IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE

Similar documents
Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/14 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:13-cv PLM Doc #8 Filed 12/23/13 Page 1 of 17 Page ID#44

Case 2:17-cv JMV-SCM Document 1 Filed 08/01/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : :

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/07/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT COMPLAINT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

Case 1:14-cv CMA-CBS Document 22 Filed 02/17/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/14/18 Page 1 of 11 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:12-cv CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 06/15/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

8:18-cv DCC Date Filed 01/03/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

Case No.: CLASS ACTION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES PURSUANT TO THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT, 15 U.S.C. 1692, ET SEQ.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Case 1:13-cv NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 08/30/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/03/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1

Case 2:18-cv JAW Document 1 Filed 05/21/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 7:18-cv NSR Document 1 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED vs.

Case 1:17-cv VSB Document 1 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:17-cv SDW-LDW Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv JEO Document 1 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 12

Case: 4:14-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 10/03/14 Page: 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:12-cv IEG-BGS Document 1 Filed 12/14/12 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:18-cv MKB-RML Document 5 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 14

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2015 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/29/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Angelo Bottoni, Paul Roberts, Tracie Serrano, and Shawnee Silva, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated.

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Plaintiffs Case No. 16-CV-1678 CLASS ACTION AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 4:16-cv RGE-SBJ Document 59 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 1 Filed 03/07/13 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

In JAMS. Amended Class Action Demand for Arbitration

Filing # E-Filed 05/23/ :26:50 PM

2:17-cv AJT-SDD Doc # 1 Filed 07/11/17 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Case No.

Case: 4:16-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 02/09/16 Page: 1 of 30 PageID #: 1

Case 2:18-cv Document 3 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 11

Case 2:18-cv Document 3 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 15

Case 2:18-cv SJF-SIL Document 1 Filed 05/25/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 111 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1029

Case 9:18-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/05/2018 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE#

CLASS ACTION ADVERSARY PROCEEDING COMPLAINT. Plaintiffs Karen Ross and Steven Edelman ( Plaintiffs ), on behalf of themselves

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NO. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA. v. ) Case No. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHILTON COUNTY, ALABAMA

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 141 Filed: 12/06/17 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1455

Case 0:17-cv JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2017 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT COMPLAINT. 17 RCW , RCW , and RCW The Attorney General brings this

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION. Negligence

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/05/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv Document 3 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CIVIL DIVISION

Case 2:09-cv WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 04/24/2009 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff R.J. Zayed ( Plaintiff or Receiver ), through his undersigned counsel

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/18 Page 1 of 27 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv AMD-RLM Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTERAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 4:18-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 01/04/18 Page 1 of 13

Case 3:16-cv MCR-CJK Document 18 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FILED US DISTRICT COURT

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH NO. I. INTRODUCTION

Case 1:12-cv PKC Document 2 Filed 06/19/12 Page 1 of 12

Case3:15-cv WHO Document30 Filed07/14/15 Page1 of 45

8:17-cv RFR-FG3 Doc # 1 Filed: 05/26/17 Page 1 of 14 - Page ID # 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 18

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 13

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/18 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1

Case 2:18-cv SJF-AYS Document 3 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 7

Case 3:10-cv LRH-WGC Document 11 Filed 08/16/11 Page 1 of 11

INTRODUCTION. TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ("UBER" or "Defendant") pursuant to North Carolina's Unfair and

REQUIREMENTS OF THE NON-DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYEE BENEFITS CODE

Case 2:10-cv EEF-JCW Document 1 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 13

Case 3:17-cv BR Document 1 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 21

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION. Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FL

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc

Case 5:14-cv FB-JWP Document 1 Filed 10/16/14 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISCTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv WJM-NYW Document 47 Filed 06/16/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, v. Case No. COMPLAINT

PROWN, m. FEB FEUERSTEIN, J. "CAC"), in connection with the collection of a debt allegedly owed by Plaintiff in.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 3:06-cv LRH-RAM Document 133 Filed 11/05/10 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

IN THE TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv PKC Document 1 Filed 10/13/15 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SUMMARY OF CLAIMS. 1. Mr. Ortega worked as a delivery driver for Michigan Logistics, Inc. d/b/a

Case 0:17-cv BB Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2017 Page 1 of 28

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session

Case 2:09-cv WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 05/13/2009 Page 1 of 20

to the Andrew J. Martone, Esq. Mindy K. Mahn, Esq Des Peres Road Suite 200 St. Louis, MO tel fax

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-216

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS COMPLAINT FOR CLASS ACTION. Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 0:18-cv WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/08/2018 Page 1 of 11

Case 0:14-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2014 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICTOF FLORIDA. Plaintiff. Defendants. CLASS ACTIONCOMPLAINT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO

