BEFORE THE OIL & GAS COMMISSION

Similar documents
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

THE HANDBOOK OF THE LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO

Court of Appeals of Ohio

COURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO : 9/14/07

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Appellant-Appellant, : No. 06AP-108 v. : (C.P.C. No. 04CVF )

GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INC., Appellee Opinion No OPINION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOCKING COUNTY

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIRST DISTRICT. Appellant, CASE NO. 1D vs. AHCA NO

Procedures for Protest to New York State and City Tribunals

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT

101 Central Plaza South, Ste. 600 Tzangas, Plakas, Mannos, & Raies

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAEF UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017

COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

BEFORE THE OIL & GAS COMMISSION

COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO FAYETTE COUNTY. Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA

mg Doc 3836 Filed 05/28/13 Entered 05/28/13 10:24:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 11

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

L. RODNEY JONES, BEFORE THE. v. STATE BOARD. Appellee Opinion No OPINION

Circuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. v. : No. 09AP-433 (C.P.C. No. 07CVH-11818) Ohio Public Employees Retirement :

COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L Trial Court No.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. E Trial Court No CR-310

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, STATE OF OHIO

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2007

COURT OF APPEALS TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO J U D G E S

Noble Roman s Announces Second Quarter 2010 Earnings

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 15AP-776 v. : (M.C. No CRB 11939)

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Department of Environmental Protection. Kenneth B. Hayman, Presiding Officer.

Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAL UNREPORTED

In the Supreme Court of Ohio

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 11AP-266 v. : (C.P.C. No. 05CR )

No. 95-TX Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. (Hon. Wendell Gardner, Trial Judge)

Court of Appeals of Ohio

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY Abigail Aragon, District Judge

[Cite as Willoughby v. Sapina, 2001-Ohio-8707.] COURT OF APPEALS LAKE COUNTY, OHIO J U D G E S

386 October 25, 2017 No. 507 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

REESE, PYLE, DRAKE & MEYER Post Office Box North Second Street, P. O. Box 919 Mount Vernon, Ohio Newark, Ohio

BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL BY THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE

[Cite as State ex rel. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation & Dev. Disabilities v. Pub. Emps. Retirement Bd., 123 Ohio St.3d 146, 2009-Ohio-4694.

VIFX LLC By Richard G. Vento I v. Director Virgin Islands Bureau

[Cite as Becka v. Ohio Unemployment Comp. Review Comm., 2002-Ohio-1361.] COURT OF APPEALS LAKE COUNTY, OHIO J U D G E S

Court judgment that denied a petition for postconviction relief. filed by Kavin Lee Peeples, defendant below and appellant herein.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Ohio Board of Nursing, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) D E C I S I O N. Rendered on September 18, 2014

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS. Appeal of -- ) ) The Swanson Group, Inc. ) ASBCA No ) Under Contract No. N C-9509 )

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES FOR REHEARING AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OTTAWA COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. OT Trial Court No.

DOCKET NO. AP ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) This case arises out of a Forcible Entry and Detainer Action that Appellee Rowell, LLC

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. DAVID MILLS, Appellant V. ADVOCARE INTERNATIONAL, LP, Appellee

U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Branch Alexandria, VA FINAL AGENCY DECISION

CASE NO. 1D Roy W. Jordan, Jr., of Roy W. Jordan, Jr., P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellant.

[Cite as State ex rel. Luther v. Ford Motor Co., Batavia Transmission Plant, 113 Ohio St.3d 144, 2007-Ohio-1250.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY CASE NO O P I N I O N

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS. Appeal of -- ) ) Fireman's Fund Insurance Company ) ASBCA No ) Under Contract No. N D-0037 )

Robert Patel v. Meridian Health Systems Inc

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiffs-Appellants : C.A. CASE NO vs. : T.C. CASE NO. 03CV5624

2859 Aaronwood Avenue, NE 11th Floor State Office Building 615 West Superior Avenue Massillon, Ohio Cleveland, Ohio

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

[Cite as Presutti v. Pyrotechnics by Presutti, 2003-Ohio-2378.] STATE OF OHIO, BELMONT COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF OHIO DARYL MCGINNIS

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Kerry M. Wormwood v. Batching Systems, Inc., et al., No. 874, September Term, 1998 WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRANSMITTAL OF RECORD --

OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOCKING COUNTY. : vs. : Released: June 1, 2006 : APPEARANCES:

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE DECEMBER 2, 2008 Session

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

v. STATE BOARD Appellee Opinion No OPINION

CASE NO. 1D Nathan Robert Prince of Law Office of Adam Ruiz, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS. Appeal of -- ) ) SUFI Network Services, Inc. ) ASBCA No ) Under Contract No. F D-0057 )

THE PERMANENT JUDICIAL COMMISSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH (U.S.A.)

