School Facilities Financing

Similar documents
Ayla Burchfield. Patty Fountain Tracy Cotterill Ed Husmann Cindy Buoy

2013 WASBO Annual Conference

BOND ISSUE PLANNING. Presentation to: FPS 2030 Committee. Prepared by:

Pierce County School Impact Fee Program Review

Statistical Report of 2016 Assessments for Taxes Payable in 2017

Bonds 101. Michigan Association of School Boards. November 10, PFM Financial Advisors LLC. 555 Briarwood Circle Suite 333

Bonds 101: An Overview of City Financing

Reagan Holliday Edward Jones. This Presentation will be Available May 3rd at

School District of Milton Board of Education

Cory Plager Director, School Financial Services NEWESD Spokane

Repor. Capital. Finance. Pierce Transit Seeks Sales Tax Increase. Background. MVET repeal. Washington Research Council January 28, 2002

Facilities Advisory Committee Wednesday, September 21, 2016, 5:30 p.m. Auxiliary Services Center. Minutes

Financing Alternatives

MUNICIPAL BONDS IN TEXAS and THE BOND SALE PROCESS

UPDATE ON THE MUNICIPAL BOND MARKET: LANDSCAPE, TRENDS & OPPORTUNITIES

Selling Illinois School Bonds Now and in the Future

Bonds 101 Presentation to Corvallis SD No. 509J

September 9, Geneva Community Unit School District 304, Kane County, Illinois. Update on Debt Restructuring Options

Preparing for Bond and Override Elections

Village of Kenilworth

Cory Plager, Financial Services Director NorthEast Washington ESD

11/8/2013. Bonds 101. Presentation Overview. What is a Municipal Bond?

SCHOOL DISTRICT ELECTIONS INFORMATION

MSRB Rule G-17: Interpretive Notice on Duties of Underwriters to Issuers

Texas Association of County Auditors

Market Update Overview of Market Conditions & California Land- Secured Sector Update. February 17, 2017

ROBERT LEWIS SVP / MANAGING DIRECTOR PMA SECURITIES, INC. Center Cass 66. Referendum Overview JANUARY 5, 2017

Dallas Austin Chicago Houston Miami New York San Antonio San Diego

RECOMMENDATION Adopt a Resolution approving the Debt Management and Disclosure Policy.

BONDS 101 AND MARKET UPDATE

Texas Market Update Week of December 10, 2018

School District Property Tax Levies Collections

County School Facilities Sales Tax

KEY CONSIDERATIONS: DEVELOPING A SUCCESSFUL BOND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

SEC Municipal Advisor Rule Overview and Key Elements to Consider for Washington Schools April 25, 2014

East Sandoval County Arroyo Flood Control Authority ( ESCAFCA )

Bond Election is called by the Board of Trustees Bonds are authorized by the voters Bonds are sold

Looking Forward: Private Placements in the Post Credit Crisis World

Help! I need funds to operate!

Topics for Discussion

Public Finance Tools to Fund Infrastructure February 22, 2018

DEBT MANAGEMENT EXAMINATION

Fixed Income Conference March 11, 2014

St. Marys County, Maryland; General Obligation

Strategic and Holistic Plan of Finance Prepared for the City of Petersburg, Virginia

CUSD 200. Financing Options for Refinancing/Restructuring ROBERT E. LEWIS III SVP MANAGING DIRECTOR PMA SECURITIES, INC.

UTILITY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT FINANCING

Financial Impact of Proposed 2018 Bond and Recommended Tax Rate Administrative Recommendation

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

School District of Kewaskum Financial Overview

Fundamentals of a Bond Sale & Current Market Impacts

Stormwater Utility & Water Utility Charges & Rates. October 20, 2015

Texas Market Update Week of January 21, 2019

Troy Bernberg. Vice President, Public Finance April 29, 2016

Private Activity Bonds

ZONE 7 WATER AGENCY POLICY AND PROCEDURE

ICCCFO FALL CONFERENCE. Bond Basics TAMMIE BECKWITH SCHALLMO SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT PMA SECURITIES, INC.

Measure F: Bond Financing 101. Updated September 2016

What is a Municipal Bond? General Session: Basic Structure & Documentation & Financial Aspects of Municipal Bonds. Why Are We Here?

