IFRS AT A GLANCE IFRS 9 Financial Instruments

Similar documents
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments

NZ International Financial Reporting Standard 9 (2009) (PBE) Financial Instruments (NZ IFRS 9 (2009) (PBE))

Regular way purchase or sale of financial assets

IASB publishes IFRS 9: Phase 1 of new standard to replace IAS 39

Financial Instruments

11326/16 ADD 1 LM/CDP/vpl DGG 3 B

Indian Accounting Standard (Ind AS) 39. Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement

Exposure Draft. Indian Accounting Standard (Ind AS) 109, Financial Instruments

HKFRS/IFRS 9 and Update on Fin. Instruments 20 October 2010

IFRS 9 Readiness for Credit Unions

IAS 32 & IFRS 9 Financial Instruments

Sri Lanka Accounting Standard SLFRS 9. Financial Instruments

Risk and Accounting. IFRS 9 Financial Instruments. Marco Venuti 2018

Indian Accounting Standard (Ind AS) 109 Financial Instruments

New Zealand Equivalent to International Accounting Standard 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (NZ IAS 39)

LKAS 39 Sri Lanka Accounting Standard LKAS 39

IFRS 9 Classification and Measurement Presentation by: CPA Stephen Obock March 2018

Hong Kong Accounting Standard 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement

Financial Instruments

Get ready for FRS 109: Classifying and measuring financial instruments. July 2018

Classification of financial instruments under IFRS 9

New Zealand Equivalent to International Accounting Standard 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (NZ IAS 39)

NEWS PSAK 71. SEP Effective Date Periods beginning on or after 1 January 2020 (earlier application is permitted)

New Zealand Equivalent to International Financial Reporting Standard 9 Financial Instruments (NZ IFRS 9)

IFRS News. Special Edition on IFRS 9 (2014) IFRS 9 Financial Instruments is now complete

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Disclaimer. HKFRS 9 (2014) Classification and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

PUBLIC BENEFIT ENTITY INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING STANDARD 29 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT (PBE IPSAS 29)


Arab Banking Corporation (B.S.C.)

Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement

First Impressions: IFRS 9 Financial Instruments. International Financial Reporting Standards December 2009

The IFRS for SMEs Topic 2.1 Section 11 Basic Financial Instruments Section 12 Other Fin. Inst. Issues Section 22 Liabilities and Equity

Financial Instruments Standards 11 November Nelson Lam 林智遠 CFA FCCA FCPA(Practising) MBA MSc BBA CPA(US) ACA Nelson 1

IFRS IN PRACTICE IFRS 9 Financial Instruments

Public Benefit Entity International Financial Reporting Standard 9 Financial Instruments (PBE IFRS 9)

IFRS 9 Classification and Measurement

Arab Banking Corporation (B.S.C.)

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments

A closer look Basic/non-basic classification of debt instruments under FRS 102

Financial Instruments. October 2015 Slide 2

IAS 32 & 39 and IFRS 7 Part Two 10 September MBA MSc BBA ACA CFA CPA(Aust) CPA(US) FCCA FCPA(Practising) MSCA Nelson 1

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)

pwc.com/ifrs A practical guide to new IFRSs for 2014

IAS 32, IAS 39, IFRS 4 and IFRS 7 (Part 2) October MBA MSc BBA ACA ACIS CFA CPA(Aust.) CPA(US) FCCA FCPA(Practising) MSCA Nelson 1

IFRS AT A GLANCE IFRS 9 Financial Instruments

IAS 32 & 39 and IFRS 7 Part II 18 August MBA MSc BBA ACA CFA CPA(Aust) CPA(US) FCCA FCPA(Practising) MSCA Nelson 1

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs ) 2004

IPSAS 41, Financial Instruments

Revised Standards on Financial Instruments

INVEST BANK P.S.C. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED 31 MARCH 2018

