Appendix II Township of Georgian Bay 2008 Water & Sewer Capacity Allocation Strategy MacTier November, 2009 Jointly prepared by the Township of Georgian Bay and The District Municipality of Muskoka
A. A. INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Maximizing the efficient use of water and sewage capacity in MacTier is an important component of the future physical and financial planning for both the Township of Georgian Bay and The District Municipality of Muskoka. Therefore, a Water and Sewage Capacity Allocation Strategy has been prepared for the consideration of, and use by both Township and Muskoka Councils in order to address the allocation of the existing and future water and sewage capacity for MacTier. This strategy would satisfy the requirement contained in Section H.10 of the Muskoka Official Plan as well as Section 1.1.3.2 (a) and 1.6.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS, 2005). The primary focus of this Capacity Allocation Strategy is to track and manage sewer and water servicing capacity in a manner that provides for continued growth in all land use categories (commercial, industrial, residential and institutional). A formally adopted strategy also adds the element of equity and fairness to the process of capacity estimation and allocation. It clarifies for the development community and public at large, how a finite public resource will be managed to ensure maximum benefits to the Township and Muskoka. The successful administration of the strategy will require the on-going participation of the Township of Georgian Bay and The District Municipality of Muskoka since both have an equal interest in ensuring that servicing capacity exists, and is managed on an ongoing basis to provide for reasonable growth in the Township s urban centres. Currently, sufficient development commitments are in place for both water and sewage capacity to provide for growth within MacTier. The present use based on flows of the water treatment facility is approximately 63%, while the use based on flows of the sewage treatment facility is approximately 13%. If the existing servicing commitments are taken into account (this excludes partial approvals such as draft approved subdivisions), the MacTier water treatment facility would be operating at 78% capacity and the sewage treatment facility would be operating at 29% capacity. B. STRATEGY STRATEGY BASIS BASIS Function of the strategy In order to provide for continued development opportunities, it is critical to ensure that over time, inactive projects do not hold capacity allocation while other development approvals are delayed pending receipt of limited servicing capacity. Planning approvals will proceed through the usual process. However, approvals will be granted in a manner that ensures servicing capacity is allocated to those projects or portions of projects, which will proceed to actual construction within a reasonable time frame. The performance requirements, which are tied to development approvals, are intended to prevent a few large proposals from holding capacity allocation over time, and thereby precluding other proposals from proceeding. Purpose of the Strategy 1. To provide and maintain a strategy for a managed approach to capacity estimation and allocation. 2. To facilitate the continued servicing of development in all land use types. 3. To provide clear identification as to whom and under what conditions capacity will be allocated.
4. To deal equitably and reasonably with the development sector with maximum benefits to the entire community. 5. To provide a clear basis for the allocation of sewer and water capacity. 6. To encourage the efficient provision and staging of services within the Township and promote conservation within the total system. Principles of the Strategy 1. Continued development and movement of projects including all land use types through the development approval process will be facilitated (provided there is capacity). 2. Reasonable assignment of capacity at one time (ie. 20 ERUs or less) will be allocated in a way that ensures it is used up within a reasonable time frame and cannot be held without performance. 3. Capacity will be reserved for public or community related projects (e.g. a community centre), and projects, which are deemed to be in the public interest. C. STRATEGY C. STRATEGY Strategy Components The Water and Sewer Capacity Allocation Strategy is composed of several components including: the estimation and tracking of capacity; the capacity allocation procedure (CAP); conservation measures; and associated infrastructure planning. Capacity tracking tables are used to monitor reserve capacity in relation to planning and development approvals. The Water & Sewer Capacity Tracking Tables (2008) and the plant capacity estimates, resources, methodology and assumptions used to update the sewage and water tracking tables are attached as Appendix A. The Capacity Allocation Procedure (CAP) identifies under what conditions capacity will be assigned. The CAP is described in terms of the categories established in the tracking tables, and is monitored as the tables are updated on an annual basis. Reserve capacity can be preserved or expanded through the implementation of conservation measures, and consequently this is an important element of the strategy. Finally, the allocation strategy identifies at what point associated infrastructure planning related to water and sewer capacity should be triggered. Administration of the Strategy A technical working group comprised of Muskoka and Township of Georgian Bay planning and engineering staff representatives advise Muskoka and Township Councils, as is required on an ongoing basis, with respect to the administration of the strategy. The servicing capacity situation within the Township of Georgian Bay changes over time, and consequently, the strategy is not intended to be a static document rather, additional modifications may be required in the future to reflect changing circumstances.
