ACTIONS RELATED TO BOARD OF FAIR CAMPAIGN AND POLITICAL PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES TO THE CITY'S GIFT ORDINANCE UNDER TITLE 12.

Similar documents
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND. FROM: Toni J. Taber, CM1 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW. DATE: November 5, Approval of Adjusted Campaign Contribution Limits.

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SAN JOSH CAPITAL OP SILICON VALLEY F/ZZ/IL. Memorandum. FROM: Kim Walesh Julia H. Cooper TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

BUSINESS TAX MODERNIZATION AND MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE OUTREACH PLAN

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Ticket Distribution & Disclosure Policy

October 17, RE: Your Request for Formal Advice Dated October 8, 2003 QUESTION

Guide to Reporting Gifts, Honoraria and Travel Payments. Legal Guidance Provided by CSBA

Holiday Gift Reminder

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

ACTIONS RELATED TO THE RECYCLE PLUS RATES FOR SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTI-FAMILY SERVICES

APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS FOR REVENUE ENHANCEMENT SERVICES RELATING TO SALES AND USE TAX, TELEPHONE LINE TAX, UTILITY USERS TAX AND FRANCHISE FEES.

Limitations and Restrictions on Gifts, Honoraria, Travel and Loans

City Contributor Guide

Limitations and Restrictions on Gifts, Honoraria, Travel and Loans

TASK FORCE ON INCOME INEQUALITY. Public Meeting #2 Council Chambers August 5th, PM - 6PM

Limitations and Restrictions on Gifts, Honoraria, Travel and Loans

Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Toni J. Taber, C City Clerk SUBJECT: SEE BELOW. DATE: October 13, 2016

General Fund Revenue Overview

CITY OF LOS ANGELES. August 2000

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: March 23, 2017

Memorandum \[\<<\\* /7/ TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Barry Ng Jennifer A. Maguire

Budget Forum February 2, 2018

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SUBJECT: CITY OF SAN JOSE DATE: June 5, TAX AND REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTE

HOUSING AND LABOR MARKET TRENDS: CALIFORNIA

Limitations and Restrictions on Gifts, Honoraria, Travel and Loans

contributor guide city elections

Budgeted in General Fund $ 83,177, % $ 94,421, % Budgeted outside of the General Fund 59,944, % 48,699,

Limitations and Restrictions on Gifts, Honoraria, Travel and Loans

CITY CLERK MISSION STATEMENT STRUCTURE AND SERVICES

Limitations and Restrictions on Gifts, Honoraria, Travel and Loans

OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR

Human Resources Director

zst FROM: Kip Harkness Kim Walesh Margaret McCahan TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: April 19,2018 Approved g (_ Date

SUBJECT: Valuation of Gifts of Admission to an Event in a Skybox or Private Suite

CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Incompatible Activities

OJAI VALLEY SANITARY DISTRICT A Public Agency

City Council Agenda Item

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SUBJECT: AUDIT OF TEAM SAN JOSE'S PERFORMANCE

Agenda Report. TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: March FROM:

Glendale Unified School District BP 9270 Board Policy Page 1 of 9. Conflict of Interest and Disclosure Code. Section 100

FORM 2: CAMPAIGN CONSULTANT RE-REGISTRATION REPORT

SANJOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Bidder Responsibilities

(b) Approve a ten percent contingency in the amount of $304,024; and

HOUSING AND LABOR MARKET TRENDS: CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR-RECORDER STATEMENT OF INCOMPATIBLE ACTIVITIES

~~\0<-Q Gene D. Block Chancellor

Dreams Deferred: Impacts and Characteristics of the California Foreclosure Crisis

REPORT ON RFP AND ACTIONS RELATED TO WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES

STAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: October 24, 2017

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

STATEMENT OF INCOMPATIBLE ACTIVITIES

GIFT, TICKET AND HONORARIA POLICY

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: April 13, 2017 ANNUAL PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE STATUS REPORT & FUNDING STRATEGY UPDATE.

