Moody s/real Commercial Property Price Indices, January 2010

Similar documents
Moody s/real Commercial Property Price Indices, May 2010

Moody s/real Commercial Property Price Indices, December 2010

The ABCP Market. For the IMF Conference on Operationalizing Systemic Risk Monitoring, May 27, 2010

Mongolian Banking System

U.S. Municipal Market The View From the Markets Presentation to the Federal Reserve Banks of Chicago, New York and Philadelphia

City of Isle of Palms, SC

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 rating to Tustin Unified School District (USD) School Facilities Improvement District's (SFID) (CA) GO Bonds

Global Credit Research - 24 Feb 2012 ASSIGNS A2 RATING TO $24.6 MILLION G.O. BONDS, 2012 SERIES A & B

City of Tega Cay, SC. Annual Comment on Tega Cay RATING. ISSUER COMMENT 23 March 2018

OECD Workshop on Data Collection

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

The Early Warning Toolkit in Practice: Carillion PLC

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings

Underwriting standards for credit cards and auto loans tighten modestly, a positive

MOODY'S AFFIRMS Aa3 RATING ON THE CITY OF LIVONIA'S (MI) OUTSTANDING GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings in the European Union

Findlay City School District, OH

State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

Snohomish County Public Utility District 1

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to San Francisco Airport Commission, CA Series 2018B-G; outlook is stable 01 May 2018

Moody s/rca CPPI: Apartments the Early Riser Among Properties with Beds, Outshining Homes and Hotels March 2013

Regional Economic Outlook

Township of Tredyffrin, PA

Webinar Navigating Choppy Markets: Safety-First Equity Strategies Based on Credit Risk Signals

Rating Agencies: Just How Concerned Are You? 2:30-3:30 pm

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

Somerset Hills School District, NJ

Moody s Revised Rating Methodology: US Local Government General Obligation Debt

Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative

Celina Independent School District, TX

Edison (Township of) NJ

Port Jefferson Union Free School District, NY

Default Risk Jumps Sharply for Troubled Bank. Figure 1: Bankia SA s One-Year EDF Measure

Findlay City School District, OH

New Issue: Moody's assigns A1 to Grays Harbor County Public Utility District 1 (WA) electric revenue bonds

Township of Nutley, NJ

Struggling to Escape the Fallout of the Great Recession MARISA Di NATALE, MANAGING DIRECTOR

Announcement: Moody's Disclosures on Credit Ratings of Barbados, Government of Global Credit Research - 26 Mar 2012

Roselle Park Borough, NJ

Rockwall County, TX. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Above average socioeconomic indices. Credit Challenge

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Announcement: Moody's reviews five J-REITs ratings for downgrade

GIOA Conference Moody s Approach to Rating Government Investment Pools: CNAV and Bond Funds. Marty Duffy VP-Managed Investments Group

George W. Kuhn Drainage District (Oakland County), MI

The Early Warning Toolkit in practice: Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.

Policy on the "SEC Rule 17g-7 of Representation and Warranties" (R&Ws)

Challenging Issues and Alternative Approaches to CRE Credit Risk Modeling. RPC Conference, Scottsdale

Credit Opinion: Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco

Credit Opinion: Federal Home Loan Banks

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

Moody s Presentation to ACI Finance Committee

Butler (Village of), WI

Moody s Approach to Assessing Credit Risk for Oil & Gas Companies. Gretchen French Vice President and Senior Credit Officer Moody s Investors Service

Volusia County School District (FL)

Mount Street. Servicer Update - Quality of services in line with our expectations of a medium-sized third party servicer. ISSUER COMMENT 2 June 2016

City of Oakland, CA. Update to Credit Analysis. CREDIT OPINION 19 April Summary

New Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 to Oakland City's (CA) TRAN

Announcement: Moody's confirms Aaa ratings assigned to Erste Group Bank mortgage and public-sector covered bonds

Moody s Methodologies & Florida Update

ABN AMRO Bank N.V. Q1 2018: Higher impairment offset revenue growth. ISSUER COMMENT 16 May Summary opinion

