WesVar Analysis Example Replication C7

Similar documents
WesVar uses repeated replication variance estimation methods exclusively and as a result does not offer the Taylor Series Linearization approach.

The Affordable Care Act Has Led To Significant Gains In Health Insurance Coverage And Access To Care For Young Adults

The SAS System 11:03 Monday, November 11,

GGraph. Males Only. Premium. Experience. GGraph. Gender. 1 0: R 2 Linear = : R 2 Linear = Page 1

ASDA2 ANALYSIS EXAMPLE REPLICATION SPSS C5

Stat 328, Summer 2005

SAS Simple Linear Regression Example

Technical Documentation for Household Demographics Projection

CHAPTER 4 DATA ANALYSIS Data Hypothesis

SFSU FIN822 Project 1

Point-Biserial and Biserial Correlations

Dummy Variables. 1. Example: Factors Affecting Monthly Earnings

> attach(grocery) > boxplot(sales~discount, ylab="sales",xlab="discount")

XLSTAT TIP SHEET FOR BUSINESS STATISTICS CENGAGE LEARNING

Problem Set 2. PPPA 6022 Due in class, on paper, March 5. Some overall instructions:

Non-linearities in Simple Regression

Econ 371 Problem Set #4 Answer Sheet. 6.2 This question asks you to use the results from column (1) in the table on page 213.

Labor Force Participation and the Wage Gap Detailed Notes and Code Econometrics 113 Spring 2014

Changes in Stock Ownership by Race/Hispanic Status,

To be two or not be two, that is a LOGISTIC question

ARIMA ANALYSIS WITH INTERVENTIONS / OUTLIERS

Quantitative Techniques Term 2

ECO671, Spring 2014, Sample Questions for First Exam

HuffPost: Midterm elections March 23-26, US Adults

11. Logistic modeling of proportions

Table 4. Probit model of union membership. Probit coefficients are presented below. Data from March 2008 Current Population Survey.

Spring, Beta and Regression

An Evaluation of Nonresponse Adjustment Cells for the Household Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) 1

Summary of Statistical Analysis Tools EDAD 5630

Risk Analysis. å To change Benchmark tickers:

STATISTICS 110/201, FALL 2017 Homework #5 Solutions Assigned Mon, November 6, Due Wed, November 15

CHAPTER 6 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Final Exam, section 1. Thursday, May hour, 30 minutes

Lloyds TSB. Derek Hull, John Adam & Alastair Jones

Relationship Between Household Nonresponse, Demographics, and Unemployment Rate in the Current Population Survey.

Online appendix for W. Kip Viscusi, Joel Huber, and Jason Bell, Assessing Whether There Is a Cancer Premium for the Value of a Statistical Life

R & R Study. Chapter 254. Introduction. Data Structure

Study 2: data analysis. Example analysis using R

Dummy variables 9/22/2015. Are wages different across union/nonunion jobs. Treatment Control Y X X i identifies treatment

Jacob: The illustrative worksheet shows the values of the simulation parameters in the upper left section (Cells D5:F10). Is this for documentation?

Discrete Choice Modeling

Rescaling results of nonlinear probability models to compare regression coefficients or variance components across hierarchically nested models

West Coast Stata Users Group Meeting, October 25, 2007

Massachusetts Household Survey on Health Insurance Status, 2007

Name: 1. Use the data from the following table to answer the questions that follow: (10 points)

An Integrated U.S. National Mortality Database by Immigration status - Promises and Issues

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novapdf printer (

Professor Brad Jones University of Arizona POL 681, SPRING 2004 INTERACTIONS and STATA: Companion To Lecture Notes on Statistical Interactions

The American Panel Survey. Study Description and Technical Report Public Release 1 November 2013

Two-Sample T-Test for Superiority by a Margin

When comparing this study s results with the HMDA data to the results found in the previous 2001 report, small changes have been found.

