egep Economic Model: Final Report on the Benefits, Costs and Financing of egovernment

Similar documents
Wish List of Modifying National Statistical Infrastructures for Improved International Input-Output Databases

Investment and Investment Finance open questions?

The Research Executive Agency (REA) Administrative Budget 2018

Q1 FY06 HP Earnings Announcement

The Research Executive Agency (REA) The First Amending Administrative Budget 2017

The Research Executive Agency (REA) Administrative Budget 2017

1. Complete the following data concerning the client. This will then appear on every sheet.

How to model the impact of political risk

QUARTERLY REPORT. First Quarter ended June 30, (Results for the Period from April 1, 2018 to June 30, 2018)

Call for Proposals Action 1 Promoting Cluster Excellence (62/G/ENT/CIP/13/C/N04C031) Financial Aspects

University of Sussex EU Referendum Poll April 2016

! " # $% &' H :. [ $567, -/ "*-% $/NL *6 : $ 2 $ $W 4. 40=- Downloaded from journal.bums.ac.ir at 19:49 IRDT on Friday March 22nd 2019 '$5 #$"$%

The Mystery of Low Productivity Growth: Some Insights from Belgium

Evaluation in : Challenges and Opportunities First annual conference of the National Coordination Authority s Evaluation Unit

HP 3Q FY04 earnings announcement

DMI Certification. David G. Lawrence DMI Working Group

EASA MB 01/2013. Cologne, 12 March Agenda item 10: Adoption of the 2014 Draft Budget, Draft Work Programme and Establishment Plan

The benefits of free trade: an introduction

OECD-JRC Second workshop on Composite Indicators of Country Performance. Paris, February 26-27, Stefano Tarantola (JRC)

Information Technology Return on Investment (ROI) Analysis Instructions

QUARTERLY REPORT. Third Quarter ended December 31, (Results for the Period from April 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014)

ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF ASSECO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS SA Consolidated text. Section 1 Name of the company. Section 2 Registered office

CODES FOR PHARMACY ONLINE CLAIMS PROCESSING

PPM Petroleum Policy and Management 4 th Seminar

Panta Rhei Report. On the 44th Panta Rhei conference. 16th 18th of October 2013 Jönköping, Sweden. Panta Rhei Secretariat

SUGGESTED SOLUTION CA FINAL

THE 2015 EU JUSTICE SCOREBOARD

Chapter 5 Polynomials 5.1 Multiplying Polynomials

PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT (PCR)

Measuring Costa Rica s participation in GVC s. Department of Macroeconomic Statistics ICMTEG, Aguascalientes, México Sep-Oct, 2014

BID DOCUMENT. LIMITED TENDER FOR DISPOSAL OF LIFE EXPIED/UNSERVICABLE PCs ITEMS. BSNL/BBNW/Tender/PCs scrapping/t-1003/ / Dated:

TO : Approved Participants February 5, 2003 Registered Options Principals Options Traders NEW EQUITY OPTION CLASSES

Tender Enquiry. Both the sealed bids should be sent in another sealed envelope addressed to the Director, Indian

A Different Approach of Tax Progressivity Measurement

Estimating Okun s Law for Malta

MODEL SETTINGS. September Part III: CVA Pricing Frameworks 1. Market im plied default probabilities. CDS spread. Ha n d e ls b a n ke n Nokia

Framework Program 6 - CPF Editor SUBJECT: Frequently Asked Questions

REQEST F0R PROPOSALS

TAXCAT ELS TAX RETURN PREPARATION AND LODGMENT SOFTWARE

CARBON COMPETITIVENESS INCENTIVE REGULATION

LKAS 11 Construction Contracts

TECH. Esurance TECH Application Form INSURANCE FOR TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES

FIF Clock Offset Survey Preliminary Report

is a registered trademark of Baldor Optimised Control Ltd.

PART I INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ANNOUNCEMENTS OF QUARTERLY (Q1, Q2 & Q3), HALF-YEAR AND FULL YEAR RESULTS.

