North American Development Bank Aa1 Stable

Similar documents
Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aa1 issuer and bond ratings of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) with a stable outlook

State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

OECD Workshop on Data Collection

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings

Mongolian Banking System

Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings in the European Union

Rating Action: Moody's changes rating outlook for Black Sea Trade and Development Bank to stable from negative Global Credit Research - 30 Sep 2016

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston

Rating Action: Moody's affirms AIIB's Aaa rating; outlook stable 28 Mar 2019

Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

Snohomish County Public Utility District 1

Credit Opinion: Federal Home Loan Bank of New York

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades South Carolina Public Service Authority revenue bonds; rating outlook negative

CPPIB Capital Inc. Semiannual Update. Credit Strengths. Credit Challenges. Rating Outlook The rating outlook is stable.

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

Policy for Analyst Rotation

Connecticut (State of) State Revolving Fund

Federal Home Loan Banks

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

Ag Lending Experience of Living Through the Cycles

US Local Government GO Debt Methodology

blend Funding plc Update to credit analysis Credit strengths » Liquidity reserve as structural enhancement Credit challenges

Volusia County School District (FL)

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Kommunalkredit Austria AG's public-sector covered bonds Global Credit Research - 25 Jul 2017

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Suriname's issuer rating to B2 negative; concluding rating review Global Credit Research - 20 Feb 2018

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Counterparty Risk Ratings to three Sri Lankan banks 18 Jun 2018

Credit Opinion: Federal Home Loan Banks

3i Group plc. Update following the publication of first-half 2018 financial results. CREDIT OPINION 28 November Update

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Yanlord to Ba2; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 25 Apr 2017

Regional Economic Outlook

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa2 UND/Aa3 ENH to Roswell ISD (Chaves County), NM's GOULT bonds, Ser Sep 2018

Policy on the "SEC Rule 17g-7 of Representation and Warranties" (R&Ws)

Roselle Park Borough, NJ

Town of Beekman, NY. Credit Strengths. Solid reserve and liquidity levels. Low debt burden with rapid repayment. Credit Challenges

Town of Easton, MA. Credit Strengths. Manageable long-term liabilities. Credit Challenges. Reliance on reserves to address budget gaps

For personal use only

Rating Action: Moody's changes the outlook on FCA Bank's senior debt rating to positive from stable

Butler (Village of), WI

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to UConn GO bonds supported by State of Connecticut; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2018

Findlay City School District, OH

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A3 issuer rating to Nidec Corporation; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 31 Jan 2018

Global Credit Research - 19 Apr 2018

Rating Action: Moody's reviews Depfa ACS Bank's public sector covered bonds for downgrade Global Credit Research - 14 Sep 2016

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aaa IFS rating of New York Life; stable outlook Global Credit Research - 27 Jul 2017

Rating Action: Moody's reviews NORD/LB Luxembourg S.A. - Public-Sector Covered Bonds, direction uncertain 19 Dec 2018

Grinnell College, IA

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades the ratings of Philippine National Bank and Rizal Commercial Bank Global Credit Research - 23 Nov 2017

Siauliu Bankas, AB. Siauliu Bankas capital metrics will strengthen with EBRD s debt-to-equity conversion. ISSUER COMMENT 13 August 2018

Disruption in Higher Education: What Does It Mean For Credit Ratings

Rating Action: Moody's affirms EBRD's Aaa rating, maintains stable outlook 07 Dec 2018

Rating Action: Moody's announces rating actions on student loan ABS backed by FFELP student loans following the update of its rating methodology

Rating Action: Moody's takes rating actions on Irish mortgage covered bonds Global Credit Research - 26 Sep 2016

Township of Tredyffrin, PA

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

PSP Capital Inc. Update to credit analysis. CREDIT OPINION 27 August Update

African Development Bank - Aaa Stable

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades mortgage covered bonds issued by AIB Mortgage Bank and EBS Mortgage Finance Global Credit Research - 29 Nov 2016

Lubbock (City of), TX

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to Trinity Health Credit Group's (MI) Ser bonds; outlook revised to stable

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Bharti's senior unsecured notes to Ba1 and assigns a Ba1 CFR; outlook negative 05 Feb 2019

Rating Action: Moody's changes Hella's outlook to positive; affirms ratings Global Credit Research - 31 Aug 2017

Rating Action: Moody's assigns an A1 insurance financial strength rating to CNP Assurances with a stable outlook 06 Jun 2018

Duquesne University, PA

City of Tega Cay, SC. Annual Comment on Tega Cay RATING. ISSUER COMMENT 23 March 2018

Rating Action: Moody's upgrade Equinor's rating to Aa2 and BCA to a1; stable outlook 09 Aug 2018

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Coty's CFR to Ba3; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 20 Mar 2018

Barcelona, City of. Annual update. Barcelona's good operating performance. B= Budget. PC: Pre-closing. Source: Issuer. Moody's Investors Service.

