Water Research Foundation 4372a

Similar documents
Water Loss Control Tools. Software Tools for Supply Side Efficiency

Water Research Foundation 4372a. Real Loss Component Analysis: A Tool for Economic Water Loss Control

Accounting For Loss Water & Revenues

Using Performance Indicators as Part of a Water Audit

Water Loss Control in Effective Utility Management

BEST PRACTICE 3: System Water Loss Control Overview Why a Best Practice? State Planning Requirements

An Introduction to Strategic Water Loss Reduction

WRF Webcast. A Snapshot of Water Loss: Examining the Country s Water Audit Submissions

Economic Level of Leakage (ELL)

The Importance of Real Loss Component Analysis for Determining the Correct Intervention Strategy

George Kunkel, Will Jernigan, Cor Merks

NON REVENUE WATER INTERNATIONAL BEST PRACTICE FOR ASSESSMENT, MONITORING AND CONTROL

Using practical predictions of Economic Intervention Frequency to calculate Short-run Economic Leakage Level, with or without Pressure Management

REPORT ON THE EVALUATION OF WATER AUDIT DATA FOR PENNSYLVANIA WATER UTILITIES

RECENT ADVANCES IN CALCULATING ECONOMIC INTERVENTION FREQUENCY FOR ACTIVE LEAKAGE CONTROL, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CALCULATION OF ECONOMIC LEAKAGE LEVELS

Performance Audit: Department of Watershed Management Efforts to Reduce Water Loss

Some Examples of European Water Loss Targets, and the Law of Unintended Consequences

Performance-based contract financing options Pristina, 7 October, IFC Advisory Services in Public-Private Partnerships

What is PBC and how it can help deal with the challenges of reducing NRW?

City of Norco WATER AND SEWER RATES Frequently Asked Questions

QUALITY OF SERVICE STANDARDS FOR THE SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION OF WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICES. December Final Decision - Summary

Looking at various aspects of leakage calculations

360 CMR (2005)

Performance Based Contracts in Non- Revenue Water Reduction Programs March Session 4: What is a PBC?

Non-Revenue Water Pre-Feasibility Assessment Tool

Utilities - Water and Sewer Funds

Risk-based Prioritization of Transmission & Distribution Projects in Westchester County

Fichtner Management Consulting. Development of the Cost-plus Methodology in Water Supply. International Best Practice

JCI Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) Services AMI System & Water Meter Replacements Water System SCADA Upgrades Acoustic Leak Survey August

OP Concealed Leaks Policy. 1. Policy Statement. 2. Purpose and Objectives. 3. Policy Scope/Coverage. Executive Manager Customer and Community

Calculating Economic Level of Leakage in Malaysia: Uncertainties and Practical Solutions. Martin Shaw Waterloss and Pressure Management Sdn Bhd

CONSISTENCY OF REPORTING PERFORMANCE MEASURES REPORTING GUIDANCE - LEAKAGE

Mbombela Water Indaba : April 2012

WATER AND SEWERAGE CORPORATION BENCHMARKING STUDY (USING WORLD BANK MODEL) DATA REFERENCE GUIDE. Mr. Armbrister Research Department Central Bank

Asset Management Plan Summary Report Adopted May 2012

Three waters A GIS-BASED METHOD FOR SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL EVENTS MANAGEMENT IN WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM

Reducing Non-Revenue Water: Actions to Reduce Real Losses and Improve Customer Satisfaction. June 21, 2016

CHATOM UTILITIES SERVICE RULES AND REGULATIONS

PROJECT SCENARIOS, BUDGETING & CONTINGENCY PLANNING

Staff Report Page No. 1 of 7. CONSENT CALENDAR Agenda Item No.: 7g CC Mtg.: 04/12/2016. April 12,2016 DATE: Mayor and City Council Members TO: FROM:

CITY OF HAMILTON. Corporate Services Budgets & Finance - STANDARD POLICY

Leak Allowance Policy Non-household Customers. Date 01 April 2017 Version 1.0

Irish Water First Fix Leak Repair Scheme

The Effects of Surge Flows on Residential Water Meters

CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA UTILITY SPECIAL DISTRICT S SYSTEMS AND OPERATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2010.

AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

WEST MORGAN-EAST LAWRENCE WATER & SEWER AUTHORITY SERVICE RULES AND REGULATIONS

ASSET INTEGRITY INTELLIGENCE. ADVANCEMENTS IN CUI DETECTION AND OVERVIEW OF MsS GUIDED WAVE. ADAM GARDNER, NDE Specialist at PinnacleART

eres VAT Increase Guide

Inherent risk register

AltaGas Utilities Inc.

