Professor Dr Zakariah Abdul Rashid. Executive Director Malaysian Institute of Economic Research

EU Trade Policy and CETA

International treaty examination of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP)

TPP11 Agreement in Principle: Japan s Role in Mega-regional Trade Agreements

Summary of negotiating objectives

Thailand and TPP 30 November 2012 Apiradi Tantraporn, Executive Chairperson The International Institute for Asia Pacific Studies (INSAPS), Bangkok

Economic Impact of Canada s Participation in the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership

SUBMISSION TO THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE PROPOSED NEW ZEALAND/EUROPEAN UNION FREE TRADE AGREEMENT FEBRUARY 2016

What is TPP? Trans-Pacific Partnership TPP

FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS ANALYSIS

National Interest Analysis

Navigating the Trans- Pacific Partnership

The Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)

Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership

Trans-Pacific Partnership

Guide to the. EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement and Investment Protection Agreement. April 2018

AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE ASEAN AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND FREE TRADE AREA (and associated instruments) NATIONAL INTEREST ANALYSIS

Navigating the Trans- Pacific Partnership

Elephants in a bazaar?

Trans-Pacific Partnership

The Trans-Pacific Partnership:

Japan s New Trade Policy in Asia-Pacific

CFRED The Trans Pacific Partnership Impact and Implications. Assessing the content from a business perspective

Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties inquiry to the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement March 2016

Services Trade: Essential Fuel for U.S. and Global Economic Growth

Event 1. Module 2. The Converging Strands Between Trade and Investment Session Two: The mega regionals, impacts for members and non-members

Economic Impact of Canada s Potential Participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

Japan s FTA Strategy. August 7, Shujiro URATA Waseda University

Electronic Communications Convention as enabling cross-border paperless trade

A Health Impact Assessment of the Trans- Pacific Partnership Agreement: Few Gains, Many Risks

2005/FTA-RTA/WKSP/010a Peru s FTAs/RTAs

A new EU trade agreement with Japan

NEW ZEALAND MALAYSIA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT

The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Maryland. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Maryland. Jobs Exports Investment

Presentation by Economy Under Review - Chile

Impact of the Trans Pacific Partnership to Indonesia

Trans- Paci*ic Partnership

International Trade Agreements and Emerging Markets

Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for North Carolina. Jobs Exports Investment

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BILATERAL AND REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS

NUMBER: November TPP11 and RCEP Compared

Report of the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee

The problems occur when products arrive that haven t been tested in accredited labs so we have no idea about the validity of the test results that

POLICY BRIEF. TPP11: Unpacking the Suspended Provisions. Going from 12 to 11 Parties. No Changes in Most Chapters. NUMBER: November 2017

Strategic benefits Building bridges, shaping globalisation

Current Status and Future Prospects of the TPP Negotiations

The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Colorado. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Colorado. Jobs Exports Investment

TPP, RCEP and Prospects for Eventual Convergence Robert Scollay NZPECC and APEC Study Centre, University of Auckland

The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Indiana. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Indiana. Jobs Exports Investment

AdvantageBC. September 19, Don Campbell

ANZ Submission to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade White Paper Public Consultation

Co-operation in IPR: Perspectives from ASEAN

Comments in Response to Executive Order Regarding Trade Agreements Violations and Abuses Docket No. USTR

Impacts of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans- Pacific Partnership on the New Zealand Economy

TRADE BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES

A TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Kentucky. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Kentucky. Jobs Exports Investment 52%

ON: Negotiating Objectives for a U.S.-European Union Trade Agreement. TO: Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. BY: U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Presented by Bob Sacco, GTA Trade & Customs Leader

49,000 46% 55. The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for South Dakota. Overview. What Is the TPP?