IAS 39 the sequel. Time for new measures. August Background

IFRS Project Insights Financial Instruments: Classification and Measurement

Financial Instruments

Financial Instruments Standards (Part 2) 18 June 2015

Financial Instruments Ind AS 32 & 109. CA Chirag Doshi March 18, 2017

Accounting for Financial Instruments

CREDIT BANK OF MOSCOW (public joint-stock company)

16/01/2015. FRS 102 & financial instruments basic and other debt instruments. FRS 102 & financial instruments basic and other debt instruments

IFRS News Special Edition

Ihre Ansprechpartner

First Impressions: IFRS 9 Financial Instruments

Topics to be discussed. HKAS 32 & 39 and HKFRS 7 Part II 8 November 2006

Financial Instruments Standards (Part 1) 21 May 2015

Exposure Draft. Accounting Standard (AS) 109. Financial Instruments. Last date for the comments: June 30, 2018

Article. Accounting for Structured Covered Bonds. Accounting for Structured Covered Bonds. Vijaylakshmi Agarwal

The IFRS for SMEs Topic 2.1 Section 11 Basic Financial Instruments Michael Wells

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Amount in millions of Renminbi, unless otherwise stated)

BANK ALJAZIRA (A Saudi Joint Stock Company)

CREDIT BANK OF MOSCOW (public joint-stock company)

AmBank Islamic Berhad (Incorporated in Malaysia)

JSC Microfinance Organization Crystal Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2016

Assiniboine Credit Union Limited Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2018

Understanding IFRS 9 (2014) for Directors By Tan Liong Tong

IFRS pocket guide inform.pwc.com

IFRS for SMEs IFRS Foundation-World Bank

In Depth Retail banking: practical implications of IFRS 9 classification and measurement

BANQUE SAUDI FRANSI Page 6 NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the nine months period ended September 30, 2018 and 20

Notes on the Financial Statements

EUROPEAN UNION ACCOUNTING RULE 11 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Applying IFRS. IFRS 9 for non-financial entities. March 2016

Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement

HKFRSs / IFRSs UPDATE 2011/02

IAS 32, IAS 39 & IFRS 7 AA

Comparison of the FASB s and the IASB s Proposed Models for Financial Instruments (as of May 2010)

MASHREQBANK PSC GROUP. Condensed consolidated interim financial information for the period from 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2018

RIYAD BANK INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

PSAK Pocket guide 2018

Accounting policies. 1. Introduction. 2. Basis of presentation. 3. Consolidation

IFRS 9 The final standard

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

IPSASB 41, Financial Instruments compared to IFRS 9, Financial Instruments

IAS 39 Implementation Guidance Questions and Answers

Converse Bank closed joint stock company

Stanbic IBTC Bank PLC Unaudited interim group financial statements 31 March

DIAMOND BANK PLC CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 31 MARCH 2013

ASPE AT A GLANCE. Section Financial Instruments

CREDIT BANK OF MOSCOW (open joint-stock company) Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2010

Financial Instruments Standards (Part 1) 18 August 2011

What are the common difficulties in studying financial assets and liabilities?

Transcription:

IFRS AT A GLANCE

Page 1 of 5 INITIAL RECOGNITION IFRS 9 replaces the multiple classification and measurement models in IAS 39 for financial assets and liabilities with a single model that has only two classification categories: amortised cost and fair value Page 1 of 5 Classification under IFRS 9 is driven by the entity s business model for managing the financial assets and the contractual characteristics of the financial assets IFRS 9 removes the requirement to separate embedded derivatives from financial asset hosts. It requires a hybrid contract to be classified in its entirety at either amortised cost or fair value. Separation of embedded derivatives has been retained for financial liabilities IFRS 9 is the first phase of a three phase overhaul of IAS 39. Financial assets are recognised on the Statement of Financial Position when the entity becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. BACKGROUND FINANCIAL ASSETS INITIAL MEASUREMENT All financial assets are measured initially at fair value, plus, for those financial assets not classified at fair value through profit or loss, directly attributable transaction costs. Fair value - the amount for which an asset could be exchanged or a liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm s length transaction. Directly attributable transaction costs - incremental costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, issue or disposal of a financial asset or financial liability. SUBSEQUENT CLASSIFICATION An entity shall classify financial assets as subsequently measured at either amortised cost or fair value on the basis of both: The entity s Business Model for managing the financial assets The Contractual Cash Flow Characteristics of the financial asset. Option to designate at fair value An entity may, at initial recognition, designate a financial asset as measured at fair value through profit or loss if doing so eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency (sometimes referred to as an accounting mismatch ) that would otherwise arise from measuring assets or liabilities or recognising the gains and losses on them on different bases. BUSINESS MODEL ASSESSMENT The assessment on the entity s business model centres around whether financial asset are held for the collection of contractual cash flows This is based on how the entity is run, and on the objective of the business model as determined by key management personnel (per IAS 24 Related Party Disclosure) The assessment therefore is not on an instrument by instrument basis rather the overall business model of the entity However, a single entity might have more than one business model, which may then result in different categories of financial assets Although the focus is on the collection of contractual cash flows, it is not necessary to hold all of s to their contractual maturity - this means that sales of assets can occur without prejudicing the assertion that they are held for the collection of contractual cash flows. CONTRACUAL CASH FLOW CHARACTERISTICS The assessment of the contractual terms for cash flows is carried out on an instrument by instrument basis Instruments with cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding, are classified at amortised cost Interest on the principal amount outstanding is made up from consideration for the time value of money and for the credit risk associated with the principal amount outstanding during a particular period and nothing else For instruments denominated in foreign currency, the assessment is made on the basis of the currency in which the instrument is denominated (FX movements between the foreign currency and functional currency are not taken into account when analysing the contractual terms). FAIR VALUE THROUGH OCI For investments in equity instruments within the scope of IFRS 9 that are not held for trading, an entity may make an irrevocable election to present subsequent fair value changes in equity instruments in other comprehensive income (OCI). These changes in fair value are not subsequently recycled to profit and loss. Dividends that are considered as return on investment are recognised in profit or loss. AMORTISED COST Both of the below conditions must be met: The financial asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets in order to collect contractual cash flows The contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding. Measured at: Amortised cost using the effective interest method. FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS Financial assets that do not meet the criteria to be carried at amortised cost are classified as at fair value through profit or loss. Measured at: Fair value with all gains and losses being recognised in profit or loss.

Page 2 of 5 INITIAL RECOGNITION Financial liabilities are recognised on the Statement of Financial Position when the entity becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. FINANCIAL LIABILITIES INITIAL MEASUREMENT All financial liabilities are measured initially at fair value, minus, for those financial liabilities not classified at fair value through profit or loss, directly attributable transaction costs. Fair value - the amount for which an asset could be exchanged or a liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm s length transaction. Directly attributable transaction costs - incremental cost that are directly attributable to the acquisition, issue or disposal of a financial asset or financial liability. SUBSEQUENT CLASSIFICATION AND MEASUREMENT Financial liabilities are classified and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method except for the circumstances below. FAIR VALUE TROUGH PROFIT AND LOSS (FVTPL) Financial liabilities are measured at FVTPL if one of the following applies: The financial liability is held for trading The financial liability is a derivative liability The entity has on initial recognition opted irrevocably to designate and measure it at fair value thorough profit and loss in the following circumstances: An entire hybrid contract (where the embedded derivative does not significantly modify cash flows or where it is clear that in a similar hybrid instrument that separation would be permitted It eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency (sometimes referred to as an accounting mismatch ) that would otherwise arise from measuring assets or liabilities or recognising the gains and losses on them on different bases A group of financial liabilities or financial assets and financial liabilities is managed and its performance is evaluated on a fair value basis, in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy, and according information is provided to the entity s key management personnel: Presentation in the statement of comprehensive income and profit or loss: The amount of fair value change that is attributable to changes in credit risk is presented in other comprehensive income The remaining amount of change in the fair value is presented in profit or loss. TRANSFER OF FINANCIAL ASSETS T QUALIFING FOR DERECOGNITION Financial liabilities from a transfer of a financial asset that does not qualify for derecognition or when the continuing involvement approach applies are measured are accounted for as follows: A financial liability for the consideration received is recognised. Subsequently the net carrying amount of the transferred asset and the associated liability is: The amortised cost of the rights and obligations retained by the entity, if the transferred asset is measured at amortised cost, or Equal to the fair value of the rights and obligations retained by the entity when measured on a stand-alone basis, if the transferred asset is measured at fair value. FINANCIAL GUARANTEE CONTRACTS / COMMITMENTS TO PROVIDE A BELOW-MARKET INTEREST RATE After initial recognition the liability resulting from such contract is measured at the higher of: The amount determined in accordance with IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets The amount initially recognised less, when appropriate, cumulative amortisation recognised in accordance with IAS 18.

