Economic Benefits of the Proposed Casa Diablo Geothermal Power Plant, Wahlstrom & Associates 2012

Similar documents
Economic Impacts of the First 5 Placer Children & Families Commission s Funded Programs

DOMINGUEZ OIL FIELD REDEVELOPMENT: EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation

Reference Point May 2015

Economic Impact Analysis of Fort Steele National Heritage Town. Final Report. By:

ARROYO VERDUGO OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS

ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACT OF A WAL-MART DISTRIBUTION CENTER IN OPELOUSAS, LOUISIANA AUGUST 2008

COLORADO FILM INCENTIVES

The Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on the Owsley County Economy

2016 Economic Impact of Tourism in Morgan County. Methodology, Metrics and Evaluation

The Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on the Woodford County Economy

A. INTRODUCTION B. METHODOLOGY

2016 Economic Impact of Tourism in Tippecanoe County. Methodology, Metrics and Evaluation

Tourism s Economics Impact on Somerset County. May 2018

Tourism s Economics Impact on the Meadowlands Liberty Region. May 2018

Macroeconomic Impact of S ESOPs on the U.S. Economy

SKECHERS HERMOSA BEACH DESIGN CENTER & EXECUTIVE OFFICES

2015 A Record Year for Indiana Tourism. Methodology, Metrics and Evaluation

Another Record Setting Year for Indiana Tourism. The 2017 Contribution of Travel & Tourism to the Indiana Economy

SPOTSYLVANIA SOLAR ENERGY CENTER

The Economic. Impact of Veteran-Owned. Franchise. August 30, 2011

The Economic Base of San Juan County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

NATIONAL ECONOMIC ACCOUNTS 2011 (Provisional Estimates)

AGM Survey Results NIRI NIRI 2010 Annual Conference Onsite Survey: Annual General Meetings

Economic Impact of THE PLAYERS Championship Golf Tournament at Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida, May Tom Stevens, Alan Hodges and David Mulkey

Economic Impact of THE PLAYERS Championship Golf Tournament at Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida, March Tom Stevens, Alan Hodges and David Mulkey

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT FOR THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2012

Kansas Department of Revenue Office of Policy and Research State Sales Tax Collections by NAICS

Impact of Riverboat Gambling on the Business Climate in Lake County, Indiana

The Value of the Local Healthcare System on the Lyon County Economy

The Value of the Local Healthcare System on the Harrison County Economy

Ohio Ethanol Producers Association

Development of Offshore Oil and Natural Gas Resources could make to the Virginia Beach MSA

The Economic Base of Eddy County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

The Economic Base of Rio Arriba County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University

The Economic Base of Rio Arriba County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University

Economic Impact of the Commercial Construction Industry on the Economy of the State of Alabama

The Economic Base of San Miguel County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University

The Economic Base of Rio Arriba County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University

The Value of the Local Healthcare System on the Jefferson County Economy

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT FOR THE SECOND QUARTER OF 2012

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING AND REGULATION Office of Workforce Information and Performance 1100 North Eutaw Street Baltimore, MD 21201

FINANCIAL RATIOS OF CANADIAN COMPANIES July 26, 2012 Alberto Calva // Acus Consulting Ltd

The Local Economic Impact of Short Term Rentals in Monterey County

The Economic Base of Valencia County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

North Dakota Printing Industry Economic & Fiscal Contribution

Nevada Commerce Tax Narrative. Prepared by Commerce Tax Division

MILLS BRANCH SOLAR: Economic Benefits

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT, THIRD QUARTER OF 2018 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

The Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program. Compiled by the Office of the Illinois State Treasurer Treasurer Michael W. Frerichs

EMPLOYEES UNDER LABOUR CONTRACT AND GROSS AVERAGE WAGES AND SALARIES, THIRD QUARTER OF 2017

Minnesota Printing Industry Economic & Fiscal Contribution

The Economic Base of Quay County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

Q Internal Financial Report (Unaudited)

GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY ANDREW YOUNG SCHOOL OF POLICY STUDIES FISCAL RESEARCH CENTER ATLANTA, GA FEBRUARY 2, 2005

