Mosaic Solar Loan Trust

Similar documents
Mosaic Solar Loan Trust

MANULIFE VERIFICATION LETTER FOR THE CLIMATE BONDS STANDARD SOLAR, WIND

MOSAIC SOLAR GREEN USE OF PROCEEDS SECURITIZED BOND

Type of Engagement: Annual Review Date: 24 October 2018 Engagement Leader: Marion Oliver,

Dividend Solar Green Use of Proceeds Securitized Bonds $104,664,000 Dividend Solar Loan Backed Notes, Series

DNB Boligkreditt. Scope and Objectives

RENOVATE AMERICA GREEN BOND PRE-ISSUANCE REVIEW

NAFIN S ANNUAL GREEN BOND REPORT

KBC. Scope and Objectives

NEW YORK STATE HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY CLIMATE BOND LOW CARBON BUILDINGS CRITERIA OF THE CLIMATE BONDS STANDARD VERIFICATION LETTER

Société du Grand Paris

SINDICATUM RENEWABLE ENERGY COMPANY GREEN BOND

RENOVATE AMERICA GREEN BOND

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO TRANSBAY TRANSIT CENTER VERIFICATION LETTER FOR THE CLIMATE BONDS STANDARD LOW CARBON LAND TRANSPORT

Framework Overview and Second Party Opinion Mitsubishi UFJ Lease and Finance Green Bond

NAFIN S ANNUAL GREEN BOND REPORT

DIVIDEND SOLAR GREEN USE OF PROCEEDS SECURITIZED BONDS

AMERICAN MUNICIPAL POWER, INC. COMBINED HYDROELECTRIC PROJECTS REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2016A (GREEN BONDS)

BANCO DEL ESTADO DE CHILE SOCIAL BOND FRAMEWORK

Framework Overview and Second-Party Opinion Japan Excellent, Inc. Green Bond

Second-Party Opinion EDP Green Bond The Framework applies to issuances by EDP Energias de Portugal S.A. and EDP Finance BV.

MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP GREEN BOND

Second-Party Opinion Pepper Group Green Bond

Second-Party Opinion Commerzbank Green Bond

Second-Party Opinion Bancóldex Social Bond Framework

CLIMATE BONDS STANDARD VERIFICATION LETTER

Framework Overview and Second-Party Opinion Mitsubishi Estate Green Bond

QBE INSURANCE GROUP GREEN BOND

Second-Party Opinion Korea East-West Power Co. Ltd Sustainability Bond

ICO SOCIAL BOND LOAN PORTFOLIO REVIEW

Second-Party Opinion EUROFIMA Green Bond

Second-Party Opinion Citi Green Bond

RENOVATE AMERICA GREEN USE OF PROCEEDS SECURITIZED BOND

BNG BANK SUSTAINABILITY BOND

Second-Party Opinion Banco Atlántida Green Bond

Second-Party Opinion Lotte Property & Development Sustainability Bond

Framework Overview and Second-Party Opinion Invesco Office J-REIT Green Bond

Second Party Opinion ANZ Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Bond

Green Bond Second Opinion

GREEN STORM 2017 OBVION

PRE-ISSUANCE VERIFICATION STATEMENT (ASSURANCE REPORT)

MANULIFE GREEN BOND FRAMEWORK

Evaluation Summary. Alignment with the Green Bond Principles 2017

AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK SOCIAL BOND

VALIDATION REPORT BELECTRIC SOLAR LTD.

BNG BANK 2017 SUSTAINABILITY BOND FRAMEWORK

Washington, D.C. SREC Market Update. July 8, 2018

Austrian Climate Change Workshop March 2017

Climate Bonds Standard Version 3.0

Green Bond Principles, 2014 Voluntary Process Guidelines for Issuing Green Bonds

Fundamentals of Sustainable and Responsible Investment. The World Bank Washington DC May 20, :30 am 11:30 am

Financing renewable energy projects Takeaways from other markets

Connecticut Green Bank Organization Fact Sheet

VALIDATION REPORT BELECTRIC SOLAR LTD.

ESG Spotlight. Strengthening corporate governance in the Japanese market 24 April Key Insights. Corporate governance and economic growth

Green Bond Framework. for. Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P., related co-investment ventures and other affiliates (together, Prologis )

ESG Investing: Research & Benchmarks. Thomas Kuh, PhD Executive Director and Global Head of ESG Indexes, MSCI

Framework Overview and Second-Party Opinion Daiwa Securities Group Green Bond

Framework Overview and Second-Party Opinion Activia Properties Inc. Green Bond

REPORT OF FACTUAL FINDINGS (AGREED-UPON PROCEDURE)

Green Bond Framework

Estimated Cost per Watt Methodology

Estimated Cost per Watt Methodology

REPORT OF FACTUAL FINDINGS (AGREED-UPON PROCEDURE)

Investing in the Sun with Vivint Solar. Q Financial Results

Green Bonds Assessment (GBA) Proposed Approach and Methodology

Dominion Energy Virginia

NEWS RELEASE Oct 5, 2018

PRE-ISSUANCE VERIFIER S REPORT (REPORT OF FACTUAL FINDINGS, AGREED-UPON PROCEDURE)

Investing in the Sun with Vivint Solar. Q Financial Results

New Jersey SREC Update. November 22, 2017

VALIDATION REPORT BELECTRIC SOLAR LTD.

