Kabupaten Langkat Suku Bunga Kredit. PDRB harga berlaku

Similar documents
Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran I

LAMPIRAN. Tahun Bulan NPF (Milyar Rupiah)

LAMPIRAN PERHITUNGAN EVIEWS

Appendixes Appendix 1 Data of Dependent Variables and Independent Variables Period

LAMPIRAN LAMPIRAN. = Pengeluaran Konsumsi Masyarakat (milyar rupiah) = Jumlah Uang Beredar (milyar rupiah) = Laju Inflasi (dalam persentase)

Lampiran 1. Tabulasi Data

Lampiran I Data. PDRB (Juta Rupiah) PMA (Juta Rupiah) PMDN (Juta Rupiah) Tahun. Luas Sawit (ha)

DATA VARIABEL PENELITIAN

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 1. 2) descriptive statistics and correlogram. Series: LGCSI Sample 12/31/ /11/2009 Observations 2596

DATA PENELITIAN. Pendapatan Nasional (PDB Perkapita atas Dasar Harga Berlaku) Produksi Bawang Merah Indonesia MB X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 2. 2) graphs. 3) unit root tests

LAMPIRAN. Null Hypothesis: LO has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 1 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=13)

Export and Import Regressions on 2009Q1 preliminary release data Menzie Chinn, 23 June 2009 ( )

Lampiran 1 : Grafik Data HIV Asli

ANALYSIS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN THE EXPENSES OF SOCIAL PROTECTION AND THE ANTICIPATED OLD AGE PENSION

esia/perkembangan/

Lampiran 1 Lampiran 1 Data Keuangan Bank konvensional

The Influence of Leverage and Profitability on Earnings Quality: Jordanian Case

Anexos. Pruebas de estacionariedad. Null Hypothesis: TES has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=9)

Hasil Common Effect Model

LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN. A. Perhitungan Return On Asset

LAMPIRAN 1. Retribusi (ribu Rp)

Estimating Egypt s Potential Output: A Production Function Approach

POLYTECHNIC OF NAMIBIA SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING, ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ECONOMETRICS. Mr.

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1. Wilayah Tahun PAD JOW PDRB JH JR Yogyakarta

BYLAAG: E-VIEWS RESULTATE VAN DIE MODEL VAN VOORRAADINVESTERING IN SUID-AFRIKA

Impact of Direct Taxes on GDP: A Study

Lampiran 1. Data PDB, Pengeluaran Pemerintah, jumlah uang beredar, pajak, dan tingkat suku bunga

Donald Trump's Random Walk Up Wall Street

Financial Econometrics: Problem Set # 3 Solutions

Economics 442 Macroeconomic Policy (Spring 2015) 3/23/2015. Instructor: Prof. Menzie Chinn UW Madison

Financial Risk, Liquidity Risk and their Effect on the Listed Jordanian Islamic Bank's Performance

Econometric Models for the Analysis of Financial Portfolios

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANNEL OF MONETARY POLICY TRANSMISSION MECHANISM IN SRI LANKA

LAMPIRAN. A. Data. PAD (juta) INVESTASI (%) PDRB (juta) Kulon Progo. Bantul. Gunung Kidul. Sleman

CHAPTER 5 MARKET LEVEL INDUSTRY LEVEL AND FIRM LEVEL VOLATILITY

Forecasting the Philippine Stock Exchange Index using Time Series Analysis Box-Jenkins

Methods for A Time Series Approach to Estimating Excess Mortality Rates in Puerto Rico, Post Maria 1 Menzie Chinn 2 August 10, 2018 Procedure:

Photovoltaic deployment: from subsidies to a market-driven growth: A panel econometrics approach

Notes on the Treasury Yield Curve Forecasts. October Kara Naccarelli

SUSTAINABILITY PLANNING POLICY COLLECTING THE REVENUES OF THE TAX ADMINISTRATION

Foreign and Public Investment and Economic Growth: The Case of Romania

Openness and Inflation

Analysis of the Influence of the Annualized Rate of Rentability on the Unit Value of the Net Assets of the Private Administered Pension Fund NN