Estimation of Capacity Early in each year, available plant servicing capacity is estimated by subtracting the average flow of the previous three years from the design capacity of the water or sewage treatment facility. The annual maximum day pump records for the previous three years are averaged to establish a representative existing demand with respect to water. For sewage treatment capacity, annual average day records for the previous three years are averaged to establish a representative existing demand. For simplicity and ease of understanding, capacity is referred to in terms of equivalent residential units (ERUs), which is a calculation of the capacity that is required for a single family residential unit. Using the recorded flows for water and sewer described above, an estimate of commitments is based on 2.0 m 3 /d per ERU for water demands and on 1.0 m 3 /d per ERU for sewage flows. The specific ERU calculations are included in Appendix A. This estimation of capacity deals with the capacity of water and sewage treatment facilities, and does not take the capacity of the water distribution and sewage collection systems into account. The capacity within these systems may also affect the ability to service a particular area of the MacTier urban centre. Development Tracking Tables The tracking tables identify the reserve capacity in each facility and the servicing commitments related to specific development proposals. A servicing capacity commitment is made when an agreement with the District of Muskoka assigning capacity is executed when final approval of a project is granted, or when a holding provision is removed and the project can proceed to construction. The tracking tables have been divided into categories, which indicate the level of servicing commitment to, and allocation status for individual projects in terms of the associated planning approval and the ability to obtain a building permit. The servicing allocation necessary for each project is identified on the tracking tables and the type of use is also recorded. Category 1 projects have servicing capacity commitments and can proceed or have proceeded to construction. Category 2 includes projects which have partial planning approval, but which have not been allocated capacity. Category 3 includes planning applications that are under consideration. The Allocation Reserve is the capacity that exists once existing flows and Category 1 commitments have been taken into account and is the reserve from which capacity can be allocated. The allocation reserve is identified at the end of Category 1 on the tracking tables. The technical working group updates the water and sewer development tracking tables. The technical working group also estimates the capacity and commitments identified in the tracking tables. The tracking tables are revised by removing those developments that are constructed and occupied during the preceding year. They are also updated to reflect changes in planning status and to add new proposals. The methodology used to update the tracking tables is summarized in Appendix A. The updated tracking tables are provided for both Muskoka and Township Councils as well as to other groups, or individuals upon request. E. D. CAPACITY ALLOCATION ALLOCATION PROCEDURE PROCEDURES Capacity Allocation Procedures have been designed for use over time as available sewage and water capacity changes. The amount of available capacity for allocation determines which allocation procedure should be implemented at any one time.
A Capacity Allocation Procedure (CAP) is implemented until 95% of the design capacity is committed in order to ensure that allocation of capacity is tracked and managed in a way that will provide for continued growth in all sectors over time. This procedure is also intended to ensure that allocation of capacity and the granting of development approvals is not hampered by projects, which do not proceed to construction. A Limited Capacity Allocation Procedure (LCAP) is applied in situations where available capacity is limited, and would be initiated when 95% of the design capacity is committed (actual flows and Category 1 projects). The procedures and criteria for assigning capacity are set out as follows for each category of development. Category 1 Definition: Projects which have a capacity commitment including: (i) Identified existing vacant lots of record (ERUs are allocated in accordance with current zoning); (ii) Registered and draft approved plans of subdivision and condominium descriptions with registered sewer and water servicing agreements; (iii) Special projects (ie. redevelopment projects which do not require any zone change); and (iv) The Special Community Reserve, illustrated at the bottom of the Category 1 tracking chart, which represents a special reserve to be held and used for projects that are publicly initiated, or deemed to be in the public interest. Capacity Allocation Procedure (CAP) (i) Existing lots and projects with capacity allocation identified in agreements with the District of Muskoka and that are eligible for building permits may proceed to develop. (ii) Capacity may be assigned from the Special Community Reserve by Township Council to community special projects or development projects that benefit and are in the public or community interest (such as affordable housing, community facilities, and education facilities). (iii) The capacity of the water and sewage treatment plants, including any capacity drawn from the special community reserve, shall not be exceeded. Distribution of capacity to each land use category will be monitored by the technical working group. Reports will be provided to Township Council, as required and will include identification of the level of commitment in each land use sector in order to assist Township and District Councils in ensuring that an appropriate balance is achieved. Limited Capacity Allocation Procedure (LCAP) (i) Provided there is sufficient capacity in the water and sewage treatment plants, projects with an agreement assigning capacity, and existing lots that are eligible for building permits, may proceed to develop. (ii) Development that has a servicing commitment and is not expected to proceed with immediate construction may be requested to defer connection (through the use of agreements or the holding category) until additional capacity is available (e.g. through infrastructure changes). (Projects which defer connection would move to Category 2). Any
capacity recovered due to connection deferral may be returned to the Category 1 allocation reserve for re-distribution. Down zoning may be considered where development is not expected to proceed. (iii) Properties may be down zoned or placed in a holding category so that the ERU allocation can be transferred to another property owned by the same individual. This procedure must be carefully applied and equity must be achieved. Any transfer must not assign additional development rights or result in an unfair advantage to any individual or company. (Properties down zoned or subject to a holding provision would be moved to Category 2). (iv) Capacity may be allocated from the allocation reserve to minor residential infill proposals (including severances and zoning by-laws) within the areas now serviced and designated for urban use, provided that the net increase is not greater than 1 ERU or 1 additional residential lot per property, per year. (v) Capacity allocation for projects other than the minor residential infilling identified above, which would be constructed prior to the commissioning of the new plant, will require individual review and approval by the Township and the District of Muskoka. The technical working committee will review the individual requests and make recommendations to Township Council respecting allocation. Community projects, projects that