Juvenile Justice System and Adult Community Supervision Funding

Similar documents
Overview of Department of Criminal Justice Funding for the Biennium PRESENTED AT THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON CORRECTIONS

Adult and Juvenile Correctional Population Projections. Fiscal Years 2016 to 2021 LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF

Overview of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Correctional Population Projections, Recidivism Rates, and Costs Per Day

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. Adult and Juvenile Correctional Population Projections

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. Cost Drivers and Revenues Ten-Year Trend LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD JANUARY 2009 ADULT AND JUVENILE CORRECTIONAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEARS

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Juvenile Correctional Population Projections. Legislative Budget Board Criminal Justice Data Analysis Team December 2011

TARRANT COUNTY COMMUNITY SUPERVISION AND CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT

Texas At-Risk Youth Services Project (ARYSP) Legislative Budget Board Criminal Justice Data Analysis Team October 2011

SENATE LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. Summary of Senate Committee Substitute for Senate Bill Biennium

Cost Analysis: Local Examples

HOUSE LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. Summary of Committee Substitute for House Bill Biennium SUBMITTED TO THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS

TPFA Client Agency Orientation May 21, 2008 Handouts

Outstanding Items for Consideration Pended Items Biennial Total. Dedicated

Department of Juvenile Justice. FY2011 Amended and FY2012 Impact Statements for Budget Reductions. August 2010

Billions More in General Revenue Needed for

Texas Association of Counties. State Budget for the Biennium

Judicial Compensation PRESENTED TO JOINT INTERIM COMMITTEE TO STUDY STATE JUDICIAL SALARIES LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF SEPTEMBER 2018

TARRANT COUNTY COMMUNITY SUPERVISION AND CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT. Financial Statements. August 31, (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon)

PUBLIC DEFENDER 0101 GENERAL FUND

HOUSE LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. Summary of Senate Bill 1, as Passed 2nd House Biennium SUBMITTED TO THE TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Circuit Court of Cook County Performance Metrics Department Social Service. 1-Administration

OREGON PUBLIC SAFETY SYSTEM SURVEY DOC Responses (N=4) April 2010

JUVENILE AND DOMESTIC RELATIONS DISTRICT COURT Earl J. Conklin, Director of Court Services. FY 2020 Proposed Budget - General Fund Expenditures

Cost-Benefit Methodology July 2011

Summary of Legislative Budget Estimates Biennium HOUSE SUBMITTED TO THE 84TH TEXAS LEGISLATURE

Justice Reinvestment in Rhode Island Modernizing Supervision Practices

TECHNICAL APPENDIX LIBERTY AND JUSTICE: PRETRIAL PRACTICES IN TEXAS. March 2017

Justice Reinvestment: Increasing Public Safety and Managing the Growth of Pennsylvania Prison Population

Department of Social Services

JUVENILE BOARD OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS TEXAS JUVENILE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT GRANT FUNDS

Overview of State Park System Funding

Greene County, NY Jail Needs Assessment. Population Projections and Jail Bedspace Requirements

Strategic Fiscal Review: Process and Products

Hon. John Whitmire Chair, Senate Criminal Justice Committee P.O. Box 12068, Capitol Station Austin, TX 78711

Department of Social Services

State & National Issues Affecting Health Care in the 81 st Legislative Session

DEFERRED MAINTENANCE FUNDING OVERVIEW

JUSTICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY -- BUDGET TRENDS IN JPS AND THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

Prison Funding Decisions in Florida. Prepared for the National Governors Association Executive Policy Retreat on Sentencing and Corrections May 2008

Department of Corrections

Southwest Region Report April 2010 Report by the Crime and Justice Institute at Community Resources for Justice

DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE RICHMOND, VIRGINIA REPORT ON AUDIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

Increase/ Departmental Summary Actual Actual Actual Actual Request Adopted (Decrease)

TDCJ WHITE PAPER PRIVATIZATION OF TDCJ FACILITIES

Appropriations Overview Biennium. Prepared by LBB Staff February, 2007

Department of State Health Services Riders and Special Provisions

PUBLIC DEFENDER EXPANSION IDS PRESENTATION TO HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE February 20, 2014

Alaska Department of Corrections. FY2017 Department Overview House Finance Sub-Committee January 29, 2016

Department of Corrections Line Item Descriptions. FY Budget Request

Criminal Justice Cost-Benefit Analysis

UCC Summary Governor s Proposed Budget January 10, 2018

Office of Injured Employee Counsel Summary of Recommendations - House Historical Funding Levels (Millions)

No data was reported to P.E.A.K.

