Negotiating Service Level Agreement Key Terms: Scope of Work, Quality of Service, Customer and Vendor Responsibilities

Similar documents
Drafting Service Level Agreements: Best Practices for Corporate and Technology Counsel

Drafting Complex Cloud Computing Agreements: Negotiation and Risk Mitigation Strategies

Completion Guaranties in Construction Lending: Key Provisions for Lenders and Guarantors

Commercial Lease Negotiations: Property and Liability Insurance, Proof of Coverage, AI and Loss Payee Issues

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Brian E. Hammell, Esq., Sullivan & Worcester, Boston

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Allocating Risk in Real Estate Leases: Contractual Indemnities, Additional Insured Endorsements and Waivers of Subrogation

Survivor Benefit Plans and Military Divorce: Defending Against or Claiming Former-Spouse SBP Coverage

Property Management and Leasing Agreements: Key Provisions for Multi-Family, Office, Retail and Industrial Properties

Best Efforts and Commercially Reasonable Efforts in M&A Agreements: Drafting and Interpretation Challenges

Opinion Letters in Commercial Real Estate Best Practices to Minimize Risk When Crafting Third Party Opinions on Loans and Acquisitions

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Scott D. Brooks, Partner, Cox Castle & Nicholson, San Francisco

ERISA Pre-Approved and Customized Benefit Plans: Overhauled IRS Procedures and Determination Letter Process

Exercising Setoff and Recoupment Rights in Bankruptcy

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

QDRO Drafting Boot Camp: Preparing QDROs for 401(k)s and Similar Defined Contribution Plans

FCPA Due Diligence in M&A Amid Increased Enforcement

IP Agreements: Structuring Indemnification and Limitation of Liability Provisions to Allocate Infringement Risk

Universal Health Services v. Escobar: Avoiding Implied Certification Liability Under FCA

Software Development Agreements: Negotiating and Drafting Key Provisions

Interest Rate Hedges in Real Estate Finance: Placing Swaps, Caps, and Collars on Floating Rate Loans

Clearing Title for Defects Due to Mortgage-Related Issues, Legal Description Errors, and Foreclosure

ERISA Retirement Plan Investment Management Agreements: Guidance for Plan Sponsors to Minimize Risks

Negotiating Reserve Provisions in Real Estate Loan Transactions

UCC Article 9 Blanket Asset Lien Exclusions and Purchase Money Security Interests

M&A Indemnification Deal Terms: 2017 Survey Results

ERISA Compliance and Monitoring 401(k) Investments: Safe Harbor Rules and Appointing Advisers

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Protecting Business Assets From Creditors in Litigation: Strategic Choice of Entities, Avoiding Fraudulent Transfers

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Elizabeth A. Gartland, Esq., Fenwick & West, San Francisco

UCC Article 9 Blanket Asset Lien Exclusions and Purchase Money Security Interests

Creatively Completing The Capital Stack: Real Estate GP Private Equity Funds

Drafting Shareholder Agreements for Private Equity M&A Deals

Allocating Operating Expenses in Commercial Real Estate Leases: Negotiating Strategies for Landlords and Tenants

Construction OCIP/CCIP Insurance Programs: Potential Coverage Gaps and Other Coverage Pitfalls

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

FCPA Due Diligence in M&A: Leveraging the New DOJ Opinion Procedure Release

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Builder's Risk Insurance for Construction Projects: Legal Issues Evaluating Scope of Coverage and Resolving Coverage Disputes

Using Partnership Flips to Finance Renewable Energy Projects: Evaluating Tax Risks, Navigating IRS Safe Harbors

Cash Management Structures, Waterfall Provisions and Reserves in Commercial Real Estate Finance Transactions

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

IP Agreements: Structuring Indemnification and Limitation of Liability Provisions to Allocate Infringement Risk

Investment Adviser Advertising Rule: New SEC Guidance and Best Practices for Compliance

