BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION DOCKET NO EI

BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION DOCKET NO. 000-EI IN RE: TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY S PETITION FOR AN INCREASE IN BASE RATES AND MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBIT OF GORDON L. GILLETTE

TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET NO. 000-EI FILED: 0/0/0 1 BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GORDON L. GILLETTE Q. Please state your name, address, occupation and employer. A. My name is Gordon L. Gillette. My business address is 0 N. Franklin Street, Tampa, Florida 0. I am employed by Tampa Electric Company ( Tampa Electric or company ) as President. 1 Q. Please provide a brief outline of your educational background and business experience. 1 1 A. I received a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering in 11 and a Master of Science degree in Engineering Management in from the University of South Florida. In 00, I completed the Advanced 0 Management Program at Harvard Business School. I am a 1 registered professional engineer in the State of Florida. I joined Tampa Electric in 11 as an engineer and worked in the production and planning areas. I was promoted to Manager of Generation Planning in May and later

served as Manager of Bulk Power and Generation Planning. In January 11, I became Director of Project Services for TECO Power Services, responsible for fuel procurement, environmental permitting and compliance and power sales contract administration. In November 1, I was promoted to Vice President of Regulatory Affairs for Tampa Electric, and in November, I was named Vice President of Regulatory and Business Strategy for Tampa Electric. In March 1, I 1 was appointed Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of TECO Energy and Tampa Electric. In 001, I was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for TECO Energy. In July 00, I was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TECO Energy and President of TECO Guatemala. 1 1 0 1 In July 00, I was promoted to President of both Tampa Electric and Peoples Gas. As President, I am responsible for the operation of the utilities, including Energy Supply, Energy Delivery, Customer Care, Community Relations, Fuels Management and Regulatory Affairs. Q. What is the purpose of your direct testimony?

A. After extensive and careful analysis, Tampa Electric is requesting approval by the Florida Public Service Commission ( FPSC or Commission ) for an increase in the company s retail base rates and service charges. The purpose of my direct testimony is to provide an overview of Tampa Electric's need for rate relief beginning in January 0 and to describe the efforts we have taken to avoid or defer seeking adjustments to our base rates and charges. I will also introduce the other witnesses who 1 have filed direct testimony in support of the company's petition and briefly describe the subject matter each witness will cover. Q. Have you prepared an exhibit to support your direct testimony? 1 1 A. Yes. Exhibit No. (GLG-1) entitled Exhibit of Gordon L. Gillette was prepared under my direction and supervision. It consists of two documents, as follows: 0 1 Document No. 1: List Of Tampa Electric Witnesses And Purpose Of Their Direct Testimony Document No. : List Of Minimum Filing Requirement Schedules Sponsored Or Co-Sponsored By Gordon L. Gillette

Q. Please describe Tampa Electric. A. Tampa Electric was incorporated in Florida in 1 and was reincorporated in 1. In 11, Tampa Electric became a wholly owned subsidiary of TECO Energy, Inc. The company is a public utility regulated by the Commission and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ( FERC ). The company provides retail electric service to approximately,000 customers over an approximate,000 square mile service territory within Hillsborough and portions of Polk, Pasco and Pinellas counties. 1 1 1 0 1 The company maintains a diverse portfolio of generating facilities with a net winter capability of approximately,00 Megawatts. Tampa Electric operates three major electric generating stations that include fossil steam units, combined cycle units, combustion turbine peaking units, and an integrated gasification combined cycle unit. These units are located at Big Bend Power Station, H.L. Culbreath Bayside Power Station and Polk Power Station. Tampa Electric's transmission system consists of over 1,00 miles of overhead facilities,,00 towers and poles and miles of underground facilities. The

company's distribution system consists of approximately,00 miles of overhead facilities,,000 poles and,00 miles of underground facilities. Tampa Electric s transmission and distribution systems are connected through 0 substations throughout its service territory. Q. Please summarize the company s position in this case. A. Tampa Electric s primary goal is to safely provide reliable electric service at the lowest reasonable long- run cost. While the goal is simple to state, it is 1 difficult to achieve. We are constantly challenged by changes in the economy, shifting needs of our customers and variations in weather. The company is also challenged by the ever-increasing need to protect our environment and to comply with new laws and regulations. 1 1 0 1 I believe that Tampa Electric has met these challenges. Between the company s last base rate proceeding and December 0, the company will have increased electric plant-in-service by approximately $1.1 billion for generating facilities, new environmental equipment, transmission and distribution facilities and other infrastructure necessary to comply with regulations and reliably serve our customers. As a result, the company s

