Colgate University Guidelines for Charging Expenses to Federally Funded Awards December 10, 2010

Similar documents
New Jersey Institute of Technology Number: University Policies and Procedures

MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING Administrative Policy Created October 2016 Cost Allocation Policy on Sponsored Agreements/Grants

Cost Accounting Standards at Stony Brook University

Charging of Direct Costs to Sponsored Projects: Policy

Cost Policy on Sponsored Agreements

Unallowable Cost Policy Revision Date: 8/18/17

ALLOWABLE COSTS ON GRANTS February 2010

SAM GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING THE ALLOWABILITY OF COSTS ON SPONSORED PROJECTS

Georgetown University Direct vs. Indirect Costs And Allowability on Federal Awards

PROCEDURE Determination of Allowable vs. Unallowable Expenses

BASICS OF CHARGING COSTS TO A SPONSORED PROJECT. Table of Contents

ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE LETTER

Iowa State University Sponsored Programs Costing Policy For Awards Subject to OMB Circular A-21 (2 CFR 220)

2018 V2. Federal Costing Principles

University of Connecticut FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF SERVICE CENTERS Policy CADS-3 Date Issued: June 19, 1998 I. PURPOSE This Policy Statement

Proposal Budget Basics

Indirect Costs (Facilities and Administrative Costs or F&A)

SAMPLE ORGANIZATION Model Cost Allocation Plan

HARVARD UNIVERSITY. Guidelines for Federal Sponsored Expenditures

December Facilities and Administrative Costs Primer The Research Foundation for The State University of New York

OMB CIRCULAR A-133 COMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENTS INCLUDING ARRA AWARDS

COLORADO STATE UNIVESITY Financial Procedure Instructions FPI 2-7

Charging Expenses to Sponsored Awards

North Dakota State University Policy Manual

DIRECT COST POLICY (DIRECT CHARGING OF COSTS TO SPONSORED PROJECTS) GRADUATE SCHOOL POLICY STATEMENT

Harvard University. Guidelines for Federal Sponsored Expenditures

Today s Topics. Cost Principles. Federal Guidance. Guidance Resources. Purpose of Cost Principles. Cost Principles Overview 5/7/2015

Unrelated Business Income Taxes (UBIT)

Western Michigan University Federal Costing Principles Policy

VUMC Academic Enterprise Accounting for Unallowable Costs

UD COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS GUIDELINES

Coordinator of Research Communication

Campus Administrative Policy

DIVISION OF RESEARCH RECHARGE FACILITIES OPERATING PROCEDURES. August SW 8th Street MARC 430 Miami, FL

Policy on Cost Allocation, Cost Recovery, and Cost Sharing

SERVICE CENTER POLICY

BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY POLICY

Facilities & Administrative Costs: Balancing Sponsor Requirements and Institutional Needs

A MESSAGE FROM CAROLINE C. WHITACRE

Allowable Costs. Exception to Direct or Indirect Cost Category. Item of Cost Description Normally Direct or Indirect Cost

CHARGING PRACTICES FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED GRANTS AND CONTRACTS 2009 (Revised) UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS

University of Mississippi Medical Center Policy on Service Centers

Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children s Hospital of Chicago Cost Transfer Policy Federal Awards (effective date: 9/1/17)

pre-award costs alcoholic beverages proposal costs entertainment fines lobbying

TEDDY BEARS AGAINST VIOLENCE

Charging Directly to Sponsored Projects Costs that are Normally Considered Indirect

Cost Accounting Standards & Disclosure Statement

POLICY. Number: Sponsored Research Cost Sharing Responsible Office: Research & Innovation

OFFICIAL POLICY. Policy Statement

Sponsored Expenditures Guidelines

Illinois Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Understanding the Uniform Guidance and Indirect Cost Rate March 16, 2016

UAHuntsville. The University of Alabama in Huntsville

Salary & Wages Fringe Benefits Equipment Travel Participant Support. BUDGET CATEGORIES (click on image to go to page)

INDIRECT COSTS. Yes, there are several different types of indirect cost rates. Examples include:

General Rules for the Use of Funds Deposited or Held in KUCR Accounts

Davis Technical College Restricted Fund Accounting Sponsored Project Contracts, Custom Fit, & Grants

Title: Business Expense Policy and Guidelines Prepared by: Controller s Office Administrator: University Controller Created: July 1, 2012

SAN DIEGO WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP, INC University Avenue, Ste 400 San Diego, CA (619) OPERATIONS ISSUANCE

Standard Operating Procedures. NETT Financial Plan

New York University UNIVERSITY POLICIES

Preventing Unallowable Costs

MSU Federal/State Cost Policy

PART 3 COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS

The University Maryland Baltimore County

Research Administration Start to Finish. (GC1000) Complete Course

Allowable Costs. Division of Financial Services Sponsored Programs

Project Managers are expected to apply this guidance document when charging direct or indirect costs to grants.