Two-Sample T-Test for Non-Inferiority

Introduction to Population Modeling

Recreational marijuana and collision claim frequencies

CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY

REGIONAL WORKSHOP ON TRAFFIC FORECASTING AND ECONOMIC PLANNING

Maximum Likelihood Estimation

Data screening, transformations: MRC05

Aging in America: Income and Assets of People on Medicare

Final Exam - section 1. Thursday, December hours, 30 minutes

United Way Worldwide: MyFreeTaxes Survey November 18-23, Report Date: January 28, 2016

Economics 413: Economic Forecast and Analysis Department of Economics, Finance and Legal Studies University of Alabama

FIGURE I.1 / Per Capita Gross Domestic Product and Unemployment Rates. Year

Tests for Intraclass Correlation

Introduction to Survey Weights for National Adult Tobacco Survey. Sean Hu, MD., MS., DrPH. Office on Smoking and Health

Statistics 101: Section L - Laboratory 6

COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION

Appendix Table 1: Rate of Uninsurance by Select Demographics (2015 to 2017)

hhid marst age1 age2 sex1 sex2

Transport Data Analysis and Modeling Methodologies

List of figures. I General information 1

Calculating the Probabilities of Member Engagement

Linear regression model

Package rpms. May 5, 2018

Module 9: Single-level and Multilevel Models for Ordinal Responses. Stata Practical 1

Stat 401XV Exam 3 Spring 2017

EXST7015: Multiple Regression from Snedecor & Cochran (1967) RAW DATA LISTING

Let us assume that we are measuring the yield of a crop plant on 5 different plots at 4 different observation times.

COMPREHENSIVE WRITTEN EXAMINATION, PAPER III FRIDAY AUGUST 18, 2006, 9:00 A.M. 1:00 P.M. STATISTICS 174 QUESTIONS

Data Mining: An Overview of Methods and Technologies for Increasing Profits in Direct Marketing

Unit 5: Study Guide Multilevel models for macro and micro data MIMAS The University of Manchester

EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 6: Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation

Chapter 11 Part 6. Correlation Continued. LOWESS Regression

The FREQ Procedure. Table of Sex by Gym Sex(Sex) Gym(Gym) No Yes Total Male Female Total

2SLS HATCO SPSS, STATA and SHAZAM. Example by Eddie Oczkowski. August 2001

tm / / / / / / / / / / / / Statistics/Data Analysis User: Klick Project: Limited Dependent Variables{space -6}

Credit history Bad credit history can discourage an individual s chances of being approved for a loan.

The Family Gap phenomenon: does having children impact on parents labour market outcomes?

What America Is Thinking Access Virginia Fall 2013

Advanced Econometrics

Review questions for Multinomial Logit/Probit, Tobit, Heckit, Quantile Regressions

Module 4 Bivariate Regressions

What America Is Thinking On Energy Issues February 2016

What America Is Thinking About Energy Issues February 2016 Presented by: Harris Poll

COMPARISON of WITH- REPLACEMENT and WITHOUT- REPLACEMENT VARIANCE ESTIMATES for a COMPLEX SURVEY

Loss Simulation Model Testing and Enhancement

Performance of Credit Risk Management in Indian Commercial Banks

Regression Review and Robust Regression. Slides prepared by Elizabeth Newton (MIT)

Quant Econ Pset 2: Logit

Lecture 21: Logit Models for Multinomial Responses Continued

Transcription:

WesVar Analysis Example Replication C7 WesVar 5.1 is primarily a point and click application and though a text file of commands can be used in the WesVar (V5.1) batch processing environment, all examples presented here use the GUI method. For more information on the batch processing approach, see the WesVar documentation addendum for V5.1. Due to use of GUI method, no syntax is presented prior to results. Typically, WesVar results and setups are stored in WesVar workbooks. The analysis example replication documents include selected parts of the workbook output to highlight key results. For more on additional outputs and program features, see the WesVar documentation. 1

Output WesVar Analysis Example Replication C7 Note Codes for Race, Age and Marital Status are reversed to match Stata output. Original codes are and reversed are: Race/Ethnicity 1=Mexican-Am 2=Other Hispanic 3=NH White 4=NH Black 5= Other Race Marital Status 1=Currently Married 2=Previously Married 3=Never Married Gender 1=Male 2=Female Reversed Codes are simply the reversed of original. Example 7.5 Bivariate Testing, Model Parameter Estimates and F Tests (Each model is run as a separate bivariate linear model) Regression Coefficients PARAMETER STANDARD ERROR TEST FOR H0: PARAMETER ESTIMATE OF ESTIMATE PARAMETER=0 PROB> T LOWER 95% UPPER 95% agec 0.039 0.019 2.083 0.053-0.001 0.079 rev_race.1 1.306 0.704 1.854 0.081-0.180 2.791 rev_race.2 2.290 0.704 3.253 0.005 0.805 3.776 rev_race.3 2.185 0.748 2.922 0.009 0.608 3.762 rev_race.4-0.155 1.508-0.103 0.919-3.337 3.027 r_gender.1-2.200 0.568-3.874 0.001-3.399-1.002 r_marcat.1-1.121 0.842-1.331 0.201-2.897 0.655 r_marcat.2-0.145 0.698-0.208 0.838-1.618 1.328 Significance Tests TEST F VALUE NUM. DF DENOM. DF PROB>F agec 4.340 1 17 0.053 rev_race[5] 3.875 4 14 0.025 r_gender[2] 15.007 1 17 0.001 r_marcat[3] 0.852 2 16 0.445 2