Shankaran Nambiar. Senior Research Fellow. Malaysian Institute of Economic Research. Malaysian Institute of Economic Research

A TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Vermont. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Vermont. Jobs Exports Investment 57%

The TransPacific Partnership (TPP) is a regional trade agreement being negotiated

Regional Initiatives. Unveiling the Trans-Pacific Partnership: An Analysis of the Full Text. Y. Dong, Q. Su

The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Delaware. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Delaware. Jobs Exports Investment

Pascal Kerneis Managing Director ESF (European Services Forum)

WASHINGTON STATE TRADE WITH TRANSPACIFIC PARTNERS

Professor the Hon. Stephen Martin Chief Executive, CEDA

Study of Regional and Bilateral Agreements by the Productivity Commission. Analysis of Recent Developments Commissioned and reviewed by the BCA

The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Vermont. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Vermont. Jobs Exports Investment

India s Trade Policy and Global Trade Initiatives

Briefing paper for the Australia-Indonesia Business Partnership Group (IA-BPG), June 2016

*** DRAFT RECOMMENDATION

MINERALS COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA SUBMISSION TO DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE ON PROPOSED PACIFIC ALLIANCE FREE TRADE AGREEMENT

The Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement

Stockholm Seminar on Japan what is the agreement in principle?"

BUSINESSEUROPE POSITION ON THE EU-KOREA FREE-TRADE AGREEMENT (FTA)

Increasing Productivity and Competitiveness through Trade (EU-Japan FTA/EPA, TPP) June 2014 Jun ARIMA Director General, JETRO London

Japan, the US and TPP-11: Where do we go from here?

WHAT DO AMERICANS THINK ABOUT FREE TRADE?

Productivity Commission Study into Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements. ANZ Submission

Mega-Regional Trading Arrangements: TPP and TTIP - how China and other emerging economy react to the new rules governing the trade and investment?

Division on Investment and Enterprise

The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Maine. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Maine. Jobs Exports Investment

15.6 M 45% 17,770. The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for the United States. Overview. What Is the TPP?

RIETI Special Seminar. The New Landscape of World Trade with Mega-FTAs and Japan's Strategy. Handout. URATA Shujiro

Our position. Towards a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between the EU and Indonesia

OVERLOOKED FACTS ABOUT

Economic Integration in South East Asia and the Impact on the EU

Associate Professor, Dr Pham Thi Hong Yen Central Economic Commission Viet Nam

USCIB Comments on Negotiating Objectives Regarding U.S.-Japan Trade Agreement December 19, 2018

FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC COOPERATION BETWEEN THE ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH EAST ASIAN NATIONS AND THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

A TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Oklahoma. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Oklahoma. Jobs Exports Investment 53%

The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Delaware. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Delaware. Jobs Exports Investment

Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) Services and Investment Unit, Trade Negotiations Division Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade

Transcription:

CANADA JAPAN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MEXICO VIET NAM BRUNEI MALAYSIA SINGAPORE PERU AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND CHILE trans-pacific partnership overview FACT SHEET will give New Zealand better access to globally significant markets. It will diversify New Zealand s trade and investment relationships, and provide a platform to build on the NZ$20 billion of New Zealand goods and NZ$8 billion of New Zealand services exported to countries in 2014. is estimated to add at least $2.7 billion a year to New Zealand s GDP by 2030. will require some changes for New Zealand that will incur costs. These costs will be significantly less than the benefits will provide for New Zealand. 1

The Trans-Pacific Partnership () is a free trade agreement that will liberalise trade and investment between 12 Pacific-rim countries: New Zealand, Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, Singapore, the United States and Viet Nam. New Zealand s future is as a trading nation. will help support that by setting a new standard for trade and investment in the Asia Pacific region, generating substantial long-term economic and strategic benefits for New Zealand. The agreement will deepen economic ties between its members by opening up trade in goods and services, boosting investment flows, and promoting closer links across a range of economic policy and regulatory issues. Enhanced coherence in processes and regulations that govern global supply chains will streamline international trade, providing benefits for businesses and consumers. Over time, will help remove unnecessary duplication, reduce costs, and foster greater business opportunities. will be open to future expansion. It provides a platform for wider, regional economic integration, and supports the foundation for a free trade agreement of the Asia Pacific. This gives New Zealand the opportunity to shape future trade liberalisation in the Asia Pacific region and promote the growth of regional supply chains. Reflecting the role New Zealand has played throughout the negotiation, New Zealand will act as the formal depositary of. The region The 12 Parties collectively constitute approximately 36 percent of world GDP worth a total of US$28 trillion. New Zealand has a strong footprint in the region. Parties: are the destination for 40 percent of New Zealand s goods exports (NZ$20 billion in 2014) and 47 percent of New Zealand s services exports (NZ$8 billion in 2014); are the home to around 73 percent of New Zealand s total overseas direct investment in 2014. 75 percent of the total foreign direct investment (FDI) in New Zealand was sourced from countries in 2014; include five of New Zealand s top 10 trading partners (Australia, the US, Japan, Singapore, and Malaysia). will be New Zealand s first FTA with the United States, Japan, Canada, Mexico and Peru. Over NZ$12 billion of New Zealand goods and services are currently exported to these five countries. New Zealand has existing FTAs with the other six Parties and bolsters and strengthens these agreements. Exports from New Zealand to new FTA partners 2

