FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE August 26, 2010

Similar documents
Media Alert. First American CoreLogic Releases Q3 Negative Equity Data

Annual Costs Cost of Care. Home Health Care

Kentucky , ,349 55,446 95,337 91,006 2,427 1, ,349, ,306,236 5,176,360 2,867,000 1,462

Income from U.S. Government Obligations

Checkpoint Payroll Sources All Payroll Sources

State Individual Income Taxes: Personal Exemptions/Credits, 2011

Union Members in New York and New Jersey 2018

Federal Registry. NMLS Federal Registry Quarterly Report Quarter I

Impacts of Prepayment Penalties and Balloon Loans on Foreclosure Starts, in Selected States: Supplemental Tables

Sales Tax Return Filing Thresholds by State

Pay Frequency and Final Pay Provisions

The Costs and Benefits of Half a Loaf: The Economic Effects of Recent Regulation of Debit Card Interchange Fees. Robert J. Shapiro

State Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply

Undocumented Immigrants are:

AIG Benefit Solutions Producer Licensing and Appointment Requirements by State

Q209 NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION. Data as of June 30, 2009

Ability-to-Repay Statutes

Q309 NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION. Data as of September 30, 2009

The Effect of the Federal Cigarette Tax Increase on State Revenue

Motor Vehicle Sales/Use, Tax Reciprocity and Rate Chart-2005

Termination Final Pay Requirements

Federal Rates and Limits

Fingerprint, Biographical Affidavit and Third-Party Verification Reports Requirements

DATA AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

State Income Tax Tables

ATHENE Performance Elite Series of Fixed Index Annuities

Mapping the geography of retirement savings

The table below reflects state minimum wages in effect for 2014, as well as future increases. State Wage Tied to Federal Minimum Wage *

Fingerprint and Biographical Affidavit Requirements

Q Homeowner Confidence Survey Results. May 20, 2010

MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN HAWAII 2013

Providing Subprime Consumers with Access to Credit: Helpful or Harmful? James R. Barth Auburn University

What is your New Financing Statement Fee? What is your Amendment Fee (include termination fee if a different amount)?

2012 RUN Powered by ADP Tax Changes

MEDICAID BUY-IN PROGRAMS

Understanding Oregon s Throwback Rule for Apportioning Corporate Income

STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES

Recourse for Employees Misclassified as Independent Contractors Department for Professional Employees, AFL-CIO

STATE MINIMUM WAGES 2017 MINIMUM WAGE BY STATE

National Foreclosure Report

NOTICE TO MEMBERS CANADIAN DERIVATIVES CORPORATION CANADIENNE DE. Trading by U.S. Residents

White Paper 2018 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES

FHA Manual Underwriting Exceeding 31% / 43% DTI Eligibility Quick Reference

# of Credit Unions As of March 31, 2011

State Minimum Wage Chart (See below for Local/City Minimum Wage Chart)

PAY STATEMENT REQUIREMENTS

TA X FACTS NORTHERN FUNDS 2O17

Metrics and Measurements for State Pension Plans. November 17, 2016 Greg Mennis

Mutual Fund Tax Information

2014 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES HR COMPLIANCE CENTER

Forecasting State and Local Government Spending: Model Re-estimation. January Equation

Nation s Uninsured Rate for Children Drops to Another Historic Low in 2016

Required Training Completion Date. Asset Protection Reciprocity

Do you charge an expedite fee for online filings?

Insurer Participation on ACA Marketplaces,

Residual Income Requirements

J.P. Morgan Funds 2018 Distribution Notice

How Much Would a State Earned Income Tax Credit Cost in Fiscal Year 2018?

IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION

MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN TEXAS 2016

Mutual Fund Tax Information

2018 ABA Commercial Real Estate Survey Report. July 2018

ADDITIONAL REQUIRED TRAINING before proceeding. Annuity Carrier Specific Product Training

State Tax Treatment of Social Security, Pension Income

Minimum Wage Laws in the States - April 3, 2006

Economic Impacts of Wait Times for Commercial Driver s Licenses Skills Tests

# of Credit Unions As of September 30, 2011

EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 6: Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation

Overview of Sales Tax Exemptions for Agricultural Producers in the United States

DFA INVESTMENT DIMENSIONS GROUP INC. DIMENSIONAL INVESTMENT GROUP INC. Institutional Class Shares January 2018

8, ADP,

FAPRI Analysis of Dairy Policy Options for the 2002 Farm Bill Conference

A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency. (hours ethics included)

HAC USDA RURAL DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ACTIVITY. Rural Research Report. Housing Assistance Council FISCAL YEAR 2017 YEAR-END REPORT

Consumer Installment Loan Regulations - State

LexisNexis VIN Services VIN Household

State Social Security Income Pension Income State computation not based on federal. Social Security benefits excluded from taxable income.