Emerging Debt Regulations and Best Practices

VGFOA/SPIA Debt Management Workshop

Measure D Overview and Bond Issuance Next Steps

Oak Park Village, Illinois; General Obligation

Best Practices for Debt Management

CREDIT RATINGS AND RATING PRESENTATIONS

LOCAL REVENUE SOURCES

Massachusetts Municipal Auditors and Accountants Association Annual Meeting South Yarmouth, Massachusetts June 11, 2018 Peter Frazier, Managing

OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE

I N T R O D U C T I O N T O T A X - E X E M P T B O N D S

Columbia School District, MO

2017 GFOA of South Carolina: Financing Energy Efficiency Projects Creative Financing Approaches

CAD 15 million Callable Zero Coupon Notes due 17 May 2041 Final Terms & Conditions

General Shafter School District STYLE. General Obligation. Government Financial. for Strategies. Presented by Lori Raineri September 3, 2015

Borrowing from a Bank 101

Parker Water & Sanitation District, Colorado; General Obligation

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aaa rating to the Village of Glenview's (IL) $18.6 million General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2012A

DEBT POLICY SAN JUAN COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT #3 D/B/A/ORCAS ISLAND HEALTH CARE DISTRICT. Section I. Purpose and Overview

The New Era of Tax-Exempt Financing

Central Florida Expressway Authority

City of Los Angeles 2017 General Obligation Bonds Investor Presentation

January 11, Glen Ellyn School District 41, Du Page County, Illinois. Referendum Options

Parks Levy Stakeholder Committee Recommendations to Mercer Island City Council Revised May 9, 2008

1 - Rating Distribution

ICCCFO SPRING CONFERENCE The New Federal Tax Law Its Impact and Debt Strategies Going Forward

Q & A: HOW PROPERTY TAXES ARE DETERMINED

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF REORGANIZATION AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF REORGANIZATION, dated as of July 8, 2016 (this Agreement ), by and between Commencement Ban

SECTOR IN-DEPTH. Sovereign & Supranational South Korea s Sovereign Credit Risk: Calmer Against a Friendlier Backdrop.

MSRB Rule G-17: Interpretive Notice on Duties of Underwriters to Issuers

Texas Market Update Week of July 9, 2018

DEBT POLICY Policy 520

OFFICIAL STATEMENT dated December 16, 2009 BONDS ARE NOT BANK QUALIFIED

Moody s Local Government Ratings PASBO Vanessa Youngs, Analyst, Moody s Investors Service

City of Mercer Island. Section C Budget Summary

Rating Update: Moody's affirms Aa3 on Waukegan Park District, IL's GO debt

Arkansas School Boards Association

Forsyth County Planning and Financing Capital Projects

Bonds 101: General Obligation Bond Basics

Credit Sensitive Fixed Income Market Data

Colorado League of Charter Schools Conference

Town of East Greenwich. Overview of Municipal Bonds

Transcription:

School Facilities Financing October 17, 2017 JON GORES MANAGING DIRECTOR (206) 389-4043 JGORES@DADCO.COM

2 Discussion Topics Capital Facilities Financing Tax Rate Projections

3 Capital Financing Options Types of School District Bonds Voted Unlimited Tax General Obligation Bonds (UTGO) Non-voted Limited General Obligation Bonds (LGO) Voter approved bonds are (UTGO) Repaid with property taxes Approved with a 60% yes vote, 40% validation 5% Debt Capacity = $3,074,698,543* $26,936,770 (Outstanding Debt) = $126,798,157 Non-voted bonds are (LGO) Repaid with existing revenue Can t be used for new construction 3/8 of 1% Debt Capacity = $3,074,698,543 $3,111,770 = $8,418,350 * Preliminary 2018 Bond Assessed Value

4 Capital Financing Options Capital Projects Levy (no debt limit) Simple majority Two to six year collection No interest cost Bonds are the primary method used by Washington School Districts to finance the local share of capital projects because Cash is generated upfront Payments can be spread over time Districts have some control over taxpayer impacts

5 District s Current Debt The District has one outstanding Unlimited Tax General Obligation Bond (UTGO) issue: UTGO Bonds, 2010 All of the District s voter approved UTGO Bonds will be repaid on or before December 1, 2022

6 Historical Bond Tax Rates Over the past 14 years the District s bond tax rate has ranged from $2.23 in 2004 to $1.62 in 2017. Year Historical Bond AV Bond Levy Rate/$1000 2004 1,170,087,965 $2.23 2005 1,318,986,927 $2.05 2006 1,567,966,218 $1.76 2007 1,899,812,179 $1.55 2008 2,457,753,418 $1.25 2009 2,582,882,455 $1.29 2010 2,386,053,542 $1.43 2011 2,614,362,931 $1.64 2012 2,487,266,474 $1.69 2013 2,198,623,263 $1.91 2014 2,344,025,867 $1.79 2015 2,484,972,166 $1.69 2016 2,620,704,588 $1.68 2017 2,898,380,375 $1.62

7 Tax Rate Planning Assumptions for Tax Rate Planning: Interest Rates Bond Rating Assessed Value Bond Structure

8 Tax Rate Planning Interest Rates Lower interest rates result in lower tax rates for bonds. Interest rates are determined when bonds are actually sold. Assumption: Future Bond Sales Current rates plus 1.50% (150 basis points).