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT, SECOND QUARTER OF 2017 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

Figure 1. Gross average wages and salaries by months

EMPLOYEES UNDER LABOUR CONTRACT AND GROSS AVERAGE WAGES AND SALARIES, FOURTH QUARTER OF 2016

The Economic Impacts of Restoration

Michigan Economic Development Corporation

Yukon Bureau of Statistics

Yukon Bureau of Statistics

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF OKLAHOMA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE VISITORS ON THE ECONOMY OF TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT, FIRST QUARTER OF 2017 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation

CHAPTER 6. The Economic Contribution of Hospitals

An Economic Impact Analysis of a Proposed Downtown Centre for the City of Moncton

Economic Impact of Tennessee HOUSE Grants

Michigan Economic Development Corporation

Nevada Imposes a New Commerce Tax on Businesses

Nonemployer Statistics An Indicator of Virginia s Gig Economy

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York Calendar Year Long Island Focus

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT, FIRST QUARTER OF 2018 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

SANTA ANA COLLEGE THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF. July 2018 ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC IMPACT AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT OF EDUCATION

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2014 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

GOAL 0: GDP GROWTH. By 2028, New Brunswick will experience an upward trend that returns its GDP growth rate to 2008 levels. Status: NOT PROGRESSING

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT, SECOND QUARTER OF 2014 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

Michigan Economic Development Corporation

Economic Significance of Meetings to the US Economy. Events Industry Council

The Economic Base of Sandoval County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

SANTIAGO CANYON COLLEGE

Insolvency Statistics in Canada. September 2015

September The Economic Impact of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in West Virginia, Virginia, and North Carolina. Prepared for. Dominion Resources

Yukon Bureau of Statistics

The Economic Base of Sandoval County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

4.3 Economic and Fiscal Impacts

The Economic Base of Curry County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation

Estimating the Value of the. In The Arrowhead Region and Minnesota. October 19, 2016 Research Report. For the. Natural Resources Research Institute

The Economic Base of Curry County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

The Economic Impact of Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Gaming Operations

The Local Economic Impact of Short Term Rentals in Galveston, Texas

Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Appendix G Economic Analysis Report

Big Chino Water Ranch Project Impact Analysis Prescott & Prescott Valley, Arizona

Alaska s Non-Petroleum Corporate Income Tax. Trends in Collections by Sector and Revised Corporate Income Tax Forecast Model

Economic Impacts of the Cherrywood Solar Farm on Caroline County and the State of Maryland

The Economic Base of the Albuquerque, NM, Metropolitan Statistical Area

Kansas Department of Revenue Office of Policy and Research State Sales Tax Collections by NAICS Calendar Year 2007 January-07.

AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REPORT CARD FOR YAKIMA COUNTY

Transcription:

Appendix G Comment Letters ATTACHMENT G2 Economic Benefits of the Proposed Casa Diablo Geothermal Power Plant, Wahlstrom & Associates 2012 This exhibit contains an economic benefit report provided by the Applicant that was independently reviewed by the BLM, USFS, and GBUAPCD and their NEPA and CEQA contractor and cited in Section 4.15, Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice, and Response I2-10 in Appendix H. Casa Diablo IV Geothermal Development Project June 2013 Final EIS/EIR

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary of Economic Benefits... i 1. Project Description... 1 2. Mono County s Economic Setting... 3 2.1 Mono County s Gross County Product... 3 2.2 Mono County s Construction Industry... 3 3. Economic and Employment Benefits of Constructing the CD-4 Power Plant... 5 4. Economic Impacts of Ongoing Operations... 8 Appendix: Economic Impact Analysis Tables FIGURES Figure 1: Casa Diablo (CD-4) Geothermal Power Plant Project Layout (Tentative) Figure 2: Economic Benefits Generated by Constructing the CD-4 Geothermal Power Plant Figure 3: Annual Economic and Employment Benefits of Operating the CD-4 Geothermal Power Plant APPENDIX TABLES Table A-1: Employment Trends in Mono County and California, 1992 2011 Table A-2: Mono County Gross County Product and Industry Outputs, 2010 Table A-3: Construction Industry Output in Mono County, 2009

SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC BENEFITS This report informs project advocates and Agency policymakers about the economic benefits of approving and implementing the proposed Casa Diablo (CD- 4) geothermal power plant located approximately two miles east of the Town of Mammoth Lakes. Approving the proposed project will add value to the regional economy, boost the construction industry, and create jobs. Economic Benefits of Construction The proposed project will require a private investment of $108.4, of which $5.8 million will be retained within the region. The multiplier impacts should expand the initial investment into a $13.3 million injection into the local economy. Constructing the CD-4 power plant will add 13.4 percent to Mono County s $99 million construction industry, and expand the $1.06 billion economy by 1.2 percent. New investment in the CD-4 plant should also create 182 construction jobs and 103 new jobs in the region during the 16-month construction period. Forty-six new jobs will be created for Mono and Inyo County construction firms and sole proprietors. The remaining 57 new jobs will be captured by out-of-area construction firms and independent contractors, that will stay in local lodging facilities, purchase food, retail products, and services during their work stay in the region. Essentially, constructing the proposed CD-4 project will add 13.8 percent to Mono County s construction industry jobs base, which will be a welcome infusion into an important sector of the economy that lost 250 construction jobs since 2007. Economic Benefits of Ongoing Operations The proposed power plant will require $2.8 million of annual costs that includes payroll for facility operations, ongoing maintenance and repair, and royalty payments. Approximately $1.01 million will be retained within the region, and recirculated through the local economy. The positive economic benefits will expand to $1.15 million per year after accounting for the multiplier impacts. Up to 8 new permanent jobs will be created after accounting for the multiplier impacts. The Project Sponsor will hire six new employees to operate and maintain the CD-4 plant at an average full burdened salary of $117,000 per employee. Ongoing operations of the facility will generate six new full-time jobs. The salaries earned by the additional staff will add disposable income to the local economy through consumer spending on housing, retail, and personal and professional services in Mono and Inyo County and the Town of Mammoth Lakes. Moreover, new employees hired to operate the plant will become citizens of the community and contribute to the tax base and civic life. The new CD-4 plant will anchor and strengthen the presence of geothermal energy production as a key component of the local economy. i

Royalty Payments The Project Sponsor will be required to make $700,000 of annual royalty payments to the Federal Government, which includes $175,000 of payments to the Mono County General Fund (25 percent). These ongoing costs will be paid each year after the plant is constructed, produces electricity, and generates revenue. * * * ii

1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project will require $108 million of private investment to construct and operate a new 33 megawatt (MW) Casa Diablo (CD-4) binary power plant within the Mammoth Pacific Complex, approximately two miles east of the Town of Mammoth Lakes. The geothermal power plant complex includes three existing geothermal plants and accompanying production and injection well fields. Two of these plants located on a 90-acre parcel of private land, and one is located on federal land. Figure 1 shows the location of the existing plants. The CD-4 power plant and well fields will be located on public lands managed by the United States Forest Service. Up to 14 new wells will be drilled over the life of the project; half of the wells will be production wells and the other half will be injection wells. The depth of the production wells will range from 1,600 to 2,000 feet, and the depth of the new injection wells will be approximately 2,500 feet. New pipelines will be constructed to connect the production wells to the power plant and the plant to the individual injection wells. The main pipeline will parallel MPLP s existing Basalt Canyon pipeline that will cross US 395 at the same place as the existing pipeline. An electric transmission line will connect a new substation capable of supplying electricity for approximately 33,000 utility customers. This report estimates the benefits to region s economy generated by constructing the proposed CD-4 power plant, wells, pipelines, and other improvements necessary to transmit electricity to the power grid. The construction of the power plant and support infrastructure are expected to inject millions of dollars into the local economy and create new jobs during the 16-month construction period. Project Schedule It is anticipated that the proposed project s implementation and construction will generate approximately 16 months of work for drilling, construction, engineering, and professional services contractors. The applicant intends to begin construction in 2013, with the precise start date depending on weather and the expediency with which they are able to receive construction permits for the new power plant. * * * 1