Example 7.5 Naive Analysis Ignoring Sample Design Features, Not Easily Done in WesVar Example 7.5 Weighted Regression Analysis, Not Easily Done in WesVar Regression Models 3

Example 7.5 Appropriate Analysis using All Sample Design Features WESVAR VERSION NUMBER : v5.1.18 TIME THE JOB EXECUTED : 14:12:04 06/30/2017 INPUT DATASET NAME : P:\ASDA 2\Data sets\nhanes 2011_2012\c7_nhanes_r.var TIME THE INPUT DATASET CREATED : 13:13:17 06/30/2017 FULL SAMPLE WEIGHT : WTMEC2YR REPLICATE WEIGHTS : RPL01...RPL31 VARIANCE ESTIMATION METHOD : JKn JKn FACTOR(S) : 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.50 TYPE OF ANALYSIS : LINEAR VALUE OF ALPHA (CONFIDENCE LEVEL %) : 0.05000 (95.00000 %) OPTION OUTPUT REPLICATE COEFFICIENTS : OFF OPTION OUTPUT ITERATION HISTORY : OFF MODEL(S): bpxdi1_1 = r_gender[2] agec rev_race[5] NUMBER OF REPLICATES : 31 NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS READ : 9756 WEIGHTED NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS READ : 306590680.995 MODEL : bpxdi1_1 = r_gender[2] agec rev_race[5] Class Variable Index : r_gender.1 : 1 r_gender.2 : 2 rev_race.1 : 1 rev_race.2 : 2 rev_race.3 : 3 rev_race.4 : 4 rev_race.5 : 5 4

Model Fit MODEL : 4.852e+08 ERROR : 2.736e+10 TOTAL : 2.785e+10 R_SQUARE VALUE : 0.017 Parameter Estimates (Note that Marital Status is removed from model.) PARAMETER STANDARD ERROR TEST FOR H0: PARAMETER ESTIMATE OF ESTIMATE PARAMETER=0 PROB> T LOWER 95% UPPER 95% INTERCEPT 71.149 0.519 136.980 0.000 70.053 72.245 r_gender.1-2.291 0.549-4.177 0.001-3.448-1.134 agec 0.037 0.021 1.768 0.095-0.007 0.081 rev_race.1 1.262 0.706 1.787 0.092-0.228 2.752 rev_race.2 2.302 0.665 3.462 0.003 0.899 3.705 rev_race.3 1.904 0.813 2.341 0.032 0.188 3.620 rev_race.4-0.141 1.425-0.099 0.922-3.148 2.865 Note: Ouput residuals and predicted values are not easily produced in WesVar nor are plots based on specific models. As a result, diagnostic plots of residuals v. Predicted values are not shown here. 5

Example 7.5 Add Age Squared Term to Model with All Design Features Included WESVAR VERSION NUMBER : v5.1.18 TIME THE JOB EXECUTED : 14:28:54 06/30/2017 INPUT DATASET NAME : P:\ASDA 2\Data sets\nhanes 2011_2012\c7_nhanes_r.var TIME THE INPUT DATASET CREATED : 13:13:17 06/30/2017 FULL SAMPLE WEIGHT : WTMEC2YR REPLICATE WEIGHTS : RPL01...RPL31 VARIANCE ESTIMATION METHOD : JKn JKn FACTOR(S) : 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.50 TYPE OF ANALYSIS : LINEAR VALUE OF ALPHA (CONFIDENCE LEVEL %) : 0.05000 (95.00000 %) OPTION OUTPUT REPLICATE COEFFICIENTS : OFF OPTION OUTPUT ITERATION HISTORY : OFF MODEL(S): bpxdi1_1 = agec agecsq r_gender[2] rev_race[5] NUMBER OF REPLICATES : 31 NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS READ : 9756 WEIGHTED NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS READ : 306590680.995 MODEL : bpxdi1_1 = agec agecsq r_gender[2] rev_race[5] Class Variable Index : r_gender.1 : 1 r_gender.2 : 2 rev_race.1 : 1 rev_race.2 : 2 rev_race.3 : 3 rev_race.4 : 4 rev_race.5 : 5 6