Las Vegas Valley Water District Rates and Rules Citizens Advisory Committee 2016 RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT

Integrated Water Resource Management Strategies, Guidelines and Pilot Implementation in Three Water Management Areas, South Africa

RATE INFORMATION. A. The rates adopted by the Authority will be in accordance with of the Code of Virginia, as amended.

County of Inyo Department of Public Works

ARTICLE I. Section 1. "City" shall mean the City of Marion, Linn County, Iowa.

2017 ENTERPRISE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN

Inherent risk register guideline

Nepenthe Association

DEALING WITH LEAKS.

PACP Based Asset Management

Utility Rate Setting & Financial Planning Training

City of St. Albans Water and Wastewater Rates and Fees Summary

2016 Collection Systems Workshop. Asset Management for Small to Midsized Communities

Diablo Water District 2018 Facility Reserve Charge & MERA Update

Diablo Water District PRELIMINARY DRAFT 2016 Facility Reserve Charge & MERA Update

7. OPERATING EXPENDITURE

Risk Assessment and Development of Maintenance Strategy for Pipe Rehabilitation Using WDNetXL

General Business Rules and Regulations

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM

Risk Management on Prepaid Cards

WATER ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN

City of Welland. Comprehensive Asset Management Plan. GMBP File: January 13, Prepared By:

IS-3 Electronic Information Security. Implementation Checklist

Losses on the low voltage underground cable network due to contact voltage. 6 th July 2017

APPENDIX D Examples of Significant Deficiencies and Material Weaknesses

Two SWIFT Case Studies

Toronto Water Budget BU Recommended Operating Budget Recommended Capital Plan 2017 Recommended Water Rate

ScottishPower Gas and Electricity. General Terms and Conditions for Domestic Customers

TEKS: Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills standards Precision Exam: National standards for CTE and General Financial Literacy course testing

Sales & Use Tax: Cost of Compliance at a Glance

Risk Management Policy & Procedures. Premier Ltd.

E-1 HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD GEORGE F. MORROW, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES

APPLICATION FOR WATER SUPPLY IN DAHEJ SEZ TO GIDC, AS CO-DEVELOPER (SPECIMEN FORMAT) At this Special Adhesive Stamp of Rs. 100/-

Town of Hillsborough. City Council Public Hearing. Water Rate Cost-of-Service Study. February 13, 2017

SSC - Appendix A35. South Staffordshire Water PR19. Monte Carlo modelling of ODI RoRE. Issue 3 Final 29/08/18. South Staffordshire Water

Guide to DRF simulation tool

Rule No. 16 Service Connections, Meters, and Customer s Facilities

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

CITY OF SUMMERVILLE APPLICATION FOR UTILITY SERVICE

Risk Based Inspection A Key Component to Generating Value from a Mechanical Integrity Program API Singapore 2012

WATER SERVICE TARIFF RATES, TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR WATER SERVICE WITHIN MARION COUNTY, INDIANA. Issued By The

GUIDANCE NOTES ON APPARENT LOSSES AND WATER LOSS REDUCTION PLANNING. 15th September 2016

FRAMEWORK FOR THE ESTIMATION OF OVERALL PROBABILITY OF DAM FAILURE OF ANCIENT EARTH DAMS IN SRI LANKA

SPRINGVILLE CITY CULINARY WATER IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA) MAY 2014

THE NARRAGANSETT ELECTRIC COMPANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR DISTRIBUTION SERVICE

WATER AND SEWER RATE STUDY

APPENDIX J. CIP Renewal and Replacement Process. Revision History

Lookout Mountain Water District: Genesis and Evolution

VILLAGE OF ALBURGH COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEM WATER ORDINANCE

Transcription:

Water Research Foundation 4372a Real Loss Component Analysis: What s Your Leakage Profile

Project Team

Downloading the 4372 Materials www.waterrf.org, then search for 4372 or real losses 7

The AWWA Water Balance SYSTEM INPUT VOLUME Authorized Consumption Billed Authorized Consumption Unbilled Authorized Consumption Apparent Losses Billed Metered Authorized Consumption Billed Unmetered Authorized Consumption Unbilled Metered Authorized Consumption Unbilled Unmetered Authorized Consumption Consumption Metering Errors Unauthorized Consumption Systematic Data Handling Errors REVENUE WATER NON- REVENUE WATER Water Losses Leakage/Overflow at Reservoirs Real Losses Leakage from Trunk Mains Leakage from Distribution Mains Leakage from Service Connections