Appendix. Table A.1 (Part A) The Author(s) 2015 G. Chakrabarti and C. Sen, Green Investing, SpringerBriefs in Finance, DOI /

TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS OF AN EFFICIENT MARKET IN TERMS OF INFORMATION THE CASE OF THE CAPITAL MARKET IN ROMANIA DURING RECESSION

Influence of Macroeconomic Indicators on Mutual Funds Market in India

Relative Effectiveness of Fiscal and Monetary Policies in Nigeria

Trading Volume and Fama-French Three Factor Model on Excess Return. Empirical Evidence from Nairobi Security Exchange

1. A test of the theory is the regression, since no arbitrage implies, Under the null: a = 0, b =1, and the error e or u is unpredictable.

An Examination of Seasonality in Indian Stock Markets With Reference to NSE

BEcon Program, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University Page 1/7

Does it influence? Macro variables on stock returns.

The Relationship Between Internet Marketing, Search Volume, and Product Sales. Honors Research Thesis

The Frequency of Wars*

9. Appendixes. Page 73 of 95

Time Series Analysis of Inflation and RBI Policy Rates

An Analysis of Stock Returns and Exchange Rates: Evidence from IT Industry in India

Okun s Law - an empirical test using Brazilian data

Nexus between stock exchange index and exchange rates

MỘT SỐ KHUYẾT TẬT CỦA MÔ HÌNH HỒI QUY

Santi Chaisrisawatsuk 16 November 2017 Thimpu, Bhutan

Empirical Analysis of Private Investments: The Case of Pakistan

FIN 533. Autocorrelations of CPI Inflation

THE DETERMINANT OF INFLATION IN INDONESIA: PARTIAL ADJUSTMENT MODEL APPROACH

INFLUENCE OF CONTRIBUTION RATE DYNAMICS ON THE PENSION PILLAR II ON THE

LAMPIRAN. Universitas Sumatera Utara

LAMPIRAN. Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob.

Journal of Applied Science and Agriculture

Factors Affecting the Movement of Stock Market: Evidence from India

An Analysis of Macroeconomic Factors Affecting Foreign Exchange Rate

Muhammad Nasir SHARIF 1 Kashif HAMID 2 Muhammad Usman KHURRAM 3 Muhammad ZULFIQAR 4 1

FBBABLLR1CBQ_US Commercial Banks: Assets - Bank Credit - Loans and Leases - Residential Real Estate (Bil, $, SA)

23571 Introductory Econometrics Assignment B (Spring 2017)

The relationship between the exchange rate and employment in Iran

Interactions between United States (VIX) and United Kingdom (VFTSE) Market Volatility: A Time Series Study

An empirical study on the dynamic relationship between crude oil prices and Nigeria stock market

IMPACT OF FOREIGN INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENT FLOWS

A FUNCTION FOR THE ARGENTINE EXPORT DEMAND. Maria Luisa Streb

The Estimation Model for Measuring Performance of Stock Mutual Funds Based on ARCH / GARCH Model

RESEARCH ON INFLUENCING FACTORS OF RURAL CONSUMPTION IN CHINA-TAKE SHANDONG PROVINCE AS AN EXAMPLE.

International Journal of Research and Review E-ISSN: ; P-ISSN:

The Economic Consequences of Dollar Appreciation for US Manufacturing Investment: A Time-Series Analysis

UJI COMMON EFFECT MODEL

MICROFINANCE LENDING TO SHGs AND ITS NEXUS ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN INDIA: AN ARDL ANALYSIS

Monetary Economics Portfolios Risk and Returns Diversification and Risk Factors Gerald P. Dwyer Fall 2015

ARDL Approach for Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Pakistan ( ): An Empirical Study

CHAPTER V RELATION BETWEEN FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH DURING PRE AND POST LIBERALISATION PERIOD

Can the Taylor Rule Describe the Monetary Policy in China?