ACTIVITIES OF INVEGA

INVITATION FOR BID VENDOR: BID OPENING:

EUROPE S SOURCES OF GROWTH

Investment in Austria Stylized Facts

ANNEX. to the Commission decision on the reimbursement of personnel costs of beneficiaries of the Connecting Europe Facility

Employer s EIT Information and Form Booklet.

DELL INC. Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Position (in millions) (unaudited)

European Commission. Economic Tendency Surveys in the EU

Trust, Statistics & Knowledge Evidence from the EC Special Eurobarometer survey 2009

European Innovation Policy. an Economic perspective

QUARTERLY REPORT. September 30, 2010 March 31, 2010 Change

QUARTERLY REPORT. Exchange rate (Yen/US$) Exchange rate (Yen/EURO)

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATIONAL PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION 17-B,

Is economic growth sustainable in Romania?

Funding science, research & innovation

For further information, please see online or contact

HINDUSTAN PREFAB LIMITED

HP 4Q FY03 earnings announcement

Solution-IV TM Accounting Bank Reconciliation

Three months endedd. ended. Resultss Results

Financial Results for Fiscal Year 2014

RECEIVED. loss 19 APR 2017

EU Financial Instruments for Stimulating R&I and Growth

The EU Framework Programme For Research And Innovation ( ) Krastio Preslavsky DG Research & Innovation European Commission

IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates - A Closer Look

Legal & General Assurance Society Limited. Annual Returns to Financial Services Authority for the year ended 31 December 2011

WBCInno presentation. Kick off meeting. Prof. Dr Vesna Mandić University of Kragujevac 18 th December Dr.

OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER

Consolidated Results for Six Months Ended September 30, October 26, 2018 Ricoh Company, Ltd.

Project Management and Resource Constrained Scheduling Using An Integer Programming Approach

Cohesion Policy support for Sustainable Energy

COMMISSION EUROPÉENNE. SEC(2016) 28/2 Bruxelles, le 19 mai 2016

Below are the current active months, active strike prices, and their codes for FINISAR CORPORATION (NEW)

QUARTERLY REPORT. Third Quarter ended December 31, (Results for the Period from April 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017)

STANDARD SUMMARY PROJECT FICHE

Planned cross-border healthcare

Implementation Status & Results India Tamil Nadu Road Sector Project (P050649)

GIES 2008: Measuring Innovation

Consolidated Results for Six Months Ended September 30, October 26, 2018 Ricoh Company, Ltd.

2016 uk judicial attitude survey. Report of findings covering salaried judges in England & Wales Courts and UK Tribunals

Monitoring of Credit Risk through the Cycle: Risk Indicators

- LOWNDs. illi CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. Leading Businesses. Leading Communities Tt Technology Plan A6.2

Mathematics Notes for Class 12 chapter 1. Relations and Functions

The Future of Information Society in EU and Electronic South East Europe (esee) Agenda

The Assessment of Banking Performances- Indicators of Performance in Bank Area

Procurement Plan 2015

, Ill 401,000 8, L.:.2-t>JIL-

IT Financial Management

Mexico HELP.CAINTMX. Release 4.6C

Retention periods for OLAF personal data processing operations

QUARTERLY REPORT. First Quarter ended June 30, 2012 (Results for the Period from April 1, 2012 to June 30, 2012)

Risk Management Strategy January NHS Education for Scotland RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

Prisoner s dilemma for EU bank groups

EUROPE 2020 Towards the 2013 Annual Growth Survey

IPSAS WORKSHOP. The benefits, Challenges and way forward of IFMIS in Kenya. Golf Hotel - Kakamega, 18 th -19 th July Uphold. Public.