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Insurance Coverage for Statutory and Liquidated Damages and Attorney Fees: Policyholder and Insurer Perspectives

Corporate Governance of Subsidiaries: Board Roles and Responsibilities, Interplay With Parent Board, Liability Risks

Insurance Requirement Provisions in Technology Contracts: Mitigating Risk, Maximizing Coverage

Asset Sale vs. Stock Sale: Tax Considerations, Advanced Drafting and Structuring Techniques for Tax Counsel

Using Partnership Flips to Finance Renewable Energy Projects: Evaluating Tax Risks, Navigating IRS Safe Harbors

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Data Breaches in ERISA Benefit Plans: Prevention and Response

Key Commercial Lease Provisions and SNDAs That Concern Lenders in Mortgage and Leasehold Financing

New Section 199A: Structuring Real Estate Transactions to Take Advantage of the Qualified Business Income Deduction

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Minority Investors in LLCs: Contractual Limitations, Waivers of Fiduciary Duties, Other Key Provisions

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Fraudulent Conveyance Exposure for Intercorporate Guaranties, Integrated Transactions and Designated-Use Loans

Estate Planning and Tax Reform: Wealth Transfer Structures Under the New Tax Law

Distressed Loan Workouts: How Equity Cure Rights Work, Negotiating Loan Restructuring and Forbearance Agreements

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Matthew B. Grunert, Partner, Andrews Kurth Kenyon, Houston

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Presenting a 90-minute encore presentation featuring live Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Using Inverted Leases to Finance Renewable Energy Projects

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Scott J. Bakal, Partner, Neal Gerber & Eisenberg, Chicago Robert C. Stevenson, Attorney, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, Washington, D.C.

Private Investment Funds and Tax Reform

Structuring Leveraged Loans After Tax Reform: Concerns for Multinational Entities

UCC Article 9 Update: Searching and Filing Under New Amendments

for Landlords and Tenants Negotiating Insurance, Indemnity and Mutual Waiver of Subrogation Provisions

Private Equity Real Estate Fund Formation: Capital Raising, Regulatory Issues and Negotiating Trends

Mezzanine Lending: Overcoming Lender Risks to Protect ROI

Impact of Tax Reform on ABLE Accounts and Special Needs Trusts: Guidance for Elder Law Attorneys

ERISA Considerations in Structuring Credit Facilities with Private Investment Funds

Private Equity Waterfall and Carried Interest Provisions: Economic and Tax Implications for Investors and Sponsors

Drafting Asset Purchase Agreements: Reps, Warranties, Covenants, Conditions, Indemnity and Other Key Provisions

M&A Buyer Protection Beyond Indemnification and Escrows

Structuring Commercial Loan Documents to Protect Non-Affiliated Lenders

Structuring Commercial Loan Term Sheets, Proposals and Commitment Letters: Key Terms for Lenders and Borrowers

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Zombie Corporations and CERCLA Liability: Identifying, Reviving and Pursuing Zombie PRPs

Tax Challenges for NPO Counsel: Excess Benefit Transactions for Executive Comp and Other Financial Dealings

30(b)(6) Depositions in Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Litigation Preparing and Responding to Notices of Corporate Representative Depositions

Trucking and Auto Injury Cases: Deposing Accident Reconstruction and Biomechanical Experts

Stephanie Winer Schreiber, Shareholder, Buchanan, Ingersoll & Rooney PC, Pittsburgh

UCC Issues in Mezzanine and Mortgage Loans: Using LLC Equity Interests and Deposit Accounts as Collateral

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

401(k) Plan Nondiscrimination Testing: Guidance for Employee Benefits Counsel

Master Service Agreements for Oil and Gas: Key Provisions, Court Treatment

Structuring Credit Facilities for Private Equity Funds: Subscription, NAV and Hybrid Loans