Teachers Ins. and Annuity Assoc. of America

Ag Lending Experience of Living Through the Cycles

MooDY's. Regulatory Disclosures. Page 1 of5 INVESTORS SERVICE. Identifier: MDY:

Disruption in Higher Education: What Does It Mean For Credit Ratings

ISSUER COMMENT 02 DECEMBER 2014

3i Group plc. Update following the publication of first-half 2018 financial results. CREDIT OPINION 28 November Update

Westport (Town of) CT

Corporate Finance. Refinement to ABL Ratings. Special Comment. Moody s Global. Summary. January Table of Contents: Analyst Contacts:

Commercial & Ag Lending Conference 2017

Policy on Conflict of Interest Certification

CCAR 2019: A Very Tough Test

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

Connecticut (State of) State Revolving Fund

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Baa3 issuer rating to Eutelsat SA Global Credit Research - 28 Jan 2010

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades SURA Asset Management to Baa1; outlook stable

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aa1 issuer and bond ratings of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) with a stable outlook

Profit emergence under IFRS 17: Gaining business insight through projection models

Neo Investimentos. Manager Quality Analysis. ISSUER COMMENT 20 December Assessment Rationale

Masconomet Regional School District, MA

Metropolitan Water District of So. California

Town of Beekman, NY. Credit Strengths. Solid reserve and liquidity levels. Low debt burden with rapid repayment. Credit Challenges

Jersey City Community Charter School, NJ

The Impact of Hurricane Harvey on the U.S. Economy. Presentation Title, Date 1

Siauliu Bankas, AB. Siauliu Bankas capital metrics will strengthen with EBRD s debt-to-equity conversion. ISSUER COMMENT 13 August 2018

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3/Prime-1 issuer ratings to the Departement de L'Eure; stable outlook Global Credit Research - 07 Apr 2016

PT Indosat Tbk. Strong Revenue and Earnings Growth in FY2015 Supports Credit Profile. ISSUER COMMENT 28 March 2016

CIMIC GROUP UPGRADED TO Baa2, OUTLOOK STABLE, BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE

Prince William County, VA

Financial Guarantors. Special Comment

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Swedbank and Swedbank Mortgage to A1; P-1 ratings affirmed Global Credit Research - 04 Jun 2013

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Baa3 senior unsecured debt ratings of ICICI Bank's Bahrain branch Global Credit Research - 17 Aug 2017

Duquesne University, PA

CITYSPRING INFRASTRUCTURE TRUST. Credit Rating of Basslink Bonds

Financing Our Energy Future. Public Utility Research Center-University of Florida

Moody s/rca CPPI: Commercial Property Prices, Led by Apartment and CBD Office in Major Markets, Top Pre-crisis Peak November 2014

Policy for Analyst Rotation

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aaa rating to Livingston County's (MI) $2.4 million

New Issue: Moody's revises Pittsburgh PA's outlook to positive; affirms A1

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to Trinity Health Credit Group's (MI) Ser bonds; outlook revised to stable

Transcription:

JANUARY 20 STRUCTURED FINANCE SPECIAL REPORT Moody s/real Commercial Property Price Indices, January 20 Table of Contents: OVERVIEW 1 NATIONAL ALL PROPERTY TYPE AGGREGATE INDEX 4 APPENDIX 7 Analyst Contacts Nick Levidy Team Managing Director 1.212.553.4595 Nick.Levidy@moodys.com Andrea M. Daniels VP-Sr Credit Officer 1.212.553.4416 Andrea.Daniels@moodys.com Connie Petruzziello AVP-Analyst 1.212.553.4894 Concetta.Petruzziello@moodys.com Seth Anspach Senior Associate 1.212.553.7896 Seth.Anspach@moodys.com Overview After 13 consecutive months of declining property values, the Moody s/real Commercial Property Price Index (CPPI) measured a 1.0% increase in prices in November. Prices began falling over two years ago and significant declines were seen throughout 9, with several months experiencing 5%+ value drops. The 1.0% growth in prices seen in November is a small bright spot for the commercial real estate sector, which has seen values fall over 43% from the peak. Figure 1 Moody's/REAL Commercial Property Price Index (CPPI) National All Property Type Aggregate Index, December 0 = 180 160 140 120 Moody's/REAL CPPI 80 ADDITIONAL CONTACTS: Client Services Desk: 1.212.553.1653 Monitoring: Monitor.cmbs@moodys.com Website: www.moodys.com Based on data through the end of November 9.

