MDG 8: Develop a Global Partnership for Development

Similar documents
MDG 8: Develop a Global Partnership for Development

Goal 8: Develop a Global Partnership for Development

Money, Finance, and Prices

Asia-Pacific Countries with Special Needs Development Report Investing in Infrastructure for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

Asia-Pacific Countries with Special Needs Development Report Investing in infrastructure for an inclusive and sustainable future

INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS

Information on Subscription for the. Fifth General Capital Increase

Agenda 3. The research framework for compiling and analyzing income support scheme

Financing for Development in Asia and the Pacific: Opportunities and Challenges

Session 1 : Economic Integration in Asia: Recent trends Session 2 : Winners and losers in economic integration: Discussion

Doing Business in. Karim Belayachi Co-author, Doing Business Project. Neil Gregory Acting Director, Global Indicators and Analysis WASHINGTON, DC

Financing the MDG Gaps in the Asia-Pacific

Population. G.1. Economic growth. There was an initial dramatic recovery from the crisis in 2010 due to fiscal stimulus and intraregional trade.

Asia-Pacific: Sustainable Development Financing Outreach. Asia-Pacific: Landscape & State of Sustainable Financing

Recycling Regional Savings for Closing Asia-Pacific s Infrastructure Gaps

INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF GOVERNORS. Resolution No. 612

Strengthening public finance in North and Central Asia. An overview

Annual Report on the 2016 Country Performance Assessment Exercise

Asian Noodle Bowl of International Investment Agreements (IIAs)

Health Care Financing in Asia: Key Issues and Challenges

The G20 Mexico Summit 2012 Key Issues for Asia-Pacific

Paying Taxes 2018 Global and Regional Findings: ASIA PACIFIC

INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON STANDARDS OF TRAINING, CERTIFICATION AND WATCHKEEPING FOR SEAFARERS (STCW), 1978, AS AMENDED

Paying Taxes 2019 Global and Regional Findings: ASIA PACIFIC

Table 1 Baseline GDP growth (%)

Household Debt and Business Cycles Worldwide Out-of-sample results based on IMF s new Global Debt Database

INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON STANDARDS OF TRAINING, CERTIFICATION AND WATCHKEEPING FOR SEAFARERS (STCW), 1978, AS AMENDED

regional economic update

Doing Business 2014 Fact Sheet: East Asia and the Pacific

Third Working Meeting of the Technical Advisory Group (TAG) on Population and Social Statistics

Argentina Bahamas Barbados Bermuda Bolivia Brazil British Virgin Islands Canada Cayman Islands Chile

Survey launch in 37 locations

developing Asia Outlook for the major industrial economies HIGHLIGHTS

Chart 1 summarizes the status with respect to assessments as of 30 September 2016 and 30 September 2017.

FDI in Myanmar and Its Outlook. Aung Naing Oo Director General / Secretary MIC

DOMESTIC RESOURCE MOBILIZATION: OPTIONS FOR EXPANDING FISCAL SPACE 3

2 Albania Algeria , Andorra

AID TARGETS SLIPPING OUT OF REACH?

Vizualizing ICT Indicators Tiziana Bonapace, Jorge Martinez-Navarrete United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP)

Asian Development Outlook 2017 Update

FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT TRENDS IN ASIA AND THE PACIFIC

AIIB Strategy Briefing

December Domestic Exports Imports. Volume Tonnes SW. MAT December-14 4, ,192 39, ,

Current Issues in International Tax Policy

East Asia & Pacific. Hulya Ulku Senior Economist Doing Business, DECIG Joanna Nasr Private Sector Dev. Specialist Doing Business, DECIG

Financing for Sustainable Urbanization

MEETING ASIA S INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS HIGHLIGHTS ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK

Doing Business 2015 Fact Sheet: East Asia and the Pacific

Annex Supporting international mobility: calculating salaries

Withholding Tax Rate under DTAA

The 2015 Social Protection Indicator Results for Asia Sri Wening Handayani ADB Principal Social Development Specialist

May Domestic Exports Imports. Volume Tonnes SW. MAT May-14 4, ,960 38, ,

BOARD OF DIRECTORS STRENGTHENING ADB S STRATEGIC FRAMEWORKS

Financial Integration 45. Financial Integration

Targeting aid to reach the poorest people: LDC aid trends and targets

Financing Sustainable Infrastructure In Asia. Fei Yu Deputy Representative Asian Development Bank North American Representative Office