Dartmouth College. Service and Recharge Center Policies and Procedures. Dartmouth College Office of the Controller

Procedures for Service Centers

Selected Items of Cost - Exhibit 1. States, Local Governments, Indian Tribes. Allowable with restrictions Unallowable Unallowable Unallowable

SERVICE CENTER GUIDELINES

Boston College: OFFICE FOR SPONSORED PROGRAMS Definitions and Glossary of Terms

FINAL DRAFT New Jersey Institute of Technology Number: University Policies and Procedures Date of Issue: October 12, 2011

University of Central Florida

SERVICE CENTERS. This policy has been established to ensure compliance with Federal regulations.

An Introduction to Facilities & Administrative Rates

Cost Items that Require Prior Written Approvals

Accounting Overview Training

Uniform Guidance vs. OMB Circulars

University of Missouri System Accounting Policies and Procedures

Chargebacks California State University, Fresno May 1995 Revised June 21, 2007 Policy No. B-08.1

Effective Date: 01/25/2013. Supersedes: 08//2008. Responsible Authority: Division of Research Director, Research Accounting

Allowability of Costs Federal Programs

INDIRECT COSTS. A Direct Explanation. July 18, What Federal Regulations Govern?

UCSF Sales and Service Center Policy Guidance and Procedures Manual

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS

UNDERSTANDING FACILITIES & ADMINISTRATIVE (INDIRECT) COSTS AT GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY

Capital Area Council of Governments FY 2019 Cost Policy Statement and Cost Allocation Plan

Identifying Unallowable Costs under Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) 505 and the OMB Uniform Guidance

Understanding F&A Rates. OPTIONAL SUBHEAD HERE Sara Tarkington January 23 rd, 2018

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA Office for Research and Sponsored Programs (ORSP) COST TRANSFER PROCEDURES

PARTICIPANT SUPPORT GUIDANCE

Chargeback Policy and Procedures

Capital Area Council of Governments FY 2018 Cost Policy Statement and Cost Allocation Plan

University of Connecticut DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS OF FEDERAL GRANTS AND CONTRACTS. Policy CADS1 Date Issued: June 19, 1998 Updated December 26, 2014

Direct Charging of Administrative and Clerical Salaries to Federal Awards

Inter-Department Invoice Voucher may sometimes be necessary to:

Two main Goals. Budgeting for Sponsored Projects 2/21/2018 WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY. Template-WSU Hrz 201.ppt 1.

DIVISION OF RESEARCH, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & ENGAGEMENT OGC POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Proposal Budgeting 101 Why budgets are more than just a bunch of numbers

Transcription:

I. Policy Statement Colgate University expects that every member of its faculty and staff will comply with all government and institutional rules and regulations in the management of sponsored projects. It is the responsibility of the Principal Investigator (PI) to ensure compliance when spending funds on a sponsored project. II. Purpose This policy defines expenses that are allowable, how expenses should be charged to sponsored projects and it explains the difference between direct costs and indirect costs. In this policy, a sponsored project is defined as any federally funded award, sub-award, contract, subcontract or other agreement. III. IV. Who Should be Knowledgeable about this Policy a. Principal Investigator (PI) b. Controller c. Assistant Controller d. Associate Provost e. Corporate, Foundation, and Government Relations (Grants Office) Applicable Federal Regulations: Four Guiding Principles According to OMB Circular A-21, Cost Principles for Educational Institutions, there are four guiding principles to assist in determining whether it is appropriate to charge a given cost to a sponsored project: reasonableness, allocability, allowability, and consistency. The criteria apply for both direct and indirect costs. All charges must pass the following four tests: They must be reasonable. They are recognized as necessary for the operation of the institution or the performance of the agreement. The nature of the commodities or services acquired or applied, and the amounts involved reflect the action that a prudent person would have taken under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision to incur the cost was made. They must be allocable. They must be incurred solely to advance the work under a sponsored project, or benefit both the sponsored project and other work of the institution, in proportions that can be approximated through the use of reasonable methods. They must be allowable. The charges must not be designated as unallowable under Section J of OMB Circular A-21, and must adhere to agency-specific policies, terms and conditions regarding specific items of cost, and other University policies. 1

They must be treated consistently. Costs incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstances, should be treated consistently as either direct or indirect costs of sponsored programs. This means any expenditure, including salaries and wages, lab and office supplies, equipment repair and maintenance, and services, all departments across the university must treat that cost in the same manner. V. Procedural Statement / Implementation This policy outlines how expenditures should be budgeted, charged and consistently applied to sponsored projects in order to meet external regulations. The PI is responsible for reviewing, approving and charging all direct costs to his/her sponsored project. The Assistant Controller is responsible for reviewing all purchases, all expenditures and notifying the PI of any inappropriate charges which must then be corrected. (See Award Monitoring Policy.) The Assistant Controller is responsible for setting up the project with the correct indirect cost rate and base and to confirm that the appropriate amount of indirect cost is charged to the sponsored project. VI. Application of Allowability Standards at Colgate a. Direct Costs: A direct cost of a sponsored project is one that can be identified specifically with that sponsored project or that can be assigned to a sponsored project with relative ease and a high degree of accuracy. General cost categories that may be charged as direct costs to individual sponsored projects include, but are not limited to: salaries, wages, and related fringe benefit costs of sponsored project personnel. Such individuals typically include PI s, Co-Investigators, research staff, and lab technicians. Salaries, wages, and fringe benefits for administrative personnel (such as administrative assistants) should not be charged directly to a sponsored project since these costs are reimbursed through the facilities and administrative (indirect) rate. Note: individual awards may provide for specific exceptions when these costs may be charged directly; laboratory, scientific, and technical materials, services and supplies obtained from internal as well as external vendors; scientific equipment costs (general equipment such as copiers or computers for use on multiple projects should not be charged directly to a sponsored project); travel costs; consultant/subcontract costs; 2

