Fiscal Year 2004/05 Draft Budget Presentation April 14, 2004

Similar documents
REVISED AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 25, 2016 AND MARCH 8, 2016

Long Beach Water Department Fiscal Year 2014 Annual Budget Summary

MEETING OF THE FINANCE/AUDIT COMMITTEE WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 4040 PARAMOUNT BLVD., LAKEWOOD, CA

FOX CANYON GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY A S'fA'f.E OF CALIFORNIA WAHR AGENCY

Maureen A. Stapleton, General Manager May 23, 2013

FY 2013/14 Budget and FY 2013/ /23 Ten Year Capital Improvement Plan. Board of Directors June 19, 2013

INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY RESERVE POLICY Updated as of May 2014 Policy Statement. Purpose of Fund Reserve Policy

Preliminary Rates Customer Workshop April 10, 2014 Gary Given, Sr. Business Analyst Doug Dunlap, Finance and Accounting Manager

7/25/2012. July 25, Rate Refinement Workgroup Page 1 July 25, 2012

AGENDA DATE: June 21, 2017 ITEM NO: 13. Zone 7 adopted its first two-year budget for fiscal years FY in June of 2016.

WATER AND SEWER RATE STUDY

IRWM Plan Update Quarter 4 Status Report, 2013 Monterey Peninsula, Carmel Bay, and South Monterey Bay Grant Agreement No.

FY 2013/14 Preliminary Regional Wastewater, Recycled Water and Recharge Water Program Budget and TYCIP. Regional Committees April 4, 2013

SEASIDE GROUNDWATER BASIN WATERMASTER SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA FRIDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2006, 2:30 P.M. SOPER FIELD, 220 COE AVENUE SEASIDE, CALIFORNIA

MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT FINANCIAL PLAN AND RATE AND FEE STUDY FINAL REPORT. September 2013

The City of Sierra Madre

COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT OF THE LONG BEACH WATER DEPARTMENT

EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT BIENNIAL BUDGET FISCAL YEARS AND

City of Signal Hill Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA RESOLUTION DECLARING INTENTION TO AMEND SIGNAL HILL

CITY OF OXNARD PUBLIC WORKS INTEGRATED MASTER PLAN DRAFT WATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY. FINAL July 2017

Through: Finance, Legal, and Administration Committee (06/10/15) Chief Financial Officer / Assistant General Manager

Water Rate Study FINAL January 31, 2018

Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District 2018 Operating Budget

Final COST OF SERVICE STUDY SEPTEMBER City of San Clemente

Through: Finance, Legal, and Administration Committee (3/11/15) Chief Financial Officer/Assistant General Manager

CASH RESERVE POLICY ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON DECEMBER 8, 2016

Administrative and Finance Committee June 23, 2011

AGENDA. 3. DIRECTORS EXPENSES Staff Recommendation: For discussion and possible action.

Presented By: L. Carson Bise II, AICP President

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP )

FY 2013/14 Proposed Operating Budget

TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION WATER RATES ANALYSIS REPORT OCTOBER 7, 2009

BIENNIAL BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2016/17 & 2017/18

2004/05 Long Range Finance Plan

Semitropic Water Storage District. Combined Financial Statements. December 31, 2010 and 2009

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Consulting Engineering Services for: Troutdale Water Master Plan

WATER USER RATES & FEE STUDY

City of Arroyo Grande Department of Public Works REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY UPDATE

Table 2-2 Projected Water Production and Costs

2016 Water and Recycled Water Rate Study PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 12, 2016

NALDRAFT SEPTEMBER2015 WASTEWATE

Third Quarter Financial Report Fiscal Year and. Mid-Term Budget Update - Fiscal Year June 15, 2015

COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT OF THE LONG BEACH WATER DEPARTMENT (A Department of the City of Long Beach, California)

July 1, Tier Percent of Allocation Cost per ccf $0.91 $1.27 $2.86 $4.80 $ % % % % 201+%

Alameda County Water District. Financial Workshop Proposed Rates & Charges

Rate Structure Administrative Procedures Handbook FY 2017/18

Great Lakes Water Authority/ Detroit Water and Sewerage Department Five-year Financial Forecast Cash Basis. July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2020

Rate Structure Administrative Procedures Handbook FY 2018/19

bae urban economics Memorandum Fee Analysis for General Plan Update Cost Recovery and for General Plan Implementation

Study Workshops are designed to be both educational and to seek broad direction from the Board

March 7, 2019 OFFICERS COMMISSIONERS

Surcharges and Surcredits

OPERATING BUDGET. Fiscal Year Dedicated to Satisfying our Community s Water Needs. MesaWater.org. Mesa Water District, Costa Mesa, California

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Long Range Financial Plan

City of San Juan Capistrano FY 2016/17 SECOND QUARTER ADJUSTMENTS

April 6, Katherine Godbey Director of Finance, Coachella Valley Water District Hovley Lane East Palm Desert, CA 92260

WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

(RFP ) Professional Services for Regional Brackish Water Reclamation Program Feasibility Study. Issued: February,

CITY OF ANAHEIM WATER UTILITY FUND. Financial Statements. June 30, 2014 and (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon)

TEN YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST

Metropolitan Water District s 2010/11 Proposed Rates and Charges. Imported Water Committee January 28, 2010

Scope of Work. Water Resource Management in Mendocino County: Situation Analysis for the Mendocino County Water Agency

CITY OF ANAHEIM WATER UTILITY FUND. Financial Statements. June 30, 2016 and (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon)

Central Basin Municipal Water District Fiscal Year Budget and Rates Workshop May 10, 2013

Temescal Valley Water District

Financial Summaries FINANCIAL OVERVIEW. 2014/2015 Operating and Capital Budget 4-1

Progressive Planning for Financially Robust Water Systems

ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, ZONE 7

COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT

Wastewater Utilities. FY Budget Presentation

General Manager s Recommended Budget for Fiscal Years 2018 & Maureen A. Stapleton, General Manager

Operating and Capital Budget. Fiscal Year July 1, 2017 June 30, 2018

SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY RATES FOR WATER DELIVERIES IN FY 14-15

Understanding CAP s Strategic Reserves

SFMTA 2013 Revenue Bond Board of Directors

Water Rate Study Final Report

Long Beach Water Department 1800 East Wardlow Road Long Beach, CA

RESOLUTION 5-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEHACHAPI-CUMMINGS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SETTING WATER RATES

Phase 1: Water Budget Based Rate Structure Feasibility Analysis

Fiscal Year Budget Proposal

Meeting #1 June 29, 2012

Plan of Water Management

FOX CANYON GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY A STAH OF CALIFORNIA 'NAUR AGENCY

Plan of Water Management

La Cañada Irrigation District

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Public Works Commission FROM: Erick Lee, Deputy Director of Public Works

FINANCIAL PLAN REVIEW AND FORECAST

Finance and Insurance Committee Item 8-1 April 11, 2016

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

CITY OF REDLANDS WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY. Prepared by:

ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE. November 27, :30 PM Greenspot Road, Highland CA AGENDA

Appendix E UPDATE OF THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF THE DISTRICT S WATERWAYS IN ST. JOHNS COUNTY

San Diego County Water Authority Special Board of Directors Meeting September 20, 2012

Department of Water and Power City of Los Angeles. City of Los Angeles 4th Regional Investors Conference March 19, 2018

Progressive Development of Decision Support Tools and Groundwater Models for GSPs May 3, 2017

February 14, Attention: Administrative and Finance Committee. Controller s Report on Monthly Financial Reports.

Utilities Rate Advisory Commission 04/21/2010 Item 2 - Midyear Budget Review APRIL 21,2010

Purpose The purpose of the Controller s Report is to provide summarized financial information on a monthly basis to the Board of Directors.

5. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 14, 2018 REGULAR FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING

Transcription:

Fiscal Year 2004/05 Draft Budget Presentation April 14, 2004

Overview of Budget Process Phase I Plan & Organize Phase VI Adopt 04/05 Budget Midyear Review Phase II BUDGET CYCLE Phase V Revise 04/05 Budget Revise 03/04 Budget Phase III Draft 04/05 Budget Phase IV

Overview of Budget Process Key Elements to the Budget Process Strategic Plan 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan Engineering Survey Report

Overview of Mid Year Budget Review

Overview of Mid Year Budget Review 03/04 MID YEAR REVIEW PROCESS The Finance Department set expectations by setting a timeline for staff with deadlines for deliverables to the Finance Department. October / November - Finance introduced the staff to monthly budget vs. actual financial statements. December 23, 2003 First Pre-Budget staff workshop: Purpose to communicate process and expectations to the staff January Mid Year budget Interviews with Project/Program Managers.

Overview of Mid Year Budget Review 2 nd 6 months Projections 1 st 6 months Actual Financial Data 12 Month Projected Actual Examined Open Purchase Orders Analyzed Board Minutes For Approved Agreements Reviewed Contract Database

Overview of Mid Year Budget Review 03/04 MID YEAR REVIEW PROCESS Timeline (continued): February 19 Midyear budget review presentation to the Finance Committee. Early March With direction from the Finance Committee, the Finance Department conducted interviews with the project/program mangers relating to their 04/05 needs. Mid March Finance developed a prioritized 04/05 budget document for review by the General Manager and District staff.

Overview of Mid Year Budget Review 03/04 MID YEAR REVIEW PROCESS Timeline (continued): April 2 Present the 04/05 budget document to the Finance Committee. Early April Work with management to refine the 04/05 draft budget document. April 14 Present the 04/05 budget document to the Board.