Benefits and implications for New Zealand Economic benefits Economic modelling commissioned by the Government estimates that once fully in effect, would add at least $2.7 billion a year to New Zealand s GDP by 2030. Goods market access New Zealand exporters will benefit from comprehensive tariff liberalisation, creating new trade opportunities and helping New Zealand exporters to build regional supply chains. Tariffs will be eliminated on 93% of New Zealand s trade with these new FTA partners, once is fully phased in, saving New Zealand exporters $NZ259 million each year. Over 50% of these savings will accrue immediately when comes into force. will open up new market opportunities, and ensure a level playing field for our exporters in markets where competitors have enjoyed tariff preference. This will help grow New Zealand s volume of trade. will also eliminate agricultural export subsidies in the region and establish more predictable, transparent rules for exporters when their goods are being sent to export markets, which can generate considerable savings to businesses. The new trading market opportunities under will provide significant potential to lift the export performance and productivity of the Māori asset base, currently worth $42.6 billion, of which a significant portion is oriented towards New Zealand s export economy. See Goods Market Access factsheet. Services and Government Procurement New Zealand sold NZ$8.3 billion of services to countries in 2014 services like tourism, education, IT, consulting, engineering, accounting and other professional services. This trade will grow under, with chapters on cross-border services, temporary entry for business people, financial services, telecommunicatons and e-commerce reducing barriers to trade in many sectors. also includes provisions that will help ensure New Zealand services exporters are not discriminated against in the future (compared to competitors from other countries) and will automatically benefit from future domestic reforms by Parties that liberalise trade in countries (subject to certain exceptions). New Zealand businesses will also secure equal treatment for many government procurement contracts within the Parties, including in a number of markets which currently restrict participation by New Zealand suppliers. See Market Access for Services and Investment factsheet, and Government Procurement factsheet. 3

Sector NZ exports to region in 2014 Estimated yearly tariff savings when is fully implemented Meat NZ$2.3b NZ$72m Dairy NZ$4.6b NZ$102m Fruit and vegetables NZ$1.2b NZ$26m Wine NZ$839m NZ$10m Forestry NZ$1.5b NZ$9m Fish and fish products NZ$564m NZ$8m Wool, leather and textiles NZ$621m NZ$4m Manufactured goods NZ$7.0b NZ$10m Other agricultural goods NZ$1.6b NZ$18m Investment and ISDS will improve access and protection for New Zealand investors and investments in the region. It will promote increased investment in New Zealand by investors from countries and reinforce New Zealand s attractiveness as a stable investment destination. Greater investment will promote innovation, economic growth and development, and support the creation and retention of jobs. includes an Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism. The mechanism applies only to investment provisions and will help protect New Zealand investors abroad while safeguarding the Government s ability to regulate for legitimate public policy purposes. will include more safeguards than any previous New Zealand FTA, including a provision that allows the Government to rule out ISDS challenges over tobacco control measures. Consistent with CER and the Australia-ASEAN-New Zealand FTA, s ISDS provisions will not apply between New Zealand and Australia. See Investment and ISDS factsheet. Intellectual property contains an intellectual property chapter that will further harmonise intellectual property (IP) standards across the region. Enforcement standards will also help New Zealand businesses protect their IP in markets. The outcomes on geographical indications should help preserve access for New Zealand s exports that use generic names. In several areas, however, the IP rules differ from New Zealand s preferred approach, and will require some changes to New Zealand law and some costs. These costs are significantly outweighed by the benefits of. Extending copyright from 50 to 70 years would delay when works enter the public domain, with a cost to consumers and businesses that increases gradually over 20 years and averages around $55 million a year over the very long term. New Zealand has also agreed to a number of new obligations relating to pharmaceuticals, including patent term extension in certain circumstances (to compensate for any unreasonable patent office and marketing approval delays) and patent linkage. These provisions have been designed in a way that minimises 4