Figure 1 Casa Diablo (CD-4) Geothermal Power Plant Project Layout (Tentative) 12-25 34-25 14-25 25-25 15-25 56-25 66-25 38-25 57-25 26-30 395 50-25 77-25 81-36 12-31 12A-31 Existing Substation 23-31 MPI Existing Powerplants MPII PLESI 55-32 0 0.25 35-31 Miles 65-32 55-31 Proposed Well Pipelines Proposed Recycled Water Pipeline Proposed Plant Site Proposed Well Site Existing Pipeline Existing Well Site 203 Source: Ormat, 2010. 2

2. MONO COUNTY S ECONOMIC SETTING The proposed project will boost Mono County s economy, which has been experiencing a decline in employment since the September 2008 financial crises (see Table A-1). The number of Mono County s private sector jobs expanded from 4,100 in 1992 to 5,600 by 2006, expanding at a 2.2 percent annual rate of growth over a 14 year period, exceeding the State of California s 1.6 percent job growth rate during the same period. However, Mono County lost 351 private sector jobs between 2007 and 2011, which amounted to a 2.1 percent annual rate of job loss during this period. Job losses in Mono County were less severe than California s 2.6 percent annual rate of job losses because Mono County s economy is less dependent on the manufacturing, retail, and technology sectors that suffered severe job losses during the recession. Lodging facilities and restaurants account for 59 percent of Mono County s private jobs, illustrating the region s dependence on tourism. Retail businesses comprise about 12 percent of county jobs, with construction and real estate/leasing accounting for 6 percent of the job base. 2.1 MONO COUNTY S GROSS COUNTY PRODUCT The value of goods and services produced in Mono County exceeds $1 billion (see Table A-2, Column 2). Mono County s three largest economic sectors include accommodations ($270 million), real estate ($224 million), and public administration ($163 million). Employee wages paid among all industries amount to $346 million (Column 4). Self employed individuals earned $72 million of proprietor income (Column 5), and corporate profits, rents, and interest earned on real estate assets equaled $228 million (Column 6). 2.2 MONO COUNTY S CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY The past trends and current conditions within Mono County s construction industry provides a benchmark to evaluate the proposed project s economic impacts, as summarized below. The recession drastically reduced the demand to build new homes and commercial space, resulting in the loss of 250 construction jobs in Mono County between 2007 and 2011 (see Table A-1). Specifically, Mono County lost 42 percent of its 2006 construction job base, decreasing from 580 jobs to 333 jobs by 2011. 3

The construction industry generated $95 million of production value, which accounts for 9 percent of Mono County s gross product (see Table A-3, Column 2). Self employed persons generate approximately 50 percent of Mono County s construction industry earnings. Wage and salary employees generate the other half of industry earnings. The construction of nonresidential structures, which includes the proposed CD-4 power plant, generates $32 million of industry output. Construction companies that build other nonresidential structures pay $6.8 million in salaries, and sole proprietors earn $7.2 million in fees. * * * 4

3. ECONOMIC AND EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OF CONSTRUCTING THE CD-4 POWER PLANT Constructing the proposed project will require $108.4 million of new investment, of which $5.8 million will be retained within the Mono/Inyo County region. The total economic impacts of the construction activities should multiply to $13.3 million after accounting for business-to-business sales and the additional consumer spending generated by construction workers. If approved, constructing the CD-4 power plant will add 13.4 percent to Mono County s $99 million construction industry and it will expand the $1.06 billion economy by 1.2 percent. 1 The economic and employment impacts of constructing the facility are described below and quantified in Figure 2 through the 16-month construction period. Value of Construction Materials and Equipment Approximately 47 percent of the project costs ($50.5 million) will be invested in the equipment and materials needed to drill new geothermal wells, build the pipeline system, and construct a new power plant, substation and electrical transmission system components. Materials and equipment required to build the proposed project will be imported from offshore or other locations outside Mono and Inyo County; the materials will include pipes, wire, transmission structures, structural steel, conduit, concrete, transformers, high-voltage circuit breakers, metal-clad switchgear, computer systems, heat exchangers, turbines, generators, motors, pumps, valves, pressure and flow monitoring equipment, communication equipment, vehicles, and office equipment. Labor Costs and Contracts The proposed project will require the Project Sponsor to spend $25.7 million to hire a general contractor and subcontractors to drill wells, build the power plant, and make other improvements necessary to transmit electricity into the grid. Mono and Inyo County construction firms and individuals are likely to receive $5.6 million of the construction, civil engineering, and site preparation related contracts, which amounts to 22 percent of the project direct labor expenditures. Most likely, the CD-4 power plant facility will be Mono County s largest construction project that generates 14.1 percent of total construction worker earnings. 2 1 See Appendix Table A-3. 2 See Table A-3. Mono County s construction workforce currently earns $19.3 million of wage and salary income. Self-employed construction contractors currently earn $20.3 million of proprietor income. 5