Fiduciary Compliance in ESOP Transactions: Recent DOL Settlement Agreements

High Volatility Commercial Real Estate Loans: Guidance for Developers and Lenders on HVCRE Rules and Loan Covenants

and Waivers After Default Crafting Forbearance Agreements That Minimize Lender Liability and Bankruptcy Risks

Personal Injury Claims for Uber and Lyft Accidents: Navigating Complex Liability and Insurance Coverage Issues

UCC Article 9 Update on Searching and Filing: Best Practices for Secured Lenders Under the Amended Rules

Financing Multi-Family Housing: Structuring the Low Income House Tax Credit and Tax-Exempt Bonds Documenting Transactions for Investors and Developers

Auto Injury Claim Recovery: Maximizing Pain and Suffering, Loss of Future Earning Capacity Damages

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

SBA Lending: Documenting, Closing and Servicing 7(a) and CDC/504 Loans

Solar Securitization: The Emergence of a New Funding Structure

Transcription:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Negotiating Service Level Agreement Key Terms: Scope of Work, Quality of Service, Customer and Vendor Responsibilities Drafting Provisions that Anticipate and Address System Implementation Problems, Downtime, Data Security, Contract Exit and More WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 21, 2016 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain 10am Pacific Today s faculty features: Michael R. Overly, Partner, Foley & Lardner, Los Angeles Kristie D. Prinz, The Prinz Law Office, Silicon Valley, Calif. The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.

Tips for Optimal Quality FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-961-8499 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.

Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar. A link to the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation will be in the thank you email that you will receive immediately following the program. For additional information about continuing education, call us at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35.

Program Materials FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps: Click on the ^ symbol next to Conference Materials in the middle of the lefthand column on your screen. Click on the tab labeled Handouts that appears, and there you will see a PDF of the slides for today's program. Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.