Figure 2 Current Moody s/real CPPI and Change from Earlier Periods New This Period: National All Property Type Aggregate Repeated This Period: National Four Property Types Top 10 MSAs Four Property Types West Four Property Types East Four Property Types South Four Property Types Southern California Four Property Types MSA Office Markets New York, San Francisco, and Washington DC MSA Apartment Market Florida CURRENT INDEX M 1 MONTH EARLIER 1 YEAR EARLIER 2 YEARS EARLIER National All Property Type Aggregate 109.10 1.0% -33.5% -43.1% CURRENT INDEX Q 1 QUARTER EARLIER 1 YEAR EARLIER 2 YEARS EARLIER National - Apartments 117.61-10.9% -34.1% -38.9% National Industrial 120.60-8.1-29.6-36.8 National Office 113.24-12.2-30.1-35.9 National Retail 141.81 2.5-19.4-27.4 Top Ten MSAs 1 - Apartments 145.72-3.8-31.4-34.6 Top Ten MSAs- Industrial 139.19-10.4-26.4-29.7 Top Ten MSAs- Office 106.15-19.3-37.6-37.9 Top Ten MSAs- Retail 151.11-3.0-19.6-23.1 West Apartments 146.56-4.7-18.9-23.4 West Industrial 132.44-5.7-24.1-26.6 West Office.78 11.3-19.0-27.5 West Retail.86-6.0-19.0-24.0 CURRENT INDEX A 1 YEAR EARLIER 2 YEARS EARLIER East Apartments 170.84-13.2% -22.1% East Industrial 140.66-22.0-24.3 East Office 114.94-37.3-40.6 East Retail 134.43-31.9-36.2 South Apartments 77.38-51.8-53.3 South Industrial 104.65-39.7-46.3 South Office 114.36-34.7-36.7 South Retail 157.82-8.0-14.7 So. California Apartments.13-15.9-22.6 So. California Industrial 157.00-24.2-28.9 So. California Office 140.12-27.8-32.6 So. California Retail 169.28-22.9-25.4 New York Office 141.17-38.1-39.3 San Francisco Office 102.88-21.3-25.1 Washington DC Office 139.07-27.0-28.4 Florida Apartments 110.08-46.1-50.1 M Monthly series. Most recent data is through November 30, 9. Q Quarterly series. Most recent data is through the end of the 3rd quarter 9. Analysis is based on data from that 3rd quarter. 1 Top Ten MSAs refers to the ten MSAs with the most transactions by dollar volume, in each property type. A Annual series. Most recent data is through the end of the 3rd quarter 9. Analysis is based on data from four quarters (4Q08, 1Q09, 09 and 3Q09). Given that the measure is of a rolling four-quarter period, data as of the end of the 3rd quarter cannot be compared with that from the end of the previous quarter. 2 JANUARY 20 SPECIAL REPORT: MOODY'S/REAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY PRICE INDICES, JANUARY 20

The Moody s/real Commercial Property Price Indices (CPPI) measure the change in actual transaction prices for commercial real estate assets based on the repeat sales of the same assets at different points in time. 1 Notable Observations and Themes» The National All Property Type Aggregate Index measured a positive gain for the first time in more than a year. Values increased 1.0% in November, following several months of mild declines.» Transaction volume fell in November. Overall, 362 total sales were recorded, with an aggregate value of $4.1 billion.» We expect commercial real estate prices to decline further in the months ahead. Prices for properties with short term lease structures, such as multifamily, could show signs of a sustainable recovery later this year, while other property types will likely need longer to turn the corner. 1 A summary or short version of the repeat sales methodology is available in a Moody s Special Report. US CMBS: Moody s Publishes the First Commercial Property Price Indices Based on Commercial Real Estate Repeat Sales Data. Sept. 19, 7. This is available on Moodys.com > Research & Ratings > By Market Segment > Structured Finance > Commercial MBS > CRE Indices. A very detailed and complete explanation of the methodology is available in a White Paper from MIT. David Geltner and Henry Pollakowski. A Set of Indexes for Trading Commercial Real Estate Based on the Real Capital Analytics Transaction Prices Database. MIT Center for Real Estate. Sept. 26, 7. 3 JANUARY 20 SPECIAL REPORT: MOODY'S/REAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY PRICE INDICES, JANUARY 20