Green Impact Report. Formosa 1. Introduction. Green Impact: Forecast GIG CARBON RATING: AAA

Rating Action: Moody's announces rating actions on student loan ABS backed by FFELP student loans following the update of its rating methodology

Green Bond / Green Bond Programme. External Review Form

FOR PROFESSIONAL CLIENTS ONLY. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) investment policies

DNB Boligkreditt. May 2018

How the TCFD recommendations are incorporated into FTSE Russell s ESG Ratings and data model

ISSUING REGISTERED WARRANTS Policy 522

BNG BANK SUSTAINABILITY BOND 2016

15 USC 78o-11. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

ABS Research Clearing the Air Addressing Three Misconceptions of PACE

Guide to green bonds on the Bloomberg Terminal

Building the future of energy, today. INVESTOR OVERVIEW // SEPTEMBER 2018

RMBS Commentary: RMBS Landscape

Columbia Threadneedle Investments Launches Columbia U.S. Social Bond Fund

MSCI ESG FUND METRICS METHODOLOGY

REPORT OF FACTUAL FINDINGS (AGREED-UPON PROCEDURE)

QBE Gender Equality Bond Annual Review 2018

Stripped Mortgage-Backed Securities (Backed by Fannie Mae Issued Pooled Certificates)

Green Bond Framework

(JRF Green Bond) Japan Retail Fund Investment Corp. ISSUE AMOUNT (mn) JPY 8,000 R&I GREEN BOND. Mitsubishi Corp.-UBS Realty Inc.

Third-party Opinion on Impact Investment Project by Industrial & Infrastructure Fund Investment Corporation

Thematic Research. Sector Report: Aerospace & Defence. Ready for takeoff? Executive Summary

Investing in the Sun with Vivint Solar. Q Financial Results

Green Bond Impact Reporting

The I-REC Code. version 1.4

New Jersey SREC Update OCTOBER 2015

Ucap Hong Kong Asset Management Limited. Weekly Equity Review. 25 th September 2018

SolarCity Third Quarter 2016 Shareholder Letter

Transcription:

Type of engagement: Green Use of Proceeds Securitized Bonds Pre-Issuance Review Date: March 29, 2018 Engagement Leader: Ankita Shukla, ankita.shukla@sustainalytics.com, +1 (617) 603-3329 Introduction In 2017, Solar Mosaic, Inc. ( Mosaic ) developed the Solar Mosaic Green Use of Proceeds Securitized Bond Framework (the Framework ) under which affiliates of Mosaic issued notes (i.e., MSAIC 2017-1 and MSAIC 2017-2) under Mosaic s Solar Loan Program. The multiple issuances consisted of Solar Loan backed notes and Residual Interests which were issued through one or more wholly owned subsidiaries. In March 2018, Mosaic engaged Sustainalytics to review the issuance by, in connection with Mosaic s third securitization under Mosaic s Solar Loan Program, of notes (the Notes ) primarily secured by a pool of loans made to consumers to finance the purchase and installation of residential solar power generation systems and related items or services. Sustainalytics provided an assessment as to whether the projects and transparency requirements of the third 2018-1 issuance meet the criteria and the reporting commitments outlined in the Solar Mosaic Green Use of Proceeds Securitized Bond Framework Overview and Second-Party Opinion provided by Sustainalytics. This document should be read in conjunction with the Framework. Evaluation Criteria Sustainalytics evaluated the underlying projects that will be funded through the Mosaic Solar Loan Trust 2018-1 issuance in April 2018 for compliance based on whether: 1. The projects are aligned with the Use of Proceeds Eligibility Criteria outlined in the Framework Overview; 2. The estimated environmental impact of the issuance is reported based on the two Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) outlined in the Framework Overview; and 3. The commitments to select projects and manage proceeds from the Mosaic Solar Loan Trust 2018-1 issuance are aligned with the commitments described in the Framework Overview. Appendix 1 lists the Use of Proceeds and Eligibility Criteria, while Appendix 2 lists the associated KPIs. Issuing Entity s Responsibility Mosaic is responsible for providing accurate information and documentation relating to the details of the projects that have been funded, including description of eligible solar loans, and project impact. This information was provided to Sustainalytics to support its review. Mosaic is also responsible for confirming to Sustainalytics that processes for project selection and management of proceeds for the 2018-1 issuance will remain aligned with the commitments described in the Framework Overview. Independence and Quality Control Sustainalytics, a leading provider of ESG and corporate governance research and ratings to investors, conducted the verification of Mosaic s Solar Loan Trust 2018-1 issuance and provided an independent opinion. The work undertaken as part of this engagement included documentation from Mosaic employees and review of documentation to confirm the alignment with the Framework. Sustainalytics made all efforts to ensure the highest quality and rigor during its assessment process and enlisted its Sustainability Bonds Review Committee to provide oversight over the assessment of the review. Sustainalytics 2018