Transcription:

MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive egep Economic Model: Final Report on the Benefits Costs and Financing of egovernment Marcella Corsi and Carlo D Ippoliti and Andrea Gumina and Michele Battisti European Commission DG Information Society and Media 25. March 2006 Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/34396/ MPRA Paper No. 34396 posted 3. October 20 09:26 UTC

! ""#

* + * -. * -.! * /. 0 /. 0! /2. 3 * 3 * * ** * *! 4 56 7 8 4 56+7 8! 92:+ ; 7 3 <: =223 *# " > 6@8 6 A8! * *69 BA@8 0 6+<=8*" + ** CCD> E *! CCD9>*3 CCD> F" CCD>+ F;!"# $ & $ " ""!&$ "

= > & G & G 7&G 9& G & ""! + &! & ""# + $" + > > E : :E#: &9E*;40; = "":9:"39:9 C 3;*> ""> "H ""# ""# $ " ""!&$ "

# 2 A ""! & # 2 > @ & # #*6: 8 & 2 7 6 I8& 2 : " & > I& & E& & 68 & 2 @@ @ E7 33": 2 : && I 6 8-& F> & + "& I > & 2J & > F & 2 & & 2 &2 :62:8 & $ " ""!&$ " *

& @ & & 7: & 2 J& * &I 2 4 I & & 2& & :: & @ F ICT Capital deepening Embodied tech. progress Average Labour Productivity Total Factor Productivity Labour productivity Firm s productivity MFP Economic Growth -&>/ & & & : 2 & I & C& :H H & F F F F : & H * HH&I68 I & $ " ""!&$ "

:> ::: & I :: & : & III& > & & 2 > & I: 2 > I 2 & & I 2 & :6 7 8& I ICT accelerator dynamic eco. of scale Cumulative processes Aggregate Demand Employment Increasing Productive capacity multiplier Economic Growth -&>/ & + 2 :& &:-& > & & & 2 : $ " ""!&$ "!

&2 > = H H&!"# $ $ & $ $ $ & # $ * / & : & :& : & & & I&H& 2 = & E & &I E& &. /+ I +! "! K> & FF & I F 6 0 & > +-! "!.# 7 & I 7 > & I J & & & & I& > & &+ 2/ 2 π > + / π F > @ & & 2&J $ " ""!&$ " #

I 2& & & & I & &5 2: I & & & & & I & & 6 8& @ & & I &FI F F & & I > &&& & # 7 & :@ & : 2 & &68& E& I 6 :8@>2 & & J& I & > +-0.# 068+@ & +F0 & H& @ 68 - H I> 68& & &H # + & @ I & 6 8 I& H H I $ " ""!&$ " ;

H I6+98 I&HI & I && H & & & & HF & &::& & & H & 5: && 2 E& "" : & "" H : & "" =H : : : : A """ & < """ & C "" : F 33& """& "" : I H& & A H & H 3 2 & 2 ""*& H& & C E L & :: H :$2 """$2 "" E& E& : & """ H "" : & : I> : : : : & & & F $ " ""!&$ " 0

"" H& F > ""*&2 E:! =I & """& "" & "" &222 "" & &I & II &<7$&> F 4 2 & I E& & > I & & @: : & & & I = 2 & 2 2 & I 2 & 5 H 2 F I F H 2 & 2 F & $ 2$ 3 2 > 4 56 8*J $ " ""!&$ " 3

4 56+ 8 * J * 92:< + **J *J! <2: *!J * *! & & *# -&& > E>EJ $E>$EJ $E>$E & @& 45 45#E : I > & 68 & &> ASCU = Averagewaitingtimeforchannel * channeluse* averagecompensationperusers rangeperhour * users range & & & &! && 7 & 7 <& &&68& 2 $E&&&IF 6 5 65#$E& &F 68&F 6 8 & I I & 2 J & I $E& & & & & E 6 5 65# $E $E : & 68 $E H & & $E& 5! && @ & $ " ""!&$ " "

5 & =&E& 67 8#90 & F 2 & > J J 7"" # 2 & > >J H $ E $E&4$E$E - $E4$EJ HIJ J C J 9 I 6 8&I &7K 2 6I8 I # I 68& GDP PS $ & ; > < MN $ & # 2&&I > & I & & J I& I ; > b YPSd Y & b M 6 8 PSd M & & $ " ""!&$ "