[Cite as Oxford Mining Co., Inc. v. Sponsler, 156 Ohio App.3d 557, 2004-Ohio-1547.]

STATE OF OHIO WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT December 8, 2014

0 GT (; 6 z )a 8 CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. John Tarantino. Appellant,. Case No

STATE OF OHIO, COLUMBIANA COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) No. 3:12-CV-519

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

Matter of Jane D. Ritter Revocable Living Trust 2015 NY Slip Op 31303(U) March 31, 2015 Sur Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: Judge:

Commonwealth Of Kentucky Court of Appeals

400 South Fifth Street 111 West First Street Suite 200 Suite 1100 Columbus, OH Dayton, OH 45402

Appeal from the Order Entered April 1, 2016 in the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County Civil Division at No(s): C-48-CV

1. Company/Organization/Individual named in the determination ( Appellant ) Name Address Postal Code

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Transcription:

BEFORE THE OIL & GAS COMMISSION M-I L.L.C. dba M-I SWACO, Appeal No. 927 -vs- Appellant, Review of Chief's Order 2016-158 (modifying Chiefs Order 2016-121); M-I SWACO Facility DIVISION OF OIL & GAS RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, Appellee. ORDER OF THE COMMISSION GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL #927 Appearances: Kenneth S. Komoroski, Daniel Canneli, Counsel for Appellant M-1 L.L.C. dba M-l SWACO; Brian Becker, BriWl Ball, Assistant Attorneys General, Counsel for Appellee Division of Oil & Gas Resources Management \ BACKGROUND On May 27, 2016, Appellant M-I L.L.C. dba M-I SWACO ["M-I SWACO"] filed with the Oil & Gas Commission a Notice of Appeal from Chief's Order 2016-158. Chief's Order 2016-158 incorporates, and modifies, Chief's Order 2016-121. These Chief's Orders required the cessation of operations at a facility operated by M-I SW ACO in Strasburg, Ohio ["the Strasburg Facility"]. M-I SWACO's Strasburg Facility leases synthetic drilling fluids, which are utilized in the exploration and production of oil & gas resources. The Chief's Cessation Orders (#2016-121 and #2016-158) found that M-I SWACO's Strasburg Facility is an operation that "stores, recycles, treats and processes brine and other oilfield waste substances." As such, the Division ordered operations at the Strasburg Facility to cease until MI-SWACO applied for and obtained authorization to operate this facility pursuant to O.R.C. 1509.22.

Included in M-I SWACO's Notice of Appeal was a Motion to Stay or Suspend Execution of Order. On July 22, 2016, the Commission granted a limited stay of the Cessation Orders. 1 O.R.C. 1509.22 (B)(2)(a) provides in pertinent part: (Emphasis added.) On and after January I, 2014, no person shall store, recycle, treat, process, or dispose of in this state brine or other waste substances associated with the exploration. development. well stimulation, production operations, or plugging of oil and gas resources without an order or a pennit issued under this section or section 1509.06 or 1509.21 of the Revised Code or rules adopted under any of those sections. Chiefs Order 2016-121 was issued on April 25, 2016. Order 2016-121 required operations at the facility to cease until a permit under O.R.C. 1509.22 was obtained. Chiefs Order 2016-158 was issued on May 9, 2016 and modified Order 2016-121, by expanding the abatement deadline for obtaiuing an authorization under O.R.C. 1509.22. 1 The Commission's stay allowed MI-SWACO is resume operations at the Strasburg Facility in a safe and environmentally-sound manner. The Commission's stay was "limited" in that it required that: (1) if requested, MI-SWACO would provide the Division with transportation documentation relative to materials taken from the facility site, and (2) if the Division were to detennine that contamination occurred at the facility site, MI-SW ACO would immediately remediate and restore the site per the Division's directives. After receiving the Cessation Orders, and in order to resume facility operations, MI SWACO applied for a temporary authorization to operate its Strasburg Facility pursuant to O.R.C. 1509.22. MI-SWACO asserts that it applied for this authorization under protest, as MI-SWACO maintains that the drilling fluids handled at its Strasburg Facility are a unique "product" and do not constitute "brine or other waste substances." For these reasons, MI-SWACO argues that the Strasburg Facility is exempt from regulation under O.R.C. 1509.22. -2-

