TS18 Mitigation Grant Application and Benefit Cost Analysis Development - Support Documentation - Governor s Hurricane Conference 2017

Similar documents
Hazard Mitigation Overview

MONROE COUNTY 2015 LMS STEP TWO: CHARACTERIZATION FORM

Hazard Mitigation Grants. Technical Assistance Session Middlesex County, NJ December 7, 2011

LMS TIMES. Director s Corner. This Issue:

Sources of FEMA Funding

Mitigation Measures: Sound Investments in Disaster Recovery

Emergency Management. Alden Graybill, Recovery / Mitigation Division Manager, OEM

1.1. PURPOSE 1.2. AUTHORITIES 1. INTRODUCTION

A Flood Mitigation Plan for the Non-Tidal N.J. Section of the Delaware River Basin. Warren County Planning Workshop (2 nd Meeting) March 7, 2007

APPENDIX 1 FEMA MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAMS

Public Meeting Impact of Hurricane Irma on Central Beach

Matthew W. Wall Recovery and Resilience Division Acting Director Virginia Department of Emergency Management

Flood Insurance vs. Disaster Assistance. Janice Mitchell FEMA, Region

Public Meeting No. 2 Flood Mitigation Strategies for Central Beach

Mitigation 101. KAMM Regional Training. February March Esther White, Speaker

FEMA s Non-Disaster Grant Programs

Environmental Review and Disaster Recovery

TERREBONNE PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE

2017 FEMA Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Grant Program Public Information Meeting. September 9, 2017

INTRODUCTION 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING 1.2 PLANNING REQUIREMENTS Local Mitigation Plans

WELCOME!! Please sign in on one of the attendance rosters

Disaster Insurance: Are States and Insurance Companies Prepared?

10/5/2015. What Makes a Sound Floodplain Management Program? What are the Flood Problems in your Community?

CITY OF PLANTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM NO

Section 406 Hazard Mitigation

Resources for Disaster Recovery Terry Lunn Hazard Mitigation Division Director

Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Grants

Flood Vulnerability Assessment for Critical Facilities. Molly Woloszyn Lisa Graff, GISP, CFM

Floodplain Management 101. Mississippi Emergency Management Agency Floodplain Management Bureau

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

Winter Storm Jonas Hazard Mitigation Grant Program

Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) Program and Application Overview

Minnesota State All-Hazard Mitigation Plan

Key Fundamentals of Flood Insurance in the NFIP!

Short Course on Floodplain Management

44 CFR Local Mitigation Plans.

ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AND FLOOD MITIGATION

Hazard Mitigation Assistance Guidance

IN THIS ISSUE SPRING FLOODS. Black River, Pocahontas, Arkansas

BUYOUTS/RELOCATION/FLOODPROOFING: REGULATORY PROGRAMS AND EXPERIENCE IN OTHER COMMUNITIES

ADVISORY BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS (ABFEs)

Hurricane SANDY DR-4086-NJ

M1015 Lord Hoole Fema 6/2012

Federal Flood Insurance Changes (National Flood Insurance Program NFIP)

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

1. What s the time period on losses for a structure to be designated as Repetitive Loss?

RECOVERY POLICY

A Flood Mitigation Plan for the Non-Tidal N.J. Section of the Delaware River Basin. Mercer County Kick-off Meeting December 6, 2006

Seismic Benefit Cost Analysis

ANNEX P HAZARD MITIGATION

Handbook for Hazard Mitigation Projects

FEMA FLOOD MAPS Public Works Department Stormwater Management Division March 6, 2018

State of South Carolina Five-Year Floodplain Management Work Plan

David A. Stroud, CFM AMEC Earth & Environmental Raleigh, NC

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Truckloads (at 25 tons/truck) of building debris 90

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

Florida SHMPoints Providing insightful mitigation news and information from around the State of Florida.

State Risk and Insurance Management Association A Workshop About FEMA, Insurance, and The Recovery Process

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Hazard Mitigation Planning

Environmental Review and Disaster Recovery

Role of Disaster Insurance in Improving Resilience: An Expert Meeting The Resilient America Roundtable

Water Levels Preparedness April 14, 2018

Requirements for Mapping Levees Complying with Section of the NFIP Regulations

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION

CDBG-DR, BW-12, CRS and Dauphin County, PA: What do they have in common? 2015 ASFPM Annual Conference

Mitigation Strategies

Integrating Hazard Mitigation and Comprehensive Planning Workshop

CDBG-DR, BW-12, CRS and Dauphin County, PA: What do they have in common? 2015 FMA Annual Conference

Attachment B. King County Flood Control Zone District Work Program

Changes Coming to the National Flood Insurance Program What to Expect. Impact of changes to the NFIP under Section 205 of the Biggert-Waters Act

RECOVERY UPDATE: M i c h a e l A. S p r a y b e r r y D i r e c t o r, E m e r g e n c y M a n a g e m e n t

Volusia County Floodplain Management Plan 2012

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGIES

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

Public Meeting 28 November Presented by: Deepa Srinivasan, Vision Planning and Consulting, LLC Dr. Michael Scott, ESRGC, Salisbury University