are in the public interest and any other circumstances Township Council identifies, may warrant allocation. Allocation to commercial, industrial and community projects will take priority. Performance requirements would also be necessary in these situations. (vi) The Category 1 special community reserve shall not be exceeded. Assignment of capacity will be monitored by the technical working group and reports will be provided to Township Council and District Council, as required. Reports will include identification of the level of commitment in each land use sector. Category 2 Definition: Projects, or parts of projects with partial planning approvals, but which have not been assigned a capacity allocation, and includes: (i) Draft approved plans of subdivision and condominium descriptions which do not have a registered servicing agreement and therefore have not assigned a capacity allocation; (ii) Applications for consent; (iii) Properties zoned for use, but which require a servicing agreement or the removal of the holding category; (iv) Applications or proposals under appeal; and (v) Projects which require greater allocation than is currently available. Capacity Allocation Procedure (CAP): Plans of Subdivision/Condominium Descriptions (i) As specified in the conditions of draft approval, the individual phases of plans of subdivision or condominium descriptions or applications for the lifting of part lot control or holding provisions, will proceed to final approval in phases. In order to ensure that the remaining capacity in the water and sewage treatment plants is equitably allocated to development proposals throughout MacTier, the District agreements assigning capacity will generally
assign not more than 20 ERUs per phase of a development proposal. Subsequent phase(s) will not be allocated further capacity until the preceding phase has been registered, it has been serviced by municipal water and sewer, and the proponent has satisfactorily demonstrated to the District of Muskoka and the Township that construction is proceeding. (ii) As specified in conditions of draft approval, final approval will be dependent upon the availability of water and sewage treatment plant capacity. (iii) Holding provisions may be applied to phases of, or blocks within, a plan of subdivision that do not have servicing allocation, but may wish to proceed with zoning approval. Consents (i) A condition of a provisional decision to grant consent will be required which states that an agreement assigning capacity must be completed prior to final approval of the proposal. Zoning By-laws and Amendments (i) For projects other than residential infill or projects requiring a minor amount of capacity, a holding provision will be incorporated in a zoning by-law which could be lifted once an agreement assigning capacity has been registered against the title of the lands. This would provide reasonable assurance that the project will proceed once capacity is allocated. Limited Capacity Allocation Procedure (LCAP): (i) Unless Township Council has granted a special allocation, final approval of plans of subdivision or condominium descriptions, the lifting of part lot control and the removal of holding categories shall not proceed until the works necessary to provide sufficient capacity are commissioned and a servicing agreement has been signed. The conditions of draft approval shall detail this requirement. (ii) Requests for an extension to draft approval will be reviewed and draft approval may be permitted to lapse where capacity is not expected to be taken up and is preventing other projects from proceeding. (iii) Limited development proposals (ie. consent, zoning amendment, or part lot control applications) may proceed provided that the net allocation increase is not greater than 4 ERUs, per property, per year. (iv) Redevelopment proposals which do not require an increased ERU allocation, but which require a planning approval, may proceed. Performance guarantees will be required, where appropriate. (v) The holding category will be used for re-zonings (other than residential infill or limited development requiring a minor amount of capacity) in order to facilitate phasing and/or to defer final allocation until construction is to proceed and ensure performance. The holding provision would be removed when there is sufficient capacity in the water and sewage treatment plants, an agreement assigning capacity has been signed, a satisfactory site plan is submitted and a building permit and associated fee is submitted in order to ensure that capacity will not be held by development that is not proceeding.
Category 3 Definition: Development applications without planning approval or allocation including: (i) Official Plan Amendment (OPA) applications requiring approval or OPAs with further requirements; (ii) Applications for plans of subdivision or condominium descriptions which have been deemed complete applications; (iii) Development applications under consideration (consents, zoning by-law, etc.); and (iv) Developments that would require an expansion of the existing facilities in order to obtain sufficient capacity. Capacity Allocation Procedure (CAP): Plans of Subdivision or Condominium Descriptions (i) Where capacity is available, plans of subdivision or condominium descriptions may proceed to draft approval, provided that the plan or description is phased. Phasing will be determined according to individual circumstances taking into account matters such as economic viability, on and off site servicing requirements, ability to construct, amongst other matters (generally not more than 20 ERUs per phase). (ii) As specified in the conditions of draft approval, the individual phases of plans of subdivision or condominium descriptions or applications for the lifting of part lot control or holding provisions, will proceed to final approval in phases. A District agreement assigning capacity requiring performance and including securities for each phase will be required as a condition of approval. (Once the draft approval is granted the plan would move to a Category 2 project). Agreements assigning capacity may also deal with those situations where a plan of subdivision of condominium description includes a future development block or blocks that are proposed to develop by part lot control. Alternatively, a holding provision in the zoning bylaw may also be used if the block is to proceed via part lot control or other means. In either case, the holding category would not be removed until Muskoka has confirmed that there is available capacity in the water and sewage treatment plants, capacity is allocated through an agreement assigning capacity and the previous phase of the development is completed. Supplemental agreements or the removal of the holding category will not occur until Muskoka confirms available capacity and evidence has been provided that the preceding phase of development has been completed to the satisfaction of the Township and the District of Muskoka. (iii) Where a plan of subdivision or condominium description will proceed in one phase, the conditions of draft approval will require that the municipal agreements assigning capacity contain performance clauses applicable from the date of allocation of capacity (performance required in a specified time period generally in one to two years with 100% securities). Holding categories may be implemented, where appropriate, to ensure performance. The measures outlined in (ii) above may be used in order to ensure that an appropriate assignment of allocation occurs. Zoning By-laws and Amendments (i) Zoning by-laws and by-law amendments will include provisions to limit the type of use, area zoned and/or square footage of a development in order to establish basic ERU allocation and eliminate as of right high water users and sewage generators.