Determinants of Merchandise Export Performance in Sri Lanka

ملحق رقم( 1 ): الا نحدار للدالة اللوغریثمیة للناتج المحلي الا جمالي

Supplementary Materials for

The Effects of Oil Price Volatility on Some Macroeconomic Variables in Nigeria: Application of Garch and Var Models

The Credit Cycle and the Business Cycle in the Economy of Turkey

Übungsblatt 4. Please examine below OLS estimation results for the log earnings of Egyptian wage workers and answer the below questions:

Appendices. Appendix 1 Buy ranges for each portfolio

THE EFFECTS OF THE MACROECONOMIC DETERMINANTS ON SOVEREIGN CREDIT RATING OF TURKEY

IMPACT OF MACROECONOMIC VARIABLE ON STOCK MARKET RETURN AND ITS VOLATILITY

Transcription:

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian Tahun Konsumsi Masyarakat PDRB harga berlaku Kabupaten Langkat Suku Bunga Kredit Kredit Konsumsi Tabungan Masyarkat Milyar Rp. Milyar Rp. % Milyar Rp. Milyar Rp. 1990 559,61 765,33 14,50 1,51 5,99 1991 604,26 822,66 10,00 1,56 8,06 1992 689,48 980,05 12,00 1,57 5,47 1993 710,01 1.700,66 8,00 2,25 6,98 1994 750,55 1.792,79 10,00 2,73 9,81 1995 820,06 2.096,72 13,20 3,47 19,64 1996 951,25 2.227,88 13,50 4,67 49,88 1997 995,91 2.330,61 17,00 4,93 72,42 1998 987,56 3.862,31 32,00 3,75 105,49 1999 1.005,26 4.077,31 25,50 4,25 198,17 2000 1.157,12 5.106,39 15,50 7,59 398,89 2001 1.284,43 5.606,95 10,25 11,80 289,93 2002 1.870,90 6.001,49 8,19 14,10 301,48 2003 2.080,70 6.625,84 12,97 41,99 226,00 2004 2.092,83 7.361,46 11,42 124,68 468,63 2005 2.751,98 8.463,45 5,88 191,14 430,74 2006 3.717,87 9.885,08 4,33 322,75 578,30 2007 3.727,70 11.455,32 10,49 400,08 721,69 2008 5.688,36 13.243,64 5,56 603,97 566,42 2009 4.997,61 15.568,12 9,53 672,09 567,21 Sumber : BPS dan Bank Indonesia, 1990-2010. 82

Lampiran 2. Pengujian Autocorrelation Function Variabel Konsumsi Level Date: 03/30/11 Time: 13:54 Included observations: 20. ******. ****** 1 0.802 0.802 14.886 0.000. ****.**. 2 0.566-0.215 22.720 0.000. ***. *. 3 0.422 0.125 27.321 0.000. **..**. 4 0.250-0.244 29.036 0.000. *.. *. 5 0.141 0.148 29.619 0.000... *. 6 0.065-0.140 29.752 0.000.... 7-0.035-0.049 29.793 0.000 Variabel Konsumsi First Difference Date: 03/30/11 Time: 13:54 Included observations: 19.**..**. 1-0.328-0.328 2.3826 0.123. **.. *. 2 0.266 0.178 4.0477 0.132. *.. **. 3 0.080 0.244 4.2092 0.240. *... 4-0.083-0.052 4.3907 0.356... *. 5 0.024-0.122 4.4074 0.492. *.. *. 6 0.132 0.158 4.9438 0.551. *... 7-0.127 0.005 5.4814 0.601