Geothermal Plant Investment Components Value of Investment (1) Figure 2 Economic Benefits Generated by Constructing the CD-4 Geothermal Power Plant Direct Purchases in Mono and Inyo County (2) Indirect Economic Multiplier Benefits (3) Induced Economic Multiplier Benefits (4) Total Economic Benefits (5) Direct Jobs Created by Construction Activities (6) Indirect and Induced Jobs Created in Mono and Inyo County (7) Equipment & Materials $50,488,000 (a) $0 $0 $0 $0 0 0 0 Labor Costs & Contracts $25,670,000 (b) $5,655,000 $762,000 $6,741,000 (d) $13,158,000 180 55 101 Other Costs $32,245,000 (c) $179,000 $25,000 $21,000 $225,000 2 0 2 TOTAL $108,403,000 $5,834,000 $787,000 $6,762,000 $13,383,000 182 55 103 Total Jobs Created in Mono and Inyo County (8) Data Sources: Ormat Technologies. Analysis: Wahlstrom & Associates. Notes: Column 1 - Cost estimates provided by the Project Sponsor. Data in individual rows are described below. Row (a) Costs of purchasing the generating units, other plant equipment, substation, transmission line improvements, electrical buildings, pipelines and spare parts. Assumes that materials purchases comprise 77 percent of total drilling costs consistent with expenditures for the Dixie Meadows project in Churchill County, Nevada. Row (b) Expenses for a general contractor and specialty subcontractors that include mechanical, electrical, gathering, transmission line, and substation. Assumes that labor costs comprise 23 percent of total drilling costs consistent with expenditures for the Dixie Meadows project. Row (c) Costs of leasing office space away from the site, transporting Ormat employees and equipment to and from the project site, insurance and a study to upgrade the grid needed to transmit electricity from the CD-4 power plant. Column 2 - Estimates of local purchases provided by the Project Sponsor. Column 3 - Calculations of indirect impacts adds business-to-business sales to the direct impacts. Column 4 - Calculations of induced impacts measures workforce and consumer spending that supplements the direct impacts. Row (d) Measures spending by out-of-town construction workers that stay in local lodging facilities and purchase consumer products and services while residing in Mono County. Column 5 - Summary of columns 2, 3 and 4. Column 6 - Calculations of direct jobs created per $1 million of investment. Column 7 - Calculations of Type 1 jobs measures indirect and induced. Column 8 - Includes direct, indirect and induced jobs created in Mono and Inyo County. 6