7" 8 # 8 & & F & 6 8 4 @& : & & F > 5 :9 ; & 68 J 9 < & 8 0. > : & : > & ; J + < E <E I: J 7 H > 5 & & F $ #& # 4 * 8 @&& & & & : & & & & I : : & & 6 8 : & 0 > [ wb c ] 0 b Y PS efy = Pr Pr * wb t + Pr Pr * wc t + Pr Pr b PS ef PS ef b t b t c t c t g t g t * + t M6 8J > Y PS efy M$ &J Prb t Prb t Prc t Prc t Pr g t Pr g t M4 9:J M4 :J M4 :J w b tm684 &J w c tm@&j $ " ""!&$ "

/ I & F 3 & 9 23 6 8 & : &4 : & 2 4 F & & : #4 */ $ & I & 2; & 2 2: & F & 6 :8 7 & & I " > $& C & w b c t > > $ 9 : C : + M @& 3 @ 2@ & : C& & @ " * b PS ns Y PS ns = Pr ns * ts + UOns + I ns = + = + & $ : : @ $ $ : = + 2 + <E & = 94 $ C & Y PS ns MC &J b PS nsmc J Prns M C&J ts M :C&J * UO ns M < E C :&J I ns M &C $ " ""!&$ " *

< & 2 <E & I H 6 F8 68 $ : $ /H7 5 F 5 & & F &! # "& & & 2 & @ > & & I& & F &&C + @ 4 F O& & @F 2 68 68 & F I &&& ;$ < & I F & : & F F & > : J & & & & < 2& $ 2> C H& & & >: J ::I & 2 $ " ""!&$ "

I > & J : I 68 H F I H & 6 7 8 &P 7 7> F * 7 & = $ < + + 9C + #6"&7 8 90 & #9 & I 4 &26+7 8= $ $ $ < $ H & 4 68 68 I & & 68 7 H && > $& :& : & & :& * b Y PS = b YPSd + b PS ef Y PS efy + b PS ns Y PS ns + b PS eft Y PS eft& Y PS Y PSd Y PS efy M&J M&J M$ &J MC &J Y PS ns Y PS eft M6 8& $ " ""!&$ "!

$& : & : / 6 F8 & I 5 & L & & 4 F -& & 2 >! J # J > $& : & 2 :: L ; J 0 H & 6 8& I & 3 > = W W PS t jn = PS i t jn N * k * PS t jn i W PS t jnm& & J k i M& <E : J * N PS t jnm 2 <E : P! hw t nmj P # sw t nmj P ; cp t n M P 0 tp t nm $ " ""!&$ " #

: & : > & 4 F& 4 2:> 3 " > +7 = = = $& : & : @ $ : : & :. & <E7 & 2: 6 8 I:> & 2: & 2: & H & && W L = π & & : &2 2 9 & 3 P egov t n = P hw t n + P sw t n + P cp t n + P tp t n Pegov t jn & $ " ""!&$ " ; M : & & : " c W PS t n P egov t n & c M6+7 8&J

& & / & > > -& & 68 E&& I& & I 2 & I 4 & : F&692:< + 8 > +:@ = = = $ & $ E& : & < E & E&$E $ & : & 7 $ $E& L PS t W PS t = & π PS t LPS t M&<E d LPS t + ASCU t + ASVU t > t M & 5 & :&J ASCU ASVU t M&& :&J $ " ""!&$ " 0

3 "" #9 / H 2 & 6 8 & & > & & & & && & I 6+7 8& I & F& > I JI! J I # J I ; > 0 > : 4 A5 B H 2 & 2 & > & = = I & : I & : : & : & I & : I & : * eit jn# E hw t jn! E sw t jn # E cp t jn ; E tp t jn e E + E + E + E 0 hw t jn sw t jn cp t jn tp t jn $ " ""!&$ " 3

2 : / & 2 2: & & 68 & & & : : &> I :& & & H &F 22 3 > -& $ $ π PS t + e E = by hw t jn PS + c W + E sw t jn PS t n + E P cp t jn egov t n + E + d L tp t jn PS t + ASCU + f ht+ rs+ li t t + ASVU t + && &I C "!"! > 9 F & #! : & + H 2 & = 3 f ht rs + li t = = + $: & $: & $ & $ " ""!&$ " "