(ii) Holding categories will be implemented where there is a reasonable expectation that the development will proceed or as detailed above. Other (i) Allocation to projects which are proposed on the basis of a single water or sewage service will only be permitted in accordance with Section H.7 of the Muskoka Official Plan. Limited Capacity Allocation Procedure (LCAP): (i) Limited development proposals (ie. consent, zoning amendment, or part lot control applications) may proceed provided that the net allocation increase is not greater than 4 ERUs, per property, per year. (ii) Redevelopment proposals which do not require an increased ERU allocation, but which require a planning approval, may proceed. Performance guarantees will be required, where appropriate. (iii) Unless Township Council has granted a special allocation, draft or final approval of plans of subdivision or condominium descriptions that do not have existing services and the removal of holding categories shall not proceed until the works necessary to provide sufficient capacity are commissioned and an agreement assigning capacity has been executed. (iv) The holding category will be used for rezonings (other than residential infill or limited development requiring a minor amount of capacity) in order to facilitate phasing and/or to defer final allocation until construction is to proceed and ensure performance. The holding provision would be removed when there is sufficient capacity in the water and sewage treatment plants, an agreement assigning capacity has been signed, a satisfactory site plan is submitted and a building permit and associated fee is submitted in order to ensure that capacity will not be held by development that is not proceeding. E. F. CONSERVATION CONSERVATION Conservation measures are an integral part of any allocation strategy, since these measures can be successful in acquiring additional reserve capacity, or extending existing capacity. Conservation efforts should be implemented, to ensure that water and sewer facilities are used in the most efficient manner possible. Options currently being considered or are currently in use include: Ensuring the water and sewage rate structure encourages conservation and reuse; Identifying and promoting conservation opportunities for new and renovation projects at the time building permits are being processed; and Eliminating roof and foundation drainage discharge to the sanitary system. Conservation measures such as these can ensure the efficient use of available capacity so that sufficient capacity is available over time to accommodate growth. Conservation methods will be investigated on an on-going basis and recommendations will be provided for the consideration of both Councils.
G. F. ASSOCIATED ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING PLANNING Areas to be Serviced Servicing schedules which illustrate the extent of the area to be serviced have been included in the Township Official Plan. Associated servicing policies are also included in the Township Official Plan and are implemented through the planning process. Facilities Expansion Generally, at the time that the facility flow is at 80% of the design capacity and sufficient demand for servicing capacity is demonstrated in the tracking tables, the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) or a system optimization study would be initiated to provide for additional capacity. The actual facility flow and servicing commitments (Category 1), must not exceed 100% of design capacity and, as a target, the summary of the actual facility flows plus Category 1 and the planning approvals in Category 2, should not represent more than 150% of the design capacity.
APPENDIX A Sewer and Water Tracking Tables (2008) MacTier Introduction The following is a summary of the plant capacity estimates, resources, methodology and technical assumptions used to update the sewer and water tracking tables for the community of MacTier for the year 2008. Sewer and water capacity is expressed in terms of "Equivalent Residential Units" (ERUs). Generally, the three year average of recorded flows is used and an estimate of commitments is based on a maximum daily flow of 2.0 m3/day per ERU for water demand and an average daily flow of 1.0 m3/day per ERU for sewage flows. Note On The Rated Capacity Of Treatment Plants The Ministry of the Environment expresses the rated capacity of a water treatment plant in terms of the maximum daily flow that it can produce. The Ministry expresses the rated capacity of a sewage treatment plant in terms of the average daily flow that it can receive. Flow Records Water Treatment Plant Sewage Treatment Plant Record Flow (m3/day) Flow (m3/day) Year Average Maximum Average 2006 418 771-2007 478 1,076 65 2008 441 840 117 Average 446 896 A 91 B Calculation of Water Consumption Per ERU a) Consumption for an average day = 260 Lpcd C b) Allowance for system losses = 15% D c) Peaking factor - average day to = 2.25 E maximum day - based on MOE Guidelines for facility capacity - for a water plant serving a population between 2,000 and 3,000 d) ERU occupancy - Ontario census average = 3 persons per unit F and DMM housing report average is approximately 2.8 ppu - assume for a new single detached dwelling
