Central West Ontario Social and Economic Inclusion Project. Brant County Profile. Prepared by:

Similar documents
Visit our Publications and Open Data Catalogue to find our complete inventory of our freely available information products.

Visit our Publications and Open Data Catalogue to find our complete inventory of our freely available information products.

City Windsor 1991 Canada Census WARD 3

City Windsor 1991 Canada Census WARD 1

A Collection of Statistical Data for Huron County and its Census Subdivisions

Visit our Publications and Open Data Catalogue to find our complete inventory of our freely available information products.

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF THE CREDIT RIVER WATERSHED

Profile of the Francophone Community in. Algoma, Cochrane, Manitoulin, Sudbury 2010

Visit our Publications and Open Data Catalogue to find our complete inventory of our freely available information products.

Rathwood. Community Profile. expansion and parks development completed most of the community.

Erindale. Community Profile

Profile of the Francophone Community in CHAMPLAIN 2010

TABLE 1. PROFILE OF GENERAL DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

The Social Planning Council of Peel. A Comparative Perspective of Social Indicators in Peel Neighbourhoods, 2001

Visit our Publications and Open Data Catalogue to find our complete inventory of our freely available information products.

City of Edmonton Population Change by Age,

ACS DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING ESTIMATES American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

City of Windsor 1986 Canada Census. Walker Farm Planning District and Policy Area

ACS DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING ESTIMATES American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

HEMSON GROWTH FORECAST

CRMP DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 2018

A Profile of Workplaces in Waterloo Region

Demographic Trends: The 2mes they are a changin Highlights from the 2011 Census and Na2onal Household Survey

Central Erin Mills. Community Profile

Toronto s City #3: A Profile of Four Groups of Neighbourhoods

Precarious Employment. Brantford CMA 2017

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

POVERTY PROFILE: SPECIAL EDITION

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

APPENDIX 6: CENSUS DATA BURLINGTON, VERMONT

Tell us what you think. Provide feedback to help make American Community Survey data more useful for you.

Region of Waterloo Planning, Development and Legislative Services Community Planning

Poverty in the United Way Service Area

CITY OF STRATFORD OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW BACKGROUND REPORT DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC PROFILE AND POPULATION AND HOUSING GROWTH FORECAST NOVEMBER 21, 2012

Catalogue no XIE. Income in Canada

2016 Census of Canada

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

A STATISTICAL PROFILE OF WOMEN IN THE SASKATCHEWAN LABOUR MARKET

Pan-European opinion poll on occupational safety and health

Labour Market Information Monthly

Socio-economic Series Long-term household projections 2011 update

Fact Sheet: A Portrait of Alberta Seniors. July 2004

Average persons in household. Top three industries Post-secondary education (25 64 years) 7.1% Unemployment rate

A Profile of the Working Poor, 2011

The Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and the Territories

The Province of Prince Edward Island Employment Trends and Data Poverty Reduction Action Plan Backgrounder

New Bru nswick Regiona l Prof i les H IGHLIGHTS AN D U PDATES. Northeast Economic Region

Tracking the TRENDS 2018

Socio-economic Profile for Northeastern Region Community Futures Development Corporation. Prepared for: FedNor/Industry Canada

In 2012, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, about. A Profile of the Working Poor, Highlights CONTENTS U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS

Lake County. Government Finance Study. Supplemental Material by Geography. Prepared by the Indiana Business Research Center

POPULATION TOPIC PAPER

INDICATORS OF POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION IN RURAL ENGLAND: 2009

Ward 3 Barrhaven. City of Ottawa Ward Profiles 2011 Census and National Household Survey POPULATION* 46, ,390. Total City of Ottawa Population

Post-Secondary Education, Training and Labour Prepared November New Brunswick Minimum Wage Report

Overview of Social & Economic Trends

AUGUST THE DUNNING REPORT: DIMENSIONS OF CORE HOUSING NEED IN CANADA Second Edition

BRUCE GREY CHILD & FA MILY SERVICES (BGCFS) POVERTY REPORT

The Three Cities in Toronto 1970 to 2005

Post-Secondary Education, Training and Labour Prepared May New Brunswick Minimum Wage Report

First-time Homebuyers in Rural and Urban Pennsylvania

Market Study Report for the Municipality of Sioux Lookout. Prepared by:

Lake County. Government Finance Study. Supplemental Material by Geography. Prepared by the Indiana Business Research Center

Glanworth Neighbourhood Profile

Income, pensions, spending and wealth

EU Survey on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC)

MEMORANDUM. Gloria Macdonald, Jennifer Benedict Nevada Division of Health Care Financing and Policy (DHCFP)

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

Findings from the 2004 Canada Survey of Giving, Volunteering, and Participating

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

ACTUARIAL REPORT 27 th. on the

Economic Base Analysis

CONSTITUENCY PROFILE: DUBLIN SOUTH-WEST

Employment, Industry and Occupations of Inuit in Canada,

Clay County Comprehensive Plan

Socio-economic Profile for Pan-Northern Region Community Futures Development Corporation. Prepared for: FedNor/Industry Canada

Perspectives on the Youth Labour Market in Canada

Woodlands County Economic Indicators 2015

The Saskatchewan Labour Market

context about this report what is poverty?