Minutes of Meeting. ADB/OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative for Asia and the Pacific. Participants. Chairs of the Meeting. Summary of the Discussions

SINGAPORE - FINAL LIST OF MFN EXEMPTIONS (For the Second Package of Commitments) Countries to which the measure applies

Double Tax Treaties. Necessity of Declaration on Tax Beneficial Ownership In case of capital gains tax. DTA Country Withholding Tax Rates (%)

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

ASIA-PACIFIC HIGH-LEVEL CONSULTATION ON FINANCING FOR DEVELOPMENT April 2015 Jakarta. Chair s summary

The Role of Fiscal Policy to Achieve Inclusive Growth in Asia

Withholding tax rates 2016 as per Finance Act 2016

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Presentation. Global Financial Crisis and the Asia-Pacific Economies: Lessons Learnt and Challenges Introduction of the Issues

Regional update: trends and issues in Asian development cooperation

Learning Goal. To develop an understanding of the Millennium Development Goal targets

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Income threshold, PPP$ a day $ billion

Albania 10% 10%[Note1] 10% 10% Armenia 10% 10% [Note1] 10% 10% Austria 10% 10% [Note1] 10% 10%

Achievements and Challenges

TRENDS AND MARKERS Signatories to the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime

Adjustment of European Quotas to Enhance the Voice and Participation of Developing and Transition Countries

Infrastructure Financing Challenges in Southeast Asia

Countries with Double Taxation Agreements with the UK rates of withholding tax for the year ended 5 April 2012

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

I am pleased to present to you the current financial situation of the United Nations. I shall focus on four main financial indicators:

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Asian Double Tax Treaties 2011

E/ESCAP/CST(2)/INF/10

2014 September. Trends in donor spending on gender in development. Introduction.

EMBARGOED UNTIL GMT 1 AUGUST

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

March Domestic Exports Imports. Volume Tonnes SW. MAT Mar-16 4, ,322 32, , % Change 3.8% 5.2% 13.2% 8.0% 1.1% 1.

Non-resident withholding tax rates for treaty countries 1

17-18 October 2017 Phnom Penh, Cambodia CONCEPT NOTE

Building the expert platform for Asian investments. asiafundmanagers.com

Cross-Border Tax Regimes. Steven Sieker Partner, Baker McKenzie 28 June 2018

Key Issues in the Design of Capital Gains Tax Regimes: Taxing Non- Residents. 18 July 2014

Senior Leadership Programme (SLP) CATA Commonwealth Association of Tax Administrators

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Report on Countries That Are Candidates for Millennium Challenge Account Eligibility in Fiscal

Global Monitoring Report: Findings on Progress since Monterrey

The Concept of Middle Income Countries through a Health Lens

For More Efficient Tax Administration in Asia

Save up to 74% on U.S. postage.

Global Overview of 2012 Pooled Funding

2017 Annual Review of Salary and Benefits for International Staff, National Staff, and Administrative Staff

Transcription:

182 Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2015 MDG 8: Develop a Global Partnership for Development Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 8 has six targets. The first three and last are the focus of this section. The first three targets deal with the provision of official development assistance (ODA), while the last is about the availability of new technologies. 8.A: Develop further an open, rule-based, predictable, nondiscriminatory trading and financial system. 8.B: Address the special needs of the least-developed countries. 8.C: Address the special needs of landlocked developing countries and small island developing states. 8.F: In cooperation with the private sector, make available the benefits of new technologies, especially information and communications. The related tables for the indicators of ICT are presented in Part III of the publication under the theme Transport and Communications Snapshots Net ODA as percentage of gross national income (GNI) exceeded 0.7% for only five OECD Development Assistance Committee countries in 2014 and net ODA to least-developed countries (LDCs) as a proportion of their GNI has declined in most landlocked and small island economies. Access to mobile-cellular phones has risen phenomenally in the Asia and Pacific region, with 3.7 billion mobile subscriptions in 2014 compared with 1.6 million in 1990 and 222 million in 2000. Internet access has also increased significantly in the region, but there are wide gaps across economies with more than one third of the economies in the Asia and Pacific region still having internet access below 20%. Progress Only five Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Development Assistance Committee donor countries exceeded the 0.7% mark of net ODA as percentage of GNI. Figure 8.1 illustrates net ODA as percentage of GNI for 2014 and net ODA to least-developed countries as percentage of GNI for 2013. The UN has suggested that donor countries devote 0.7% of GNI for ODA to the developing world. Only five countries exceeded this mark in 2014: Denmark, Luxembourg, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. While Denmark, Luxembourg, Norway, and Sweden have consistently exceeded 0.7% mark for more than two decades, the United Kingdom s net ODA to GNI reached 0.7% for the first time in 2013. Out of the total ODA, these countries also allocated 0.2% or more to the least-developed countries. All other countries allocation of total ODA was less than 0.7% of their GNI and less than 0.2% of their GNI to the least-developed countries.

