In my presenta7on I will be looking at informa7on that helps to portray where we are today, the path we ve traveled in the last decade and a half, and

Similar documents
Methodology behind the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta s Labor Force Participation Dynamics

Baby Boomers and Ac/ve Ageing: What is the Future for South Australia?

Labor Force Participation Rates by Age and Gender and the Age and Gender Composition of the U.S. Civilian Labor Force and Adult Population

Keeping Seniors Connected to the Labor Market:

Lecture Notes Module 1: Health Care and Health Care Policy. Slide 1: Introduc0on

Demographic Trends: The 2mes they are a changin Highlights from the 2011 Census and Na2onal Household Survey

Population & Demographic Analysis

Florida Demographic In-Depth Analysis

Opting out of the labor force and does the unemployment rate still matter?

OVERVIEW OF THE SAN DIEGO REGION Current Conditions and Future Trends

State of Delaware Office of Management and Budget Human Resource Management

Population and Labor Force Projections for New Jersey: 2008 to 2028

Oregon Population Forecast Program Regional Forecast Meeting - September 23, 2014

Rifle city Demographic and Economic Profile

MEMORANDUM. Gloria Macdonald, Jennifer Benedict Nevada Division of Health Care Financing and Policy (DHCFP)

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

The Province of Prince Edward Island Employment Trends and Data Poverty Reduction Action Plan Backgrounder

Florida: Demographic Trends

Retirement Intentions 2006

Texas: Demographically Different

Utah s Long Run Demographic Trends: Evolving Community Contexts

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

Additional Slack in the Economy: The Poor Recovery in Labor Force Participation During This Business Cycle

2017 ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE PROFILE Winnebago County

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

Ravenna s most significant growth occurred before Between 1960 and 1980 the city s population declined by 8.5%.

2017 ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE PROFILE Walworth County

2017 ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE PROFILE Clark County

Measuring Inequality and Poverty in the United States: Challenges and Opportuni;es in the Interna;onal Context

2017 ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE PROFILE Florence County

BUDGET BACKGROUNDER PLANNING FOR CALIFORNIA S FUTURE: THE STATE S POPULATION IS GROWING, AGING, AND BECOMING MORE DIVERSE.

EMPLOYEE TENURE IN 2014

2017 ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE PROFILE Waukesha County

2017 ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE PROFILE Dodge County

2000s, a trend. rates and with. workforce participation as. followed. 2015, 50 th

Methods and Data for Developing Coordinated Population Forecasts

Papers presented at the ICES-III, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

2017 ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE PROFILE Washington County

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

AARP WORKFORCE PROFILES:

AARP WORKFORCE PROFILES:

2017 ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE PROFILE Sauk County

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

2017 ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE PROFILE Kewaunee County

Metro Houston Population Forecast

Demographic Trends and the Older Workforce

WHO S LEFT TO HIRE? WORKFORCE AND UNEMPLOYMENT ANALYSIS PREPARED BY BENJAMIN FRIEDMAN JANUARY 23, 2019

Clay County Comprehensive Plan

AARP WORKFORCE PROFILES:

People Who Are Not in the Labor Force: Why Aren't They Working?

2017 ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE PROFILE Vernon County

2017 ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE PROFILE Green Lake County

The Minneapolis Minimum Wage Increase Baseline Report

THE ECONOMY AND POPULATION OF THE SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN REGION

POLICY PAGE. 900 Lydia Street Austin, Texas PH: / FAX:

TOP EMPLOYERS ARMY 12.2% NAVY 10.9% AIR FORCE 8.4% JUSTICE 5.9% AGRICULTURE 3.8% OTHER 18.3% CLERICAL

Adults in Their Late 30s Most Concerned More Americans Worry about Financing Retirement

2017 ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE PROFILE Dane County

2017 ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE PROFILE Wood County

BROWARD COUNTY LABOR FORCE

Program on Applied Demographics

Minnesota Energy Industry

The Health of Jefferson County: 2010 Demographic Update

Veterans in Texas: A Demographic Study

Regional Prosperity Initiative: Labor Market Information Supplement

SPECIAL REPORT. TD Economics THE WORRISOME DECLINE IN THE U.S. PARTICIPATION RATE

The Labor Force Participation Puzzle

A Summary of The Texas Challenge in the Twenty- First Century: Implications of Population Change for the Future of Texas

NEW STATE AND REGIONAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS FOR NEW SOUTH WALES

In contrast to its neighbors and to Washington County as a whole the population of Addison grew by 8.5% from 1990 to 2000.

