CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
> 4u. In i 33 iw, 1? & iiiii ife!^ I IIIlie * HI. fa-4 I!««: i! . ca? Ron Galperin. Controller

Comprehensive Annual Financial Report

BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE

INTRODUCTION ELECTED AND FISCAL MUNICIPAL OFFICERS

PiKed //FL_ THE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT REPORT FROM. TO: The Honorable Mayor and The Honorable Members of City Council

The Honorable City Council of the City of Los Angeles Page 2

2. Adopt the following factors to be used to calculate the appropriations limit for :

SUMMARY OF SERVICES BY STRATEGIC PRIORITY

CITY OF LOS ANGELES. Detail of Department Programs. Supplement to the Proposed Budget. Volume I

Fiscal Year Proposed Budget

Airports $ 5, ,889 Harbor $ 1, Water and Power $ 8, ,015 Total $ 14, ,903

City of Stockton Councilmember Budget Town Hall Meetings. April 2011

SUMMARY OF SERVICES BY STRATEGIC PRIORITY

Mil. jl U««1Z_ [ yv!xlg* H lt-a.\* 11. *. ^ d ' f. II II B i I. «*«* If ^ r~i i <i m I I Q bf?>5. '. t u MICHAEL N. FEUER CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE:

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF SAULT STE. MARIE

CITY OF LOS ANGELES SEWER CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE FUND (An Enterprise Fund of the City of Los Angeles) Debt Service Compliance Report

Credit Presentation of the City of Los Angeles Richard H. Llewellyn Jr., City Administrative Officer

CITY OF EAST POINT SUMMARY OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING

Detail of Department Programs

REVISED-ATTACHMENT 4 May 30, 2014 FY BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS TRANSFERS BETWEEN ACCOUNTS WITHIN DEPARTMENTS AND FUNDS.

CITY OF BLACKFOOT, IDAHO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

CITY OF EAST POINT SUMMARY OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING

Budgeted Fund Structure

Expenditures & Revenue Summary by Category

THE CITY OF FLORENCE ALABAMA

City of Los Angeles. Community Financial

March 1, Honorable Eric Garcetti, Mayor SUBJECT: FINANCIAL FORECAST REPORT MARCH 1, 2016

CITY OF TONGANOXIE, KANSAS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. Year ended December 31, 2010

BETTY T. YEE California State Controller

RESOLUTION NO

FISCAL YEAR AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAM

INTRODUCTION ELECTED AND FISCAL MUNICIPAL OFFICERS

ji Manager Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Financial Forecast Report

Deferred Compensation Plan BOARD REPORT 16-03

Budget Summary. Fiscal Year

Measure R Oversight Committee Annual Report on FY13 Audits

Annual Report Pursuant to SEC Rule 15c2-12 April 17, 2014

The City of Crystal City, Missouri. Financial Statements, Independent Auditor's Reports, and Supplementary Information.

CITY OF CORONADO. Personnel Authorization and Compensation Plan

COUNTY OF SUTTER COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATION PLAN FISCAL YEAR

Township of Middletown

AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION For the Years Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

6/5/2014. Cost Allocation Overview. Overview (continued) Overview. Overview (continued) Overview (continued)

BOISE COUNTY, IDAHO. Report on Audited Basic Financial Statements and Supplemental Information. For the Year Ended September 30, 2016

City of Miami, Florida

FY Annual Budget: Mobility Solutions, Infrastructure, & Sustainability

California State Controller

WOODS CROSS CITY CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. For The Year Ended June 30, Together With Independent Auditor s Report

Municipality of Anchorage

CITY OF LOS ANGELES. Detail of Department Programs. Supplement to the Proposed Budget. Volume I

CITY OF BONNER SPRINGS, KANSAS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CITY OF ARKANSAS CITY, KANSAS

PREPARED 11/14/18, 14:30:06 ADOPTED APPROPRIATION BUDGET PAGE 1 PROGRAM GM601L FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10/2018

Queen Creek Annual Budget Organizational Structure

Village of Bolingbrook, Illinois

THE CITY OF FLORENCE ALABAMA

The Corporation of the Municipality of Strathroy-Caradoc Consolidated Financial Statements For the year ended December 31, 2017