Chapter D State and Local Governments

Aetna Individual Direct Pay Commissions Schedule

S T A T E INSURANCE COVERAGE AND PRACTICE SYMPOSIUM DECEMBER 7 8, 2017 NEW YORK, NY. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency

Employer-Funded Individual Health Insurance

Supporting innovation and economic growth. The broad impact of the R&D credit in Prepared by Ernst & Young LLP for the R&D Credit Coalition

ADDITIONAL REQUIRED TRAINING before proceeding. Annuity Carrier Specific Product Training

S T A T E TURNING THE TABLES ON PLAINTIFFS IN TRUCKING LITIGATION APRIL 26 27, 2018 CHICAGO, IL. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency

Year-End Tax Tables Applicable to Form 1099-DIV Page 2 Qualified Dividend Income

Child Care Assistance Spending and Participation in 2016

SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance

A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency. (hours ethics included)

Aiming. Higher. Results from a Scorecard on State Health System Performance 2015 Edition. Douglas McCarthy, David C. Radley, and Susan L.

A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. Pending. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency.

The 2017 CHP Salary Survey

JOB CUTS JUMP 18 PERCENT IN JUNE TO 37,202; UP 8 PERCENT YEAR OVER YEAR

A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency. (hours ethics included)

JANUARY 30 DATA RELEASE WILL CAPTURE ONLY A PORTION OF THE JOBS CREATED OR SAVED BY THE RECOVERY ACT By Michael Leachman

DSH Reduction Allocation Process Flows. DRAFT Based on 5/15/13 NPRM

Revenue Forecasting Practices: Accuracy, Transparency and Political Acceptance

Bulletin. Annuity Requirement and AML Training available through Quest CE

AUGUST MORTGAGE INSURANCE DATA AT A GLANCE

10 yrs. The benefit is capped at 80% of FAS. An elected official may. 2% (first 10 yrs.); or 2.25% (second 10 yrs.); or 2.5% over 20 yrs.

FISCAL FACT Top Marginal Effective Tax Rates By State under Rival Tax Plans from Congressional Democrats and Republicans

Transcription:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE August 26, 2010 Media Contacts Below NEW CORELOGIC DATA SHOWS SECOND CONSECUTIVE QUARTERLY DECLINE IN NEGATIVE EQUITY SANTA ANA, Calif., August 26, 2010 CoreLogic (NYSE: CLGX), a leading provider of consumer, financial and property information and business services, today released negative equity data showing a second consecutive quarterly decline in national negative equity rates. CoreLogic reports that 11 million, or 23 percent, of all residential properties with mortgages were in negative equity at the end of the second quarter of 2010, down from 11.2 million and 24 percent from the first quarter of 2010. Foreclosures, rather than meaningful price appreciation, were the primary driver in the change in negative equity. An additional 2.4 million borrowers had less than five percent equity. Together, negative equity and nearnegative equity mortgages accounted for nearly 28 percent of all residential properties with a mortgage nationwide. Negative equity, often referred to as underwater or upside down, means that borrowers owe more on their mortgages than their homes are worth. Negative equity can occur because of a decline in value, an increase in mortgage debt or a combination of both. Data Highlights Negative equity remains concentrated in five states: Nevada, which had the highest percentage negative equity with 68 percent of all of its mortgaged properties underwater, followed by Arizona (50 percent), Florida (46 percent), Michigan (38 percent) and California (33 percent). The biggest declines in negative equity were concentrated in the hardest hit states. Nevada experienced an 11.8 percentage point decline in negative equity share, followed by California (-1.3), Florida (-1.3), and Arizona (-1.3). About two-thirds of all states experienced a decline in negative equity share. Since peaking in Q4 2009, the number of borrowers in a negative equity position has declined by about 350,000. The declines were primarily due to foreclosures, not the stabilization or small increases in prices in some markets. The largest decrease in negative equity occurred among those with loan-to-value (LTV) ratios in excess of 125 percent, where the number of negative equity borrowers fell to 4.8 million, down from 5 million last quarter. Homes with more equity are appreciating faster than underwater homes. The average values of properties with 50 percent or more equity increased over 1 percent between Q4 2009 and Q2 2010. Properties with 25 to 50 percent in equity increased an average of 0.2 percent in that period. However, values fell for every segment in negative equity, with the biggest value decline occurring for properties that are 50 percent or more in negative equity.