Department Program $ Under/(Over) Budget. Notes

RANDALL COUNTY JUVENILE PROBATION DEPARTMENT

RANDALL COUNTY JUVENILE PROBATION DEPARTMENT

PAROLE & PROBATION DIVISION

Community Corrections Partnership AB 109 Funds

Mental Health Services Department Budget Unit 4120 Department Head: James Waterman, Appointed

Presentation of System Assessment and Inmate Capacity Projections

Cost Avoidance Report Per House Bill 3194 (2013)

Test your knowledge of victim services funding in the State of Colorado!

The Oregon Youth Authority Fariborz Pakseresht, Director Joseph O Leary, Deputy Director

Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act (Proposition 36) Implementation in Alameda County Annual Report Fiscal Year July 1, 2003 to June 30, 2004

The Colorado Division of Criminal Justice Summer 2017 Interim Prison Population and Parole Caseload Projections July 2017

Department of Legislative Services

COURT SUPPORT SERVICES

Texas Board of Nursing Summary of Recommendations - House

Local justice reinvestment employs data and collaborative

Circuit Court Judges. Mission Statement. Citizens. Chief Judge. Judges. Circuit Court Judges Chamber. Judicial Administration

Summer 2016 Interim Prison Population and Parole Caseload Projections Pursuant to (m), C.R.S.

FY17 Actual FY18 Budget FY19 Budget

DRC Budget Overview. Correctional Institution Inspection Committee

Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court DWI-Drug Court Cost Study

NO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS IN THE MATTER OF A.C., A CHILD

Filed 10/19/05 In re Ladaysha C. CA1/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2010 As Submitted December 1, 2009

Community Corrections. Department Narrative and Strategic Plan 2. Summary of Revenue and Expense Community Corrections Fund 4

Agency 407 1/29/2013

FY 05 Actual FY 06 Budget FY 07 Budget

Biennial Change. Texas Public Finance Authority - General Obligation (G0) Bond Debt Service 2/6/2015

STATE OF NEW MEXICO HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 5

Results First Benefit-Cost Analyses of Adult Criminal and Juvenile Justice Evidence-Based Programs

Public Defender RECOMMENDED BUDGET FY

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE Applicability: { } All DJJ Staff { } Administration {x} Community Services { } Secure Facilities I.

Summer 2008 Interim Adult Prison and Parole Population Projections

Summary Probation William Burke, Chief Probation Officer

TAX CUTS AND APPROPRIATIONS:

XX... 3 TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION... 3 CHAPTER 811. CHOICES... 4

FY16 Actual FY17 Budget FY18 Budget

SPECIAL PURPOSE AGENCIES

2 CCR Consideration of Criminal History in Employment Decisions.

February Marcia Trick Jaclyn Sappah. National Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors

Accessing crisis services while enrolled in Support Services

Fair Employment & Housing Council Consideration of Criminal History in Employment Decisions Regulations TEXT

KERR COUNTY INDIGENT HEALTH CARE POLICY

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION 1 A126256

ALAMEDA COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT

Transcription:

Juvenile Justice System and Adult Community Supervision Funding PRESENTED TO HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE ON I,IV, AND V LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF APRIL 2018

Statement of Interim Charge Review state funding, including formula funds, for adult probation departments and the juvenile justice system. Consider recommendations to enhance equity, encourage the use of cost-effective practices, and meet the future needs of departments and counties throughout the state. 2

Funding for TJJD and TDCJ Funding for the Texas Juvenile Justice Department (TJJD) and Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) includes state, local, and federal funds. Some strategies are formula funded, while other strategies are not formula funded. Funding for juvenile and adult probation departments can consist of both local and state funds. Funding for juvenile and adult correctional facilities and programs is mostly derived from state funds, though it can include some federal funds. LBB population projections are a component of formula funding. 3

Correctional Population Projections: Overview June 2016 Projections January 2017 Projections Purpose: Informed Agencies Legislative Appropriation Requests Informed the 2018-19 General Appropriation Bills as Introduced Informed the committee substitutes to the 2018-19 General Appropriation Bills as Introduced Based on individual level data through: Fiscal Year 2015 Fiscal Year 2016 Projections (June and January) are based on current laws, policies, and practices. Subsequent shifts in these factors are considered and may be incorporated into future LBB projections. The LBB simulation model incorporates these factors into the population projections and tracks an individual movement into, through, and out of the criminal and juvenile justice system. 4