2002 Adopted Current Estimates

F Y 2017 BUDGET F Y C I P

PREPARED 10/23/18, 12:40:31 PRELIMINARY APPROPRIATION BUDGET PAGE 1 PROGRAM GM601L FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 09/2018

City of Los Angeles Community Budget Day

CITY OF AVENAL CALIFORNIA

LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY RETIREMENT INCOME PLANS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULES

City of Miami, Florida

CITY OF GAINESVILLE. General Fund. Financial Plan for FY 2013 & FY 2014 With Comparative Data for Prior Two Years

FISCAL YEAR 2019 July 9 th. FY2018 Budget Review Committee Adjustments. FY2019 Highlighted Other Funds Budget Summary

Township of Hillsborough

Broward County, Florida

PROPOSED BUDGET

Village of Eau Claire, Michigan. Financial Report with Supplemental Information February 29, 2016

TOWN OF LAKE ARTHUR STATE OF NEW MEXICO AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, AND REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

LAPEER COUNTY, MICHIGAN

City of Phoenix, Arizona. Monthly Financial Report

City of Jenkins, Kentucky

City of Santa Cruz Compensation and Benefits Plan

FLORIDA REPORT COUNCIL MAYOR CITY BMC R 30, 2014 RICK DWYER TERS NC.

Fiscal Year 2005 Adopted Budget

STATE OF NEW MEXICO CITY OF CARLSBAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORTS JUNE 30, 2013

OVERVIEW PROPOSED BUDGET. Richard H. Llewellyn, Jr. Interim City Administrative Officer Proposed Budget April 26, 2017 OF THE

CITY OF ROSEBUD, TEXAS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF

CITY OF ALTURAS ALTURAS, CALIFORNIA BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CITY OF DANVILLE Danville, Illinois. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION April 30, 2015

TOWN OF NEWPORT NORTH CAROLINA ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT

CITY OF RIPON, CALIFORNIA

City of Ocoee, Florida COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT. For The Year Ended September 30, 2016

Please find attached the Financial Forecast Report based on information through December 2017.

CITY OF RIPON CALIFORNIA

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

CITY OF JAMESTOWN, NEW YORK TABLE OF CONTENTS. Independent Report of Auditor 1. Management s Discussion and Analysis 3. Statement of Net Assets 12

City of Starkville, Mississippi. Audit Report. September 30, 2017

The following document was not prepared by the Office of the State Auditor, but was prepared by and submitted to the Office of the State Auditor by a

The following document was not prepared by the Office of the State Auditor, but was prepared by and submitted to the Office of the State Auditor by a

File No BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the First Financial Status Report (FSR) for Fiscal Year (FY)

City of Coeur d Alene, Idaho. Audited Financial Statements

Township of Casco St. Clair County, Michigan

BOROUGH OF BELMAR COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY REPORT OF AUDIT YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

Rental Assistance Division of the Georgia Department of Community Affairs

MISSOURI INTERGOVERNMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION PAYROLL VERIFICATION PROGRAM

Transcription:

COST ALLOCATIONPLAN37 FOR DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT, AND COMPENSATED TIME OFF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

FOR DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT, AND COMPENSATED TIME OFF TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) Independent Auditor's Report Schedule of Department Administration and Support Salary Base, Administration and Support Costs, and Rates by Department to be Applied in Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Schedule of Compensated Time Off Salary Base, Compensated Time Off Costs, and Rates by Department to be Applied in Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Notes to Schedules 1-2 3-5 6-8 9-11

U.S. BANK TOWER. 633 WEST 5TH STR ET, SUITE 3320 LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 (213) 736-6664 TELEPHONE (213) 736-6692 FAX www.sim psonandsimpsoncpas.com SIMPSON & SIMPSON CEIUIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FOUNDING PAIUNER5 BRAINARD C. SIMPSON, C PA MELBA W SIM PSON, C PA Honorable Members of the City Council City of Los Angeles, California INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT We have audited the accompanying schedules of Department Administration and Support Salary Base, Administration and Support Costs, and Rates; and Schedule of Compensated Time Off Salary Base, Compensated Time Off Costs, and Rates by Departments (Schedules) of the City of Los Angeles, California (City) Cost Allocation Plan 37 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 as listed in the table of contents. Management's Responsibility for the Schedules Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the Schedules in accordance with Title 2 in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 225, "Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments" (formerly Office of Management and Budget Circular A-87), which is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than generally accepted accounting principles, as described in Note 1. Management is also responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the Schedules that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditor's Responsibility Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Schedules based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Schedules are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the Schedules. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the Schedules, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the City's preparation and fair presentation of the Schedules in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the schedules. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. 1 The CPA. Never Underestimate The Va lu e ~"

