Part II: Your Transportation Tax Burden. by Michael Ennis Washington Policy Center Center for Transportation Policy. April 2007

Similar documents
2008 Citizens Guide to Sound Transit, Phase 2

Sound Transit seeks billions more in taxing authority from legislature Key Findings Introduction

Living Wage Proposals: Imposing Price Controls on Labor. by Carl Gipson Director, Center for Small Business and Entrepreneurship

Proposed state-mandated warranty would increase costs to homebuyers

Sound Transit Districtwide. Report of Telephone Survey Results June 2014

Sound Transit Report of Telephone Survey Results

Policy Brief. Citizens Guide to Spokane Streets Levy & Park Bond. Key Findings

Referendum 51 Gets Us Moving, Safely, Again

Policy Note. Why property taxes are going up. Introduction. Background. The new property tax increase

Property Tax Limitation in Washington State

APPENDIX B TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

Assessing the Impact of the 1% Property Tax Limit

POLICY BRIEF. Citizen s Guide to Sound Transit 3: to increase sales, property and motor-vehicle excise taxes for expansion of regional light rail

Policy Note. Local governments should use performance audits to improve budget accountability and performance

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority

Proposal 15-1: Sales and Motor Fuel Tax Increases

Repor. Capital. Finance. Pierce Transit Seeks Sales Tax Increase. Background. MVET repeal. Washington Research Council January 28, 2002

New look at Ben Franklin Transit finds familiar problems

PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

Cancelled. Final Action

SOUND TRANSIT RESOLUTION NO. R

BEFORE THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

Texans For Fiscal Responsibility

Evaluating Michigan s Options to Increase Road Funding

CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY. Schedule of Sources and Uses of Funds by Subarea. Years Ending December 31, 2010 and 2009

TRUCKING ACCOUNTING and TAX SERVICES

Washington Research Council =Public Policy Brief=

5/3/2016. May 4, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives. Follow this and additional works at:

Seattle Economics Council February 1, 2017

TESTIMONY. The Texas Transportation Challenge. Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority

MONROE CITY COUNCIL. Agenda Bill No

State Business Tax Climate Index

Washington Research Council June 17, Key Budget Actions: The Supplemental Budget

Fayetteville Chamber of Commerce

SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M Select a draft Sounder fare structure change and fare increase for public review and comment

2017 Educational Series FUNDING

PolicyBrief. by Justin Owen and Ryan Turbeville

STOREY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING WEDNESDAY, JULY 27TH, :00 A.M. DISTRICT COURTROOM 26 SOUTH B STREET, VIRGINIA CITY, NEVADA

May 1, Dear Board of Directors:

FY2011 Budget Forum. District of Columbia. October 19, 2009

Regional Fare Coordination System

BRIEFINGS October 2008

STATE FELLOW. FAQs: MANAGING YOUR FELLOWSHIP. Who are my California Sea Grant contacts? GENERAL FELLOWSHIP QUESTIONS

Additional support documents to the resolution:

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority

Wisconsin Budget Toolkit

Thank you Chairman Leone, Chairman Lemar, Ranking Member Martin, Ranking Member Devlin and members of the Transportation Committee.

TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF TASK FORCE COMMITTEE ACTIVITY

SE A T T L E T R A NSPO R T A T I O N B E N E F I T DIST RI C T R ESO L U T I O N 5

Key Missing Transportation Links and Virginia s Transportation Funding Crisis. NAIOP Northern Virginia Commercial Real Estate Development Association

T2040 Financial Strategy Update. Finance Working Group February 9, 2017

MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT:

Peer Agency: King County Metro

2017 Congestion & Freight Mobility Workgroup. Senator Boquist Senator Johnson Representative Smith Warner Representative McLain

State of New Hampshire

Transportation Package HB 2017

Event Entry Form Round 13 CAMS State Speed Event Series Christmas Sprint 2nd December 2017

RESOLUTION NO. R Baseline Budget and Schedule, and Approve Gates 5 and 6 for the East Link Extension

Adopted Budget. December 2014

POLICY BRIEF. By Todd Myers Director, Center for the Environment. October Key findings

Proposition 101 Income, Vehicle, and Telecommunication Taxes and Fees

Presentation by Joseph R. Krier Greater SA Chamber President/CEO

GENERAL FUND Revenues

GENERAL FUND Revenues

MAP-21 Policy Themes and Perspectives

Proposed Funding Strategy for Metro Vancouver s 10-Year Transit and Transportation Plan

2018 Budget Proposed October 2017

Danny Straessle. Public Information Officer. Paragould Chamber of Commerce

Our purpose. Premera is dedicated to making healthcare work better.