Goal 8: Develop a Global Partnership for Development 183 Sweden Luxembourg Norway Denmark United Kingdom The Netherlands Finland Switzerland Belgium Germany Ireland France Australia New Zealand Austria Canada Japan Portugal United States Italy Spain Korea, Rep. of Greece Figure 8.1: Net ODA, 2014 and Net ODA to LDCs, 2013 (as % of OECD/DAC donors GNI) 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 Net ODA to LDCs Net ODA Figure 8.2: Donor Allocation to Basic Social Services, 2013 (percentage of ODA) United States United Kingdom New Zealand Canada Luxembourg Ireland Spain Australia Norway Switzerland Sweden The Netherlands Italy Korea, Rep. of Finland Belgium Germany Denmark France Portugal Japan Austria Greece 0 10 20 30 40 50 ODA = official development assistance. Source: Table 8.2. Millennium Development Goals DAC = Development Assistance Committee, GNI = gross national income, LDCs = least developed countries, ODA = official development assistance, OECD = Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Sources: Table 8.1. Allocation of bilateral ODA to basic social services by most donors was below 20%. Figure 8.2 shows the proportion of ODA from donor economies that has been allocated to basic social services education, primary health care, nutrition, safe water, and sanitation. In 2013, most donor economies (16 out of 23) have allocated less than 20% of bilateral ODA to basic social services. The United States (42%) has led the other donors, viz., Canada (27.3%), Ireland (21.4%), Luxembourg (23.3%), New Zealand (28.0%), Spain (20.7%), and the United Kingdom (29.8%) whose allocation of ODA for basic social services exceeded 20% of total ODA. ODA as a proportion of GNI has been declining since 2000 in most landlocked and small island economies. The Asia and Pacific region includes 12 landlocked developing economies and 13 small island economies. Landlocked economies are often disadvantaged by high transport costs due to lack of direct access to port facilities. Small island economies usually face development challenges due to narrow resource bases, fragile natural environments, lack of economies of scale in production and domestic markets, and high transport costs in international trade. The ODA-to- GNI ratio indicates the importance of ODA relative to the size of the economy. Among the landlocked economies, Afghanistan continued to be the top recipient in terms of ODA as share of GNI. As of 2013, ODA was about a quarter of Afghanistan s GNI, which is a considerable decline from 40% to 50% during 2005 to 2010 (Figure 8.3). For the other landlocked economies receiving ODA, the ODA-to-GNI ratios are all below 10% in 2013, and these ratios have also fallen from their levels in 2000. Compared with landlocked economies, except for Afghanistan, small island economies generally