Variabel PDRB harga berlaku Level Date: 03/30/11 Time: 13:57 Included observations: 20. ******. ****** 1 0.809 0.809 15.168 0.000. *****.. 2 0.643-0.035 25.271 0.000. ****.. 3 0.490-0.059 31.480 0.000. ***.. 4 0.364-0.020 35.123 0.000. **... 5 0.248-0.058 36.924 0.000. *... 6 0.142-0.059 37.555 0.000... *. 7 0.039-0.080 37.605 0.000 Variabel PDRB harga berlaku First Difference Date: 03/30/11 Time: 13:57 Included observations: 19. **.. **. 1 0.250 0.250 1.3898 0.238. **.. **. 2 0.333 0.289 3.9993 0.135. *... 3 0.158 0.030 4.6207 0.202... *. 4-0.039-0.195 4.6601 0.324. *.. *. 5 0.162 0.174 5.4126 0.368. *.. *. 6-0.113-0.129 5.8048 0.445... *. 7-0.040-0.086 5.8571 0.557

Variabel Kredit Konsumsi Level Date: 03/30/11 Time: 13:59 Included observations: 20. ******. ****** 1 0.763 0.763 13.473 0.000. ****. *. 2 0.503-0.188 19.659 0.000. **... 3 0.317 0.012 22.261 0.000. *.. *. 4 0.142-0.135 22.818 0.000.... 5 0.025 0.006 22.836 0.000... *. 6-0.064-0.078 22.963 0.001. *... 7-0.102 0.032 23.312 0.002 Variabel Kredit Konsumsi First Difference Date: 03/30/11 Time: 13:59 Included observations: 19. ****. **** 1 0.586 0.586 7.6227 0.006. ****. *** 2 0.582 0.364 15.585 0.000. **..**. 3 0.313-0.207 18.027 0.000. **.. *. 4 0.221-0.101 19.324 0.001... *. 5 0.031-0.115 19.350 0.002. *.. *. 6-0.099-0.157 19.648 0.003. *... 7-0.133 0.064 20.239 0.005

Variabel Tabungan Level Date: 03/30/11 Time: 14:02 Included observations: 20. ******. ****** 1 0.835 0.835 16.163 0.000. *****.. 2 0.704 0.020 28.272 0.000. ****.**. 3 0.504-0.293 34.857 0.000. ***.. 4 0.354-0.001 38.298 0.000. **.. *. 5 0.243 0.097 40.033 0.000. *.. *. 6 0.115-0.187 40.451 0.000.... 7 0.051 0.054 40.541 0.000 Variabel Tabungan First Difference Date: 03/30/11 Time: 14:02 Included observations: 19.**..**. 1-0.291-0.291 1.8826 0.170... *. 2 0.005-0.088 1.8831 0.390. *.. *. 3-0.149-0.190 2.4337 0.487. *.. *. 4-0.067-0.195 2.5514 0.635... *. 5-0.047-0.183 2.6154 0.759... *. 6 0.025-0.128 2.6343 0.853. **.. *. 7 0.270 0.209 5.0529 0.654

Variabel Suku Bunga Level Date: 03/30/11 Time: 14:03 Included observations: 20. ****. **** 1 0.622 0.622 8.9602 0.003. **..**. 2 0.232-0.253 10.275 0.006.... 3 0.028 0.007 10.295 0.016. *.. *. 4-0.097-0.110 10.553 0.032. *.. *. 5-0.173-0.075 11.429 0.044.**.. *. 6-0.230-0.119 13.090 0.042.**..**. 7-0.337-0.235 16.933 0.018 Variabel Suku Bunga First Difference Date: 03/30/11 Time: 14:03 Included observations: 19.... 1 0.010 0.010 0.0022 0.963.**..**. 2-0.235-0.235 1.2955 0.523. *.. *. 3-0.127-0.129 1.6977 0.637. *.. *. 4-0.067-0.132 1.8181 0.769... *. 5-0.010-0.083 1.8210 0.873.... 6 0.073 0.004 1.9860 0.921.**. ***. 7-0.302-0.384 5.0120 0.659