04/05 Budget Discipline

04/05 BUDGET DISCIPLINE During Phase I of the process, the Finance Department developed and distributed an annual budget guide to assist staff in preparing for the Midyear Budget Review and the 04/05 budget process. The Finance Department conducted interviews with the individual project/program managers to obtain their 04/05 budget estimates. Finance compiled the budget estimates and calculated an assessment rate needed to fund District activities for fiscal 04/05.

04/05 BUDGET DISCIPLINE We compared the calculated assessment rate with prior year s assessment of $115 in order to evaluate the propriety of our 04/05 estimate. Finance subsequently met with the General Manager and the Managers of each department to review and revise initial budget estimates. We will present the items which were deferred from this year s budget at the end of the presentation of the District s expenditures.

04/05 Budget Presentation 03/04 Projected Actual 04/05 Proposed Budget - = Fluctuation Explanation of Significant Fluctuations

04/05 District Summary [A] [B] [C] [D] = [C]-[B] 2003/04 2004/05 Change from Project/ 2003/04 Projected Proposed Projected Program # Description Budget Actual Budget to Proposed 000 01 02 04 05 06 10 11A 11B 16 18 23 000 000 Replenishment Assessment $ 29,957,500 $ 29,430,631 $ 32,593,433 $ 3,162,802 LJVWTF Revenue/MWD Subsidy/OCWD $ 2,244,569 $ - $ 2,300,300 $ 2,300,300 Desalter Revenues/MWD Subsidy $ 1,947,000 $ 1,596,135 $ 1,596,135 $ (0) Other Revenues and Expenses $ 434,000 $ 693,111 $ 306,559 $ (386,552) Total Revenue $ 34,583,069 $ 31,719,877 $ 36,796,427 $ 5,076,550 Water Purchases $ 25,808,160 $ 21,759,488 $ 24,978,074 $ 3,218,586 Water Supply $ 3,073,576 $ 706,537 $ 3,092,866 $ 2,386,329 Robert W. Goldsworthy Desalter $ 1,178,181 $ 1,027,390 $ 953,447 $ (73,943) Montebello Forebay Recycled Water $ 477,169 $ 362,534 $ 359,104 $ (3,431) Groundwater Resource Planning $ 222,780 $ 279,454 $ 240,467 $ (38,987) Water Quality Improvement Program $ 452,872 $ 303,754 $ 283,416 $ (20,338) Geographic Information Systems (GIS) $ 196,337 $ 198,106 $ 161,643 $ (36,463) Groundwater Monitoring $ 571,450 $ 608,108 $ 574,180 $ (33,928) Hydrogeology Program $ 428,155 $ 387,068 $ 324,148 $ (62,920) Seawater Barrier Program $ 179,173 $ 131,889 $ 262,634 $ 130,746 Dominguez Gap Barrier Recycled Water $ 463,162 $ 266,345 $ 356,340 $ 89,995 Replenishment Operations $ 216,553 $ 157,693 $ 86,031 $ (71,663) Board of Directors $ 571,941 $ 682,725 $ 814,078 $ 131,353 General Manager $ 347,923 $ 505,254 $ 271,786 $ (233,468) 000 Finance & Administration $ 3,462,833 $ 3,514,455 $ 4,024,510 $ 510,054 Total Operating Expenditures $ 37,650,265 $ 30,890,800 $ 36,782,724 $ 5,891,924 Changes in Net Assets before CIP Exp. $ (3,067,196) $ 829,076 $ 13,703 $ (815,373) Total CIP Expenses $ 11,365,141 $ 4,281,876 $ 3,059,643 $ (1,222,233) Contribution to (Use of) Reserves $ (14,432,336) $ (3,452,799) $ (3,045,940) $ 406,859

Highlights: At an assessment rate of $127.25 the District has a balanced budget with a positive change in net assets of $13,703. We will present the District s 5 year financial projections at the end of this presentation which will further explain the District s plan for long term replenishment assessment discipline. This RA does not include capital expenditures such as the Safe Drinking Water Program. Staff recommends reinstituting the in-lieu program Leo J. Vander Lans WTF scheduled to be on-line in July 2004.

