Review Procedures for High Cost Medical Equipment

Similar documents
US Army Reserve Personnel Center

UNITED STATES ARMY PHYSICAL DISABILITY AGENCY

Gifts for Distribution to Individuals

The Cost and Economic Analysis Program

United States Army Cost and Economic Analysis Center

VALIDATION & SURVEILLANCE

Army Discharge Review Board

Army Standardization Policy

July 16, Audit Oversight

Zachary and Elizabeth Fisher Distinguished Civilian Humanitarian Award

Attitude and Opinion Survey Program

US ARMY CIVILIAN APPELLATE REVIEW AGENCY

Controls Over Funds Appropriated for Assistance to Afghanistan and Iraq Processed Through the Foreign Military Sales Network

Department of the Army. Acquisition Management Review Agency. Unclassified. Army Regulation Organizations and Functions.

Food Cost and Feeding Strength Summary (RCS CSGLD 1596 (R 5))

Improving the Accuracy of Defense Finance and Accounting Service Columbus 741 and 743 Accounts Payable Reports

Budgeting, Funding, and Reimbursement for Base Operations Support of Army Activities

Army Medical Department Expendable/Durable Items

Temporary Duty (TDY) UNCLASSIFIED. Army Regulation Assignments, Details, and Transfers

75th MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

Financial Management

Report No. D March 24, Funds Appropriated for Afghanistan and Iraq Processed Through the Foreign Military Sales Trust Fund

Army Commercial Vendor Services Offices in Iraq Noncompliant with Internal Revenue Service Reporting Requirements

The Feasibility of Alternative IMF-Type Stabilization Programs in Mexico,

Oversight Review March 7, 2012

Independent Auditor's Report on the Agreed-Upon Procedures for Reviewing the FY 2011 Civilian Payroll Withholding Data and Enrollment Information

Management of Contracted Advisory and Assistance Services

GAO. DEFENSE CONTRACTING Progress Made in Implementing Defense Base Act Requirements, but Complete Information on Costs Is Lacking

The Enhanced Reserve Component Foreign Area Officer Program

Army Research and Development Achievement Awards

Investigation of NATO Nation Aircraft or Missile Accidents and Incidents

Real or Illusory Growth in an Oil-Based Economy: Government Expenditures and Private Sector Investment in Saudi Arabia

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP)

Report Documentation Page

Report No. D

TRANS - PORTATION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY AND RELATED SERVICES

Army Regulation Field Organizations. Duty Rosters. Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 15 November 1975 UNCLASSIFIED

versight eport Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Defense Affordability Expensive Contracting Policies

Unemployment Compensation (Insurance) and Military Service

Military Base Closures: Role and Costs of Environmental Cleanup

FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR THE DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY - GENERAL FUNDS AT DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE COLUMBUS

Innovation in Defense Acquisition Oversight: An Exploration of the AT&L Acquisition Visibility SOA

versight eport Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Impacting PMPM Through Strong Clinical Management AMEDD Example: Redstone Arsenal vs. Ft Anywhere

Risk Analysis for Army Property

Headquarters U.S. Air Force

Financial Management

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Needs to Improve the Process for Reconciling the Other Defense Organizations' Fund Balance with Treasury

Cost Growth, Acquisition Policy, and Budget Climate

TRICARE Operations and Policy Update

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per

Report Documentation Page

Veterans Benefits: Pension Benefit Programs

Research Study of River Information Services on the US Inland Waterway Network

Deficiencies in Journal Vouchers That Affected the FY 2009 Air Force General Fund Statement of Budgetary Resources

Increases in Tricare Costs: Background and Options for Congress

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Army Finance and Accounting Quality Assurance Program

Estimating Hedonic Price Indices for Ground Vehicles (Presentation)

Field Operating Agencies, Office of the Chief of Staff, Army

Physical Security of the Alternate Joint Communications Center (AJCC)

Analytical Tools for Affordability Analysis. David Tate Cost Analysis and Research Division Institute for Defense Analyses

Life After Service Study (LASS): How are Canadian Forces Members doing after Transition to Civilian Life?

