UNDERSTANDING FACILITIES & ADMINISTRATIVE (INDIRECT) COSTS AT GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY

Similar documents
Welcome! Understanding Facilities and Administration (F&A) Costs. Matt Michener

Facilities and Administrative Cost

December Facilities and Administrative Costs Primer The Research Foundation for The State University of New York

Proposal Budgeting 101 Why budgets are more than just a bunch of numbers

Iowa State University Sponsored Programs Costing Policy For Awards Subject to OMB Circular A-21 (2 CFR 220)

Proposal Budgeting 101 Why budgets are more than just a bunch of numbers

Proposal Budget Basics

Frequently Requested Information

Hot Topics In Research Administration

Charging of Direct Costs to Sponsored Projects: Policy

MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING Administrative Policy Created October 2016 Cost Allocation Policy on Sponsored Agreements/Grants

Budgeting. Certificate Program 03/09/2016

Budget Workbook Instructions for Proof of Concept Proposals

Proposal Budgeting 101 Why budgets are more than just a bunch of numbers

Cost Policy on Sponsored Agreements

Understanding F&A Rates. OPTIONAL SUBHEAD HERE Sara Tarkington January 23 rd, 2018

Sponsored Program Budgeting Guidelines

Facilities & Administrative Costs: Balancing Sponsor Requirements and Institutional Needs

System Government Costing. Overview of Facilities and Administrative Costs and Rates. Table of Contents

BUDGET BUILDING. Christy Bischoff Justin Stidham Grants & Contracts Administrators Office of Sponsored Projects

Today s Topics. Cost Principles. Federal Guidance. Guidance Resources. Purpose of Cost Principles. Cost Principles Overview 5/7/2015

APPENDIX FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES MANAGERIAL FINANCIAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2015 HARVARD UNIVERSITY

An Introduction to Facilities & Administrative Rates

APPENDIX FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES MANAGERIAL FINANCIAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2013 HARVARD UNIVERSITY

Salary & Wages Fringe Benefits Equipment Travel Participant Support. BUDGET CATEGORIES (click on image to go to page)

University of New Hampshire Office of Sponsored Research

Proposal Preparation and Submission. Module 3B Facilities and Administrative Costs

COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES RATE AGREEMENT

HOW TO PREPARE A GRANT PROPOSAL BUDGET TAMARA FRANKLIN, ASSISTANT CONTROLLER GRANTS AND CONTRACTS ACCOUNTING JANUARY 10, 2018

Georgetown University Direct vs. Indirect Costs And Allowability on Federal Awards

NEGOTIATION AGREEMENT

The Basics of Budget Preparation. Janet Boyles Pre-Award Services Office of Sponsored Programs

Scope: X Medical Center X Beckman Research X Philanthropy/External Relations

University of Connecticut DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS OF FEDERAL GRANTS AND CONTRACTS. Policy CADS1 Date Issued: June 19, 1998 Updated December 26, 2014

Budget 101 Resources for Building a Proposal Budget

BASIC BUDGETING ERA ELECTIVE

HARVARD UNIVERSITY. Guidelines for Federal Sponsored Expenditures

Basics of F&A: A University Perspective. Alex Weekes Principal ML Weekes & Company, PC

Harvard University. Guidelines for Federal Sponsored Expenditures

Indirect Costs (Facilities and Administrative Costs or F&A)

New Jersey Institute of Technology Number: University Policies and Procedures

Charging Directly to Sponsored Projects Costs that are Normally Considered Indirect

COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES RATE AGREEMENT

Direct Charging of Administrative and Clerical Salaries to Federal Awards

COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES RATE AGREEMENT

Georgia Institute of Technology Fiscal 2018 Operating Budget. Executive Summary

ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE LETTER

Dean s RCM Workshops January 2015

Departmental Base Budget Overview

Dartmouth College. Service and Recharge Center Policies and Procedures. Dartmouth College Office of the Controller

MARYLAND OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

University of Missouri System Accounting Policies and Procedures

Service Center Procedure Appendix to Service Center Policy

For the 2017/2019 carry forward, the grantee elected to waive approximately 50 percent of the underrecovery ($3,734,210 for non-federal employees).