Revenues

Revenues Replenishment Assessment Additional Pumping (Suspended In-Lieu) Goldsworthy Desalter Sales MWD Subsidy Desalter MWD Subsidy Water Supply Long Beach Lease of LJVWTF OCWD Portion of Recycled Water from LJVWTF Other Revenues (Expenses) Interest Income Bond Interest Expense Other (Property Tax & Misc) 2003/04 2004/05 Change from 2003/04 Projected Proposed Projected Budget Actual Budget to Proposed $ 28,692,500 $ 29,430,631 $ 32,593,433 $ 3,162,802 $ 1,265,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,227,000 $ 973,065 $ 973,065 $ (0) $ 720,000 $ 623,070 $ 623,070 $ - $ 720,000 $ - $ 627,000 $ 627,000 $ 1,382,514 $ - $ 1,382,600 $ 1,382,600 $ 142,055 $ - $ 290,700 $ 290,700 Revenues Subtotal $ 34,149,069 $ 31,026,766 $ 36,489,868 $ 5,463,102 $ 450,000 $ 170,624 $ 483,098 $ 312,474 $ (350,000) $ - $ (511,539) $ (511,539) $ 334,000 $ 338,245 $ 335,000 $ (3,245) Total Other Revenues (Expenses) $ 434,000 $ 508,869 $ 306,559 $ (202,310) Contributions $ - $ 184,242 $ - $ (184,242) Total Revenue $ 34,583,069 $ 31,719,877 $ 36,796,427 $ 5,076,550

04/05 Revenue by Type (in thousands) LJVWTF $2,300 Desalter $1,596 Other $307 RA $33,210

Highlights The revenue estimates are based on a replenishment assessment of $127.25 / acre foot. We plan on purchasing all imported spreading water in the first half of fiscal 04/05 to alleviate a fiscal impact to our customers based on MWD s increase in imported spreading water cost. This replenishment assessment does not provide for any increase in the District s reserves.

Highlights: Current cash flow estimates indicate that the District s reserve balance at the end of fiscal 03/04 will be approximately $3.5M. The District will be able to recapture about $2.25M for capital expenditures once we complete our planned debt financing. Based on our projections, the District will spend $1.4M between now and the end of the fiscal year. We will also be able to recapture these costs after our debt financing is completed.

Operating and Maintenance Expenditures (by project/program)

2003/04 2003/04 2004/05 Expenditures Budget Projected Proposed Difference Water Purchases $ 25,808,160 $ 21,759,488 $ 24,978,074 $ 3,218,586 Water Supply $ 3,073,576 $ 706,537 $ 3,092,866 $ 2,386,329 Robert W. Goldsworthy Desalter $ 1,178,181 $ 1,027,390 $ 953,447 $ (73,943) Montebello Forebay Recycled Water $ 477,169 $ 362,534 $ 359,104 $ (3,431) Groundwater Resource Planning $ 222,780 $ 279,454 $ 240,467 $ (38,987) Water Quality Improvement Program $ 452,872 $ 303,754 $ 283,416 $ (20,338) Geographic Information Systems (GIS) $ 196,337 $ 198,106 $ 161,643 $ (36,463) Overview of Expenditures Groundwater Monitoring $ 571,450 $ 608,108 $ 574,180 $ (33,928) Hydrogeology Program $ 428,155 $ 387,068 $ 324,148 $ (62,920) Seawater Barrier Program $ 179,173 $ 131,889 $ 262,634 $ 130,746 Dominguez Gap Barrier Recycled Water $ 463,162 $ 266,345 $ 356,340 $ 89,995 Replenishment Operations $ 216,553 $ 157,693 $ 86,031 $ (71,663) Board of Directors $ 571,941 $ 682,725 $ 814,078 $ 131,353 General Manager $ 347,923 $ 505,254 $ 271,786 $ (233,468) Finance & Administration $ 3,462,833 $ 3,514,455 $ 4,024,510 $ 510,054 Total Operating Expenditures $ 37,650,265 $ 30,890,800 $ 36,782,724 $ 5,891,924

Expense Estimation Discipline When going through the 04/05 estimation process the Staff used the following ways to obtain their estimates: Historical Data One of the best ways to project future needs is to see what we have done in the past and adjust for current information. Long Term Plans Staff referred to the District s Strategic Plan and the draft of the 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan to provide direction for proper allocation of District resources.

Expense Estimation Discipline Other Financial Information We obtained and reviewed all of the following information in helping us ensure that the 04/05 budget estimates are accurate and complete. Existing Contracts Open Purchase Orders Salary and Benefit Information Cost / Benefit Studies Engineering Survey Report

Expense Estimation Discipline When estimating smaller items such as items in office supplies, repairs, utilities, etc., staff used the 03/04 projected actual amounts + 5% inflationary increase.

04/05 Expenditures by Type (in thousands) Projects/Programs, $3,245 [9%] Administration, $5,110 [14%] Water Purchases, $29,054 [77%]

Highlights When estimating smaller items such as items in office supplies, repairs, utilities, etc., staff used long term historical averages and prior year s budget when applicable. Capital expenditures are assumed to be funded by debt issuance in fiscal 04/05. Project and Program expenditures does not include projects relating to the safe drinking water program.