2. Demographics. Population and Households

STATUS OF WOMEN OFFICE. Socio-Demographic Profiles of Saskatchewan Women. Aboriginal Women

Cumberland Comprehensive Plan - Demographics Element Town Council adopted August 2003, State adopted June 2004 II. DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS

2 PROFILE OF YORK REGION S LOW INCOME POPULATION: 2006 CENSUS

J. D. Kennedy, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. C. A. Tyrrell, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Associate

ACTUARIAL REPORT 25 th. on the

OFFICAL PLAN REVIEW ISSUES PAPER 2. GROWTH 2031 People Make the Difference

Brockley Neighbourhood Profile

2016 Census: Release 4. Income. Dr. Doug Norris Senior Vice President and Chief Demographer. September 20, Environics Analytics

tracking the TRENDS Social Health in Edmonton

newstats 2016 NWT Annual Labour Force Activity NWT Bureau of Statistics Overview

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

Agenda Item # Page # CHAIR AND MEMBERS COMMUNITY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING ON NOVEMBER 24,2008

The federal goods and services tax (GST) was

Low Income in Canada: Using the Market Basket Measure

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Tell us what you think. Provide feedback to help make American Community Survey data more useful for you.

Overview of Ontario Agriculture, Population and Labour Statistics

TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11 (5 TH EDITION) THE POPULATION OF SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN PRELIMINARY DRAFT SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION

Transcription:

Central West Ontario Social and Economic Inclusion Project Brant County Profile Prepared by: December, 2003

1.0 Introduction to Brant County Brant County is located between Hamilton to the east and London to the west. Surrounding areas include Oxford County in the west, Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Municipality in the east and the Region of Waterloo to the north, with Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality forming the county s southern boundary (Fig. 1.1). Brant County covers an area of 1093 km 2. In 2001, the population density was 108 persons per square kilometre. The two largest communities in Brant County are Brantford and Paris which together account for 82% of the total population of the county. There are a number of townships across the county of which the largest are Brantford, Burford and South Dumfries. The Six Nations of the Grand River and New Credit Federal Territories constitute a major land area and community within this county. In 2000, the townships of Brantford, Burford, South Dumfries, Onondaga and Oakland, as well as the Town of Paris were amalgamated into a single municipality, known as the County of Brant. Population Geographic Distribution Statistics Canada reported that the population of Brant County was 118,485 in 2001. Overall, population growth in Brant County has not kept pace with growth experienced in the rest of Ontario. Between 1996 and 2001, the population increased by 3.4% (Table 1.1). This compares to 6.1% growth for the rest of Ontario. And, growth rates were much higher for certain areas of the county. For example, the population of the former South Dumfries Township has grown by 18% between since 1991. Much of this growth was due to population increase in the town of St. George where a number of new subdivisions have been developed over the last several years. Two municipalities experienced a decline in population between 1991 and 1996, notably Brantford Township (-0.3%) and Oakland Township (-2%). Population density (number of people per square kilometre) can be an indicator of the extent to which an area is rural. Generally speaking, more urban areas will have higher population densities. In 2001, the County of Brant had a population density of 108 people per km 2. In contrast, the City of Brantford had a population density of 1,208 people per km 2. Central West Ontario Social and Economic Inclusion Project Brant County Profile 2

Table 1.1: Brant County by Municipality, 1991 and 1996 Census Data. Population change Municipality 1991 1996 Percent of Land area County km 2 Population Population 1991-1996 Brantford C 81997 84770 3.4% 74% 71.22 1190.3 Paris 8600 8990 4.5% 7.8% 13.64 659.1 Brantford TP 6509 6480-0.3% 5.7% 239.61 27.0 Burford TP 5733 5840 2.2% 5.1% 276.39 21.1 South Dumfries TP 4624 5430 17.7% 4.7% 181.93 29.8 Onondaga TP 1519 1675 8.6% 1.5% 87.11 19.2 Oakland TP 1398 1385-1.5% 1.2% 45.43 30.5 Amalgamated County of Brant Brant County Brantford City 28,383 29,800 5.0% - 1020.01 29.2 110806 114570 3.4% - 1091.23 105.0 ONTARIO 10084885 10753550 6.6% - 916733.7 11.7 Population Density People/ km 2 Population - Age Distribution In 1996, in Brant County, children under the age of 10 and youth aged 10-19 accounted for the same proportion of the total population (14% and 14% respectively). Adults aged 20-44 represented 37% while adults aged 45-64 constituted 21% of the population. And, those over the age of 64 made up 14% of the population (Fig.1.2). Central West Ontario Social and Economic Inclusion Project Brant County Profile 3