Model Output MODEL : 3.176e+09 ERROR : 2.467e+10 TOTAL : 2.785e+10 R_SQUARE VALUE : 0.114 PARAMETER STANDARD ERROR TEST FOR H0: PARAMETER ESTIMATE OF ESTIMATE PARAMETER=0 PROB> T LOWER 95% UPPER 95% INTERCEPT 74.462 0.567 131.275 0.000 73.266 75.659 agec 0.075 0.016 4.772 0.000 0.042 0.108 agecsq -0.012 0.001-16.226 0.000-0.013-0.010 r_gender.1-2.169 0.490-4.424 0.000-3.204-1.135 rev_race.1 1.410 0.686 2.055 0.056-0.038 2.857 rev_race.2 2.511 0.736 3.411 0.003 0.958 4.064 rev_race.3 2.084 0.862 2.417 0.027 0.265 3.904 rev_race.4 0.218 1.263 0.173 0.865-2.446 2.882 TEST F VALUE NUM. DF DENOM. DF PROB>F OVERALL FIT 159.833 7 11 0.000 agec 22.772 1 17 0.000 agecsq 263.273 1 17 0.000 r_gender[2] 19.574 1 17 0.000 rev_race[5] 3.170 4 14 0.047 7

Example 7.5 Test of Age X Race Interactions and Age X Gender Interactions (Race Entered First and Retained, then Gender Added in Next Model) WESVAR VERSION NUMBER : v5.1.18 TIME THE JOB EXECUTED : 14:52:06 06/30/2017 INPUT DATASET NAME : P:\ASDA 2\Data sets\nhanes 2011_2012\c7_nhanes_r.var TIME THE INPUT DATASET CREATED : 13:13:17 06/30/2017 FULL SAMPLE WEIGHT : WTMEC2YR REPLICATE WEIGHTS : RPL01...RPL31 VARIANCE ESTIMATION METHOD : JKn JKn FACTOR(S) : 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.50 TYPE OF ANALYSIS : LINEAR VALUE OF ALPHA (CONFIDENCE LEVEL %) : 0.05000 (95.00000 %) OPTION OUTPUT REPLICATE COEFFICIENTS : OFF OPTION OUTPUT ITERATION HISTORY : OFF MODEL(S): bpxdi1_1 = agec agecsq r_gender[2] rev_race[5] agec * rev_race[5] agecsq * rev_race[5] NUMBER OF REPLICATES : 31 NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS READ : 9756 WEIGHTED NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS READ : 306590680.995 MODEL : bpxdi1_1 = agec agecsq r_gender[2] rev_race[5] agec * rev_race[5] agecsq * rev_race[5] Class Variable Index : r_gender.1 : 1 r_gender.2 : 2 rev_race.1 : 1 rev_race.2 : 2 rev_race.3 : 3 rev_race.4 : 4 rev_race.5 : 5 8

Model Output TEST F VALUE NUM. DF DENOM. DF PROB>F OVERALL FIT 180.135 15 3 0.001 agec 37.826 1 17 0.000 agecsq 255.606 1 17 0.000 r_gender[2] 19.515 1 17 0.000 rev_race[5] 3.897 4 14 0.025 agec*rev_race[5] 2.802 4 14 0.067 agecsq*rev_race[5] 5.664 4 14 0.006 Test of Age*Race 6.199 8 10 0.005 9