Negotiating Service Level Agreement Key Terms: Scope of Work, Quality of Service, Customer and Vendor Responsibilities Presenters: Michael R. Overly, Partner Foley & Lardner LLP Los Angeles Kristie D. Prinz, Principal The Prinz Law Office Silicon Valley 5 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Agenda Significance of Service Level Agreements Structuring Service Level Agreements Key Provisions Measuring Tools Reporting Standards Common Issues and Remedies Special Considerations for Cloud Service Level Agreements 6 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Significance of Service Level Agreements When should parties expect a Service Level Agreement? Locally installed vs. Cloud-Based Software Hosting Relationships Addressing Service Level Agreement negotiations in unusual scenarios Purpose of Service Level Agreement Commitment from provider to provide the services to an agreed standard Incentivize provider performance Ensure customer not paying for more than it gets; customer compensated for failures Setting expectations between customer and provider Avoid relationship-ending disputes 7 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Significance of Service Level Agreements Role of Service Level Agreement vs. Reliance on Terms in Provider Agreement Preservation of the relationship; avoidance of dispute Alternative of treating service failures as material breach Difficult to enforce Damages are hard to prove / might be capped by limitation of liability Dispute resolution costs Practical challenges of finding new provider (e.g., pricing challenges, technology or service compatibility issues, data exportation/importation challenges, implementation costs, time loss in conducting due diligence on providers) 8 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Key Provisions in Service Level Agreements Service Availability Uptime guarantee how is it defined? Requires that the services will have an uptime (i.e., availability) of a certain percentage, during certain hours, measured over an agreed upon period. Are there exclusions? (i.e. scheduled downtime; after-hours in particular time zone) Are the exclusions acceptable? Ensure service availability is aligned with customer s expectations and business needs. Considerations: Is the provider the host or is a third party providing the hosting service? If a third party is involved, what is the service availability and uptime guarantee of third party? 9 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Key Provisions in Service Level Agreements Service Availability Sample Service Level Guarantee Clause: Provider will make the Services Available continuously, as measured over the course of each calendar month period, an average of 99.99% of the time, excluding unavailability as a result of Exceptions, as defined below (the Availability Percentage ). Available means the Services shall be available for access and use by Client. For purposes of calculating the Availability Percentage, the following are Exceptions to the service level requirement, and the Services shall not be considered Un-Available, if any inaccessibility is due to: (i) Client s acts or omissions; (ii) Client s Internet connectivity; and (iii) Provider s regularly scheduled downtime (which shall occur weekly, Sundays, from 2 am 4 am central time). 10 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Key Provisions in Service Level Agreements Service Performance Mission critical vs. non-mission critical service Minimum Service Levels and Expected Service Levels Performance Responses: Percentage of performance vs. actual number, for example: 99% of responses within 1 hour No more than 1 miss in each calendar month Performance Response Times: Resolution requirements vs. response goals Key Performance Indicators vs. Critical Service Levels Services that fail to provide timely responses to its users are effectively unavailable Therefore, include a service level that sets forth maximum response times for a customer s use of the services a specific service level target depends on the facts and circumstances in each case (e.g., transaction complexity, processing required, whether services are being accessed over an Internet connection or a leased line) 11 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Key Provisions in Service Level Agreements Service Performance Sample Service Performance Clause The average download time for each page of the Services, including all content contained therein, shall be within the lesser of (a) 0.5 seconds of the weekly Keynote Business 40 Internet Performance Index ( KB40 ) or (b) two (2) seconds. In the event the KB40 is discontinued, a successor index (such as average download times for all other customers of Provider) may be mutually agreed upon by the parties. 12 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Key Provisions in Service Level Agreements Priority Response Time Example: Priority Description Response Time Resolution P1 Critical A P1 support issue is described as critical software platform is inoperable. 1 Business Day Company will assign support staff to triage and resolve the issue and provide updates or workarounds. P2 Urgent A P2 support issue is described as urgent a problem causing an inconvenience, but the customer can still access the software platform. 2 Business Days Company will assign support staff to triage and identify the problem. Company will exercise commercially reasonable efforts to resolve the issue. P3 Non-Urgent A P3 support issue is described as non- urgent an enhancement request or intermittent issue that may require research to resolve. 3 Business Days Company will address request and work to establish a mutually acceptable time frame for resolution. Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to resolve the issue. 