In addition to driving foreclosures, negative equity reduces homeowner mobility. Since the peak in home sales in 2005, non-distressed sales have dramatically declined and there is a clear relationship between the decline in non-distressed sales and the level of negative equity at the zip code and state level. At low levels of negative equity there are moderate and varied declines in non-distressed sales across most states as it reflects state macroeconomic fundamentals. At higher levels of negative equity, the non-distressed declines have been much larger, which implies that that the 11 million negative equity properties have reduced homeowners ability to move. The 11 million negative equity properties are backed by $2.9 trillion in mortgage debt outstanding (MDO). On an MDO dollar basis, the negative equity share was 33 percent percent and the total dollar value of negative equity was $766 billion. "Negative equity continues to both drive foreclosures and impede the housing market recovery. With nearly 5 million borrowers currently in severe negative equity, defaults will remain at a high level for an extended period of time," said Mark Fleming, chief economist with CoreLogic.

Table 1: Negative by State* Properties With a Mortgage Outstanding $ Outstanding Negative Near** Negative Negative Near** Negative Total Property Mortgage Debt Net Homeowner Loan-to-Value State Mortgages Mortgages Mortgages Share Share Value Outstanding Ratio Alabama 337,954 33,166 18,481 9.8% 5.5% 65,385,822,822 43,588,978,733 21,796,844,089 67% Alaska 85,240 9,078 4,530 10.6% 5.3% 22,970,887,413 15,441,319,127 7,529,568,286 67% Arizona 1,348,944 675,049 63,023 5 4.7% 265,926,758,946 249,360,883,352 16,565,875,594 94% Arkansas 235,826 28,364 14,151 12.0% 6.0% 36,745,699,130 27,200,577,820 9,545,121,310 74% California 6,889,207 2,258,108 285,804 32.8% 4.1% 2,884,045,039,659 2,028,954,937,485 855,090,102,174 70% Colorado 1,126,785 221,819 91,459 19.7% 8.1% 302,325,148,025 218,059,863,706 84,265,284,319 72% Connecticut 812,241 97,701 30,591 12.0% 3.8% 292,556,245,651 170,787,537,307 121,768,708,344 58% Delaware 178,507 24,118 8,916 13.5% 5.0% 46,761,337,985 31,799,300,516 14,962,037,469 68% Florida 4,505,328 2,092,485 179,753 46.4% 4.0% 859,032,172,741 771,069,400,288 87,962,772,453 90% Georgia 1,601,921 449,969 123,863 28.1% 7.7% 319,942,261,814 256,030,665,794 63,911,596,020 80% Hawaii 230,548 24,765 8,204 10.7% 3.6% 118,401,295,492 65,543,206,662 52,858,088,830 55% Idaho 242,694 57,615 12,538 23.7% 5.2% 48,968,685,624 35,649,637,071 13,319,048,553 73% Illinois 2,233,520 440,258 110,570 19.7% 5.0% 535,748,587,581 380,545,818,984 155,202,768,597 71% Indiana 594,651 65,410 28,503 11.0% 4.8% 90,687,152,179 63,228,196,877 27,458,955,302 70% Iowa 323,874 28,390 14,153 8.8% 4.4% 49,154,126,874 32,935,232,493 16,218,894,381 67% Kansas 293,798 31,663 15,853 10.8% 5.4% 53,330,918,308 37,499,704,782 15,831,213,526 70% Kentucky 274,786 23,494 14,183 8.5% 5.2% 47,036,810,827 31,667,229,374 15,369,581,453 67% Louisiana NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Maine NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Maryland 1,362,982 302,741 67,891 22.2% 5.0% 434,610,946,351 299,830,892,550 134,780,053,801 69% Massachusetts 1,495,673 224,814 52,618 15.0% 3.5% 544,966,680,027 328,941,183,432 216,025,496,595 60% Michigan 1,381,308 524,478 78,242 38.0% 5.7% 198,880,656,696 170,247,568,378 28,633,088,318 86% Minnesota 545,466 88,877 27,186 16.3% 5.0% 123,092,080,749 80,124,380,254 42,967,700,495 65% Mississippi NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Missouri 