Vulnerability of Lents Floodplain Area Residents Study Area Map

Similar documents
Disaster Insurance: Are States and Insurance Companies Prepared?

Many of the changes to the NFIP were recently revised on March 21, 2014 by the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014.

FloodSmart Flood Risk and Flood Insurance. Georgia Floodplain Management March 14, 2013 Beth Cohorst, FloodSmart

Aquidneck Island Resilience Strategy Issue Paper 4. Issue: RESIDENTIAL FLOODING

City of Pensacola and Escambia County Flood Risk and Flood Insurance Study

REAL ESTATE FLOOD DISCLOSURE PROGRAM & FLOOD MAP INFORMATION SERVICES

BRANDI GABBARD CHAIR, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS INSURANCE COMMITTEE COUNCIL MEMBER, CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, FL

Population in the U.S. Floodplains

REAL ESTATE FLOOD DISCLOSURE PROGRAM & FLOOD MAP INFORMATION SERVICES

Office of the Flood Insurance Advocate.

Meeting the Energy Needs of Low-Income Households in Connecticut Final Report

Chapter 10 Equity and Environmental Justice

FEMA FLOOD MAPS Public Works Department Stormwater Management Division March 6, 2018

A Little Less Conversation a Little More ACTION! Louie Greenwell, GISP, CFM T&M Associates Carey Johnson KY Division of Water

Upper Joachim Creek Public Survey on Potential Flood Risk Reduction

In the first three months of 2007, there

Pierce County, Wisconsin. Bridge at Trenton Island. Photo by Rebecca Kihslinger.

Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012

TESTIMONY. Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc.

Truckloads (at 25 tons/truck) of building debris 90

University Drive Flood Risk Management Project Phase I 58 th Ave S to 500 S of 64 th Ave S City of Fargo Project FM-15-C1

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

Gail Moldovan-Trujillo, ACSR,CPIW Hagan Hamilton Insurance 2012 NFIP Agency of the year Flood Insurance Specialist & Consultant

in coordination with Peoria County, Planning and Zoning Department

The National Flood Insurance Program and Flood Insurance Rate Map for San Francisco. Presentation at Treasure Island Community Meeting

Simsbury. Challenges Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 356

REAL ESTATE FLOOD DISCLOSURE PROGRAM & FLOOD MAP INFORMATION SERVICES

Planning Commission April 19, 2017 Erin Cooper, Floodplain Specialist Varda Blum, Floodplain Program Manger

A Floodsmart Future Strategic Flood Risk Management in Brisbane Authors: Ellen Davidge (Brisbane City Council), Greg Rogencamp (Sinclair Knight Merz)

Use of FEMA Non regulatory Flood Risk Products in Planning

CITY OF VESTAVIA HILLS

On March 21, 2014, President Obama signed the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 into law.

Granting Floodplain Development Variances: Things to Consider for Compliance in the NFIP

Flood Management Amendments

Changes to the National Flood Insurance Program: From Biggert to Grimm Waters. Click to edit Master title style. Click to edit Master subtitle style

Changes Coming to the National Flood Insurance Program What to Expect. Impact of changes to the NFIP under Section 205 of the Biggert-Waters Act

9/14/2012. Floodplain Basics the 100 year Flood. Columbus & Bartholomew County Flood Regulation Study Committee. Bartholomew County Floodplains

INFORMED DECISIONS ON CATASTROPHE RISK

The Future of Floodplain Management in Kentucky

Mapping Flood Risk in the Upper Fox River Basin:

Multi-Jurisdictional. Multnomah County. Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. Public Comment DRAFT Nov. 7, 2016

National Capitol Region HAZUS User Group Call

Flood Vulnerability Assessment for Critical Facilities. Molly Woloszyn Lisa Graff, GISP, CFM

Savannah :: Chatham. August rd Edition COMMUNITY INDICATORS DATABASE COUNTY CHATHAM. produced by the Armstrong Public Service Center

Federal Flood Insurance Changes (National Flood Insurance Program NFIP)

In 1993, spring came in like a lion, but refused

Credit Research Center Seminar

Changes in Criteria and Scoring for CRS Outreach Projects

Floodplain Management Plan

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

35 YEARS FLOOD INSURANCE CLAIMS

2018 Alberta Pre-Budget Submission

David A. Stroud, CFM AMEC Earth & Environmental Raleigh, NC

Flooding Part One: BE Informed. Department of Planning & Development

Coalition of New York and New Jersey Flood Insurance Consumer Advocates

The Community Rating System in Coastal New England: Regional Approaches and Lessons Learned

Flood Risk Assessment in the

Flood Insurance vs. Disaster Assistance. Janice Mitchell FEMA, Region

Improving Korea s Disaster Risk Reduction Policy using the Sendai Framework

NFIP Program Basics. KAMM Regional Training

Program Assessment Report 2017

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

Mitigation Strategies

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

LELAND CONSULTING GROUP

G318 Local Mitigation Planning Workshop. Module 2: Risk Assessment. Visual 2.0

Primer on Sea Level Rise and Future Flooding. Doug Marcy / Russell Jackson Coastal Hazards Specialists NOAA Office for Coastal Management

The Changing NFIP, the CRS & Local Governments. Scott Pippin, J.D., M.E.P.D.

Floodplain Management. City Council Work Session April 16, 2013

Overview of Presentation

Kentucky Risk MAP It s not Map Mod II

PUBLIC AWARENESS SURVEY. Prepared by Cocker Fennessy, Inc.