Expenditures on construction contractors should inject approximately $13.2 million into Mono and Inyo County s economy after accounting for the $5.6 million direct investment and the multiplier impacts. Business to business sales generated by local contractors working on the CD-4 project will expand the economy by $762,000. Highly skilled workers necessary to operate the heavy machinery used to drill the wells and construct the power plant should spend another $6.7 million at local hotels, restaurants, and retail establishments while on the job. Other Construction Costs The remaining $32.2 million of direct costs will be expended on the rental of office and residential space during the construction period, as well as insurance and the transportation of company officials, materials, and equipment to and from the project site. In addition, a study will be required to improve the grid s capacity to transmit the electricity produced by the CD-4 project as the proposed project may require additional unforeseen transmission lines and/or other electrical system improvements. Job Creation New investment in the CD-4 plant will create 182 construction jobs, including 46 jobs for Mono and Inyo County construction firms and sole proprietors. 3 The remaining new jobs will be captured by out-of-town construction firms and independent contractors, that will stay in local lodging facilities and purchase food, retail products, and services during their work stay in the Mono/Inyo County region. The proposed CD-4 project should expand Mono County s construction jobs by 13.8 percent, from 333 to 379, which will be a welcome infusion of work to an important sector of the economy that lost 250 construction jobs since 2007. 4 Business-to-business sales and the additional consumer spending generated by project construction workers will add another 55 jobs within the Mono and Inyo County region during the 16-month construction period. Constructing the proposed project will add 103 new jobs to the local economy, which includes the 46 direct construction jobs, and the 57 other jobs created to provide products and services to support the construction activities. * * * 3 Civil engineering firms in Mono and Inyo County should received $5.6 million of contracts, which will create 46 direct jobs based on IMPLAN data. 4 See Appendix Table A-1. 7

4. ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF ONGOING OPERATIONS The CD-4 plant will require $2.8 million per year of costs to maintain and manage ongoing operations. Workers and businesses in the Mono/Inyo County region should capture $1.15 million of annual expenditures, which will create 8 new permanent jobs. The economic impact of the Project Sponsor s annual expenditures are described below and quantified in Figure 3. Six new employees will be hired to operate and maintain the facility at an average full burdened salary of $117,000 per employee. 5 Salaries earned by the full time employees will generate $49,000 of additional economic multipliers within the region. The six new jobs created will expand to 7 jobs after accounting for the employment multipliers. Approximately $1.5 million will be spent each year for materials and equipment needed to maintain and repair the drilling wells, power plant and other related facilities. Approximately 85 percent of the materials and equipment will be shipped in from out of the region or off shore. Approximately $225,000 of the annual maintenance costs will be retained within Mono and Inyo County region. Annual materials and equipment expenditures will generate $262,000 of benefits to the local economy that includes the multiplier impacts. Royalty Payments The Project Sponsor will be required to make $700,000 of annual royalty payments, of which $175,000 will be allocated to Mono County. The funds captures locally can support one new job. The ongoing costs will be paid each year after the plant is constructed, produces electricity, and generates revenue. The royalty payments are not sufficient to generate new jobs. * * * 5 Information provided by the Project Sponsor. 8

Figure 3 Annual Economic and Employment Benefits of Operating the CD-4 Geothermal Power Plant Cost Categories Annual Cost Estimates (1) Direct Investments Retained within Mono County (2) Indirect Economic Multiplier Benefits (3) Induced Economic Multiplier Benefits (4) Total Economic Benefits (5) Full Time Jobs (6) Indirect and Induced Jobs Created in Mono County (7) Total Jobs Created in Mono County (8) LABOR AND CONTRACTOR COSTS Operating Employees and Contractors (NAICS 2221) $617,000 (a) $617,000 $0 $49,000 (f) $666,000 6 1 7 OTHER MAINTENANCE COSTS Power Plant and Well Field Materials and Equipment $1,500,000 (b) $225,000 (c) $19,000 (e) $18,000 (f) $262,000 0 0 0 Royalties $700,000 (b) $175,000 (d) $0 $51,000 (g) $226,000 0 1 1 TOTAL BENEFITS $2,817,000 $1,017,250 $19,000 $118,000 $1,154,000 6 2 8 Data Sources: Project Description, Correspondence with Project Sponsor and IMPLAN. Analysis: Wahlstrom & Associates. Notes: Column 1 - (a) Six employees will be hired at an average wage of $100,000 per year and they will receive a full benefits package estimated at $17,000 per year. Information provided by project applicant (b) Information provided by Project Sponsor. Column 2 - (c) Assumes Mono and Inyo County will retain 15 percent of expenditures. (d) Mono County will retain 25 percent of annual royalty payments Column 3 - (e) 0.085 indirect multipliers for electrical power generation based IMPLAN. Column 4 - (f) 0.078 induced multipliers for electrical power plant operations based IMPLAN. (g) 0.29 induced multipliers for local government payroll based IMPLAN. 9