0 projected total rate base includes approximately $0 million that is not reflected in the company s current base rates. Like other utilities around the nation, the economic slowdown over the past four years has adversely impacted the company. We have worked diligently to manage our way through the slowdown and resulting lower revenues. We 1 1 have controlled operations and maintenance ( O&M ) expenses, refinanced long-term debt at lower rates and taken advantage of federal income tax incentives that have resulted in substantially higher levels of zero-cost capital in our capital structure. Nevertheless, the demands of providing safe and reliable service to our customers have not diminished and, in fact, have grown. Tampa Electric needs rate relief now to ensure that we are in a position to preserve our financial integrity so we can continue to provide good service to our customers 1 at fair, just and reasonable rates. Further, with our 0 1 Polk - Conversion Project underway, the company needs to be strong financially to attract needed capital from the market at the best rates. RELIEF REQUESTED Q. What is the company s specific base rate relief request

in this case? A. Based on the considerations I will describe, Tampa Electric is requesting a $. million increase in base rates and service charges effective January 1, 0, based on a 0 projected test year. This increase will cover the reasonable costs of providing service and allow the company an opportunity to earn an appropriate return on rate base. 1 I am proud of our team members efforts in managing all categories of expenses, and I am pleased with the benefits we have provided to our customers. Unfortunately, the results of our efforts are no longer sufficient to cover our costs to provide service. For 1 0, the company filed a forecasted surveillance report with this Commission with an expected. percent rate of return on equity ( ROE ), which is well below the 1 bottom of our authorized range. For 0, without the 0 1 revenue requirements sought in this case, we expect the company s ROE to be at. percent. It is critical over the short- and long-term for our customers to have a financially solid electric utility with access to the capital markets to fund the required capital program to serve customers reliably going forward. A projected ROE

of. percent for 0 does not provide the level of financial integrity needed to accomplish this goal and is not in the best interest of customers or shareholders. On behalf of Tampa Electric, witness Robert B. Hevert will testify that the requested ROE of. percent is fair and reasonable. Tampa Electric witness Jeffrey S. Chronister will discuss the company's budgeted O&M expenses, income statement, balance sheet and ongoing capital budget along with the calculation of Tampa Electric's revenue requirement for 0. 1 EVENTS SINCE TAMPA ELECTRIC S LAST BASE RATE PROCEEDING Q. When was the company's last full revenue requirements proceeding? A. The company's last full revenue requirements proceeding 1 was filed August, 00. The Commission issued its 1 0 Order No. PSC-0-0-FOF-EI in Docket No. 00-EI on April 0, 00 granting Tampa Electric a rate increase. 1 Q. What has been the company s experience since its last base rate proceeding? A. The company s experience from 00 to 01 has been

unusual, at least compared to historical trends. During the middle of 00, it became clear that the country was heading into a period of unusual uncertainty and an economic downturn that many refer to now as the Great Recession. This unforeseen recession generated a period of slow or negative economic growth and, for electric utilities like Tampa Electric, slower customer growth and lower average customer energy usage. The recent recessionary period was unprecedented. Over 1 the last five decades, during past recessions, it has taken an average of months to return to prerecession unemployment rates. However, as of March 0, or months after the Great Recession began, unemployment has not yet returned to pre-recession unemployment levels in our service territory, in Florida, or the nation. In addition, in past recessions, our 1 1 service territory had fared better than Florida as a whole, and Florida had fared better than the nation in 0 terms of unemployment. For the majority of this past 1 recession, the opposite has been the case. As a result, a significant portion of the energy sales we forecasted in the company s 00 base rate proceeding never materialized. The total base revenues approved by