68 & & > I *" J I * J I * J I ** J & * > / & β : 8 H & & F& I > β = I I I I # 3 & / FCCD27 I C& 2 F & > I *" hw t E * sw t E * cp t E ** tp t * E GDP t = β E hw t + E sw t + E cp t + Etp t PS I 2 $ " ""!&$ "

& : J F & 2 I & & II & & && & :& F& F & & 6 28 & F " $ D > *&* :> > :* * * *! E 2 I F H + F />H@ & A E L & A 9 BA@+< 3 /8;&F 0 I H 6H 86 8 $ " ""!&$ "

33; F2 7& I + 233; "" @ 2 ""&""" & @ @ I I II2I I& & I / "" I"&""" J ; I2 F 4 2 5 F CCD > : F & New revenues 00 80 60 40 20 0 200 2004 7 F & 6H 8 I > "" "Q ""& 0"Q : & $ " ""!&$ " *

! R3" > I """""""F &R " F """&R*" :#&""" &R" E F :> 4.000 40.000 39.000 38.000 37.000 36.000 35.000 34.000 33.000 32.000 Number of Employees 997 200 2002 2003 HI &FF &*&"""!Q2 / & & :: " $ " ""!&$ "

Costs of hardware and software 60000000 40000000 20000000 00000000 80000000 60000000 40000000 20000000 0 global expenses in hardware and software last two years expenses in hardware and software for the programme C I 3 "QI HF&"" & I : & &: F "&""" 2 > 2 333C """R3&!""&"""#0Q I R &!""&"""* Q & & & & & & & 2H2& & > & :&I+7 & I ; &!Q!#Q R&"""&"""2 >!QR!&"""&"""!!QR#&"""&""" 3 /8G0 EL A A&!"!#$ $ " ""!&$ "!

I2 A A/ I : & I & & & 7 & & C < AA A 2 H #! E A& & I A< I 2 I 2 & > & & / A 2 2 F " 7 2 2& &F & 2 F& & F A< A<A H & F &- < & > 7FH & 2 & I & IF : E& F H $ " ""!&$ " #

! :> > "#&""" 2 - < & 2 2 & & ""Q & F S &A 250 200 50 00 hardware software 50 0 year -2 year - actual year F& 2 I & A& $ " ""!&$ " ;

- < & / & & & & & 2 & & > @ & & & @+7 & &&! 9 & "Q "!Q 3 /8.HGF0 / : > &= &=+& +H 30# #/ +C & I& F & = & & 33" = > & & ** 9 = + + : "" > F > / > ** & I4 2IF ; & &2 I +& ** $ " ""!&$ " 0

Files yearly dealt for services 4000000 3500000 3000000 2500000 2000000 500000 000000 500000 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 Automation of court Procedures Land Register and Companies Register Electronic Legal Communication Edict File H & = &=+ +H & F HI = R! ""&HR! < = "" 5 ""! 00Q "!Q :> &""" Q &!Q 2 2 -I ""# $ " ""!&$ " 3

Investment in hardware thousands of euro 50000 40000 30000 20000 0000 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Investment for ICT services Other investment & I 7 & Investment led effect expenses 3000000 2500000 2000000 500000 000000 500000 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 consultancy training *" & #"Q & 33 3/8AB#0 & & EL * $ " ""!&$ " *"

= """& +<+<= &&& + *#! +< I& & 2 " I ""!+< 2 : < & I & I H& $+I > & I H& R#! ""R"# ""! Cost of staff 2002-2005 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 0000 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 :> Officers Managers #"2 0Q!"3+T9& "" ""2+< &!Q 2I& & $ " ""!&$ " *

Costs for hardware and software 2000000 800000 600000 400000 200000 000000 800000 600000 400000 200000 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 Hardware Software Q "" ""!& 2 : 2 +*Q @ "" I > I R R3 * #!Q!*Q "Q 3Q >4444U "! / HI < $+I *Q F F ;Q +< F +< & & + I & I I & 9+< 2 $ " ""!&$ " *