Example 7.5 Final Model with Main Effects and Age X Race and Gender Interactions WESVAR VERSION NUMBER : v5.1.18 TIME THE JOB EXECUTED : 08:25:12 07/01/2017 INPUT DATASET NAME : P:\ASDA 2\Data sets\nhanes 2011_2012\c7_nhanes_r.var TIME THE INPUT DATASET CREATED : 13:13:17 06/30/2017 FULL SAMPLE WEIGHT : WTMEC2YR REPLICATE WEIGHTS : RPL01...RPL31 VARIANCE ESTIMATION METHOD : JKn JKn FACTOR(S) : 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.50 TYPE OF ANALYSIS : LINEAR VALUE OF ALPHA (CONFIDENCE LEVEL %) : 0.05000 (95.00000 %) OPTION OUTPUT REPLICATE COEFFICIENTS : OFF OPTION OUTPUT ITERATION HISTORY : OFF MODEL(S): bpxdi1_1 = bpxdi1_1 = agec agecsq r_gender[2] rev_race[5] agec* r_gender[2] agecsq * r_gender[2] agec * rev_race[5] agecsq * rev_race[5] NUMBER OF REPLICATES : 31 NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS READ : 9756 WEIGHTED NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS READ : 306590680.995 MODEL : bpxdi1_1 = agec agecsq r_gender[2] rev_race[5] agec* r_gender[2] agecsq * r_gender[2] agec * rev_race[5] agecsq * rev_race[5] Class Variable Index : r_gender.1 : 1 r_gender.2 : 2 rev_race.1 : 1 rev_race.2 : 2 rev_race.3 : 3 rev_race.4 : 4 rev_race.5 : 5 10

OPTIONS : Intercept, No Standardized Coefficient, Degrees of Freedom = 17 t VALUE : 2.110 TEST(S) : TEST1 : agec*r_gender.1=0, agecsq*r_gender.1=0, agec*rev_race.1=0,agec*rev_race.2=0, agec*rev_race.3=0, agec*rev_race.4=0, agecsq*rev_race.1=0, agecsq*rev_race.2=0, agecsq*rev_race.3=0, agecsq*rev_race.4=0 Age X Gender : agec*r_gender.1=0, agecsq*r_gender.1=0 BY : age18p = 0 MISSING : 2328 (UNWEIGHTED) 36827543.920597 (WEIGHTED) NONMISSING : 1564 (UNWEIGHTED) 37760598.029429 (WEIGHTED) BY : age18p = 1 MISSING : 752 (UNWEIGHTED) 19254624.698878 (WEIGHTED) NONMISSING : 5112 (UNWEIGHTED) 212747914.346476 (WEIGHTED) 11

Model Output MODEL : 3.351e+09 ERROR : 2.450e+10 TOTAL : 2.785e+10 R_SQUARE VALUE : 0.120 PARAMETER STANDARD ERROR TEST FOR H0: PARAMETER ESTIMATE OF ESTIMATE PARAMETER=0 PROB> T LOWER 95% UPPER 95% INTERCEPT 75.346 0.828 90.990 0.000 73.599 77.094 agec 0.039 0.043 0.919 0.371-0.051 0.129 agecsq -0.015 0.002-7.845 0.000-0.019-0.011 r_gender.1-3.195 0.762-4.192 0.001-4.803-1.587 rev_race.1 1.144 0.892 1.283 0.217-0.738 3.026 rev_race.2 3.450 0.969 3.560 0.002 1.406 5.494 rev_race.3 1.461 0.923 1.583 0.132-0.486 3.408 rev_race.4 0.271 0.956 0.284 0.780-1.746 2.289 agec*r_gender.1 0.045 0.023 1.950 0.068-0.004 0.095 agecsq*r_gender.1 0.003 0.002 2.033 0.058-0.000 0.007 agec*rev_race.1 0.015 0.052 0.287 0.777-0.095 0.124 agec*rev_race.2 0.035 0.042 0.828 0.419-0.053 0.123 agec*rev_race.3-0.004 0.056-0.080 0.937-0.123 0.114 agec*rev_race.4 0.050 0.055 0.906 0.378-0.066 0.165 agecsq*rev_race.1 0.001 0.003 0.466 0.647-0.005 0.008 agecsq*rev_race.2-0.002 0.002-1.125 0.276-0.007 0.002 agecsq*rev_race.3 0.003 0.002 1.436 0.169-0.001 0.007 agecsq*rev_race.4 0.001 0.004 0.229 0.821-0.007 0.009 TEST F VALUE NUM. DF DENOM. DF PROB>F OVERALL FIT 75.544 17 1 0.090 agec 32.758 1 17 0.000 agecsq 252.795 1 17 0.000 r_gender[2] 17.575 1 17 0.001 rev_race[5] 4.169 4 14 0.020 agec*r_gender[2] 3.804 1 17 0.068 agecsq*r_gender[2] 4.132 1 17 0.058 agec*rev_race[5] 2.214 4 14 0.120 agecsq*rev_race[5] 5.226 4 14 0.009 Age X Race 5.705 10 8 0.011 Age X Gender 4.875 2 16 0.022 NOTE: No additional regression diagnostics available from WesVar, could be done using other software such as Stata or SAS. 12