APPENDIX: ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLES

Table A-1 Employment Trends in Mono County and California, 1992 2011 1992 2003 2006 2011 Percent Private Sector Jobs 2011 Job Growth 1992 2006 Job Growth 2007 2011 Annual Growth Rate 1992 2006 Annual Growth Rate 2007 2011 California Total Employment 12,505,100 14,768,000 15,435,500 14,445,700 2,930,400-989,800 1.5% -2.2% Total Private Employment 10,057,900 11,966,800 12,608,000 11,661,800 2,550,100-946,200 1.6% -2.6% Construction Employment 495,500 796,800 933,700 553,700 4% 438,200-380,000 4.6% -16.0% Mono County Total Employment 5,200 7,100 7,100 6,880 1,900-250 2.3% -1.2% Total Private Employment 4,100 5,500 5,600 5,280 1,500-351 2.2% -2.1% 11 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, and Hunting 30 20 30 29 1% 0-1 0.0% -0.8% 21 Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 28 15 1 1 0% -26 0-20.8% -2.2% 22 Utilities 8 4 2 2 0% -6 0-9.0% -2.2% 23 Construction 330 560 580 333 6% 251-250 4.1% -17.0% 31-33 Manufacturing 50 60 60 39 1% 10-21 1.3% -13.4% 42 Wholesale Trade 20 20 30 10 0% 10-20 2.9% -31.2% 44-45 Retail 570 740 730 624 12% 160-106 1.8% -5.1% 48-49 Transportation and Warehousing 8 4 49 76 1% 42 26 14.0% 15.3% 51 Information 48 44 24 25 0% -24 0-4.8% 0.6% 52 Finance and Insurance 62 57 54 43 1% -8-10 -1.0% -6.9% 53 Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 248 391 422 293 6% 174-129 3.9% -11.5% 54 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 102 191 225 117 2% 123-108 5.8% -19.6% 55 Management of Companies and Enterprises 56 Administrative Support, Waste Management, and Remediation 61 Educational Services 0 85 4 1 133 2 1 29 4 0 213 4 0% 4% 0% 1-55 0-1 183 0 0.0% -7.3% 0.5% N/A 93.3% -2.2% 62 Health Care and Social Assistance 209 151 13 14 0% -197 1-18.2% 3.0% 71 Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 62 96 95 99 2% 33 5 3.1% 1.7% 72 Accommodation and Food Services 2,103 2,826 3,042 3,132 59% 940 90 2.7% 1.0% 81 Other Services (except Public Administration) 159 207 237 227 4% 77-10 2.9% -1.5% 91 Public Administration 1,060 1,530 1,500 1,600 440 100 2.5% 2.2% Source: California Employment Development Department and IMPLAN ES 202 Files. Analysis: Wahlstrom & Associates.