Page 3 of 5 BUSINESS MODEL OBJECTIVE TO HOLD FINANCIAL ASSETS TO COLLECT CONTRACTUAL CASH FLOWS The entity s business model does not depend on management s intentions for an individual instrument. Accordingly, this condition is not an instrument-by-instrument approach to classification and should be determined on a higher level of aggregation. However, a single entity may have more than one business model for managing its financial instruments. Therefore, classification need not be determined at the reporting entity level. For example, an entity may have one part of its business that holds a portfolio of investments that it manages in order to collect contractual cash flows and another part of its business that holds a portfolio of investments that it manages in order to realise fair value changes. Although the objective of an entity s business model may be to hold financial assets in order to collect contractual cash flows, the entity need not hold all of those instruments until maturity. An entity s business model can be to hold financial assets to collect contractual cash flows even when sales of financial assets occur. For example, the entity may sell a financial asset if: The financial asset no longer meets the entity s investment policy (e.g. the credit rating of declines below that required by the entity s investment policy) An insurer adjusts its investment portfolio to reflect a change in expected duration (i.e. the expected timing of payouts) An entity needs to fund capital expenditures. However, if more than an infrequent number of sales are made out of a portfolio, the entity needs to assess whether and how such sales are consistent with an objective of collecting contractual cash flows. Example 1 An entity holds investments to collect their contractual cash flows. However the entity would sell an investment in particular circumstances. EXAMPLES: BUSINESS MODEL OBJECTIVE TO HOLD FINANCIAL ASSETS TO COLLECT CONTRACTUAL CASH FLOWS Example 2 An entity s business model is to purchase portfolios of financial assets, such as loans. Those portfolios may or may not include financial assets with incurred credit losses. If payment on the loans is not made on a timely basis, the entity attempts to extract the contractual cash flows through various means for example, by making contact with the debtor by mail, telephone or other methods. In some cases, the entity enters into interest rate swaps to change the interest rate on particular financial assets in a portfolio from a floating interest rate to a fixed interest rate. Example 3 An entity has a business model with the objective of originating loans to customers and subsequently to sell those loans to a securitisation vehicle. The securitisation vehicle issues instruments to investors. The originating entity controls the securitisation vehicle and thus consolidates it. The securitisation vehicle collects the contractual cash flows from the loans and passes them on to its investors. It is assumed for the purposes of this example that the loans continue to be recognised in the consolidated statement of financial position because they are not derecognised by the securitisation vehicle. Although an entity may consider, among other information, the financial assets fair values from a liquidity perspective (i.e. the cash amount that would be realised if the entity needs to sell assets), the entity s objective is to hold the financial assets and collect the contractual cash flows. Some sales would not contradict that objective. The objective of the entity s business model is to hold the financial assets and collect the contractual cash flows. The entity does not purchase the portfolio to make a profit by selling them. The same analysis would apply even if the entity does not expect to receive all of the contractual cash flows (e.g. some of the financial assets have incurred credit losses). Moreover, the fact that the entity has entered into derivatives to modify the cash flows of the portfolio does not in itself change the entity s business model. If the portfolio is not managed on a fair value basis, the objective of the business model could be to hold s to collect the contractual cash flows. The consolidated group originated the loans with the objective of holding them to collect the contractual cash flows. However, the originating entity has an objective of realising cash flows on the loan portfolio by selling the loans to the securitisation vehicle, so for the purposes of its separate financial statements it would not be considered to be managing this portfolio in order to collect the contractual cash flows. EXAMPLES: BUSINESS MODEL OBJECTIVE T TO HOLD FINANCIAL ASSETS TO COLLECT CONTRACTUAL CASH FLOWS Where an entity actively manages a portfolio of assets in order to realise fair value changes arising from changes in credit spreads and yield curves. The entity s objective results in active buying and selling and the entity is managing the instruments to realise fair value gains rather than to collect the contractual cash flows. A portfolio of financial assets that is managed and whose performance is evaluated on a fair value basis. Also, a portfolio of financial assets that meets the definition of held for trading is not held to collect contractual cash flows.