M ISWACO In order to resume operations, on April19, 2016, MI-SWACO applied for a pennit under O.R.C. 1509.22. On July 22, 2016, the Division issued Chiefs Order 2016-267. Chiefs Order 2016-267 temporarily authorizes MI-SWACO to operate the Strasburg Facility. This Temporary Authorization serves as a "pennit" for this facility under O.R.C. 1509.22. MI-SWACO has appealed Temporary Authorization2016-267 to this Commission, which appeal is designated as case #930. 2 Appeal #930 is currently scheduled for merit hearing on June 7, 2017. In its appeal of Temporary Authorization 2016-267, MI-SWACO continues to argue that the materials handled at the Strasburg Facility do not constitute "brine or other waste substances," and that these materials should not be regulated under 0.R.C. 1509.22 \ THE DIVISION'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL #927 On February 1, 2017, the Appellee Division filed a Motion to Dismiss MI SWACO's appeal of the initial Cessation Orders (appeal #927). The Division argued that its termination of the Cessation Orders (by virtue of MI-SW A CO's application for, and the Division's granting of Temporary Authorization 2016-267), rendered appeal #927 moot. On February 15, 2017, MI-SWACO filed a Memorandum in Opposition to the Division's motion. The Division replied on February 22, 2017. 2 When the Division issued Temporary Authorization 2016-267, it also sent a letter to MI-SWACO informing the company that Cessation Orders 2016-121 and 2016 158 would be tenninated. MI-SWACO also appealed this tennination letter (appeal# 931). On February 15, 2017, MI-SWACO voluntary withdrew its appeal of the July 22, 2016 tennination letter. Appeal #931 was closed by the Commission on March 8, 2017. - 3-

Appeal #927 JURISDICTION OF THE COMMISSION The Oil & Gas Commission is created pursuant to O.R.C. 1509.35 to provide an administrative forum for the review of orders issued by the Chief of the Division of Oil & Gas Resources Management. The jurisdiction and authorities of the Oil & Gas Commission are both defined, and limited, by statute. In accordance with O.R.C. 1509.36: If upon completion of the hearing the commission finds that the order appealed from was lawful and reasonable, it shall make a written order affirming the order appealed from; if the commission finds that the order was unreasonable or unlawful, it shall make a written order vacating the order appealed from and making the order that it finds the chief should have made. Where an order has been terminated, the Commission's ability to effectively affirm, vacate or modify that order is impeded. This is particularly true where other enforcement orders (addressing the same, or similar, issues) have been issued, which specifically supersede or replace the terminated order. The Commission is aware that the "termination" of an order is distinct from the revocation, voiding or rescission of an order, and that a termination may carry with it different legal consequences than would revocation, avoidance or rescission. However, given that Cessation Orders 2016-121 and 2016-158 have been terminated, and that Temporary Authorization 2016-267 has been issued and appealed by MI-S WACO to this Commission, the Commission can see no just cause to maintain a separate appeal of the terminated Cessation Orders. The issues raised in appeal #927 may be argued in MI-SWACO's pending appeal #930. Likewise, the parties are free to present factual background information at the hearing that may include evidence relating to Cessation Orders 2016-121 and 2016-158, as well as evidence relating to MI-SWACO's appeal of those Cessation Orders. Accordingly, MI-SWACO should not be prejudiced in any way by the dismissal of appeal #927. - 4-

Moreover, while appeal #930 is taken from a Temporary Authorization issued upon Ml-SW ACO's application, the Commission recognizes that it is MI-S WACO's position that the materials handled at its Strasburg Facility should not be characterized as "brine or other waste substances" and should not be subject to regulation under O.R.C. 1509.22. Therefore, at the hearing in appeal #930, the Commission would expect to hear evidence relative to the ultimate question of whether the materials handled at Ml-SW A CO's Strasburg Facility quality for regulation as "brine or other waste substances" pursuant to O.R.C. 1509.22. ORDER Having considered the arguments of the parties, the Commission GRANTS the Division's Motion to Dismiss appeal #927. The dismissal of appeal #927 should not be viewed as restricting in any way the evidence that Ml-SW ACO may present in its pending appeal #930 relative to the issue of whether the materials handled at its Strasburg Facility qualify as "brine or other waste substances," and/or whether these materials are required to be permitted and/or regulated under O.R.C. 1509.22. Date Issued: ~ c.sw4 ROBERT C. SMITH, Chairman W1.) J. BRANDON DAVIS, Vice Chairman ~-r.ar~ BLAKE T. ARTHUR'Y(tJ Oen.odd L. ~\ DONALD L. MASON t1t.rtj -5-

DISTRIBUTION: M-1 L.L.C. (dba M-1 SWACO), Via Certified Mail#: 91 7199 9991 7037 2048 3121 Chief Richard Simmers, Via Certified Mail#: 91 7199 9991 7037 2048 3138 Kenneth S. Komoroski, Daniel Canneli, Via Certified Mail#: 91 7199 9991 7037 2048 3145 & E-Mail [kenneth.komoroski@morganlewis.com; daniel.canneli@morganlewis.com] Brian Becker, Brian Ball, Via Inter-Office Certified Mail#: 6831 & E-Mail [brian.becker@ohioattomeygeneral.gov; brian.ball@ohioattomeygeneral.gov] -6-