Age/Sex Composition As a proportion of the total population, there were fewer individuals in the 20 to 64 year old age group in Brant County than the rest of Ontario in 2001. There were also a higher proportion of those under the age of 20 and those over the age of 64 in Brant County as compared to Ontario (Figure 1.2). The notable difference between the province and Brant County in the 20-44 year old category may be attributable to people in this age group leaving the area for educational and employment opportunities. Table 1.2: Population of Brant County and Ontario, by Age and Sex, 1996 (Source: Census 1996, Statistics Canada). BRANT COUNTY ONTARIO AGE GROUP MALES FEMALES MALES FEMALES 0-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85+ 8305 7.3% 8440 7.4% 6965 6.1% 9125 8.0% 8465 7.4% 5580 4.9% 4330 3.7% 1935 1.7% 1250 1.1% 800 0.7% 485 0.4% 8055 7.0% 7975 7.0% 7000 6.1% 9575 8.4% 8715 7.6% 5550 4.9% 5005 4.4% 2475 2.2% 1910 1.7% 1435 1.3% 1195 1.0% 760620 7.1% 733520 6.8% 730445 6.8% 924805 8.6% 791910 7.9% 534685 4.9% 420155 3.9% 161675 1.5% 103030 1.0% 61280 0.6% 35760 0.3% 721615 7.7% 696465 6.5% 746050 7.0% 956705 9.9% 825070 7.7% 547095 5.1% 454350 4.2% 207750 1.9% 147980 1.4% 103435 1.0% 89145 Total 55680 58890 5257890 5495660 0.8% TOTAL 114,570 10,753,550 Central West Ontario Social and Economic Inclusion Project Brant County Profile 4

Projected Population Growth Between 1996 and 2016 the population of Brant County is projected to grow by 13% 1. While this overall growth will have an impact on the size of the communities, the substantial growth of the population aged 55 and over has the potential to have a major impact on the health care sector. Brant County will not be alone in this demographic shift as it has been well documented that all of Canada will experience similar changes as the post World War II baby boom generation ages. The population projections for Brant County for year 2016 indicate that there will be a 23% decline in the 0-19 year age group and a one percent decrease in the 20-44 age grouping. However, it is projected that the number of individuals aged 45-64 will increase by 44% and those aged 65+ will increase by 30%. Ethnic origin The population of Brant County is less ethnically diverse than the province as a whole. Canadian or English ethnicity was reported by approximately 30% of the Brant County population, compared to 20% in Ontario (Fig. 1.8 2 ). The proportion of population in Brant County reporting single ethnic origin in 1996 was 55% as compared to 61% of Ontario. In Brant County, other ethnic origins included: North American Indian, Portuguese, East Indian, Vietnamese, Chinese, Jamaican, Belgian, Greek, Filipino, Laotian, Korean, Romanian, Pakistani, Maltese, Austrian, Slovak, Estonian, Danish, Spanish, Trinidadian/Tobagonian, Japanese, Lithuanian, Punjabi and Armenian. 1 Provincial Health Planning Database, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, 1999 2 Statistics Canada, 1996 Central West Ontario Social and Economic Inclusion Project Brant County Profile 5

Immigration Status In 1996, the immigrant population represented 14% of Brant County s total population as compared to 26% of the province. Over half of these individuals emigrated from Europe: 29% from the United Kingdom; 11% from Poland; 8% from Italy; 8% from the Netherlands and 5% from Germany (Fig. 1.8). Approximately 60% of the immigrant population in Brant County and in the province (58% in Brant County, 62% in Ontario) reported that they immigrated at the age of 20 or older. An additional 30% reported that they immigrated between the ages of 5 and 19, while the remainder (13% in Brant County, 10% in Ontario) immigrated prior to age 5. Of the 15,925 immigrants living in Brant County in 1996, approximately 40% reported immigrating before 1961 with a similar proportion immigrating between 1961 and 1980. Fourteen percent immigrated between 1981 and 1990, while less than 9% (1405) immigrated between 1991 and 1996. Of the more recent immigrants, 24% had emigrated from Poland, 12% from the United Kingdom, 11% from Vietnam and 9% from India, with the bulk of these individuals settling in Brantford. A significantly larger proportion of Brant County residents (86%) were non-immigrant as compared to Ontario as a whole (74%). Of the non-immigrant population in Brant County, approximately 92% were born in Ontario compared to 87% of Ontario residents. Three percent of Brant County residents have a citizenship other than Canadian, compared to 8% of the Ontario residents. Central West Ontario Social and Economic Inclusion Project Brant County Profile 6

