ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No. 221 of Tuesday, this the 23 rd day of January, 2018

Similar documents
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No. 11 of Thursday, this the 15th day of March, 2018

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, UCKNOW. Original Application No. 166 of Tuesday, this the 13 th day of March, 2018

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No.297 of Thursday, this the 29 th day of June 2017

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 199 of Thursday, this the 30 th day of August, 2018

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 537 of Friday, this the 16 th day of November, 2018

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 324 of Friday, this the 09 th day of February, 2018

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 633 of Friday, this the 18 th day of January, 2019

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No. 06 of 2018

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. O.A. No. 630 of 2017

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Transferred Application No of Monday this the 8th day of May 2017

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI. O.A. No. 87 of 2014

In this petition short point is involved which is. with respect to the petitioner s right to get the benefit of

Thursday this the 17 th day of September, Hon ble Mr. Justice V.K. DIXIT, Member (J) Hon ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)

Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi. OA No.571/2017

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.-

FORM NO 21 (See Rule 102 (1) ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOLKATA APPLICATION NO: O.A. 10 OF 2011 THIS 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013

THE INDIAN JURIST

4. The Officer in charge, Madras Engineer Group Record Office Madras Engineering Group Sivanchetty Garden (PO) Post Box No.4201, Bangalore

K.J.S. Buttar Vs Union of India and Anr (Civil Appeal No of 2006) MARCH 31, 2011 [MARKANDEY KATJU AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ] SERVICE LAW: ARMED

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- OA 1989 of 2012

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI. O.A.No.62 of 2014

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- OA 2952 of 2012

T. A. NO.01/2015 THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2016 HON BLE JUSTICE N. K. AGARWAL, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL REGIONAL BENCH, KOCHI. O.A.No.129 OF 2014 MONDAY, 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014/10TH AGRAHAYANA, 1936 CORAM:

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION No 186 of Thursday, this the 26 th day of July, 2018

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- OA 1045 of 2014

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- OA 3222 of 2013

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Friday, the 16 th of May, 2014

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOCHI

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI. O.A. No.23 of 2014

STATUS OF THE CASES OF PRE 2006 PENSIONERSS IN VARIOUS COURTS : AS ON COMPILED BY M. L. KANAUJIA, IRSSE

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- OA 3598 of 2013

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOCHI

SPEED POST MOST IMPORTANT CIRCULAR / OP IMMEDIATE OFFICE OF THE PCDA (PENSIONS), DRAUPADI GHAT ALLAHABAD. Circular No. 01 Dated:

Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Mool Singh And Anr. on 7 December, 2001

IN THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOCHI

STATUS OF THE CASES OF PRE 2006 PENSIONERSS IN VARIOUS COURTS : AS ON COMPILED BY M. L. KANAUJIA, IRSSE

A very simple but ticklish issue arises in this writ. petition. The issue is whether a person retiring from a higher grade

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR. TA No.1139 of 2010 (arising out of C.W.P. No.8469 of 2004) Versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P. (C.) No.12711/2009. % Date of Decision : Through Mr. Rajat Gaur, Adv.

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI. O.A.No.33 of 2014

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI. O.A.No.84 of 2014

O.A.No.142 of 2013 THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE V. PERIYA KARUPPIAH (MEMBER - JUDICIAL) AND THE HONOURABLE LT GEN ANAND MOHAN VERMA (MEMBER ADMINISTRATIVE)

STATUS OF THE CASES OF PRE 2006 PENSIONERS IN VARIOUS COURTS : AS ON COMPILED BY M. L. KANAUJIA, IRSSE

IN THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, GUWAHATI O.A. NO. 25 OF 2013 P R E S E N T

Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi. OA No.2822/2016. Hon ble Ms. Praveen Mahajan, Member (A) VERSUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.2530 OF Birla Institute of Technology.Appellant(s) VERSUS

INDIAN RAILWAYS TECHNICAL SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION (Estd. 1965, Regd. No.1329, Website )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.1381 OF Chennai Port Trust.Appellant(s) VERSUS

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO 201 of 2011

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 830 OF 2018 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS.