Opinions In our opinion, the Schedules referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the overhead rates to be applied in fiscal year 2014-2015 for certain City departments for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 in accordance with the basis of accounting described in Note 1. Emphasis of Matters As described in Note 1, the Schedules were prepared for the purpose of calculating Department Administration and Support, and Compensated Time Off overhead rates for certain City departments in accordance with Title 2 in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 225, "Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments" (formerly Office of Management and Budget Circular A-87), which is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than generally accepted accounting principles. Restriction on Use This report is intended solely for the information and use of the City management, City Council, others within the City, and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. i~~( d~~ Los Angeles, California March 9, 2015 2

SCHEDULE OF DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT SALARY BASE, ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT COSTS, AND RATES BY DEPARTMENT TO BE APPLIED IN FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 DEPARTMENT/ Cost Center Department Administration and Support Salary Base Administration and Support Costs Rates AGING (Note 2) Balance of Department Special Fund (Title V) $ $ ANIMAL SERVICES 16,403,451 3,993,681 24.35% BUILDING & SAFETY 57,186,381 12,678,315 22.17% CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER CRA, Petroleum Admin., Proprietary, Capital Projects (Physical Plant) Disaster Grants Coordination 1,324,612 255,343 236,288 37,314 19.28% 15.79% CITY ATTORNEY Criminal Direct at User's Site (Proprietary/CRA) Direct in City Space (CDD, Housing Authority) 37,517,058 9,769,637 13,088,066 3,419,343 3,179,284 834,986 26.04% 26.13% 26.26% CITY CLERK Elections Special Assessment Section 8,064,366 859,810 1,067,184 1,968,775 10.66% 184.48% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (Note 2) Balance of Department As Needed Employees CONTROLLER Direct Billed (at User's Site) Direct Billed (in City Space) CULTURAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT ON DISABILITY ELPUEBLO 778,008 582,284 223,843 168,192 3,226,394 2,662,490 851,761 430,997 846,642 512,542 74.84% 75.46% 82.52% 50.60% 60.54% The accompanying notes are an integral part of this schedule. 3

SCHEDULE OF DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT SALARY BASE, ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT COSTS, AND RATES BY DEPARTMENT TO BE APPLIED IN FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 (Continued) Department Administration Administration and Support and Support DEPARTMENT/ Cost Center Salary Base Costs EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Emergency Prep. Policy & Public Info. $ 716,291 $ 629,191 FINANCE Revenue Collections 21,264,482 3,428,791 Cash Management & Street Bonds 829,947 136,319 FIRE Civilian 6,079,230 1,417,869 Sworn (Firefighters & Paramedics) 327,190;665 72,312,209 Field Support Rate, Sworn Only 312,963,113 48,733,239 GENERAL SERVICES Materials Testing 6,310,156 683,083 Print Shop 2,394,867 250,105 HOUSING (Note 2) Grant-Funded Housing Enforcement Internal Administration NIA LIBRARY 49,680,250 8,492,356 LOS ANGELES CONVENTION CENTER 11,638,680 2,696,176 MAYOR Executive/Policy 5,485,958 938,234 Grant-Funded & Special Programs 6,961,339 1,067,282 Direct in City Space 80,050 NEIGHBORHOOD EMPOWERMENT 930,858 2,051,622 PERSONNEL Custody Care (Jails) 4,377,556 878,854 Grant-Funded & Special Programs 233,209 69,471 Rates 87.84% 16.12% 16.43% 23.32% 22.10% 15.57% 10.83% 10.44% 17.09% 23.17% 17.10% 15.33% 0.00% 220.40% 20.08% 29.79% The accompanying notes are an integral part of this schedule. 4