National All Property Type Aggregate Index The National All Property Type Aggregate Index is a monthly series, and this report is based on data through November 30, 9. Refer back to Figure 1. After April s record 8.6% drop in values, price declines as measured by the CPPI have been moderating. This month s 1.0% increase is the first time in 9 we have seen values move in a positive direction (see Figure 3). However, this month s positive return should not be taken as the allclear signal for commercial real estate. Overall, two years of generally falling prices have left property values 43% below the peak and we expect further declines in the aggregate CPPI in the months ahead. FIGURE 3 Moody s/real CPPI: Monthly Value Changes 4% Monthly Value Change (%) 2% 0% -2% -4% -6% -8% -10% This month s rise brings aggregate prices up slightly, to 43% below the peak. We expect prices to remain well below peak values with no sustained upturn for several quarters. The CPPI may exhibit some choppiness as transaction volume picks up and a bottom begins to form, but the overall price trend will continue downward over the near term. On a more positive note, the price declines from here on will almost certainly be milder than the large monthly price drops seen in the middle of 9. In short, the positive 1.0% return recorded in November represents a bit of good news for the commercial real estate market, but the sector is not yet out of the woods. Further deterioration in property fundamentals and increases in cap rates are anticipated, although the worst of the value declines is likely over. Figure 4 plots the CPPI and the Case Shiller Home Price Index, and shows that although value declines began first in the residential sector, the overall declines have been larger in commercial real estate. 4 JANUARY 20 SPECIAL REPORT: MOODY'S/REAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY PRICE INDICES, JANUARY 20

FIGURE 4 Moody s/real CPPI vs Case Shiller Index, December 0 = 180 160 140 120 80 Moody's/REAL CPPI Case Shiller Home Price Index Moody s/real CPPI data through November 9. Case Shiller Home Price Index data through October 9. According to the Case Shiller Index, home prices peaked in August of 6, more than one year before the peak in commercial real estate. Home prices then fell for more than two and a half years, bottoming out in April 9, with nearly a one-third value loss. Since April, prices have rebounded slightly but have seen no significant growth in the last two months returns. In contrast, commercial property prices fell further in a shorter amount of time. After two years of value declines, commercial real estate reached its lowest value yet in October 9, nearly 44% below the peak level. Prices in the commercial sector will rebound off the bottom as markets recover but we expect that commercial property prices will ultimately flatten out for the longer term at levels 30% to 40% below the peak. Overall Transaction Volume Transaction volume has stayed relatively consistent in 9, with November performance having a slight dip over the month before. Transaction volume is no longer in the freefall seen throughout 9 and further large declines are unlikely (see Figure 5). FIGURE 5 Moody's/REAL CPPI: Volume and Number of Total Sales Total Sales Volume ($ Million) [L] Total Number of Sales [R] Volume, $ Millions 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000-2800 2400 0 1600 1 800 400 0 11-06 2-07 5-07 8-07 11-07 2-08 5-08 8-08 11-08 2-09 5-09 8-09 11-09 Number Source: Real Capital Analytics 5 JANUARY 20 SPECIAL REPORT: MOODY'S/REAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY PRICE INDICES, JANUARY 20