Page 4 of 5 CONTRACTUAL CASH FLOWS THAT ARE SOLELY PAYMENT OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST (ON THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING) To determine whether a financial asset should subsequently be classified at amortised cost, contractual cash flows (CCF s) must be solely payments of principal and interest (SPPI) on the principal amount outstanding. Leverage is a contractual cash flow characteristic of some financial assets. It increases the variability of the contractual cash flow s with the result that they do not have the economic characteristics of interest. Stand-alone option, forward and swap contracts are examples of financial assets that include leverage. Such contracts cannot be measured at amortised cost. Contractual provisions that permit the issuer (i.e. the debtor) to prepay a debt instrument (e.g. a loan or a bond) or permit the holder (i.e. the creditor) to put a debt instrument back to the issuer before maturity. Such provisions will only result in contractual cash flow s that are SPPI on the principal amount outstanding if: The provision is not contingent on future events, other than to protect: The holder against the credit deterioration of the issuer (e.g. defaults, credit downgrades or loan covenant violations), or a change in control of the issuer; or The holder or issuer against changes in relevant taxation or law; and The prepayment amount substantially represents unpaid amounts of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding, which may include reasonable additional compensation for the early termination of the contract. Contractual provisions that permit the issuer or holder to extend the contractual term of a debt instrument (i.e. an extension option) can result in contractual cash flows that are SPPI on the principal amount outstanding. Such provisions will only result in contractual cash flow s that are SPPI on the principal amount outstanding if: The provision is not contingent on future events, other than to protect: The holder against the credit deterioration of the issuer (e.g. defaults, credit downgrades or loan covenant violations), or a change in control of the issuer; or The holder or issuer against changes in relevant taxation or law; and The terms of the extension option result in contractual cash flows during the extension period that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding. A contractual term that changes the timing or amount of payments of principal or interest. Such instances do not result in contractual cash flows that are SPPI on the principal amount outstanding unless it: Is a variable interest rate that is consideration for the time value of money and the credit risk (which may be determined at initial recognition only, and so may be fixed) associated with the principal amount outstanding; and If the contractual term is a prepayment option, meets the conditions in para B4.10; or If the contractual term is an extension option, meets the conditions in para B4.11 (adjacent box). EXAMPLES: CONTRACTUAL CASH FLOWS THAT ARE SOLELY PAYMENTS OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST (ON THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING) Instrument A Instrument A is a bond with a stated maturity date. Payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding are linked to an inflation index of the currency in which the instrument is issued. The inflation link is not leveraged and the principal is protected. Instrument B Instrument B is a variable interest rate instrument with a stated maturity date that permits the borrower to choose the market interest rate on an ongoing basis. For example, at each interest rate reset date, the borrower can choose to pay three-month LIBOR for a three-month term or one-month LIBOR for a onemonth term. Instrument C Instrument C is a bond with a stated maturity date which pays a variable market interest rate. That variable interest rate is capped. Instrument D Instrument D is a full recourse loan and is secured by collateral. Linking payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding to an unleveraged inflation index resets the time value of money to a current level. However, this is T the case if the interest payments were indexed to another variable (i.e. debtor s performance index, equity index etc.). The fact that the LIBOR interest rate is reset during the life of the instrument does not in itself disqualify the instrument. The question is whether the interest paid over the life of the instrument reflects consideration for the time value of money and for the credit risk associated with the instrument. Instrument has in effect a fixed or variable interest rate which are both SPPI as long as they reflect consideration for the time value of money. The collateral does not affect the analysis of the contractual cash flows. EXAMPLES: CONTRACTUAL CASH FLOWS THAT ARE T SOLELY PAYMENTS OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST (ON THE PRINCIAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING) A bond that is convertible into equity instruments of the issuer. The interest rate does not reflect only consideration for the time value of money and the credit risk. The return is also linked to the value of the equity of the issuer. A loan that pays an inverse floating interest rate (i.e. in relation to market interest rates). The interest amounts are not consideration for the time value of money on the principal amount outstanding. A perpetual instrument but the issuer may call the instrument at any point and pay the holder the par amount plus accrued interest at market rates (but payment of interest cannot be made unless the issuer subsequently remains solvent), deferred interest does not accrue additional interest. The issuer may be required to defer interest payments and additional interest does not accrue on those deferred interest amounts. Interest amounts are not consideration for the time value of money.