778,338 120,529 44,162 15.5% 5.7% 137,910,366,283 98,513,900,762 39,396,465,521 71% Montana 111,310 8,594 3,790 7.7% 3.4% 28,160,846,430 16,776,265,572 11,384,580,858 60% Nebraska 220,850 20,621 12,420 9.3% 5.6% 35,400,463,756 25,829,984,117 9,570,479,639 73% Nevada 591,996 403,073 21,336 68.1% 3.6% 104,209,898,971 125,449,541,260-21,239,642,289 120% New Hampshire 209,611 38,587 11,769 18.4% 5.6% 51,220,970,265 35,545,408,769 15,675,561,496 69% New Jersey 1,884,563 289,810 79,311 15.4% 4.2% 678,172,655,977 416,537,737,945 261,634,918,032 61% New Mexico 232,706 28,289 10,663 12.2% 4.6% 55,123,990,155 36,336,070,041 18,787,920,114 66% New York 1,828,481 129,401 39,589 7.1% 2.2% 827,534,637,640 411,221,082,614 416,313,555,026 50% North Carolina 1,506,524 156,061 99,812 10.4% 6.6% 314,994,052,780 221,099,255,063 93,894,797,717 70% North Dakota 46,636 3,446 1,393 7.4% 3.0% 7,851,679,565 4,711,176,131 3,140,503,434 60% Ohio 2,210,116 436,351 136,589 19.7% 6.2% 325,407,370,046 241,972,041,209 83,435,328,837 74% Oklahoma 405,599 23,423 13,289 5.8% 3.3% 59,888,715,697 42,046,956,847 17,841,758,850 70% Oregon 695,439 109,135 38,946 15.7% 5.6% 180,105,676,362 123,683,325,688 56,422,350,674 69% Pennsylvania 1,782,995 130,339 56,793 7.3% 3.2% 399,571,880,840 247,082,341,529 152,489,539,311 62% Rhode Island 227,689 46,188 8,187 20.3% 3.6% 64,249,340,892 39,644,584,712 24,604,756,180 62% South Carolina 593,993 84,689 36,310 14.3% 6.1% 131,015,095,864 92,388,481,647 38,626,614,217 71% South Dakota NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Tennessee 956,803 131,786 67,126 13.8% 7.0% 165,637,381,320 117,327,235,776 48,310,145,544 71% Texas 3,249,196 368,207 195,056 11.3% 6.0% 593,873,025,804 413,341,321,095 180,531,704,709 70% Utah 470,149 96,083 30,080 20.4% 6.4% 114,790,817,943 84,283,165,781 30,507,652,162 73% Vermont NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Virginia 1,249,480 283,498 73,105 22.7% 5.9% 417,280,323,596 295,555,072,813 121,725,250,783 71% Washington 1,407,297 214,468 76,383 15.2% 5.4% 441,737,928,305 293,421,788,044 148,316,140,261 66% Washington, DC 100,339 15,547 4,543 15.5% 4.5% 48,721,339,420 28,716,753,882 20,004,585,538 59% West Virginia NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Wisconsin 606,962 83,027 30,539 13.7% 5.0% 117,440,384,571 79,139,983,943 38,300,400,628 67% Wyoming NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Nation 47,802,783 10,971,224 2,356,100 23.0% 4.9% 12,707,027,160,944 8,875,764,627,185 3,831,262,533,759 70% * This data only includes properties with a mortgage. Non-mortgaged properties are by definition not included. ** Defined as properties within 5% of being in a negative equity position.

Percent of Homeowners with a Mortgage 12.0% 1 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% Figure 1: Distribution of Home Q1 2010 Q2 2010 0 % to 5% 0 % to 5% 5 % to 10% 10 % to 15% 15 % to 20% 20 % to 25% 25 % Or More Distribution Percent of Homeowners with a Mortgage 6 5 4 3 2 1 Figure 2: Negative 25% or More Q1 2010 Q2 2010 Nevada Arizona Florida California Michigan

0% Figure 3: Impact of Negative on Homeowner Mobility, by State 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 10% North Dakota 20% Percent Change in Non Distressed Sales From Peak to Current* 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% California Florida Nevada 80% 90% Negative Share *Representsthe percent change in non distressed sales between 2005/06 to the current 12 month trend through June 2010. The size of the bubble reflects the size of the aggregate mortgage debt outstanding.