Correctional Population Projections: Methodology Central Questions How many individuals will enter the system? How long will they stay in the system? Projections Generated Using: Expected number of admissions over the projection period Predicted length of stay of those admitted Predicted length of stay of those in the system at the end of the previous fiscal year 5

TJJD Actual and Projected State Residential Average Daily Population and Operating Capacity 3,000 Fiscal Years 2012 to 2022 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 Actual Population Fiscal Year 2012 1,481 Projected Population Fiscal Year 2017 1,314 Projected Population Fiscal Year 2022 1,331 500 Actual Population Projected Population Actual Operating Capacity Projected Operating Capacity 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 NOTES: Operating capacity represents the total number of beds available for permanent assignment. Not included within this number are 332 temporary assignment (youth management and clinic) beds. Capacity includes 479 permanent assignment beds and 74 temporary assignment beds offline. The operating capacity is projected to increase slightly from fiscal years 2017 to 2018, when the agency returns 36 beds to capacity which are temporarily offline due to construction. The operating capacity for fiscal year 2017 is the operating capacity as of January 2017. SOURCES: Legislative Budget Board; Texas Juvenile Justice Department. 6

Juvenile Parole Projections Fiscal Years 2012 to 2022 1,600 1,200 Actual Projected 800 781 400 412 396 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 SOURCES: Legislative Budget Board; Texas Juvenile Justice Department. APRIL 18, 2018 LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD ID: 5209 7

Juvenile Probation Supervision Populations Fiscal Years 2012 to 2022 40,000 Adjudicated Probation Actual Deferred Prosecution Actual Conditional Pre-Disposition Actual Total Supervision Actual Adjudicated Probation Projected Deferred Prosecution Projected Conditional Pre-Disposition Projected Total Supervision Projected 30,000 26,252 20,000 15,547 20,599 19,887 11,792 11,569 10,000 0 7,970 5,841 5,261 2,735 2,966 3,057 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 SOURCES: Legislative Budget Board; Texas Juvenile Justice Department. 8

Adult Felony Direct Community Supervision 180,000 Fiscal Years 2012 to 2022 Actual Projected 170,000 168,487 160,000 155,643 155,223 150,000 140,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 SOURCES: Legislative Budget Board; Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 9

Adult Misdemeanor Community Supervision Placements Fiscal Years 2012 to 2022 120,000 Actual Projected 110,000 103,514 100,000 90,000 88,033 80,000 76,293 70,000 60,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 SOURCES: Legislative Budget Board; Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 10

TJJD Funding Formula Funding Refers to agency strategies formula-funded by Legislature (does not address TJJD policies or formulas for dispersing grants to local probation departments) Applies to strategies primarily affected by population fluctuations Goal A - Basic Probation Supervision includes funding for face-to-face contacts with probation officers Goal B - Institutional Supervision and Food Service, Halfway House Operations, and Contract Residential Placements includes supervision and food for youth housed in the three types of facilities used for youth committed to TJJD Goal C Parole Direct Supervision - includes funding for face-to-face contacts with parole officers Primary Methodology LBB projected population for each FY multiplied by actual state cost per day (CPD) from the first year of previous biennium and number of days in each FY Other Methodologies May be used if funds transferred in or out of a program or strategy significantly change actual CPD of first year of previous biennium May use agency requested CPD May use previous biennium appropriated CPD 11

Non-Formula Funding TJJD Funding (cont.) Includes strategies, programs and services primarily focused on providing treatment, counseling, and other programs and services based on individual youth needs Goal A Community Programs, Commitment Diversion Initiatives, Mental Health Services Grants, Regional Diversion Alternatives Program Goal B - Education, Health Care, Integrated Rehabilitation Treatment Goal C Parole Programs and Services Goal D Office of Independent Ombudsman Goal E Training and Monitoring Goal F - Administration Methodology may include: Base program or initiative level funding Agency exceptional item funding Funding for new initiative added by the Legislature For example, Regional Diversion Alternatives Program Initiated in 2016-17 at $9.1 million; biennialized to $18.3 million in 2018-19 12

Juvenile Justice Department Juvenile Probation Goal A Community Juvenile Justice Includes nine strategies, eight consist solely of pass-through grant funding for local probation departments Programs include: Basic Supervision Commitment Diversion Programs Mental Health Services Regional Diversion Alternatives Program Community Programs Pre and Post-Adjudication Facilities Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Programs (JJAEPs) Basic probation supervision grants provide only supervision to juveniles in the system Programs and services are funded in other strategies listed above 13