13 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Key Provisions in Service Level Agreements Key Performance Indicator ( KPI ) Example: 14 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Key Provisions in Service Level Agreements Critical Service Level ( CSL ) Example: 15 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Key Provisions in Service Level Agreements Continuous Improvement Service levels should reflect improvement in service over time Improvements to meet evolved customer requirements Improvements to reflect provider s ability to provide higher quality of service For example: After first 12 months of service adjust service level to the average of the highest 10 months in the last 12 months Appropriate limits on service level adjustments 16 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Key Provisions in Service Level Agreements Earnback Minimum / expected service level framework Earnback only applies to expected service level No earn back on failure to meet minimum service levels Earn backs should be tied to continuous outperformance of the expected service level Provider s actual performance for a particular service annualized in excess of the expected service level 17 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Key Provisions in Service Level Agreements Service Credit Credit is a remedy applied for service that failed to meet uptime guarantee in a particular service period. Does agreement clearly state that credit is sole remedy? Or can failure still be treated as a material breach? What are consequences of a repeated service failure? Can customer terminate for material breach? Ensure credit can actually be applied in a service failure situation. Frequently credits terms are drafted so poorly that a dispute is likely in any actual service failure situation. Typically, remedies for failure to hit a service level start out as credits towards the next period s service. Sample Service Credit Clause: In the event the Services are not Available 99.99% of the time but are Available at least 95% of the time, then in addition to any other remedies available under this Agreement or applicable law, Client shall be entitled to a credit in the amount of $ each month this service level is not satisfied. In the event the Services are not Available at least 95% of the time, then in addition to any other remedies available under this Agreement or applicable law, Client shall be entitled to a credit in the amount of $ each month this service level is not satisfied. Additionally, in the event the Services are not Available 99.99% for (a) three (3) months consecutively or (b) any three (3) months during a consecutive six (6) month period, then, in addition to all other remedies available to Client, Client shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement upon written notice to Provider with no further liability, expense, or obligation to Provider. 18 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Key Provisions in Service Level Agreements Definitions Definitions should be included wherever needed to explain concept Sample definitions that may be found in Service Level Agreements Scheduled Downtime: downtime due to the performance of routine maintenance to the cloud environment, including but not limited to: (i) upgrades of hardware or software; (ii) daily backups and other daily processing; and (ii) other activities to maintain or improve the service and supporting systems. Service Outage: any period of reported downtime, excluding the following: (A) any downtime that is caused by telecommunications or Internet services; (B) software or hardware controlled by a third party or (c) a force majeure event. Monthly Maximum At Risk Percentage: With respect to each calendar month, 18% of Provider s fees for Services in such month Critical Service Level: Those Service Levels that have performance credits associated with service level failure Key Performance Indicator: Those Service Levels that don t have performance credits associated with service level failure Earnback: The right of provider to earn back performance credits for Critical Service Level failures Performance Credit Allocation Percentage: The total of the percentages (e.g., weights) of all Critical Service levels, which shall not exceed an agreed upon amount (e.g., 250%). 19 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Service Level Agreement Measuring Tools Ensure provider has proper tools and methodologies to actually measure and report on the service levels Must be implemented prior to transition complete (or prior to the start date for the applicable service level) Failure to measure = service level failure Client needs to be able to adopt same tools and methodologies to measure and maintain clear records on service levels, so that Client will be in a position to provide service failure when it occurs. 20 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Service Level Reporting Each service level has a measurement period Reports delivered within a specified period after measurement period (e.g., 10 days) Failure to deliver reports timely = service level failure for the applicable service level Hard copy and/or online Availability of supporting data Quarterly and annual service level reports (in addition to regular reporting requirements) Task force to review service level performance on a regular basis Monthly, quarterly annual meetings Included in governance structure of transaction 21 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Service Level Agreement Standards Groups Working on Standards for Service Level Agreements: Cloud Standards Customer Council: end user advocacy group for cloud adoption; U.S. based SLA-Ready: Group focused on making cloud SLAs readily usable in the private sector European Commission Directorate General for Communications Networks, Content & Technology (DG CONNECT) International Organization for Standardization 22 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Service Level Agreement Standards ISO/IEC 19086:1: SLA Overview and Concepts ISO/IEC 19086:2 SLA Metric Model ISO/IEC 19086-3: SLA Core Conformance Requirements ISO/IEC 19086-4: Security and Privacy of SLA Cloud Service Level Agreement Standardization Guidelines 23 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Common Issues and Remedies Scenario: Provider is using a Service Level Agreement that was copied off the Internet and will not be able to meet the terms offered. Remedy: Inquire with the Provider about any third party host and insist on reviewing the host