Lampiran 3. Pengujian Akar Unit Variabel Konsumsi Level Null Hypothesis: K has a unit root Lag Length: 1 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=4) Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic 2.251024 1.0000 Test critical values: 1% level -4.571559 5% level -3.690814 10% level -3.286909 Variabel Konsumsi First Difference Null Hypothesis: D(K) has a unit root Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=4) Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -8.711043 0.0000 Test critical values: 1% level -4.571559 5% level -3.690814 10% level -3.286909 Variabel PDRB harga berlaku Level Null Hypothesis: PDRB_KHB has a unit root Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=4) Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic 0.716013 0.9991 Test critical values: 1% level -4.532598 5% level -3.673616 10% level -3.277364

Variabel PDRB harga berlaku First Difference Null Hypothesis: D(PDRB_KHB) has a unit root Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=4) Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -4.340122 0.0154 Test critical values: 1% level -4.571559 5% level -3.690814 10% level -3.286909 Variabel Kredit Konsumsi Level Null Hypothesis: KK has a unit root Lag Length: 2 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=4) Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -1.228079 0.8706 Test critical values: 1% level -4.616209 5% level -3.710482 10% level -3.297799 Variabel Kredit Konsumsi First Difference Null Hypothesis: D(KK) has a unit root Lag Length: 2 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=4) Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -1.033534 0.9091 Test critical values: 1% level -4.667883 5% level -3.733200 10% level -3.310349

Variabel Tabungan Level Null Hypothesis: S has a unit root Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=4) Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -3.156105 0.1225 Test critical values: 1% level -4.532598 5% level -3.673616 10% level -3.277364 Variabel Tabungan First Difference Null Hypothesis: D(S) has a unit root Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=4) Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -5.259126 0.0028 Test critical values: 1% level -4.571559 5% level -3.690814 10% level -3.286909 Variabel Suku Bunga Level Null Hypothesis: I has a unit root Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=4) Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -2.014007 0.5572 Test critical values: 1% level -4.532598 5% level -3.673616 10% level -3.277364

Variabel Suku Bunga First Difference Null Hypothesis: D(I) has a unit root Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=4) Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -3.861089 0.0369 Test critical values: 1% level -4.571559 5% level -3.690814 10% level -3.286909

Lampiran 4. Pengujian Kointegrasi Null Hypothesis: ECT has a unit root Exogenous: None Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=0) Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -6.045370 0.0000 Test critical values: 1% level -2.692358 5% level -1.960171 10% level -1.607051

Lampiran 5. Hasil Estimasi dengan Metode OLS Dependent Variable: K Method: Least Squares Date: 05/07/11 Time: 07:47 Included observations: 20 Variable Coefficient Std. Error Prob. C 704.8537 211.6472 3.330324 0.0046 P 0.185933 0.072057 2.580362 0.0209 KK 3.385732 0.927655 3.649775 0.0024 S -0.156917 0.842594-0.186231 0.8548 I -18.04659 11.40200-1.582757 0.1343 R-squared 0.971918 Mean dependent var 1872.173 Adjusted R-squared 0.964429 S.D. dependent var 1530.377 S.E. of regression 288.6320 Akaike info criterion 14.38050 Sum squared resid 1249626. Schwarz criterion 14.62943 Log likelihood -138.8050 Hannan-Quinn criter. 14.42909 F-statistic 129.7869 Durbin-Watson stat 2.473686 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Lampiran 6. Hasil Estimasi dengan Metode ECM Dependent Variable: D(K) Method: Least Squares Date: 05/07/11 Time: 07:54 Sample (adjusted): 1991 2009 Included observations: 19 after adjustments Variable Coefficient Std. Error Prob. C 28.60752 80.43263 0.355671 0.7278 D(P) 0.015283 0.119269 0.128139 0.9000 D(KK) 7.141868 1.227445 5.818483 0.0001 D(S) -0.270351 0.510622-0.529454 0.6054 D(I) -0.455097 9.104893-0.049984 0.9609 ECT(-1) -1.576095 0.302553-5.209310 0.0002 R-squared 0.903318 Mean dependent var 233.5789 Adjusted R-squared 0.866133 S.D. dependent var 533.0905 S.E. of regression 195.0461 Akaike info criterion 13.63644 Sum squared resid 494558.9 Schwarz criterion 13.93468 Log likelihood -123.5462 Hannan-Quinn criter. 13.68691 F-statistic 24.29242 Durbin-Watson stat 1.783957 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000004