& & "" & 6 C < 8&&!C*& & H """& 6 : &.8&*+- & C #0&E + * & H "" & 6 C 33 : ""8&& + &*&*&*!:# & H ""& 6/.8&!- &C "!&9I! &+A """&6 PC 7E.8&. &C&3:;; # &+A ""&6//=/ 7 =.8&/0+-&C"## ; 2& +& <7& & ""*& 6 7 > : E 8& **+"*2$ 0 A& / & L A """& 6+ = > E 8&0-3&C&!: 3 A&/ ""&6 ; 8& &-E& " & 9 C& "" & 6 I> E8&/0+-&C3 ; <&& """&6+33"7>.8&. &&& *: <7& $& & 6 H. - 8& * & ""&+45! *& & """& 6 < > ; 8&&!- & C &! & "" & 6 I 8&+ &0&&!:* # & L A "" & 6 E +> +8&0&*;&&*":*; ; & L A "" & 6 E +>/.8&3+&3 &!&!!3:;# 0 &LA "" &6 C.8&+ &0&C&*;:!; 3 =&30& *& " &&O &2&9 ""*6E>.8&** + "*26 $ " ""!&$ " **

#7 2&9 """&6PC 7> 8&&$0&0;:"! 2& 9& =& H & "" & 6 E > <8&&!C*!& * 2&9&2&+2&+- ""*&6 E >/ H.8&!!& $3& 3!5*0 2& 9 22& ""& 6& < C8**+"* 28 $ " ""!&$ " *

;<<I;/ " ;/" - 30":33" 33":33! 33!: """ #; "*!N4:"!NN ";N4 "#0NN 3 "*N4";NN "!*N4 "3NN "! "* #; " 0 ";# " " # 9 "0 " 3 L ""; "* H " "!! H+ " * "!!! "; "* C C ""0 " "3 " EL " # "# N M : & NNM : C>I9 => 2&<7 ""* $2 "" $ " ""!&$ " *!

30": 30! "& 30!:33" 33":33! ;/" B Q 33!: """ 30": 303 " " & "& 33": 33!: 30": 33": 33!: 30": 33": 33! """ 303 33! """ 303 33! #; J3C JKC J4 JKL JC 3 3 J J4 J33 JC4 JC J4L "! " 3 "! "*; "# " #; "3 "* "* "# " "33 " ; " "!3 9 "" "; "; "! " " * " 3 "!; " "" L ""3 "*; H " * "3 H+ "; "; "* " * " "* " ; " * "* ""0 " * " "*0 " 0 "* "# "3 " C ""* "*; C " ""! " ; "! EL " "! "# " " "# "0 "*; #; " "* "0; " "! " " ; "* "# " " " " "# A " "** "0 " * " 3 "# "*# "#; C>I9 +>A ""* "A95 JJ$ $2 """ $2 "" 33!: """ 2&2&2 ""* $ " ""!&$ " *#

;/"!& Q "& " 30":30! 30!:33" 33":33! 33!: """ 33":33# 30":30! 30!:33" 33":33! 33!: """ 33:33; "! " 3 "! "*; #; "3 "* "* "# 9 "* "; JC " * JC " " " "# " " "*3 L " H " "0 "! "" H+ " * J " J " "* " " "* " ; "* "* " * J " J3 " " * "* " " " C " C "!3 "# EL " JK " * JM "#3 "!3 " " * "! " ; "! #; "# J4 "; JK3 "3; "# " "* "* "0; "!0 "* J "*! JC "! "# "* "*# " 0 "! "!3 A "* J "* J4 ";0 "! ""3 "0 " " C>I9 +> JJ3$ V "" $2 "" "" A ""* $ " ""!&$ " *;