July - September 2004 October - December 2004 January - June ITEMS TOTAL TOTAL Operating and Maintenance Expense acre feet unit cost subtotal acre feet unit cost subtotal acre feet unit cost subtotal WATER (af) COST Spreading Imported 14,947 $270 $4,035,785 14,947 $270 $4,035,785 0 $275 $0 29,895 $8,071,569 Spreading Recycled (San Jose Creek Plant) 9,500 $14.52 $137,940 9,500 $14.52 $137,940 19,000 $14.52 $275,880 38,000 $551,760 Spreading Recycled (Whittier Narrows Plant) 2,500 $7.00 $17,500 2,500 $7.00 $17,500 5,000 $7.00 $35,000 10,000 $70,000 West Coast Barrier imported 3,031 $520 $1,576,120 3,031 $520 $1,576,172 6,062 $535 $3,243,277 12,124 $6,395,569 West Coast Barrier recycled 1,875 $430 $806,250 1,875 $430 $806,250 3,750 $430 $1,612,500 7,500 $3,225,000 Water Purchases Dominguez Gap Barrier imported 950 $520 $494,000 950 $520 $494,000 1,900 $535 $1,016,500 3,800 $2,004,500 Dominguez Gap Barrier recycled 950 $431 $409,450 950 $431 $409,450 1,900 $431 $818,900 3,800 $1,637,800 Alamitos Barrier imported 570 $423 $241,110 570 $423 $241,110 1,140 $448 $510,720 2,280 $992,940 Alamitos Barrier recycled 380 $267 $101,460 380 $267 $101,460 760 $267 $202,920 1,520 $405,840 In-Lieu Central Basin - $ - - - $ - - - $0-0 $726,000 In-Lieu West Coast Basin - $ - - - $ - - - $0-0 $607,500 CBMWD Water Service Charge - - $ 18,000 - - $ 18,000 - - $ 36,000 - $ 72,000 WBMWD Water Service & Capacity Reservation Fees - - $ 49,314 - - $ 49,314 - - $ 118,968 - $ 217,596 TOTAL 108,919 $24,978,074

Water Purchases Highlights We anticipate purchasing all of our imported spreading water during the first half of the fiscal year to avoid the increase in MWD water rates. Currently we are estimating 7,600 acre feet of imported and recycled water delivered to the Dominguez Gap Barrier. However, LADPW has estimated that the amount delivered to the barrier could be up to double that amount for 04/05.

Water Purchases Water Purchase Contingencies Dominguez Gap Barrier water costs could increase by $3 million due to new injection wells. Tier 2 water rates may also apply. Barrier water costs could increase by $600,000 if recycled water at Dominguez or Alamitos are delayed. Imported spreading water costs could increase by $100,000 if purchases are made after January 1, 2005.

Water Purchases Water Purchase Contingencies (cont.) The cost of water does not include any additional spreading water to make up recent lost storage. These potential costs are not included in the current budget and would need to come from reserves.

Cost of Replenishment Water (in thousands) Water Service Fees, $290 Alamitos Barrier, $1,399 In Lieu, $1,334 Imported Spreading, $8,072 Dominguez Gap Barrier, $3,642 West Coast Barrier, $9,621 Recycled Spreading, $622

[A] [B] [C] [D] = [C]-[B] Operating and Maintenance Expense 2004/2005 Increase 2003/2004 2003/2004 Proposed (Decrease) Expenditure Category Budget Projected Actual Budget Over Prior Year Professional Services $2,730,877 $299,578 $2,530,025 $2,230,447 R&M / Materials / Equipment $6,000 $26,518 $95,360 $68,842 Program 01 Water Supply Office Expenses $214,252 $169,875 $238,504 $68,629 Subtotal $2,951,129 $495,971 $2,863,889 $2,367,918 Salaries & Benefits $122,447 $210,566 $228,977 $18,411 Total $3,073,576 $706,537 $3,092,866 $2,386,329

Highlights Professional Services - The major addition to the 04/05 budget is based on an agreement with the Long Beach Water Department to operate the Leo J. Vander Lans Water Treatment Facility. The District estimates this cost to be about $2,222,000. This cost may vary depending upon the unit cost of electricity. Repairs and Maintenance The increase is a result of the annual costs for UV lamps and membrane replacements. Program 01 Water Supply

Program 01 Water Supply Highlights Office Expense Increase is due to the annual CSDLAC residual disposal fee and connection fee. Salaries and Benefits The project is expected to be operating during the ensuing year which will require increased staff time.