Lampiran 7. Pengujian Normalitas 3 2 1 Series: Residuals Sample 1991 2009 Observations 19 Mean 4.64e-14 Median -2.498658 Maximum 265.5773 Minimum -264.2117 Std. Dev. 165.7573 Skewness 0.014331 Kurtosis 1.833610 Jarque-Bera 1.077686 Probability 0.583423 0-300 -200-100 0 100 200 300

Lampiran 8. Pengujian Linieritas Ramsey RESET Test: F-statistic 2.263583 Prob. F(2,11) 0.1502 Log likelihood ratio 6.549221 Prob. Chi-Square(2) 0.0378 Test Equation: Dependent Variable: D(K) Method: Least Squares Date: 05/07/11 Time: 07:55 Sample: 1991 2009 Included observations: 19 Variable Coefficient Std. Error Prob. C 50.14496 74.40789 0.673920 0.5143 D(P) -0.022941 0.125979-0.182100 0.8588 D(KK) 3.430586 2.319523 1.479005 0.1672 D(S) 0.512219 0.625952 0.818303 0.4306 D(I) 2.801873 8.713542 0.321554 0.7538 ECT(-1) -1.256655 0.342785-3.666014 0.0037 FITTED^2 0.000358 0.000571 0.626181 0.5440 FITTED^3 1.95E-10 2.44E-07 0.000796 0.9994 R-squared 0.931507 Mean dependent var 233.5789 Adjusted R-squared 0.887921 S.D. dependent var 533.0905 S.E. of regression 178.4690 Akaike info criterion 13.50227 Sum squared resid 350363.2 Schwarz criterion 13.89993 Log likelihood -120.2716 Hannan-Quinn criter. 13.56957 F-statistic 21.37159 Durbin-Watson stat 1.627387 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000014 98

Lampiran 9. Pengujian Multikolinieritas Model Parsial 1 Dependent Variable: D(P) Method: Least Squares Date: 05/07/11 Time: 07:56 Sample (adjusted): 1991 2009 Included observations: 19 after adjustments Variable Coefficient Std. Error Prob. C 489.1017 124.0878 3.941576 0.0015 D(KK) 7.495016 1.884862 3.976427 0.0014 D(S) -0.513350 1.135962-0.451907 0.6583 D(I) 12.89949 20.10913 0.641474 0.5316 ECT(-1) 1.356367 0.572918 2.367471 0.0329 R-squared 0.675207 Mean dependent var 779.0942 Adjusted R-squared 0.582409 S.D. dependent var 676.3488 S.E. of regression 437.0652 Akaike info criterion 15.21898 Sum squared resid 2674364. Schwarz criterion 15.46751 Log likelihood -139.5803 Hannan-Quinn criter. 15.26104 F-statistic 7.276096 Durbin-Watson stat 2.264887 Prob(F-statistic) 0.002183 Model Parsial 2 Dependent Variable: D(KK) Method: Least Squares Date: 05/07/11 Time: 07:56 Sample (adjusted): 1991 2009 Included observations: 19 after adjustments Variable Coefficient Std. Error Prob. C -18.17555 16.82607-1.080201 0.2983 D(P) 0.070766 0.017796 3.976427 0.0014 D(S) -0.004976 0.111174-0.044760 0.9649 D(I) -1.983416 1.910296-1.038276 0.3167 ECT(-1) -0.062750 0.063707-0.984979 0.3414 R-squared 0.564017 Mean dependent var 35.29368 Adjusted R-squared 0.439450 S.D. dependent var 56.72366 S.E. of regression 42.46893 Akaike info criterion 10.55636 Sum squared resid 25250.54 Schwarz criterion 10.80489 Log likelihood -95.28539 Hannan-Quinn criter. 10.59842 F-statistic 4.527836 Durbin-Watson stat 1.896410 Prob(F-statistic) 0.014816