Third Appropriation Funding Recommendation

JUNEAU COUNTY ALL HAZARDS MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE. OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE KICK-OFF September 21, 2016

King County Flood Control District 2015 Work Program

FEMA Leverages Building Codes and Standards to Advance Resiliency

Erie County Flood Risk Review Meeting. January 18, 2018

HUD s Environmental Review Process. Disaster Assistance Training 2012 Jerimiah Sanders, Environmental Specialist

Gerard S. Mallet, Local Mitigation Strategy Coordinator FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN PROGRESS REPORT

Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR): Housing Rehabilitation Policies and Procedures

C APABILITY A SSESSMENT

PLAN MAINTENANCE. Plan Maintenance Procedures. Monitoring and Evaluation

Changes to the National Flood Insurance Program What to Expect

February 18, 2005 NFIP-NCEM 5-Year CAP Plan, Sections I-III Page 1 of 6

Skagit County Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan

Simsbury. Challenges Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 356

Federal Emergency Management Agency Update. Jesse F. Munoz, CEM Director Mitigation Division Region IV

Walter Road Jefferson Parish Repetitive Loss Area Analysis

In 1993, spring came in like a lion, but refused

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

9.10 HEIDELBERG TOWNSHIP

SECTION VI IMPLEMENTATION OF MITIGATION MEASURES

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

Transcription:

TS18 Mitigation Grant Application and Benefit Cost Analysis Development - Support Documentation - Governor s Hurricane Conference 2017

Name Entity Your role with mitigation projects Your expectations / project

An overview of the funding mitigation programs available Eligibility Funding process and requirements The application process Samples of the type of projects of eligible projects and funded projects in the past

Benefit Cost Analysis process Worksheet and Support documentation for BCA Application walkthrough BCA samples, by running real project scenarios funded in the past.

What does Mitigation do? DAMAGE MITIGATION REPAIR Investing a dollar now to save four dollars in the future Multi-hazard Mitigation Council. (2005). Natural Hazard Mitigation Saves. National Institute of Building Sciences. Washington, D.C.

MITIGATION FUNDING

Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Competitive cycle Requires a certain amount of completion. Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Severe Repetitive Loss Repetitive Flood Claim Hurricane Loss Mitigation Program (Former RCMP) (State funded)

Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) 404 Mitigation; Disaster Related only Allows Phased Projects 75/25 Public Assistance 406 Mitigation Cannot be use for private property. Recovery Bureau

Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (404) Vulnerable to any natural event, not just declared event Can be used on private property Project can not be eligible under any other federal program Must be cost effective and meet other performance criteria Public Assistance (406) Damaged by the eventsite specific mitigation Located within defined declaration area Can not be used for private property Project can not be eligible under any other federal program Facility must be in active use at time of the disaster

Private Non-Profit Organizations Examples: Medical, Residential Health Care Facilities, Educational, Emergency Utility *If you have been considered eligible for PA, you are most likely an eligible applicant. Government Entities State Agencies Local Governments and Agencies Special and Regional Districts Tribal Nations All must go through the Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group of the county where the project will take place.

Applicant s jurisdiction must have a FEMA-approved local mitigation plan as a condition of receiving a project grant All jurisdictions included in multi-jurisdictional plan must have formally adopted their respective Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) All jurisdictions must participate in the NFIP (communities on probation or suspended from the NFIP are not eligible).

All mitigation measures submitted to the state for funding consideration must: Be consistent with the State Hazard Mitigation Plan Provide a long-term solution Be located in a vulnerable area as identified in Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) Be technically feasible and meet cost effectiveness and environmental conformity The measure must identify a non-federal match (75/25)

Must have priority number and budget (federal share) Must identify how project meets LMS goals and objectives Signed by LMS Chair Applications without a LMS endorsement letter will NOT be processed.

HMGP is a cost-reimbursement grant program All approved eligible project costs are financed by the subgrantee with reimbursement requested from the State FEMA may fund up to 75% of the eligible costs of each project Administrative Costs Project Cost-Share The applicant must provide a 25% match, which can be fashioned from a combination of cash and in-kind sources (44CFR 206.432(c)), and project (global) match

FEMA provides State with initial HMGP funding amount State determines County allocations based on the prorated share of federal disaster funds spent in their county on: Public Assistance (PA) Individual Assistance (IA) Small Business Administration (SBA) State publishes a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) which contains allocations of all designated counties

Tier One Initial allocation of submitted and eligible projects will be funded in order of priority as endorsed by the LMS Working Group Tier Two Any allocation remaining after all eligible projects in any designated county are funded will go to another designated county Working Group with a partially funded project contained in original submission. Tier Three If funds remain after the Tier Two funding process, the un-obligated funds will be provided to any applicant statewide with a project application submitted within the application period, on a first-comefirst-serve basis until all available funds are obligated.