Patterns of Unemployment

2018 Trustee & Employee Diversity Update. June 2018

Shingle Creek. Minneapolis neighborhood profile. About this area. Trends in the area. Neighborhood in Minneapolis. October 2011

2017 ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE PROFILE Buffalo County

Price County DETI PRI-P P (N. 3/2016)

Investment Company Institute and the Securities Industry Association. Equity Ownership

EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 6: Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation

Rocky Mountain ECONOMIST: Labor force participation rates have fallen sharply THE

2018:IIQ Nevada Unemployment Rate Demographics Report*

Burnett County DETI BNT-P (N. 3/2016)

Economic Activity Index ( FAFAA-EAI ) October, November and December 2016

Sussex Demographic and Labor Market Trends

Rock County Workforce Profile 2011

TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11 (5 TH EDITION) THE POPULATION OF SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN PRELIMINARY DRAFT SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION

Perspectives on the Youth Labour Market in Canada

2017 ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE PROFILE Brown County

Ins&tute for Fiscal Studies

Charles Sturt An Overview

Health Insurance Coverage: 2001

Unemployment Rates - May 2011

The Relationship Between Income and Health Insurance, p. 2 Retirement Annuity and Employment-Based Pension Income, p. 7

2017:IVQ Nevada Unemployment Rate Demographics Report*

WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT Title I-B Adults and Dislocated Workers July 2002-June 2003

2017 ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE PROFILE Douglas County

Transitions. Population and Economic Trends for Colorado and Garfield County

Enhancing Economic Security for the Latino Community

2017:IIIQ Nevada Unemployment Rate Demographics Report*

2017 ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE PROFILE Grant County

Economics. Unemployment. Labor Force Statistics. In this chapter, look for the answers to these questions: N. Gregory Mankiw

University of Minnesota

Transcription:

I am pleased to be with you this morning to share a demographer s perspec7ve on the characteris7cs and dynamics of the workforce in the Food and Beverage Manufacturing industries. Thank you to NYATEP, the Workforce Development Ins7tute and Cornell Coopera7ve Extension for organizing and planning this event, and to Onondaga Community College for hos7ng us. I am providing a statewide overview of the workforce in New York State from the bakers and candy makers in New York City to the juice processors and yogurt makers in Upstate New York. This is the proverbial view from 10,000 feet. Following this conference and gaining from what we learn today, our team will be assembling a data book with workforce informa7on by economic development region. My presenta7on draws upon data produced by my colleagues in the New York State Department of Labor, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Sta7s7cs, and the U.S. Census Bureau and I owe them a debt of gra7tude. A data analyst is not worth much without data to analyze. Data that are of high quality and 7mely. 1

In my presenta7on I will be looking at informa7on that helps to portray where we are today, the path we ve traveled in the last decade and a half, and look ahead to where we ll likely be in 2020. I will present informa7on on the number of jobs; characteris7cs of workers; where those workers come from; and trends in the supply of workers in general the workforce from which employers in Food and Beverage Manufacturing are drawing their employees. The workforce includes those directly engaged in the processing of food and beverages as well others in the sector who play suppor7ng roles and are in related posi7ons. 2

This is a graph depic7ng the annual average number of jobs in New York State in the Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industries. This line represents 60,000 jobs. Each column represents the average number of jobs during that year. The first column on the lez is for the year 2000, while the last column on the right is the preliminary es7mate for 2014. The low- point in employment shown in this graph is for 2009 during the recent Great Recession. You can see that employment in Food and Beverage Manufacturing has returned to pre- recession levels and now exceeds the previous peak in 2007. AND the number of jobs is approaching the previous high levels of employment in 2000 and 2001. Annual Averages even out seasonal fluctua7ons that occur over the course of a year. A review of the monthly data reveals a turbulent labor market with a great deal of seasonal fluctua7ons. The hiring and training tasks are far more challenging that what this picture portrays. Source: New York State Department of Labor, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, developed through a coopera7ve program between the State of New York and the U. S. Bureau of Labor Sta7s7cs. 3

In this graph I have set up an index for Food & Beverage Manufacturing and all other Manufacturing industries excluding Food & Beverage that is based on employment in the year 2000. The trend since 2000 in all other manufacturing represented by the Blue line has been downward to 2010 and flafened out since at approximately 60 percent of the level in 2000. There has been no rebound. Employment in Food & Manufacturing also declined since 2000 but at a far slower rate than all other manufacturing, bofoming out in 2009, and then a robust rebound since and coming close by 2014 to the level in 2000. Source: New York State Department of Labor, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, developed through a coopera7ve program between the State of New York and the U. S. Bureau of Labor Sta7s7cs. 4