lab notebooks, data storage supplies and report binders, and other supplies that are used exclusively in support of the project and are consumed completely in the course of the project (office supplies are generally not allowable, see exceptions below); and other direct costs as specifically required, budgeted, and/or approved as necessary to accomplish the purpose of the individual sponsored project b. Indirect Costs: Indirect costs of sponsored projects are those that are incurred for common or joint objectives and cannot be identified readily or specifically with a particular sponsored project, or any other institutional activity. Colgate uses a negotiated rate that is a percentage of salaries and wages. Costs that are normally charged as indirect costs include, but are not limited to: salaries, wages, and fringe benefits for administrative personnel (see previous section); costs related to the university s physical infrastructure, including building and equipment depreciation (or use allowance), interest associated with external debt issuances to finance facilities-related projects, and operations and maintenance (i.e. utilities, janitorial services); sponsored-project administrative costs including the offices of Accounting & Control and Corporate, Foundation, and Government Relations; costs of the university s libraries; and materials, supplies, and services of a more general nature, such as office supplies, general/administrative copying services, and office equipment maintenance. c. Exceptions Charging Indirect-type Costs as Direct Costs: In certain circumstances, costs that are normally charged as indirect costs to sponsored projects may be charged as direct costs. Justification for these types of charges must be well documented by the PI and approved by the Assistant Controller. Circumstances where direct charging of indirect costs as direct costs include, but are not limited to: 1) Photocopies: These expenses are allowable direct charges to a sponsored project only if it can be documented that there is a direct benefit to the project (e.g. surveys). 2) Office Supplies: These expenses are allowable direct charges to a sponsored project only if it can be documented that there is a significantly greater amount required for a project than would normally be consumed (e.g. a large number of envelopes are needed to mail surveys). 3

3) Meetings and Conferences: Costs of meetings and conferences, whose primary purpose is the dissemination of technical information, can be charged to a sponsored project if it is specifically provided for in the awarded budget. d. Unacceptable Direct Charging Practices: Costs must be timely and meet the terms and conditions of the sponsored project award and a test of reasonableness. It is the responsibility of the PI to monitor the sponsored project award budget and ensure that purchases are made in a timely and appropriate manner, as purchases should be consumed while benefiting the project to which they are charged. The following are inappropriate direct charging practices: 1) cost-shifting in order to meet budget or funding deficiencies; 2) assigning costs to other sponsored projects in order to avoid sponsor restrictions; 3) assigning equipment or supply expenditures at the end of a project. Any significant purchases made towards the end of a project period are highly suspect, as it is generally not reasonable to expect that such items will be able to benefit the award; 4) increasing salary expenses on a project with an available balance when it is not consistent with the actual effort expended; 5) charging an expense exclusively to one sponsored project when the expense was used to support other activities; 6) assigning expenses to a sponsored project before the cost is incurred; and 7) assigning expenses that are part of the normal administrative support for sponsored projects (e.g. proposal preparation or accounting for the project) e. Charging Expenses to Multiple Projects If an expense benefits two or more sponsored projects in proportions that can be determined without undue effort or cost, the expenditures should be allocated to the project proportionally. If proportions cannot be determined due to interrelationship of the work, then costs may be allocated using another reasonable basis. The following are some appropriate allocation methodologies: Effort; Space; Head count; FTEs per project; Number of experiments; Percent (%) PI time in lab; and Percent (%) of lab-staff time in lab. The following are prohibited allocation methodologies: Splitting the costs evenly across projects; 4

Project budgets; and Available funds. For any allocation basis used, written support should exist, on a case by case basis, to describe how the allocation was determined. f. Unallowable costs: Certain types of expenses are unallowable as either direct or indirect costs. OMB Circular A-21, Section J provides a list of expenditure types that are typically unallowable. In general, the items of cost indicated below should not be charged to a federally sponsored project, in whole or in part, UNLESS the award dictates allowability, and there is a justifiable need for the item in the awarding agency approved proposal budget. Advertising/Public Relations Losses on Sponsored Agreements (overruns) Memberships in Community Organizations/Social Clubs Marketing Costs Student Activity Costs First Class Air Travel Lobbying Costs Interest Expense for Operating Procedures Honoraria Alcoholic Beverages Alumni Activities Bad Debts Charitable Contributions Entertainment Fines and Penalties Office supplies Subscriptions VII. Other Applicable Policies a. Procurement Policy b. Travel Policy c. Award Monitoring 5