Model Parsial 3 Dependent Variable: D(S) Method: Least Squares Date: 05/07/11 Time: 07:57 Sample (adjusted): 1991 2009 Included observations: 19 after adjustments Variable Coefficient Std. Error Prob. C 43.55185 40.45761 1.076481 0.2999 D(P) -0.028007 0.061975-0.451907 0.6583 D(KK) -0.028754 0.642403-0.044760 0.9649 D(I) -3.530025 4.671211-0.755698 0.4624 ECT(-1) 0.243439 0.144375 1.686164 0.1139 R-squared 0.186636 Mean dependent var 29.53789 Adjusted R-squared -0.045754 S.D. dependent var 99.82953 S.E. of regression 102.0878 Akaike info criterion 12.31048 Sum squared resid 145906.8 Schwarz criterion 12.55901 Log likelihood -111.9495 Hannan-Quinn criter. 12.35254 F-statistic 0.803115 Durbin-Watson stat 2.430836 Prob(F-statistic) 0.543175

Model Parsil 4 Dependent Variable: D(I) Method: Least Squares Date: 05/07/11 Time: 07:57 Sample (adjusted): 1991 2009 Included observations: 19 after adjustments Variable Coefficient Std. Error Prob. C -0.690007 2.353773-0.293149 0.7737 D(P) 0.002213 0.003451 0.641474 0.5316 D(KK) -0.036047 0.034718-1.038276 0.3167 D(S) -0.011103 0.014692-0.755698 0.4624 ECT(-1) 0.009373 0.008520 1.100110 0.2898 R-squared 0.236354 Mean dependent var -0.261579 Adjusted R-squared 0.018170 S.D. dependent var 5.778035 S.E. of regression 5.725302 Akaike info criterion 6.548602 Sum squared resid 458.9072 Schwarz criterion 6.797139 Log likelihood -57.21172 Hannan-Quinn criter. 6.590664 F-statistic 1.083276 Durbin-Watson stat 1.675968 Prob(F-statistic) 0.401997

Lampiran 10. Pengujian Autokorelasi Breusch-Godfrey Serial Correlation LM Test: F-statistic 0.246264 Prob. F(2,11) 0.7859 Obs*R-squared 0.814272 Prob. Chi-Square(2) 0.6656 Test Equation: Dependent Variable: RESID Method: Least Squares Date: 05/07/11 Time: 07:55 Sample: 1991 2009 Included observations: 19 Presample missing value lagged residuals set to zero. Variable Coefficient Std. Error Prob. C -26.42390 95.00480-0.278132 0.7861 D(P) 0.052201 0.152916 0.341368 0.7393 D(KK) -0.264604 1.464475-0.180682 0.8599 D(S) 0.037344 0.563838 0.066232 0.9484 D(I) -1.851512 11.55834-0.160188 0.8756 ECT(-1) -0.269087 0.501798-0.536246 0.6025 RESID(-1) 0.282120 0.484720 0.582027 0.5723 RESID(-2) -0.305260 0.502315-0.607706 0.5557 R-squared 0.042856 Mean dependent var 4.64E-14 Adjusted R-squared -0.566235 S.D. dependent var 165.7573 S.E. of regression 207.4442 Akaike info criterion 13.80316 Sum squared resid 473363.8 Schwarz criterion 14.20082 Log likelihood -123.1300 Hannan-Quinn criter. 13.87046 F-statistic 0.070361 Durbin-Watson stat 1.805302 Prob(F-statistic) 0.999073 103