Author: Robert T. Ford

Army s Audit Readiness at Risk Because of Unreliable Data in the Appropriation Status Report

Management of the Defense Foreign Language Program

Earned Value. Defense Acquisition Reform and Project Management. Wayne Abba Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition & Technology)

Report No. D October 22, Defense Finance and Accounting Service Contract for Military Retired and Annuitant Pay Functions

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Financial and Performance Audit Directorate. Quality Control Review. Ernst & Young LLP Analytic Services Inc. Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 1996

Inspector General FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Saudi Arabia: Measures ojtransition from a Rentier State

Commercial Activities Program

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT REGULATION. VOLUME llb REIMBURSABLE OPERATIONS, POLICY AND PROCEDURES-- DEFENSE BUSINESS OPERATIONS FUND

Department of Defense

Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per re

Management Information Control System

National Defense. Commerce. Assurance Cases. Robert A. Martin Sean Barnum May 2011

PUBLIC BUDGETING AND FlNANCIAL MANAGEML"'IT

METU STUDIES IN DEVELOPMENT

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS

War Bonds in the Second World War: A Model for a New Iraq/Afghanistan War Bond?

Controls Over Collections and Returned Checks at Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Indianapolis Operations

Modelling the Growth of a Canadian Military Occupation. MORS Personnel and National Security Workshop January 2010

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

Office of the Inspector General «la.»««'«" Department of Defense

FOREIGN MILITARY SALES (FMS) WARRANTIES: MAJOR PHILIP L. CUNNINGHAM, USA

Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution System

Financial Management

Testimony The 2014 Long-Term Budget Outlook Douglas W. Elmendorf Director Before the Committee on the Budget U.S. House of Representatives July 16, 20

Financial Innovation in an Islamic Setting: The Case ofpakistan

Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC August *National Guard Regulation (AR)

dit 0M5 Defense of the Inspector General poffice Approved for Public Release DISTRIBUTION STATEMENTA

NGB-JA CNGBM DISTRIBUTION: A 22 February 2018 PROCESSING AND REPORTING CLAIMS

DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 12, Chapter 13 August 2002

AMSAA TECHNICAL REPORT NO. TR CONFIDENCE INTERVAL METHODOLOGY FOR RATIO MEANS (CIM4RM) AUGUST 2010

Transcription:

Army Regulation 40 65 NAVMEDCOMINST 6700.4 AFR 167-13 Medical Services Review Procedures for High Cost Medical Equipment Headquarters Departments of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force Washington, DC 1 November 1986

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burder for this collection of information is estibated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burder to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 01-11-1995 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (FROM - TO) xx-xx-1995 to xx-xx-1995 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Review Procedures for High Cost Medical Equipment 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DCxxxxx 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT APUBLIC RELEASE, 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES CATALOGERS: date of report and dates covered should be 1986 14. ABSTRACT See report. 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT Public Release a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 9 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S) 19. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON http://www.usapa.army.mil/gils/epubs2.html, (blank) lfenster@dtic.mil 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER International Area Code Area Code Telephone Number 703767-9007 DSN 427-9007 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39.18

SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 40 65/NAVMEDCOMINST 6700.4/AFR 167 13 Review Procedures for High Cost Medical Equipment This is a transitional reprint of this publication which places it in the new UPDATE format. Any previously published permanent numbered changes have been incorporated into the text.