the Commission in 00, including the step increase revenues, were approximately $0 million. However, from 00 to 01, base revenues have averaged about $00 million per year and have never exceeded $ million. Annual retail energy sales have declined in four of the last five years. In fact, the company s forecasted adjusted jurisdictional base revenues for the 0 test year are $0 million, a significant reduction from the level of base revenues approved by the Commission in our 00 base rate proceeding. 1 1 1 0 1 Other key statistics illustrate that customer growth during the period from 00 to 01 was different than previously experienced. Tampa Electric currently serves approximately,000 customers, or only about,000 more customers than in 00. This computes to an average growth in the number of customers of 0. percent from 00 to 01, which is substantially lower than the steady annual growth of. percent the company experienced from to 00. During 00 and 00, the company actually experienced an unprecedented five quarters of negative customer growth. Fortunately, 01 ended with a customer growth rate of 1. percent, which the company believes shows that the

1 1 period of unusual uncertainty is over and that Tampa Electric is now poised for a period of more steady customer growth, albeit at a rate much lower than historical averages. Adding to the revenue growth challenges, although the number of customers connecting to our system is now expected to grow, creating demand for new infrastructure, we expect average customer usage to decline as it has been doing since 00. In fact, the company is now experiencing and projecting weather normalized residential customer monthly average usage levels below 1,00 kwh, a decline from a weather normalized peak of over 1,00 kwh per residential customer in 00. The company s expectations of customer growth and average usage are shown in the demand and energy forecast, which in turn serves as the foundation for the 0 test year revenue forecast. The methodologies and assumptions utilized in the company s demand and energy forecast are discussed by Tampa 1 Electric witness Lorraine L. Cifuentes. In addition, on 0 1 behalf of Tampa Electric, witness Eric Fox will also support the load forecast as well as the methodologies and assumptions supporting the company s filing. Q. What actions did the company take to deal with the unusual uncertainty it faced since its last base rate

change? 1 A. The last four years have been far from business as usual for Tampa Electric. The company navigated through this unsettled period by a series of management actions that included controlling capital and O&M expenses, implementing new efficiencies in its operations through organizational changes, benchmarking, continuous improvements and the use of technology. I am very proud of the company s many efforts over the last four years to manage our cost profile in the interest of avoiding requesting a rate increase for as long as possible. Q. In addition to the measures mentioned above, what other measures did the company take to delay or mitigate the need for this rate request? 1 1 0 1 A. The company also managed the challenges of a growing rate base and the revenue shortfall by taking significant and important steps to reduce the weighted average cost of capital from the. percent approved in the 00 base rate proceeding to the. percent proposed in this case. The company achieved these savings by refinancing long-term debt at much lower rates, and by taking advantage of a special federal program providing for 1

bonus depreciation for tax purposes, and by taking opportunities to deduct plant repairs that were previously capitalized for tax purposes. These tax related initiatives have significantly increased the amount of cost-free deferred income taxes in the capital structure. 1 Deferred taxes represent a significant benefit to customers since deferred taxes are a zero-cost source of capital when determining the rate of return and, therefore, allow Tampa Electric to utilize cash tax savings to help fund its capital needs. Witness Chronister, as well as Tampa Electric witness Sandra W. Callahan will discuss these activities in their direct testimony. In addition, witness Callahan will describe 1 the capital structure of the company and the importance of maintaining the company's financial integrity and current credit rating. 1 0 1 Q. Have these efforts been enough to avoid the need for a rate increase? A. Unfortunately, no. Although the economy in both the United States and Florida has slowed, the long-term demands of operating an electric utility and meeting