184 Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2015 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 Figure 8.3: ODA Received in Landlocked Developing Countries as Percentage of their GNIs (%) 80.00 70.00 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 Figure 8.4: ODA Received in Small Island Developing States as Percentage of their GNIs (%) 10.00 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Afghanistan Armenia Azerbaijan Bhutan Kazakhstan Kyrgyz Republic Lao PDR Mongolia Nepal Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan 0.00 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Fiji Kiribati Maldives FSM Palau Papua New Guinea Solomon Islands Timor-Leste Tonga Vanuatu Marshall Islands Samoa Tuvalu GNI = gross national income, Lao PDR = Lao People's Democratic Republic, ODA = official development assistance. Source: Table 8.3. FSM = Federated States of Micronesia, GNI = gross national income, ODA = official development assistance. Source: Table 8.3. have much higher ODA-to-GNI ratios (Figure 8.4). In 2013, ODA-to-GNI ratios are about two-fifths for the Marshall Islands (43.0%), Tuvalu (42.5%), and the Federated States of Micronesia (39.5%), while about a third for Solomon Islands (30.0%) and a quarter for Kiribati (25.5%). Among the 13 island economies, the Maldives (1.2%) and Fiji (2.4%) have the lowest dependence on ODA (Figure 8.4). Phenomenal growth in access to mobile-cellular phones and internet is transforming the lives of the people in developing Asia. Technological innovations and falling prices in growing networks have led to a tremendous expansion of mobile-cellular services and internet access. The mobile technology is transforming the lives of the people and changing the ways in which they interact, communicate, share information, and transact business. Figure 8.5 presents estimated number of mobile-cellular and fixed telephone subscriptions per 100 inhabitants for economies in the Asia and Pacific region. The number of mobile phone subscriptions at 3.7 billion in 2014 was almost 17 times of the subscription base in 2000 while fixed phone subscriptions have started to decline. Twenty-two economies had mobile-cellular phone subscriptions exceeding their population, meaning more than 1 mobile-cellular subscription per person. Figure 8.5 also shows that in Asia and the Pacific, mobile-cellular phone subscriptions have completely out-paced the number of fixed-telephone subscriptions. The three economies with the largest total number of mobile-cellular phone subscriptions in 2014 are also the three most populous economies namely, the People s Republic of China (PRC), with a total subscriptions of 1.3 billion in 2014 (up from 85.3 million in 2000), India with 944 million in 2014 (up from just 3.6 million in 2000), and Indonesia with 319 million (up from 3.7 million in 2000). The per 100 subscription rates in 2014 in these three economies were 92 for the PRC, 74 for India, and

Goal 8: Develop a Global Partnership for Development 185 Figure 8.5: Fixed-Telephone and Mobile-Cellular Subscriptions per 100 Inhabitants, 2014 Hong Kong, China Maldives Kazakhstan Singapore Cambodia Malaysia Viet Nam Thailand Turkmenistan Kyrgyz Republic Australia Indonesia Georgia Japan Armenia Korea, Rep. of New Zealand Philippines Azerbaijan Brunei Darussalam Mongolia Sri Lanka Fiji Tajikistan PRC Palau Nepal Bhutan Bangladesh Afghanistan India Uzbekistan Pakistan Nauru Lao PDR Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu Timor-Leste Cook Islands Samoa Myanmar Papua New Guinea Tuvalu FSM Marshall Islands Kiribati 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Mobile-cellular Fixed-telephone 126 for Indonesia. Cambodia, with a subscription rate of 155 per 100 persons is among the top five along with Hong Kong, China; Kazakhstan; the Maldives; and Singapore. At the bottom of the graph mainly are the Pacific island economies, indicating the constraints in expanding mobile-cellular technology in these island economies. Likewise, the number of internet users has grown rapidly, but the gaps in access rates between the rich and the poor economies are still wide. Figure 8.6 shows the internet access per 100 population with the richer economies at the top of the graph having internet users exceeding 80 per 100 population while poorer countries at the bottom of the graph having access rates below 10 per 100 population. More than one third (17) of the 47 economies in the Asia and Pacific region still have internet access below 20%. Data issues and comparability Data on ODA are collected and verified by the Secretariat of the Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development from its members. Part of the difficulty in monitoring MDG 8 is the lack of quantitative targets in some areas. For the proportion of ODA allocated to basic social services, data are compiled on a project basis according to the most relevant sectors hence basic social services expenditures in other sectors are not captured. Most data on mobile, landline, and internet subscriptions come from questionnaires of the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) that are being sent to participating countries. Other information and reports are sourced from the ministries in-charge of telecommunications and ITU estimates. Millennium Development Goals FSM = Federated States of Micronesia, Lao PDR = Lao People's Democratic Republic, PRC = People's Republic of China. Source: Regional Table 5.9.