Transcription:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION ) OF NORTH AMERICA, LOCAL 264, ) individually and on behalf of a class of ) all similarly-situated, ) ) 1101 E. 87 St. ) Case No. Kansas City, MO 64131 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Division v. ) ) NEW HORIZONS ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., ) ) Serve: ) Stephanie Isaacson ) 2003 NW 59th Court ) Kansas City, MO 64151 ) ) Defendant. ) PETITION Plaintiff Laborers International Union of North America, Local 264 ( Local 264 ) states the following on personal knowledge as to its own acts, and on information and belief as to all other matters. PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Laborers International Union of North America, Local 264, is an unincorporated association dedicated to representing the rights of construction laborers in the Kansas City area. Local 264 has a principal office in Jackson County, Missouri, and by virtue of its bi-state membership is a citizen of Kansas and Missouri. 1

2. Defendant New Horizons Enterprises, L.L.C. ( New Horizons ), is a Jackson County-based contractor focused on asbestos remediation. New Horizons is a Missouri limited liability company. It is believed that New Horizon s principal member is Stephanie Isaacson, a Missouri resident and citizen. New Horizons is accordingly a citizen of Missouri. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under Mo. Const. art. V, 14, and RSMo 478.070. No federal court has subject matter jurisdiction: both Local 264 and New Horizons are citizens of Missouri; no question arises under federal law; the putative class numbers fewer than 100 members; and the value of relief sought, based upon a projection of the hours at issue and the rate of wages, does not exceed the sum of $75,000 per person, and $5 million in the aggregate, excluding interest and costs. 4. This Court has personal jurisdiction under RSMo 506.500 because New Horizons is domiciled in this state, transacted business within this state, and made contracts within this state which give rise to the cause of action asserted here. 5. Venue is proper under RSMo 508.010 because New Horizons and Local 264 both have their principal offices in Jackson County, and the acts and omissions giving rise to this Petition occurred in Jackson County. FACTS 6. New Horizons Enterprises, L.L.C., is a construction contractor based in Kansas City, Missouri, which performs work related to asbestos remediation. 2

7. Beginning in 2012, New Horizons performed work as a subcontractor on a project or series of projects, generally known as the Commonwealth Project. The Commonwealth Project involves the comprehensive rehabilitation and refinishing of multi-family housing units along Armour Boulevard and Locust Street in midtown Kansas City, Missouri. 8. This work consisted of altering and remodeling the buildings, not routine maintenance. 9. The Commonwealth Project has been paid for in whole or in part with public funds through tax abatements and incentives. As a representative of the project s developer recently told the media: We did a lot of this with historic tax credits. 10. The Commonwealth Project also has been constructed for public use. The power of eminent domain was conferred in connection with the project. 11. The project was overseen by the Planned Industrial Expansion Authority a governmental agency. 12. Logan Parsons and other employees performed construction work on this project for New Horizons. 13. However, New Horizons did not pay the prevailing wages required for any possibly applicable wage classification. Parsons and most other employees received no more than $17.50 per straight-time hour for their work. 14. This is less than half the legal rate. Under Annual Wage Order No. 19, which went into effect in 2012, the Jackson County prevailing wage rate for a second 3

semiskilled laborer the category covering asbestos removal was $26.55. The fringe benefit amount was an additional $13.75. This totals to hourly compensation of $40.30. 15. In addition, Parsons and other workers on the Commonwealth Project regularly worked in excess of 40 hours per week. When New Horizons paid overtime, it only paid at a rate of one-and-a-half times the sub-standard rate. For instance, a worker at $17.50 per hour would receive only $26.25 per overtime hour, instead of one-and-onehalf times the prevailing wage rate. wages. one of them. 16. Employees complained about the failure of New Horizons to pay prevailing 17. New Horizons retaliated against some of these employees, firing at least CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS 18. Local 264 brings this action individually and on behalf of all members of a Putative Class, defined as follows: All persons who performed labor on a construction project or series of projects generally known as the Commonwealth Project, in Kansas City, Jackson County, Missouri, within two years prior to the date of this Petition, and who were employed by New Horizons Enterprises, L.L.C., and including assignees or other valid holders of claims of persons performing such labor. Excluded from the class are any Judges assigned to this case, plaintiff s counsel in this case, their staff and assistants, and immediate family members of these persons. 19. Local 264 proposes that it be appointed as Class Representative, and that its counsel, Louie A. Wright, and Edward (E.E.) Keenan/Keenan Law Firm, LLC, be appointed as class counsel. 4

20. The Putative Class s membership is readily ascertainable from records maintained by New Horizons, and the identity of class members can be determined on an objective basis and in an efficient manner. 21. The Putative Class meets the prerequisites for certification under Mo. S. Ct. Rule 52.08(a). 22. The Putative Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. Though the precise membership is unknown, the Putative Class is believed to number approximately 50 employees. 23. There are questions of law and fact common to the Putative Class. These include but are not limited to: the applicability of the Missouri Prevailing Wage Act to the Commonwealth Project; the type of work performed by New Horizons employees on the Commonwealth Project and the corresponding wage category under Missouri s Annual Wage Orders; the wage rates paid by New Horizons; and New Horizons ultimate liability for unpaid prevailing wages. 24. The claims of Local 264 are typical of the claims of the Putative Class. Parsons has assigned his wage claims on the Commonwealth Project to Local 264, and Local 264 stands directly in the shoes of Logan Parsons as assignee of his claims. Parsons was employed by New Horizons and performed similar work on the project to all other members of the Putative Class. 25. Local 264 will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the Putative Class. Local 264 is experienced in handling prevailing wage disputes and is a longstanding, stable labor organization with the financial and logistical ability to prosecute 5