customer needs have continued unabated. The company was able to weather the economic downturn by managing employee headcount, developing and implementing operating efficiencies and using technology. The company also made temporary reductions of recurring O&M expenses to deal with the revenue shortfalls and increased uncertainty we faced. Witness Chronister, as well as Tampa Electric 1 1 witnesses Mark J. Hornick, S. Beth Young and Brad J. Register will explain the details of these efforts, which have allowed the company to keep annual O&M expenses essentially constant since 00. They will also explain why the company needs to increase its O&M spending to more sustainable and reasonable levels that are in line with the O&M expense levels approved by the Commission at the time of our last base rate proceeding. Witness Chronister will also explain that the company s projected O&M expenses for 0 and 0 will remain below the Commission s O&M expense benchmark. 1 0 Tampa Electric managed O&M spending in an efficient and 1 effective way. Tampa Electric did the same with its capital spending. Since 00, the company has faced the need to make significant incremental capital investments in its electric system to keep it in good working order for the long-term, and to meet the ever increasing

environmental, safety and reliability requirements of our business. The company has strived to make these investments in the most efficient and effective manner possible. Since the last base rate proceeding the company will have invested approximately $1.1 billion in new electric plant in service by 0, which, net of accumulated depreciation and including working capital, will yield an increase in net adjusted jurisdictional rate base of approximately $0 million by 0. 1 Unfortunately, the level of capital spending that has been required and the resulting rate base growth has not been matched by customer and revenue growth. In the past, growth in the number of customers and average energy use per customer has been sufficient to pay for improvements to the electric system and cumulative depreciation expense, recurring maintenance and general 1 inflation. However, due to the significant slowdown in 1 0 1 customer growth and the reversal in average customer usage, revenue growth has not been adequate to keep pace with the increases in the company s rate base and the related revenue requirements that are essential to serve customer needs. Q. What are the primary drivers of the revenue requirement

request being made in this proceeding? 1 A. The primary driver of our need for additional revenue are incremental capital costs and related depreciation expense associated with rate base growth. The growth in investment related to these costs has not been supported by a corresponding growth in revenues. Projected revenue levels, coupled with projected cost increases and the increasing demands of operating a public utility, have reduced the company s projected return on equity to the point that will impair the company s financial integrity unless we are granted rate relief. Q. How does the company s proposed base revenues for 0 compare to the base revenues provided for by the Commission in current rates? 1 1 0 1 A. Jurisdictional adjusted base revenues for 0 are $0 million. The company s projected base revenues approved by the Commission in our 00 base rate proceeding were approximately $ million. Q. Why does Tampa Electric need rate relief now? A. It is always fair to ask why a rate increase is needed;

however, given the conditions the company has faced, it is remarkable that the company managed to delay its request for new rates until now. The economic downturn that resulted in significant revenue shortfalls and the needed investments in infrastructure in order to provide safe and reliable electric service since the last rate proceeding are driving the need for new rates. The significant steps we took to lower cost of capital and be as efficient as possible have significantly benefited customers by delaying and reducing the size of the rate relief needed. 1 LOOKING FORWARD Q. Does the company expect to continue growing in the future? A. Yes. We believe the period of unusual uncertainty caused 1 by the Great Recession is over. The company expects 1 0 customer growth in the service area will continue, although at a slower pace than the steady growth 1 experienced in the past. Looking to the future, the company anticipates that the costs of complying with environmental and reliability standards will continue to increase. While increased efficiencies and aggressive management of costs have allowed the company to operate

effectively, the current base rates will not be sufficient to allow Tampa Electric to continue to meet the electric needs of existing and new customers in a safe and reliable way. The company projects that without rate relief, the 0 return on equity will fall to. percent, a level that is insufficient to attract capital and continue to provide safe and reliable electric service. Q. Will Tampa Electric need to continue to invest in its electric system given the slowdown in growth? 1 A. Yes. The company will continue to connect new customers to our system at an expected rate of about 1. percent per year; however, average customer usage is forecasted to decline by 0. percent, due to energy efficiency and conservation measures. As witnesses Hornick and Young 1 1 0 explain in their direct testimonies, the company will need to continue to invest in its system to serve new and existing customers and to provide safe, reliable service 1 to customers. Witness Callahan will explain that the company will have capital spending needs of $1. billion between 0 and 0 in order to maintain normal operations. 1