The High Cost of Segregation: Exploring the Relationship Between Racial Segregation and Subprime Lending

City of San Mateo Flood Zone Update. North Shoreview Neighborhood Meeting June 18, 2014

COLLIER COUNTY FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT

Welcome to a Silver Jackets Webinar

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

ANNEX ANNEX. to the. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION. on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States

ANNEX B: TOWN OF BLUE RIVER

2018 FMA Annual Conference in Reno, NV:

CHAPTER THREE Natural Hazard Mitigation Strategy

Flood Insurance THE TOPIC OCTOBER 2012

Flood Mitigation Workgroup. Kickoff Meeting Metro Hall, Room 106 May 11, 2015

Financing Floods in Chicago. Sephra Thomas. GIS for Water Resources C E 394K. Dr. David Maidment

National Flood Insurance Program Making Sense of April 2019 Changes

In Baltimore City today, 20% of households live in poverty, but more than half of the

Factors Influencing Perceptions of Climate and Weather Effects on Property Ownership

Executive Summary. Introduction and Purpose. Scope

Third Appropriation Funding Recommendation

Federal Flood Risk Management Standards. An Update on Federal Flood Resilience Standards

What Was Updated in 2004 in Hennepin Countywide Maps?

Door County Floodplain Program Informational Meeting

Role of Disaster Insurance in Improving Resilience: An Expert Meeting The Resilient America Roundtable

Overview of Capabilities and Current Limitations

A Review of Repetitive Floodloss Data for Hoey s Basin, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana

Mitigation Works. 0 With its devastating combination of water, mud, and sewage, the damages caused by flooding are particularly wrenching.

Identifying Opportunities. Aligning Resources. Community Commitment Plan Summary Report. Measuring Outcomes. Advancing What Works

1.1. PURPOSE 1.2. AUTHORITIES 1. INTRODUCTION

Transcription:

Vulnerability of Lents Floodplain Area Residents Excerpted from study by Belinda Judelman, PSU Institute for Sustainable Solutions Fellow September 30, 2015 The City of Portland s Bureau of Environmental Services and Portland State University teamed up in spring and summer 2015 to assess and better understand the social vulnerability of Lents area residents living in and near Johnson Creek s 100-year floodplain. Social vulnerability is defined as a community s ability to respond to, cope with, recover from, or adapt to environmental hazards. The 100-year floodplain is an area with a 1% or greater chance of flooding in any given year; in these areas, there is at least a 1 in 4 chance of flooding during the life of a 30-year mortgage. Some portions of Johnson Creek s mapped 100-year floodplain experience much more frequent flooding, while other portions have not experienced major flooding since we started keeping records in the 1940 s. Study Area Map 1

Methodology The study compiled U.S. Census (2010) and American Community Survey (2009-2013) data for the four Census tracts that contain the 100-year Lents Floodplain (see map above). The study area data was then compared to citywide averages and the differences were tested for statistical significance. Based on social vulnerability analysis literature, twenty-six indicators were chosen for this analysis. Those indicators were grouped into the following categories: Household Demographics, Housing Characteristics, Economic Indicators, Education Indicators, Racial & Ethnic Indicators, and Place of Birth & Languages. In tandem, we began interviewing residents to help connect the dots between the statistical indicators, to better understand people s concerns, and to identify issues not captured in the data. Results The four Census tracts were home to a combined 18,746 people at the time of the 2010 survey. 2

3

4

Interviews Four residents were asked a series of questions regarding their thoughts about living in the floodplain, their interactions or relationship with Johnson Creek, if and how their household and/or property has been effected by flooding or the threat of flooding, and what actions they would like to see the City, community leaders, or others take to reduce the burdens of living in the Johnson Creek floodplain. All four interviewees were white homeowners and lived in households with children. Interviewees have been living in their home in the floodplain for seven to ten years and also live in the Lents neighborhood. When asked what they enjoy about living in the Lents neighborhood, interviewees mentioned the location, proximity to public transportation and nature, affordability, ability to have a yard, and good neighbors. All participants mentioned enjoying the benefits of living near Johnson Creek, especially the recently completed Foster Floodplain Natural Area. When asked about the cons of their neighborhood, interviewees mentioned the homeless population, squatters, upkeep of homes, overall appearance, lack of economic attention from the City and quality of amenities that inner Portland neighborhoods have. None of the four interviewees have experienced flooding on their property. When asked what measures (if any) are taken to prevent property damage, interviewees mentioned that raising their homes is cost prohibitive. Instead, most carry flood insurance and follow common sense practices like keeping important documents and materials up on shelves. Three out of the four interviewees didn t know that they would have to pay flood insurance before they signed the final papers when purchasing their homes. One interviewer said that had his household known about the flood insurance before they were signing the papers on their house, they likely would have continued their search for another house outside the floodplain. Interviewees mentioned paying $700-$1,800 per year in flood insurance. Two interviewees stated that their insurance went up by 25% in one year. Only one interviewee was able to take action to reduce his flood insurance payment: he decided to pay off his mortgage to avoid paying flood insurance after he saw his insurance rate double in five years. Living in a floodplain affects community livability and can be a strong emotional drain during the rainy season. One interviewee explained how he checks the weather and rain predictions every day during the winter to make sure he doesn t need to rush home and make sure his basement is flood proof. Interviewees appreciated the work that the City has done to date to mitigate flooding, however most advocated for a way to reduce the burden of flood insurance. Interviewees also requested that the City provide information about which agencies have jurisdiction over which flood-related issues. Interviewees think that more outreach could be done about the elevation survey, and more effort should be taken to ensure that residents have access to the correct FEMA floodplain map. 5