Legislative Interview Kit

T2040 Financial Strategy. Transportation Policy Board July 13, 2017

Build Networks Build Expertise Build Capacity. Master Academy for. Civic. Public Affairs. July 25 28,

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority

Transportation Finance Overview. Presentation Contents

KING COUNTY AND SEATTLE MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX BASE PROJECTIONS

Sustainable Financing for Public Transportation

Randy Ort Assistant Chief - Administration. Southwest Arkansas Transportation

Transportation Finance: An Overview

SOUND TRANSIT RESOLUTION NO. R99-14

WPGA Membership Application

BRIEFING. In November 2018, Florida voters have a chance avoid a major

B u d g e t B r i e f

TRANSPORTATION-SPECIFIC SALES TAX REVENUE 23% Visitors Generate Roughly 23 Percent of Taxable Retail Sales

Connected Vehicle Pooled Fund Study Program to Support the Development and Deployment of Connected Vehicle Applications

REVENUE IMPACT OF PROPOSED LEGISLATION 79th Oregon Legislative Assembly 2017 Regular Session Legislative Revenue Office

9 Southward Court Tel: (973) Chatham, NJ Web Site: Fax: (973)

Financial Snapshot October 2014

STATE FELLOW. FAQs. Who are my California Sea Grant contacts? Miho Ligare, Research and Fellowship Coordinator.

Mileage Based User Fee Policy Task Force. Lee Munnich, Senior Fellow, Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota.

RPM Presentation #2. Slide 1:

Georgia Motorcoach Operators Association Mailing Address: 106 Main Street, Brookneal, VA FAX

Pre-Budget Submission To Government. From. The Coach Tourism & Transport Council of Ireland

About the Wisconsin Policy Forum. Preface and Acknowledgments

How Bellingham passed a housing levy (and what it means for Everett and Snohomish County)

TESTIMONY ON PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE DEBT SENATE AND HOUSE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEES

MOVING PEOPLE. Membership Guide. Bus Industry Confederation. Contact

Transcription:

POLICY BRIEF Part II: Your Transportation Tax Burden by Michael Ennis Washington Policy Center Center for Transportation Policy April 2007 P.O. Box 3643, Seattle, WA 98124-3643 888-WPC-9272 www.washingtonpolicy.org

Mission and Vision: The mission of Washington Policy Center is to promote free-market solutions through research and education, and to be Washington state s premier public policy center providing high quality analysis and research for our state s citizens, policymakers and media. Background: Washington Policy Center is a nonpartisan, free-market, state-based think tank in Seattle, Washington, that publishes studies, sponsors events and conferences, and educates citizens on public policy issues facing Washington state. The Center believes that the American ideals of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness best flourish in a free society, which liberates the energies of all its members to pursue their own peaceful goals. Ideas, supported by sound research and promoted through publications, conferences and media, over time, create the environment in which sound public policy decisions are made. Guarantee of Quality Scholarship Washington Policy Center is committed to delivering the highest quality and most reliable research on Washington state issues. The Center guarantees that all original factual data are true and correct and that information attributed to other sources is accurately represented. If the accuracy of any material fact reference to an independent source is questioned and brought to the Center s attention with supporting evidence, the Center will respond in writing. If an error exists, it will be noted in an errata sheet that will accompany all subsequent distribution of the publication, which constitutes the complete and final remedy under this guarantee. Nothing appearing in this document is to be construed as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before any legislative body.