186 Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2015 Figure 8.6: Internet Users per 100 Inhabitants, 2014 Japan New Zealand Australia Korea, Rep. of Singapore Hong Kong, China Brunei Darussalam Malaysia Azerbaijan Kazakhstan Nauru PRC Maldives Georgia Viet Nam Cook Islands Armenia Uzbekistan Fiji Tonga Philippines Tuvalu Thailand Bhutan FSM Kyrgyz Republic Mongolia Palau Sri Lanka Samoa Vanuatu India Tajikistan Indonesia Marshall Islands Nepal Lao PDR Pakistan Kiribati Turkmenistan Bangladesh Papua New Guinea Solomon Islands Cambodia Afghanistan Myanmar Timor-Leste 0 20 40 60 80 100 Post 2015 agenda While the MDGs have provided an agenda for partnerships, the post-2015 development agenda is quite ambitious and will require even more challenges to meeting funding needs. Although the significance of ODA for middle-income economies has diminished, the role of ODA will undoubtedly be important for low-income economies in the post-2015 era given their limited capacities to raise public resources domestically. ODA could be catalytic in crowding-in other sources and building capacities. South-South ODA flows are also likely to increase in the coming years. ODA can provide a key role to improve public policies for social inclusion, sustainable development, and lessening the digital divide. Partnerships will have to be harnessed and the sustainable development agenda will have to be financed from more innovative and a diverse range of sources combining public, private, and joint financing that raise funds both internally and externally. FSM = Federated States of Micronesia, Lao PDR = Lao People's Democratic Republic, PRC = People's Republic of China. Source: Regional Table 5.9.

Goal 8: Develop a Global Partnership for Development Goal 8 Targets and Indicators 187 Table 8.1: Target 8.A Develop further an open, rule-based, predictable, non-discriminatory trading and financial system Development Assistance Committee Members Development Assistance Committee Members 8.1 Net ODA Total, as percentage of OECD/DAC donors gross national income 1990 1995 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Australia 0.34 0.34 0.27 0.25 0.30 0.32 0.32 0.29 0.32 0.34 0.36 0.33 0.27 Austria 0.11 0.27 0.23 0.52 0.47 0.50 0.43 0.30 0.32 0.27 0.28 0.27 0.26 Belgium 0.46 0.38 0.36 0.53 0.50 0.43 0.48 0.55 0.64 0.54 0.47 0.45 0.45 Canada 0.44 0.38 0.25 0.34 0.29 0.29 0.33 0.30 0.34 0.32 0.32 0.27 0.24 Denmark 0.94 0.96 1.06 0.81 0.80 0.81 0.82 0.88 0.91 0.85 0.83 0.85 0.85 Finland 0.65 0.31 0.31 0.46 0.40 0.39 0.44 0.54 0.55 0.53 0.53 0.54 0.60 France 0.60 0.55 0.30 0.47 0.47 0.38 0.39 0.47 0.50 0.46 0.45 0.41 0.36 Germany 0.42 0.31 0.27 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.35 0.39 0.39 0.37 0.38 0.41 Greece a.. 0.20 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.21 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.10 0.11 Ireland 0.16 0.29 0.29 0.42 0.54 0.55 0.59 0.54 0.52 0.51 0.47 0.46 0.38 Italy 0.31 0.15 0.13 0.29 0.20 0.19 0.22 0.16 0.15 0.20 0.14 0.17 0.16 Japan 0.31 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.25 0.17 0.19 0.18 0.20 0.18 0.17 0.23 0.19 Korea, Rep. of 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.10 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.13 0.13 Luxembourg 0.21 0.36 0.70 0.79 0.89 0.92 0.97 1.04 1.05 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.07 The Netherlands 0.92 0.81 0.84 0.82 0.81 0.81 0.80 0.82 0.81 0.75 0.71 0.67 0.64 New Zealand 0.23 0.23 0.25 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.30 0.28 0.26 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.27 Norway 1.17 0.86 0.76 0.94 0.89 0.95 0.89 1.06 1.05 0.96 0.93 1.07 0.99 Portugal 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.27 0.23 0.29 0.31 0.28 0.23 0.19 Spain 0.20 0.24 0.22 0.27 0.32 0.37 0.45 0.46 0.43 0.29 0.16 0.18 0.14 Sweden 0.91 0.77 0.80 0.94 1.02 0.93 0.98 1.12 0.97 1.02 0.97 1.01 1.10 Switzerland 0.30 0.33 0.32 0.42 0.38 0.37 0.42 0.44 0.39 0.46 0.47 0.45 0.49 United Kingdom 0.27 0.29 0.32 0.47 0.51 0.36 0.43 0.51 0.57 0.56 0.56 0.70 0.71 United States 0.21 0.10 0.10 0.23 0.18 0.16 0.18 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.19 8.1 Net ODA to the least developed countries, as percentage of OECD/DAC donors gross national income 1990 1995 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Australia 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.09. Austria 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.07 0.06 0.08. Belgium 0.19 0.10 0.11 0.16 0.18 0.17 0.19 0.20 0.31 0.20 0.14 0.16. Canada 0.13 0.08 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.13 0.11 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.10. Denmark 0.37 0.30 0.36 0.32 0.32 0.34 0.32 0.35 0.35 0.32 0.31 0.27. Finland 0.24 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.19 0.20 0.17 0.18 0.19. France 0.19 0.11 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.13 0.10 0.12. Germany 0.12 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.09. Greece a. 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02. Ireland 0.06 0.12 0.15 0.21 0.28 0.28 0.30 0.28 0.29 0.27 0.24 0.23. Italy 0.13 0.04 0.05 0.08 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.04 0.05. Japan 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.14. Korea, Rep. of 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05. Luxembourg 0.08 0.12 0.22 0.28 0.34 0.36 0.38 0.38 0.40 0.36 0.37 0.38. The Netherlands 0.30 0.23 0.22 0.27 0.20 0.24 0.24 0.21 0.24 0.17 0.15 0.17. New Zealand 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.07. Norway 0.51 0.34 0.27 0.35 0.35 0.34 0.33 0.33 0.34 0.31 0.27 0.30. Portugal 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.13 0.15 0.09 0.07. Spain 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.07 0.04 0.03. Sweden 0.35 0.22 0.24 0.31 0.29 0.30 0.32 0.35 0.30 0.35 0.29 0.31. Switzerland 0.13 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.13 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.12. United Kingdom 0.09 0.07 0.11 0.12 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.21 0.19 0.24. United States 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.06.. = data not available at cutoff date, = magnitude equals zero, DAC = Development Assistance Committee, ODA = official development assistance, OECD = Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Millennium Development Goals a Greece is not an ADB member economy. Source: United Nations. Millennium Development Goals Indicators Database. http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd/mdg/data.aspx (accessed 7 July 2015).

