Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q1 The committee set attainable initiatives. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 66.67% 4 33.33% 2 6 4.33 1 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q2 The committee completed Initiative 1: Incorporate an identification and prioritization process for institutional-wide needs onto the existing prioritization process Answered: 7 Skipped:.2.4.6.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 YES NO NOT SURE TOTAL WEIGHTED 85.71% 6 14.29% 1 7 2. 2 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q3 The committee completed Initiative 2: Provide opportunities for campus-wide training and communication on budget development and the Resource Allocation Process. Answered: 7 Skipped:.2.4.6.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 YES NO NOT SURE TOTAL WEIGHTED 71.43% 5 28.57% 2 7 2. 3 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q4 The committee completed Initiative 3: Complete review of Board Policy on District reserve and provide recommendation as needed. Answered: 7 Skipped:.2.4.6.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 YES NO NOT SURE TOTAL WEIGHTED 85.71% 6 14.29% 1 7 2. 4 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q5 The committee completed Initiative 4: Oversee the process in the Educational Master Plan and Facilities Master Plan development as outlined in the Integrated Planning Manual. Answered: 7 Skipped:.2.4.6.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 YES NO NOT SURE TOTAL WEIGHTED 85.71% 6 14.29% 1 7 2. 5 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q6 What initiatives would you recommend for next year? Answered: 1 Skipped: 6 6 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q7 Committee members received clear and timely meeting information. Answered: 7 Skipped: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 1 42.86% 3 28.57% 2 7 3.71 7 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q8 Committee members received appropriate budget materials to support decisions. Answered: 7 Skipped: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 85.71% 6 14.29% 1 7 4.14 8 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q9 Committee members received timely budget materials to support decisions. Answered: 7 Skipped: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 14.29% 1 71.43% 5 14.29% 1 7 3.71 9 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q1 I understood the Planning & Budget process well enough to provide critical input. Answered: 7 Skipped: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 1 57.14% 4 14.29% 1 7 3.71 1 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q11 The committee made decisions and recommendations in a timely and effective manner. Answered: 7 Skipped: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 85.71% 6 14.29% 1 7 4.14 11 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q12 The committee has the appropriate number of members. Answered: 7 Skipped: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 STRONGLY DISAGREE DISAGREE NEUTRAL AGREE STRONGLY AGREE TOTAL WEIGHTED 1 7 7 4. 12 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q13 The committee has appropriate representation. Answered: 7 Skipped: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 85.71% 6 14.29% 1 7 4.14 13 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q14 The committee s composition reflected an appropriate mix of skills, experience, backgrounds, and diversity. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 STRONGLY DISAGREE DISAGREE NEUTRAL AGREE STRONGLY AGREE TOTAL WEIGHTED 1 6 6 4. 14 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q15 Please list any training you would like regarding committee documents and/or processes. Answered: 1 Skipped: 6 15 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q16 Budget assumptions were received, updated, and changes to the assumptions requested by the committee were made. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 16.67% 1 5 3 33.33% 2 6 4.17 16 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q17 The 311 Quarterly reports were presented and there was an opportunity to ask questions. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 16.67% 1 66.67% 4 16.67% 1 6 4. 17 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q18 The Resource Allocation Rubric was used accurately to rank institutional needs. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 4 6 3.67 18 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q19 The weighting of the scoring areas on the rubric provide a fair assessment of the needs of the institution. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 4 6 3.67 19 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q2 Do you think additional scoring areas need to be added?.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 1 YES NO NOT SURE TOTAL WEIGHTED 66.67% 4 33.33% 2 6 1. 2 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q21 The technology needs were ranked according to institutional needs. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 66.67% 4 33.33% 2 6 3.33 21 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q22 The one-time needs were ranked according to institutional needs. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 5 3 5 3 6 3.5 22 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q23 The on-going needs were ranked according to institutional needs. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 4 6 3.67 23 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q24 The cluster presentations helped inform my subjective ranking. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 16.67% 1 5 3 33.33% 2 6 4.17 24 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q25 There was sufficient time allowed for cluster presentations. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 1 33.33% 2 33.33% 2 6 3.83 25 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q26 Allowing clusters to prioritize ten requests is an appropriate number. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 33.33% 2 5 3 16.67% 1 6 3.83 26 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q27 The resource allocation process were clear and easily understood. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 16.67% 1 66.67% 4 16.67% 1 6 4. 27 / 28
Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 216-217 Q28 Guidelines for the resource allocation process were properly enforced. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 16.67% 1 66.67% 4 16.67% 1 6 4. 28 / 28