;3/!& " " & "& " 33": 33! 33!: """ 33": 33! 33!: """ 33": 33! 33!: """ " " " " "3 ";# "!; " 3 L " " * "!# "3! H+ " ; "! "; ";# " "* "0 " "## ";; "# "* A " 3 "# C " ; "!* " ;! EL " "# E "! "0!* *0 "! " C>I9 +>$2 """ A "" $ " ""!&$ " *0

;<<I./5 & :2&9 """!!!3 :2&9&=&H&& "" &6E> <8&< C*!& "" 4 &! 3 3 9 *: 2& 9& 2& +& 2& +- ""*& 6 E >/ H.8& & $ 3& *4 ""*& 3!5*0!!!3 : && & "" & 6 C < 8& < & C*& "" 4& 3!:&H "" &6.8&E +& 3 #:2&+&<7&& & ""*&67 : E 8& + :#0& &!0:; */:< : 6=> :* * ;: A& ""& 6 ; 8& &-E& 3*3 0: & ""& & +V 5 & 6> & 8&/& 0: 3A "" 3*3 $ " ""!&$ " *3

;<<I/ * This is the questionnaire that the egep Study Group is submitting in order to gather the data necessary for testing the Economic Model which is one of the three main line of activity of the project. Your contribution in filling this questionnaire is fundamental in supporting egep work. Both we as the contractor and the Commission financing this project are fully aware of the methodological/conceptual and practical problems entailed in gathering the information required. In light of these difficulties it is clear that our objective is not to produce figures that can be considered ias official statistics. We do ask you to signal the difficulties and limitation of the data you provide to us but also to make an effort to give us any type of data that we could use to test our model. The information gathered through the questionnaire will be processed by the egep Study Group and will subsequently be discussed and integrated by the EU partners on the occasion of the 3 rd workshop which will be held in November. The outcome of the final analysis will then be published on a web site specifically created for the project s participants to share information. For additional information on completion of this questionnaire please contact: Prof. Marcella Corsi mcorsi@luiss.it Dott. Andrea Gumina agumina@luiss.it. Back-office Reorganisation Effect.2 Please enter the number of employees in your institution absolute value:.. Please enter the number of employees directly involved in delivering e- Government services absolute value:.3 Staff composition. Please divide your staff by category. Enter data for the last 4 years. Managers Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year Officers $ " ""!&$ " "

2. Ricardo s Effect 2. Cost of staff 2.. Please specify how the average salary has changed in the last four years in the organization units which deliver e-government services. Enter yearly data absolute value for the last four years by staff category. Managers Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year Officers 2..2 Please specify how the average salary has changed in the last four years within your institution as a whole. Enter yearly data absolute value for the last four years by staff category. Managers Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year Officers 2.2 Cost of hardware 35 2.2. Please specify the amount of investments in hardware made by your institution to deliver e- Government services in the last four years. Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year 2.2.2 Please specify the amount of investments for replacement percentage. Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year 2.3 Cost of software 36 35 This segment includes the following types of hardware for IT/IS purposes: $ " ""!&$ " PCs desktops and Portable PCs laptops notebooks; Servers; Mainframes; Other peripherals printers scanners fax machines etc. 36 System Software Operating systems OS such as Windows Linux Unix etc; Application Software Off-the-shelf and/or customised Applications.

2.3. Please specify the amount of investments in software made by your institution to deliver e- Government services in the last four years. Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year 2.3.2 Please specify the amount of investments for software replacement percentage Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year 2.4 Cost of consulting 2.4. Please specify the amount of investments in consulting made by your institution to deliver e-government services in the last four years. Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year 2.5 Cost of training 2.5. Please specify the amount of investments in training made by your institution to deliver e- Government services in the last four years. Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year 3. Smith s effect 3. Impact on financial revenues of the institution 3.. New financial resources Please specify if e-government services have brought to an increase in the institution s capacity to acquire resources in the form of Increase of collected taxes in absolute value yes/no Increase of taxes/tariffs on services yes/no of euros of euros Revenues from services which did not exist in the past yes/no of euros 3..2 Managing and coordinating financial resources $ " ""!&$ "