e) ERU water consumption expressed in = 2 m3/d/eru G terms of maximum day demand (=Cx(1+D)xExF/1000) Derivation of Sewage Flows Per ERU a) Portion of properties served by water = 20% H that are also served by sewers. b) Number of water ERUs served by sewers = 90 ERU J (=HxA/G) c) ERU sewage flow expressed in = 1.0 m3/d/eru K terms of average daily flow (=B/J) Calculation of Reserve Water Plant Capacity a) Design capacity per Certificate of Approval = 1,428 m3/d L b) Design capacity in ERUs (=L/G) = 714 ERU M c) Reserve capacity (=L-A) = 532 m3/d N d) Reserve capacity in ERUs (=N/G) = 266 ERU P e) Plant capacity consumed (=A/L) = 63% Q Calculation of Reserve Sewage Plant Capacity a) Design capacity per Certificate of Approval = 691 m3/d R b) Design capacity in ERUs (=R/K) = 691 ERU S c) Reserve capacity (=R-B) = 600 m3/d T d) Reserve capacity in ERUs (=T/K) = 600 ERU U e) Plant capacity consumed (=B/R) = 13% V
APPENDIX B Sewer and Water Capacity Tracking Tables (2008) Township of Georgian Bay (MacTier) Resources The following is a list of resource information used to update the MacTier Water and Sewage Tracking Tables. The MacTier sewage and water flow rate tables, updated for the year of 2008, were provided by the Muskoka Engineering and Public Works Department; A property assessment map of the MacTier Urban Area, updated to June, 2009, showing developed properties, vacant properties and the location of existing piped sewage and water services; Correspondence with Township planning staff regarding current zoning on properties; and Muskoka s in-house development application files for zoning by-law amendments, draft and final plans of subdivision/condominium. Methodology: Each individual vacant property shown on the property assessment map for the MacTier Urban Centre was compared with the digital zoning map to determine zone, number and area of vacant lots/lands. Zoning By-law Amendment, Official Plan Amendment and Subdivision files were reviewed and updated under the relevant categories and sub-categories of the tracking tables. Category 1 Calculations: Single detached dwellings (R1, R2, R4, RU): The total number of ERU s for vacant Residential (R1, R4, RU) zoned lots are calculated using a general allowance of 1 ERU per lot: R1/R4/RU = total # vacant lots x 1 ERU Multiple Residential (RM1, RM2, RM3, RM4): There are no vacant multiple residential properties in MacTier: Institutional Lands (I, I-3): The total number of ERU s for Institutional (I) lots has been calculated with a general allowance of 5 ERU s per acre: I = Total acreage of vacant Institutional land x 5 ERU s per acre Commercial lands (C1, C2, C3, CT-1, CT-2, CM1, CM2, CM3, CM4): The total number of ERU s for Commercial (C2) lots has been calculated using a general allowance of 5 ERU s per acre:
C2 = Total acreage of vacant commercial land x 5 ERU s. Industrial Lands (M, MX): There are no vacant industrial properties in MacTier. Category 2 and 3: Categories 2 and 3 consist of the following: Category 2 i. Draft approved plans of Subdivision/Condominium requiring an agreement and with no allocation. Ii. Zoned properties with Holding or requiring an agreement and with no allocation. iii. Proposals under appeal. iv. Special projects. Category 3.i. ii. iii. iv. Development applications. Plans of Subdivision/Condominium in circulation. O.P.A. applications or O.P.A. with further required agreement, but with capacity expansion. Development requiring capacity expansion.
MACTIER CAPACITY TRACKING - 2008 SUMMARY PAGE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT CATEGORY 1 PRESENT CAPACITY 13.17% GENERAL NOTES THREE YEAR AVERAGE (ERU'S) 91 TOTAL PLANT CAPACITY (ERU'S) CURRENT RESERVE ERU's 600 691 IDENTIFICATION DESCRIPTION/COMMENT R/S R/M R/A I C M TOTALS % of CATEGORY LEGEND R1, R4 and RU Vacant Lots Cat. 1 (i): Existing Vacant Lots 70 0 0 0 0 0 70 65.7% R/S = single detached dwellings RM-1 Zones Cat. 1 (i): Vacant lands (none) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% RM-2, RM-3, RM-4 Zones Cat. 1 (i): Vacant lands (none) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% R/M = row or town house, semi-detached, duplex, converted dwelling, maisonette R/A = fourplex, apartment unit (Expressed in Equilavent ERU's at 0.6ERU/unit) Commercial Zones Cat. 1 (i): Vacant lands @ 5.0 ERU/acre 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1.4% I = institutional Industrial Zones