Headquarters Departments of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force Washington, DC 1 November 1986 *Army Regulation 40 65 NAVMEDCOMINST 6700.4 AFR 167 13 Effective 1 November 1986 Medical Services Review Procedures for High Cost Medical Equipment History. This UPDATE issue is a reprint of the original form of this regulation that was p u b l i s h e d o n 1 N o v e m b e r 1986. S i n c e t h a t time, no changes have been issued to amend the original. S u m m a r y. T h i s r e g u l a t i o n p r e s c r i b e s r e - vised review procedures for high cost medic a l e q u i p m e n t. I t c h a n g e s t h e r e v i e w t h r e s h o l d f o r a p p l i c a b l e e q u i p m e n t t o t h a t with a unit or system cost of $400,000 or more. Applicability. This regulation applies to all fixed health care activities (HCAs) of the Army, Navy, and Air Force. For Navy users, the procedures prescribed herein are in addition to the requirements stated in the NAV- MEDCOM series. This regulation does not apply to the National Guard or the Reserve. P r o p o n e n t a n d e x c e p t i o n a u t h o r i t y. Not applicable Impact on New Manning System. This regulation does not contain information that affects the New Manning System. A r m y m a n a g e m e n t c o n t r o l p r o c e s s. This regulation is subject to the requirements of AR 11 2. It contains internal control provisions but does not contain checklists for c o n d u c t i n g i n t e r n a l c o n t r o l r e v i e w s. T h e s e checklists are being developed and will be published at a later date. C o m m i t t e e C o n t i n u a n c e A p p r o v a l. S u p p l e m e n t a t i o n. L o c a l l i m i t e d s u p p l e - mentation of this regulation is permitted but is not required. If supplements are issued, Army, Navy, and Air Force Staff agencies and major commands will furnish one copy of each to the office of primary interest of its respective service. Interim changes. Interim changes are not official unless authenticated by The Adjutant General, HQDA. Users will destroy interim c h a n g e s o n t h e i r e x p i r a t i o n d a t e u n l e s s sooner superseded. S u g g e s t e d I m p r o v e m e n t s. T h e A r m y proponent for this joint publication is the Office of The Surgeon General. Army users are invited to send comments and suggested imp r o v e m e n t s o n D A F o r m 2028 ( R e c o m - mended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms) to HQDA (DASG HCL S), WASH DC 20310 2300. Navy and Air Force users may send comments and recommendations through normal channels to their respective Surgeon General (Commander, Naval Medical Command, ATTN: MEDCOM 42, Navy Department, WASH DC 20372 5120, for the N a v y ; a n d H Q A F M S C / S G S L E, B r o o k s, AFB, TX 78235 5000, for the Air Force). Distribution. Army: To be distributed in accordance with D A F o r m 1 2 9 A R r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r A R, Medical Services (Medical Activities Only) Active Army, D; ARNG, None; USAR, None. Navy: SNDL, FH (COMNAVMEDCOM W A S H D C c o m m a n d a c t i v i t i e s ) ; S t o c k e d ; CO, NAVPUBFORMCEN, 5801 Tabor Ave., Phila., PA 19120 5099 Air Force: F; X: AFMLO, Frederick, MD 21701 5006 (6 copies) Contents (Listed by paragraph and page number) Purpose 1, page 1 References 2, page 1 Explanation of abbreviations and terms 3, page 1 Responsibilities 4, page 1 Guidance for preparing and processing equipment requests 5, page 1 Appendix A. Format for Requesting Medical Equipment, page 2 Glossary *This Regulation supersedes AR 40 65/BUMEDINST 6700.38A/AFR 167 13, 15 August 1982. AR 40 65/NAVMEDCOMINST 6700.4/AFR 167 13 1 November 1986 i