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL REGIONAL BENCH, KOCHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 2331/2011

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOCHI

Office of the Principal CDA(Pensions) Draupadi Ghat, Allahabad

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOCHI. O A No.103 of 2011

REPORTED * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of Decision : December 06, 2010 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Ex F.A 7/2011. Reserved on : Date of Decision :

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT, 1958 RSA No. 38/2014 & CM No.2339/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 4th February,2014

* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 221/2014 & CM APPL.13917/2014. Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI

Present: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH C.A.V. on: Pronounced on:

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI. O.A. No. 40 of 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER Reserved on: 21st February, 2012 Pronounced on: 2nd July, 2012 MAC.APP.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Indian Employees [ Judgment - 68 ] NON REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.5282/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 2nd July, 2013

C.A. No. 3237/1998 & 3247/1998 (Under Art. 136 of the Constitution of India) INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD...APPELLANT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Decided on: 13th February, 2015 MAC.APP. 84/2014

BEFORE THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY (Constituted under Section 22A of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949) APPEAL NO. 03/ICAI/2017 IN THE MATTER OF:

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2 ISSN

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. - versus M/S ZORAVAR VANASPATI LIMITED

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 969/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Judgment delivered on: 2nd April, 2014 MAC.APP. 758/2012.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. W.P (C ) No. 5562/2002. Judgment reserved on: October 05, 2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INTEREST ON THE AMOUNT OF LEAVE ENCASHMENT Judgment delivered on W.P.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment Reserved On: 3 rd August, 2010 Judgment Delivered On: 6 th August, W.P.(C) NO.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF (Arising out S.L.P. (C) NO OF 2007) Versus

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Advocate. Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF Tapan Kumar Dutta...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Date of decision: 7th March, LPA No. 741/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of decision : 26 th November, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. Through Mr.P.K.

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD. TAX APPEAL NO. 93 of 2000

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CENTRAL EXCISE ACT, 1944 Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 5636/2010. versus W.P.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER MAC. APP. 30/2006. Judgment reserved on: 14th November,2007

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- TA 934 of 2010 (Arising out of CS 128 of 2008)

IMPORTANT JUDGEMENTS

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH B BEFORE SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI N V VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI. O.A.No.154 of 2013

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) No.183 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. LPA No.101/2010 and LPA No.461/2010 & CM Appl. Nos /2010. Date of Hearing:

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH H : NEW DELHI VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.2015 OF 2007 VERSUS J U D G M E N T

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF Versus. M/s Garg Sons International.

Office of the Principal CDA(Pensions) Draupadi Ghat, Allahabad

01 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI.... Respondent Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate.

Transcription:

1 Court No. 1 Reserved Judgment ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Original Application No. 221 of 2017 Tuesday, this the 23 rd day of January, 2018 Hon ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon ble Air Marshal BBP Sinha, Member (A) Lt. Col. Om Prakash Singh Son of Late Shambhu Nath Singh Resident of village Bahalolpur, Post Nehula Police Station Mehanazpur District Azamgarh.. Applicant By Legal Practitioner - Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate Versus 1. Union of India, through the Secretary, Department of Defence, New Delhi. 2. The Chief of Army, IHQ of MoD, Sena Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. AG s Branch/MP-6 (B), IHQ of MoD (Army), West Block-III, R.K. Puram, New Delhi. 4. The PCDA (P), Draupadi Ghat, Allahabad. Respondents By Legal Practitioner Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal Learned Counsel for the Central Govt.

2 ORDER Hon ble Air Marshal BBP Sinha, Member (A) 1. The instant Original Application has been filed on behalf of the applicant under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, whereby the applicant has sought the relief for rounding off of disability pension from 40% to 50%. 2. The applicant is in receipt of disability pension and he has filed this Original Application No. 221 of 2017 for the relief of rounding off of the disability pension. Undisputed facts of the case, agreed by both learned counsel for the parties, is that the applicant was recruited in the Army on 28.03.1977 and selected for the commissioned rank in January, 1986 in Army and commissioned on 15.12.1989 as 2 nd Lt. The applicant superannuated from service on 31.01.2014 (afternoon) in low medical category. The applicant is in receipt of 40% disability pension for life. The applicant approached the respondents for benefit of rounding off of disability pension which has not been granted to him. Aggrieved, the applicant has filed this Original Application. The delay in filing of Original Application has been condoned vide order dated 29.06.2017. 3. Heard Shri Parijaat Belaura, learned counsel for the applicant, Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the record.

3 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is in receipt of 40% disability pension for life as per Corrigendum PPO No. M/CORR/8185/2014 dated 09.12.2014. However, as per Govt of India, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi letter No.1(2)/97/1/D(Pen-C) dated 31.01.2001, the applicant is entitled for rounding off of the disability pension but it has not been granted to him. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that in catena of judgments, various Benches of Armed Forces Tribunals have given the benefit of rounding off to the personnel who have retired after completion of their terms of engagement in low medical category and Hon ble The Apex Court has nodded in agreement of such relief. 5. Despite repeated opportunities, no counter affidavit has been filed by learned counsel for the respondents which is indicative from order sheet dated 24.07.2017, 04.10.2017, 14.11.2017, 06.12.2017, 02.01.2018 & 12.01.2018. However, in the absence of counter affidavit, PPO itself is indicative of receipt of 40% disability pension. Subsequently, learned counsel for the respondents conceded that keeping in view various judgments of the Armed Forces Tribunals, the applicant is entitled to the benefit of rounding off. 6. We feel to recall the judgment of Hon ble The Apex Court in the case of K.J.S. Buttar vs. Union of India and others reported in SCC 2011, XI, 429 wherein Hon ble The Apex Court has observed that a person who was discharged by retirement on completion of terms of service with a disability, was held to be invalided out and