On top of these capital requirements for our ongoing operating needs, the company will be making a substantial investment between 0 and 0 for the conversion of Polk Units - to a more efficient combined cycle unit and the construction of associated transmission facilities. The Commission approved the need for the 1 1 1 0 Polk - Conversion and the associated transmission in December 01. The project will rely principally on waste heat, which is essentially free fuel, making it the most efficient plant in our system. Through the need determination process, the Commission determined that the Polk - Conversion Project was the most cost-effective option to address customer demand. Witness Hornick provides more detail on the project in his direct testimony. Witness Callahan will explain how this project will impact our need for added capital and how the decisions the Commission makes in this case will affect the company s financial integrity at the time significant capital spending for the Polk - Conversion project begins. 1 Q. What other efforts has the company made to avoid or mitigate the need for a rate increase and to run its operations safely and efficiently? 1

1 A. In addition to managing O&M costs and reducing its cost of capital, the company has made significant efforts and achieved significant positive results in the areas of environmental stewardship, reliability, safety and employee compensation and benefits. The company has installed new information technology in many areas making it more efficient and effective. Additionally, the implementations of continuous improvement programs and benchmarking activities have produced cost savings that are described in the testimonies of witness Hornick and Young. The company is also proposing a reasonable approach for storm damage expenses in this case. Q. Please describe the company s ongoing environmental commitments to limit emissions and maximize beneficial re-use. 1 1 0 1 A. In April 0, Tampa Electric completed installing the Selective Catalytic Reduction systems at Big Bend Power Station. This was part of a -year, $1. billion environmental improvement plan signed in 1 with the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Additionally, more than percent of combustion byproducts generated at Big Bend and Polk Power Stations are sold to third parties for beneficial re-use. 0 The

company s byproduct marketing efforts have been recognized by the Commission Staff as among the best in Florida and help the company protect the environment and reduce the net cost of operating Big Bend and Polk Power Stations. Q. What have been the benefits of Tampa Electric s emission control activities? 1 1 1 A. Since 1, Tampa Electric has reduced annual SO, NO x and particulate matter emissions from its generating facilities by percent, 1 percent and percent, respectively. In addition to the reductions in regulated emissions listed above, the company has reduced systemwide emissions of CO by over 0 percent since 1. Furthermore, the company has worked with several local communities and agencies to develop and implement mutually beneficial solutions to maximize the beneficial re-use of reclaimed water and to reduce the use of groundwater. 0 1 Q. How has the company performed in the areas of reliability and safety? A. Despite significant pressure to control O&M spending, the company has performed very well in the areas of 1

1 reliability and safety. Reliability is achieved by minimizing service interruptions by maintaining adequate supply and availability of generating capacity and maintaining the energy delivery system with sufficient capacity and availability for the timely recovery of the system in the event of an outage. The total interruption time for the average Tampa Electric customer is lower than many other utilities and is in the top quartile of performance for southeastern utilities. Within Florida, Tampa Electric s five-year average of total interruption time for the average customer is the second lowest in the state compared to the other investor-owned utilities, despite our company s location in one of the most lightning prone areas in Florida. 1 1 The performance of Tampa Electric s generating units has also been very good and has helped the company defer its need for an increase in base rates while reducing customer bills each consecutive year by reducing fuel and 0 purchased power expenses. The company has improved the 1 performance and availability of its existing generating units since the last base rate proceeding. These improvements have provided, in effect, additional generation at a relatively low cost compared to the costs of constructing new and more expensive units. Witness

Hornick explains how the company s generating performance has improved in his direct testimony. Tampa Electric witness J. Brent Caldwell describes how the company manages its fuel procurement and transportation strategies to maintain plant reliability in a costeffective way. 1 1 1 Tampa Electric continues to excel in the area of safety. For 01, the company was ranked second among participating members of the Southeastern Electric Exchange for its Occupational Safety and Health Administration recordable injury rate. The company s incidence rate was 0., its lowest ever rate and the first time the company achieved an incidence rate below 1.0. The company achieved these outstanding results while also doing its best to manage its costs during an economic downturn, demonstrating the company s commitment to balance the needs to manage costs while continuing to improve its internal processes for the benefit of its 0 employees and customers. Witnesses Young and Hornick 1 explain both the company s reliability measures and safety practices and results in their testimonies. Q. What has the company done to manage employee compensation and benefit costs?