RESERVED ii AR 40 65/NAVMEDCOMINST 6700.4/AFR 167 13 1 November 1986

1. Purpose This regulation prescribes responsibilities and procedures for Tri- Service review of requests for medical equipment with a unit or system cost of $400,000 or more. 2. References a. Required publication. Directory of Health Systems Agencies, State Health Planning and Development Agencies, and Statewide Health Coordination Councils is published by the Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR). It is cited in the glossary under the health systems agency definition. (This publication is available from Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Health Planning, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 9A 37, Rockville, MD 20857 0001.) b. Referenced forms. (1) DD Form 1391 (Military Construction Project data). (2) AF Form 332 (Base Civil Engineering Work Request). 3. Explanation of abbreviations and terms Abbreviations and special terms used in this regulation are explained in the glossary. 4. Responsibilities The Army is the proponent, through The Surgeon General (HQDA (DASG HCL S), WASH DC 20310 2300), for updating this regulation and coordinating it with the other military departments. The review process for high cost medical equipment is outlined below. a. Health care activity. The HCA will (1) Maintain appropriate equipment programs to identify equipment requirements meeting the dollar thresholds. (2) Submit requests in the format shown in appendix A. No deviations to this format are authorized. Requests for equipment costing $400,000 or more will be reviewed by the local health systems agency (HSA), the Department of Defense (DOD) regional review committee (DRRC), and by the local Veterans Administration (VA) hospital when that facility is located within 40 miles of the requesting health care activity. (3) After review, send the request through appropriate Service channels. b. DOD regional review committee. The DRRC will (1) Review equipment requests received from HCAs within the region and coordinate requests with other regions when appropriate. (2) Provide concurrence (or nonconcurrence) based on the total need for the requested item within the region. (3) Provide rationale for all decisions. Include any dissenting member views that will assist higher level reviewers. (4) Return all requests to the submitting HCA. c. Departmental intermediate level reviewers. Departmental intermediate level reviewers will (1) Determine if the requested item is required to provide the level of care assigned to the requesting HCA. (2) Determine if manpower levels and levels of care will remain at a level that will sustain the need for the requested item. (3) Determine if operation and maintenance funds are available to make facility changes, install and inspect equipment, and purchase needed supplies. (4) Determine if a less expensive alternative exists. (5) Ensure that cost and workload data are logically developed and accurately presented. (6) Send approved requests to the departmental medical logistics division. d. D e p a r t m e n t a l m e d i c a l l o g i s t i c s d i v i s i o n. T h e d e p a r t m e n t a l medical logistics division will (1) Perform an administrative review of each equipment request to be sure it complies with the above instructions. (2) Perform a technical review of each request to be sure it is a complete system that will do the jobs required by the HCA. (3) Send requirements to appropriate departmental consultants for review and concurrence or nonconcurrence. (4) Send requirements to their counterparts in the other two Services for concurrence. (5) Send a copy of each request to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Medical Readiness). (6) Furnish a copy to the Executive Director, DOD Health Council (DHC). (7) Review and analyze requirements received from the other Services and recommend that the designated member of the Military Medical Regions Task Group approve or disapprove the request. e. Military Medical Regions Task Group. The departmental member and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health A f f a i r s ) ( O A S D ( H A ) ) r e p r e s e n t a t i v e o f t h e M i l i t a r y M e d i c a l Regions Task Group will (1) Evaluate the Tri-Service implications of the request. (2) Resolve any points not resolved at a lower level. (3) Send approved requests, with formalized recommendations, to the DHC. f. The DOD Health Council. (1) The DHC will (a) Evaluate each item requirement. (b) Resolve any points not previously resolved. (c) Approve or disapprove the request. (d) Forward an annotated copy of each approved request to the respective department s medical logistics division. (2) Approval by the DHC will not be construed or cited as a basis for sole source procurement. 5. Guidance for preparing and processing equipment requests a. Activity responsibilities at each level of the review process are shown in paragraph 4. The review sequence may vary among the military departments with respect to intra-service review. b. An economic benefit analysis will support all requests for medical equipment (end items or systems ) costing $400,000 or more. Dollar threshold will include all costs actually dealing with the acquisition. These include design, survey, facility alteration, equipment acquisition, personnel training, and installation. The analysis will include an assessment of equipment available in the local area (40-mile radius) from both the Federal and civil sectors. c. In the continental United States (CONUS), Alaska, and Hawaii, the request will be coordinated within the DOD medical region (and adjoining regions if indicated to include VA hospitals within 40 miles of the requesting health care activity) before departmental review. d. For requirements originating outside the 50 States, regional coordination is required when there is another HCA within a 40- mile radius or when an opportunity for sharing services exists. A statement explaining the reason for not providing coordination will accompany the equipment request. e. Within CONUS, Hawaii, and Alaska, the local HSA will review all requests for medical equipment costing $400,000 or more. This review may be done concurrently with the review by the DOD regional review committee. Copies of correspondence between the requesting activity and the HSA will accompany the request. In areas where the local HSA has been disestablished or is no longer reviewing high cost requirements from DOD medical activities, coordination will be accomplished with the successor organization such as a State health planning agency. In areas which do not have a successor planning agency, a statement to that effect will be included in the equipment request package. AR 40 65/NAVMEDCOMINST 6700.4/AFR 167 13 1 November 1986 1