There were 362 transactions in the overall market in November, with a total value of $4.1 billion. Of those transactions, 91 were repeat-sales used in calculating the CPPI. The 91 sales had a total value of $1.3 billion. The movement towards a higher proportion of lower priced assets being sold in a given period has also moderated in 9. In 6, less than half of all repeat-sales transactions were between $2.5 and $7.5 million (see Figure 6). By 7, that proportion had grown to slightly more than half of all properties sold. In 8, however, as prices were falling significantly and transaction volume was drying up, the share of properties that sold for more than $2.5 million and less then $7.5 million grew to over 60%. In 9, that proportion has not grown further. FIGURE 6 Moody's/REAL CPPI: Distribution Among Price Groups $2.5-$5 $5-$7.5 $7.5-$15 $15-$50 $50-$ over $ All of 6 All of 7 All of 8 9 YTD 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% % Share of All Repeat-Sales Transactions in that Period On the other end of the spectrum, whereas over 8% of properties sold for $50 million or more in 6, that share dropped to just under 7% in 7, and fell again to under 4% in 8. In 9, just under 3.5% of all properties sold were valued at $50 million and above. The attached Appendix includes the following:» A calendar summarizing the report cycle, i.e., which indices are updated in which month. The calendar also indicates the precise release dates for Moody s/real Indices in 20 (Figures 7, 8, and 9).» A listing of the cities included in the Top Ten Indices (Figure 10).» Charts for the 28 sub-indices that were not recalculated for this report. These are repeated from the previous report so that both data and charts for all indices, whatever the most recent calculation, are included here in one document for readers convenience (Figures 11 18). 6 JANUARY 20 SPECIAL REPORT: MOODY'S/REAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY PRICE INDICES, JANUARY 20

Appendix FIGURE 7 CPPI: Report Release Cycle 20 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH Jan. 20, 20 Feb. 22, 20 March 22, 20 Report to be released: Aggregate Aggregate Aggregate For period: November December January Based on data through: November 30 December 31 January 31 Report to be released: 12 Quarterly Indices (A) 16 Annual Indices (B) For period: 4th Quarter 4th Quarter Based on data through: December 31 December 31 APRIL MAY JUNE April 19, 20 May 19, 20 June 21, 20 Report to be released: Aggregate Aggregate Aggregate For period: February March April Based on data through: February 28 March 31 April 30 Report to be released: 12 Quarterly Indices (A) 16 Annual Indices (B) For period: 1st Quarter 1st Quarter Based on data through: March 31 March 31 JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER July 19, 20 Aug. 19, 20 Sept. 20, 20 Report to be released: Aggregate Aggregate Aggregate For period: May June July Based on data through: May 31 June 30 July 31 Report to be released: 12 Quarterly Indices (A) 16 Annual Indices (B) For period: 2nd Quarter 2nd Quarter Based on data through: June 30 June 30 OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER Oct. 19, 20 Nov. 22, 20 Dec. 20, 20 Report to be released: Aggregate Aggregate Aggregate For period: August September October Based on data through: August 31 September 30 October 31 Report to be released: 12 Quarterly Indices (A) 16 Annual Indices (B) For period: 3rd Quarter 3rd Quarter Based on data through: September 30 September 30 7 JANUARY 20 SPECIAL REPORT: MOODY'S/REAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY PRICE INDICES, JANUARY 20

FIGURE 8 (A) 12 Quarterly Indices include the following: APARTMENT RETAIL OFFICE INDUSTRIAL National Apartment Top 10 MSAs Apartment West Apartment National Retail Top 10 MSAs Retail West Retail National Office Top 10 MSAs Office West Office National Industrial Top 10 MSAs Industrial West Industrial FIGURE 9 (B) 16 Annual Indices with Quarterly Releases include the following: APARTMENT RETAIL OFFICE INDUSTRIAL East Apartment South Apartment So. California Apartment Florida Apartment East Retail South Retail So. California Retail East Office South Office So. California Office New York Office San Francisco Office Washington DC Office East Industrial South Industrial So. California Industrial FIGURE 10 Top Ten Cities by Property Type APARTMENT RETAIL OFFICE INDUSTRIAL Atlanta Dallas Houston Los Angeles New York Phoenix San Francisco Seattle South Florida Washington DC Atlanta Chicago Dallas Houston Los Angeles New York Phoenix San Francisco South Florida Washington DC Atlanta Boston Chicago Dallas Houston Los Angeles New York San Francisco Seattle Washington DC Atlanta Chicago Dallas Los Angeles New York San Diego San Francisco Seattle South Florida Washington DC 8 JANUARY 20 SPECIAL REPORT: MOODY'S/REAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY PRICE INDICES, JANUARY 20