2.0 Economic characteristics Family composition Based on available Census data, married couples have continued to constitute the most common form of family structure in Brant County. A slightly smaller proportion of married couples in Brant County (60%) had children at home when compared to Ontario as a whole (62%) in 1996. Amongst common-law couples, the percentage with children at home was somewhat lower (Brant County 49% and Ontario 43%) than for married couples. In 1996, lone parent families comprised 15% of Brant County families and 14% of Ontario families. Thirteen percent of all families in Brant County were lone parent families headed by females (12% in Ontario). The proportion of lone-parent families headed by females in Brant County (85%) was similar to that for Ontario (84%). Education Levels Central West Ontario Social and Economic Inclusion Project Brant County Profile 7

The 1996 census indicates that, on average, the residents of Brant County had lower education levels than the provincial average. Nearly 40% of Brant County residents had not completed a Grade 13 diploma, compared to 33% in the province as a whole. Approximately 11% of Brant County residents had completed a university degree, compared to over 19% of the residents of Ontario (Fig. 1.13). Employment and Unemployment In 1996 the labour force participation rate was similar in Brant County and Ontario as a whole (66%), while the unemployment rate was slightly higher in Ontario (9%) than in Brant County (8%). When 15-24 year olds were excluded from these calculations, the unemployment rate dropped to 8% in Ontario and to 6% in Brant County. Among the 15-24 year olds, the unemployment rate was approximately 18% in Brant County and Ontario. Central West Ontario Social and Economic Inclusion Project Brant County Profile 8

In comparing employment status between Brant County and Ontario, greatest differences were observed between males aged 15-24 (Table 2.1). In Brant County, an additional 4% of males aged 15-24 participated in the labour force. The employment rate was also slightly higher (3%) among Brant County males in this age group than their Ontario counterparts. In comparing males and females, the overall unemployment rate for those aged 15 and older, was higher for females in Brant County as in Ontario. Of those aged 15+ in Brant County, 27% of males and 41% of females did not participate in the labour force. A similar difference was observed for Ontario (Table 1.3). In Brant County, four percent more males in the 15-24 age group were employed in 1996 than females in the same age group. The unemployment rate for males in this age group was 4% lower than their female counterparts. The differences between males and females were even greater when looking at those aged 25 and older. Nearly 16% more males, than females, over the age of 24 participated in the labour force in Brant County. In 1996, in Brant County, twice as many females versus males were classified as unpaid family workers. Almost half of males and more than a third of females reported traveling to a different census subdivision to work. More than twice as many males versus females reported no usual place of work. Similar patterns were observed for Ontario. When comparing Brant County to Ontario, eight percent more Ontario males and 14% more Ontario females reported their usual place of work in a different census subdivision as compared to Brant residents. Slightly more Ontario males (8%) reported working at home as compared to their Brant counterparts (7%). Central West Ontario Social and Economic Inclusion Project Brant County Profile 9

Table 2.1: Employment Status of Brant County Residents, aged 15 and older, in the Labour Force (Statistics Canada, 1996) EMPLOYMENT Population Aged 15+ by labour force activity As % of total male/female population As % of total population BRANT COUNTY ONTARIO Males Females Males Females 42,305 45,505 75.9% 77.3% 36.9% 39.7% 4,080,940 4,348,275 77.6% 79.1% 37.9% 40.4% In labour force Employed 30840 72.9% 26780 58.9% 73.0% 60.0% Unemployed 28610 92.8% 24240 90.5% 91.3% 90.4% Unemployment Rate 2230 7.2% 2540 9.5% 8.7% 9.6% Not in labour force 11465 27.1% 18725 41.1% 27.0% 40.0% Population Aged 15-24 by labour force activity As % of total male/female population As % of total population 7,395 13.3% 6.5% 7,325 12.4% 6.4% 710,190 13.5% 6.6% 689,330 12.5% 6.4% In labour force Employed Unemployed Unemployment Rate 5035 68.1% 4245 84.3% 790 15.7% 4515 61.6% 3620 80.2% 895 19.8% 63.9% 81.9% 18.2% 62.6% 82.5% 17.5% Not in labour force 2360 31.9% 2810 38.4% 36.1% 37.5% Population Aged 25+ by labour force activity As % of total male population As % of total population 34,915 62.7% 30.5% 38,175 64.8% 33.3% 3,370,745 64.1% 31.3% 3,658,940 66.6% 34.0% In labour force Employed 25805 73.9% 22265 58.3% 74.9% 59.5% Unemployed 24365 94.4% 20625 92.6% 93.0% 91.9% Unemployment Rate 1440 5.6% 1640 7.4% 7.0% 8.1% Not in labour force 9110 26.1% 15910 41.7% 25.1% 40.5% Central West Ontario Social and Economic Inclusion Project Brant County Profile 10