Please specify if the introduction of e-government services has improved the management of the Public Administration budget: Improvement in the control of the expenditure flows yes/no Improvement in the coordination between spending commitments and payments yes/no 4. Service specific questionnaire 4. Please enter up to five e-government services which your institution offers and considers the most strategic ones. Service Service 2 Service 3 Service 4 Service 5 Please answer to the following questions referring to each of the e-government service you provide. Service 4.2 Savings investments and reallocations of resources which are linked to the above services 4.2. Cost savings. Please specify if the service has generated a saving on: operational costs due to the service delivery yes/no staff costs yes/no time needed to deal with dossiers yes/no of euros of euros of euros average waiting time by different type of constituency yes/no of euros 4.2.2 Additional investment. Please specify the financial investment which was needed to deliver this service introducing new technologies. Euros $ " ""!&$ " *

4.2.3 Reallocation of human resources HR. Please specify how the composition of the organization unit in charge of the service delivery has changed in the last four years: Enter the number of external HR which have been acquired for that purpose Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year Enter the number of HR who have been transferred to the organization unit within your institution Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year Enter the number of HR who have been transferred from the organization unit to another organization unit in the same institution because they were in excess. Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year Enter the number of HR which have been dismissed. Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year 4.2.4. Variation in time efficiency. Please specify if adopting an e-government approach in delivering this service has increased the efficiency of its delivery. Yes/no 4.2.4. If yes please quantify the amount of files yearly dealt with by register numbers. Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year 4.2.4.2 If possible provide comparable data about a service delivered traditionally Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year $ " ""!&$ "

Service 2 4.2 Savings investments and reallocations of resources which are linked to the above services 4.2. Cost savings. Please specify if the service has generated a saving on: operational costs due to the service delivery yes/no staff costs yes/no time needed to deal with dossiers yes/no of euros of euros of euros average waiting time by different type of constituency yes/no of euros 4.2.2 Additional investment. Please specify the financial investment which was needed to deliver this service introducing new technologies. Euros 4.2.3 Reallocation of human resources HR. Please specify how the composition of the organization unit in charge of the service delivery has changed in the last four years: Enter the number of external HR which have been acquired for that purpose Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year Enter the number of HR who have been transferred to the organization unit within your institution Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year Enter the number of HR who have been transferred from the organization unit to another organization unit in the same institution because they were in excess. Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year $ " ""!&$ "! Enter the number of HR which have been dismissed.

Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year 4.2.4. Variation in time efficiency. Please specify if adopting an e-government approach in delivering this service has increased the efficiency of its delivery. Yes/no 4.2.4.2 If yes please quantify the amount of files yearly dealt with by register numbers. Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year 4.2.4.2 If possible provide comparable data about a service delivered traditionally Year 3 Year 2 Year - Current year Service 3 KKKKK Service 4 KKKKKK Service 5. $ " ""!&$ " #

;<<I!/ * &&& H F F O4C F & & & & & FC FF ": 2 & 8 3 D E ; 2 * H #9 :** N 9 N * NN NN. * + : : F NN #9 *! NN NN NN NN $ " ""!&$ " ;

": 2504@ 3 D E ; 2 * H W C #9 C :** N 9 C * C. * +@ C C : C : #9 *! $ " ""!&$ " 0

": 2 A@&3 D E ; 2 * H F #9 & F C :* 9 * C C. * +@ C W : & F : #9 * C! $ " ""!&$ " 3

": 2: 3 $ D * E & * ; 2. * H C W #9 & F C 9 :* * C 7 &! * +@ : : & F W & F " B *! N E= NN F 2&2I I $ " ""!&$ "!"

2 & 8 3 E &* H +@ N * * 5* "5 5 * *5 "" "" "" F > @ & 5 WO4C W $ " ""!&$ "!

24@ 3 E &* H +@ N " " " " * * " " " " " 5 * *5 $ " ""!&$ "!

2 A@&3 E &* H +@ N " " " 5 * *5 W F I $ " ""!&$ "!*

* 2: 3 E &* H +@ N " " " " " 5 * W I J I I J I I J I $ " ""!&$ "!

$ " ""!&$ "!!