[A] [B] [C] [D] = [C]-[B] Operating and Maintenance Expense 2004/2005 Increase 2003/2004 2003/2004 Proposed (Decrease) Expenditure Category Budget Projected Actual Budget Over Prior Year Professional Services $300,000 $231,507 $203,227 ($28,280) R&M / Materials / Equipment $200,000 $169,259 $146,360 ($22,899) Program 02 Robert W. Goldsworthy Desalter Office Expenses $550,000 $532,521 $523,680 ($8,841) Subtotal $1,050,000 $933,287 $873,267 ($60,021) Salaries & Benefits $75,681 $94,103 $80,180 ($13,923) Total $1,178,181 $1,027,390 $953,447 ($73,943)

Highlights Professional Services Decrease is due to a reduction in technical consultants which was needed during the first year of operations. Materials and Equipment Decrease is due to the use of a more effective scale inhibitor. Salaries and Benefits Decrease is due to the staff reallocating their time to other projects Program 02 Robert W. Goldsworthy Desalter

[A] [B] [C] [D] = [C]-[B] Operating and Maintenance Expense 2004/2005 Increase 2003/2004 2003/2004 Proposed (Decrease) Expenditure Category Budget Projected Actual Budget Over Prior Year Professional Services $349,500 $272,896 $229,750 ($43,146) R&M / Materials / Equipment $10,000 $9,091 $19,000 $9,909 Program 04 Montebello Forebay Office Expenses $6,104 $8,235 $11,850 $3,615 Subtotal $365,604 $290,222 $260,600 ($29,622) Salaries & Benefits $111,565 $72,312 $98,504 $26,191 Total $477,169 $362,534 $359,104 ($3,431)

Highlights Professional Services Decrease is due to foregoing assistance in obtaining increase in recycled water usage and the completion of the UCSB Tracer Study by June 2004. Materials/Equipment Increase due to upgrade and replacement of sampling equipment. Salaries & Benefits Change is due to an increase in regulatory monitoring. Program 04 Montebello Forebay

[A] [B] [C] [D] = [C]-[B] Operating and Maintenance Expense 2004/2005 Increase 2002/2003 2003/2004 Proposed (Decrease) Expenditure Category Actual Projected Actual Budget Over Prior Year Professional Services $58,000 $79,287 $87,000 $7,713 R&M / Materials / Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 Program 05 Groundwater Resource Planning Office Expenses $2,000 $2,116 $4,750 $2,634 Subtotal $60,000 $81,403 $91,750 $10,347 Salaries & Benefits $160,042 $198,051 $148,717 ($49,334) Total $222,780 $279,454 $240,467 ($38,987)

Highlights Professional Services Increase is related to application for a grant from Proposition 50. Salaries & Benefits The decrease is a result of staff reallocating their time to other projects. Program 05 Groundwater Resource Planning

[A] [B] [C] [D] = [C]-[B] Operating and Maintenance Expense 2004/2005 Increase 2003/2004 2003/2004 Proposed (Decrease) Expenditure Category Budget Projected Actual Budget Over Prior Year Professional Services $208,000 $158,609 $127,000 ($31,609) R&M / Materials / Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 Program 06 Water Quality Master Plan Office Expenses $40,000 $47,989 $49,900 $1,911 Subtotal $248,000 $206,598 $176,900 ($29,698) Salaries & Benefits $204,872 $97,156 $106,516 $9,359 Total $452,872 $303,754 $283,416 ($20,338)

Highlights Professional Services Decrease is related to a reduction in chromium investigation costs. Program 06 Water Quality Master Plan

[A] [B] [C] [D] = [C]-[B] Operating and Maintenance Expense 2004/2005 Increase 2003/2004 2003/2004 Proposed (Decrease) Expenditure Category Budget Projected Actual Budget Over Prior Year Professional Services $0 $11,146 $0 ($11,146) R&M / Materials / Equipment $1,500 $0 $6,000 $6,000 Program 10 Geographic Information Systems Office Expenses $25,800 $25,340 $44,800 $19,460 Subtotal $27,300 $36,486 $50,800 $14,314 Salaries & Benefits $169,037 $161,620 $110,843 ($50,777) Total $196,337 $198,106 $161,643 ($36,463)

Highlights Professional Services Reduction in professional services for assistance relating to the GIS database. Materials & Equipment previously unbudgeted repairs and maintenance for GIS system. Office Expenses Increase in license and maintenance fees for GIS software. Salaries & Benefits The decrease is a result of staff reallocating their time to other projects. Program 10 Geographic Information Systems

[A] [B] [C] [D] = [C]-[B] Operating and Maintenance Expense 2004/2005 Increase 2003/2004 2003/2004 Proposed (Decrease) Expenditure Category Budget Projected Actual Budget Over Prior Year Professional Services $322,000 $294,854 $307,918 $13,064 R&M / Materials / Equipment $6,148 $29,265 $24,656 ($4,609) Program 11A Regional Groundwater Monitoring Office Expenses $27,420 $49,430 $30,550 ($18,880) Subtotal $355,568 $373,548 $363,124 ($10,424) Salaries & Benefits $215,882 $234,559 $211,056 ($23,503) Total $571,450 $608,108 $574,180 ($33,928)

Highlights Professional Services We are anticipating to increase spending for on-call well services. Materials and Equipment Equipment replacement cost decreased since replacement was done in prior year. Office Supplies Reduction is due to decreased state fees and permits for watersheds. Salaries & Benefits The decrease is a result of staff reallocating their time to other projects. Program 11A Regional Groundwater Monitoring