SCHEDULE OF DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT SALARY BASE, ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT COSTS, AND RATES BY DEPARTMENT TO BE APPLIED IN FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 (Continued) Department Administration Administration and Support and Support DEPARTMENT/ Cost Center Salary Base Costs PLANNING $ 18,125,619 $ 7,697,707 POLICE Civilian 157,025,623 23,106,392 Sworn (Police Officers) 842,370,116 257,428,163 Field Support Rate, Sworn Only 830,643,782 259,355,954 PUBLIC WORKS Board Office Direct: Public Services 720,171 44,543 Contract Administration Construction Inspection 20,355,387 2,101,777 Engineering Stormwater Facilities Engineering 3,441,969 805,161 Wastewater Facilities Engineering 21,464,477 5,068,215 Privately Financed Improvements Engineering 7,121,182 1,703,622 Street Improvements Engineering 10,648,372 2,536,228 Municipal Facilities Engineering 11,410,599 2,696,702 General Mapping & Survey 4,324,548 1,049,782 Sanitation Solid Waste Program 73,639,785 4,041,214 Wastewater/Flood Control 102,576,754 3,932,245 Street Lighting 14,934,271 3,843,459 Street Services (Street Maintenance) 64,991,101 7,555,118 RECREATION AND PARKS 109,064,069 14,897,960 TRANSPORTATION 93,724,404 11,061,275 zoo 12,626,398 2,687,642 Rates 42.47% 14.72% 30.56% 31.22% 6.19% 10.33% 23.39% 23.61% 23.92% 23.82% 23.63% 24.27% 5.49% 3.83% 25.74% 11.62% 13.66% 11.80% 21.29% The accompanying notes are an integral part of this schedule. 5

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATED TIME OFF SALARY BASE, COMPENSATED TIME OFF COSTS, AND RATES BY DEPARTMENT TO BE APPLIED IN FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 DEPARTMENT/ Cost Center Compensated Time Off Salary Base Compensated Time Off Costs Rates AGING Balance of Department Special Fund (Title V) $ 2,616,183 $ 493,411 37,334 18.86% 0.00% ANIMAL SERVICES 13,772,510 3,090,128 22.44% BUILDING & SAFETY 51,668,810 11,283,833 21.84% CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER CRA, Petroleum Admin., Proprietary, Capital Projects (Physical Plant) Disaster Grants Coordination 9,036,743 1,899,604 21.02% 0.00% CITY ATTORNEY Criminal Direct at User's Site (Proprietary/CRA) Direct in City Space (CDD, Housing Authority) 73,330,792 15,065,199 73,330,792 15,065,199 73,330,792 15,065,199 20.54% 20.54% 20.54% CITY CLERK Elections Special Assessment Section 3,255,355 107,011 4,570,351 956,537 3.29% 20.93% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Balance of Department As Needed Employees (Note 6) 17,480,463 3,666,144 20.97% CONTROLLER Direct Billed (at User's Site) Direct Billed (in City Space) 10,935,843 2,329,895 10,935,843 2,329,895 21.31% 21.31% CULTURAL AFFAIRS 2,219,941 394,231 17.76% DEPARTMENT ON DISABILITY 867,845 229,949 26.50% ELPUEBLO 642,438 116,272 18.10% The accompanying notes are an integral part of this schedule. 6

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATED TIME OFF SALARY BASE, COMPENSATED TIME OFF COSTS, AND RATES BY DEPARTMENT TO BE APPLIED IN FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 (Continued) DEPARTMENT/ Cost Center Compensated Time Off Salary Base Compensated Time Off Costs Rates EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Emergency Prep. Policy & Public Info. $ 2,080,301 $ 403,767 19.41% FINANCE Revenue Collections Cash Management & Street Bonds 20,650,512 4,745,184 22.98% 0.00% FIRE Civilian Sworn (Firefighters & Paramedics) 17,558,594 4,108,971 264,434,196 33,446,873 23.40% 12.65% GENERAL SERVICES Materials Testing Print Shop 5,215,733 1,029,764 1,956,620 404,802 19.74% 20.69% HOUSING Grant-Funded Housing Enforcement Internal Administration 34,613,100 6,645,084 34,613,100 6,645,084 34,613,100 6,645,084 19.20% 19.20% 19.20% LIBRARY 41,774,398 8,380,257 20.06% LOS ANGELES CONVENTION CENTER 6,051,445 1,304,479 21.56% MAYOR Executive/Policy Grant-Funded & Special Programs Direct in City Space 3,820,414 594,456 2,164,741 368,109 3,820,414 594,456 15.56% 17.00% 15.56% NEIGHBORHOOD EMPOWERMENT 1,386,390 260,259 18.77% PERSONNEL Custody Care (Jails) Grant-Funded & Special Programs 26,849,412 6,337,374 26,849,412 6,337,374 23.60% 23.60% The accompanying notes are an integral part of this schedule. 7