litigation of this complexity. In addition, Parsons has assured Local 264 that he will assist in providing evidence in this action. Local 264 has hired counsel who is knowledgeable and experienced in labor and employment law and litigation. 26. In addition to meeting the prerequisites under Mo. S. Ct. Rule 52.08(a), this proposed class action meets one or more of the requirements under Mo. S. Ct. Rule 52.08(b). 27. Questions of law or fact predominate over questions affecting only individual members. The core issues in this case are the application of the Missouri Prevailing Wage Act, the wage category applicable to the type of work New Horizons was doing, and whether New Horizons paid that rate. On information and belief, New Horizons had a common policy of not paying prevailing wage rates to any of its employees on the Commonwealth Project. A class action is the superior method for the fair and efficient adjudication of this action, because (A) the limited individual wages at issue perhaps several thousand dollars per person reduce the incentive for each class member to prosecute this case individually; (B) no litigation has been commenced for unpaid prevailing wages, except for a National Labor Relations Board proceeding regarding unfair labor practices, which may involve collateral issues of the proper amount of unpaid wages for one New Horizons employee; (C) it is desirable to concentrate litigation in this forum, as the acts and omissions alleged here occurred in Jackson County, Missouri, and most class members are believed to reside in the Kansas City metropolitan area; and (D) few if any difficulties are likely to be encountered in managing this action, as the number of class members is relatively contained, there is 6

only one basic issue unpaid wages and records are believed to exist that would allow for ready contact with class members during this case. 28. The Purported Class meets all requirements under Mo. S. Ct. Rule 52.08, and should be certified. COUNT I VIOLATION OF THE MISSOURI PREVAILING WAGE ACT, RSMo 290.210 through 290.340 29. Plaintiff incorporates each and every foregoing and succeeding paragraph of this Petition as if fully set forth here. 30. RSMo 290.300 confers a private right of action for enforcement of the prevailing wage laws. 31. Logan Parsons was a workman employed by or on behalf of a public body engaged in the construction of public works, exclusive of maintenance work. Parsons was a second semiskilled laborer. Other employees also were workmen performing such construction as second semiskilled laborers. 32. Parsons has assigned his wage claims to Local 264, which is now the assignee of those claims. 33. New Horizons paid approximately $17.50 per hour. This was below the applicable prevailing wage. 34. By failing to pay the prevailing wage or its equivalent in cash, New Horizons violated Missouri s prevailing wage laws. 7

35. Plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court adjudge New Horizons liable for violation of the Missouri prevailing wage laws, and grant all relief allowed under the law, as set forth in the Prayer in this Petition. COUNT II VIOLATION OF THE MISSOURI MINIMUM WAGE LAW, RSMo 290.500 through 290.530 36. Plaintiff incorporates each and every foregoing and succeeding paragraph of this Petition as if fully set forth here. 37. Logan Parsons was an employee of New Horizons, and at points during his employment worked in excess of forty hours per week. New Horizons also employed other laborers for work in excess of forty hours per week. 38. New Horizons failed to pay overtime based on the prevailing wage rate, and instead paid overtime based on an unlawful base rate of pay. 39. Parsons has assigned his wage claims to Local 264, which is now the assignee of those claims. 40. Plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court adjudge New Horizons liable for violation of the Missouri Minimum Wage Law, and grant all relief allowed under the law, as set forth in the Prayer in this Petition. PRAYER FOR RELIEF Plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court grant the following relief, believed to be in excess of $25,000: 8

1. Certification of the Putative Class and appointment of Local 264 as class representative and Local 264 s counsel as class counsel; 2. Double the unpaid prevailing and overtime wages as provided by Missouri statutes and regulations; 3. Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the maximum rate permitted by law; 4. Declaratory and injunctive relief barring Defendant from further violations of the law; 5. The costs of this action; 6. Reasonable attorney s fees; and 7. Any other and further legal and/or equitable relief that this Court deems just and proper. 8. Based on the size of the class and the number of hours and pay at issue, this action does not seek relief in excess of $75,000 per person, excluding interest and costs, and the aggregate relief demanded does not exceed $5 million, excluding interest and costs. 9

Dated: November 20, 2013 Respectfully submitted, LOUIE A. WRIGHT Mo. Bar No. 38929 1321 Wyandotte, Ste. 200 Kansas City, MO 64108 Tel: (816) 509-4233 Fax: (816) 221-5236 law@iaff42.org and /s/ E.E. Keenan KEENAN LAW FIRM, LLC Edward (E.E.) Keenan Mo. Bar No. 62993 323 Emanuel Cleaver II Blvd., #7E Kansas City, MO 64112 Tel: (816) 809-2100 Fax: (816) 817-1386 ee@kclaborlaw.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, LOCAL 264 10