FIGURE 11 Moody's/REAL CPPI: National Property Type Indices National Aggregate National Office National Retail National Apartments National Industrial Index, 4Q 0 = 4Q 00 1Q 02 02 02 02 03 03 03 03 04 04 04 04 05 05 05 05 06 06 06 06 07 07 07 07 08 08 08 08 09 3Q 09 09 FIGURE 12 Moody s/real CPPI: Top Ten MSAs Property Type Indices National Aggregate Top 10 Office Top 10 Retail Top 10 Apartments Top 10 Industrial Index, 4Q 0 = 4Q 00 1Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 3Q 02 02 02 02 03 03 03 03 04 04 04 04 05 05 05 05 06 06 06 06 07 07 07 07 08 08 08 08 09 09 09 FIGURE 13 Moody's/REAL CPPI: West Property Type Indices National Aggregate Office Retail Apartments Industrial Index,4Q 0 = 4Q 00 1Q 02 02 02 02 03 03 03 03 04 04 04 04 05 05 05 05 06 06 06 06 07 07 07 07 08 08 08 08 09 3Q 09 09 9 JANUARY 20 SPECIAL REPORT: MOODY'S/REAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY PRICE INDICES, JANUARY 20

FIGURE 14 Moody s/real CPPI: East Property Type Indices 2 National Aggregate * Office Retail Apartments Industrial Index, Q1 00-Q4 00 = Q4 00-Q3 Q4 -Q3 02 Q4 02-Q3 03 Q4 03-Q3 04 Q4 04-Q3 05 Q4 05-Q3 06 Q4 06-Q3 07 Q4 07-Q3 08 Q4 08-Q3 09 FIGURE 15 Moody's/REAL CPPI: South Property Type Indices 2 National Aggregate * Office Retail Apartments Industrial Index, Q1 00-Q4 00 = Q4 00-Q3 Q4 -Q3 02 Q4 02-Q3 03 Q4 03-Q3 04 Q4 04-Q3 05 Q4 05-Q3 06 Q4 06-Q3 07 Q4 07-Q3 08 Q4 08-Q3 09 FIGURE 16 Moody s/real CPPI: Southern California Property Type Indices 2 National Aggregate * Office Retail Apartments Industrial Index, Q1 00-Q4 00 = Q4 00-Q3 Q4 -Q3 02 Q4 02-Q3 03 Q4 03-Q3 04 Q4 04-Q3 05 Q4 05-Q3 06 Q4 06-Q3 07 Q4 07-Q3 08 Q4 08-Q3 09 10 JANUARY 20 SPECIAL REPORT: MOODY'S/REAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY PRICE INDICES, JANUARY 20

FIGURE 17 Moody s/real CPPI: Major Office Markets Indices 2 National Office San Francisco Office Washington DC Office New York Office Index, Q1 00-Q4 00 = Q4 00-Q3 Q4 -Q3 02 Q4 02-Q3 03 Q4 03-Q3 04 Q4 04-Q3 05 Q4 05-Q3 06 Q4 06-Q3 07 Q4 07-Q3 08 Q4 08-Q3 09 FIGURE 18 Moody s/real CPPI: Florida Apartment Index 2 National Apartments Florida Apartments Index, Q1 00-Q4 00 = Q4 00-Q3 Q4 -Q3 02 Q4 02-Q3 03 Q4 03-Q3 04 Q4 04-Q3 05 Q4 05-Q3 06 Q4 06-Q3 07 Q4 07-Q3 08 Q4 08-Q3 09 11 JANUARY 20 SPECIAL REPORT: MOODY'S/REAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY PRICE INDICES, JANUARY 20

Report Number: SF191126 20 Moody s Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODY S ). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ARE MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC.'S ( MIS ) CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MIS DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT CONSTITUTE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS ARE NOT RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MIS ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. Under no circumstances shall MOODY S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody s Corporation ( MCO ), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading Shareholder Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy. 12 JANUARY 20 SPECIAL REPORT: MOODY'S/REAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY PRICE INDICES, JANUARY 20