Conclusion Based on the limited assurance procedures conducted 1, nothing has come to Sustainalytics attention that causes us to believe that the reviewed bond projects, funded through proceeds of Mosaic s Solar Loan Trust 2018-1, are not in conformance in all material respects with the Use of Proceeds and Reporting Criteria outlined in the Solar Mosaic Green Use of Proceeds Securitized Bond Framework. Mosaic has also confirmed to Sustainalytics that the proceeds of the Notes will be managed in alignment with the commitments described in the Framework. 1 Sustainalytics limited assurance process includes reviewing the documentation relating to the details of the projects that have been funded, including descriptions of projects, estimated and realized costs of projects, and project impact, which were provided by the Issuer. The Issuer is responsible for providing accurate information. Sustainalytics has not conducted on-site visits to projects. 2

Appendix 1: Use of Proceeds Eligibility Criteria The proceeds from the sale of the Notes are expected to be used to make initial deposits into the Reserve Account and the Distribution Account to pay the transaction costs in connection with the issuance of the Notes and to pay the purchase price of the Solar Loans. A portion of the proceeds from the sale of the Notes will be used to repay the lenders under warehouse financings of Mosaic s special purpose subsidiaries. To be eligible to be funded by the proceeds, the projects funded must meet the following criteria: a. Fall within selected renewable and alternative energy product categories, including, but not limited to: i. Solar Panel Modules ii. Solar inverters iii. Services related to the installation of products under i. and ii. b. Installed by Mosaic approved installer c. Use Mosaic approved equipment. Mosaic determines the eligibility of the projects financed based on Installer Approval policies and Equipment qualification criteria. Eligible projects must be undertaken with Mosaic s Approved Installers and use equipment from the Approved Vendor List in Appendix 1 and 2 of the Framework Overview and Second- Party Opinion document. Appendix 2: Impact Reporting by Eligibility Criteria Based on the sizes reported and usage assumed by the Approved Installers, the following environmental impacts are assumed from the Solar Energy Systems funded by the Solar Loans that collateralize the Notes. These are good faith estimates provided by the Approved Installers, but Mosaic cannot and does not guaranty the accuracy of these estimates. Environmental Impact Impact Metrics Impact Figures Total capacity of solar energy systems financed by solar loans backing the Notes Megawatts (DC) approximately 65 MW Total estimated renewable energy produced by solar energy systems (during estimated 30 years of useful life) Megawatt hours approximately 2,760,000 MWh 3

Disclaimer Sustainalytics 2018. All rights reserved. No part of this second party opinion (the Opinion ) may be reproduced, transmitted or published in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of Sustainalytics. The Opinion was drawn up with the aim to explain why the analyzed bond is considered sustainable and responsible. Consequently, this Opinion is for information purposes only and Sustainalytics will not accept any form of liability for the substance of the opinion and/or any liability for damage arising from the use of this Opinion and/or the information provided in it. As the Opinion is based on information made available by the client, Sustainalytics does not warrant that the information presented in this Opinion is complete, accurate or up to date. Nothing contained in this Opinion shall be construed as to make a representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the advisability to invest in or include companies in investable universes and/or portfolios. Furthermore, this Opinion shall in no event be interpreted and construed as an assessment of the economic performance and credit worthiness of the bond, nor to have focused on the effective allocation of the funds use of proceeds. The client is fully responsible for certifying and ensuring its commitments` compliance, implementation and monitoring. 4

Sustainalytics Sustainalytics is an independent ESG and corporate governance research, ratings and analysis firm supporting investors around the world with the development and implementation of responsible investment strategies. With 13 offices globally, Sustainalytics partners with institutional investors who integrate environmental, social and governance information and assessments into their investment processes. Today, the firm has more than 300 staff members, including 170 analysts with varied multidisciplinary expertise of more than 40 sectors. Through the IRRI survey, investors selected Sustainalytics as the best independent responsible investment research firm for three consecutive years, 2012 through 2014 and in 2015, Sustainalytics was named among the top three firms for both ESG and Corporate Governance research. The firm was also named the Best SRI or Green Bond Research Firm by Global Capital in 2015. For more information, visit www.sustainalytics.com Or contact us info@sustainalytics.com 5