Cat. 1 (i): Vacant lands (none) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% C = commercial Institutional Zones Cat. 1 (i): Vacant lands @ 5.0 ERU/acre 0 0 0 25 0 0 25 23.5% M = industrial APPROVED DEVELOPMENTS Cat. 1 (ii) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% SUBCATEGORIES Special Projects Cat. 1 (iii) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% i) Identified Existing Lots Local Improvements Cat. 1(iv) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% ii) Site Specific Zoning B/L Amendments iii) Special Projects Sub-Total Category 1 70 0 0 25 2 0 97 iv) Approved Local Improvements SPECIAL COMMUNITY RESERVE 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 9.4% R/S R/M R/A I C M TOTAL 493 TOTALS - CATEGORY 1 80 0 0 25 2 0 107 28.6% TOTAL REMAINING ERU'S CAPACITY WITH ALL CATEGORY 1
MACTIER CAPACITY TRACKING - 2008 SUMMARY PAGE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT CATEGORY 2 & 3 PRESENT CAPACITY 13.17% GENERAL NOTES THREE YEAR AVERAGE (ERU'S) 91 TOTAL PLANT CAPACITY (ERU'S) CURRENT RESERVE ERU's RESERVE ERU'S + CATEGORY ONE 600 691 493 CATEGORY 2 CATEGORY ONE LEGEND IDENTIFICATION DESCRIPTION/COMMENT R/S R/M R/A I C M TOTALS % of CATEGORY 1 Draft Approved Plans 18 0 0 0 0 0 18 100.0% Zoning w/h - Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% R/S = single detached dwellings R/M = row or town house, semi-detached, duplex, converted dwelling, maisonette R/A = fourplex, apartment unit (Expressed in Equilavent ERU's at 0.6ERU/unit) Build-Out Proposals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% I = institutional TOTALS 18 0 0 0 0 0 18 C = commercial M = industrial CATEGORY 3 SUBCATEGORIES i) Identified Existing Lots IDENTIFICATION DESCRIPTION/COMMENT R/S R/M R/A I C M TOTALS ii) Site Specific Zoning B/L Amendments All Proposed Developments TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iii) Special Projects iv) Approved Local Improvements R/S R/M R/A I C M TOTALS 475 REMAINING ERU'S - CATEGORIES 1 & 2 CUMULATIVE TOTALS CATEGORY 1 & 2 98 0 0 25 2 0 125 31% % CAPACITY R/S R/M R/A I C M TOTALS 475 REMAINING ERU'S - ALL CATEGORIES TOTALS - ALL CATEGORIES 98 0 0 25 2 0 125 31% % CAPACITY
MACTIER SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT CATEGORY ONE - COMMITTED DEVELOPMENTS VACANT LANDS WITH NO SPECIFIC DENSITY NOTES TOTAL CAPACITY 691 CUMULATIVE TOTAL RM 1 LANDS (acres) 0 No such vacant lands exists 3 YEAR AVERAGE MAXIMUM ERU'S PER DAY 91 CUMULATIVE TOTAL RM4 LANDS 0 No such vacant lands exists OPERATING CAPACITY & 3 YEAR AVERAGE 13.17% CUMULATIVE TOTAL COMMERCIAL LANDS 0.3087 Estimated based on 5 ERU's per acre AVAILALBLE ERU'S BASED ON 3 YEAR AVERAGE 600 CUMULATIVE TOTAL INDUSTRIAL LANDS 0 No such vacant lands exists CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF AVAILABLE ERU'S - CATEGORY 1 493 CUMULATIVE TOTAL INSTITUTIONAL LANDS 5 Estimated based on 5 ERU's per acre EXISTING VACANT LANDS DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS TYPE INFORMATION SOURCE R/S R/M R/A eru I C M TOT AVAILABLE ERU'S % CAPACITY Vacant R1, R4 and RU lands Cat. 1(i) - Determined from assessment and zoning maps 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 530 23% Vacant RM1 Lands with no specific density (No such vacant lands exist) Cat. 1(i) - Determined from assessment and zoning maps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 530 23% Vacant RM2, RM3, RM4 Lands with no specific density (No such vacant lands exist) Cat. 1(i) - Determined from assessment and zoning maps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 530 23% Vacant Commercial Lands with no specific density (at 5 ERU's/acre) Cat. 1(i) - Determined from assessment and zoning maps 0 0 0 0 0 1.544 0 2 528 24% Vacant Industrial Lands with no specific density (No such vacant lands exis) Cat. 1(i) - Determined from assessment and zoning maps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 528 24% Vacant Institutional Lands with no specific density (at 5 ERU's/acre) Cat. 1(i) - Determined from assessment and zoning maps 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 25 503 27% SERVICING AGREEMENT/DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS SPECIAL COMMUNITY RESERVE 10 ERUs for Special Municipal Projects 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 493 29% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 493 29% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 493 29% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 493 29% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 493 29% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 493 29% LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 493 29% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 493 29% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 493 29% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 493 29% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 493 29% CUMULATIVE TOTALS FOR CATEGORY ONE R/S R/M R/A eru I C M TOT AVAILABLE ERU'S % CAPACITY NOTE: R/A COLUMN INDICATES NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS - eru COLUMN INDICATES ERU EQUILAVENT @ 0.6 ERU / PER UNIT 80 0 0 0 25 1.54 0 106.54 493 28.6%