Appendix A Format for Requesting Medical Equipment General instructions. The following data must accompany the initial submission of items or systems with a total cost (see para A 5 below) of $400,000 or more. The format submission will be worded in concise language, responding to each question in the format shown below. The submission will be understandable without the reader having to refer to this format. Do not use the term not applicable. The submission will state why a question is not applicable. Workload data cited in the submission will pertain only to the equipment or system being requested. The cost analysis section must be complete. Data on cost per procedure and annual costs where services are provided by other Federal facilities must be relatable to workload and cost for performing these same services in-house. A 1. Equipment description a. Give a complete description of the item. (Include all major attachments or accessories, models, and manufacturer.) b. Provide a functional description. Describe what the unit does and its intended use. A 2. Basis for requirement a. How is the function or task accomplished at present? b. What is the current workload? List procedures by type and number. c. What is the planned workload? List procedures by type and number. Provide projected annual workload for only the equipment b e i n g r e q u e s t e d. E x p l a i n a n y d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n c u r r e n t a n d planned workload. d. What savings of time, money, or personnel will be generated? Explain. e. Will patient care be improved? How? f. What technological advantages are gained? g. If a replacement item, provide operational and maintenance history of the item being replaced. This will include age, total days inoperable, maintenance manhours expended, total cost of repairs, and any other information which will support the need to replace the equipment. Additionally, provide proposed disposition of the item being replaced. h. How does the equipment support the assigned physician training program? A 3. Personnel a. Number of qualified personnel required to use the equipment. b. Number of qualified personnel currently available. c. Operator training requirements. (1) Number of personnel to be trained. (2) How is the training to be accomplished? d. Maintenance training requirements. (1) Number of maintenance personnel to be trained. (2) How is training to be accomplished? A 5. Cost Analysis a. Procurement costs: (1) Acquisition: $ (2) Transportation: (3) Installation (para A 4b): (4) Facility modification (para A 4c): (5) Training (para A 3c and A 3d): (6) Total fixed cost: $ b. Life expectancy of the item, or system (include rationale used in establishing the life expectancy). c. Annual allocation of fixed cost (total fixed cost divided by life expectancy). d. Annual operating costs (must be based on workload in para A 2c). (1) Consumable supplies: $ (2) Maintenance (para A 4d): (3) Personnel (para A 3) ( i n c l u d e a l l p e r s o n n e l c o s t s u s i n g a p p r o p r i a t e s t a n d a r d s e r v i c e tables.): (4) Total annual operating costs: $ e. Total annual costs (annual allocation of fixed cost plus total annual operating costs): $ f. Cost per procedure (para A 5e divided by projected workload in para A 2c): $ A 6. Availability of similar equipment a. Other Federal Health Care Facilities (DOD, Veterans Administration, and Public Health Service). (1) Provide name, location, and distance from your activity. (2) Provide cost per procedure. (For multiple procedures use average costs.) List separately for each facility. (3) Identify patient transportation, travel, and per diem costs. Also, identify other costs such as technical or professional personnel required to accompany patients. (4) Show annual cost if workload in paragraph A 2c is purchased from available Federal sources. ( 5 ) E x p l a i n w h y e a c h f a c i l i t y c a n o r c a n n o t s a t i s f y y o u r requirement. b. Civilian health care facilities. (1) Provide name, location, and distance from your activity. (2) Provide cost per procedure. (For multiple procedures use average costs.) List separately for each facility. (3) Identify patient transportation, travel, and per diem costs. Also, identify other costs such as technical or professional personnel required to accompany patients. (4) Show annual cost if the workload in paragraph A 2c is purchased from available civilian sources. ( 5 ) E x p l a i n w h y e a c h f a c i l i t y c a n o r c a n n o t s a t i s f y y o u r requirement. A 4. Equipment installation and support a. Where will the equipment be installed? b. How will the equipment be installed? c. What building modifications (structural and utilities) are required? Include a completed DD Form 1391 (Military Construction Project Data), Air Force Form 332 (Base Civil Engineering Work Request), or comparable documentation with written cost estimate. d. How will the equipment be maintained? 2 AR 40 65/NAVMEDCOMINST 6700.4/AFR 167 13 1 November 1986

Glossary Section I Abbreviations CONUS continental United States DRRC DOD regional review committee DHC DOD Health Council DHHR Department of Health and Human Resources DOD Department of Defense HCA health care activity HSA health systems agency OASD(HA) Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) VA Veterans Administration system. (2) Transportation costs. (3) Installation costs. (4) Facility modification and construction costs. (5) Cost of training operator and maintenance personnel. Immediate level reviewers Any Departmental intermediate command or Service activity that reviews health care activity medical equipment requests below departmental level. Military Medical Regions Task Group A group composed of a general or flag officer of directorate level from each of the military medical departments and a representative of the OASD(HA). DOD regional review committee T h e T r i - S e r v i c e c o m m i t t e e e s t a b l i s h e d i n each DOD military medical region to advise a n d c o o r d i n a t e m a t t e r s h a v i n g T r i - S e r v i c e implications within each region. Section III Special Abbreviations and Terms There are no special terms. Section II Terms Department medical logistics division The functional activity of The Surgeon General of each department that reviews requests from their department and those of the other Services. DOD Health Council Secretary of Defense level organization that coordinates, standardizes, and oversees military health service programs. This includes preprocurement review and approval of all major items of medical equipment or systems with a total cost of $400,000 or more. Health care activity A fixed health care facility of the Army, Navy, or Air Force Medical Department. Health systems agency A local or area-wide health care planning and coordinating group established by Public Law 9 3 6 4 1 ( N a t i o n a l H e a l t h p l a n n i n g a n d r e - sources Development Act) as amended. A list of health systems agencies is contained in the DHHR Directory of Health Systems Agencies, State Health Planning and Development Agencies, and Statewide Health Coordinating Councils, July 1983 editions. (See para 2.) High cost medical equipment Medical equipment or systems with a total cost of $400,000 or more that is required by a health care activity. Total cost includes the sum of the costs shown below: (1) Acquisition cost of the end item or AR 40 65/NAVMEDCOMINST 6700.4/AFR 167 13 1 November 1986 3

PIN 045871 000

USAPA ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING SYSTEM TEXT FORMATTER... Version 2.56 PIN: 045871 000 DATE: 12-16-98 TIME: 10:37:11 PAGES SET: 7 DATA FILE: n168.fil DOCUMENT: AR 40 65 DOC STATUS: NEW PUBLICATION