[A] [B] [C] [D] = [C]-[B] Operating and Maintenance Expense 2004/2005 Increase 2003/2004 2003/2004 Proposed (Decrease) Expenditure Category Budget Projected Actual Budget Over Prior Year Professional Services $191,000 $184,772 $28,000 ($156,772) R&M / Materials / Equipment $15,000 $15,532 $17,500 $1,968 Program 11B Hydrogeology Program Office Expenses $41,609 $36,964 $38,019 $1,055 Subtotal $247,609 $237,268 $83,519 ($153,749) Salaries & Benefits $180,546 $149,800 $240,629 $90,829 Total $428,155 $387,068 $324,148 ($62,920)

Highlights Professional Services Decrease due to completion of the West Basin Inland Injection Study and reduction of zone sampling & aquifer testing. Salaries & Benefits Due to staff reallocating their time to this project to develop the Hydrogeologic Conceptual Study. Program 11B Hydrogeology Program

[A] [B] [C] [D] = [C]-[B] Operating and Maintenance Expense 2004/2005 Increase 2003/2004 2003/2004 Proposed (Decrease) Expenditure Category Budget Projected Actual Budget Over Prior Year Professional Services $145,000 $125,000 $202,000 $77,000 R&M / Materials / Equipment $0 $0 $21,000 $21,000 Program 16 Seawater Barrier Improvement Office Expenses $1,000 $500 $400 ($100) Subtotal $146,000 $125,500 $223,400 $97,900 Salaries & Benefits $33,173 $6,389 $39,234 $32,846 Total $179,173 $131,889 $262,634 $130,746

Highlights Professional Services Increase is due to the West Coast Basin Barrier Project model with DWP. Material & Equipment Purchase of chloride data loggers for intrusion studies. Salaries & Benefits Increase is due to staff reallocating their time to this project to develop the WCBBP model. Program 16 Seawater Barrier Improvement

[A] [B] [C] [D] = [C]-[B] Operating and Maintenance Expense 2004/2005 Increase 2003/2004 2003/2004 Proposed (Decrease) Expenditure Category Budget Projected Actual Budget Over Prior Year Professional Services $395,000 $146,080 $265,000 $118,920 R&M / Materials / Equipment $0 $18,052 $9,500 ($8,552) Program 18 Dominguez Gap Barrier Office Expenses $0 $2,899 $0 ($2,899) Subtotal $395,000 $167,031 $274,500 $107,469 Salaries & Benefits $68,162 $99,314 $81,840 ($17,474) Total $463,162 $266,345 $356,340 $89,995

Highlights Professional Services Increase due to groundwater quality monitoring as required by DHS. Repairs & Maintenance Decrease in repairs and maintenance expenditures of pumps. Program 18 Dominguez Gap Barrier

[A] [B] [C] [D] = [C]-[B] Operating and Maintenance Expense 2004/2005 Increase 2003/2004 2003/2004 Proposed (Decrease) Expenditure Category Budget Projected Actual Budget Over Prior Year Professional Services $20,000 $10,740 $0 ($10,740) R&M / Materials / Equipment $51,000 $23,130 $1,000 ($22,130) Program 23 Replenishment Operations Office Expenses $10,500 $10,101 $10,300 $199 Subtotal $81,500 $43,971 $11,300 ($32,671) Salaries & Benefits $135,053 $113,722 $74,731 ($38,992) Total $216,553 $157,693 $86,031 ($71,663)

Highlights Professional Services Decrease due to the discontinuation of special recharge studies from the prior year. Repairs & Maintenance The District is not anticipating any major repairs as we had incurred in the prior year. Salaries & Benefits Decrease is due to staff reallocating their time to other projects. Program 23 Replenishment Operations

[A] [B] [C] [D] = [C]-[B] Operating and Maintenance Expense 2004/2005 Increase 2003/2004 2003/2004 Proposed (Decrease) Expenditure Category Budget Projected Actual Budget Over Prior Year Professional Services $0 $0 $9,000 $9,000 R&M / Materials / Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 Board of Directors Office Expenses $423,756 $473,049 $517,076 $44,027 Subtotal $423,756 $473,049 $526,076 $53,027 Salaries & Benefits $148,185 $209,676 $288,002 $78,326 Total $571,941 $682,725 $814,078 $131,353

Highlights Office Expense Increased by CPI from prior year due to projected increase in costs. Salaries & Benefits Increased benefit cost due to deferred compensation matching, institution of PARS retirement benefit for three directors and a general rise in medical insurance premiums. Board of Directors

[A] [B] [C] = [B]-[A] Operating and Maintenance Expense 2004/2005 Increase 2003/2004 2003/2004 Proposed (Decrease) Expenditure Category Budget Projected Actual Budget Over Prior Year Professional Services $58,000 $34,715 $0 ($34,715) R&M / Materials / Equipment $1,217 $0 $0 $0 General Manager Office Expenses $26,827 $22,872 $19,100 ($3,771) Subtotal $86,044 $57,587 $19,100 ($38,486) Salaries & Benefits $261,879 $447,667 $252,686 ($194,982) Total $347,923 $505,254 $271,786 ($233,468)