188 Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2015 Goal 8 Targets and Indicators Table 8.2: Target 8.B Address the special needs of least developed countries Development Assistance Committee Members 8.2 Proportion of total bilateral, sector-allocable ODA of OECD/DAC donors to basic social services (basic education, primary health care, nutrition, safe water, and sanitation) 1996 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Australia 10.3 21.8 11.1 9.1 9.7 18.5 14.5 14.5 15.6 16.9 16.7 Austria 4.9 3.4 12.8 12.8 9.3 4.7 6.4 3.1 2.7 1.7 1.5 Belgium 16.1 17.9 19.3 21.2 21.2 16.7 13.2 12.5 10.7 16.8 10.1 Canada 6.3 18.3 32.3 30.9 32.0 19.2 30.4 15.3 42.9 27.8 27.3 Denmark 12.6 10.3 11.7 22.9 10.1 12.6 21.3 10.8 11.0 15.0 7.3 Finland 5.8 11.5 9.9 10.3 14.0 11.2 5.9 8.4 8.1 10.1 10.5 France 0.7 3.7 1.9 4.4 6.1 10.3 11.0 7.9 9.3 8.6 5.3 Germany 8.0 11.7 9.2 11.4 10.0 7.7 8.7 6.1 7.4 9.2 7.8 Greece a.. 19.0 20.4 15.1 3.7 11.2 6.6 0.1 Ireland.. 31.4 42.3 35.6 28.7 32.7 23.4 29.2 23.2 21.4 Italy 10.4 13.1 10.6 5.5 12.2 9.1 13.4 12.7 12.5 10.1 12.1 Japan 2.2 8.8 3.6 4.0 4.2 2.7 18.8 7.1 3.2 6.0 3.4 Korea, Rep. of... 18.0 10.7 13.9 6.7 4.6 8.9 8.0 10.9 Luxembourg.. 26.2 32.0 33.9 34.4 36.1 34.9 24.1 21.8 23.3 The Netherlands 14.0 23.6 23.3 38.5 18.9 25.9 11.9 7.7 13.9 17.3 12.3 New Zealand.. 35.8 18.3 32.0 22.8 27.7 16.6 8.8 15.8 28.0 Norway 13.2 10.2 13.6 21.7 21.0 13.6 22.5 11.2 13.5 10.9 14.0 Portugal 11.4 2.5 2.6 5.2 3.4 3.0 3.6 6.7 7.5 7.1 5.0 Spain 6.9 16.1 21.0 13.7 15.5 20.7 24.4 15.1 10.3 15.5 20.7 Sweden 10.3 16.9 15.6 19.7 13.3 11.7 10.8 12.3 14.2 15.8 12.4 Switzerland 5.9 18.8 6.7 5.8 5.6 9.4 9.5 11.1 18.0 15.3 13.6 United Kingdom 28.8 32.4 24.7 35.6 32.8 19.0 21.2 14.3 11.9 23.4 29.8 United States 25.0 18.6 23.5 26.6 33.4 33.2 34.9 34.2 40.5 39.1 42.0. = data not available at cutoff date, = magnitude equals zero, DAC = Development Assistance Committee, ODA = official development assistance, OECD = Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. a Greece is not an ADB member economy. Source: United Nations. Millennium Development Goals Indicators Database. http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd/mdg/data.aspx (accessed 7 July 2015).