April 2007 Part II: Your Transportation Tax Burden Transportation taxes would climb 24% or to as much as $1,695 if the RTID/ST2 package is approved by voters in November. by Michael Ennis Director, Center for Transportation Policy Every year Puget Sound residents pay an average of $1,303 per household in transportation related taxes. Public officials are asking voters to approve a multi-billion dollar roads and transit package that would increase the current transportation tax burden by as much as 24% per family. The added tax burden from the combined Sound Transit and Regional Transportation Investment District (ST2/RTID) package would be $286 per year for families, increasing the three county average to $1,588. Washington led the country in per capita sales tax collections in 2004, collecting an average of $1,577 per person, annually. If the ST2/RTID measure passes, the added sales tax rate will push the annual amount collected beyond $1,600 per citizen and continue to ensure that Washington remains the leader in per capita sales tax collections. If the ST2/RTID measure is approved, car tabs will climb an average of $68 per vehicle and the average family will pay about $137 more a year for registering a vehicle. Washington Policy Center s new Transportation Tax Index allows for the first time, Puget Sound families to have the economic context to fully understand how proposed tax increases for transportation projects stack up with how much a family currently pays. Washington Policy Center - 1 -

Summary Every year Puget Sound residents pay an average of $1,303 per household in transportation taxes. Public officials are asking voters to approve a multi-billion dollar roads and transit package in November that would increase the current transportation tax burden by as much as 24% per household. The unbalanced tax proposal combines two areas of spending. The roads piece, commonly known as the Regional Transportation Investment District (RTID), would fund about $9 billion in regional road improvements. And the public transportation portion, Sound Transit phase 2 (ST2), would spend about $20 billion more on light rail, bus and commuter rail service. 1 RTID proposes to raise the sales tax in Pierce, Snohomish and King Counties by 0.1% and impose a 0.8% increase in the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax (MVET). Sound Transit would increase the sales tax in the three counties by an additional 0.5%. If the RTID/ST2 ballot measure passes, the sales tax rate in the three counties will climb a total of.6%. In other words, the sales tax rate in most areas of the three counties will range between 9.1% and 9.5%. To put this in perspective, Washington led the country in per capita sales tax collections in 2004, collecting an average of $1,577 per person annually. 2 Further increasing the sales tax rate will push the annual amount collected beyond $1,600 per citizen and continue to ensure that Washington remains the leader in per capita sales tax collections. If the RTID/ST2 package is approved, the average household with one vehicle would pay about $218 per year in additional transportation taxes, or $286 per year for households with two vehicles. 3 To determine how these amounts compare to a household s current transportation tax burden, it is important to identify the various taxes and fees that are measurable and have a consistent impact on a household budget. Household Transportation Tax Index There are five types of public entities that have the authority to impose and collect taxes related to transportation in the Puget Sound. These are the federal government, state government, counties, cities and special districts created by the state, such as Sound Transit and the RTID. 1 RTID and ST2 costs are Year of Expenditure estimates and do not include debt service. 2 dor.wa.gov/docs/reports/2006/compare06/table10.pdf 3 Each.1% sales tax equals $25 per household. RTID calculates $80 for every $10,000 of the vehicle's worth. RTID also calculates the average value of all vehicles in the tri-county region is $8,500. This translates to $68 per vehicle at the average value. Washington Policy Center - 2 -