Water Loss Control Program Next Steps With A Completed AWWA Water Balance: Volume of Apparent Losses Volume of Real Losses Performance Indicators Data Validity Score Remaining Assessments: Understanding of Real Loss Breakdown (where are these losses occurring? what types of leakage?) Evaluation of Cost-Effective Real Loss Intervention Strategies Cost-Effective Non-Revenue Water Reduction Strategies

Key Points For Model Development Adoption of AWWA Free Water Audit Software & Importance of Data Validation Contextualized Performance Indicators Break Frequency Research Tools for developing water loss control strategies Location & Response Time Improvement Pressure Management Proactive Leak Detection

Component Analysis of Real Losses

Real Losses Calculation for Reported & Un-Reported Leakage Annual Real Loss Volume from Reported Leaks = # of leaks by size * average run time * average flow rate (at average system pressure) Leakage Occurrence Pipe Diameter # of Events Flow Rate (gpm) Average Run Time (hrs) Annual Leakage (MG) Mains Breaks 8 6 46 8.25 3.3 Failure Repair Records Estimated based on pipe size using BABE methodology Awareness Time Estimation + Failure Repair Records for Location & Repair Time

Component Analysis of Real Losses

Contextualized Performance Indicators

Break Frequency Research Focus on Predictive Models Terminology Data Collection Completeness

Break Frequency Research

Leakage Management Strategies Pressure Management Speed and Quality of Repairs Unavoidable Annual Real Losses Economic Level of Real Losses Active Leakage Control Potentially Recoverable Real Losses Current Annual Real Losses Pipeline and Asset Management: Selection, Installation, Maintenance, Renewal, Replacement

Proactive Leak Detection Model

Pressure Management in the Model

Response Time Improvement

Summarized Component Analysis WATER AUDIT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Financial Non-revenue water as percent by volume of water supplied: Non-revenue water as percent by cost of operating system: Annual cost of Apparent Losses: Annual cost of Real Losses: Operational Efficiency Apparent Losses per service connection per day: Real Losses per service connection per day*: Real Losses per length of main per day: er service connection per day per 1787.62743734595 pressure: Unavoidable Annual Real Losses (UARL): Current Annual Real Losses (CARL): Infrastructure Leakage Index (ILI) [CARL/UARL]: 10.3% 3.0% $4,376,956 $1,429,630 13.7 gal/service conn/day 56.0 gal/service conn/day N/A gal/mi/day 0.7 gal/service conn/day/psi 1,453.52 MG/Yr 4,332.21 MG/Yr 3.0 REAL LOSS COMPONENT ANALYSIS RESULTS System Component Background Leakage Reported Unreported Failures Failures Total (MG) (MG) (MG) (MG) Reservoirs 22.08 - - 22.08 Mains and Appurtenances 372.61 217.12 173.49 763.22 Service Connections 844.15 39.55 17.46 901.15 Total Annual Real Loss 1,238.83 256.66 190.95 1,686.44 Real Losses as Calculated by Water Audit Hidden Losses/Unreported Leakage Currently Running Undetected 4,332.21 2,645.77 AWARNESS, LOCATION AND REPAIR TIME REDUCTION RESULTS Reported Failures Total Potential Savings if Location and Repair Duration is Reduced as Simulated on the A-L-R Times Options Sheet Total Potential Cost Savings if Location and Repair Duration is Reduced as Simulated on the A-L-R Times Options Sheet Unreported Failures 182.3 32.9 (MG) $ 23,458 $ 10,837 Per Year ECONOMIC INTERVENTION FREQUENCY FOR PROACTIVE LEAK DETECTION RESULTS Percentage of the System to be Surveyed per Year 31 % Average Annual Budget for Intervention (Proactive Leak Detection) 283,187 $/year Potentially Recoverable Leakage 1,787.63 MG/year ALTERNATIVE PRESSURE MANAGEMENT SCENARIO RESULTS User-Inputted Reduction in Average System Pressure Assumed % Reduction in Average System Pressure Estimated Real Loss Reduction from Pressure Management Program Financial Savings from Pressure Management Program User-Estimated Cost of Pressure Reduction Resulting Pressure Management Program Payback Period 5.0 PSI 6% 203.1 MG/Yr 67,026 $/Year 100,000 $ 1.5 Years

Please be in touch! Reinhard Sturm Water Systems Optimization e: reinhard.sturm@wsoglobal.com Kate Gasner Water Systems Optimization e: kate.gasner@wsoglobal.com