The New York State Department of Labor prepared projec7ons of employment for all sectors of the economy between 2012 and 2022. In this graph I have used their projec7ons to extend the historical series, 2000 to 2014, to the year 2022. Over the next 7 years, the Department of Labor projects that the Food & Beverage Manufacturing sectors will con7nue to grow, adding over 4,500 addi7onal jobs. Finding, training and hiring the workers to fill those posi7ons is in large part what this conference is about. Who are the workers currently employed in Food & Beverage Manufacturing? Associated with these data on JOBS are workers with characteris7cs of their own. Knowing who they are should be helpful in developing the workforce that is needed today and tomorrow. Source: New York State Department of Labor, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, developed through a coopera7ve program between the State of New York and the U. S. Bureau of Labor Sta7s7cs. New York State Department of Labor, Division of Research and Sta7s7cs, Long- Term Industry Employment Projec7ons 5

Here is a composite picture of the average food and beverage manufacturing employee. They are: Male; 43 years old; with a High School diploma and no addi7onal years of educa7on; They were born in New York State And the most frequent occupa7on is Baker The average worker exists, but there is far more diversity in this workforce than is captured by the average. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Quarterly Workforce Indicators 6

36% of the workforce are females, which is greater than the 31% in all manufacturing Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Quarterly Workforce Indicators 7

There are workers across a wide range of ages, with the most frequent being aged 45-54 years old represen7ng 1- out- of- 4. 2/3rds of the workers are in the prime working age range of 25 to 54 years of age. Compared with workers in all manufacturing industries the Food & Beverage industries have a substan7ally greater propor7on of workers under the age of 35. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Quarterly Workforce Indicators 8

The racial composi7on of the workforce is slightly more Black that all Manufacturing Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Quarterly Workforce Indicators 9

And more Hispanic Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Quarterly Workforce Indicators 10

The informa7on on educa7onal afainment of workers aged 25+ shows that the Food & Beverage Workforce differs from All of Manufacturing in that a lower propor7on have a Bachelor s degree or advanced degree, and a higher propor7on have less than a High School educa7on. The educa7on data do not gauge post- secondary technical training or on- the- job training and appren7ceships which we ll hear more about. These data do not dis7nguish between a person who flunked out of their freshman year of college and someone who has a 2- year technical degree. There clearly is a need for more detailed data to befer plan for workforce development. Such efforts are being made and others here likely have more insight regarding this. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Quarterly Workforce Indicators 11

We ve been moving towards the pipeline for workers in Food & Beverage Manufacturing and vola7lity of the workforce. In this graph I am comparing the number of New Hires to Stable Workers in Food & Beverage Manufacturing with the propor7on in All of Manufacturing. New Hires are workers who have been hired and did not work for the employer during the previous year. This dis7nguishes New Hires from those who were on lay- off status and have been Recalled. Stable Workers are those workers who have been with the Employer for at least a year. It is temp7ng that think that New Hires + Stable Workers = Total Workers. They don t because of the dynamic nature of New Hires who may only remain employed for less than a full quarter. Therefore the number of New Hires + Stable Workers is greater than Total Workers. For every 10 Stable Workers over the course of a year, there have been almost 6 New Hires in Food & Beverage Manufacturing. Compared to 3.4 to 10 in All Manufacturing. The turnover of new employees in Food & Beverage Manufacturing is substan7ally greater than in Manufacturing in general. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Quarterly Workforce Indicators 12

Foreign Born persons are an important source of workers for Food & Beverage Manufacturing. 7 out of 10 workers are na7ve born and 3 of 10 were born abroad. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2009-2013 Public Use Microdata. Tabula7ons by Cornell Program on Applied Demographics. 13

Of the na7ve born over half were born in New York State. The next most frequent birthplace is Puerto Rico, who are US Ci7zens by birth and included in the 7 of 10 na7ve born displayed in the previous slide. The border states of Pennsylvania and New Jersey come next with less than 2% of the workers, followed by California and Florida- - #1 and #3 largest states also with robust Food and Beverage Manufacturing economies. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2009-2013 Public Use Microdata. Tabula7ons by Cornell Program on Applied Demographics. 14

Recall that 3 out of 10 workers in Food and Beverage Manufacturing are foreign born. Mexico is the place of birth for most of the Foreign born. The Caribbean, Central and South America are well represented. China is a major contributor and the only country outside the Western Hemisphere. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2009-2013 Public Use Microdata. Tabula7ons by Cornell Program on Applied Demographics. 15

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2009-2013 Public Use Microdata. Tabula7ons by Cornell Program on Applied Demographics. 16