These groups have a variety of financial powers that are used to support transportation related services. For example, the state has more than 60 types of transportation taxes and fees. Most of these assessments however, do not affect many people and therefore do not have a consistent impact on a household budget. Some of these include aircraft fuel taxes, log truck permits, and vessel fees. Other taxes are paid out of a family budget more consistently and can be measured in a household transportation tax index. They include sales and fuel taxes, annual vehicle registration fees and the motor vehicle excise tax. Until now, it has been difficult to understand how these tax burdens add up in the context of an average family budget. Both RTID and Sound Transit attempt to illustrate their bottom line costs, but without the perspective of how much we currently pay it is difficult for taxpayers to judge the actual burden. Furthermore, the agencies estimates are not always accurate and typically jump between household tax burdens and individual tax burdens. For example, RTID s revised Blueprint for Progress estimates that if the combined package is approved, the average cost per household will be $218. 4 But this estimate only assumes a vehicle ownership rate of one car per household. Since the RTID measure proposes a 0.8% increase in the MVET, the average vehicle ownership rate per household is important to gain an accurate estimate. In reality, the average vehicle ownership rate in Washington is 2.01. 5 This means the true household tax burden for the ST2/RTID package is actually $286 per year. Creating a regional transportation tax index shows how much the average household currently pays in transportation related taxes in King, Pierce and Snohomish Counties, and defines how the ST2/RTID proposal will stack up against how much residents currently pay. Public Transportation There are four county or city public transportation systems in King, Pierce, and Snohomish Counties. Each system possesses a sales tax authority to fund its own services. Pierce Transit and Everett Transit impose a 0.6% sales tax and King County Metro and Snohomish Community Transit impose a 0.9% sales tax. Generally, each 0.1% sales tax cost a household about $25 per year. 6 So the average family in King County pays about $225 per year in sales taxes to fund King County Metro. 4 http://www.rtid.org/blueprint.html 5 RTID estimates a household tax burden based on the assumption of one vehicle per household. According to a report from the WSDOT, Travel Indicators and Trends in Washington State, data collected from the National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) indicates that the Washington State household vehicle ownership rate in 2001 was 2.01. Consequently, this Policy Brief assumes a household vehicle ownership rate of 2.01. 6 The sales tax calculation is the generally accepted model for public agencies and is the same assumption adopted by the RTID, Sound Transit and King County for their financial estimates. Washington Policy Center - 3 -

Car Tabs Vehicle owners must pay an annual vehicle registration fee for the privilege of driving a car in Washington. The base registration fee is $30 a year. Car tabs also include a weight fee, which is based on the gross vehicle weight. The scale is $10 for vehicle weights between 0-4000 lbs, $20 for weights between 4001-6000 lbs, and $30 for vehicles weighing between 6001-8000 lbs. 7 This Policy Brief assumes an average vehicle weight fee of $10 per vehicle and an average of 2.01 vehicles per household when calculating the total annual vehicle registration fee. Therefore, on average, a household pays about $80 per year in vehicle registration fees. 8 Seattle Street Maintenance Proposition In 2006, voters in Seattle approved a road maintenance measure, which increased property tax collections in the city by $365 million over nine years. Seattle households now pay an average of $144 more per year for the street maintenance proposition. 9 Sound Transit, Phase 1 In 1996, Puget Sound voters approved Sound Move, the first phase of Sound Transit. The plan imposed a ten-year 0.4% sales and use tax increase and a 0.3% Motor Vehicle Excise Tax (MVET) and consisted of a commuter rail service, a regional bus system connecting Pierce, Snohomish and King Counties, and Washington s first light rail segment. At the time Sound Transit officials said it would cost $3.9 billion (in 1995 dollars) and take 10 years to complete. Sound Transit now says the cost of its first phase is approaching $15 billion (Year of Expenditure) and they will not complete it until 2020. In addition, Sound Transit officials now say they intend to collect the 0.4% sales tax forever, even after the first phase is complete in 2020. Generally, each 0.1% sales tax reduces household income about $25 more per year and each.1% MVET equals $17.88 per vehicle. 10 Combining the sales tax and MVET, shows that households currently pay an average of $208 per year for the first phase of Sound Transit. Fuel Tax Washington drivers must pay both a state and federal per-gallon gas tax when purchasing fuel. The current federal gas tax is 18.4 cents per gallon and the state gas tax (as of July 2007) is 36 cents per gallon. Fuel tax estimates are based on an average of 7 http://www.dol.wa.gov/vehicleregistration/fees.html 8 It should also be noted that most households pay the MVET in combination with their vehicle registration fees. So car tabs will appear larger than the average of $40 per vehicle listed here. This Policy Brief does include the MVET, but only in combination with the agencies that impose it. 9 A $400,000 home in Seattle would have an increased property tax burden of $144 annually. 10 The sales tax calculation is the generally accepted model and is the same assumption adopted by the RTID, Sound Transit and King County for their financial estimates. The MVET calculation is based on RTID s estimates in its Blueprint for Progress; RTID calculates $143 in MVET for each vehicle owned. As a result, using the average value of a vehicle, each.1% of MVET translates to $17.88 per vehicle. Also assume 2.01 cars per household. Washington Policy Center - 4 -