Example 7.5 Q Weighted Model Using Pfefferman Method (Data set prepared using SAS) WESVAR VERSION NUMBER : v5.1.18 TIME THE JOB EXECUTED : 11:05:15 07/01/2017 INPUT DATASET NAME : P:\ASDA 2\Data sets\nhanes 2011_2012\c7_nhanes_q_r.var TIME THE INPUT DATASET CREATED : 11:01:27 07/01/2017 FULL SAMPLE WEIGHT : q_wtmec2yr REPLICATE WEIGHTS : RPL01...RPL31 VARIANCE ESTIMATION METHOD : JKn JKn FACTOR(S) : 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.50 TYPE OF ANALYSIS : LINEAR VALUE OF ALPHA (CONFIDENCE LEVEL %) : 0.05000 (95.00000 %) OPTION OUTPUT REPLICATE COEFFICIENTS : OFF OPTION OUTPUT ITERATION HISTORY : OFF MODEL(S): bpxdi1_1 = agecsq agec r_gender[2] r_ridreth1[5] agec*r_gender[2] agecsq*r_gender[2] agec*r_ridreth1[5] agecsq*r_ridreth1[5] NUMBER OF REPLICATES : 31 NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS READ : 9756 WEIGHTED NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS READ : 9807.001 MODEL : bpxdi1_1 = agecsq agec r_gender[2] r_ridreth1[5] agec*r_gender[2] agecsq*r_gender[2] agec*r_ridreth1[5] agecsq*r_ridreth1[5] Class Variable Index : r_gender.1 : 1 r_gender.2 : 2 r_ridreth1.1 : 1 r_ridreth1.2 : 2 r_ridreth1.3 : 3 r_ridreth1.4 : 4 r_ridreth1.5 : 5 13

Model Output MODEL : 119442.196 ERROR : 706589.857 TOTAL : 826032.053 R_SQUARE VALUE : 0.145 PARAMETER STANDARD ERROR TEST FOR H0: PARAMETER ESTIMATE OF ESTIMATE PARAMETER=0 PROB> T LOWER 95% UPPER 95% INTERCEPT 75.413 0.780 96.624 0.000 73.767 77.060 agecsq -0.015 0.002-8.390 0.000-0.019-0.011 agec 0.047 0.043 1.094 0.289-0.043 0.137 r_gender.1-3.429 0.634-5.406 0.000-4.767-2.091 r_ridreth1.1 1.238 0.888 1.394 0.181-0.635 3.111 r_ridreth1.2 3.566 0.997 3.578 0.002 1.463 5.669 r_ridreth1.3 1.501 0.904 1.659 0.115-0.407 3.409 r_ridreth1.4 0.248 0.992 0.250 0.806-1.846 2.341 agec*r_gender.1 0.034 0.026 1.301 0.210-0.021 0.090 agecsq*r_gender.1 0.003 0.002 1.768 0.095-0.001 0.006 agec*r_ridreth1.1 0.013 0.049 0.260 0.798-0.090 0.115 agec*r_ridreth1.2 0.036 0.040 0.910 0.375-0.047 0.119 agec*r_ridreth1.3-0.006 0.054-0.103 0.919-0.119 0.108 agec*r_ridreth1.4 0.048 0.052 0.925 0.368-0.062 0.158 agecsq*r_ridreth1.1 0.001 0.003 0.396 0.697-0.005 0.008 agecsq*r_ridreth1.2-0.003 0.002-1.314 0.206-0.007 0.002 agecsq*r_ridreth1.3 0.003 0.002 1.398 0.180-0.001 0.006 agecsq*r_ridreth1.4 0.001 0.004 0.294 0.772-0.006 0.008 TEST F VALUE NUM. DF DENOM. DF PROB>F OVERALL FIT 80.730 17 1 0.087 agecsq 279.310 1 17 0.000 agec 35.752 1 17 0.000 r_gender[2] 29.230 1 17 0.000 r_ridreth1[5] 4.401 4 14 0.016 agec*r_gender[2] 1.694 1 17 0.210 agecsq*r_gender[2] 3.127 1 17 0.095 agec*r_ridreth1[5] 2.606 4 14 0.081 agecsq*r_ridreth1[5] 5.370 4 14 0.008 14