4 was held entitled to the benefit of broad banding. Hon ble The Apex Court in Paras 17 & 18 of the judgment of K.J.S. Buttar (supra) has observed as under :- 17. The respondents submitted that the appellant was not entitled to the above benefits as he had retired on completion of his Short Service Commission of 10 years and had not been invalided out of service. 18. In this connection it may be mentioned that the appellant was invalided out and released in a low medical category with permanent disability assessed at 50% by the Release Medical Board. As per the Defence Services Regulations/Pension Regulations for the Army 1961 where any officer is found suffering from disability attributable to or aggravated by Military Service he shall be deemed to have been invalided out of service. Relevant provision (page 25 additional documents) read as under :- 53. Officers Compulsorily Retired on Account of Age or on Completion of Tenure. (1) An officer retired on completion of tenure or on completion of terms of engagement or on attaining the age of 50 years (irrespective of their period of engagement), if found suffering from a disability attributable to or aggravated by military service and recorded by service medical authorities, shall be deemed to have been invalided out of service and shall be granted disability pension from the date of retirement, if the accepted degree of disability is 20% or more, and service element, if the degree of disability is less than 20%. The retiring pension/retiring gratuity, if already sanctioned and paid, shall be adjusted against the disability pension/service element, as the case may be. (2) The disability element referred to in clause (1) above shall be assessed on the accepted degree of disablement at the time of retirement/discharge on the basis of the rank held on the date on which the wound/injury was sustained or in the case of disease. In our opinion the appellant is entitled to the benefit of the above Regulation. 7. It is also observed that the Hon ble Supreme Court in Review Petition (C) No. 2688 of 2013 in Civil Appeal No. 5591/2006, U.O.I. & ANR vs K.J.S. Buttar has dismissed the Review Petition both on ground of delay as well as on merits on 21.01.2014.

5 8. On the issue of rounding off of the disability pension, we also recall the judgment and order of Hon ble The Apex Court of Union of India and Ors vs Ram Avtar & ors (Civil Appeal No. 418 of 2012 dated 10 th December 2014) in which Hon ble The Apex Court nodded in disapproval the policy of the Government of India in not granting the benefit of rounding off of disability pension to the personnel who have retired on attaining the age of superannuation or completion of their tenure of engagement, if found to be suffering from some disability. 9. In view of the directions given by Hon ble The Apex Court in the cases of K.J.S. Buttar vs. Union of India & others (supra) and Union of India & others vs. Ram Avtar (supra), we are of the considered view that in conformity with the Rules, Regulations and the dictum of law laid down by Hon ble The Apex Court, the applicant is entitled to the benefit of rounding off of disability pension to 50%. 10. So far as entitlement of the applicant to receive arrears of disability pension is concerned, the larger Bench of Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No. 1439 of 2016, Ex Sgt Girish Kumar vs. Union of India & Ors relying upon the decision of Hon ble Apex Court in the case of Davinder Singh vs. Union of India & Ors (C.A. No. 9946 of 2016) decided on 20.09.2016 has held that the benefit of broad banding of disability/war injury element of pension will be with effect from

6 01.01.1996. The relevant portion of the Full Bench decision in the case of Ex Sgt Girish Kumar (supra) is reproduced as under :- 55. After having fully discussed the issue involved before us and to set the controversy at rest vis-à-vis arrears of broad banding of the disability/war injury element of disability pension on the ground of delay in filing application(s) by the individual/applicant(s), we conclude grant of arrears of broad banding of disability pension, stands answered in the fact that all applicants will be entitled to broad banding of disability/war injury element of pension with effect from 01.01.1996, irrespective of whether they retired pre- 1996 or post-1996 without any restriction of arrears of three years. 11. The Original Application No. 221 of 2017 succeeds and is allowed. The applicant is entitled for benefit of rounding off and shall be paid enhanced disability pension by rounding off from 40% to 50% for life from the date of discharge. The respondents are directed to pay the enhanced disability pension alongwith the arrears within four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case the respondents fail to give effect to this order within the stipulated time, they will have to pay interest @ 9% on the amount accrued from due date till the date of actual payment. 12. No order as to costs. (Air Marshal BBP Sinha) Member (A) Dated : January, 2018 SB (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (J)