Acquisition/relocation Elevation of structures Elevation of critical infrastructure Water retention projects Flood proofing of nonresidential structures Drainage improvements Localized drainage improvements Flood control gates Sewer backup protection Erosion and sediment control projects Lift/pump stations retrofits Structural hazard control or protective actions Retrofitting wastewater treatment plant Shuttering/wind protection measures Certain paving projects Road Elevation Generators

Conformance with 44CFR Part 201 Provides beneficial impact Conformance - 44 CFR part 9 Flood Plain Management and Protection of Wetlands, and 44 CFR part 10 Environmental Considerations Solves a problem Be technically feasible Meets all applicable state and local codes

Be cost-effective and substantially reduce the risk of future damage, hardship, loss, or suffering resulting from a major disaster. The grantee must demonstrate this by documenting that the project: Addresses a repetitive problem or a significant risk Will not cost more than the anticipated value of the benefits Has been determined the most practical, effective, and environmentally sound alternative after consideration of a range of options Contributes to a long-term solution Considers long-term changes to the area and has manageable maintenance and modification requirements 44CFR 206.434

Communications equipment Monitoring equipment Warning systems New construction Potable water supply Studies only Project for which work commences prior to awarding of grant Emergency pumps Debris removal

Notice of Funding Availability Applicant development workshops LMS Working Group submit priority list to state Applications submitted to state for eligibility review State conducts project reviews State submits eligible projects to FEMA for final approval and potential funding consideration Upon FEMA approval, State begins the project/grant management process

State submits local applications to FEMA up to 12 months after the disaster declaration FEMA s goal is to obligate all funds within 24 months of disaster declaration Program Administration by States Overall quicker state and FEMA approvals.

Pre-construction soft costs Activities such as engineering, modeling, permitting, environmental study, etc. Only costs incurred after Presidential Declaration Date Must be approved by State and FEMA A request form must be submitted with application Cannot include construction If the project is not approved, pre-award costs will be solely the responsibility of the applicant

Any eligible project type under HMGP Funded 100% by non-federal funds Project must meet HMGP criteria Match project must NOT begin prior to approval from FEMA. Requires separate project application

PROJECT MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL

The Grantee must demonstrate (that the project is cost effective) by documenting that the project will not cost more than the anticipated value of the reduction in both direct damages and subsequent negative impacts to the area if future disasters were to occur 44 CFR Part 206, Section 206.434 Eligibility (c) (5) (ii)

Benefits * Costs = 1.0 or greater (Ratio) * Benefits = Reduced Damages and/or Avoided Future Damages The analysis is done utilizing FEMA s Benefit Cost Analysis tool (version 5.3)

BCA Exemptions: Acquisitions under $276,000 and Elevations under $175,000 located in the Special Flood Hazard Area. *Includes Mitigation Reconstruction

Application, Worksheet and Support Documentation Clear explanation of the purpose of the project, identifying the problem. Detailed Scope of Work identifying the best solution.

Project maps identifying the area (location Map, FIRM Map and topographic Maps)

Project plans, if available.

Project s Budget with a break down of every item that is included on the final project cost. Project s Milestone Schedule clearly identifying the stages of the project until completion. Complete project Worksheet according to the type of project.

DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION Worksheet is a fundamental part of the application. It will contain all the information related to the project, necessary to run the Benefit Cost Analysis. It is VERY important to make sure all questions are answered. Every figure submitted in the worksheet, will required good support documentation from a credible source.

MAINTENANCE COST Comes from applicant, estimation of future maintenance based on the amount of hours and materials. Only for BCA purposes. PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Appraisal Adjustment Factor RS Means Building Replacement Value Calculator

PROJECT USEFUL LIFE FEMA default value Manufacturer's specifications PROJECT COST Estimate from Engineering Department Vendor s Estimate Management Cost Administrative Cost IMPORTANT NOTE: It cannot be a lump sum.

FIS STUDY AND H&H STUDY demonstrating risk

HISTORICAL DAMAGES Photographs of the flooding event at the specific location. Street, neighborhood pictures. Pictures of home damages. Insurance Claims and payments Receipts from past repairs. Homeowners affidavits Specific date Specific flood depth Duration of the flood

HISTORICAL DAMAGES Utility Outage Utility control structure Road closures Affecting the area Traffic count in the affected area Loss of wages from residents in the area. 911 phone call records. Expenses from City or County while attending the emergency.

EXPECTED DAMAGES Property First Floor elevation Survey Lidar Others H&H modeling results Existing conditions After mitigation condition Level of protection Preliminary designs

DAMAGE CALCULATION Computes affected properties using Building Replacement Value and the depth of the flooding to calculate: Building Damage Content Damage Displacement Loss of function

Courtesy Application Reviews Courtesy preliminary BCA s Workshops Courtesy site visits for potential projects Technical support with BCA information collection Review of potential projects recommending best program for funding. Work on applications ahead to have them ready for next available funding.

Contacts Program Eligibility Kathleen Marshall (850)815-4503 Kathleen.Marshall@em.myflorida.com Jared Jaworski (850)815-4537 Jared.Jaworski@em.myflorida.com Technical Luz Bossanyi (850)815-4573 Luz.Bossanyi@em.myflorida.com Environmental Paula Catledge (850)815-4575 Paula.Catledge@em.myflorida.com Engineering Claudia Lozano (850)815-4576 Claudia.Lozano@em.myflorida.com