the impact on New Zealand, including outcomes that mean very few unreasonable delays are expected and only in exceptional circumstances. The outcome on data protection for pharmaceuticals (including biological pharmaceuticals) can be met within New Zealand s current policy settings and practice. New Zealand law provides five years of data protection for small molecule and biological pharmaceuticals (also known as biologics). requires New Zealand to continue to provide five years of data protection for small molecule pharmaceuticals. For biologics, New Zealand will be required to provide the five years of data protection together with further effective market protection through other measures, taking into account local market circumstances. These can be met within existing policy settings and practice. would also require Parties to provide 5 years data protection to new pharmaceutical products that contain a new and a previously approved active ingredient. This is consistent with New Zealand s current law. also includes a requirement for New Zealand to within three years of entry into force of either accede to the most recent 1991 version of the International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV 91), or alternatively, under a New Zealand specific approach, implement a plant variety rights system that gives effect to UPOV 91. When implementing this obligation, New Zealand is able to adopt any measure that it deems necessary to protect indigenous plant species in fulfilment of its obligations under the Treaty of Waitangi (and this is not subject to the dispute settlement provisions in ). See Intellectual Property factsheet. PHARMAC contains an annex on transparency and procedural fairness for pharmaceutical products and medical devices. This will require PHARMAC to make some administrative changes to increase transparency, but the new processes do not change the PHARMAC model or its ability to prioritise its spending and negotiate with suppliers. The provisions are not subject to dispute settlement and medical devices are excluded from the scope of obligations for New Zealand. See Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Purchasing (Reimbursement) factsheet. State owned enterprises sets rules to ensure commercially focussed stateowned enterprises (SOEs) and designated monopolies operate on a level playing field with private competitors something New Zealand s commercially focussed SOEs already do. This will make it easier for many New Zealand businesses to compete in countries, with minimal impact in New Zealand. The provisions would not apply to Fonterra, Pharmac or Zespri or to entities such as district health boards and crown research institutes. See State Owned Enterprises and Designated Monopolies factsheet. Labour and environment contains labour and environment chapters that will promote sustainable development and achieve higher levels of environmental and labour standards protection in the region. Underpinning both chapters is an understanding that trade agreements should reinforce and not undermine fundamental labour rights and environmental laws, and that labour and environmental rules should not be used as barriers to trade. See Labour and Environment factsheet. Legal and institutional Provisions in safeguard New Zealand s ability to make policy in important areas like health, environment, taxation policy and national security. A specific exception recognises the importance of the Treaty of Waitangi to New Zealand, in addition to policy flexibility preserved across key areas in. As a result, nothing in will prevent the Crown from taking measures that it deems necessary to meet its obligations to Māori, including under the Treaty of Waitangi. Further, New Zealand s interpretation of the Treaty of Waitangi shall not be subject to the dispute settlement provisions of. See Legal and Institutional factsheet. 5

Next steps The text needs to be legally verified, a process which involves confirming technical drafting. New Zealand supports the release of the text before it is signed by governments but arrangements are yet to be finalised. Like any free trade agreement, once the Government has approved and signed the agreement, will go through the Parliamentary treaty examination process. As part of this process, the final text, together with a National Interest Analysis, will be presented to Parliament for examination by the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Select Committee. During this time, the public will be invited to make submissions as part of the consultation process. Once this examination process is complete, legislative changes required to implement obligations will need to go through normal Parliamentary procedures, which include select committee scrutiny and passage of legislation by Parliament. Only once these steps have been completed and legislation has been passed will the Executive take binding treaty action. The agreement s entry-into-force provisions mean that New Zealand and other parties will have two years to complete domestic approval, legislative and ratification procedures. At that time may be brought into effect by all Parties, though other procedures have been agreed if some Parties require more time to complete domestic steps. 6