TOTAL CAPACITY 691 3 YEAR AVERAGE ERU'S PER DAY 91 OPERATING CAPACITY AFTER CATEGORY 1 28.6% AVAILALBLE ERU'S BASED ON 3 YEAR AVERAGE 600 CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF AVAILABLE ERU'S - CATEGORY 1 493 MACTIER SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT CATEGORY TWO - DRAFT APPROVED & OTHER PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS DRAFT APPROVED PLANS SUB/CONDO DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS R/S R/M R/A eru I C M TOT AVAILABLE ERU'S % CAPACITY S2005-6 Stewart Lake, Draft Approved Subdivision R-4-1 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 475 31% BY-LAWS WITH HOLDING & OTHER PROJECTS DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS CUMULATIVE TOTALS FOR CATEGORIES ONE AND TWO R/S R/M R/A eru I C M TOT AVAILABLE ERU'S % CAPACITY NOTE: R/A COLUMN INDICATES NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS - eru COLUMN INDICATES ERU EQUILAVENT @ 0.6 ERU / PER UNIT 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 475 31%
TOTAL CAPACITY 691 3 YEAR AVERAGE ERU'S PER DAY 91 OPERATING CAPACITY AFTER CATEGORY 1 & 2 31.19% AVAILALBLE ERU'S BASED ON 3 YEAR AVERAGE 600 CUMULATIVE TOTAL - CATEGORIES 1 AND 2 475.45646 MACTIER PLANT CATEGORY THREE - PREMILINARY & CONCEPT DEVELOPMENTS FILE/APPLICATION DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS R/S R/M R/A eru I C M TOT AVAILABLE ERU'S % CAPACITY CUMULATIVE TOTALS FOR ALL CATEGORIES R/S R/M R/A eru I C M TOT AVAILABLE ERU'S % CAPACITY NOTE: R/A COLUMN INDICATES NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS - eru COLUMN INDICATES ERU EQUILAVENT @ 0.6 ERU / PER UNIT
MACTIER CAPACITY TRACKING - 2008 SUMMARY PAGE WATER TREATMENT PLANT CATEGORY 1 PRESENT CAPACITY 62.75% GENERAL NOTES THREE YEAR AVERAGE (ERU'S) 448 TOTAL PLANT CAPACITY (ERU'S) CURRENT RESERVE ERU's 266 714 IDENTIFICATION DESCRIPTION/COMMENT R/S R/M R/A I C M TOTALS % of CATEGORY LEGEND R1, R4, RU Vacant Lots Cat. 1 (i): Existing Vacant Lots 70 0 0 0 0 0 70 65.7% R/S = single detached dwellings RM-1 Zone Cat. 1 (i): Vacant lands (none) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% RM-2, RM-3, RM-4 Zones Cat. 1 (i): Vacant lands (none) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% R/M = row or town house, semi-detached, duplex, converted dwelling, maisonette R/A = fourplex, apartment unit (Expressed in Equilavent ERU's at 0.6ERU/unit) Commercial Zones Cat. 1 (i): Vacant lands @ 5.0 ERU/acre 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1.4% I = institutional Industrial Zones Cat. 1 (i): Vacant lands (none) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% C = commercial Institutional Zones Cat. 1 (i): Vacant lands @ 5.0 ERU/acre 0 0 0 25 0 0 25 23.5% M = industrial APPROVED DEVELOPMENTS Cat. 1 (ii) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% SUBCATEGORIES Special Projects Cat. 1 (iii) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% i) Identified Existing Lots Local Improvements Cat. 1(iv) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% ii) Site Specific Zoning B/L Amendments iii) Special Projects Sub-Total Category 1 70 0 0 25 2 0 97 iv) Approved Local Improvements SPECIAL COMMUNITY RESERVE 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 9.4% R/S R/M R/A I C M TOTAL 159 TOTALS - CATEGORY 1 80 0 0 25 2 0 107 77.7% TOTAL REMAINING ERU'S CAPACITY WITH ALL CATEGORY 1
MACTIER CAPACITY TRACKING - 2008 SUMMARY PAGE WATER TREATMENT PLANT CATEGORY 2 & 3 PRESENT CAPACITY 62.75% GENERAL NOTES THREE YEAR AVERAGE (ERU'S) 448 TOTAL PLANT CAPACITY (ERU'S) CURRENT RESERVE ERU's RESERVE ERU'S + CATEGORY ONE 266 714 159 CATEGORY 2 CATEGORY ONE LEGEND IDENTIFICATION DESCRIPTION/COMMENT R/S R/M R/A I C M TOTALS % of CATEGORY 1 Draft Approved Plans 18 0 0 0 0 0 18 100.0% Zoning w/h - Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% R/S = single detached dwellings R/M = row or town house, semi-detached, duplex, converted dwelling, maisonette R/A = fourplex, apartment unit (Expressed in Equilavent ERU's at 0.6ERU/unit) Build-Out Proposals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% I = institutional TOTALS 18 0 0 0 0 0 18 C = commercial M = industrial CATEGORY 3 SUBCATEGORIES i) Identified Existing Lots IDENTIFICATION DESCRIPTION/COMMENT R/S R/M R/A I C M TOTALS ii) Site Specific Zoning B/L Amendments All Proposed Developments TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iii) Special Projects iv) Approved Local Improvements R/S R/M R/A I C M TOTALS 141 REMAINING ERU'S - CATEGORIES 1 & 2 CUMULATIVE TOTALS CATEGORY 1 & 2 98 0 0 25 2 0 125 80% % CAPACITY R/S R/M R/A I C M TOTALS 141 REMAINING ERU'S - ALL CATEGORIES TOTALS - ALL CATEGORIES 98 0 0 25 2 0 125 80% % CAPACITY