15,000 miles per year at 22 mpg. The gas tax amounts also assume 2.01 cars per household. This means the average family pays about $745 in annual fuel taxes. The following table shows the current transportation tax burden for the average household in Pierce, King and Snohomish Counties. Table 1: Annual Household Transportation Tax Index in King, Pierce and Snohomish Counties 11 If you live here -- King (not Seattle) Seattle Pierce Snohomish Everett (not Everett) You pay these transportation taxes -- Transportation Taxes Sound Transit, Phase 1----------------- $208 $208 $208 $208 $208 Federal Gas Tax-------------------------- $252 $252 $252 $252 $252 WA State Gas Tax------------------------ $493 $493 $493 $493 $493 Pierce Transit------------------------------ $0 $0 $150 $0 $0 King County Metro------------------------ $225 $225 $0 $0 $0 Snohomish Comm. Transit------------- $0 $0 $0 $225 $225 Everett Transit System------------------ $0 $0 $0 $0 $150 City of Seattle Prop. 1------------------- $0 $144 $0 $0 $0 Annual Vehicle Registration Fees--- $80 $80 $80 $80 $80 Total Annual Tax Burden $1,259 $1,403 $1,184 $1,259 $1,409 Households in Seattle and Everett currently pay the most in transportation taxes, more than $1,400 per year. Pierce County households pay the least, with an annual burden of about $1,184 per year. Combining all the current transportation related taxes shows the average household in Pierce, Snohomish and King Counties pays about $1,303 per year. With an average of 57%, state and federal fuel taxes impose the greatest burden on households throughout the three counties. The state portion of the fuel tax represents between 34% and 41% of the overall transportation tax burden, while the federal portion is between 18% and 21%. Another significant taxing area is funding for public transportation. In Everett, for example, households are obligated to pay for three public transit agencies, which 11 The total transportation amounts do not include local taxes (except for Seattle s recently voter-approved road maintenance proposition) or various other state fees. The taxes and fees were chosen based on whether they could be accurately measured and if they had a consistent or annual effect on a household budget. Washington Policy Center - 5 -

represent more than 42% of their overall transportation tax burden. Compare this to Pierce County, which only pays about 31% toward public transit agencies. Rounding out the field of transportation taxes is the annual vehicle registration fee, which represents between 6% and 7% of a household s transportation tax index. These distributions can be seen in more detail in the appendix of this Policy Brief. If voters approve the ST2/RTID tax package this November, these transportation tax burdens would increase substantially. The following table compares the current annual transportation tax burden with the proposed increases from RTID and ST2. Table 2: Comparing Current Transportation Taxes with Proposed ST2/RTID Package, by Household King Seattle Pierce Snohomish Everett Transportation Taxes ST2/RTID -- proposed (not Seattle) $286 $286 $286 (not Everett) $286 $286 Current Transportation Tax Burden $1,259 $1,403 $1,184 $1,259 $1,409 Total Proposed Tax Burden $1,545 $1,689 $1,470 $1,545 $1,695 Percentage Increase 23% 20% 24% 23% 20% On average, every household in Pierce, King and Snohomish County would experience a 22% increase in annual transportation taxes. Pierce County households would see the largest percentage increase, with 24%, and Seattle and Everett would see the lowest percentage increase, 20%. Conclusion Defining how much households currently pay in transportation taxes builds the context needed for taxpayers to evaluate the impact of the proposed RTID/ST2 package in November. With an average transportation tax increase of 22% per household or an additional $286 per year, residents, for the first time ever, now have the financial context to decide for themselves how the proposal stacks up. Washington Policy Center - 6 -

Appendix 2007 Distribution of Transportation Taxes: King County, not Seattle Vehicle Registration Fees, $80, 6% Sound Transit, phase 1, $208, 17% King County Metro, $225, 18% Federal Gas Tax, $252, 20% WA State Gas Tax, $493, 39% 2007 Distribution of Transportation Taxes: King County, including Seattle Annual Vehicle Registration Fees, $80, 6% Seattle Prop. 1, $144, 10% King County Metro, $225, 16% Sound Transit, Phase 1, $208, 15% Federal Gas Tax, $252, 18% WA State Gas Tax, $493, 35% Washington Policy Center - 7 -