Goal 8: Develop a Global Partnership for Development Goal 8 Targets and Indicators 189 Table 8.2: Target 8.B Address the special needs of least developed countries Development Assistance Committee Members 8.3 Proportion of bilateral official development assistance of OECD/DAC donors that is untied a 1990 1995 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Australia 15.8. 77.4 71.9 91.7 98.4 96.7 90.8. 100.0 100.0 99.2 Austria 38.8 25.0 59.2 88.6 89.4 86.4 81.6 55.2 67.7 43.5 37.3 44.2 Belgium.. 85.7 95.7 90.7 92.0 91.9 95.5 93.2 97.3 96.5 97.7 Canada 38.8 40.8 24.9 66.5 63.0 74.6 90.8 98.3 99.2 90.0 91.6 92.9 Denmark. 61.3 80.5 94.5 95.3 95.5 98.5 96.6 93.5 97.3 96.3 96.7 Finland 27.4 75.8 89.5 95.1 86.5 90.7 92.3 90.3 84.3 90.5 95.2 77.6 France 47.1 58.4 68.0 94.7 95.6 92.6 81.9 89.5 96.6 95.7 95.9 90.5 Germany 43.6 60.3 93.2 93.0 93.3 93.4 98.2 97.1 96.0 73.4 79.2 80.1 Greece b.. 23.5 73.6 39.1 42.3 37.9 49.8 62.2 33.0 6.4 2.7 Ireland... 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Italy 16.6 59.8 38.2 92.1 77.0 59.8 78.0 56.2 58.5 66.4 82.0 84.5 Japan 77.0 96.3 86.4 89.7 95.6 95.1 96.5 94.8 93.7 76.2 71.0 80.2 Korea, Rep. of 100.0 1.1 0.8 2.6 1.9 24.7 35.8 48.4 35.7 45.7 49.4 55.1 Luxembourg.. 96.7 99.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 99.0 98.9 94.1 97.0 The Netherlands 51.2 78.9 95.3 96.2 100.0 81.1 93.2 80.8 93.2 94.9 98.4 96.7 New Zealand 100.0.. 92.3 90.2 87.8 92.7 90.1 89.4 82.6 84.0 88.0 Norway 61.3 77.0 97.7 99.6 99.8 99.9 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Portugal. 98.1 98.2 60.7 61.3 43.2 76.4 28.1 32.9.. 99.0 Spain.. 47.2 86.6 82.8 89.1 69.1 76.6 76.2 27.4 24.6 30.0 Sweden 78.5 93.9 85.4 98.3 100.0 100.0 99.9 99.9 100.0 87.7 83.4 85.1 Switzerland 63.0 91.3 93.6 98.0 96.3 97.8 97.3 99.2 74.0 67.3 93.0 94.0 United Kingdom. 86.2 91.5 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 92.8 93.1 94.6 United States 69.5 27.3.. 63.5 68.5 74.7 69.8 69.5 100.0 100.0 100.0. = data not available at cutoff date, DAC = Development Assistance Committee, OECD = Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Millennium Development Goals a Data for 1990-2010 exclude technical cooperation and administrative costs. Data for 2011 2013 exclude administrative costs and in-donor refugee costs. b Greece is not an ADB member economy. Source: For 1990 2010: OECD (2015), Detailed aid statistics: Tying status of bilateral ODA, OECD International Development Statistics Database. http://dx.doi. org/10.1787/data-00080-en. For 2011 2013: OECD (2015), Creditor Reporting System: Aid activities, OECD International Development Statistics Database. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/data-00061-en