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATED TIME OFF SALARY BASE, COMPENSATED TIME OFF COSTS, AND RATES BY DEPARTMENT TO BE APPLIED IN FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 (Continued) Compensated Compensated Time Off Time Off DEPARTMENT/ Cost Center Salar~ Base Costs PLANNING $ 17,196,348 $ 3,495,695 POLICE Civilian 158,346,840 45,026,572 Sworn (Police Officers) 677,857,693 209,050,404 PUBLIC WORKS Board Office Direct: Public Services 5,214,745 1,028,841 Contract Administration Construction Inspection 20,318,799 4,296,153 Engineering Stormwater Facilities Engineering 52,695,931 11,253,073 Wastewater Facilities Engineering 52,695,931 11,253,073 Privately Financed Improvements Engineering 52,695,931 11,253,073 Street Improvements Engineering 52,695,931 11,253,073 Municipal Facilities Engineering 52,695,931 11,253,073 General Mapping & Survey 52,695,931 11,253,073 Sanitation Solid Waste Program 138,776,072 32,096,040 Wastewater/Flood Control 138,776,072 32,096,040 Street Lighting 12,697,630 2,538,852 Street Services (Street Maintenance) 52,304,479 14,457,993 RECREATION AND PARKS 59,494,660 13,797,630 TRANSPORTATION 71,576,267 17,634,861 zoo 10,390,347 2,138,373 Rates 20.33% 28.44% 30.84% 19.73% 21.14% 21.35% 21.35% 21.35% 21.35% 21.35% 21.35% 23.13% 23.13% 19.99% 27.64% 23.19% 24.64% 20.58% The accompanying notes are an integral part of this schedule. 8

FOR DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT, AND COMPENSATED TIME OFF NOTES TO SCHEDULES Note 1 -Accounting Policies The City of Los Angeles (City) prepares its Cost Allocation Plan (CAP) in accordance with Title 2 in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 225, "Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments" (formerly Office of Management and Budget's Circular A-87). The Department Administration and Support CAP is prepared for certain City departments (see Note 2) to allow for the recovery of administrative overhead costs incurred within departments from Federal and State grants. The administrative costs included in the Department Administration and Support CAP represent the actual costs incurred in fiscal year 2012-2013 as reported in the City's basic accounting system, Financial Management System (FMS). Costs reported in FMS are accounted for on the cash basis method of accounting. The administrative and support indirect costs are not always the same as the City's General Administration and Support Program (GASP). Expenditures are included in the Department Administration and Support CAP if they conform to the following criteria: benefit the department as a whole; are not directly charged to a Federal or State grant; are not direct operating expenditures; and are costs which are not practical to directly bill, even though they might be considered allocable to direct operations. Actual costs incurred during fiscal year 2012-2013 are added to "carry forward" amounts, which represent the difference between the costs theoretically recovered in fiscal year 2012-2013 and the costs entitled to be recovered in fiscal year 2012-2013. The sum of the actual and carry forward costs (i.e., total allocated costs) is divided by departmental administrative and support salary base (see Note 3) to calculate overhead rates for each department cost center (see Note 4). Overhead rates are calculated for "direct" departments, which are departments that do not provide services to other City departments, and for "support" departments with direct cost objectives. Overhead rates of support departments are only calculated for the "direct" components of such departments. The Compensated Time Off (CTO) rates are to be used only when sick, vacation, and other CTO hours are not directly charged to a fee or grant project (see Notes 5 and 6). For employees who charge only part of their hours worked to a grant, their time off is usually not being charged to the project, so the cost of that time off may be recovered using the compensated time off rates. For employees whose entire annual salary is charged to a fee or grant, CTO is recovered as they take their time off, and the CTO rate is not to be used. When applicable, CTO costs should be billed to granting agencies or recipients of special services, either as a separate line item, or as an adjustment to salaries, increasing net salaries to gross salaries. When the CTO rate is applied to net salaries, the amount derived is added to net salaries to create gross salaries. The derived gross salaries become the base against which the fringe benefit rate and other indirect cost rates are applied. 9