How many speak Spanish? 21,642 of 34,364 who speak another language at home speak Spanish, that is 63% 2/3rds of those Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2009-2013 Public Use Microdata. Tabula7ons by Cornell Program on Applied Demographics. 17

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2009-2013 Public Use Microdata. Tabula7ons by Cornell Program on Applied Demographics. 18

Almost half the New Hires are females yet fewer than 2 out of 10 Stable Workers are females Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Quarterly Workforce Indicators 19

Younger workers under the age of 35 are far more common among the New Hires, while older workers over 45 years of age are approximately half the stable workforce. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Quarterly Workforce Indicators 20

The differences between New Hires and Stable Workers is less than in the previous characteris7cs. That said, Blacks are a greater propor7on of the New Hires than the Stable Workers. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Quarterly Workforce Indicators 21

Very slight differences for Hispanic workers. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Quarterly Workforce Indicators 22

and also very small differences based on educa7onal afainment for the New Hires and Stable Workers aged 25 and older. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Quarterly Workforce Indicators 23

Popula7on Persons aged 16+ who are not in the military, and not in an ins7tu7on such as a prison, mental hospital, or nursing home. This is the Civilian Non- Ins7tu7onal Popula7on aged 16+ Labor Force - comprises persons are employed full and part- 7me and persons who are ac7vely seeking employment. Labor Force Par7cipa7on Rate is the propor7on of the Popula7on who are in the Labor Force. To project the size of the Labor Force in the future, requires that we project the Popula7on and the Labor Force Par7cipa7on Rate. This is best done by breaking the popula7on into cohorts by Age and Sex. 24

Here is the Labor Force Par7cipa7on Rate for Females and Males by Age Group, based on the U.S. Census Bureau s American Community Survey and responses gathered over the period January 2009 through December 2013. Except in the Age Group 16 to 24, Males had higher par7cipa7on rates than females. Note that the prime working ages are 25 to 34, 35 to 44, and 45 to 54. Then as the popula7on ages the labor force par7cipa7on rate declines for males and females. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2009-2013 Public Use Microdata. Tabula7ons by Cornell Program on Applied Demographics. 25

In this slide I combine males and females and compare Labor Force Par7cipa7on Rates by Age Group between 2000 data from the long form of the decennial census and the 2009-2013 period and data from the American Community Survey. The data are comparable although there were important differences in methods of collec7on. The Bureau of Labor Sta7s7cs reported that na7onally the Labor Force Par7cipa7on rates declined between 2000 and 2010, yet for these data the rates increased except for the youngest workers. In the midst of a recession higher propor7ons of youth enroll in post- secondary educa7on. A third source, the Census Bureau s Current Popula7on Survey, processed by the New York State Department of Labor reported a slight overall decline in the Labor Force Par7cipa7on Rate between 2000 and 2010. Which trend should we go with for projec7ons of the 2020 Workforce that is, the Total Supply of Workers from which all employers will be hiring. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2009-2013 Public Use Microdata. Tabula7ons by Cornell Program on Applied Demographics. U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census of Popula7on and Housing, Public Use Microdata Sample. Tabula7ons by Cornell Program on Applied Demographics. 26

For today s presenta7on, I chose to return to the Labor Force Par7cipa7on Rates reported in 2000. These are likely to be higher than other forecasts and will produce a larger poten7al Labor Force. Source: Program on Applied Demographics, Cornell University 27

Turning to the Popula7on component of the projec7on of future Labor Force, here is a graph represen7ng New York State s popula7on in 2010 the most recent census of popula7on. The Male popula7on is represented by the Blue bars on the lez hand side and Females by the Gold bars on the right hand side. The popula7on is further broken out by 5- year age groups with the youngest at the bofom and the oldest at the top. Baby Boomers born 1946 to 1963 1990: Aged 27 to 44 2000: Aged 37 to 54 2010: Aged 47 to 64 2020: Aged 57 to 74 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census of Popula7on and Housing, Summary File 1. Program on Applied Demographics, Cornell University 28

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1990 Census of Popula7on and Housing, Summary Tabula7on File 1. Program on Applied Demographics, Cornell University 29

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census of Popula7on and Housing, Summary File 1. Program on Applied Demographics, Cornell University 30

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census of Popula7on and Housing, Summary File 1. Program on Applied Demographics, Cornell University 31

Source: Program on Applied Demographics, Cornell University 32

The workforce in New York State in 2020 will be older and smaller than in previous periods. This will require a coordinated effort to more effec7vely u7lize this precious resource. Source: Program on Applied Demographics, Cornell University 33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41