Somerset Hills School District, NJ

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Baa3 senior unsecured debt ratings of ICICI Bank's Bahrain branch Global Credit Research - 17 Aug 2017

Bothell (City of) WA

Underwriting standards for credit cards and auto loans tighten modestly, a positive

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades NORD/LB's Fuerstenberg preference shares to Caa1(hyb) Global Credit Research - 18 Apr 2018

Cherokee County Board of Education, AL

CIMIC GROUP UPGRADED TO Baa2, OUTLOOK STABLE, BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE

Columbia School District, MO

Special Tax: Transportation-Related

Rating Action: Moody's Changes Sparebanken Vest's Rating Outlook to Stable From Negative

Rating Action: Moody's changes Nicaragua's rating outlook to stable from positive; B2 rating affirmed 13 Jun 2018

Findlay City School District, OH

Port Jefferson Union Free School District, NY

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Intrum Justitia's Ba2 corporate family rating; outlook changed to stable Global Credit Research - 19 Apr 2018

Edison (Township of) NJ

Montgomery County, TX

FMS Wertmanagement Aaa Stable

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Rating Action: Moody's changes outlooks on ratings of 14 Russian financial institutions to stable from negative

Credit Opinion: Municipal Guarantee Board

Rating Action: Moody's changes Colonial's outlook to negative from stable following tender offer for Axiare Global Credit Research - 14 Nov 2017

Westport (Town of) CT

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Berner Kantonalbank's Aa1 deposit and A1 senior unsecured debt ratings

Rating Action: Moody's affirms JAB Holding's Baa1 Issuer rating; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 30 Jan 2018

PT Indosat Tbk. Strong Revenue and Earnings Growth in FY2015 Supports Credit Profile. ISSUER COMMENT 28 March 2016

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Blue Racer's senior notes to B2, rates new notes

Masconomet Regional School District, MA

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades MS Amlin's IFS ratings to A1; stable outlook Global Credit Research - 08 Aug 2017

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Aker BP's rating to Ba1, stable outlook Global Credit Research - 05 Mar 2018

Transcription:

CREDIT OPINION Update North American Development Bank Aa1 Stable Annual Update Summary Rating Rationale Credit strengths underpinning NADB's Aa1 rating include: (1) adequate capitalization; (2) strong liquidity and a policy that ensures adequate resources for meeting debt obligations for at least one year; (3) involvement of the treasury departments of the US and Mexico at the Board level, including loan approvals; and (4) expectation of strong shareholder support in the event of financial stress. The main credit challenges facing NADB are (1) risk management in lending, since the average credit quality of borrowers is not high and the composition of the loan portfolio has shifted to the private sector; and (2) concentration risk in the loan portfolio. Contacts Renzo Merino 212-553-0330 Analyst renzo.merino@moodys.com Steven A. Hess Senior Vice President steven.hess@moodys.com 212-553-4741 Anne Van Praagh 212-553-3744 MD-Sovereign Risk anne.vanpraagh@moodys.com Exhibit 1 NADB's Aa1 stable rating is determined by three factors Source: Moody's Investors Service This Credit Opinion provides a discussion of the credit rating(s) for the NADB and should be read in conjunction with Moody's most recent Credit Analysis and rating information available on Moody's website.