Table of Contents. Executive Summary... Overview...

Budget Reform Update. Paul Ellinger, Associate Chancellor & Vice Provost Budget and Resource Planning

University of Nebraska at Omaha Service Center Procedure Appendix to Service Center Policy

Accounting Overview Training

UCSF Sales and Service Center Policy Guidance and Procedures Manual

Functions at West Virginia University

The Zen of Project Design and the Tao of Budgeting. Brian Lane, OER

DIRECT COST POLICY (DIRECT CHARGING OF COSTS TO SPONSORED PROJECTS) GRADUATE SCHOOL POLICY STATEMENT

Georgia Institute of Technology Operating Budget Summary. Fiscal Year 2017

Table of Contents...1. Letter to the President...3. Financial Highlights Balance Sheet...8, 9. Statement of Changes in Fund Balances...

In fiscal year (FY) , the general fund base budgets by department were as follows:

Working with Overhead Rates and Fringe Benefits

Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Rate A Glimpse Inside the Rate Calculation. April 7, 2011

Cost Accounting Standards at Stony Brook University

Working with F&A at UVA. Caroline Beeman

BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY POLICY

Colgate University Guidelines for Charging Expenses to Federally Funded Awards December 10, 2010

COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES RATE AGREEMENT

ELEMENTS FOR CREATING A SUCCESSFUL RESEARCH BUDGET

University of Connecticut FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF SERVICE CENTERS Policy CADS-3 Date Issued: June 19, 1998 I. PURPOSE This Policy Statement

OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK Financial Overview 0

ALLOWABLE COSTS ON GRANTS February 2010

RESEARCH ADMINISTRATORS ROUND TABLE. June 7, 2016 Health Sciences Center June 8, 2016 Brooks Hall

Advanced Budgeting September 8 th, 2015

ALL FUNDS OPERATING BUDGET FY2017. Institutional Budget Document Page 1

COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES RATE AGREEMENT

COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES RATE AGREEMENT

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS CASB DS-2

Policy on Cost Allocation, Cost Recovery, and Cost Sharing

Georgia Institute of Technology Institute Budget Planning & Administration Policies and Procedures

GOOD Budget Justification Guidelines

Cost Accounting Standards & Disclosure Statement

University Budget Basics

Budget Preparation and Cost Sharing Requests College of Engineering and Computing

University of Delaware Service Center/Recharge Centers/Core Facilities. June 13, 2017

Fiscal Year 2019 Annual Operating Budget Executive Summary

POLICY. Number: Sponsored Research Cost Sharing Responsible Office: Research & Innovation

MONITORING REPORT CHANCELLOR LIMITATIONS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND ACTIVITIES; FINANCIAL PLANNING AND BUDGETING

SUBJECT: Effective Date: Policy Number:

COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES RATE AGREEMENT

FY 2016 BUDGET RUTGERS NEWARK

COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES RATE AGREEMENT

ALL FUNDS OPERATING BUDGET FY2016. Institutional Budget Document Page 1

Presented to the Board of Trustees

MSU Federal/State Cost Policy

Hers Institute Budgeting. This Session Will Include a Discussion of:

Transcription:

UNDERSTANDING FACILITIES & ADMINISTRATIVE (INDIRECT) COSTS AT GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY I. What is the difference between Direct Costs, and Facilities & Administrative (Indirect) Costs? Georgia State University relies heavily on external funds to accomplish its mission as a research university. In 2003, the University was awarded $52.8 million, which represents approximately 12% of the total GSU budget. Our successful competition for these funds reflects the high quality of our faculty and research facilities. Table I Sponsored Program Awards at GSU ($ in thousands) FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 Instruction: $7,009 $6,083 $5,302 $9,394 $11,094 $12,358 $10,328 Public Service: $9,507 $21,180 $8,855 $6,065 $8,380 $12,057 $8,689 Research: $20,581 $37,705 $25,050 $23,342 $27,379 $32,987 $33,780 Total $37,099 $64,968 $39,209 $38,803 $46,853 $57,403 $52,798 Because the University receives a significant amount of federal funds, we must comply with federal cost accounting standards and, therefore, our policies reflect the federal requirements. Costs involved in conducting projects can be categorized in two ways: as direct costs or as indirect costs, which are referred to as Facilities and Administrative (F&A) costs (formerly referred to as ICR). Direct costs are defined as those costs that can be identified specifically with a particular sponsored project relatively easily with a high degree of accuracy. For example, the purchase of a chemical reagent for a specific experiment is a direct cost to the project. Direct costs must be reasonable what a prudent person would spend; allocable limited to that portion of expenses directly benefiting the project; and consistently treated as direct charges. By contrast, F&A costs are defined as those that are incurred for common or joint objectives. They reflect the costs incurred by GSU in support of our research infrastructure. Examples of F&A costs include the services of the accounting staff, the cost of a roof or utilities for a building housing several research projects, office supplies, postage, local telephones, and salaries of personnel engaged in providing a broad range of departmental support activities. In other words, F&A costs cannot be specifically attributed to an individual project. In unusual circumstances, costs ordinarily claimed as F&A might be considered direct. The mitigating circumstances relate to the size, nature, or complexity of the project. For example, although administrative and clerical staff salaries are ordinarily defined as F&A costs, if the duties required for a project are of a highly technical nature, then those salaries might be considered direct costs to the project. Typical F&A costs, like postage, photocopying, office

supplies, and local telephone service might be considered a direct cost if justified by the nature of the project, e.g., mail or telephone surveys or supplies for participants. Principal Investigators determine whether a cost should be direct or F&A on a case-by-case basis, and justifications are reviewed by the Office of Sponsored Programs. II. How is the F&A Rate Calculated? The F&A rates that can be charged to federally sponsored projects are determined through negotiations with the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). For these negotiations, the University categorizes all F&A costs as either facilities or administrative, based on the use codes. Costs for building depreciation, equipment depreciation, libraries, and operations and maintenance are categorized as facilities, while costs for general, departmental, and sponsored project administrations are categorized as administrative. Some of the many institutional resources that are covered include accounting, affirmative action monitoring, animal and human subject protection, computer facilities, custodial services, departmental administration, environmental health and safety, employee benefits, purchasing services, stockrooms, libraries, and security services. Once all of the F&A costs are identified, the total of those costs attributable to the research enterprise is calculated. This total is converted to a rate by dividing it by the total of all costs attributable to organized research (i.e., total direct costs that include salaries and wages, fringe benefits, materials and supplies, the first $25,000 of subcontracts, services, travel, and mandatory/committed cost-sharing by the university), and this is expressed as a percentage. Equipment over $1,000, capital expenditures, tuition benefits, rental costs, scholarships, and all fellowships are excluded, and no F&A costs are associated with these. Our actual and the DHHS allowed percentages for, F&A costs are compared by category in Table II. The DHHS caps administrative costs at 26% for all educational institutions, so although the University can document spending 32.6% of its costs for research administration, it is only allowed to charge 26%. Table II: Development of F&A Rate Related to Sponsored Research. Negotiated Actual FACILITIES: Building Use/Depreciation 3.8% 5.76% Equipment Use/Depreciation 3.9% 6.46% Utilities 1.8% 1.8% Interest 2.0% 2.79% Operation & Maintenance 6.5% 6.41% Library 1.5% 1.52% [Total Facilities 19.5% 24.74%] ADMINISTRATION: 26% 32.59% Total: 45.5% 57.33%