Juvenile Probation General Revenue-Related Funding $154 $153.2 $152 $150 ions $148 $147.5 $147.4 $146.8 Milli $146 $146.7 $144 $141.8 $144.2 $142 $141.0 $140 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Community Juvenile Justice Funding (in $millions) NOTES: FY 2012-2017 expended amounts; FY 2018-19 Appropriated amounts. excludes probation refunds ($2.3 million per biennium). FY 2017 expended includes the first full year of funding for the Regional Diversion Alternatives Program. FY 2018-19 appropriated also includes full funding for this initiative, but is offset by reductions for population projection and cost per day decreases, and agency requested funding levels for mental health services and pre-and post adjudication facilities grants. SOURCES: Legislative Budget Board; Texas Juvenile Justice Department. 14

TJJD State Services and Facilities Goal B State Services and Facilities Includes 13 strategies, 10 provide direct supervision and services to youth committed to state facilities Programs include: Assessment, Orientation, and Placement Services Institutional Supervision, Food Service, Operations, and Overhead Halfway House Operations Contract Residential Placements Educational Services Health and Mental Health, and Psychiatric Care Integrated Rehabilitation Treatment, including Specialized Treatment 15

TJJD State Programs and Services General Revenue-Related Funding $145 $143 $144.2 ions Milli $141 $139 $137 $135 $133 $132.9 $131 $129 $127 $127.0 $126.8 $127.2 $129.0 $129.3 $129.1 $125 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 NOTES: FY 2012-2017 expended amounts; FY 2018-19 appropriated amounts. SOURCES: Legislative Budget Board; Texas Juvenile Justice Department. State-Operated Programs and Services Funding (in $millions) 16

TJJD Parole Goal C Parole Services Includes two strategies: Parole Direct Supervision Parole Programs and Services Parole direct supervision provides basic supervision for youth released from TJJD on parole supervision Parole Programs and Services provide additional services like aftercare, substance abuse counseling, and specialized treatment 17

TJJD Parole General Revenue-Related Funding $6.0 $5.5 $5.3 $5.0 $5.0 ions $4.5 Milli $4.0 $3.5 $3.9 $3.8 $3.6 $3.5 $3.8 $3.7 $3.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 State-Operated Programs and Services Funding (in $millions) NOTES: FY 2012-2017 expended amounts; FY 2018-19 appropriated amounts. SOURCES: Legislative Budget Board; Texas Juvenile Justice Department. 18

Department of Criminal Justice Adult Community Supervision Goal A Community Supervision and Discretionary Programs Goal is to divert offenders from incarceration through the use of community supervision (probation) 123 community supervision and corrections departments (CSCDs) serving Texas 245 counties Community Justice Assistance Division (CJAD) administers state funding to local CSCDs CSCDs submit a strategic plan outlining current programs and services Goal funding includes both formula-funded (Basic Supervision) and non-formula funded strategies (Diversion Programs, Community Corrections, and Treatment Alternatives to Incarceration) 19

Formula Funding TDCJ Basic Supervision Refers to agency strategies formula-funded by Legislature (does not address TDCJ policies or formulas for dispersing grants to local probation departments) Funded by projected number of direct felony and misdemeanor placements at actual cost per day Cost per Day - calculated by using actual GR cost per day of the first year of the previous biennium multiplied by the LBB projection and the number of days in each year of the next biennium Basic Supervision Felony Direct Community Supervision 2018-19 funded at $1.057 per felony offender per day Basic Supervision Misdemeanor Community Supervision 2018-19 funded at $0.70 per placement per day for 182 days per statute Appropriations total $136.4 million in General Revenue-Related Funds in 2018-19 biennium 20

TDCJ Community and Diversion Programs Non-Formula Funding Community Corrections Program Provides a variety of services to probationers Distribution: CJAD distributes funds based on the ratio of felons placed directly on community supervision to population of counties in the CSCD s jurisdiction 2018-19 Appropriations: $83.5 million in GR Diversion Programs - Include residential treatment beds, specialized mental health caseloads, substance abuse programs, and battering intervention and prevention programs Distribution: Discretionary grants awarded to CSCD s for programs that divert offenders from incarceration. Requested through grant application process which considers offenders needs, current CSCD funding, and program performance. 2018-19 Appropriations: $241.0 million in GR, including $6.3 million for new pretrial diversion initiative Treatment Alternatives to Incarceration Program - Provides substance abuse screening, assessment, referral and treatment to offenders who do not qualify for or are unable to afford treatment Distribution: Grants awarded to CSCDs based on application process 2018-19 Appropriations: $19.8 million in GR 21