s Service Level Agreement. Then, include a clause requiring thirty (30) days prior written notice in advance of any change of host. If the Provider is relying on a host with no service level agreement or an inadequate service level agreement to provide the services, this can be identified in advance. Example: Provider shall notify Client at least thirty (30) days prior to implementing any change of third party host and shall be responsible for providing to Client a copy of the service level agreement then in-effect for any replacement host. 24 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Common Issues and Remedies Scenario: Provider says Service Level Agreement is nonnegotiable and Service Level Agreement is unacceptable to Client. Remedy: Assuming Client is unwilling to find a new Provider and Provider is unwilling to enter into a separate addendum to the Service Level Agreement, then Client needs to negotiate the main agreement applicable to the relationship with the understanding that enforcement of the main agreement terms will be Client s only remedy. In particular, Client should draft warranty terms to address any service availability and performance issues, and ensure that a breach of warranty clearly constitutes a material breach of the main agreement contract. 25 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Common Issues and Remedies Scenario: Provider is offering a service credit remedy that is either too complicated to implement in a service failure scenario or simply makes no sense. Remedy: Review the service credit with Provider and suggest a service failure test scenario, where Provider demonstrates how the service credit would be applied in your proposed test scenario. If both Client and Provider determine that the same service credit would be due and payable under the test scenario, then this suggests that the service credit is workable. On the other hand, if Client and Provider determine that a different service credit would be due and payable, this is clear proof that the service credit is going to be ineffective to resolve service failure issues. 26 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Common Issues and Remedies Scenario: Provider is withholding service because of a fee dispute Remedy: Include a provision prohibiting the provider s withholding of services Example: Provided Client continues to timely make all undisputed payments, Provider warrants that during the Term of this Agreement it will not withhold Services provided hereunder, for any reason, including but not limited to a dispute between the parties arising under this Agreement, except as may be specifically authorized herein. 27 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Common Issues and Remedies Scenario: Provider is withholding service because of a fee dispute Alternate Remedy: Include a provision to promptly resolve fee disputes before services withheld. Example: Client shall pay Undisputed Invoices within thirty (30) days after receipt. For the avoidance of doubt, an Undisputed Invoice is an invoice that does not contain duplicate charges, obvious billing errors, or charges that were clearly intended to be charged to a third party. In the event that Client identifies an error with respect to any invoice, Client shall be required to report the error to Provider within fifteen (15) days following receipt of the invoice. If Provider is able to confirm the validity of the invoice in question, Provider shall notify Provider confirming the validity of the charges reflected in the invoice, and Client will be responsible for paying the invoice in question within thirty (30) days following receipt of confirmation from Provider. 28 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Common Issues and Remedies Scenario: Provider is closing its business because of financial difficulties Include a bankruptcy provision provides the client the right to terminate the Agreement in the event of a provider bankruptcy Include a transition assistance services provision requires the provider to assist in transition of the services to a 3rd party provider or to the client, in the event of expiration or termination of the Agreement However, once the provider has declared bankruptcy, Provider s ability to assist the client may be limited 29 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Common Issues and Remedies Scenario: Provider is closing its business because of financial difficulties Include a provision authorizing termination for bankruptcy, insolvency, or in the event a receiver is appointed to hold assets provides the client the right to terminate the Agreement in the event of a provider bankruptcy, insolvency, or in the event of an appointment of a receiver Include a transition assistance services provision requires the provider to assist in transition of the services to a 3rd party provider or to the client, in the event of expiration or termination of the Agreement However, once the provider has declared bankruptcy or become insolvent, Provider s ability to assist the client may be limited. 30 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Common Issues and Remedies Scenario: Provider is closing its business because of financial difficulties Remedy: If the client is not confident of the provider s financial stability, then consider adding a provision that enables the client to identify provider s financial issues in advance Require the provider to deliver periodic reports on its financial condition Example: Quarterly, during the Term, Provider shall provide Client with all information reasonably requested by Client to assess the overall financial strength and viability of Provider and Provider s ability to fully perform its obligations under this Agreement. In the event Client concludes that Provider does not have the financial wherewithal to fully perform as required hereunder, Client may terminate this Agreement without further obligation or liability by providing written notice to Provider. 