9 Tax Rate Planning Bond Rating A higher bond rating results in lower interest rates. Assumption: Aa1 (with State Guarantee) Aa3 District Rating (Pending) A Guide to Bond Ratings Moody s Investors Service Founded 1860 Highest Quality Lowest Quality Aaa Aa1, Aa2, Aa3 A1, A2, A3 Baa1, Baa2, Baa3 NR (Nonrated)

10 Tax Rate Planning Bond Rating (continued) Bond raters consider the local economy, District finances, and other factors Assumption: Aa1 (with State Guarantee) Aa3 District Rating (Pending) Financial Performance Governmental Factors The Rating Economy Debt Factors Debt Factors Economy

11 Tax Rate Planning Assessed Value Year Historical Bond AV New Construction Bond Levy Rate/$1000 % change 2000 $834,370,632 $1.27 N/A 2001 881,669,645 $28,714,390 $1.19 5.7% 2002 959,600,270 31,822,265 $1.11 8.8% 2003 1,056,769,261 36,090,890 $0.95 10.1% 2004 1,170,087,965 48,775,326 $2.23 10.7% 2005 1,318,986,927 57,003,934 $2.05 12.7% 2006 1,567,966,218 82,815,138 $1.76 18.9% 2007 1,899,812,179 121,204,617 $1.55 21.2% 2008 2,457,753,418 174,841,005 $1.25 29.4% 2009 2,582,882,455 75,452,510 $1.29 5.1% 2010 2,386,053,542 62,155,252 $1.43-7.6% 2011 2,614,362,931 29,021,779 $1.64 9.6% 2012 2,487,266,474 32,967,071 $1.69-4.9% 2013 2,198,623,263 26,402,196 $1.91-11.6% 2014 2,344,025,867 32,985,909 $1.79 6.6% 2015 2,484,972,166 42,326,298 $1.69 6.0% 2016 2,620,704,588 33,087,316 $1.68 5.5% 2017 2,898,380,375 51,889,552 $1.62 10.6% 2018* 3,074,698,543 42,309,789 6.1% * Preliminary value 5 year Compound Annual Growth Rate (2013-2018): 6.94% 10 year Compound Annual Growth Rate (2008-2018): 2.26% 11

12 Tax Rate Planning Assessed Value (continued) 4,000,000,000 Historical Assessed Value and Levy Rates for Bonds $4.50 Bond Assessed Value 3,000,000,000 2,000,000,000 1,000,000,000 $3.38 $2.25 $1.13 Bond Levy Rate (per $1,000 AV) 2018* 2017 2016 2015 2014 '- $0.00 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Historical Bond AV 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 Bond Levy Rate/$1000

13 Tax Rate Planning Assessed Value (continued) Projected Assessed Value Growth Final 2017: 10.6% growth Preliminary 2018: 6.1% growth Projected 2019-2020: 3.0% annual growth 2021-2044: 2.0% annual growth An individual s taxes will be based on the assessed value for their property Higher assessed values will lower the District s bond tax rates (but not the overall payment ) New construction vs. increase in value of existing property

14 Tax Rate Planning Bond Structure State law gives Districts great flexibility in determining bond structures Options Level Debt Level Tax Rate Stepped Level Tax Rate

15 Level Debt Results in level annual payments for the life of the bonds Debt Service 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000-2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 $0.55 $0.50 $0.45 $0.40 $0.35 $0.30 $0.25 Tax Rate New Debt Tax Rate

16 Level Tax Rate Attempts to result in a level annual tax rate over the life for the bonds * Debt Service 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000-2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 $0.55 $0.50 $0.45 $0.40 $0.35 $0.30 $0.25 Tax Rate New Debt Tax Rate * Based on assessed value projections.

17 Stepped Level Tax Rate Allows for the issuance of future bonds

Bond Tax Rate Summary 18 Interest Rates: Current rates plus 150 basis points Bond Rating: Aa1 State Guarantee District Rating: Aa3 (Pending) Timber Assessed Value: Constant at 5 Year Average Assessed Value Growth: Final 2017: 10.6% growth; Preliminary 2018: 6.1% annual growth Projected 2019-2020: 3.0% annual growth Projected 2021-2044: 2.0% annual growth Scenario #31 Authorization Amount $76,000,000 Bond Sale Dates and Amounts June 1, 2018 $38,000,000 December 1, 2019 $38,000,000 Total Tax Rates Actual 2017 $5.38 Projected 2018 5.18 2019 4.30 2020 4.30 2023 3.01 2025 3.02 2030 3.01 2035 3.02 Final Maturity 2039 Interest Cost ($000s) $56,554,000 Term 20 Years