Household Income In 1996, the average private household income in Brant County was just over $48,000 approximately $6,000 less than the Ontario average (Table 2.2). Almost 22% of the households in this county had an annual household income below $20,000 with 5% having an income below $10,000. In Ontario, on average, 6% more households had an annual income of $80,000 and over as compared to Brant County. In 1996, the incidence of lowincome households in Brant County was reported as 13% compared to 15% in Ontario. Table 2.2: Household Income - All Private Households (Statistics Canada, 1996). Income Level Brant County % Ontario % $10,000 5.3 6.4 10,000-19,999 16.5 14.1 20,000-29,999 14.0 12.1 30,000-39,999 12.4 11.6 40,000-49,999 11.7 10.9 50,000-59,999 10.4 9.8 60,000-69,999 8.8 8.5 70,000 79,999 6.9 6.8 80,000 89,999 4.7 5.2 90,000 99,999 2.6 3.8 100,000 and over 6.6 10.8 Average Income 48,086 54,291 Median Income 41,367 45,155 The average annual income for males aged 15 and older, in 1996, was approximately $31,000 compared to approximately $19,000 for females aged 15 and older (Table 2.3). A similar difference was observed in Ontario, with males having on average an annual income one and a half times higher than females. A greater proportion of Ontario males earned $50,000 and over (21%) compared to Brant County males (16%). In Brant County, in 1996, 38% of males earned an annual income of less than $20,000 as compared to 64% of females. While a similar proportion of Brant County males (38%) were in the less than $20,000 income bracket as their Ontario counterparts, a difference was observed for the females. Sixty-four percent of Brant County females were in this income bracket as compared to 58% of their Ontario counterparts. Proportionately twice as many Brant County males as females were in the $30,000-$49,999 income bracket (29% and 14%, respectively) with a similar pattern apparent in Ontario. Only 5% of Brant County females earned an annual income of $50,000 or more compared to 16% of their male counterparts (Table 1.7). Proportionately, almost 5% more Ontario males and 3% more Ontario females were in the $50,000 and over income bracket than their Brant County counterparts. Central West Ontario Social and Economic Inclusion Project Brant County Profile 11

Table 2.3 Income of Individuals Aged 15 and older (Statistics Canada, 1996). Income Level Brant County % Ontario % MALES FEMALES MALES FEMALES Under 1,000 4.3 5.0 5.0 5.8 1,000-2,999 3.7 6.6 3.9 5.8 3,000-4,999 2.9 4.8 3.2 5.2 5,000-6,999 3.0 6.2 3.6 5.8 7,000-9,999 4.9 8.4 5.2 8.4 10,000-14,999 9.7 19.6 9.3 16.0 15,000-19,999 9.1 13.6 8.0 11.2 20,000-24,999 8.8 9.6 7.8 9.0 25,000-29,999 8.5 7.9 7.5 8.0 30,000-39,999 16.6 9.5 14.5 11.8 40,000-49,999 12.7 4.3 11.2 6.0 50,000 and over 16.0 4.6 20.8 7.1 Average Income 30,605 18,708 33,599 21,048 Median 26,964 14,787 27,379 16,004 Table 2.4 indicates that the incidence of low income among unattached individuals and families is slightly lower in Brant County than in Ontario. However, the average family income in Brant County is consistently lower than the average family income in Ontario. This holds true for unattached individuals, two-parent, lone-parent and other types of families. Table 2.4: Comparison of Income Data for Brant County and Ontario, 1996. Incidence of Low Income Unattached Individuals Brant County Ontario 36.4% 37.9% Average Census Family Income $53,893 $59,830 Average Husband-Wife Family Income Average Lone-male Parent Family Income Average Lone-female Parent Family Income Incidence of Low Income Families $58,357 $64,434 $35,506 $44,318 $28,165 $30,182 12.5% 14.8% Central West Ontario Social and Economic Inclusion Project Brant County Profile 12