190 Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2015 Goal 8 Targets and Indicators Table 8.3: Target 8.C Address the special needs of landlocked developing countries and small island developing states ADB Regional Members 8.4 ODA received in landlocked developing countries and in small island developing states as a proportion of their gross national incomes 1990 1995 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Landlocked Developing Economies Afghanistan... 45.14 41.71 50.28 47.64 49.72 40.17 38.35 32.64 25.22 Armenia 0.13 (1991) 14.84 10.99 3.38 3.27 3.69 2.49 5.97 3.57 3.74 2.58 2.54 Azerbaijan 0.60 (1993) 3.93 2.79 1.87 1.13 0.81 0.54 0.57 0.32 0.47 0.45 0.10 Bhutan 16.36 26.79 12.10 11.15 11.36 7.61 7.06 10.27 8.65 8.09 9.11 7.58 Kazakhstan 0.07 (1993) 0.32 1.11 0.44 0.24 0.23 0.29 0.29 0.17 0.13 0.07 0.05 Kyrgyz Republic 0.91 (1992) 17.51 16.67 11.29 11.15 7.32 7.26 6.96 8.47 9.26 7.32 7.76 Lao PDR 17.22 17.46 16.90 11.31 11.15 9.72 9.55 7.39 6.16 5.15 4.66 3.98 Mongolia 0.52 14.66 19.17 8.88 6.08 5.77 4.53 8.46 5.37 4.46 4.84 3.97 Nepal 11.62 9.73 7.00 5.20 5.78 5.78 5.50 6.54 5.08 4.67 3.97 4.48 Tajikistan 0.62 (1992) 5.50 14.99 11.26 8.84 6.11 5.65 8.32 7.85 5.36 5.20 4.53 Turkmenistan 0.97 (1993) 1.23 1.29 0.40 0.41 0.23 0.10 0.21 0.22 0.16 0.12 0.10 Uzbekistan 0.01 (1992) 0.63 1.37 1.19 0.88 0.73 0.63 0.56 0.57 0.43 0.49 0.50 Small Island Developing Economies Fiji 3.84 2.30 1.70 2.17 1.87 1.53 1.28 2.44 2.44 2.17 2.86 2.36 Kiribati 41.87 16.78 16.35 17.37 16.87 14.88 13.56 15.05 10.77 27.12 25.03 25.48 Maldives 10.76 15.24 3.22 7.89 2.97 2.88 3.40 1.94 6.08 2.95 3.24 1.17 Marshall Islands. 25.44 38.88 31.86 29.88 27.02 27.19 30.52 45.57 39.35 35.52 43.01 Micronesia, Fed. States of 29.28 (1993) 33.04 42.39 41.21 41.46 43.13 35.04 41.09 41.04 41.70 33.51 39.50 Palau 0.01 (1992) 145.12 26.15 12.51 19.37 11.38 21.36 18.56 13.83 13.70 6.79 14.82 Papua New Guinea 13.32 8.47 8.33 5.89 5.66 5.18 3.81 5.24 5.52 5.09 4.45 4.48 Samoa 28.94 22.31 11.32 11.22 11.24 8.27 7.58 16.44 26.70 16.91 18.63 17.76 Singapore -0.01 0.02.......... Solomon Islands 22.02 14.87 15.67 47.77 44.37 51.29 43.64 47.55 66.99 49.14 33.98 30.02 Timor-Leste.. 42.03 22.50 16.46 14.48 8.52 8.44 8.85 5.81 5.69 5.58 Tonga 25.54 18.83 9.85 12.08 7.14 10.01 7.26 12.08 18.88 21.71 16.12 16.88 Tuvalu... 24.60 40.55 24.37 32.74 36.86 26.18 67.20 42.25 42.53 Vanuatu 30.46 21.02 17.68 10.70 11.70 11.37 15.30 17.58 15.95 12.04 13.58 11.41. = data not available at cutoff date, Lao PDR = Lao People s Democratic Republic, ODA = official development assistance. Source: United Nations. Millennium Development Goals Indicators Database. http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd/mdg/data.aspx (accessed 7 July 2015).