TDCJ Community Supervision General Revenue Related Funding $320 $310 $300 $290 $300 $297 $315 $297 $313 ions Milli $280 $270 $264 $279 $279 $260 $250 $245.8 $240 $230 $234.8 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Adult CS Funding (in $millions) Adult CS Funding with Health Insurance (in $millions) NOTES: FY 2012-2017 expended amounts; FY 2018-19 Appropriated amounts. excludes cscd refunds ($13.0 million in first FY of each biennium). Dotted line indicates total community supervision funding across agencies. The Eighty-Fifth Legislature transferred state contributions for CSCD health insurance to the Employees Retirement System. SOURCES: Legislative Budget Board; Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 22

Juvenile Justice Department Formula Funding Juvenile Justice Department formula-funded strategies A.1.2. Basic Probation Supervision B.1.3. Institutional Supervision and Food Service B.1.5. Halfway House Operations B.1.9. Contract Residential Placements C.1.1. Parole Direct Supervision How LBB Staff calculate formula funding When developing funding recommendations for formula-funded strategies, three individual components of an equation are used: (1) Days in the fiscal year, (2) Juvenile population projected, and (3) Cost per day (CPD). These three components are multiplied to determine an appropriations amount for the fiscal year. How Components of the Formula are Calculated Component (1) is 365 days in a normal year, and 3666 days in a leap year. Component (2) is the projection for each affected juvenile population as generated by the LBB s Criminal Justice Data Analysis Team. Component (3) is calculated using total General Revenue Fund expenditures, divided by the average daily population, divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (FY 2016 expenditures and data were used in the 2018-19 calculation). Other Considerations The above approach is not a one-size-fits-all solution for the agency, or even each of the strategies listed, and may be altered based on a variety of factors (for example, agency requests or various analyses) and are ultimately the product of legislativee deliberations. *Cost per day for this purpose is only General Revenue funding allocated to a strategy for the purpose of supervising offenders served in programs within that strategy. CPD as described here is NOT to be confused with the CPD provided in the LBB s biennial Uniform Cost Report, which reflects All Funds expenditures, including benefits and other costs not used in formula funding, to determine the total cost of a program. 23

Department of Criminal Justice Formula Funding Department of Criminal Justice formula-funded strategies A.1.1. Basic Supervision F.2.1. Parole Supervision How LBB Staff calculate formula funding When developing funding recommendations for formula-fundean equation are used: strategies, three individual components of (1) Days in a specified time period, (2) Adult population projected, and (3) Cost per day (CPD). These three components are multiplied to determine an appropriations amount for the fiscal year. Adult felony and adult misdemeanor funding recommendations are calculated separately as the result of different statutory requirements. Then funding recommendations for adult felony and adult misdemeanor are summed to determine total formula funding for the strategy. How components of the formula are calculated Component (1) Felony direct community supervision: 365 days in a normal year, and 366 days in a leap year; Misdemeanor community supervision placements: 182 days as required by Government Code Section 509.011; and Parole Supervision: 365 days in a normal year, and 366 days in a leap year. Component (2) as produced by the LBB s Criminal Justice Data Analysis Team Projected adult felony direct community supervision populations (end-of-month yearly average); Projected adult misdemeanor community supervision yearly placements; and Projected adult parole supervision (end-of-month yearly average). Component (3) Felony direct community supervision cost per day (CPD) is calculated using total General Revenue Fund expenditures (less misdemeanor funding), divided by the end-of-month yearly average number of offenders under felony direct community supervision, divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (FY 2016 expenditures and data were used in the 2018-19 calculation). Misdemeanor community supervision placements, CPD is $0.70 cents as required by TDCJ rider 48 (2018-19 biennium). Parole supervision CPD is calculated using total General Revenue Fund expenditures. divided by the end-of-month yearly average number offenders under parole supervision, divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (FY 2016 expenditures and data were used in the 2018-19 calculation). *Funding for Community Supervision and Corrections Department health insurance was previously removed from total General Revenue Fund expenditures in the Basic supervision strategy prior to the CPD calculation. The Eighty-fifth Legislature transferred funding for CSCD health insurance to the Employees Retirement System, which will simplify the calculation going forward. *Cost per day for this purpose is only General Revenue funding allocated to a strategy for the purpose of supervising offenders served in programs within that strategy. CPD as described here is NOT to be confused with the CPD provided in the LBB s biennial Uniform Cost Report, which reflects All Funds expenditures, including benefits and other costs not used in formula funding, to determine the total cost of a program. 24

Contact the LBB Legislative Budget Board www.lbb.state.tx.us 512.463.1200 25