A. The company has aggressively managed its total employee headcount, compensation levels and employee benefit expenses. Witness Register will discuss the company's employee benefit costs, its record of controlling health care costs and the gross payroll expenses for the company. Q. What is the company s proposal for the annual storm damage accrual and reserve target in this case? 1 1 1 0 A. Consistent with the Commission s decision in our 00 rate proceeding, the company is proposing to maintain the annual storm damage accrual amount at $ million, but to increase the storm damage reserve target to $0 million. Tampa Electric witness Edsel L. Carlson Jr. will address the appropriateness of the proposed annual storm reserve accrual and the target level for the storm reserve. In addition, on behalf of Tampa Electric, witness Steven P. Harris will present his study supporting our proposed annual storm reserve accrual. 1 RATE DESIGN Q. Please discuss Tampa Electric s proposed overall rate design.

1 A. The rates and service charges proposed by Tampa Electric in this case have been designed to produce the company s requested additional annual revenues of $. million. Tampa Electric s proposed rate design accurately reflects the cost to serve each of the various classes. Cost of service is a major consideration in the rate design, as is rate stability and continuity. The rate for the residential class has been designed to provide conservation-oriented price signals through the continued use of tiered pricing. In addition, the company is proposing to use a cost allocation methodology that places equal emphasis on demand and energy. Tampa Electric witness William R. Ashburn will discuss the jurisdictional separation and retail cost of service studies, billing determinants, billed electric revenue budgets and rate design. 1 1 Q. Has Tampa Electric considered its customers before filing for an increase in rates? 0 1 A. Yes, we have. A major tenet of Tampa Electric s operating philosophy is a focus on our customers. The company has carefully evaluated all options before making this request. We understand that the recession has been tough on families, businesses, and government

institutions. Most of our team members are customers. The company is keenly aware of the impacts that a price increase has and we remain committed to continuing to implement efficiencies and other prudent cost-cutting measures that mitigate the need for higher rates. Given the existing lower fuel clause expenses, total customer bills after the proposed rate increase will still be lower than the resulting bills from the prior rate case and lower than bills in 00. 1 Q. Does the company have any programs designed for customers facing difficult financial challenges in paying their electric bill? 1 1 A. Yes. The company s special needs programs include our + program and other assistance we provide to a variety of social services programs, such as our SHARE program, a program that helps customers who have low-incomes and/or who are medically disabled and unable to pay their 0 energy-related bills. Commission-approved conservation 1 related credits and cash incentives are also provided to customers to encourage them to use electricity wisely. The company communicates with customers in multiple forums and media on energy issues in an effort to help our customers be more educated consumers and to

understand the value of our product. SUMMARY Q. Please summarize your direct testimony. 1 A. Tampa Electric has worked very hard to establish itself as a low-cost provider of high quality electric service, while being sensitive to the interests of our customers and the environment in which we live. We are extremely proud of our reliability and safety performance, as well as our environmental commitments, as evidenced by our strong performance relative to our peers in all these areas. Our accomplishments reflect the efforts of a strong management team and dedicated team members throughout the company. Collectively, our efforts to manage costs have succeeded in delaying the necessary increase in the company s retail base rates and service 1 charges as long as possible. The central element in 1 0 1 Tampa Electric's operating philosophy is to provide customers with reliable electric service at a reasonable price. We know price increases put economic pressures on our customers, but the declining financial condition of the company, coupled with our obligation to provide reliable service, gives us no choice other than to request an increase in our prices. Having the ability to

earn a fair return on our investments in plant and equipment, both in the near term and over time is beneficial to customers. The company s proposed ROE level will continue to yield benefits to customers by ensuring that we maintain access to capital markets in order to secure the necessary funding for current and future investments at a reasonable cost. The proposed increases in retail base rates are necessary to ensure that Tampa Electric can continue to provide reliable, cost-effective electric service at the levels its customers have come to expect. 1 Q. Does this conclude your direct testimony? A. Yes, it does. 1 1 0 1

TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET NO. 000-EI WITNESS: GILLETTE EXHIBIT OF GORDON L. GILLETTE

TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET NO. 000-EI WITNESS: GILLETTE Table of Contents DOCUMENT NO. TITLE PAGE 1 List Of Tampa Electric Witnesses And Purpose Of Their Direct Testimony 1 List Of Minimum Filing Requirement Schedules Sponsored Or Co-Sponsored By Gordon L. Gillette 0

List Of Tampa Electric Witnesses TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET NO. 000-EI EXHIBIT NO. (GLG-1) WITNESS: GILLETTE DOCUMENT NO. 1 PAGE 1 OF FILED: 0/0/0 And Purpose Of Their Direct Testimony Witness Sandra W. Callahan Robert B. Hevert Jeffrey S. Chronister Lorraine L. Cifuentes Purpose of Direct Testimony Tampa Electric s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and TECO Energy s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, will describe the capital structure of the company, the importance of maintaining the company's financial integrity, and the overall fair and reasonable rate of return needed to accomplish this goal. Managing Partner with Sussex Economic Advisors, will address the company s capital structure, cost of capital and fair and reasonable rate of return. Tampa Electric's Controller, will discuss the company's budgeted O&M expenses, income statement, balance sheet and ongoing capital budget and will review Tampa Electric's outstanding record of managing O&M expense below the Commission's O&M benchmark. In addition, witness Chronister will explain the calculation of Tampa Electric's revenue requirement for 0. Tampa Electric s Manager, Load Research and Forecasting, will discuss the company's load forecasting process, describe the methodologies and assumptions and present the forecast. Eric Fox Director, Forecast Solutions for Itron, Inc., will support the load forecast presented in the company s filing. 1

TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET NO. 000-EI EXHIBIT NO. (GLG-1) WITNESS: GILLETTE DOCUMENT NO. 1 PAGE OF FILED: 0/0/0 Witness Mark J. Hornick Purpose of Direct Testimony Tampa Electric s Director, Engineering and Project Management, will discuss the company s construction and O&M budgets for generation facilities. S. Beth Young Tampa Electric s Director, Transmission, will discuss the company s transmission and distribution system construction and O&M budgets. She will also discuss the company s reliability, service quality and storm hardening activities. Steven P. Harris Edsel L. Carlson Jr. Brent J. Caldwell Brad J. Register William R. Ashburn Vice President with ABS Consulting, will address his study supporting our proposed annual storm reserve accrual and the target level for the storm reserve. Tampa Electric s Risk Manager, will address the appropriateness of the proposed annual storm reserve accrual and the target level for the storm reserve. Tampa Electric s Director, Wholesale Marketing and Fuels, will support the company s fuel inventory requirements. Tampa Electric s Director, Benefits and Compensation, will discuss the company's employee benefit costs, its record of controlling health care costs and the gross payroll expenses for the company. Tampa Electric s Director, Pricing and Financial Analysis, will discuss the jurisdictional separation and retail class cost of service studies, billing determinants, billed electric revenue budgets and rate design.

TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET NO. 000-EI EXHIBIT NO. (GLG-1) WITNESS: GILLETTE DOCUMENT NO. PAGE 1 OF 1 FILED: 0/0/0 LIST OF MINIMUM FILING REQUIREMENT SCHEDULES SPONSORED OR CO-SPONSORED BY GORDON L. GILLETTE MFR Schedule Title F- Public Notice