FOR DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT, AND COMPENSATED TIME OFF NOTES TO SCHEDULES (Continued) Note 2- Departments with no Department Administration and Support Rates The City does not calculate Department Administration and Support rates for the Departments of Aging, Community Development, and Housing. These departments have been presented to be consistent with the presentation of the City's Central Services Cost Allocation Plan. The Department of Aging cannot recover administrative costs from its grants due to grant expenditures limitations. Department Administration and Support rates are not computed for Departments of Community Development and Housing because they bill their administrative and support costs directly to the grants. Note 3 -Department Administration and Support CAP - Salary Base and Overhead Rates The salary base used to calculate overhead rates includes salaries of line employees only. It includes compensated time off and excludes overtime and unused sick and vacation pay. Line employees are those employees directly involved with the administration of the grant program. Note 4- Cost Centers and Cost Categories Cost centers are determined based on department functions. As the City reorganizes its departments, cost centers are revised to adjust to the City's reorganization. Cost centers are also revised to allocate costs more accurately to the proper organizational units, and to accommodate the inclusion of allowable but previously unrecovered cost. The cost categories are the Department Administration and Support costs, and CTO costs for each cost center, as discussed in Note 1. There were four major changes in cost centers and cost categories from CAP 36 to CAP 37: (1) The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) started providing security services for City buildings effective January 2013. LAPD absorbed staff formerly in the Department of General Services - Building Services cost pool. Since the allocation method remains the same, the cost for LAPD was included in the Building Services cost pool, as there is no Central Services cost pool for LAPD. (2) Liability Claims were reinstated for some departments/organizations. They are included in the Cost Allocation Plan in accordance with the City's Tort Liability Risk Retention/Self-Insurance Program that was approved by the U.S. Department of Labor on June 7, 1993. Specifically, Liability Claims were allocated only to single cost center departments, to the Los Angeles Police Department, and to the Controller's Office. The remaining costs and extraordinary or large claims were allocated to "Other" (an 10

FOR DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT, AND COMPENSATED TIME OFF NOTES TO SCHEDULES (Continued) Note 4- Cost Centers and Cost Categories (Continued) unallowable category). The Liability Claims costs allocable to all departments/ organizations, including those with multiple cost centers, will be reinstated in CAP 38. (3) The City Administrative Officer (CAO) submitted data for CAP 37, and is included in the allocations to all departments. The CAO was excluded from the CAP for only one year, CAP 36, therefore this reinstatement will not affect the CAP 37 carry forward. However it will be "new" in CAP 38, and the carry forward will be adjusted therein. (4) The City Attorney- General (formerly called Municipal) Counsel and three cost pools in the Information Technology Agency (IT Services, Communication Services, and Telecommunications) were reinstated in CAP 37. These indirect cost pools are now allocated by work order and costs can be attributed to the benefitting departments. As these costs are "new" in CAP 37 (having been excluded for more than two years), the carry forward is adjusted accordingly. Note 5- Compensated Time Off CAP- Salary Base and Overhead Rates The salary base used to calculate the CTO rates includes salaries for actual hours worked (without CTO). The CTO cost includes salaries paid to employees who are on paid leave such as: Sick Leave Injury on Duty Vacation Jury Duty Holiday Bereavement Leave Military Leave Preventive Medicine Family Illness Floating Holiday Workers' Compensation (Salary continuance paid by the employing department) Note 6- Cost Center with no Compensated Time Off Rate The City does not calculate CTO rate for the Community Development Department - As Needed Employees since this cost center consists of part-time employees who are not entitled to compensated time off. 11