City and County of San Francisco Employees Retirement System

A Public Document. Fair Political Practices Commission

SAN FRANCISCO ARTS COMMISSION STATEMENT OF INCOMPATIBLE ACTIVITIES

10.1. Placerville, a unique historical past forging into a golden future.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Incompatible Activities

Section 4.1: Fundraising & Development

Memorandum. FROM: Julia H. Cooper TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. SUBJECT: BANKING SERVICES REP DATE: June 23, 2017 REASON FOR ADDENDUM

Basics of Municipal Finance: Revenue Sources, Debt Financing, and Spending and Debt Limitations

1. Accept staff report on the updated study of cost of service to provide potable water to San Jose Municipal Water System (SJMWS) customers; and

January 30, 2002 QUESTION RELEVANT FACTS

MAYOR S OFFICE OF ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT STATEMENT OF INCOMPATIBLE ACTIVITIES

Underwriter Responsibilities

for Designated Officials

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

2014 U.S. Census (2015) Median African-American Household Income Rank, Memphis Included. Household Median Income Ranking, African American Population

ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM MEMORANDUM

Agenda Report. Agenda Item No. 2c DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2012 CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: SUBJECT: CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE UPDATE

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AND THE WILDLIFE CENTER OF SILICON VALLEY FOR WILDLIFE SERVICES

425 MARKET STREET SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE: FACSIMILE: MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP BEIJING, BERLIN, BRUSSEL

Board Member Ethics and Conflicts of Interest

Form 700. Statement of Economic Interests. Also available on the FPPC Web site: Form 700 Reference Pamphlet 2007/2008

California Fair Political Practices Commission Frequently Asked Questions: Form 700 Disclosure

& OUTDOOR OlFTFRONT Z>

Property Taxes: Why Some Local Governments Get More Than Others

Fiscal State of the University. Presentation to the Academic Senate

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

ATTACHMENT A /14 Final Budget Allocations, Gross Budget Summary Coded Memo B , July 24, 2013

Any observations not included in this report were discussed with your staff at the informal exit conference and may be subject to follow-up.

To approve and provide input on key start-up activities toward a targeted April 2018 launch for the first phase of San Jose Clean Energy customers.

ITEM 53. Council to Consider the Following 1 Hold a Public Hearing and 2 Introduce Ordinance to Amend Section a of the Lathrop Municipal Code

REPORT TO SMART GROWTH AND LAND USE

TRANSMITTAL DATE COUNCIL FILE NO. TO Deborah Flint, Executive Director Department of Airports COUNCIL DISTRICT 11.

SIX AGENCY COMMITTEE Statements of Cash Receipts and Disbursements. Years ended June 30, 2014 and (With Independent Auditor s Report Thereon)

APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL PROJECT COMPLETION AGREEMENT WITH CMK, LLC (DBA BAPC, LLC)

pm»i»i fh <m L'* f * u 1g I05n II I t \ MICHAEL N. FEUER CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE:

2006/2007 Form 700 Statement of Economic Interests. Reference Pamphlet. California Fair Political Practices Commission

COIA Workshop. Virginia Mayors Institute - VML. September 30, 2017 Williamsburg, Virginia. Presented by Andrew R. McRoberts, Sands Anderson PC

FPPC Update. Rachel H. Richman, City Attorney, Rosemead, Assistant City Attorney, Alhambra and Santa Clarita

San Francisco Department of Public Health Barbara A. Garcia, MPA Director of Health

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OP SILICON VALLEY

Transcription:

Council Agenda: 6/20/17 ITEM: 3.4 CITY OF fft SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW Memorandum FROM: Toni Taber, CMC City Clerk DATE: SUBJECT ACTIONS RELATED TO BOARD OF FAIR CAMPAIGN AND POLITICAL PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES TO THE CITY'S GIFT ORDINANCE UNDER TITLE 12. RECOMMENDATION 1) Consider the recommended revisions of the Board of Fair Campaign and Political Practices to the City's Gift Ordinance and the proposed ordinance to amend Title 12 of the San Jose Municipal Code to align the City's Gift Ordinance with the gift regulations under the California Political Reform Act. 2) Approve an ordinance amending Title 12 of the San Jose Municipal Code to align the City's Gift Ordinance with the gift regulations under the California Political Reform Act. Please note: Approval of this item requires 8 or more affirmative votes (2/3). BACKGROUND In the Mayor's 2015 Biennial Ethics Review and Recommendations, the Board of Fair Campaign and Political Practices ("Board"), then Ethics Commission, was directed "to recommend revisions to the Gift Ordinance [SJMC Chapter 12.08] to better align with the State gift rules and simplify the compliance with conflicting rules" because "the City's current Gift Ordinance does not align with State-level rules and can be confusing to interpret." Following this direction, the Board is recommending the following recommendations with a draft Gift Ordinance for the Council's consideration.

Page 2 ANALYSIS 1. City's Gift Ordinance Requirements The Gift Ordinance was adopted in 1993 (Ord. 24499) as part of a comprehensive ethics ordinance that established Title 12. The Gift Ordinance was then amended in 2004 (Ord. 27258) to make technical changes; to clarify that the reporting and disqualification requirements of the Political Reform Act applied; and to increase the gift limit exception from $15.00 to $50.00. No revisions have been made since 2004. Under the Gift Ordinance, City officials and designated employees cannot "accept any gift, directly or indirectly, from any person who is subject to the decisionmaking or recommending authority of such officer or employee, except as specifically provided in [the Gift Ordinance]." Exceptions to this rule include gifts valued at less than $50.00, informational materials, and wedding gifts. 2. Political Reform Act Gift Regulations In contrast, the Political Reform Act does not impose a ban on accepting gifts. Instead, it prohibits public officials, candidates for local elective office, and designated employees from accepting gifts from a single source with a value totaling more than $470.00 in a calendar year. If the gift or gifts have a value of less than $470.00, it can be accepted. But, all gifts with a value totaling $50.00 or more must be disclosed in a Form 700 report. Although there have been no revisions to the Gift Ordinance since 2004, the Political Reform Act has been revised in that time; specifically, to increase the dollar limit with inflation and to expand the exceptions for what is not considered a "gift." The exceptions under the Political Reform Act apply to a range of activities, including: gifts exchanged between dating partners, gifts from long-time personal friends when the gift is unrelated to the official's duties, and free admission to a ticketed event for the official and one guest where the official performs a ceremonial role. Generally, when an exception applies the gift does not need to be reported and it does not count against the $470.00 gift limit. However, public officials are still subject to the Political Reform Act's disqualification rules, and may have to recuse themselves from any decision involving the donor if the gift or gifts exceed $470.00 in value.

Page 3 Although the City has its own Gift Ordinance, it is important to note that compliance with the Political Reform Act is required. 3. Board Recommended Revisions to Gift Ordinance In presenting the draft Gift Ordinance for Council consideration, the Board recommends the following: a. Revise the definition of "gift" to be consistent with the definition in the Political Reform Act. This recommended revision aligns the City's definition of "gift" with the definition in the Political Reform Act. It also incorporates the exceptions in the Political Reform Act. A chart comparing the Political Reform Act with the exceptions in the Gift Ordinance can be found in Attachment 1. Other cities, like San Francisco, San Diego, and Oakland, follow this approach when defining "gift" in their gift ordinances. b. Strike SJMC 12.08.030.B-J, L, and M and 12.08.040.A as redundant or inconsistent with the Political Reform Act. To align the Gift Ordinance with the Political Reform Act, this recommend revision eliminates most of the exceptions currently in the Gift Ordinance as redundant or inconsistent with the Political Reform Act. A comparison of the exceptions in the Political Reform Act with the exceptions in the Gift Ordinance can be found in Attachment 1. c. Refer to a "person subject to the decision-making or recommending authority," in SJMC 12.08.010, as a "Restricted Source." This recommended revision does not make any substantive change to when the City's Gift Ordinance applies. Rather, it follows the example of Oakland and San Diego in referring to the donor of a gift as a Restricted Source. d. Increase the gift exception limit to $250.00, and beginning January 1, 2019 biennially adjust the gift limit to reflect any changes in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose area as published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Statistics.