Highlights Professional Services Decrease is due to the District not anticipating the renewal of an expired professional contract. Salaries & Benefits Decrease is due to the costs for a change in management from the prior year. General Manager

[A] [B] [C] [D] = [C]-[B] Operating and Maintenance Expense 2004/2005 Increase 2003/2004 2003/2004 Proposed (Decrease) Expenditure Category Budget Projected Actual Budget Over Prior Year Professional Services $1,345,071 $1,399,048 $1,349,373 ($49,675) R&M / Materials / Equipment $134,860 $120,000 $70,777 ($49,223) Administration Office Expenses $655,372 $677,761 $822,322 $144,561 Subtotal $2,135,303 $2,196,809 $2,242,473 $45,664 Salaries & Benefits $1,327,530 $1,317,646 $1,782,037 $464,390 Total $3,462,833 $3,514,455 $4,024,510 $510,054

Highlights Professional Services Decrease is due to anticipated reduction in litigation fees from the prior year. Materials & Equipment The District is not upgrading computer workstations in 04/05. Office Expense Increased by CPI for supplies, conferences, rents, leases and liability & worker s compensation insurance, Administration

Administration Highlights Salaries & Benefits Increase is due to additional staff, deferred compensation match, rise in medical insurance premiums and addition of temporary labor associated with document imaging.

After the staff submitted their initial budget requests, the Finance Department met with the General Manager and the department heads to review and revise (if necessary) initial budget estimates. Management has chosen to defer $1,106,120 from the 04/05 budget as follows:

(01) Water Supply deferred $366,040 relating to testing and membrane replacement (02) Goldsworthy Desalter deferral of $41,580 for the replacement of UV and RO membranes (04) Montebello Forebay deferral of costs relating to monitoring, special studies and assistance with recycled water issues equaling $172,500. (06) Water Quality Program deferral of 297,000 for monitoring, testing, investigations and memberships.

(11A) Groundwater Monitoring $30,000 for a piece of equipment was deferred to 05/06. (11B) Hydrogeology Program $74,000 of costs relating to zone sampling and consultation services was deferred. (18) Dominguez Gap Barrier deferred a groundwater quality monitoring program costing $50,000 to 05/06. (23) Replenishment Operations $75,000 deferred to 05/06 relating to miscellaneous wellhead treatment repairs and a portion of the West Coast Basin Barrier Project numerical model.

Capital Programs Costs

Project Description 2004/05 Proposed Budget Caltrans Pipeline $ 120,000 Increased Spreading at Dominguez Gap Spreading Grounds $ 60,300 Capital Program Costs Safe Drinking Water Program $ 2,000,000 Whittier Narrows Conservation Pool $ 120,000 WRD Building $ 4,250,000 Total Proposed CIP Projects for fiscal 04/05 $ 6,550,300

Highlights (01) Water Supply & (02) Robert W. Goldsworthy Desalter These projects were completed in fiscal 03/04. (23A) Replenishment Operations In fiscal 03/04 we had a $1.1 million capital expenditure for additional storage capacity behind the Whittier Narrows Conservation Pool. Otherwise, no other significant fluctuations. Directors will get a more detailed look at the capital projects during the CIP process. Capital Program Costs

5 YEAR PROJECTION

Scenario #1 Expenses Include Conjunctive Use Benefits 180 170 160 Reserve Level RA Req'd (conj use) RA Plan 16 14 12 Repl Assessment ($/AF) 150 140 130 120 8.1M 7.2M 10 8 6 4 Reserve Level ($M) 110 117.60 115.00 2 100 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 Fiscal Year 0

Scenario #2 Expenses Include Conjunctive Use Benefits No Increase in RA 180 16 Reserve Level 170 RA Req'd (conj use) RA Plan 12 160 8.1M 7.2M 8 Repl Assessment ($/AF) 150 140 130 120 4 0 (4) (8) Reserve Level ($M) 110 117.60 115.00 (12) 100 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 Fiscal Year (16)

Scenario #3 Expenses Does NOT Include Conjunctive Use Benefits 180 170 160 Reserve Level RA Req'd (conj use) RA Plan 16 14 12 Repl Assessment ($/AF) 150 140 130 120 8.1M 7.2M 10 8 6 4 Reserve Level ($M) 110 117.60 115.00 2 100 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 Fiscal Year 0

What s Next?

What s Next? April 15 Finance Committee Meeting to finalize 04/05 draft budget April 21 Regular Board Meeting to present 04/05 budget as directed by the Finance Committee. May 3 Regular Board Meeting to set assessment rate Mid-June Adopt 04/05 Budget