Listed below is a breakdown of specific project economic benefits:

Similar documents
Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan

Table 2.7 I-73 Economic Impact Summary in Value Change (Alternatives compared to No-Build)

Active Transportation Health and Economic Impact Study

Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Metropolitan Planning Organization (AMPO) Annual Conference. Prepared for

Metro. Receive and File the analysis of the elimination of the monthly FasTrak account maintenance fee.

Economic Impacts of Road Project Timing Shifts in Sarasota County

CHAPTER 4 FINANCIAL STRATEGIES: PAYING OUR WAY

4.3 Economic and Fiscal Impacts

Introduction Project Overview How Express Lanes Work 101 Managed Lane Financial Forecast Performance Comparison Ownership Considerations Transit

Review of 91 Toll Road Funding

Memorandum of Understanding, MOU No. M

California Department of Transportation(Caltrans)

4.12 POPULATION, HOUSING, AND EMPLOYMENT

Appendix O. Transportation Financial Background

DATA COLLECTION. March 15, 2013

LACMTA Presentation Outline. > Agency Overview. > Key Projects / Initiatives. > Credit Profile, Current Debt & Debt Issuance Outlook

NORTH COUNTY CORRIDOR TRANSPORTATION EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY. Funding Strategy to Further Implement State Route 132 Expressway and North County Corridor

Metro. Board Report. File #: , File Type: Budget Agenda Number: 3.

FY19 Budget - Discussion. April 2018

FY17 Budget Discussion

95 Express Monthly Operations Report January 2018

APPENDIX E: ATM MODEL TECH MEMORANDUM. Metropolitan Council Parsons Brinckerhoff

Balancing Efficiency and Equity

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA)

Six Pillars Data Appendix

Demographic Future of the Southern California Region

91 Express Lanes Toll Policy Adopted July 14, 2003

Mike Alexander, AICP Research and Analytics Division Manager Atlanta Regional Commission

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

I-44/US-75 Interchange and Related Improvements on I-44 in Tulsa County

ACTION ELEMENT CONCLUSIONS

STATUS In Progress - Programmed FEDERAL Local Fund $0 $0 $0 $13,041 $13, TAP CL STBG $0 $0 $0 $247,789 $247,789

Florida Transportation Commission PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (P3)

Metro VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION. January 10, Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) System

Regional Connector Transit Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Draft Environmental Impact Report APPENDIX HH FINANCIAL ANALYSIS REPORT

Transportation Infrastructure Investment Will Stimulate Florida s Sluggish Economy and Increase Productivity

Transportation Priorities for North Carolina

Transportation Committee Meeting

Sacramento Transportation Authority Sacramento Abandoned Vehicle Service Authority. Final Budget. Fiscal Year 2015/16

Planning a Regional Express Lane Network Lessons from the Bay Area

MTC OVERVIEW OF SB 1 (BEALL AND FRAZIER)

RCTC 91 Express Lanes Toll Policy Adopted June 7, 2012

5/3/2016. May 4, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

APPENDIX I REVENUE PROJECTION AND ASSUMPTIONS

Hot Springs Bypass Extension TIGER 2017 Application. Benefit-Cost Analysis Methodology Summary

2016 HERNANDO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY

Attachment 3, Page 1

One Gateway Plaza Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA goo REQUIRES 213 VOTE PER Administrative Code , Part D

OC NETWORK + ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORKING GROUP THURSDAY, AUGUST 11TH, :00 A.M. 11:00 A.M.

CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN

ECONOMIC USE PATTERNS FOR ATLANTA S HOT LANES

Page 2 of 9 project costs are included in the budget consistent with the adopted Measure C and Measure J Strategic Plans. Below is a summary of the FY

bg 2017 lacmta. Metro

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metro Budget Overview

Countywide Dialogue on Transportation

Oakland Park Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Projects. Mobility. Oakland Park Blvd. Total Funding Amounts ($):

budget 60/215 FY 2013/14 74/215 East Junction SR-91 HOV green river local widening project I-215 South 10/Bob Hope-Ramon

Memorandum. Agenda Item 2. TO: Conunission. DA TE: December 8, FR: Executive Director. RE: Regional Measure 3. Background

MEASURE M DRAFT GUIDELINES

Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation. North Carolina Turnpike Authority Beau Memory March 14, 2017

APPROVE INCREASE TO L1FE-OF-PROJECT BUDGET

Measure I Strategic Plan, April 1, 2009 Glossary Administrative Committee Advance Expenditure Agreement (AEA) Advance Expenditure Process

ECONOMIC ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES PAPER

32 nd Street Corridor Improvements

Administration and Projects Committee STAFF REPORT March 1, 2018 Page 2 of 9 Below is a summary of the FY adopted budget and the proposed midy

RECAP OF PROCEEDINGS LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

University Link LRT Extension

TXDOT CONGESTION RELIEF INITIATIVE, INCLUDING

TESTIMONY. The Texas Transportation Challenge. Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing

Metro. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza 3rd Floor Board Room. Los Angeles, CA. RECAP of Proceedings

RECAP of Proceedings. Metro. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza 3rd Floor Board Room.

METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Independent Accountants Report on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

TEXAS METROPOLITAN MOBILITY PLAN: FUNDING NEW OPPORTUNITIES

I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan. October 2018 Public Meetings

MOTION NO. M Agreement with the City of Seattle and King County Metro for Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel Mitigation

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

Driving Ahead for Funding: What Will We Do About Our Crumbling Transportation System

Tampa Bay Express Planning Level Traffic and Revenue (T&R) Study

Forecasting Traffic and Revenue Traditional and Express Lane Tolling

I -15 Mira Mesa/ Scripps Ranch Direct Access Ramp and Transit Station Cost Risk Management Report

IMPACTS OF PROPOSITION 90 TAX PORTABILITY IN EL DORADO COUNTY REVISED

5.0 ALTERNATIVES 5.1 OVERVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

AGENDA CITIZEN S TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE/ SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (CTAC/SSTAC)

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY11 Budget. Budget Message from the CEO. 1. LACMTA Organization Chart..

2017 Congestion & Freight Mobility Workgroup. Senator Boquist Senator Johnson Representative Smith Warner Representative McLain

DRCOG is local officials working together to address the region's challenges for today and tomorrow. Metro Vision 2040

SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of Regional Leadership Forum March 15, 2018

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Figure 1-1: SR 156 Study Area & Monterey Expressway Alignment

2016 PAVEMENT CONDITION ANNUAL REPORT

David Vautin, Senior Transportation Planner Metropolitan Transportation Commission TRB Performance Conference June 1, 2015 Denver, Colorado

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Tweed-New Haven Airport: An Economic Impact Analysis

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission

How to Pay for Transportation? A Survey of Public Preferences

I-77 Express Lanes Project Project Update. Rodger Rochelle October 2014

Appendix. G RTP Revenue Assumptions REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

RECAP of Proceedings. Board of Directors - Regular Board Meeting

Transcription:

Appendix 17

Los Angeles County is requesting that the California Transportation Commission (CTC) secure the other half of the $3.6 billion in needed funding from the $2.7 billion South County portion of the Corridor Mobility program for the following projects: Project Description Estimated Total Project Cost (Escalated) Non-Corridor Mobility Funds Programmed to Date Corridor Mobility Program Proposal Interstate 5 from Interstate 605 to Orange County Line $1,413 $1,026 $387 Interstate 5 Carpool Lane from Route 170 to Route 134 606 533 73 I-405 Carpool Lane I-10 to US-101 (Northbound) 950 220 730 Interstate 10 Extend El Monte Busway to County Line 365 9 356 Sub Total 3,334 1,788 1,546 Interstate 10/605 Transition (I-605 South to I-10 East) 71 _ 71 Route 138 Avenue "T" to Route 18 Widenings 145 34 111 Sub Total 216 34 182 TOTAL $3,550 $1,822 $1,728 Listed below is a breakdown of specific project economic benefits: Annual Net Economic Benefits in 2030 (1) (Dollar Figures in 2007 $Mil) Project(s) Constructed Additional Jobs (2) (Thousands) Gross Reg'l Product (3) Inc/(Dec) Real, Disp. Personal Income (4) Inc/(Dec) Nominated Los Angeles County CMIA Projects 26.6 5,352 2,467 I-5 Mixed Flow & 1 HOV each direction from OC Line to I-605 11.9 2,373 1,094 I-405 Northbound HOV Lane from I-10 to US-101 5.8 1,174 540 I-5 HOV Lane each direction from SR-134 to SR- 170 4.0 800 373 I-10 One HOV Lane each direction from Puente Ave to SR-57 2.1 419 191 SR-138 Widen from 1 to 2 Lanes each direction from Ave T to SR-18 1.4 291 134 1) Economic benefits are based on construction cost figures provided by Caltrans District 7, Los Angeles County vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and vehicle hours traveled (VHT) forecasts provided by District 7 from the Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG) regional travel demand model, and were calculated using the Regional Economic Models Inc. (REMI) TranSight software and economic model for Los Angeles County. 2) Additional Jobs are thousands of jobs gained in Los Angeles County in 2030 as a result of decreased congestion and increased mobility provided by construction of the projects listed. 3) Gross Regional Product (GRP) is the net economic output change in 2030 resulting from construction of the projects listed. Although the year of measurement is 2030, the figures given are in millions of current year (2007) dollars. 4) Real, Disposable Personal Income is the net disposable income change for Los Angeles County in 2030 resulting from construction of the projects listed. Again, the figures given are in millions of current year (2007) dollars. 18

The REMI Economic Model Regional Economic Models, Inc. (REMI), based in Amherst, Mass., constructs models that reveal the economic and demographic effects that policy initiatives may cause on a local economy. REMI model users include national, regional, state and city governments, as well as universities, nonprofit organizations, public utilities and private consulting firms. The REMI model is a structural model, meaning that it clearly includes cause-and-effect relationships. The model-building system uses hundreds of programs developed over the last two decades to build highly-detailed, customized models for each area using data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, The Department of Energy, the Census Bureau and other public sources. Metro licenses a single region, 70-sector model covering Los Angeles County packaged in a program called Policy Insight. REMI TranSight is the front-end interface used to access the model, as it is geared for inputs related to transportation projects. For each project modeled, the program requires the following inputs: Construction costs by year (provided by Caltrans District 7 and spread using an estimated construction curve); Costs of ongoing maintenance (estimated to be 0.1% per year of the construction costs); Regional travel demand data in the form of vehicle hours traveled and vehicle miles traveled both with the projects and without them (also provided by District 7 from the SCAG regional model); and An estimate of the finance costs to the region for each project. Once the required information is entered, TranSight passes the inputs to the proper locations in Policy Insight to generate tables and charts projecting economic impacts in a wide variety of categories and levels of detail. For these projects, we have chosen to focus on summary data in the following four categories: Jobs - Additional Jobs are thousands of jobs gained in Los Angeles County in 2030 as a result of decreased congestion and increased mobility provided by construction of the project or projects listed. Gross Regional Product - Gross Regional Product is the net economic output change. Although the benefits are measured in 2030, the figures given are in millions of current year (2007) dollars to simplify comparisons. Personal Income - Real, disposable personal income is the net disposable income change for Los Angeles County in 2030. Again, the figures given are in millions of current year (2007) dollars. Regional Exports The economic benefits of increased mobility will make the region more competitive relative to the rest of the nation and world. This category provides a monetary measure of those benefits in 2030, again expressed in current year (2007) dollars. 19

Proposed Los Angeles County Corridor Mobility Improvement Program Senate Districts 20

Proposed Los Angeles County Corridor Mobility Improvement Program Assembly Districts 21