Page 5 of 5 DERECOGNITION FINANCIAL ASSETS Consolidate all subsidiaries (including special purpose entities (SPEs). Determine whether the derecognition principles below are applied to all or part of. FINANCIAL LIABILITIES A financial liability is derecognised only when extinguished i.e., when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged, cancelled or it expires An exchange between an existing borrower and lender of debt instruments with substantially different terms or substantial modification of the terms of an existing financial liability of part thereof is accounted for as an extinguishment The difference between the carrying amount of a financial liability extinguished or transferred to a 3 rd party and the consideration paid is recognised in profit or loss. Have the rights to the cash flows from the asset expired? Has the entity transferred its rights to receive the cash flows from? Derecognise If an entity transfers a financial asset in a transfer that qualifies for derecognition in its entirety and retains the right to service the financial asset for a fee, it recognises either a servicing asset or liability for that servicing contract If, as a result of a transfer, a financial asset is derecognised, but the entity obtains a new financial asset or assumes a new financial liability or servicing liability, the entity recognises the new financial asset, financial liability or servicing liability at fair value On derecognition of a financial asset, the difference between the carrying amount and the sum of (i) the consideration received and (ii) any cumulative gain or loss that was recognised directly in equity is recognised in profit or loss. Has the entity assumed an obligation to pay the cash flows from that meets the conditions in IFRS 9 paragraph 3.2.5? Has the entity transferred substantially all risks and rewards? Has the entity retained substantially all risks and rewards? Continue to recognise Derecognise Continue to recognise IFRS 9 paragraph 3.2.5 where an entity retains the contractual rights to receive the cash flows of a financial asset, but assumes a contractual obligation to pay those cash flows to one or more entities, three conditions need to be met before an entity can consider the additional derecognition criteria: The entity has no obligation to pay amounts to the eventual recipients unless it collects equivalent amounts from the original asset The entity is prohibited by the terms of the transfer contract from selling or pledging the original asset other than as security to the eventual recipients The entity has an obligation to remit any cash flows it collects on behalf of the eventual recipients without material delay. The entity is not entitled to reinvest the cash flows except for the short period between collection and remittance to the eventual recipients. Any interest earned thereon is remitted to the eventual recipients. Has the entity retained control of? Derecognise Continue to recognise asset to the extent of the entity s continuing involvement.