Key Indicators Summary Rating Rationale (continued) We rate the NADB Aa1. The Bank is equally owned by the governments of Mexico (A3 negative) and the United States (Aaa stable) and finances environmental infrastructure projects in the border region of the two countries. This narrow geographic mandate contributes to the Bank's loan portfolio containing more concentration risk than its MDB peers. The Board of Directors, which must approve all loans, includes government officials from both countries and is chaired on a rotating basis by the US Secretary of the Treasury and the Mexican counterpart, the Secretario de Hacienda y Crédito Público. This high-level oversight plays a role in the policies set and risks taken by the Bank and reinforces member support as there is reputation risk for the two governments should NADB experience financial difficulties. The Bank has total capital of $3 billion, of which $405 million is paid-in and the remainder callable. The callable portion of the capital can only be used to repay debt or to make similar payments on loans that the Bank guarantees, and therefore provides considerable protection to bondholders and is a factor in our assignment of the Bank's rating. The Bank's institutional lending policy restricts loans and guarantees to the Bank's subscribed capital, unimpaired reserves, and undistributed surplus. In practice, this threshold is unlikely to be reached due to the Bank's debt limit, which limits the outstanding debt stock to 100% of callable capital plus the minimum liquidity level set by the liquidity policy. The NADB's loan portfolio is now concentrated primarily in Mexican project loans, having expanding lending there over the past year. However, on the state level, Texas (24%) and California (18%) take the bulk of NADB loans, alongside Tamaulipas (22%). Meanwhile, on a sectoral basis, the Bank's portfolio is dominated by renewable energy projects in the US. The quality of the Bank's Mexican loan book is supported by a credit enhancement, known as a Fideicomiso, which establishes a link between the NADB and the Mexican government. As such, the loans are likely to perform more strongly than what the creditworthiness of the underlying borrowing entities would otherwise indicate. However, declining exposure to credit-enhanced loans in Mexico and an increasing share of private loans have driven portfolio quality lower in recent years. The Bank's strong capitalization and liquidity positions significantly mitigate the risks that it faces. For many years, the Bank had exceptionally strong capitalization ratios. However, as the Bank has been growing rapidly its capital adequacy ratios have weakened although remaining strong. Meanwhile, the Bank's liquidity policy is very strong, both in the number of months of coverage (12) and the breadth of coverage of cash outflows. Furthermore, the Bank has historically over-complied with the policy. This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history. 2

Rating Outlook The stable outlook on the NADB's Aa1 rating reflects its strong capitalization and liquidity levels. Reinforcing these strong levels are the bank's conservative risk management policies and practices that set a limit to how much deterioration there could be in its financial metrics. It also reflects the strong support, in both ability and willingness, that the bank enjoys from its two sovereign shareholders, the United States and Mexico. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade An upward reassessment of the rating could arise from a significant and sustained improvement in the credit quality of the bank's loan portfolio or a reduction in concentration risks of the portfolio. Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade As the NADB's loan portfolio continues to grow, with exposure predominantly to the private sector in contrast to its historical focus on municipalities and municipally-owned utilities that received significant credit enhancement from the Mexican fideicomiso trust mechanism, a significant deterioration in asset quality and performance could prompt a rating downgrade. Recent Developments NADB recorded a moderate pace of loan growth in 2015, with gross loans outstanding increasing by 12%. Overall, the Bank's balance sheet expanded by 9.0%, which marked significant deceleration from double-digit growth rates in 2012-13. During 2015, NADB extended 13 new loans, up from 9 in 2014. Going forward, based on the pipeline of committed loans planned for disbursement in 2015 and 2016 and projections thereafter, the Bank expects annual net loan growth to average 11.5% annually during the 2015-2019 period. As envisioned in the Bank's strategic plan, its loan portfolio expansion resulted in continued weakening of its capital adequacy metrics, with equity covering 42.4% of development-related exposure as of year-end, down from 45.8% a year before. On a relative basis, however, NADB's capital position remains strong and in line with the median for multilaterals in the 'Aa' range. The Bank's growth in recent years has been primarily funded through its active bond program. Most recently, NADB issued its first Swiss franc-denominated bond, raising an equivalent US$129 million in April 2015. The issue was five times oversubscribed, pointing to NADB's increasingly entrenched market position. Despite remaining virtually unchanged in 2014 compared to 2013, debt as a share of usable equity increased to 211.7% in 2015. In January 2015, the Board of Directors of NADB announced the support of the governments of the US and Mexico for a general capital increase of $3 billion for the Bank, of which $450 million would come in the form of additional paid-in capital. The capital increase would be apportioned during an estimated period of seven years. The capital increase still requires congressional approval in the US and budget approval in Mexico. Depending on the timing of NADB's borrowing program, the Bank may see its capitalization and leverage ratios temporarily improve in the near term as a result of the capital increase. 3

Rating Methodology and Scorecard Factors 4

Moody's Related Research Credit Analysis: North American Development Bank, May 2016 Sector Focus: Global Funding From Multilateral Development Banks Will Continue To Increase, September 2015 Rating Methodology: Multilateral Development Banks and Other Supranational Entities, 16 December 2013 To access any of these reports, click on the entry above. Note that these references are current as of the date of publication of this report and that more recent reports may be available. All research may not be available to all clients. 5

Authors Renzo Merino Analyst Joshua Grundleger Associate Analyst 6

2016 Moody's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Moody's Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ("MIS") ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody's Publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY'S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody's Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody's Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Investor Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy." Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody's Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY'S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY'S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody's SF Japan K.K. ("MSFJ") is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ("NRSRO"). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. REPORT NUMBER 7 1026717