19 19

20 20

21 Tax Rate Comparison 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 State School Tax 1.99 2.81 2.81 2.81 2.81 2.81 M&O Levy Rate 3.76 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Enrichment Levy Rate 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Total 5.75 6.47 4.31 4.31 4.31 4.31 Yelm SD - School Tax Rates 7.00 5.25 3.50 Enrichment Levy Rate M&O Levy Rate State School Tax 1.75 0.00 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 *2018 levy rate based on preliminary AV 21

22 Tax Rate Comparison District Assessed Value (2) ($) Bonds ($) M&O ($) Capital ($) Trans. ($) Total ($) Centralia School District No. 401 50,732,819 0.0000 2.7136 0.0000 0.0000 2.7136 Griffin School District No. 324 1,000,864,725 1.4332 2.3353 0.5436 0.0000 4.3121 Tenino School District No. 402 910,514,134 0.0000 3.1968 1.3562 0.0000 4.5529 Rainier School District No. 307 468,692,285 1.2325 3.5347 0.0000 0.0000 4.7672 Rochester School District No. 401 1,005,136,125 1.4284 3.7858 0.0000 0.0000 5.2142 Olympia School District No. 111 8,379,468,129 1.8639 3.0663 0.3266 0.0000 5.2569 Yelm School District No. 2 2,383,116,448 1.6216 3.7612 0.0000 0.0000 5.3828 North Thurston School District No. 3 10,676,320,420 2.1156 3.4700 0.0000 0.0000 5.5856 Tumwater School District No. 33 4,847,840,149 2.7111 3.1751 0.0000 0.0000 5.8862 (1) 2017 Bond Assessed Value does not include TAV. (2) Thurston County values only. Thurston County School Districts 2017 Total Tax Rates (1) 22

23 Tax Rate Comparison District Assessed Value (2) ($) Bonds ($) M&O ($) Capital ($) Trans. ($) Total ($) Peninsula School District No. 401 11,334,740,424 0.3643 2.0863 0.0000 0.0000 2.4506 Fife School District No. 417 2,865,098,351 1.1666 2.8432 0.3696 0.0000 4.3793 Eatonville School District No. 404 1,245,336,053 1.2992 3.6655 0.0000 0.0000 4.9647 Steilacoom Historical School District No. 1 2,814,914,557 2.5220 2.6146 0.0000 0.0000 5.1366 Yelm School District No. 2 461,146,767 1.6216 3.7612 0.0000 0.0000 5.3828 Clover Park School District No. 400 5,373,464,783 1.4888 4.3905 0.0000 0.0000 5.8794 White River School District No. 416 2,605,638,989 2.4535 3.4279 0.0000 0.0000 5.8814 Puyallup School District No. 3 13,852,497,174 2.0658 3.7898 0.0722 0.0000 5.9277 Sumner School District No. 320 6,663,553,496 2.3245 3.3088 0.4285 0.0000 6.0618 University Place School District No. 83 3,123,123,708 2.3054 3.8153 0.2049 0.0000 6.3256 Bethel School District No. 403 9,969,022,839 1.6524 4.4116 0.4527 0.0000 6.5167 Dieringer School District No. 343 1,763,366,498 1.9842 3.5751 0.9796 0.0000 6.5389 Carbonado School District No. 19 80,691,978 0.5642 6.0381 0.0000 0.0000 6.6023 Orting School District No. 344 1,233,887,464 3.1291 3.5240 0.0000 0.0000 6.6531 Auburn School District No. 408 854,015,690 2.6539 3.7505 0.3386 0.0000 6.7430 Tacoma School District No. 10 21,882,718,200 2.5248 3.9637 0.4611 0.0000 6.9496 Franklin Pierce School District No. 402 3,557,220,226 1.1104 5.1787 2.0150 0.0000 8.3041 (1) 2017 Bond Assessed Value does not include TAV. (2) Pierce County values only. Pierce County School Districts 2017 Total Tax Rates (1) 23

24 Neither this material nor any of its contents may be disclosed, sold, or redistributed, electronically or otherwise, without prior written consent of Davidson Companies. The information presented herein is based on public information we believe to be reliable, prevailing market conditions, as well as our views at this point in time. We make no representation or warranty with respect to the accuracy or completeness of this material. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Davidson Companies does not assume any liability for any loss which may result from the reliance by any person upon such material. We make no representations regarding the legal, tax, regulatory, or accounting implications of entering into a Transaction. Required Disclosure Pursuant to MSRB Rule G-23: An underwriter s primary role will be to purchase as principal, or arrange for the placement of the securities in a commercial arm s length transaction with the issuer, and may have financial and other interests that differ from those of the issuer. In its capacity as underwriter and not as financial advisor, an underwriter may provide incidental financial advisory services at the issuer s request, including advice regarding the structure, timing, terms and other similar matters concerning the issuance. However, an underwriter does not assume any financial advisory or fiduciary responsibilities with respect to the issuer.