MACTIER WATER TREATMENT PLANT CATEGORY ONE VACANT LANDS WITH NO SPECIFIC DENSITY NOTES TOTAL CAPACITY 714 CUMULATIVE TOTAL RM 1 LANDS (acres) 0 No such vacant lands exists 3 YEAR AVERAGE MAXIMUM ERU'S PER DAY 448 CUMULATIVE TOTAL RM2, RM3, RM4 LANDS 0 No such vacant lands exists OPERATING CAPACITY & 3 YEAR AVERAGE 62.75% CUMULATIVE TOTAL COMMERCIAL LANDS 0.3087 Estimated based on 5 ERU's per acre AVAILALBLE ERU'S BASED ON 3 YEAR AVERAGE 266 CUMULATIVE TOTAL INDUSTRIAL LANDS 0 No such vacant lands exists CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF AVAILABLE ERU'S - CATEGORY 1 159 CUMULATIVE TOTAL INSTITUTIONAL LANDS 5 Estimated based on 5 ERU's per acre EXISTING VACANT LANDS DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS TYPE INFORMATION SOURCE R/S R/M R/A eru I C M TOT AVAILABLE ERU'S % CAPACITY Vacant R1, R4 and RU lands Cat. 1(i) - Determined from assessment and zoning maps 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 196 73% Vacant RM1 Lands with no specific density (No such vacant lands exist) Cat. 1(i) - Determined from assessment and zoning maps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 196 73% Vacant RM4 Lands with no specific density (No such vacant lands exist) Cat. 1(i) - Determined from assessment and zoning maps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 196 73% Vacant Commercial Lands with no specific density (at 5 ERU's/acre) Cat. 1(i) - Determined from assessment and zoning maps 0 0 0 0 0 1.544 0 2 194 73% Vacant Industrial Lands with no specific density (No such vacant lands exists) Cat. 1(i) - Determined from assessment and zoning maps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 194 73% Vacant Institutional Lands with no specific density (at 5 ERU's/acre) Cat. 1(i) - Determined from assessment and zoning maps 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 25 169 76% APPROVED ZONING WITH NO HOLDING DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS SPECIAL COMMUNITY RESERVE 10 ERUs for Special Municipal Projects 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 159 78% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 78% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 78% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 78% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 78% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 78% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 78% LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 78% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 78% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 78% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 78% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 78% CUMULATIVE TOTALS FOR CATEGORY ONE R/S R/M R/A eru I C M TOT AVAILABLE ERU'S % CAPACITY NOTE: R/A COLUMN INDICATES NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS - eru COLUMN INDICATES ERU EQUILAVENT @ 0.6 ERU / PER UNIT 80 0 0 0 25 1.54 0 106.54 159 77.7%
MACTIER WATER TREATMENT PLANT CATEGORY TWO - DRAFT APPROVED & OTHER PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS TOTAL CAPACITY 714 3 YEAR AVERAGE ERU'S PER DAY 448 OPERATING CAPACITY AFTER CATEGORY 1 77.7% AVAILALBLE ERU'S BASED ON 3 YEAR AVERAGE 266 CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF AVAILABLE ERU'S - CATEGORY 1 159 DRAFT APPROVED PLANS SUB/CONDO DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS R/S R/M R/A eru I C M TOT AVAILABLE ERU'S % CAPACITY S2005-6 Stewart Lake, Draft Approved Subdivision R-4-1 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 141 80% BY-LAWS WITH HOLDING & OTHER PROJECTS DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS CUMULATIVE TOTALS FOR CATEGORIES ONE AND TWO R/S R/M R/A eru I C M TOT AVAILABLE ERU'S % CAPACITY NOTE: R/A COLUMN INDICATES NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS - eru COLUMN INDICATES ERU EQUILAVENT @ 0.6 ERU / PER UNIT 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 141 80%
MACTIER WATER TREATMENT PLANT CATEGORY THREE - PRELIMINARY PROPOSALS & CONCEPT DEVELOPMENTS TOTAL CAPACITY 714 3 YEAR AVERAGE ERU'S PER DAY 448 OPERATING CAPACITY AFTER CATEGORY 1 & 2 80.19% AVAILALBLE ERU'S BASED ON 3 YEAR AVERAGE 266 CUMULATIVE TOTAL - CATEGORIES 1 AND 2 141.45646 FILE/APPLICATION DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS R/S R/M R/A eru I C M TOT AVAILABLE ERU'S % CAPACITY CUMULATIVE TOTALS FOR ALL CATEGORIES R/S R/M R/A eru I C M TOT AVAILABLE ERU'S % CAPACITY NOTE: R/A COLUMN INDICATES NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS - eru COLUMN INDICATES ERU EQUILAVENT @ 0.6 ERU / PER UNIT