III. What F&A Rates are Applied? The F&A cost component of a sponsored project is intended to reimburse the University for the costs it incurs to support research. Unfortunately, as shown in Table II, even when the standard 45.5% rate is applied, about 12% of the actual costs are not recovered. The University further subsidizes the actual costs of research when non-standard F&A rates are applied. Reduced F&A costs are collected from the State, and awarding agencies often limit the allowable F&A costs (see Table III). When the standard F&A rate is applied, the costs of graduate student fringe benefits, subcontracts, and major equipment are subtracted from the direct costs before the percent is applied. The F&A costs are then added to the direct costs to obtain the total cost for the project. The university negotiates different F&A rates for the different types of sponsored program activities. The different rates are shown in Table III. Table III F&A Rates *Research 45.5% *Instruction 50.4% *Other sponsored activity (fewer facilities) 33.8% *Off campus ** 26% Dept. of Agriculture (majority) 14% DHHS &USDA Training Grants 8% GA State and local government 10% Foundations/Associations (published) 10% * Standard negotiated rates ** More than 50% of the direct salaries and wages of personnel are incurred at a site neither owned nor leased by GSU Where agencies have a policy of allowing only a reduced or zero F&A rate, Principal Investigators should provide a copy of this policy to the Office of Sponsored Programs when they are submitting their proposals to ensure prompt institutional approval. In exceptional cases of great importance to the University, part of the F&A rate can be waived for proposals being submitted to agencies that allow full F&A costs. Such requests for F&A cost modifications or waivers for proposals being submitted to agencies that allow full F&A costs should be submitted to the Office of the Vice President for Research. The written request from the PI requires signatures of the appropriate unit head(s) and dean(s), any written statements from the agency that documents why this should be provided, a budget, and a rationale for the request. Per GSU policy, such requests will typically not be granted without strong justification. IV. How are the F&A Funds Used at GSU? F&A funds are awarded to institutions based on their sponsored expenditures that year (Table IV). There are no federal or state restrictions as to the types of research recovered F&A funds can be used for by the receiving institution. F&A funds need not be spent in the same categories and proportions used in determining the F&A rate. For example, although operation and

maintenance accounted for 6.5% of the total 45.5% calculated research F&A rate, that same portion of recovered funds does not have to be allocated for this purpose. Table IV indicates that in FY2003, with sponsored expenditures of $48,682,319, GSU collected a total of $7,783,471 in F&A funds. Thus, the average effective rate for GSU was 16% of each dollar of sponsored program activity. If the full amount were collected based on the rates in Table III, GSU would have collected $21,448,000; thus GSU uses $13,665,000 of institutional funding to cover the uncollected F&A costs required to provide the infrastructure supporting the FY03 sponsored expenditures. Table IV. Sponsored expenditures and F&A collected by GSU ($ in thousands) FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 Sponsored Expenditures Instruction $4,947 $5,592 $6,354 $7,907 $9,612 $11,747 $11,227 Public Service $4,664 $7,489 $10,209 $7,893 $7,940 $9,341 $10,714 Research $14,563 $16,750 $20,909 $21,006 $18,476 $22,665 $26,747 TOTAL: $24,174 $29,831 $37,471 $36,806 $36,028 $43,753 $48,682 F&A: $3,013 $4,625 $5,478 $5,533 $5,552 $6,966 $7,783 The policy regarding the use of ICR at Georgia State University is to return 50% of the F&A funds to the college that generated them; the college then distributes these funds that can only be used for research-related activities. The remaining 50% has been used to fund various institutional activities including the Research Office, and partial support of the internal grants programs. Thus, a significant amount of non-f&a institutional monies are used to subsidize the cost of research at GSU as these funds cover the 50% F&A returned to the units, the 12% of the F&A costs that the Feds do not reimburse with the 45.5% F&A rate for research, and the 29.5% of uncollected F&A costs ($13.6 million) resulting from the effective F&A rate for GSU of 16%. Acknowledgements: With acknowledgements to Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, and Stanford University.

[For bottom of back page] Office of the Vice President for Research Georgia State University University Plaza Atlanta, GA 30303-3083 (http://www.gsu.edu/%7ewwwvpr/) Office of Sponsored Programs (http://www.gsu.edu/~wwwosp/) Office of Grants & Contracts Services (http://www.gsu.edu/~wwwgac/)