2007 Distribution of Transportation Taxes: Pierce County Annual Vehicle Registration Fees, $80, 7% Sound Transit, Phase 1, $208, 18% Pierce Transit, $150, 13% Federal Gas Tax, $252, 21% WA State Gas Tax, $493, 41% 2007 Distribution of Transportation Taxes: Snohomish County, not Everett Snohomish Comm. Transit, $225, 18% Annual Vehicle Registration Fees, $80, 6% Sound Transit, Phase 1, $208, 17% Federal Gas Tax, $252, 20% WA State Gas Tax, $493, 39% Washington Policy Center - 8 -

2007 Distribution of Transportation Taxes: Snohomish County, including Everett Everett Transit System, $150, 11% Annual Vehicle Registration Fees, $80, 6% Sound Transit, Phase 1, $208, 15% Snohomish Comm. Transit, $225, 16% Federal Gas Tax, $252, 18% WA State Gas Tax, $493, 34% Washington Policy Center - 9 -

About the Author Michel Ennis is the Director of the Center for Transportation Policy. Before Joining Washington Policy Center, Michael worked for the Washington state Senate and House of Representatives and was formerly a staff assistant for U.S. Senator Slade Gorton. Michael served in the U.S. Army with the 2nd Ranger Battalion and has been active in local government affairs. He earned his Bachelor's degree from the University of Washington where he studied Political Science. He also earned his Master's of Public Administration degree from the Daniel J Evans School of Public Affairs also at the University of Washington. Published by Washington Policy Center Chairman President Vice President for Research Communications Coordinator Greg Porter Daniel Mead Smith Paul Guppy Lyndsey Hartje Nothing in this document should be construed as any attempt to aid or hinder any legislation before any legislative body. If you have any comments or questions about this study, please contact us at: Washington Policy Center PO Box 3643 Seattle, WA 98124-3643 Visit our website at www.washingtonpolicy.org. E-mail: wpc@washingtonpolicy.org. Or call us toll free at 1-888-972-9272 Washington Policy Center, 2007 Washington Policy Center - 10 -

Make a difference, invest in ideas. Washington Policy Center believes that good ideas, supported by sound research and promoted through publications, public forums, and the media, over time, create the environment in which sound public policy decisions are made. WPC s plan for 2007 is to continue providing high quality research and forums on: Free-market environmental policy Competitive bidding/contracting out government services Transportation congestion relief Tax reform Health care reform Improving the small business climate The legislature through our comprehensive legislative website, WashingtonVotes.org Education funding Policymakers are increasingly looking to the work of WPC for the development of public policy, most notably WPC s nationally recognized Small Business Project and our comprehensive guide to our state s top issues, Policy Guide for Washington State. National and local leaders alike praise the Policy Center s innovative ideas: Absent the leveling of ideas, politics is nothing but an unlovely maelstrom of scrambling interests. Given ideas, it is an elevating and elevated discipline. And institutions like the Washington Policy Center and its research centers make politics not only more intelligent, but more noble. Columbia Award Winner George Will at WPC's 2006 Annual Dinner Washington Policy Center is an important player in state policymaking. It has earned respect and gained influence with decision makers who want to create a more efficient government. Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers, 5 th District of Washington As a supporter you will receive high-quality Policy Briefs, Policy Notes, and invitations to events, conferences and forums, featuring both national and local public policy experts. For more information, please contact us at 888-WPC-9272, or visit us at www.washingtonpolicy.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes! I want to make a tax-deductible contribution to support Washington Policy Center. Levels of Support $5,000 President s Council Name $2,500 Benefactor Address $1,000 Leadership Council City State Zip $500 Patron Phone $100 Research Circle Fax/Email address $50 Associate Please make checks payable to Washington Policy Center or provide credit card information: Charge my: Visa MasterCard AmEx # Exp. Signature Please send to: PO Box 3643, Seattle, WA 98124-3643, fax 206-624-8038 or visit www.washingtonpolicy.org to join online on our secure website. Washington Policy Center is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, tax-exempt organization. (T.I.N. 91-1752769).