31 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Common Issues and Remedies Scenario: Provider is closing its business because of financial difficulties Alternate Remedy: Require Provider to identify and appoint an employee to manage the account and ensure that any accompanying agreement has no prohibitions on hiring Provider employees. Then, in the event of a closure of business, hire or contract with the accountable employee directly, thereby ensuring continuation of the services. Example: Provider shall identify, appoint, and maintain in effect at all times an employee who manages Client s account and is responsible for the performance of the services on behalf of Provider (the Designated Employee. Client shall be notified at least thirty (30) days in advance of any personnel change to the Designated Employee. 32 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Common Issues and Remedies Scenario: Provider is acquired by larger company that does not provide the same level of service or intends to phase out service Remedy: Require advance consent prior to any merger or acquisition of all or substantially all of the assets of the company, and then negotiate when consent is sought the services required via separate agreement as a condition of providing the consent. Example: Neither party shall assign its rights or obligations under this Agreement to any third party, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the other party. 33 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Special Service Level Considerations for the Cloud Data Storage/Transmission Does the location of the data match customer s location? If not, local legislation on data storage and transfer may apply. What is the security level of the data? Is the stored data encrypted? Is the data encrypted in transmission? If so, the Service Level Agreement should define the level and specific method of encryption utilized. How is the data being used and/or shared by the provider? Ensure that the data handling complies with the applicable privacy policy. If the customer is not U.S. based, local data privacy requirements may apply. What are the data breach notification procedures? If data breach occurs, what policies and procedures does the provider employ to meet all notification obligations? If the product is health-related, a separate business associate agreement will be required, which may impose more rigorous policies and procedures. What is the data expungement procedure upon expiration/termination of service? 34 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Special Service Level Considerations for the Cloud Data Backup and Disaster Recovery How often are standard backups of the data made? How long are standard backups stored? Where are standard backups stored? Has the provider adopted a comprehensive disaster recovery policy that can be produced upon request for review by customer? Do the policies and procedures in effect meet customer s requirements? (e.g. ensure the recovery of all data and continuation of service in an acceptable time frame after a major disaster; have acceptable arrangements been made such as a third party in an entirely different region of the country) Sample Disaster Recovery Clause: Provider shall maintain and implement disaster recovery and avoidance procedures to ensure that the Services are not interrupted during any disaster. Provider shall provide Client with a copy of its current disaster recovery plan and all updates thereto during the Term. All requirements of this Agreement, including those relating to security, personnel due diligence, and training, shall apply to the Provider disaster recovery site. 35 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Special Service Level Considerations for the Cloud Data Portability & Risk Mitigation How portable is the data from the cloud-based platform? What format is the data portable into? Is that format readable by commercially available third party software products? Can the customer export a complete copy of its own data from the cloud-based platform without assistance by the provider? If provider assistance will be required to transition the data to a new provider, what are the terms of service that the provider is making available to customer? Is the service an add-on cost? How long following any expiration or termination of the service will the transitioning services be extended to customer? 36 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Special Service Level Considerations for the Cloud Data Portability & Risk Mitigation What services are offered to ensure the portability of data? Does provider make available regular back-ups of customer data in a readable format to an off-site, cloud location retrievable by customer? Does provider make available a commercially-available local version of the cloud product, along with regular updates and upgrades, into which the customer data can be imported? Does provider make available source code escrow with a reputable SaaS escrow provider who ensures that tests each backup for viability? 37 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Special Service Level Considerations for the Cloud Service Suspension The Service Level Agreement should carefully define the procedures adopted by provider for involuntary suspension of the service and reinstatement of the service following an involuntary suspension. (e.g. suspension for nonpayment of services). How long after a triggering event will service be suspended? What obligations does provider have to provide notice of an impending suspension? What is the procedure by which a customer may retrieve its data to a portable format during suspension? How long after suspension will the data be expunged? What is the process for reinstating the service after a suspension? 38 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved

Speaker Contact Information: Michael R. Overly, Esq. Foley & Lardner LLP 555 South Flower Street, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, California 90071-2411 (213) 972-4533 moverly@foley.com Kristie D. Prinz, Esq. The Prinz Law Office 2033 Gateway Place, 5 th Floor San Jose, CA 95110 Mailing Address: 117 Bernal Rd., Suite 70-110 San Jose, CA 95119 (408) 884-3577 kprinz@prinzlawoffice.com 39 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP & The Prinz Law Office. All rights reserved