Page 4 The gift limit in the Political Reform Act is presently $470.00, up from $460.00 for 2015-2016, and the State's limit adjusts every odd-numbered year to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index. The City's Gift Ordinance allows officials and designated employees to accept gifts that are less than $50.00. However, this dollar limit has not increased since 2004. Increasing the gift limit to $250.00 recognizes that the value of things has increased with inflation since 2004 and better aligns with State law. Biennially adjusting this limit for inflation is also modeled after the Political Reform Act, which contains a similar biennial adjustment for inflation. Of the top 20 largest cities in California, Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, and Oakland have gift ordinances similar to San Jose's. Each cities dollar limit is as follows: City (ranked by pop.) Dollar Limit Section Los Angeles San Diego San Jose San Francisco Oakland Cannot accept gifts of more than $100.00 from a "Restricted Source" in a calendar year. Cannot accept gifts of more than $470.00 from a "Restricted Source" in any calendar year. May accept gifts valued at less than $50.00. May accept non-cash gifts worth $25.00 or less, up to four times per year. Cannot accept gifts of more than $50.00 in calendar year from "Restricted Source" LAMC 49.5.8(C)(4) SDMC 27.3520 *Same limit as State law. Adjusts for inflation. SJMC 12.08.030(A) SF Campaign and Governmental Code 3.216(b)(1) EC Regulations 3.216(b)-5 OMC 2.25.060(C)(3) Other large California cities, such as Sacramento, Fresno, and Long Beach, have no gift ordinance and defer to State law. Accordingly, the dollar limit in those cities is $470.00.

Page 5 e. Modify SJMC 12.08.030.K to allow for "commemorative gifts." The Gift Ordinance allows officials and designated public employees to accept "flowers, plants or balloons which are given on ceremonial occasions, to express condolences or congratulations, or to commemorate special occasions." This recommended revision would change the exception to "commemorative gifts, such as flowers, plants or balloons which are given on ceremonial occasions, to express condolences or congratulations, or to commemorate special occasions." Although the Political Reform Act exceptions cover a broad range of gifts, keeping this exception ensures that San Jose's long-standing exception allowing the acceptance of these types of commemorative gifts remains intact. f. Make technical changes and reorganize Chapter 12.08. The draft ordinance also makes technical changes to reflect the dissolution of the redevelopment agency and reorganizes the Gift Ordinance. 4. Additional Considerations a. Form 700 Reporting Increasing the dollar limit to $250.00, as recommended by the Board, will require City officials and designated employees to be mindful of Form 700 reporting requirements. Under State law, gifts must be reported on a Form 700 when it is valued at $50.00 or more, unless an exception applies. (Gov. Code 87103(e).) However, the City's current Gift Ordinance prohibits City officials and designated employees from accepting most gifts that are valued at $50.00 or more. If the Council increases the gift limit to $250.00, then gifts that have a value between $50.00 and $250.00 must be reported on a Form 700. b. Family Gift Reporting Under the Gift Ordinance, City officials and designated employees are required to file a family gift report with the City Clerk. This report discloses any gifts that a spouse or dependent child receives that would have been prohibited had the City official or designated employee received it. Increasing the dollar limit from $50.00 to $250.00 would mean that City officials and designated employees would only need to report gifts received by family members if the total value of the gift is over $250.00.

Page 6 PUBLIC OUTREACH The Board of Fair Campaign and Political Practices discussed the Gift Ordinance and potential revisions on June 8, 2016, January 11, 2017, and February 8, 2017. This memo has been posted on the City Clerk's website as a part of the June 20, 2017 City Council Agenda. COORDINATION This memorandum has been coordinated with the Office of the City Attorney and the Board of Fair Campaign and Political Practices. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION See Analysis for the recommendation approved at the February 8, 2017 Board of Fair Campaign and Political Practices meeting. CEQA Not a project. Toni J. Taber, CMC City Clerk For questions, please contact Toni J. Taber, City Clerk, at (408) 535-1260.