Table A-2 Mono County Gross County Product and Industry Outputs, 2010 Description Employment (1) Industry Output (2) Industry Output % Total (3) Employee Compensation (4) Proprietor Income (5) Other Property Income (6) Indirect Business Tax (7) Indirect Business Tax % Total (8) TOTAL 9,600 $1,056,400,000 $345,900,000 $71,900,000 $227,700,000 $66,000,000 11 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, and Hunting 20 $7,400,000 1% $200,000 $900,000 $1,500,000 $100,000 0% 21 Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 30 $17,500,000 2% $3,600,000 $400,000 $4,500,000 $900,000 1% 22 Utilities 10 $6,900,000 1% $1,400,000 $0 $2,600,000 $800,000 1% 23 Construction 740 $95,100,000 9% $19,3000,000 $20,300,000 $6,500,000 $700,000 1% 31-33 Manufacturing 40 $16,100,000 2% $1,500,000 $60,000 $1,100,000 $1,400,000 2% 42 Wholesale Trade 10 $2,400,000 0% $800,000 $90,000 $300,000 $300,000 1% 44-45 Retail 930 $56,800,000 5% $21,300,000 $6,800,000 $9,600,000 $10,200,000 15% 48 Transportation 50 $9,800,000 1% $2,200,000 $100,000 $1,000,000 $200,000 0% 49 Warehousing and Storage 40 $3,000,000 0% $1,500,000 $700 $400,000 $10,000 0% 51 Information 40 $6,800,000 1% $1,300,000 $400,000 $1,000,000 $200,000 0% 52 Finance and Insurance 90 $16,400,000 2% $2,300,000 $1,600,000 $3,900,000 $300,000 0% 53 Real Estate, Rentals, and Leasing 990 $224,200,000 21% $10,900,000 $12,400,000 $114,300,000 $25,300,000 38% 54 Professional, Scientific and Technical 290 $29,300,000 3% $7,600,000 $6,800,000 $5,500,000 $700,000 1% 55 Management of Companies and Enterprises 40 $1,100,000 0% $700,000 $60,000 $100,000 $5,000 0% 56 Administrative, Waste Management, and Remediation 200 $18,600,000 2% $6,100,000 $500,000 $2,500,000 $500,000 1% 61 Education Services 20 $1,100,000 0% $700,000 $20,000 $70,000 $10,000 0% 62 Health Care 140 $11,100,000 1% $1,700,000 $4,400,000 $400,000 $80,000 0% 71 Arts, Entertainment and Recreation 570 $49,000,000 5% $13,500,000 $3,800,000 $9,300,000 $4,600,000 7% 72 Accommodations and Food Services 2,980 $269,600,000 26% $96,300,000 $2,900,000 $36,000,000 $19,300,000 29% 81 Other Services 510 $51,200,000 5% $15,7800,000 $10,500,000 $1,400,000 $400,000 1% 91 Public Administration 1,880 $163,000,000 15% $137,300,000 $0 $25,700,000 $0 0% Source: Minnesota IMPLAN Group. Analysis: Wahlstrom & Associates. Notes: Column 1 - Includes self-employment. Column 2 - Value of industry production in producer prices. Column 4 - Includes wages, salaries, benefits, and employer taxes. Column 5 - Self-employment earnings including capital consumption allowance. Column 6 - Includes corporate profits, rent, interest, and capital consumption allowance. Column 7 - Includes sales taxes, excise taxes, fees, fines, licenses, and property taxes. All payments to government except payroll taxes and end-o- year corporate taxes.

Table A-3 Construction Industry Output in Mono County, 2009 Industry Employee Proprietor Other Property Indirect Employment Output Compensation Income Income Business Tax (1) Description (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) TOTAL INDUSTRY OUTPUT 9,635 $1,056,400,714 $345,855,122 $71,912,529 $227,693,910 $66,022,960 23 Construction 741 $95,099,017 $19,302,800 $20,295,285 $6,478,693 $658,903 34 Construction of new commercial and health care structures 162 $18,928,040 $4,267,937 $4,480,140 $958,746 $183,648 35 Construction of new manufacturing structures 49 $5,391,018 $1,299,180 $1,369,227 $297,648 $26,392 36 Construction of other new nonresidential structures 261 $32,222,141 $6,848,916 $7,208,556 $1,749,051 $223,175 37-38 Construction of new residential structures 144 $24,814,949 $3,792,994 $3,997,495 $2,270,589 $114,622 39 Maintenance and repair of nonresidential structures 86 $9,030,383 $2,266,596 $1,882,067 $757,438 $80,614 40 Maintenance and repair of residential structures 37 $4,712,486 $827,177 $1,357,801 $445,220 $30,453 Source: Minnesota IMPLAN Group. Analysis: Wahlstrom & Associates. Notes: Column 1 - Includes self-employment. Column 2 - Value of industry production in producer prices. Column 3 - Includes wages, salaries, benefits, and employer taxes. Column 4 - Self-employment earnings including capital consumption allowance. Column 5 - Includes corporate profits, rent, interest and capital consumption allowance. Column 6 - Includes sales taxes, excise taxes, fees, fines, licenses, and property taxes. All payments to government except payroll taxes and end-of-year corporate taxes.