1.5% Figure 4: Q4 2009 to Q2 2010 Percent Change in Home Values by Segment 1.0% 0.5% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 50% to 100% 25% to 50% 5% to 25% 0% to 5% 0% to 5% 5 % to 10% 10 % to 15% 15 % to 20% 20 % to 25% 25 % to 50% 50% or More Distribution Figure 5: Pre Foreclosure Rate* by Segment and Owner Type 18.0% 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% Positive Negative Investor Occupied Owner Occupied 1 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% LTV < 75% 75% to 95% 95% to 100% 100% to 105% to 110% to 115% to 105% 110% 115% 120% Loan to Value Ratio (LTV) 120% to 125% * A pre foreclosure is a Notice of Default (NOD) or the first step in the public recordation of default. There are some NODs for loans wi th LTVs below 100% wh ich is indicative of distress, but that does not necessarily mean those borrowers will proceed to foreclosure and REO given the borrower has equity. 125% to 150% > 150% Methodology: CoreLogic data includes 47 million properties with a mortgage, which accounts for over 85 percent of all mortgages in the U.S.** CoreLogic used its public record data as the source of the mortgage debt outstanding (MDO) and it includes 1 st mortgage liens and junior mortgage liens and is adjusted for amortization and home equity utilization in order to capture the true level of mortgage debt outstanding for each property. The current value was estimated by using the CoreLogic Automated Valuation Models (AVM) for residential properties. The data was filtered to include only properties valued between $30,000 and $30 million because AVM accuracy tends to quickly worsen outside of this value range.

The amount of equity for each property was determined by subtracting the property s estimated current value from the mortgage debt outstanding. If the mortgage debt was greater than the estimated value, then the property is in a negative equity position. The data was created at the property level and aggregated to higher levels of geography. ** Only data for mortgaged residential properties that have an AVM value is presented. There are several states where the public record, AVM or mortgage coverage is thin. Although coverage is thin, these states account for fewer than 5 percent of the total population of the U.S. Source: CoreLogic. The data provided is for use only by the primary recipient or the primary recipient's publication or broadcast. This data may not be re-sold, republished or licensed to any other source, including publications and sources owned by the primary recipient's parent company without prior written permission from CoreLogic. Any CoreLogic data used for publication or broadcast, in whole or in part, must be sourced as coming from CoreLogic, a real estate data and analytics company. For use with broadcast or web content, the citation must directly accompany first reference of the data. If the data is illustrated wtih maps, charts, graphs or other visual elements, the CoreLogic logo must be included on screen or web site. For questions, analysis or interpretation of the data contact Lori Guyton at lguyton@cvic.com or Bill Campbell at bill@campbelllewis.com. Data provided may not be modified without the prior written permission of CoreLogic. Do not use the data in any unlawful manner. This data is compiled from public records, contributory databases and proprietary analytics, and its accuracy is dependent upon these sources. About CoreLogic CoreLogic is a leading provider of consumer, financial and property information, analytics and services to business and government. The company combines public, contributory and proprietary data to develop predictive decision analytics and provide business services that bring dynamic insight and transparency to the markets it serves. CoreLogic has built the largest and most comprehensive U.S. real estate, mortgage application, fraud, and loan performance databases and is a recognized leading provider of mortgage and automotive credit reporting, property tax, valuation, flood determination, and geospatial analytics and services. More than one million users rely on CoreLogic to assess risk, support underwriting, investment and marketing decisions, prevent fraud, and improve business performance in their daily operations. Formerly, the information solutions group of The First American Corporation, CoreLogic began trading under the ticker CLGX on the NYSE on June 2, 2010. The company, headquartered in Santa Ana, Calif., has more than 10,000 employees globally with 2009 revenues of $2 billion. For more information visit www.corelogic.com. CoreLogic is a registered trademark of CoreLogic, Inc. # # # Media Contacts: For real estate industry and trade media: For general news media: Bill Campbell Lori Guyton bill@campbelllewis.com lguyton@crosbyvolmer.com (212) 995.8057 (office) (901) 277.6066 (917) 328.6539 (mobile) mailto:bill@campbelllewis.commailto:lguyton@crosbyvolmer.com